TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    History

    The Partial Historians

    Join Dr Rad and Dr G as we discuss, spar, and laugh our way through different aspects of the ancient Roman world! Our main series ‘From the Foundation of the City’ follows Roman history year by year from the traditional foundation date of 753 BCE. We also interview academics and specialists from around the globe for their insights into history and the representation of Rome and the ancient Mediterranean in popular culture. Dr Fiona Radford is an expert on Rome on film and wrote her thesis on Kubrick’s Spartacus. Dr Radford is exponent of not only Ancient History, but also Reception Studies. Dr Peta Greenfield is an expert on the Vestal Virgins. Dr Greenfield’s research interests include: religion and politics in Rome, the late republic and Augustan period, and the role of women.


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © The Partial Historians

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Special Episode – The Ara Pacis and Livia’s Villa with Dr Victoria Austen Nov 03, 2022
    Show notes

    Understanding ancient monuments requires a careful eye as well as detective work to delve into the representations and their layers of meaning. In this interview we are joined by Dr Victoria Austen to consider the representation of foliage on the Ara Pacis Augustae and the Garden Room of Livia’s villa. Both these structures hold a special place for scholars interested in the Augustan period and studying them together reveals fruitful connections for considering the messages Augustus sought to convey about his rule.Special Episode – The Ara Pacis and Livia's Villa with Dr Victoria AustenDr Victoria Austen holds a MA and PhD from King’s College London. She has lectured in the Classics at the University of Winnipeg and is currently the Robert A. Oden, Jr. Postdoctoral Fellow for Innovation in the Humanities and Classics at Carleton College, Minnesota. Her research interests span the Latin literature of the Late Republic and Early Empire; ancient Roman gardens and landscapes; race and ethnicity in the ancient world; the reception of classical myth; and the integration of digital humanities into the classroom. Austen’s monograph Analysing the Boundaries of the Roman Garden: (Re)Framing the Hortus is forthcoming in 2023 as part of the Bloomsbury Ancient Environments Series.The Ara Pacis AugustaeThe Altar of Augustan Peace is considered one of the outstanding monuments from the reign of Augustus. It’s packed with images and is most famous for its processional friezes and the friezes that depict various deities. But when you encounter the Ara Pacis, you're at eye level with the acanthus friezes – highly stylised displays of foliage and small animals. It is these acanthus friezes that we consider with Dr Austen.The acanthus friezes of the Ara Pacis dominate the lower register of the exterior. They were originally highly saturated and striking in colour. One of the acanthus friezes up close. The foliage grows out from an acanthus base and as the tendrils progress they seem to change into different plants. At the top of the frieze you might even spot two swans on either side of the main stem. Thanks to Dr Victoria Austen for this photo.The Garden Room of Livia’s VillaA more private setting than the Ara Pacis, Livia’s villa is nonetheless an important example for considering the ways in which garden imagery was utilised during the Augustan regime. Dr Austen takes us on a tour of the Garden Room delving into the imagery and how understanding this room can help us better appreciate the Ara Pacis as well.The Garden Room of Livia's Villa can still be visited today – we highly recommend the experience! The fresco is housed by the Palazzo Massimo alle Terme. Photo credit to Miguel Hermoso Cuesta, Wikimedia Commons.Detail from the Garden frieze showing the low fences that suggest a demarcated garden area with a wilderness in the background. Notice the continued sense of cultivation throughout. Photo courtesy of Dr Victoria Austen.Different trees are a focal point in the Garden frescoes and here we see an oak surrounded by birdlife. Photo courtesy of Dr Victoria Austen.Looking to learn more about Livia after this episode? We have just the thing for you – a whole episode dedicated to exploring her life and representation.Sound CreditsThanks to BBC Sounds, Fesliyan Studios, Orange Free Sounds and Sound Bible for sound effects, and the gifted Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music.Automated TranscriptGenerated by Otter AI. Let’s see how the AI copes with the Latin and tricky Australian accent this time round!Dr Rad 0:16Welcome to The Partial Historians,Dr G 0:20we explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:23Everything from the political scandals, the love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:34And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories.Dr Rad 0:43Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 1:09Hello, and welcome to a brand new special episode of The Partial Historians. I am Dr. G. And with me is Dr. Rad. And also very excitingly, we have Dr. Vicky Austen as well. Hello,Dr Victoria Austen 1:28Hello.Dr G 1:29Hello. How are you?Dr Victoria Austen 1:31Good. Good. Very happy to be here. Excellent.Dr G 1:35Excellent. Well, we'll see if that continues throughout the course of the interview. We are very thrilled to have Dr. Austen with us to have a chat about things to do with the our pockets are gusty, and also the villa Olivia. So these are two really key sort of architectural works that come out of the Augustine period. So I'm a bit of an Augustine fanboy, which is problematic as a historian, one knows. And so I'm thrilled to be here. Dr. Read specialises more in Tiberius, and may have some criticisms to add into the conversation.Dr Rad 2:13Look, you know given the focus that where we're taking I don't know if I'm going to crap all over Augustus like I normally do. Well just just have to see…Dr Victoria Austen 2:24I mean, he does kind of open himself up for that a lot of the time so I kind of love to hate him.Dr Rad 2:32Yeah, the same way that you know, I I love Tiberius, but I can also see his flaws, you know? Yeah, but at least we're talking about Tiberius' mum.Dr G 2:42Oh, that's true. Yeah.Dr Rad 2:43Yeah, Freudian complexities, you know.Dr G 2:48Wait a minute. All right. So Dr. Victoria Austen holds an MA and PhD from King's College London. She has lectured in the classics at the University of Winnipeg. And is currently the Robert A. Odin Junior Postdoctoral Fellow for Innovation in the Humanities and Classics at Carleton College Minnesota. Her research interests span the Latin literature of the late Republic and early empire, ancient Roman gardens and landscapes, race and ethnicity in the ancient world, the reception of classical myth and the integration of digital humanities into the classroom. So we have a specialist in many areas with us today.Dr Victoria Austen 3:31Yeah, like I it's, it's boring to just be interested in one thing. So I just like to, if I get frustrated with one topic, then I can give it up for a while and move to something else. That's my that's my general approach to it.Dr G 3:45And I think that's really useful and good because there's lots of ways in which that interval can be approached and taking a single focus might mean that you miss out on some of the really cool interconnections that are out there to be seen. Exactly. So Austen's monograph Analysing the Boundaries of the Roman Garden: Reframing the Hortus is forthcoming in 2023, as part of the Bloomsbury Ancient Environment series, so welcome, welcome.Dr Victoria Austen 4:11Thank you. I feel like whenever anyone says my new position title, because it has the word innovation in it's like, I feel under pressure all the time to say something really exciting and innovative. SoDr Rad 4:26hopefully, I will be doing that. Sounds very impressive.Dr Victoria Austen 4:30I know it sounds great. I mean, it's it's a long, it's a long title. But yeah, it just started so, you know, hopefully there'll be innovation comingDr G 4:41off that there is no doubt I think it's interesting to pair innovation with classics though, because traditionally, Classics is considered very, maybe very particular in the way it approaches things maybe less than innovative. And yes, it's a really good spot to see it all coming together. I mean, like, we know there's room for growth here, guys.Dr Victoria Austen 4:57Exactly. It's potentially not a high bar.Dr Rad 5:04That's the best part of your training.Dr Victoria Austen 5:08We could Yeah, we'll, we'll aim high with it.Dr G 5:14I look forward to seeing how it progresses. So to get us started, we might start with some one of the really obvious questions, perhaps which is what is the Ara pocket? So Gus stay?Dr Victoria Austen 5:26Yeah, so essentially, it's a big monumental altar, kind of mini complex. It's made up of a central marble altar. And then that altar is surrounded by four walls. And it has kind of steps going up one side, and there's also kind of an entrance, past the steps. And then you can also exit the other side. And, yes, it's an altar, but it's probably most famous for what's depicted on the outer friezes. So, you know, people tend to forget that it is a sacred altar complex. And instead, they focus a lot on it as a piece of artwork because it has these fantastic exterior friezes, that show all of these kind of mythological and also Imperial images that are really designed to place Augustus at the centre of pretty much everything. It's like I am the chosen one I have, you know, there's images of a near us there's images of Romulus and Remus, Venus, the kind of mythical Roma, and then you have this procession of all of these senators in the imperial family. And it's really designed as this very kind of monumental statement of Augustan power. And the whole kind of concept of the altar as well, are a parkus means altar of peace. And it kind of gets to the heart of that Aug, A message of he's very, very keen to say, you know, I've closed the doors of the temple of Janus. And you know, we have no war anymore. But it's kind of peace born out of military victories. So this ultra complex was awarded to him by the Senate as a kind of commemoration for the fact that now Rome has this piece. But obviously, pieces may be an interesting thing to commemorate when actually, it's the result of all of these kinds of military successes and a very kind of powerful statement.Dr Rad 7:28Absolutely. So the exterior of the Ara Pacis Augustae, is dominated in the lower register by panels known as the acanthus friezes. So when you visit the Ara Pacis sees acanthus friezes dominate your perspective as a viewer, what is it that makes these friezes special in terms of the flora that's depicted on them?Dr Victoria Austen 7:50Yeah, so this is kind of my primary focus, really, these lower friezes, which goes against, in some ways, the kind of traditional approach to this alter complex, because as I said, that kind of upper registers have all of these very obviously, political, Imperial dynastic images of Augustan power. But for me, the lower friezes are doing more of the same, but I think it's in a more subtle way. And for me, what's really interesting is maybe taking a step back and rethinking about this division between kind of figural sculptural reliefs and then what's traditionally been seen as more ornamental or kind of, it's just pretty flowers at the bottom for, you know, it doesn't mean anything. But I think more and more, it's kind of widely accepted that these floral friezes can really contribute to that Augustan message on what we see with these friezes, it wraps around the entire kind of bottom register of the altar. And it's not just a random array of flowers, you know, they're very purposely picked. And they're all designed to kind of put forward particular kind of Augustan messages, you know, the campus itself, this as a plant is a plant characterised by it loses its leaves, and then it kind of re re emerges. So that idea of rebirth is really kind of central to Augustus, his new role in general. And that's kind of visually represented on these friezes where you have a central account this flower, and then it kind of Blooms out and spirals and transforms into all of these other flowers and plants. And it's kind of this magical, fantastical, abundant display. So for me, it's really cool because it it's not just that ornamental aesthetic decoration, you know, there's a lot to be said about what's going on with all of these plants,Dr Rad 9:52like ya know, like, I can't believe until I read your article that I hadn't really thought of that I definitely in the past have focused entirely on the people I'm like, People, let's focus on what the people need because people need people. And I've completely ignored the flowers at not thinking about the fact that if you're chiselling something into marble and sculpting something, you probably did pick it on purpose, you probably didn't go. Now I want an Aeneas, I want Romulus I want all the members of the imperial family and then just whatever, yes, just whatever takes your fancy.Unknown Speaker 10:23And I mean, it's, it's not to say, you know, that kind of the campus ornament, it was a popular ornament at the time, we see it on lots of things. And it can be kind of purely, you know, decorative. But the fact that I mean, one, this is on this monument, there's more of it than anywhere else. Yeah. And actually, it like, actually dominates your view. And when you think about where the Ara Pacis was in the campus Martius, and the fact that you have the steps leading up to it, actually, the floral ornament is at eye level. So that's the thing that you're probably going to come it's going to catch your eye first. So I think it's been really underestimated in the past, I think not just how important it is on its own, but it actually interacts with what's going on above with the people, it complements what's going on. It's not just merely decoration. Yeah,Dr Rad 11:15I think I think thinking about things spatially like that adds so many more interesting dimensions. And it's easy to forget, I think, especially because we live where we do, we don't actually get to experience these things all that often. And so we're looking at them in books. So we look at the pictures of the different phrases. But when we were doing an episode on children in Pompeii, it was really interesting to consider, like the height level of things, and how you know, people of different ages would have experienced from pain. And this is kind of a similar thing. It's about what hits your eye, what would you see. And again, I think Augustus is the master manipulator, and there's no way he would ever leave anything.Unknown Speaker 11:56And another thing in terms of just how it would catch your eye, very easy to forget that there would be so much colour on this monument. And, you know, this is well documented now, but I think it's so easy to forget that we this monument would have been coloured, and, you know, floral ornament, it's got to be probably very vibrant colours, you know, the the general impression is that, obviously, there's a lot of green, probably on a very kind of blue background, and then lots of other colours for the flowers. So that's really going to stand out, because I can't imagine that even the upper figural reliefs, they're going to be much less plain just because of the subject matter. You know, it's a lot of members of the imperial family and senators in togas, it's not it's not going to have that same kind of vibrancy as seeing this kind of bright green and blues on the bottom. And as I said, it's at eye level. So and as you rightly said, he doesn't do anything by chance. So I think, you know, this is this is not something to be ignored.Dr Rad 13:04No, definitely not. And that's definitely it. I mean, my, in spite of the fact that my students hate black and white, when we're looking at things from modern history. When it comes to Rome, they still really can't get their head around this idea of the colour and when they see things colourize They absolutely hate it. They're like, why can't it just be like an IKEA store where everything's just like, beige? It's so classy. But yeah,Dr Victoria Austen 13:29I mean, neutra…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Cossus Controversy Oct 13, 2022
    Show notes

    We return to the year 437 BCE and the exploits of Aulus Cornelius Cossus. Cossus came to our attention in the aftermath of the colony of Fidenae’s decision to switch their allegiances from Rome to the Etruscans. In this stressful time, the Romans had appointed Mamercus Aemilius as dictator. He led the Roman forces into battle, and it was here that the military tribune of the hour, Cossus, distinguished himself.Episode 130 – The Cossus ControversyControversial CossusIn the course of the conflict, Cossus single-handedly defeated the commander of the Etruscan forces, King Lars Tolumnius. Cossus stripped his corpse and was allowed to dedicate the spolia opima in the temple of Jupiter Feretrius. Last episode, we discussed the possible confusion over when this duel took place. Welcome to the Cossus Controversy!Helmet of the Italo-Chalcidian Type, Anatomical Cuirass, and Left Greavelate 5th–4th century BCE Etruscan, possible Vulci. Image courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.It turns out that Livy was aware of the problems with this story. Uncharacteristically, he provides some insight into these issues in a controversial passage:“Following all previous historians, I have stated that Aulus Cornelius Cossus was a military tribune when he brought the second spoils of honour to the temple of Jupiter Feretrius. But besides that only those are properly held to be “spoils of honour” which one commander has taken from another commander, and that we know no “commander” but him under whose auspices the war is waged, the very words inscribed upon the spoils disprove their account and mine, and show that it was as consul that Cossus captured them. Having heard from the lips of Augustus Caesar, the founder or renewer of all the temples, that he had entered the shrine of Jupiter Feretrius, which he repaired when it had crumbled with age, and had himself read the inscription on the linen breast-plate, I have thought it would be almost sacrilege to rob Cossus of such a witness to his spoils as Caesar, the restorer of that very temple. Where the error in regard to this matter lies, in consequence of which such ancient annals and also the books of the magistrates, written on linen and deposited in the temple of Moneta, which Licinius Macer cites from time to time as his authority, only give Aulus Cornelius Cossus as consul (with Titus Quinctius Poenus) seven years later, is a matter on which everybody is entitled to his opinion. For there is this further reason why so famous a battle could not be transferred to the later year, that the consulship of Cossus fell within a period of about three years when there were no wars, owing to a pestilence and a dearth of crops, so that certain annals, as though death-registers, offer nothing but the names of the consuls. The third year after Cossus's consulship saw him military tribune with consular powers, and in the same year he was master of the horse, in which office he fought another famous cavalry-engagement. Here is freedom for conjecture, but in my opinion it is idle; for one may brush aside all theories when the man who fought the battle, after placing the newly-won spoils in their sacred resting-place, testified in the presence of Jupiter himself, to whom he had vowed them, and of Romulus —witnesses not to be held lightly by a forger —that he was Aulus Cornelius Cossus, consul.” Livy, 4.20 – translation courtesy of Perseus Digital Library.What should we make of all this? Augustus himself being cited as a source? Dr G is beside herself with excitement.Quaking with FearThe Romans try to continue their campaign against the Etruscans, but a plague interferes with their plans. The gods must be furious because the outbreak is accompanied by terrifying prodigies like earthquakes. What state will the Romans be in after so many trials and tribulations?Things to Look Out ForSpurius Maelius possibly coming back from the deadConsultation of the famous Sibylline booksAugustus possibly trying to control Livy’s historical narrativeRaiding galoreWant to hear more about the original Spurius Maelius? Check out our previous episode on his assassination.Our Players 437 BCEConsulsM. Geganius M. f. – n. Macerinus (Pat) Cos 447, 443L. Sergius C. f. C. n. Fidenas (Pat)Consul SuffectusM. Valerius M. f. M’. n. Lactuca (M’ = Manius) (or Lanctucinus) Maximus (Pat)DictatorMam. Aemilius M. f. – n. Mamercinus (Pat)Master of the HorseL. Quinctius L. f. L. n. Cincinnatus (Pat) – son of the famous CincinnatusLegatesM. Fabius Vibulanus (Pat) Cos 442(T.) Quinctius Capitolinus (Barbartus) (Pat)Tribune of the SoldiersA. Cornelius Cossus (Pat)Our Players 436 BCEConsulsL. Papirius – f. – n. Crassus (Pat) Cos 430?M. Cornelius (M. f. L. n) Maluginensis (Pat)Tribune of the PlebsSp. MaeliusOur SourcesDr G reads Diodorus Siculus, 12.46; Cicero, de Re Publica, 1.6; Cicero, de Doma Sua, 86; Valerius Maximus, 5.3.2f-g.Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.17-21.Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Cornell, T. 2005 ‘The Value of the Literary Tradition Concerning Archaic Rome’ in Raaflaub, K. A. (ed) Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders (Expanded and Updated Edition) (Blackwell), pp 47-74Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Lintott, A. W. 1970. ‘The Tradition of Violence in the Annals of the Early Republic’ Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 19.1 (Jan., 1970), pp. 12-29Raaflaub, K. A. 2005 ‘The Conflict of the Orders in Archaic Rome: A Comprehensive and Comparative Approach’ in Raaflaub, K. A. (ed) Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders (Expanded and Updated Edition) (Blackwell), pp 1-46Sailor, D. 2006. ‘Dirty Linen, Fabrication, and the Authorities of Livy and Augustus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association (Vol 136), 329-388Wilson, M. 2021. Dictator: The Evolution of the Roman Dictatorship (University of Michigan Press).Sound CreditsThanks to BBC Sounds, Fesliyan Studios, Orange Free Sounds and Sound Bible for sound effects, and the gifted Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music.Etruscan Statuette from Apiro, Italy 460-450 BCE. Photo credit to Mary Harrsch on FlickrAutomated Transcript Provided by Otter AI. As always apologies in advance as the AI technology attempts to navigate our Australian accents and Latin!Dr Rad 00:16Welcome to the partial historians,Dr G 00:20we explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 00:23Everything from the political scandals, the love of ours, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 00:34And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman Sword by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories.Dr Rad 00:43Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city. Hello, and welcome to another episode of the partial historians. I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad. And I'm Dr. G. Looking very glamorous with a sort of almost iridescent eyeliner today.Dr G 01:20Thank you, I crunched up beetle shells myself.Dr Rad 01:24How very antiquity of you. I feel very Egyptian thing. I like it. I like it. So we are an ancient Roman History podcast. we're delving through the Roman Republic at this point in time, aren't we Dr. G?Dr G 01:39We are we've been tracing room's history from its foundation. And here we are in a roundabout for 36 BCE.Dr Rad 01:47Well, you just hold on to your horses mercy, because I have a little bit more to say about 437. I'm afraid. I know. So let's do a little bit of a recap ofDr G 01:56Allah. Wasn't that the you were too long years got stabbed in the groyne? Was it?Dr Rad 02:03This is the question that we're asking. We ask the big questions on the partial historians was a man stabbed in the groyne.Dr G 02:12There was a story about that.Dr Rad 02:14All right. It definitely was a question of when it happened, I suppose. Oh, yeah. And if indeed Yeah, exactly. So what we were dealing with was Rome has been as usual in conflict with some neighbouring areas. That's what was happening in fourthDr G 02:29era bully, they don't know how to get along with anybody.Dr Rad 02:31Well, to be fair, to be fair, this whole affair that we've been dealing with recently was sparked by someone else's actions. And they were just responding in kind with a snap to the ground. So what happened was we have one of their colonies FedUni, which had decided to treacherously switches. Can you imagine not wanting to be part of room? Yes. So they had changed their allegiances over to the address guns lever move? Yeah, absolutely. Who is still here, it is something of a force in the north in particular. And this led to a battle in which the actually not the Roman commander. I think I said the Roman commander, but actually not the dictator, but a young man by the name of cosas,Dr G 03:24who becomes super famous for killing Tulum news on the field of battle. Yes, so famous that he's compared to Romulus himself. Yes,Dr Rad 03:32exactly. So this guy's a big deal. We did raise some questions last time about exactly when the slang of the Etruscan King to lamenessDr G 03:43actually happened. We're in a very hazy period of American history in terms of the chronology as it were. And I think this is going to not be cleared up for another 10 years or so.Dr Rad 03:51Yeah, basically, we have accounts that place it in 437. But certainly there are questions raised about maybe it happened in 426. Because this is a very on again, off again, kind of issue that the Romans have.Dr G 04:07Can't hold on to LIS who knew?Dr Rad 04:09Yeah, so because there is this on again, off again, nature, it's possible that the exact chronology is a bit confused. And I must admit, I was pretty convinced by the idea that to lameness as the king and therefore the leader of these interesting forces that the Romans were fighting, I was kind of convinced by the idea that it would make sense for him to be killed in the final year of the conflict. And that to be like a signal of Right, yeah, done. Yeah. Over Yeah, rather than in the very first year, but nonetheless, it does crop up and forth. TheDr G 04:42tragedies happen and the Etruscans have 12 kings, so maybe they can find another one from somewhere else to die later.Dr Rad 04:47Exactly. Anyway, so we've got this whole idea of cosas, managing to defeat to laminators in battle, mano a mano, and being able to strip him him of his spoils. So his armour, his weapons, that kind of jazz, you know, and then getting to take part in this very special dedication ceremony where he dedicates this Bollier Optima, which is all that stuff. All that stuff is nicked off the guy's body. Yeah, exactly in the temple of Jupiter Farah treatise. Hmm. Which is you highlighted it's very, very special thing to do. It is super special. And not many people do it. Yeah. The only person to do it before cosas was apparently Romulus, which is saying something because as we've highlighted, he's probably fictional.Dr G 05:37It was a long time ago, and nobody's sure anymore if he was real.Dr Rad 05:41Yeah, exactly. Now, before we move on into the next year, I wanted to highlight a particular passage of Livy, which is connected to these events. So last episode, we talked about what the scholars think about this event and the potential haziness around the reporting of it. And I thought, I'm actually going to read out this entire passage of live events, very controversial passage. And so I think it bears repeating in full. So you ready? Oh, yeah, I'm excited. Yeah. So living himself actually acknowledged that there was debate over exactly what happened. Good man. He's done his research. He kind of has Okay, and I think you're gonna be very excited when you find out exactly how he's doing his research sorry. For my living voice, following all previous historians, because of course, we all know the Romans British, stated that all this Cornelius Corsas was a military Tribune when he brought the second spoils of honour to the Temple of Jupiter trees. But besides that, only those are properly held to be spoils of honour, which one commander takes from another commander, and that we know no commander but him, under whose auspices the war is waged, the very words inscribed upon the spoils, disprove their account and mine, and show that it was as console that cosas captured them.Dr G 07:17This makes sense, actually. It's like, it's very bizarre to have a moment where you're like, ah, an enemy commander has killed another enemy commander in battle and like, and his name's costless, and he's not on the controller list for this year. You're like, Oh, awkward.Dr Rad 07:32Exactly, exactly. So it's exactly what he's highlighting that hang on a second. There was a dictator. And because this actually wasn't the commander, this is just someDr G 07:41dude. Yeah.Dr Rad 07:42Okay, now, this is the power you're going to get really excited. So okay, here we go. Having heard from the lips of Augustus Caesar, the founder or renewer of all the temples that he had entered the shrine of Jupiter Farah trees, which he repaired when it had crumbled with age, and had himself read the inscription on the linen breastplate. I have thought it would be almost sacrilege to rob casus of such a witness to his spoils as Caesar, the restore of that very temple, where the era in regard to this matter lies in consequence of which such ancient annals and also the book of the magistrates, written on linen, and deposited in the temple of manita, which lies Kenya's may or may serve you prefer sites from time to time as his authority only gives all US Cornelius courses as console with Titus quinti is pointless. Seven years later, is a matter on which everybody is entitled to his opinion. For there is this further reason why so famous a battle could not be transferred to the later year that the consulship of courses fell within a period of about three years, when there were no wars, owing to a pestilence and dearth of crops, so that certain animals as though death registers offer nothing but the names of the consoles. The third year after Costas is consulship, saw him military Tribune with consular powers, and in the same year, he was master of the horse, in which office, he fought another famous cavalry engagement. Here is freedom for conjecture, but in my opinion, it is idle, for one may brush aside all theories when the man who fought the battle after placing the newly won spoils in their sacred resting place, testified in the presence of Trooper tar himself, to whom he had out them and do Romulus witnesses not to be held lightly by a forger that he was all us. Cornelius Costas console. Microphone drop. All right. So let's unpack this a little. Yeah,Dr G 10:18there's a lot going on here.Dr Rad 10:19There is a lot going on. But this is actually probably one of the most controversial passages of Livi.Dr G 10:25Oh, no, it's why he has done his best work. How can this be controversial? Yes, exactly. It's gone and talked to people. And he's looked at some evidence and, you know, some reliable sources, nobody's going to distrust or Gustus? Surely not. Well, it'sDr Rad 10:37just so fascinating, because he is highlighting all the things we've highlighted that there's so much confusion in this period. And it's partly because we've got some similar names that keep coming up in a very short period of time. And…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Seneca's Medea with MythTake Sep 29, 2022
    Show notes

    Medea is one of the most memorable characters in Greek mythology. She is powerful, has associations with magic, and capable of taking drastic action. Most people are familiar with the version of Medea crafted by the Athenian playwright Euripides, but today we turn to a lesser known interpretation.Special Episode – Seneca's Medea with MythTakeSeneca's MedeaA quick synopsis may be handy before diving into the episode!Prior to the playMedea is a semi-divine princess of Colchis (a land on the shores of the Black Sea). As a young woman, Medea fell in love with Jason while he is on his quest for the Golden Fleece. Medea used her gifts to aid Jason in completing the impossible tasks set by her father, King Aeëtes. Medea helped Jason to yoke the fiery bulls, win a competition with the giants, and slay the dragon that guarded the Fleece. In her love for Jason, she defied her father and decides to run away with him to Greece. To escape unnoticed from Cholcis, Medea kills her brother to distract her father. From there Jason and Medea travelled together to meet Pelias, king of Iolcus, who had agreed to give Jason his throne if he returned with the Fleece. But when Pelias saw the Fleece he refused to fulfil the agreement. Jason and Medea then worked together to bring about the downfall of Pelias, but needed to flee Iolcus after suspicion falls upon them. They finally settled in Corinth and have two sons.So Jason and Medea are bound together, not only by their children and their marriage, but by acts of violence which were often planned together but executed by Medea with her semi-divine skills and pharmaka (knowledge of herbs and drugs). A healthy relationship, this is not!Medea in Seneca's playJump ahead a few years and, in order to climb the political ladder, Jason decides to leave his marriage with Medea to marry Creusa the daughter of King Kreon of Thebes. The play opens with Medea cursing both Creusa and Kreon and seeking time to prepare for her exile. Kreon grants Medea one day before she is exiled which she immediately uses to plan her revenge on Jason for leaving her after everything they've been through together. She laces a stunning robe with poison and sends it to Creusa as a gift for her wedding with Jason. The Chorus describe Medea's rage and frustration in great detail and pray to the gods that Jason is spared from her vengeance. But Medea's pharmaka is extensive and the robe kills Creusa by catching on fire when she puts it on. Kreon tries to save his daughter but he catches on fire too when he touches the robe. But in the wake of their deaths, Medea does not feel any better; her need for vengeance remains. Medea resolves to sacrifice their children in a final act to help Jason understand the depth of pain he has caused by leaving her. This blood sacrifice seems to transform her and to reveal her divine form, as Medea escapes in a dragon chariot while she throws the bodies of the boys down to Jason. Jason observes that there are no gods because otherwise such acts would be impossible.Seneca the YoungerSeneca the Younger was a Stoic philosopher who witnessed a lot of the ups and downs of the Julio-Claudian emperors during his lifetime. After a couple of trips into exile, Seneca ended up rising to a position of immense influence. He was appointed tutor of Nero, the son of Agrippina the Younger and adopted heir of her husband, the emperor Claudius. When Nero succeeded Claudius, Seneca experienced a career high in the early years of his reign. However, stability was not a feature of Nero’s rule, and Seneca was eventually forced to commit suicide by his former pupil. As we consider Seneca's Medea, it's worth considering how his context influenced his work. Certainly he has plenty of strong women to draw upon from his own experience and the recent politics of ancient Rome! If there's two things that we love, it's women in the ancient world and the Julio-Claudian period in Rome. So understandably, we jumped at the chance to talk to Alison Innes and Darrin Sunstrum from the MythTake podcast about Seneca the Younger's interpretation of Medea. What did this man make of Medea’s story? Tune in to find out!Thanks as always to our Patreon and Ko-fi supporters.Sound CreditsThanks to the lovely Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music.Frederick Sandys between 1866 and 1868. MedeaMedea has a connection with pharmaka and this idea sets up her early interaction with Jason and has numerous consequences.John Downman 1750-1824 An Episode from the Story of Jason and Medea.Medea ascends to a higher plane after her suffering and Jason is left to bear the consequences of his choices.John William Waterhouse 1907. Jason and MedeaJason watches on as Medea utilises her skills in pharmaka in order to aide his quest to obtain the golden fleece.Automated TranscriptGenerated by Otter AI with some light editing! We know the Greek and Latin can be tough for automated transcripts, so apologies in advance for inadvertent mistakes (hopefully they'll make you giggle!).Dr Rad 0:15Welcome to a special episode of The Partial Historians. Today we sit down with the hosts of the amazing podcast MythTake to discuss all aspects of Seneca the Younger's Medea. We hope that you enjoyAlison Innes 0:40Good morning.Darrin Sunstrum 0:41Good afternoon.Alison Innes 0:42Good evening,Darrin Sunstrum 0:43and good night.Alison Innes 0:45Welcome to a another episode of MythTake,Darrin Sunstrum 0:48A fresh take on ancient myths.Alison Innes 0:50We still got it, Darren.Darrin Sunstrum 0:53It's been a while. I forgot.Alison Innes 0:54It has been it has been a little while since we have done an episode. But I am really excited about tonight's episode. We have two special guests from halfway around the world joining us by the virtue of or by the miracle of technology. We have Dr. Fiona Radford and Dr. Peta Greenfield from The Partial Historians podcast. They are experts in ancient Rome, which we are very much not experts. They look at various aspects of Roman life and reception in their own podcast Partial Historians. So we're very pleased to have you. Hello.Dr Rad 1:31Hey, thank you so much for having us.Dr G 1:34That was Dr Rad!Dr Rad 1:36To distinguish my voice.Dr G 1:38We'll just set that up straight. Yeah.Dr Rad 1:40Any stupid thing said by this voice are the property of Dr. Radford.Dr G 1:45And I'm Dr. G, thank you so much for having us.Alison Innes 1:48Well, we are very pleased to be connecting with you and I'm glad that we could work out the timezone difference. We're recording from Canada, as usual, in Ontario, and you're all the way around in Australia. So I we're very glad to be connecting with you.Dr Rad 2:01It's a it's a Commonwealth podcast.Alison Innes 2:04Yes. Yes, that truly international.Dr Rad 2:06Exactly.Alison Innes 2:07And I'm also excited to have you because we are going to talk about Medea, which everybody who listens to this probably knows by now is one of my favourite characters, but we're going to do it a little bit differently and have a look at Seneca's, Medea, and Darren and I are not as strong. Well, Darren, Darren knows knows this play better than I do. I have never formally taught or really studied this play. So I'm kind of, I'm the real student here. But we are really excited to have some Roman experts on board for this conversation.Dr Rad 2:38Excellent. Let's get into it.Dr G 2:40Yeah, so I think we should start with just a consideration briefly of who is Medea. Let's locate Seneca within the context of the subject matter.Dr Rad 2:50Yeah, true.Alison Innes 2:51All right. Well, Medea goes back a very long ways. Darren, do you want to give us a quick rundown on on her mythology?Darrin Sunstrum 2:58Well, in Medea, yeah. Like you said, she's one of those sort of older characters that that, you know, been probably kicking around since the Archaic period, more than likely. We, we encounter her at least on the Greek side of things in Euripides work about 431 BC. There were other playwrights like Nephron, for example, that wrote about Medea as a figure from this woman from Colchis from the Black Sea region, who is a foreigner, barbarian and mysterious sort of “Other” type character with associations and magic. And then her relationship with Jason and the Argonauts, which is a very old myth. Right, is picked up and, you know, use time and time again. So we see Medea, you know, in different iterations and tragedy, and lyric poetry, you know, here in our discussion with Seneca all the way into the Imperial Roman period, which I don't live in very much, but so it's a long stretch of time to have, you know, one sort of character called Medea. And you know what she is, and I think everyone knows what she's probably most responsible for, or her infamy or her fame. So, you know, she's a non-Greek character, but a very compelling and powerful female heroine in a catalogue of heroes that are primarily male.Dr Rad 4:26Yeah, the Romans seem to really be attracted to the story of Medea. I mean, obviously, when I say attracted, I don't necessarily mean in a hugely positive way. Because as you say, she is quite infamous. But yeah, they definitely seem to enjoy going back and back to the story of Medea.Dr G 4:43And I think there's something very compelling about Medea's story as well because bound up with it is the whole spectrum of human feeling. From everything from intense attraction and affection and love to like the bitterest of human sorrow possible. And she captures this within the arc of her life. And so there are so many elements of her story, I think, that people can hook into and repurpose. And when we talk about attraction, I think it's that compulsion. It's almost like things become so devastating in her life and in her mythic tales, that it's hard to look away.Alison Innes 5:24Yeah. And there's there are some key events that all of the different authors who we have, and presumably, from what I've read, there were a lot more plays and tales about Medea in the ancient world than survive that then have come down to us. But the broad outline, of course, is that Jason shows up with his Argonauts and he needs to get the Golden Fleece. Medea betrays her father and helps them out and in their flight from Chlocis back to Greece with Jason. She marries him and kills her brother. And then we are of course, located in Corinth, where Jason is now married the princess, but depending on which author you have, there's different nuances and different interpretations and different details for each of those. So it's a really flexible story that gets retold in a lot of different ways.Dr G 6:22Yeah, and I think we see this coming through with Seneca's Medea, it's a very formal kind of play. Very Roman, I would say in its structure. If we're, inevitably people will make comparisons with Seneca's work with the very famous Euripides play. And they're very different in structure, even though some of the messaging is similar. They get to the conclusion in very different ways. And one of the things that I think that tells us about Medea is just how she can be reinterpreted consistently over time for different audiences, while keeping some core features of the story. But while also shifting a lot of the contextual details around how that story unfolds,Darrin Sunstrum 7:08I like that because like, like, like any good myth, it's true. It's sort of adapts its dynamic, and it sort of serves its shape sort of fills the vessel in. And by that, I mean, it serves the audience at the time, or at least the narrator's agenda, whatever that might be. So I think the Medea characters are really plastic in that way.Dr G 7:26Yeah. So I think it's probably a good place to think about just the basic plot of Seneca's play. And we sort of we start off with a conversation happening outside between Medea she's alone on stage, actually, I should say, it's not a conversation just yet. But she's sort of like locating herself through this kind of soliloquy.Dr Rad 7:52She does like to have conversations with herself,Dr G 7:54She does like to have conversations, there's, it's a very, it's a very ancient play thing to do. Popular all the way through for centuries, really discussing sort of positioning the audience to understand history in a particular way, and help everybody come to grips with where we're at where we're up to in her life. And she's in Corinth. And this is a very typical place for plays about Medea to start as well. But from there, we sort of get into a whole sequence of events. And Seneca seems to like a sort of a really particular structure to his plays. And some editors of the Latin collections do like to divide it up like that, as well. So it feels like that we have distinct scenes, even though we're not really sure what any of the stage directions might have been. And so one of the really important character devices in Seneca's Medea is the role of the Chorus and the way that they tend to set up how you might interpret a particular set of action. And they also tend to be a marker point for a change of scene as well, either towards the end or towards the beginning. So the chorus has a lot to do with this. And we see this sort of like ebb and flow between Medea expressing herself having a conversation with Kreon, the king of Corinth about needing time before her exile takes place, having a conversation with Jason, where he's kind of like, you gotta get out of here. And she's like, I need more time to get organised. Where am I gonna go how I'm gonna live my life? And it's like, it's really important that you leave. And she's like, you know, You dumped me, right? I don't know that I should necessarily be bearing the brunt of your poor decision making because the reason why she has been asked to leave is she's now the third wheel, essentially, in her own life.Dr Rad 9:48Yeah, Jason no longer needs her. I mean, he's he's got a new wife and you shiny wife,Dr G 9:51Jason's about to marry a woman. He hasn't really told Medea about that. She's found out because she's about to be exiled. Like you need to leave and she's like, Excuse me?Dr Rad 10:00if only all breakups could go this way.Alison Innes 10:04Medea is really front and centre in this play too. Not only does she start off with the with the opening, but I have cannot put my finger on the exact statistic at the moment, but she has the vast majority of speaking lines in this play. So it's very much her driving the story.Dr Rad 10:22Oh, massively, it's definitely the Medea show. It definitely puts her more forward than you Euripides did, even though obviously, she's a huge part of Euripides as well.Dr G 10:32But we do get some sense from the sort of secondary characters that there are some concerns about how she's coping with the situation that she finds herself in. Rightly so as it turns out, so there's some good foreshadowing presented through the character of the Nurse, and discussions that happen that relate to the tutor of the children, they've got some concerns about what's happening. And fair enough. She's not taking things well. And she makes that abundantly clear through her spoken time on stage as well. But she does manage to negotiate with Kreon to have a day to get herself organised. And she makes it pretty clear early on that she's going to use this for vengeance. This is a pretty standard moment for Medea in terms of her representation in literature, first of all, buying the time, and then being like, Alright, now for the plan. And she does the grand reveal of…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Lars Tolumnius and the Fate of Fidenae Sep 15, 2022
    Show notes

    Vengeance for RomeIt's 437 BCE and Rome finds itself challenged by the king of the Etruscans Lars Tolumnius. But how did Rome get into this situation? In our previous episode, Rome took a break from domestic woes to deal with the execution of four ambassadors. These men had been sent to the colony of Fidenae, which had recently defected to the Etruscan city of Veii.The Romans are quick to engage in battle with the Etruscans and their allies. They secure a victory under the consuls, but it comes at a heavy price. They determine that this whole situation merits a dictator. Is there a problem that a dictator cannot solve? Apparently not, for the Romans start to enjoy a lot more success once they have Mamercus Aemilius in place.Episode 129 – Lars Tolumnius and the Fate of FidenaeA Map of the City of Veii. The time period of the city is not clear from the map. Source: Wikimedia CommonsTo the Victor Go the SpoilsMamercus has assembled a crack team to battle the Etruscan King Lars Tolumnius. This was the right move, as Lars Tolumnius is hell on horseback. Once the conflict has commenced, the king makes it mission to cause as much chaos for the Roman forces as possible. Fortunately for Mamercus, there is an aspiring hero amongst the Roman cavalry. Aulus Cornelius Cossus is a patrician hottie on a mission to make a name for himself or die trying. His exploits will become the stuff of legend. SPOILA ALERT – There may be spoila opima involved. Aulus Cornelius Cossus with the head of Lars Tolumnius. See this gruesome depiction in more detail here.Things to Look Out ForConfusion over the dating of events Handsome patrician soldiers Decapitations Rude military songsGolden crowns Triumphs Our Players 437 BCE Consuls M. Geganius M. f. – n. Macerinus – Pat. (Cos. 447, 443)L. Sergius C. F. C. n. Fidenas – Pat. – (Cos. 424, Mil. Tr. c. p. 433, 429, 418)Consul SuffectusM. Valerius M. f. M. n. Lactutua (or Lactucinus) Maximus – Pat.DictatorMam. Aemilius M.f. – n. Mamercinus – Pat. – Mil. Tr. c.p. 438Master of the HorseL. Quinctius L.f.L.n. Cincinnatus – Pat. – Cos. 428b, Mil. Tr. c.p. 438, 425, 420.Legates, Lieutenants M. Fabius Vibulanus – Pat. – Cos. 442, Mil. Tr. c.p. 433(T.) Quinctius Capitolinus (Barbatus) – Pat.Tribune of the SoldiersA Cornelius Cossus – Pat. – Cos. 428, Mil. Tr. c. p. 426Etruscan KingLars TolumniusOur SourcesDr G reads Diodorus Siculus, 12.43.1; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 12.5; Valerius Maximus, 3.2.4; Florus, 1.6.9; Plutarch, Life of Romulus, 16.7-8; Plutarch, Life of Marcellus, 7-8; Propertius, 4.10; Sextus Aurelius Victor, Lives of Illustrious Romans – ‘Aulus Cornelius Cossus'; Frontinus, Strategems, 2.8.9; Eutropius, 1.19.Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.17-20.Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War (University of California Press) Sound CreditsThanks to BBC Sounds, Fesliyan Studios, Orange Free Sounds and Sound Bible for sound effects, and the gifted Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music.“Mars of Todi” a life-size Etruscan bronze sculpture of a soldier making a votive offering c. 5th Century BCE. Those Etruscan were pretty niffy when it came to the arts! Source: Wikimedia CommonsAutomated TranscriptGenerated by Otter AI. Let's see how the AI copes with the Latin and tricky Australian accent this time round!Dr Rad 0:16Welcome to the Partial Historians,Dr G 0:20we explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:23Everything from the political scandals, the love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:34And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories.Dr Rad 0:43Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Welcome to another episode of the Partial Historians, I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad.Dr G 1:12And I'm Dr. G. And it's the history of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr Rad 1:19So let's recap where we were up to last time, Dr. G. So last episode, we talked about a teensy bit of 439, as far as I'm concerned, but it was mostly 438. And apart from the Maelius, shamoozle that we were clearing up on murder most foul, it would seem of an equestrian who's just trying to make it rain grain.Dr G 1:41And ended up in the pool of treachery!Dr Rad 1:44That's right. We had instead a switch from domestic problems to foreign problems.Dr G 1:51Yeah, there's nothing like in a Etruscan King to get under your skin.Dr Rad 1:54Indeed. So we had the introduction of Lars Tolumnius, an Etruscan KingDr G 2:00Of VeiiDr Rad 2:01Yes apparently comes into our orbit because basically, the Romans had established a colony at a place called Fidenae. And they had decided to switch their allegiance from the Romans to the city of Veii which is Etruscan and hence the involvement of an Etruscan King.Dr G 2:19Hmm.Dr Rad 2:20And when the Romans sent for ambassadors to be why you got to be that way, while you leaving us, yeah, their response was apparently to cut their heads off, which may have been on the orders of Lars, or he might have actually been doing something else trying to multitask and ended up in a very messy situation.Dr G 2:41Also, it's a bit of a mess if you think about it, because these are Roman historians trying to tell us what's going on with Fidenae, and it seems like they can't credit Fidenae with coming up with this idea for themselves.Dr Rad 2:57And Livy certainly is on the side of Tolumnius ordering the murder, or at least making it seem like he was ordering a murder because he wanted Fidenae to be committed to this revolt that they were in.Dr G 3:13Yeah, man on the ground.Dr Rad 3:15Yeah, so we ended up with four ambassadors who lost their heads, but once the statues in the city of RomeDr G 3:22Headless statues?Dr Rad 3:26I didn't mention that one was called Ickabod. Anyway, so that was really where we were up to with 438 which means Dr G that it's time to travel into 437 BCE.Dr G 3:57It's 437 BCE and Dionysus of Halicarnassus my major source? Yes. cuts back in partway through this year. I'll have some things to tell you. Yeah, but let us start with the multitude of characters. This is like a cast of 1000sDr Rad 4:14It is yeah 437 seems to be quite the year to a Roman andDr G 4:18it is if you're gonna get famous and have a big part in Roman history, it might be in this year. We have consuls are returned to the consulship everybody. Marcus Geganius, son of Marcus grandson of we don't know who Macerinus. And Lucius Sergius, Son of Gaius, grandson of Gaius Fidenas.Dr Rad 4:43Coincidence? I think not.Dr G 4:45a patrician Yes. So and we also have and this is perhaps a foreshadowing of things to come in this year. A suffect consul as well. Do you usually only get those when you have to replace one of the other consuls for some reason? Yeah.Dr Rad 4:59You have to suffer the suffect.Dr G 5:02and this is Marcus Valerius son of Marcus grandson of Manius Lactutua or Lactucinus – which sounds maybe more more Latin – Maximus soDr Rad 5:18It's sounds like breastfeed breastfeedingDr G 5:20handful of a name handful of a man. And then we also have a dictatorDr Rad 5:26So soon?Dr G 5:27So soon you say, yes, we've entered the era of dictators, dear listeners, so be on the lookout Mamercus Aemilius son of Marcus grandson of we don't know who Mamercinus.Dr Rad 5:41There's one that I really struggled with last time so so it's Mamercus Aemilius is Namur kindness or mana sinus,Dr G 5:51okay? Yes, he was one of the military tributes with concealer power from the previous year.Dr Rad 5:56I wish the Romans wouldn't have tongue twister names.It's not good for the English we needed to be raised on romance language. But there is the master of the horse to accompany the dictator course. And that is the young Cincinnatus – famous in all the wrong ways. And now he's back on the scene.Yeah. So he also was from the previous year if I remember correctly.Dr G 6:18One of the military tributes with consular power. Yeah. So two buddies hooking up again for another year of fun together.And that's after his daddy. As in Cincinnatus daddy had just been dictated himself.Yeah, maybe not. Yeah, so now he's stepping through the ranks.Absolutely.We've also got a couple of legates mentioned Marcus Fabius Vibulanus with Fabian Yeah, he was previously consul in 442. So quite recently, yeah. And who we think is Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus. ForDr Rad 6:51Oh for heaven's sake. Will that man ever retire?Dr G 6:55No. And also somebody known as the tribute of the soldiers in my account. Yes. We'll see how this goes for him. Yes, but hold on to your horses. This is the name out of all of that list. The one to remember Aulus Cornelius Cossus.Dr Rad 7:11Yeah, yeah, that's what I've got to Yeah,Dr G 7:14a patrician. And there's going to be some interesting things going on with old Cossus. So yeah, keep your ears peeled.Dr Rad 7:22Oh, my goodness. So clearly, we're in for quite a year if we got this many magistrates on our cards. It soundsDr G 7:27like a Roman disaster already. What is going on?Dr Rad 7:33I know, I basically we've got this situation, right, where war is clearly on the horizon, because you can't just ignore the fact that four of your ambassadors just had their heads cut off.Dr G 7:44It is awkward, but to ignore it would make it worse. Yeah.Dr Rad 7:47You can't kind of know the murder on sir. Fortunately, there is no conflict over the issue of the levy. Because the Plebeians and the tribunes are sensible enough at this time around Dr. G, to know that brain needs to come together. They need to unite, because that's the only way they're going to be able to deal with the Etruscans.Dr G 8:12Oh, yes, because laws to learn this is still on the scene.Dr Rad 8:15So because obviously rooms in a bit of a difficult situation, no surprises the plebeians, and the tribunes don't raise any objections to consuls being elected this time around, because they understand that unity is important in this moment here. And so we have as we mentioned before, Marcus Geganius Macerinus and Lucius Sergius Fidenas now Livy, he mentions here and we are going to come back to this guy's name, that he thinks he got this name because of the war that he was fighting. So obviously fighting to get back to the colony if we need to restore things to how they should be in the Roman mindset. And he got this name apparently, because he was the first man to fight a successful battle on this side of the Anio. Against Lars Tolumnius. However, he does highlight that this was not a battle that was easily won. So a lot of the Romans are obviously pretty sad, because so many people died in this battle. And therefore, even though they did win, it was a bit of a tricky situation. Rome's not in exactly the place it wants to be. And so the Senate ended up deciding that they want to appoint a dictator, the Mamercus Aemilius, and he chooses as his master of the horse, another guy who's sprung up from the year that we were just talking about who'd been a military tribute with consular authority, none other than Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus or Cincinnatus Jr, who is described as being a young man worthy of his father and therefore I have conceived and instantaneous dislike to him. Yeah, anyway, so the consuls of course help out here. They decided they're going to, you know, levy the troops and they make sure that they include some veteran Centurions amongst the number. Guess they think they can be facing quite the fight here which is a fair call. The Etruscans are pretty powerful at this point. Yep. So dictator Mamercus orders type Titus Quinctius Capitolinus and Marcus Fabius Vibulanus to be his lieutenants and that's where they come into. Ah, okay. Yeah, so they're gonna be serving underneath him. And of course, they're from pretty elite clans. I got the connections gratis Fabians.Dr G 10:27Hard to resist a fabulous Fabian.Dr Rad 10:29Exactly. Yes. So you know it gets pedigree going on here. Yeah, what Livy points out here is that when the right man is chosen to be dictator of Rome. And when that position so high and mighty is united with that correct, man, well, there's no one that can stand in Rome's way. That's just the way it works. The position is elite. The man is elite. Such a marriage in heaven. So anyway, that's just I think a bit of a hint about where this is all going about how it's all going to go for Rome.Livy's got his narrative knickers in a twist. Yeah,exactly. So as a result, the Romans carry off. They're able to push the enemy right out of their territory across the Anio River, the enemy, the Etruscans, they ended up withdrawing into their camp, and they set themselves up on the hills between Fidenae and the Anio river. And they are not going to come down into the plains until the forces of the Faliscans come to help them. Then the Etruscans themselves set up camp before the wolves of Findae the Roman dictator retires to his camp, which was also obviously in the area to prepare for battle. Now, this is where in the enemy camp there is a little bit of problems, because not everyone is convinced about what the next move should be. These Faliscans are kind of restless, because they're away from their home territory, and they're feeling you know, pretty confident. Okay, pretty, pretty ready for things they're definitely keen to, you know, get right back into things here. But the people of Veii and Fidenae they want to take a slower approach. Okay. I think you know, what time might be on our side here. Okay, so King Tolumnius, thinks, you know what? I agree with my fellow people here, I think that slow and steady might win the race here against the Romans. Okay. I mean, they're clearly raring to go. Okay,Dr G 12:44We wouldn't want to give them the satisfaction.Dr Rad 12:46Yeah. However, I think he feels a bit emasculated because he's got these Falsicans FalIScans is such a weird name for people. And I think he feels like It'd be embarrassing for him not to just go right into it not to launch straight ahead.Dr G 13:04Lars, Lars, Lars, this is how you lose.Dr Rad 13:06Yeah, so he and he didn't want to obviously lose their faith. He doesn't want them to go back home and be like, You know what, if you're not going to use us, we're just going to go back home, because they clearly want to go back. And I'm enjoying this little holiday of this. So he decides he is going to fight the very next day. Now meanwhile, the Romans and their dictator I feeling very positive because somehow they seem to know that there's some hesitation amongst the enemy about what it is that they're going to be doing. So the Romans start threatening that they're going to attack the cat that they're going to attack the city of Fidenae if the enemy doesn't enter battle, so they're going to bring the battle to then if they are like, reluctant to fight or something like that Romans posturing, so the armies phased out the the armies March and they are facing off against each other. Now they have sent across some extra men and they've dispatched a particular party across the mountains to attack the Roman camp during the fighting clever because presumably then the Romans you know, attention will be diverted and they…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Partial Recap – The 440s BCE Aug 18, 2022
    Show notes

    This is our short scripted summary of what the ancient sources tell us about the events of the 440s BCE. If you would like more detail and analysis, be sure to check out our regular episodes from the Foundation of Rome series.

    The Partial Recap for the 440s BCE

    To pick up our detailed episodes for this period, we recommend starting with Episode 109 – The First Decemvirate. Although the decemvirs come to power in c. 451 BCE, their story has so much influence on the decade of the 440s that you simply wouldn't want to miss it!

    Image of the Forum courtesy of Benson Kua via Flickr.

    Transcript for the 440s BCE

    Introduction

    FR – Welcome to the Partial Recap for the 440s BCE!

    PG – I’m Dr G

    FR – and I’m Dr Rad

    PG – and this is our highlights edition of the 440s in Rome. We’ll take you through from 449 to 440 in an epitome of our normal episodes.

    FR – Perfect for those mornings when you don’t want some lengthy rhetoric with your coffee – but please be warned – this episode contains references to murder, violence and sexual assault.

    PG – Get ready for a recappuccino.

    449 BCE

    • It’s hard to believe, but when the 440s dawned, Rome was still in the grip of the second decemvirate. Quelle horreur!
    • 449 BCE was simply jam-packed with developments – it’s almost too much to believe… so we have no time to waste!
    • The days of the decemvirate were numbered. On top of the threat of external enemies, these guys really know how to get their fellow Romans offside.
    • The decemvirs arrange the murder of the highly popular plebeian, Lucius Siccius Dentatus. He’s been speaking out against them far too much, but he’s too highly regarded to kill outright. His death is staged carefully, so that it does not arouse suspicion.
    • Pretty awful stuff, but that’s nothing compared to their next act.
    • One of the most prominent decemvirs, the uber-patrician Appius Claudius, is seized with a desire for a plebeian maiden, Verginia.
    • He tries all sorts of legal tricks to get his paws on her, and it seems like he might succeed, in spite of strenuous opposition from her family.
    • In desperation to protect his daughter’s virginity, and by extension his family’s honour, her father ends up seizing a nearby knife and stabbing her to death in the Forum.
    • Verginia’s body is displayed to the crowd, a horrible symbol of the excesses of the Second Decemvirate
    • The plebeians are outraged – and this time, they are not alone. Some of the patricians aren’t that impressed with this tyrannical regime either.
    • Patricians Valerius and Horatius start standing up to Appius Claudius and his gang of decemvirs.
    • Meanwhile, Verginius has fled Rome after murdering his daughter. He makes contact with some of Rome’s armed forces and convinces them to revolt against the decemvirs.
    • A secession of the plebs quickly follows. The plebeians gave the senate an ultimatum – it’s the decemvirs or us!
    • Thanks to some skilful negotiation between Valerius and Horatius, the plebs return to the state and the decemvirs resign.
    • The consulship is restored and given to Varlius and Horatius.
    • This dynamic duo pass the Valerio-Horatian Laws, which restored the sacrosanctity of the tribune of the plebs, restored the right of citizens to appeal, and made the decisions of plebeians binding on all Romans.
    • And there’s some vengeance to be sought against the decemvirs now that they are back on the same level as everyone else.
    • The biggest fish to fry? Well, that would be Appius Claudius, who is pursued by the new tribune of the plebs, Verginius. But before he is officially condemned, he dies in custody under extremely shady circumstances.
    • It seems like some of the tribunes might be getting big ideas

    448 BCE

    • From the incredible detail of 449 BCE, we turn to the blankness of 448 BCE
    • In 448 BCE the consuls were Lars (or Sp.) Herminius Cortinesanus and Titus Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus
    • Weirdly, some of the plebeian tribunes were patrician ex-consuls.
    • Understandably, not everyone is thrilled by this development, and so a fellow tribune, Lucius Trebonius, fights to preserve the integrity of tribune elections.

    447 BCE

    • In 447 BCE the consuls were Marcus Geganius Macerinus and Caius Iulius
    • They appeased the plebs by suspending a levy for a war against the Volscians and Aequians
    • Unfortunately, the young patricians start acting out again and committing acts of violence against the plebs, and even the tribunes themselves.
    • No one seemed to be able to keep them in check… or to at least, no one with power was that invested in keeping them in check.

    446 BCE

    • In 446 BCE the consuls were Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus and Agrippa Furius
    • The Romans were facing a combined force of Aequians and the Volscians who could smell their internal issues from just a few miles away… because they were pretty close.
    • Riding high on their recent victory, the Romans are called in to settle a border dispute between the cities of Aricia and Ardea.
    • The people make the terrible decision to take the land for themselves

    445 BCE

    • And in 445 BCE, their greed is causing problems in Ardea, where a revolt has broken out
    • The consuls for the year were Marcus Genucius Augurinus and Caius Curtius Philo
    • Not only were these men facing revolt in Ardea, but attack from the Veientes, Aequians and Volscians
    • However, the plebeians, led by the tribune Caius Canuleius, refused to fight unless one of the laws passed by the second decemvirate was overturned. This law had forbidden intermarriage between patricians and plebeians.
    • They also demanded a share in the consulship.
    • The horror felt by the patricians at this suggestion cannot be described.
    • After a lot of angst, a compromise is reached – the marriage law will be overturned and a new position was introduced – military tribunes with consular power.

    444 BCE

    • In 444 BCE the military tribunes with consular power were Aulus Sempronius Atratinus, Lucius Atilius Luscus and Titus Cloelius Sicilus
    • Unfortunately, it seems there were some issues with the auspices surrounding their inauguration and so an interrex was called in to sort the situation – Titus Quinctius Barbatus
    • They were soon replaced with actual consuls – Lucius Papirius Mugillanus and Lucius Sempronius Atratinus
    • Ardean ambassadors arrived, needing to discuss the ramifications of Rome’s decision to take their land

    443 BCE

    • In 443 BCE the consuls were Marcus Geganius Macerinus and Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus
    • It was time for a census… except the consuls were less than thrilled with the prospect of paperwork and administration.
    • This led to the creation of the office of the censor, and the selection of Lucius Papirius Mugillanus and Lucius Sempronius Atratinus to oversee the work.
    • Their bureaucratic glory was overshadowed by the eruption of civil war in Ardea.
    • A family disagreement over the marriage of a hot plebeian girl quickly exploded into a hot Ardean mess. Only Rome could save them now!
    • Hello, sweet atonement.

    442 BCE

    • In 442 BCE the consuls were Marcus Fabius Vibulanus and Postumus Aebutius Helva Cornicen
    • Still trying to atone for their greed over the Ardean land grab, the ROmans send out a triumviri coloniae deducendae – or three guys to set up a colony.
    • The sneaky plan is to give land in this colony back to the native people, before any Romans received a blade of grass.
    • Peace, peace at last!

    441 BCE

    • In 441 BCE the consuls were Gaius Furius Pacilus Fusus and Marcus Papirius Crassus
    • What better way to finish off the decade than with some games… that were promised a decade ago by the decemvirs.
    • Poetelius, one of the tribunes of the plebs, tried his darndest to get the plebeians some land or something, but he had no luck.

    440 BCE

    • In 440 BCE the consuls were Proculus Geganius and Lucius Menenius Lanatus
    • And sadly, the decade did not finish well for Rome.
    • A terrible famine hit, and the patricians and plebs quickly turned on each other
    • Lucius Minucius was elected prefect of the corn-supply but did not have a huge amount of success. It seems like the situation got real dark, real quick
    • Desperate times called for desperate measures – an equestrian named Spurius Maelius used his personal fortune to buy corn from Etruria and distributed it for nothing, making him very popular with the plebs.
    • Maelius let this all go to his head and started plotting to become king.
    • How weird to begin and end the decade with schemes for the ultimate domination of Rome?

    Conclusion

    FR – And that was the 440s in Ancient Rome… or was it?

    PG – Remember, this has just been the highlights from the ancient sources, so if you want to delve into the complexities of the different evidence from this period, check out our narrative episodes.

    FR – Thanks for joining us for this Partial Recap!

    Sound Credits for the 440s BCE

    Music courtesy of the amazing Bettina Joy de Guzman.

    For our full show notes and edited transcripts, head on over to https://partialhistorians.com/


    Support the show

    Patreon

    Ko-Fi


    Read our books

    Rex: The Seven Kings of Rome

    Your Cheeky Guide to the Roman Empire

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Mopping Up Maelius Aug 11, 2022
    Show notes

    The Aftermath of a Murder Rome has just experienced a scandal like no other. A terrible famine had hit in the years 440-439 BCE, and this had caused political chaos. The patrician appointed to secure grain, Lucius Minucius, had not experienced much success. Into the void stepped a wealthy equestrian named Spurius Maelius.Maelius either allowed his newfound popularity as the bringer of grain to go to his head and started plotting to seize control of Rome, or he was foisted into power by the people. Either way, his journey ended in a bloody stabbing, thanks to Master of the Horse, Servilius Ahala. Did Maelius incite the violence, or was Ahala a secret assassin? It is no wonder that we have some mopping up to do. Things are very messy.Episode 128 – Mopping Up MaeliusSome classical reception in action with this Statue of Cincinnatus at his plough in Cincinnati, Ohio, Courtesy of Wikimedia CommonsGet the Mop, and the Bulldozer Cincinnatus, our possible dictator for 439 BCE, gave instructions for the house of Maelius to be destroyed and turned into a memorial to his crazy plans. The site became known as the Aequimaelium, and it was located on the Vicus Iugarius. The man who revealed Maelius' treachery, Lucius Minucius, received his own ox and a gilded statue outside the Porta Trigemina. Less pleasantly, the severed heads of the traitors were placed on display by a pool in the Forum (the Lacus Servilius). What better place to reflect on poor choices. There are strange parallels in this history and other periods in Roman history which can make one dubious of this whole affair. However, mopping up Maelius seems to have produced a number of physical reminders that were still a feature of Rome many centuries later. Snitches Get Stitches?On top of the statue, Lucius Minucius was transferred to the plebeian class and made a tribune of the plebs. Record scratch! Are snitches supposed to get lots of honours? They do if it benefits the powers-that-be in Rome! This might be a sign that the patricians were still wary after Maelius and wanted one of their men on the inside. One who was known to be a tattle-tale.That's One Way to Say NoThe political scene might have settled down in the city, but Rome was about to be dealt a brutal blow from a colony. Fidenae decided to throw their lot in with Veii, an Etruscan city under the control of King Lars Tolumnius. Rome could hardly ignore such a betrayal and despatched four envoys. The people of Fidenae were not familiar with the saying, ‘Don't shoot the messenger' and executed these men. There is some confusion over their extreme actions. Lars Tolumnius was suspected of having orchestrated the deaths in an attempt to bind Fidenae closer to Veii. How will Rome respond to such an insult? Tune in to find out!Our Players 439 BCEConsulsAgrippa Menenius T. f. Agripp. n. Lanatus (Pat.)T. Quinctius L.f. L.n. Capitolinus Barbatus (Pat.) – Cos. 471, 468, 465, 446, 443.DictatorL. Quinctius L. f. L. n. Cincinnatus (Pat.) – Cos. Suff. 460Master of the HorseC. Servilius – f. – n. Ahala (Pat.)Praefectus AnnonaeL. Minucius (Esquilinus Augurinus) (Pat.) – Cos. Suff. 458Wealthy EquestrianSpurius MaeliusOur Players 438 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerMam. Aemilius (M.f. – n. Mamercinus?) (Pat.)L. Quinctius L.f.L.n. Cincinnatus (Pat.) – Cos. 428b, Mil. Tr. c.p. 425, 420.L. (or C.) Iulius – f. – n. Iullus (Pat.) – Cos. 430.Legates, AmbassadorsC. FulciniusCloelius Tullus (Pat.)Sp. AntiusL. RosciusTribune of the PlebsQ. CaeciliusQ. IuniusSex. TitiniusEtruscan KingLars TolumniusOur SourcesDr G reads Diodorus Siculus, 12.38Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.16-17.Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Sound CreditsThanks to BBC Sounds, Orange Free Sounds and Sound Bible for sound effects, and the lovely Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music.Domenico Beccafumi 1535. Gaius Servilius Ahala presenting the body of Spurius Maelius to CincinnatusAutomated Transcript Provided by Otter AI. Apologies as always – AI readers do struggle not only with Latin but also Australian accents!Dr Rad 0:16Welcome to the partial historians,Dr G 0:19we explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything fromDr Rad 0:23the political scandals, the levels as the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:34And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories.Dr Rad 0:43Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 1:02Hello, and welcome to a brand new episode of the partial historians. I am one of your hosts, Dr. G. And sitting beside me looking incredible as always start to read. I'm spurious furious today.Dr GI'm a feminist witch apparently, yeah, Dr RadThis is for those listening to the audio only version of the podcast.Dr G 1:27And we are deep in the history of Rome from the founding of the city, really. And were well into what is the early republic at this point? Dr RadI would say we are. So I'd like to do a bit of a recap, if I may, Dr. G. I mean, I don't know if it's possible to recap all the things that we went through last episode, but I'm gonna give it a shot. Go for it. So we were dealing with the character spurious Malleus and upstart equestrian. Also, the sources would have us believe a man who makes the grain rain down on Rome. That's right. He's not like, he's more like DDTDr G 2:07imagined small little grains falling out my face. But I am hungry, and from my mouth. Dr RadYeah. So spring Ismailia come along, during this time where room seems to be experiencing a grain shortage. And it's not the only time in the early republic that Rome would go through this problem. I mean, we've talked before about the fact that this century, particularly this middle part that we're in right now does seem to be a particularly tough time for Rome. And that's not just going by the little hints we get in the sources, like this one talking about a bad famine, but also the archaeology, which we've mentioned before. Yeah, there seems to be less building projects. There's just sort of less growth and expansion all round. And it seems like it's not just Rome, it seems to be most of the Latin region, at the very least, if not greater Italy as well. Yeah. Which would explain why they were struggling to get some green from the neighbour. Everyone's like, I need to hold on to my supplies. can't share. I can't spare a square.Dr G 3:08Yeah, so we had this issue and screws, Malleus had taken it upon himself to use his private fortune to try and restore the balance to bring grain back to room. But this didn't go down well, with everybody did it? It did. No, no, it went badly enough that things got out of hand. Yeah. And violence ensued. Dr RadIndeed. And we had such conflicting accounts. So I, I was actually so blown away, that I couldn't really even process it last time, which is why I wanted to do quite an in depth recap this time. Okay. First of all, when we're talking about spruce malleus, depending on which account you are following, there are slightly different periods of scientists. So for me, it was definitely a blend of 440 and 439. Whereas, because we're missing Dionysius, we really could only pick up the narrative in the main pattern for 39 years, right? Correct. Yes, exactly. But thanks to your super research skills, we did get that tidbit from plenty, which seem to indicate that famine was coming because we have that story. But the other dude who lowered the price, low price, we did have a what it said an eight all of the grain suppliers actually lower the price right down. So we've got this sort of foreshadowing that things are bad, yes, on the grain front and the supply. So what we were dealing with was the fact that there was officially appointed a guy called the nucleus to be the prefect of the crane because he was meant to be the guy solving the grand crisis. So of course, he didn't take it well, when this other guy was showing him up. Even worse, he took it really badly when people shoved him off his magisterial chair and put my alias on instead being like, this guy knows how to solve the grain problem. He is solving the same problem. You sir, say you're solving the grain problem, but or not exactly to see that was only in your account, my curiosity to figure this all out. So first of all, I have seen it said, Dr. G, that the idea of having a prefect of the grain supply might be a little anachronisticDr G 5:18time look, that would not surprise me at all. And I think there, it's pretty fair to say that what we're seeing with this kind of narrative, this early Republic is a bit of a mix and match of the things that come up with grain supply. Yeah, that really concerned the Romans in the late Republic, and the parallels with the issue of the gracchi. And what happens there is playing on historians minds when they write about this early period. And I don't think there's any way to disentangle that kind of mess, because the Romans that are writing these annalistic histories like Libya and Dionysus of how it can assist them very much of the opinion that that greerton grain crisis is the way to understand grain supply in Rome. And we're not going to ruin that story for you, because you're going to have to tune in to when we get to like 133 BCE to find out what's going on with the IraqiDr Rad 6:13is to date for 10 years. When we finally get to that point. We will see you there. Yeah, absolutely. So first of all, I would like to say that I did make a bit of a boo boo last time, I accidentally said I know that Manoukian has had a history, the American family Sorry, I had a history with Korea laners which is partly true, but this specific Manoukian has a history with Cincinnatus, which is what I know. Okay. Now, the reason why I bring that up again, is not just to acknowledge my slight misstep there, but also because we had this appointment of Cincinnatus as dictator, and him choosing as his master of the horse. Aha. Oh, yeah, exactly. Now, the appointment of Cincinnatus as dictator is another thing. I think that the scholarship has been like, really? Is he really, because and this is the interesting thing about the history of Manoukian is not only does the Manoukian family have a history of dealing with green issues in the past, going all the way back to the early republic. But there is this personal history where Manoukian this Manoukian has got into trouble in 458 BCE, militarily and was bailed out by Cincinnatus. Oh,Dr G 7:35okay, so we're talking some like, pretty unique connections. Yeah.Dr Rad 7:39So is this another parallel where Manoukian has been appointed prefect of the green supply isn't doing a great job. In fact, there's obviously a pretty serious problem going on if your account is correct. And he's actually been kicked out of office by just a random group of people. I mean, I hope it's true. On the flip side. Yes, exactly. And in that case, is Cincinnatus coming to his rescue? Once again, do I know so there's some weird parallels in the story there? So I'm just gonna highlight that. But now let's talk about Malleus. Again, dodgy? Oh, let's. So we did mention last episode that he does seem to be one of these people that I feel like the patricians in particular have a problem with now the question is, of course, is even real.Dr G 8:31Do they have imaginary problems?Dr Rad 8:34I think the randoms do have imaginary problems all the time. But the fact that there is this blending in my account, and probably in yours, if we had it between 440 and 439, that actually is kind of breaking with annalistic tradition a bit, isn't it? Because we talked about how the fact that they like to have everything sort of neatly tied up in one year. But the way that this is kind of messily spread from 440. And really into like, the different talk about the aftermath into 438, that maybe lends some support for it being a real person and not just someone who was created to, you know, make a point or something like that.Dr G 9:11I think this also fits into the broader issues that we're facing with our narratives right now, which we've just entered into this period where you can not only have consoles, but you can also have military Tribune's with consular power. Now, what we're going to see for this and this is a bit of foreshadowing is probably about a 50 year stretch of things being quite confusing, politically, and narratively, and being able to confine events to a single year as analysts would like to do. Yes, gonna be a bit tricky because some of this is not going to be easily tied up. It's going to spill over. People aren't going to be sure what's going on and they don't know where they stand. And we're gonna see a lot of dictators just say,Dr Rad 9:54excellent. We'll see this is the interesting thing. I mean, so we have Cincinnati's being mentioned Is that a legitimate connection? That probably seems like the shady is part to me? Because as has been highlighted again, in the academia, he doesn't really do much. No. I mean,Dr G 10:12is there a marriage that we don't know about?Dr Rad 10:14It's weird. Like the previously when we've seen Cincinnatus in action, he does actually take centre stage. Now I know he's an old man atDr G 10:23something at this point, maybe, you know, he's like, I'm retiring guys, this is my last ones.Dr Rad 10:27Exactly. Like I know that he would be older. And I know that he's not necessarily the federal character. I mean, he's definitely not the federal character here. They're trying to explain other things. But it just does seem a little off, that he'd be involved and yet, not involved. You know? It's a bit weird there. But you do have sources other than Livia. Dionysius mentioning him. So Cicero also mentions that Cincinnatus was made dictator to deal whisperer Ismailia. Specifically,Dr G 10:56yeah, I didn't know that. Yeah, I don't have huge doubts, necessarily, that it's an artist is doing some stuff. Yeah. Now whether it's this old guy, Cincinnatus classics in scenarios, or whether actually they might be Miss attributing something that should be going to his son. I think that's maybe a question that could be a little bit open, because we do see his son enter into politics quite soon after this point in the narrative as well. Yeah, definitely.Dr Rad 11:21And then we've also got we as we know, we've got a lot of quick di on the scene. We have capital liners again being a consular this year. So potentially, it's also that family connections. So maybe Cincinnatus was around. But it's hard to say. But certainly, there do seem to be points to this story in terms of what our sources are trying to achieve. And some of them are what might seem like fairly minor points, I suppose. Like explaining how the name a holla came up.Unknown Speaker 11:53Oh,Dr Rad 11:55exactly what she was doing really well, last time, which had to do with like the armpit, which just sounds so disgusting. I don't know why you would want that. It's yourDr G 12:02way you hide your dagger before you go into the forum, obviously.Dr Rad 12:05Yeah, exactly. It's also trying to explain something that's going to hap…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Assassination of Spurius Maelius Jul 14, 2022
    Show notes

    Famine Strikes After a peaceful year in 441 BCE, the Romans are in for nasty shock over the course of 440 and 439 BCE. It all begins with a crippling famine, and there seems to have been signs of problems ahead before the food shortage really set in. In Pliny the Elder, there is a reference to an aedile of the plebs (Marcus Marcius) selling grain to the poor at a very low price. Episode 127 – The Assassination of Spurius Maelius There are some startling differences in our source material this episode. What we can agree on is that the crisis was so severe, Lucius Minucius was appointed as Prefect of the Grain, aka The Nacho King of Rome. His job was to track down some corn and get it the Romans ASAP. Image of a random assortment of grains courtesy of www.themindfulword.org Emergency Relief Unfortunately, Minucius seems to have been incompetent and the famine dragged on. To try and help out his fellow Romans, a wealthy equestrian named Spurius Maelius made use of his extensive connections to secure the needed grain. He succeeds where Minucius had failed, and even worse, he distributes the corn for FREE to the populace. Nothing makes you so popular as distributing free food, especially if it’s amid a famine. There’s Only So Much Room at the Top Maelius’ actions highlight the enormous power that the aristocrats of Rome still wielded thanks to their wealth and the practice of patronage. However, Maelius does not seem to have been one of the ‘club’. He does not seem to have been one of the patricians. Exactly what impact this had is difficult to determine. Did his popularity go to his head and lead to schemes of restoring the monarchy? Was Cincinnatus dusted off and brought out of retirement to deal with this threat? Did the people seize control and replace Minucius with Maelius? Was there a senatorial conspiracy to kill those who spoke out against the government… including Maelius? Are we dealing with a state-sanctioned assassination? Or is this an elaborate cover-up? (Hello, JFK conspirators? We’ve got another one to add to the list….) We will leave that to you to decide. All we can say for certain is that this episode is full of intrigue. Never has Ancient Rome seemed more like a gangster film. Get ready for the assassination of Spurius Maelius! Things to Look Out For The young patricians Roman units of measurement The return of the butcher’s stand in the Forum Cincinnatus possibly pulling a Lethal Weapon When Dr Rad accidentally says that Minucius was rescued by Coriolanus instead of Cincinnatus back in 458 BCE A Master of the Horse with a name that we just can’t leave alone! Our Players 440 BCE Consuls Proculus Geganius – f. – n. Macerinus (Pat.) T. Menenius Agripp. F. Agripp. n. Lanatus (Pat.) – Cos. 452 OR L. Menenius T. f. Agripp. n. Lanatus (Pat.) Aedile of the Plebs M. Marcius Praefectus Annonae L. Minucius (Esquilinus Augurinus) (Pat.) – Cos. Suff. 458 Wealthy Equestrian – Giddyup! Spurius Maelius Our Players 439 BCE Consuls Agrippa Menenius T. f. Agripp. n. Lanatus (Pat.) T. Quinctius L.f. L.n. Capitolinus Barbatus (Pat.) – Cos. 471, 468, 465, 446, 443. Dictator L. Quinctius L. f. L. n. Cincinnatus (Pat.) – Cos. Suff. 460 Master of the Horse C. Servilius – f. – n. Ahala (Pat.) Praefectus Annonae L. Minucius (Esquilinus Augurinus) (Pat.) – Cos. Suff. 458 Wealthy Equestrian Spurius Maelius Our Sources Dr G reads Diodorus Siculus, 12.36; Cicero, Cato Maior De Senectute, 16.56; Cicero, Mil. 3.8; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 12.1-4; Valerius Maximus, 5.3.2g. Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.12-15. Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association) Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis) Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Wilson, M. 2021. Dictator: The Evolution of the Roman Dictatorship (University of Michigan Press). Sound Credits Thanks to BBC Sounds, Orange Free Sounds and Fesliyan Studios for sound effects, and the very talented Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music. Automated Transcript Provided by Otter AI P H 0:16 Welcome to the Partial Historians, we explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything from the political scandals, the love of ours, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I’m Dr. Rad. And I’m Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman Sword by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories. Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city. Dr Rad 1:00 Welcome to a brand new episode of the partial historias. I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad, and I am Dr. G. And we are super excited to be here today because we’re about to talk about 440 BCE. The speed of our Dr G 1:20 chain, getting getting from the foundations, and we’re about what 300 Something use it. We’re doing pretty good. I think so I mean, lightning was like 300 years have passed. It does not look incredible. Thank you. Thank you. Dr Rad 1:34 So in the course of the history of Rome, Dr. G, let’s do a brief recap of where we were up to last episode. Oh, yes. Yeah. 441 was actually quite a. Dr G 1:46 Yeah, look, I don’t remember much about it. There was all day I was involved. And we had just cleaned up the whole mess. And it was a bit of a mess there. Yeah. And then I feel like I ran out of sources. No, that’s not to say he really wasn’t Dr Rad 2:01 much to say about 441. It was Dr G 2:04 fairly, it was a pretty minimal. Yeah, Dr Rad 2:07 yeah. Exactly. After the drama that happened with the border dispute, no doubt. And that whole weird civil war that apparently broke out there over a hot Peruvian girl. So yes, it was good to have some peace and quiet. You know, your life can’t be keeping up with the Kardashians. 24/7 DG Dr G 2:25 It can’t sometimes you got to go home. Yeah. So that’s really all DR Dr Rad 2:29 I have to say about 441. So I think it’s time to pause as we transition into 440 BC. DG Dr G 2:44 Morning, Yep, see DR Dr Rad 2:45 ya. Oh, boy. DG Dr G 2:47 Do I have some news for you? We’ve got consoles this year? DR Dr Rad 2:50 Yes. Because you might recall that it has been mooted that maybe we don’t have consoles. And that maybe we have military Tribune’s with consular authority. Because then poor beings can technically hold the office without dirtying up too much. Technically. Yeah, we also, we also haven’t seen much action from that. From that side of things. It’s mostly been consoles. DG Dr G 3:15 That just that we’re getting that’s coming through from the source material is this is a time of uncertainty. There’s a volatility in the politics. Yeah. So what how that’s exactly playing out. We’re not really sure. And for me, in particular, reading Dionysius of Halicarnassus is a bit of an issue because this is precisely the point where he starts to go missing. And I’ve only got some fragments to deal with. makes me very sad. But we do have two consoles. The first of which I’ll test these names against you. We’ve got propolis giganteum. Sort of we don’t know who grandson of we don’t know who mas arenas check a patrician and Titus mineus Agrippa Oh, no. TinyMCE mineus Son of a grip ah. Grandson of a grip up Alanna Tess. Or might be Lucia Smith. Aeneas, DR Dr Rad 4:06 we’re not sure about is that leave you guys with which means it must be the correct. Yeah, yes. Apart from that, Ted, I DG Dr G 4:14 agree with you. And I also have a record of somebody called the Adel of the plebs. So this role doesn’t come up very often, or at least it’s not spoken about very often in this early period. DR Dr Rad 4:25 Well, that’s because we’re not entirely sure it does exist at this point. DG Dr G 4:30 But Be on the lookout for somebody called many years Martius DR Dr Rad 4:34 Yes, I also have that name. And let me tell you that you’d have to do a 441 was almost boringly peaceful. 440 is going to turn all that around drama DG Dr G 4:45 bring on the drama I will bring on we also have a price vectors unknown a. DR Dr Rad 4:51 Oh, okay. Apparently. DG Dr G 4:54 I don’t know. This is what Bratton tells me. And this might go on for a couple of years. Hold that thought. Lucia. Manoukian Esquel minus DR Dr Rad 5:04 or greenness. Now that’s an AMA. Do you recall? DG Dr G 5:06 He used to be the console? Suffolk or 458? DR Dr Rad 5:11 Which is where I remember? Yeah, yes. Yeah. That DG Dr G 5:13 year stands out. Yeah, like a shining diamond. DR Dr Rad 5:18 Absolutely. All right. So I can tell you right now that you have to be prepared for a year of many people dying. Oh, not so danger, sedition, famine, and the threat of a king. Oh, yeah. DG Dr G 5:38 I think you and I are talking about different years DR Dr Rad 5:40 I? Yeah, basically, the only bad thing that didn’t happen in this year, according to levy was a foreign war. DG Dr G 5:49 Wow. Okay. So as far as I can tell from the sort of the fragmentary sources that I’ve read, yeah, the events are 440. And the events of 439 are probably going to mesh together in a perhaps a, a, a way that we can’t disentangle DR Dr Rad 6:05 makes your tongue annalistic sauce here. DG Dr G 6:10 And I is missing and everything that I know about the things you’re seeing right now come in the next year. Now, DR Dr Rad 6:15 I think we’ve spoken before about the fact that it seems as though our sources often like to characterise yours in certain ways, which means that sometimes they might be, you know, tidying things up a bit, because they’re like, wouldn’t be just neater, if everything happened in 440, rather than, you know, trickling into January and February of the next year. DG Dr G 6:36 And we’ve also got that issue with like, how do we date things precisely anyway, like, we know that the Fasty records that these analysts historians are going to much later, are fragmentary themselves? At least they are for us. Yeah. I think that they might have been for them as well, because we do get these discrepancies that have emerged along the way. DR Dr Rad 6:54 Yeah. So are you prepared to delve into this year with me? DG Dr G 6:57 I’m ready. I’m really keen to hear what you’ve got to tell me. Okay. DR Dr Rad 7:00 So if a foreign war had been added to the disasters that happened in this year LIVVIE thinks that it would have been a complete disaster for the Romans, even if the gods had been on their sides. That’s telling you something, even if the gods are rooting for you and on your side, and yet somehow you still fail. Must be pretty bad. DG Dr G 7:23 But that’s but he says, That’s not what happened. DR Dr Rad 7:25 No, it isn’t. I’m just trying to paint a picture of how terrible it is. Now, it all begins with a hearable family, and can’t really be 100% Sure, why the feminine came about in the first place? There are a couple of theories there. First of all, weather climate, you know, those things need to be taken care of people otherwise, food shortages do arise. You could also DG Dr G 7:52 have a problematic thing that happens with the crop, some sort of disease moves through it. These things are easier to manage in the modern world with our modern technology. Yeah, not easy to manage in the ancient world. If a devastating sort of plague rips through the crop, right before harvest, you got bad times ahead. DR Dr Rad 8:09 You do but I wish you wouldn’t embellish living this way. DG Dr G 8:14 Just speaking about reasonable hypotheses about the DR Dr Rad 8:16 season it’s the season DG Dr G 8:20 it’s the gods I tell you DR Dr Rad 8:22 Yeah, any here so could just be a weather thing that just didn’t help the crops grow and you know, abundance was needed. However, it could also be that people were neglecting their farming duties. DG Dr G 8:36 Oh, yeah. Okay, this is a patrician read put it back onto the plebeians. Yeah, not doing their job properly DR Dr Rad 8:43 been hanging out and assemblies yet and political city life far too attractive. Not enough time on founder today. DG Dr G 8:51 I thought I’d brush off my socks and become a military tribute with clothes jeweller power, DR Dr Rad 8:57 dear appreciate. I have been now for several weeks in the capital of our great nation. And I cannot put into words how truly magnificent really DG Dr G 9:09 is I’ve decided to go into politics. DR Dr Rad 9:13 Yes, sir. So of course the patricians are indeed upset with this situation because it’s plebeian laziness. That has brought this all around. However, the plans aren’t just going to take this kind of criticism lying down. The tribune of the plebs comes in and accuses the consoles of dishonesty and carelessness. Yeah, so counter accusation. Once again, you guys have been sleeping on the top job. Either way, I think it’s safe to say that both groups are pointing the finger at the other as to why this whole situation nobody DG Dr G 9:49 is harvesting the grain. Once again, crops are being ignored while people argue. DR Dr Rad 9:56 But the tribune of the plebs did eventually manage to get one A Lucia Manoukian is appointed as prefect of the corn supply and the Senate and against this because, hey, everybody’s going to eat. DG Dr G 10:12 I think it’s a sign of the times that something has gone terribly wrong that they need a prefect, just to look after the grain supply. There’s issues here and they’re like, We need a tailored solution. And we need somebody in charge of coming up with that solution. DR Dr Rad 10:25 Yeah, so I hereby de Lucia smooth kiss the nacho King. Now, it turns out, he actually wasn’t fantastic at his job. DG Dr G 10:37 I was gonna say he does practically nothing. DR Dr Rad 10:39 Well, okay, in terms of getting sued. Sure. But he does contribute something else, which is more important. Dr. Jain? He safeguards liberty. Yeah, I’m gonna get to that in a sec. Now, just a little note here, way back in the early republic, and around sort of 494 89 This guy’s relatives were also consult when there was a famine. DG Dr G 11:06 Oh, that’s an unfortunate family tradition. DR Dr Rad 11:10 Yeah. So I’m just going to throw it out there that there is actually a bit of a family connection here. Wow. Yeah. DG Dr G 11:16 That was great. Well, no, I think they actually solved the family. Yeah, I DR Dr Rad 11:20 think they actually did a reasonable job. DG Dr G 11:22 And this might explain why they’ve chosen Manoukian, then, potentially, and DR Dr Rad 11:25 he’s also had, you know, he’s relatives have been fairly well known. You know, they’ve established themselves I mean, not always in great ways. One of them had to be bailed out by Coriolanus. But oops, yeah. Anyway, doesn’t matter. Seven of us, of course, does the logical thing, and that he starts sending out bad signals, you know, help them come to our aid shapes, DG Dr G 11:45 like sheaves of wheat. That’s right. Series ate us. DR Dr Rad 11:50 across land, and across the seas. He asks for aid. He managed to get a little bit of corn from a Tria, but a little bit isn’t going to solve a crisis on this scale. DG Dr G 12:02 Aster is when we talk about corn. We’re not talking about maize at this point in time. No, we’re talking about all sorts of ancient grains, and they’re all sort of classified under this idea of corn in the Roman mind. Yeah, DR Dr Rad 12:13 no joking. It’s very misleading. I apologise, but I just like it. Anyway, so I’m gonna do case decides, well, this isn’t working. So I’m going to take a number of other steps. First of all, I’m going to force all Romans to declare what Roman Roman meant to declare how much core and that they had. DG Dr G 12:32 Tell me how much grain you got in there, buddy. What are you shaking, shaking? DR Dr Rad 12:38 It sounds like there’s more grain within that storage over there. Oh, really? Your spell check is? I think so. DG Dr G 12:43 Don’t look at the barrel…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Episode – Ancient Athenian Women with Associate Professor Rebecca Futo Kennedy Jun 30, 2022
    Show notes

    We sat down recently with Associate Professor Rebecca Futo Kennedy to talk all about Ancient Greek women, specifically in relation to Athens. Futo Kennedy teaches in Classical Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies, and Environmental Studies at Denison University. Kennedy holds a BA in Classical Studies, an MA in Greek and Latin, and completed her PhD on the representation of Athena in the tragedies of Aeschylus and Sophocles at Ohio State University. Kennedy’s most recent monograph is entitled Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City. Special Episode – Ancient Greek Women with Rebecca Futo Kennedy In this conversation we explore the terminology and semantic fields of meaning connected with women in Ancient Greece including some of the persistent misconceptions and assumptions that come along with language. For example, the word hetaira is quite well-known, but what did the ancient Greeks really mean when they used the term? How did women fit into the social structures and hierarchies of the ancient Greek city of Athens? What were women’s lives like and what does the remaining evidence suggest about how they lived and the meaning they saw in their own experiences? We also delve into the complexities attendant upon understanding metics – foreigners in Athens and what this category meant when you were also a woman. And the conversation rounds out with a consideration of poverty in ancient Athens and the challenges in studying this subject. Some Sources A number of sources and scholars are mentioned in this episode. Here’s a few that come up: Jean-Leon Gerome Greek Interior 1848 Brown, Peter 1989. The World of Late Antiquity: AD 150-750 Cecchet, Lucia 2015. Poverty in Athenian Public Discourse: From the Eve of the Peloponnesian War to the Rise of Macedonia Meyer, Elizabeth A. 2010. Metics and the Athenian Phialai-inscriptions: A Study in Athenian Epigraphy and Law Osborne, Robin 1997. ‘Law, the Democratic Citizen and the Representation of Women in Classical Athens’ Past and Present 155, pp 3-33 Pomeroy, Sarah B. 1995. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity – pretty readable, we recommend it if you’re looking for a way to dip further into this subject. Taylor, Claire 2017. Poverty, Wealth, and Well-Being: Experiencing Penia in Democratic Athens Woman playing kottabos. Painting attributed to the Bryn Mawr Painter, c. 480 BCE Sound Credits Thanks to the thrilling Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music. Transcript We’re playing around with auto-generated transcripts. This one was generated by Otter AI. Dr Rad 0:16Welcome to the Partial Historians, Dr G 0:20we explore all the details of ancient Rome. Dr Rad 0:23Everything from the political scandals, the love of ours, that battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I’m Dr. Rad. Dr G 0:34And I’m Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman Sword by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories. Dr Rad 0:43Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city. Dr G 0:57Thank you so much for joining us. Dr. Rad and I are super thrilled to welcome Associate Professor Rebecca Futo Kennedy to the show. Professor Rebecca Futo Kennedy teaches in Classical Studies, women and gender studies and environmental studies at Denison University. Kennedy holds a BA in Classical Studies, and MA in Greek and Latin and completed her PhD on the representation of Athena in the trailer tragedies of Aeschylus and Sophocles at Ohio State University. Kennedy’s most recent monograph is entitled immigrant women in Athens, gender, ethnicity, and citizenship in the classical city. And it’s the subject of Athenian women and non Athenian women, that will be the subject of the conversation that we have today. So thank you so much for joining us, Rebecca. Professor Futo Kennedy 1:52Thank you for having me on. I really appreciate it. And I appreciate the the logistics of scheduling with such vast timezone differences. Yeah, I was looking at it today, it’s like a 14 hour time difference. So it’s somewhat of a miracle that we mathematically were able to work it out at all, to be honest. I know, I know, when we should have scheduled – when I was in Greece. Dr G 2:18To get started on this subject of Athenian women, and also non Athenian women, I want to talk to you about language as a first step, because it’s a really important window on to how we understand society. And this is true as much today as it was in ancient Greece, words carry certain connotations, and they start to reveal certain values to us and sense of community start to emerge from that usage as well. So as a first step, I wanted to ask you about what are some of the terms that are used for women in ancient Greece? How are women socially coded? Professor Futo Kennedy 2:56Yeah, it’s actually a really interesting thing. One of the things I discovered back when I was a graduate student, many, many years ago, is that there is no word for woman default, you have the word octopus, which is the word for either man or human. And you can throw a feminine article in front of it, but it’s actually very rarely done. We see it in medical texts, when you’re really just talking about a body, right? Or the female. Like there’s a word for female, but that works for humans and Non Humans, like. So the fact that you don’t really have a general word, to just say woman is, is, of course, a quite interesting thing. So what you actually have are a series of words that basically code them by marital status or relationship to children. So the word parthenos, for example, which we often translate as virgin actually doesn’t mean virgin. It’s an unmarried girl who hasn’t had a child yet. But you can’t actually the problem is you have to think about what the word means versus how you translate it. And there’s always a gap between there because for translations, we always look for it. They all sort of pity, like one word or a short phrase. And this inevitably warps what the word actually means in context, right? So parthenos is for your sort of younger set. These are the girls who would wear their hair down and wear sleeveless tunics, and often short tuna, but it’s really for unmarried girls. And one of the things that, that some scholars have talked about is that you don’t switch over to being a gyne, which is the word that we is they often translated as woman, but it really means life is it’s childbirth, that actually does the transition, not marriage versus not married. Once you once you have a child, that’s your sort of coming of age, and that usually would have occurred in Athens, which is different from other cities sometime around 14 or 15 or 16. That’s sort of the zone for marriage for girls. We would come So there’s that child marriage now. But this is just, it’s just this it was basically, okay, they have had puberty and now it’s like a little bit out. So you’re a parthenos, you know, 13 to 14 year old. And then by the time she sort of gets married and has her first child, then she would switch to being gyne. And then you have widows, which is pretty easy to you have a word for old women, which isn’t necessarily have any, that’s one of the ones that’s really good to grouse. It doesn’t actually have much to do with marriage status or not marriage status, it’s just old. Right, just old people. When you see it in context, it’s often used of formerly enslaved women. So you’ll see it in like the Odyssey of the old nurse of Odysseus, or in tragedy of these older former nannies for more wet nurses, characters, and then you have a series of words that are for people who are outside of the marriage track. And those can be super confusing. So one of them is the word Paula kiss or Paula Kay. There’s actually two spelling of the word. And that word is often translated as concubine. And the reason why it is translated that way is because our dictionaries are made with 19th century. Right? Dr Rad 6:23Right, yeah. And there’s Victorians. Yeah, so Professor Futo Kennedy 6:26they refer to them, because it appears in Herodotus in the context of in one particular context of the Persian harem. And so it gets coded as concubine. But then you see it in lots of different Greek contexts and Roman Greek contexts. So we have some Roman era inscriptions, in which the word appears, that are actually probably temple attendance. Because it’s a it’s a generational inscription at a temple, saying, you know, thanking the Goddess. And definitely Boudin has argued, based on the context for this, that these can’t have been generations of concubines, in the same family or us, sometimes scholars will just say, oh, it just means prostitute. Like everything is code for prostitute if it’s not wife. And so and so, it seems to actually be an attendant or a companion to the Goddess, right, as you will. And then you see it in Athenian context, where you’ll see it in tragedy to refer to and drama key. And so this idea that she’s the concubine of Achilles, son, me autonomous in the play. But and then you see is founded on a tombstone, which is super rare. And I think what it has to be that because there’s only a couple of words that go, if you’re missing letters, we’re missing some major. So apparently, when a tomb was first study, published in the 1920s, there were more letters there. But it’s in the Piraeus museum. And who knows, you know, during World War Two, they hid all the objects and tried to like hide all the different strap all the objects down when the Nazis were marching. And so I’m sure damage occurred to some of the objects but there’s a big hole where there used to be a letter. So I’m pretty sure it says politicus, because the only other option is really pull Lacus, which just means often and you wouldn’t put that on your tombstone, to list your status in relationship to a man I am often have a man talking to work. So translation pavlakis, here and also into other contexts in a CDN. Court speeches, suggests that the term also means a contracted relationship. So a not a marriage, like relationships for people who can’t actually contract a marriage. Some scholars have argued that it’s a powerless relationship. But most of the ones that I found are of non citizen women in a relationship, but there was a law in Athens. That goes back apparently to Solon, where this particular type of woman, it was a legally binding contract, and children were considered legitimate. Even if they weren’t citizens, they were still legitimate children. So arguments have been made that these were enslaved women, typically, but they wouldn’t have been able to have legitimate children, with a with their owner with their own flavour, if it was such. So I think there’s that word has like three different meanings. But everybody conflates it to concubine, thanks to our dictionaries. And then of course, probably the most well known and most contentious one is hiera, which everybody translates as core design, which is not necessarily, again, 19th century dictionary. You know, often I asked my students like, Do you know what a concubine is? Do you know two quarters of this? And they’re like, no idea. Dr G 9:45Yeah, like, what’s the fine grain of nuance there for the 19th century that were missing? Professor Futo Kennedy 9:49Yeah, right. And in the shade, it seems to be between those two words in the 19th century is one is a Turkish woman in the Ottoman Empire as foreign and one Is your your sort of grind horizontally your demi-monde girlfriend or something? But that’s the 19th century? Not, you know? Dr G 10:11Yeah. How do we get that into ancient Athens? Really? Dr Rad 10:15Yeah, absolutely. Perhaps you could tell us a little bit about how the definition of hetaira has changed over time. Professor Futo Kennedy 10:23Yeah, it’s a funny one too, because the got coded in the 19th century by our lexicon writers, you know, Liddell and Scott and Jones as courtesans. But in like 1929, Gong wrote an article that was like, there was no like, trained finishing school for like, fine courtesans, ends and assets, like no such thing like, you know, so even in the 1920s, people were like, this is ridiculous. But it got really picked up in the 1980s by feminist scholars in the field, as part of a movement to sort of bring for scholarship of non elite women. And so this whole industry basically developed around studying prostitution in the ancient world. Part of this is part of the modern movement to de stigmatise sex work. But what they ended up doing was taking all these women who are called hetaira, in any context, even being called this thing by people who are attacking them in court, right, and treating it as a status category. First off, and then treating a cortisone as an independent, educated woman, as if they were sort of looking for, you know, someone like these 19th century women, who often were able to live outside of marriages and, and held salons and things you know, in Paris, and in London, I often think of a good example is Elizabeth Armitage, who ended up marrying a former prime minister and we had so many legacies left to her by her former partners that she was able to buy her own house in the countryside and sort of lived out her life, happily married to the man of her dreams, to an aristocrat, you know, etc. So they sort of imagined this grand courtesan, educated, liberated, and they use a spacia as the sort of model for this. Basically, misunderstanding, Athenian law. And the leading Plutarch, who 700 years after she had lived, basically said that she held a she random harem in Paris Leazes house after telling us the territories was so worried about public opinion that he wouldn’t even go to party and drink. Dr G 12:32So if it’s over here, this is fine. Professor Futo Kennedy 12:34Yeah. The harem like, she’s, she’s running, she’s running a brothel out of his living room. Dr Rad 12:40But you don’t have one of these, you gotta get Professor Futo Kennedy 12:42A girl’s gotta get educated. Right, so everybody became a hetaira. And then of course, we had this famous article in the 90s from Leslie Kirk, which is like inventing the hetaira, where she like makes this grand distinction between the courtesan and the hetaira. Oh, porne is another word for women, which she classified as the sort of streetwalker, sort of the really poor, lower class, sex worker versus the hetaira who was the high class. But, you know, you’ve looked at these dictionaries, and these words have like one word listed. The new Cambridge lexicon, actually has a really nice full definition of attire that takes into consideration the last like three decades of four decades of scholarship. So that’s one nice thing that they’ve done in that. But you see that like, The Word Appears in Sappho. And it refers to Artemis and Hera is like, hetairae. So clearly, they’re not courtesans. So it has to mean something else. So what are the things that you see that in earlier texts, a lot of contexts, it probably just means girlfriend, as in your friends who are girls on the equivalent of the word hetairos, which is your buddies that you hang out, listen to requests at parties, and we actually have this whole class of women in the sort of early fifth century, late sixth century and Athens who were like the wives and sisters and daughters of the wealthiest of the wealthy. People like Pisistratus’ daughter Coesyra, people like Elpinice, who was Miltiades, the general’s daughter and the sister of Kimon and she was married to the wealthiest man in Athens. They are not courtesans but they’re we you know, they’re clearly public figures. And we have inscriptions referring to them ostracism inscriptions, like they want their husbands or their brothers or their sons to be kicked out of the city. They’re like, take your mother with you. Take your sister with you. And so there’s all these rumours they have bad reputations like, openly gay supposed…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Episode 126 – How to Win Land and Influence Ardea Jun 16, 2022
    Show notes

    In around 443 BCE Rome is navigating its relationships with its neighbours. Last time we caught up with Rome they became involved in the affairs of the nearby city of Ardea. The conflict seems to have centred around a very attractive plebeian woman whose name has not been recorded in the annals of history. It’s this meddling in Ardea which sets the scene for 442 BCE… Episode 126 – How to Win Land and Influence Ardea The challenges of 442 BCE The consuls of 443 had such a great year that the incoming consuls for 442 BCE knew they had a lot to live up to. There’s a sense that the successes over Ardea were substantial but there are mixed feelings about how this all come about…. The complexity lies in the nature of the history of conflict with Ardea. The Romans sense that they have actually made some mistakes in how they have dealt with Ardea and the Rutilian people. The Rutilians are the people of this region and Ardea is their capital. In order to determine how best to proceed they opt to form the triumviri coloniae deducendae “the group of three men for the commission of the settlement”. Their task to solve the problem of land allotment in relation to Ardea. A colony might just solve their concerns, but what should that colony look like? We explore the details! Ardea, the central settlement of the Rutilians was south of Rome. Rome and 441 BCE It’s a brand new year and it’s time for some games, apparently. There are rumours that the decemvirs had promised the people a set of games, and it now seems to have fallen to the tribune of the plebs, Poetilius to get this event off the ground. Beyond the issue of games at Rome, there’s some interesting rumblings far to the south of Italy in Magna Graecia that might also become important later on. Polychromatic terracotta head of a woman with brown hair and pale skin. From Taranto (Magna Graecia) end of 4th century BCE. Antikenmuseum Basel und Sammlung Ludwig, Inv. Kuhn 35. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Our Players The Consuls 442 BCE Marcus Fabius Q. f. M. n. Vibulanus Postumus Aebutius – f. – n. Helva Cornicen 441 BCE Gaius Furius – f. – n. Pacilus Fusus Manius (or Marcus) Papirius – f. – n. Crassus The triumviri coloniae deducendae Agrippa Menenius (Lanatus) Titus Cloelius Siculus Marcus Aebutius Helva Tribune of the Plebs Poetilius Sources Dr G reads Diodorus Siculus 12.34-5 Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.11-12. Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association) Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis) Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Sound Credits Thanks to BBC Sounds (Beta) for sound effects and the fabulous Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music. Love our work? You can support us on Patreon Wall painting – mistress and three maids – Herculaneum (insula orientalis II – palaestra – room III) – Napoli MAN 9022. While a much later artefact than the period this episode covers, this depiction of women helps reflect the world explored when it comes to women.Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. Automated Transcript Provided by Otter AI Dr Rad 0:01Welcome to a brand new episode of The Partial Historians where we are tracing the journey of Rome and from the founding of this city. I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad. Dr G 0:13And I am Dr. G. And boy, what a time we’re in Roman history. It’s the early republic. People are everywhere. Armies are in places, and the Romans they’re a little bit all over the shop as well. Dr Rad 0:28They are, we are in around 443 BCE at the moment. And to give you a bit of a recap of what happened last episode, well, quite frankly, would not have been out of place on Keeping Up With The Kardashians. Dr. G. Dr G 0:42Well, you know, when you’re a patrician, and you really like a girl, she has to be hot, doesn’t she? Dr Rad 0:48Oh if she’s a plebeian, hell yes. She has to be hot. I mean, what else does she bring into the relationship? Dr G 0:53Ouch. Dr Rad 0:56So we had this whole situation where Rome got involved in a civil conflict that had broken out in the nearby area of DIA. And it was between a patrician group and a probation group. And it is really interesting that even though our day out is seen as being culturally quite different to the Romans. There’s apparently still patricians and plebeians running around… Dr G 1:20Look, I’m not going to lie. I don’t believe Livy I don’t, I don’t think there’s social – Dr Rad 1:25Now you mentioned it. God! Dr G 1:27I don’t think their social structure is necessarily going to resemble that of the Romans at this point in time. We know that they come from a different language group. Dr Rad 1:34Yes. Dr G 1:35They seem pretty independent, and they certainly don’t want Rome involved. What are the chances that their whole society is structured on the same premise as patricians and plebeians, that Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus really want us to believe other is the way that the Romans operated in this very early period of the Republic? Dr Rad 1:53I’ll tell you why. Because Rome is the best and therefore everything they have everyone else wants. Anyway, so Rome ended up getting involved in this conflict over a very hot plebeian girl, which spilled out into civil war. Seems to happen an unnatural amount of times in the ancient world. And that ended up being really good for the Romans, actually. Dr G 2:16It did. Dr Rad 2:17Yeah. Dr G 2:17Yeah. The consul of 443, Geganius, he manages to secure a triumph out of that. Dr Rad 2:23Yup. Dr G 2:23Incredible stuff, really. Dr Rad 2:24It is it is. Dr G 2:25And he has a girl to thank and her name has not been recorded. And frankly, that’s not good enough. Dr Rad 2:29You know what you’re right. And also, back at home, things had been peaceful domestically, with consuls in charge. Yes. And apparently a census. Yes, was the official position of sense or being created because quite frankly, it’s just too much paperwork for the consuls and are interested. They’re not down for it. The Romans are living in exciting time. I know. So that was our quick recap of 443 BCE. Now, Dr. G, I’m going to take you into 442. All right, Dr. J. So I know that you’re going to be very attached to Libby today because Dionysius does not exist. Dr G 3:09Oh, yes. deines is a holocaust. This is sadly missing for 442 BC. But I’m happy to give you what little I have been able to throw together by the way of other material Dr Rad 3:20that I really appreciate yet. Dr G 3:24So I start with Bratton, yes, he and his co author created an E two volume, which then became a three volume set of magistrates of the Republic. And this is a great text, really, I mean, such good work and anyway, we have the consuls. Marcus Fabius, son of Quintus son, grandson of Marcus, Vibulanus, a patrician Dr Rad 3:52Of course. He’s a Fabian, Dr G 3:54and then post rumours, a beauteous father unknown grandfather unknown over corny can Dr Rad 4:02That’s an unusual last couple of names. Dr G 4:05It is. Yeah, the whole thing is a little bit unusual. And booty is how via corny can is also a patrician. But corny can just makes me think of corns and I’m sorry, but I don’t really want my political leaders to have skin conditions like that. Dr Rad 4:22Well, okay. So this pair is also the pair that is in living, and they know that they’re coming into a difficult position because the year before with Ganey is getting a tryout for so good. Yeah. Really good. And quick, just capital owners. I mean, to be honest, it doesn’t seem like he actually does a lot. But everybody just loves him to pieces by this stage. Because he’s older. He’s been around the block a few times. They all know who he is. So they’re following a class Dr G 4:52act. Yeah. And he’s one of those silver fox consuls. Yeah. Dr Rad 4:56And they know that this therefore means that they’ve got a lot to To try and live up to because 443 had been a pretty goddamn good year as far as everyone was concerned in Rome. And also because not just how the consuls have personally conducted themselves, but the shame of that decision that had been made to steal the US territory when most vulnerable, we’re just going to take it. Yeah, that stain has somewhat been lifted by the fact that the Romans had managed to successfully help them out with their civil war. Dr G 5:30I’m interested that Rome felt a sense of shame. I mean, it seems so unusual and out of keeping with how Rome conducts itself in the future. But we’ll leave that for now. It’s interesting that once once upon a time, a bit like Darth Vader once had a soul. Dr Rad 5:45Well, you know, look, if I’m being very cynical, Dr. G, which, you know, is someone like me. I feel like this really is part of the class conflict story, because the people made that decision. When dad came to room with this border dispute issue. Seems like years ago now. It had been the people that had made that decision. Yeah, the wetlands should be out. Yeah, the patricians slash senators who are however you want to designate them. They’ve never been on board. With doing that they thought it was dishonourable, because it wasn’t what they were asked. They were asked to settle a border dispute, not hey, do you want this land? Dr G 6:27But what if those borders were Roman? Dr Rad 6:30Well, exactly. And so I feel like this is just a constant dig at how the people don’t make good political decisions. Dr G 6:40Yes. And I think this is part of the way that we can tell that we’re in a very rhetorical presentation of history. Yes. And this is something that historians are always aware of is that and maybe Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Livi, are aware of this to a certain extent, as well. But historians are constructing a narrative. Yeah, from the available evidence. There are some things which might be considered facts. But not everything is effect. Yeah. And sometimes facts are only relevant to the extent to which they help you understand what might be going on somewhere. And you have to pick and choose, there are always too many things happening, or conversely, as a historian, not enough records. Yeah, to be sure. So you’ve either got too much information, and you have to decide what you leave out. Well, you don’t have enough information. And you’ve got to try and fill in the gaps. And live in dinosaurs of how it can ask us I’m very much trying to fill in gaps, Dr Rad 7:35massively. I mean, earlier and public, I don’t know what they use. I mean, I do, but I don’t think there’s sources would have been very detailed. Dr G 7:42The trouble is that they’re using the fastI. So they’re using controller lists, which is fine and dandy. And it’s something that has existed that the Romans have looked after. And they’re like, these are our lists. And the Romans love lists. We’ve seen this before. Hello, censorship. But they’re also relying on some really early historiography that has been written by others, which unfortunately for us now no longer survives. Yeah, as far as we’re aware, unless somebody turns up an amazing treasure. We still hold out hope always Unknown Speaker 8:14find it. Very interesting. Dr G 8:18So we’ve got Aeneas as an early source Fabius picked or as an earlier source, leukemias, Mesa who came up a couple of episodes ago is an important source as well for these guys. So we do know that there are other writers who have written histories previous to live in Dionysius, but how much they’ve got to add and where they’re getting their material from? It’s also open question. Dr Rad 8:40Absolutely. So essentially, these new consuls, no, they want to make an impression. They don’t want to be overshadowed by this dynamic duo. This, you know, bad boys, a lot of them are really bad boys. Too good. To be honest. They don’t want to be overshadowed by this Dr G 8:56Batman and Robin, these two who did everything right in their consulship. Absolutely. Dr Rad 9:01So they decide, look, we’ve somewhat atoned for what happened with our data? A couple of years ago, however, let’s push that further. Oh, I have some details. Okay. All right. So the idea of pushing it further, obviously would be that this would truly force everyone to forget that Rome ever made a bad decision. Dr G 9:22We can wipe the slate clean and begin again. Yeah, I’m assuming correct me if I’m wrong, that you’re referring to the trim weary colon a colon nine, a De qu Dindi. Dr Rad 9:37Like I wasn’t gonna put it like that. Yes, that is what I’m talking about. Dr G 9:41This is the group of three men brought together basically for the commission of the settlement. So trying to figure out the land in respect to our day are you once and for Dr Rad 9:55all? Absolutely. So they forced through a decree that as The population of our day had been completely decimated by what had just happened that bizarre private conflict that started a civil war over a marriage, that Rome would therefore be setting up a colony in our data. Oh, Dr G 10:16yeah, I don’t think this solves their shame issue at all. Dr Rad 10:20Wait, but wait, there is a very clever aspect to this. So obviously, they’re going to need people to enrol in the colony, because they don’t want our data to fall prey to the moleskin. So as we highlighted in the previous episode, very close to our data, and an enemy of Rome. So they don’t want that happening. And our data used to be on good terms with room they want to maintain that all that sort of thing. So they set up the decree in this very particular way. So that it seems as though what they’re doing is introducing something new, rather than overturning a decision made by the people, and assisted by the tribune of the plebs, I suppose, like, they don’t want to be seen that they’re going back on the decision of the people. Okay. But the senators privately get together. And that’s never a good sign. But actually, in this case, it is they are actually for once doing something good, it’s kind of shocking. So they decided that they’re going to enrol as many colonists as they possibly can. Who are people from this culture, like from the culture associated with idea are going to be the colonists? Okay, Dr G 11:32Romans, they’re going to give a dance back their land, in creating in our day and colony, yeah, populated by our dance. Dr Rad 11:42Yeah, so the only land that will be distributed to colonists will be the land that the Romans took, in this bad judgement, this border land area. So that’s the land that they’re splitting up amongst colonists. And they are not going to give any Roman person any of this land until all the they call them reptilians in this sense, but that that’s just referring to the people from this culture ideas, the capital for these particular people. Those are the people who are going to be prioritised. So it’s a very sneaky way of essentially handing the land back to the people of idea. Dr G 12:21So does this mean that our day from this point onwards is going to be technically classified as a Roman colony? Whilst being mostly populated by its native people? Yes. In her restaurant it is. Dr Rad 12:34And this is when those triangles that you were talking about the three men of course, right is they are appointed to help set up this colony. Yeah, and I have some names, but I suspect that this might be something that you also have. Dr G 12:49Well, I mean, that would be ideal, I suppose. Dr Rad 12:53Okay, so they are Agrippa Menenius, Titus Cloelius Siculus, Marcus Aebutius Helva. Dr G 13:02Hmm. Aebutius Helva sounds a little bit familiar. Dr Rad 13:07A lot of those names, I think sounds really like Menenius. Again, is, you know, is a name that we have heard before. So these are all people whose names we’ve we’ve heard before. And they’re going to be in a difficult situation, because they h…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Episode – Roman Republican Coinage with Professor Liv Yarrow May 26, 2022
    Show notes

    We were absolutely delighted to sit down recently with Professor Liv Yarrow to talk all about ancient Roman coinage from the republican period. Special Episode – Roman Republican Coinage with Professor Liv Yarrow Liv Yarrow is a professor at the City University of New York (CUNY). She holds a BA from the George Washington University and an MPhil and DPhil from the University of Oxford. Her scholarship spans the areas of ancient historiography and numismatics. In 2006 she published Historiography at the End of the Republic: Provincial Perspectives on Roman Rule(Oxford 2006) and in 2020 her book The Republic to 49 BCE: Using Coins as Sources came out with Cambridge University Press. She is also a co-director of the Roman Republican Die Project with the American Numismatic Society. What’s Coming up with Roman Coins! In this conversation we explore a range of topics, including: how to approach the study of coins (numismatics) – it is a very specialised field! how the questions we ask of evidence changes affects our inferences and ideas what makes a coin particularly beautiful how coins can help us understand society, architecture, politics, and iconography some of the amazing fashion you might spot on coins! Coins to Keep in Mind! Yarrow weaves a number of coin issues into the conversation, here’s some examples that we discuss: Denarius of Sulla. ANS 1944.100.1502. Obverse: L·MANLI [PRO]·Q – Helmeted head of Roma right. Border of dots. Reverse: L·SVLLA·IM – Triumphator, crowned by flying Victory, in quadriga right, holding reins in left hand and caduceus in right hand. Border of dots. Silver tetradrachm of Mithradates VI, Pontus, 120 BC – 63 BCE. 1944.100.41480. Obverse: head of Mithradates VI. Reverse: stag feeding Silver Coin, Rome, 55 BCE 1944.100.2636 ANS 1944.100.2636. RRC 428/3. Obverse: Head of Genius Populi Romani right, with sceptre over shoulder. Border of dots. Reverse: Q·CASSIVS – Eagle on thunderbolt right; on left, lituus; on right, jug . Border of dots. Just one example of a wild haired deity on Roman coinage, echoing Mithridates’ aesthetic! Silver Coin, Rome, 97 BCE 1937.158.59. Obverse: L·POMPON·MOLO – Laureate head of Apollo right; around, inscription. Border of dots. Reverse: NVMA·POMPIL – Lighted altar; to left, Numa Pompilius holding lituus; to right, youth (victimarius) leading goat. Border of dots. Numa sacrificing with his head unveiled in the Greek fashion. Silver Coin, Rome, 64 B.C. 1944.100.2352. Obverse: L·ROSCI – Head of Juno Sospita right; behind, control mark . Border of dots. Reverse: FABATI – Girl and snake facing each other; on left, control mark. Border of dots. Bibliothèque nationale de France, REP-17578. RRC 379/1. Juno Sospita on reverse – note the pointy shoes! Sound Credits Thanks to the thrilling Bettina Joy de Guzman for our theme music. Transcript We’re exploring automated transcripts for our episodes. This one was produced by Otter AI: Dr Rad 0:16Welcome to the Partial Historians, we explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything from the political scandals, the love of ours, that battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I’m Dr. Rad and I’m Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different authors from the ancient past and comparing their stories. Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city. Welcome, everybody to a very special episode of the Partial Historians. We are fabulously excited today to be sitting down with Professor Liv Yarrow from CUNY, the City University of New York, who has classics background at Brooklyn College and classics in history at the graduate centre. She holds a BA from George Washington University and an MPhil and D. Phil from the University of Oxford. So her scholarship spans the areas of ancient historiography and numismatics. In 2006, she published historiography at the end of the Republic, provincial perspectives on Roman rule with Oxford, and in 2020, her book, The Republic 249 BCE, using coins as sources came out with the Cambridge University Press. She is also the co director of the Roman republican dye project with the American numismatic society. So this is a huge honour, we’re super excited, because this means that we’re going to be learning more about Roman coins and coinage and concepts to do with numismatics in the ancient Roman world. And I’m just really thrilled to have you here. Thank you so much for joining us. Professor Yarrow 2:17Thanks a lot. I’m really excited about this. I hope it inspires everyone to go look at some actual coins, not just listen to our fun words. Dr Rad 2:28I think it will for sure because I mean, as much as we will talk about specific coins, I’m sure in the process of this conversation, we’ll definitely need to have that visual with us in order to like really appreciate what’s going on with coinage. There’s such a fascinating type of evidence, Professor Yarrow 2:45we’ll get to curate a little gallery for everybody. It’ll be fun. Dr Rad 2:49Exciting. All right, so let’s jump in. So in your latest book, The Republic 249 BCE, using coins as sources, it’s designed to help guide students and scholars on the approach to the study of coinage. To get us started what is a sort of foundational idea for people who are interested in ancient coinage if they’re looking to sort of develop their expertise in this area. Professor Yarrow 3:15So the first thing to appreciate about ancient coinage is that it is one of the only visual mass produced media from antiquity. By which I mean that a team of men, maybe three men, working at a single workstation could produce anywhere from 10 to 40,000 coins with all with the same exact image in one day. And we think issue sizes and the Roman Republic that means coins where they might be using slightly different dyes. But the intention in the pre modern era is that they all look pretty much identical might be in the terms of millions of coins. And that’s a type of dissemination of visual imagery that we just don’t have with any other media In antiquity or really until we get to the printing press. Dr Rad 4:19Absolutely. So in the introduction to your book, you noted that different types of scholars will approach interpreting coins differently. So for example, and archaeologists will come with different questions from a socio political historian. How might this difference look in practice? Professor Yarrow 4:36Sure, so archaeologists love coins because they are more confident about the dating of those coins and they rely on us numismatist provide a handy dandy list of what date that coin was made at. And our catalogues are really confident about this coin was is made and this year, and we’re really good at dating coins. But in the Roman Republic being really good at dating coins means with a five year plus or minus error. So one of the things that we need to be really aware of is that not every date ascribed to every coin is as rock solid as we might want. So that in archaeology using a coin to date, a layer of stratigraphy is a very common approach. Another way that associate political person might look at is can I look at the person who made this coin? And can I connect this coin to the textual narrative that I receive? An art historian might look at a coin and say, Is this image representative of a statue group? And was that statue group well known? And what did it mean in the public display? And why is there that connection between the image on the coin and a famous or semi famous public image. Dr Rad 6:15So this sounds like it’s sort of coins have so much sort of condensed information that they might provide to somebody who’s interested in the ancient past, regardless of what perspective, they’re coming from it. And when we’re thinking about ancient Rome, we actually understand that coinage emerges relatively late in their society. So you talk about it coming, coming out in sort of the late fourth century BCE, and this is late compared to other Mediterranean societies. So I’m really interested in what sort of factors might have influenced Rome, one to adopt coinage, but also why they might have been so late to adopt coinage comparatively speaking. Professor Yarrow 6:55So as in so many ways, the ancient Romans were at a crossroads and a cultural crossroads, and a very literal crossroads. In terms of the peninsular Italy. They connected the cultures of the coastal areas, the sea, travelling communities and the interior. There, the Tiber was a very important point of connection. And then also, to cross the Tiber, the situation of the city of Rome, we always need to remember is where it was easiest to get across this major river. So the river is at once a conduit for travel, but also a barrier that needs to be overcome. And so the Romans are this cross cultural community from very early on. And this is especially true in terms of money. So to back up a little bit. Money is the first human invention, you might think that without coins, or some other tangible form of money, that everything is about barter. But in fact, the first invention is the intellectual exercise of realising that if you have a shared unit of exchange, or store of value, or measure of a measure of value store of wealth, that you can make transactions between individuals easier because you have a shared system of understanding, wealth and value and exchange. And that doesn’t depend on a physical object or a piece of money, even if it’s expressed that way. So shackles exist before we have a physical thing that we call a shackle. And so, Roman Italy, and Italy and wider. Indigenous Italy was fully monetized before the coming of coinage and their monetary system is based on measures of value tied to the Roman pound, and particularly to bronze and to not just the Roman pound the Roman pound in Rome, but the pound in any other community with their own systems of weights and measures. And there’s some really exciting work being done on this idea of how different systems of information and information knowledge like standardisation of weights and measures reflect social change. And so I just nod towards like the work of Andrew Rigsby on this sort of thing that’s very influential to destabilise what we think we know that the pound isn’t so fixed as we might want it to be in a modern world when we go back into antiquity these things are a little bit more flexible and changeable both in terms of space and time. But coming back to my thread of money and the switch from money to coinage, the money and the physical money of Peninsular Italy among indigenous communities was primarily what we now call a scholars eyes rude, which just means crude bronze or eyes for mahtim. And that’s again a made up Latin phrase just meeting, bronze that has been moulded into a shape. But the shape isn’t standardised. So the Romans were already participating in an indigenous is monetary system. But they were highly aware of their Greek neighbours who were colonists primarily in the south and primarily on the coast. And travelling and meeting other Greeks through those coastal communities, that they had a monetary tradition that derives from this, the tradition of coinage that started in the kingdom of Lydia, and that’s in southern modern day Turkey. And that started about the seventh century BC and that’s the monetary tradition that we still participate of coinage today. Just for full perspective, we have to remember that coinage was also invented by the Chinese in about the same century. And when these two traditions of coinage meet on the central steps, they recognise each other. And we have Chinese texts from the Han Dynasty, talking about how funny the coins are from the Mediterranean, because they have faces on them, and they use these precious metals. And that’s so weird, because that’s not what our money the Chinese money looks like. But they’re parallel inventions to solve a common problem. Coins are just a really easy way to solve the tangibility of money and to turn the invention of money into something that’s easily and readily used by everyone in the community. So that Romans at this crossroads, are participating into monetary systems. And they’re participating at first simultaneously. So the first coin that has the name Rome on it is made in ancient Minneapolis, what we call Naples, and we date that to 326 BCE. And we date it to the moment at which Rome enters into a treaty with Naples, after Naples has sided with their other enemies of the moment in southern Italy. But Naples is also one of these cross cultural communities of central but coastal Italy. And it’s not surprising, because Naples is already making coins for many of its neighbours. It’s a service that provides that one of the things they might offer to the Romans at this first moment moment of coming into a legal established relationship is to make them some coins. And those first coins look just like bronzes of Naples, they have the head of Apollo, they have the man faced bull. And we are pretty confident that we can link the coin that says, of the Romans and Greek to the moment of the treaty, because we have a pretty decent seriation of the Naples series. And we can sort of slot in stylistically that that it confirms the logic based on the texts that these coins share all of these habits. And so, in that first instance, the Romans are conceding and not in a particularly financially useful way that earliest Roman struck coins are made by Greek communities for the Romans in the name of the Romans, but they’re not made in such large quantities that they would have been of particular use. The Romans themselves at Rome, itself really seem to dive into the making of physical money in the run up to the First Punic War. And that’s where we get a kind of coin that has a another made up Latin phrase name, which is ice scrub, which just means heavy bronze, the heavy bronze. And, and a scholar named Burnett has this hypothesis that I think is very convincing that what I scrub represents is a combination of the sensibilities of the southern Italian Greek tradition of using coins, that a coin should have a face on one side and a design on the other, and it should be round. And it should have a fixed weight with a fixed denomination. So all of these features that are common within the Greek monetary tradition, coinage tradition, and the traditions of Central Italy, that money should be substantial and should be a bronze. And that it should have this weight. And so it seems that in this first, their first making of this mixed cultural tradition of money, they’re trying to keep what’s culturally important about both traditions. Dr Rad 16:26As they look, I think that’s so fascinating, because one of the things that I often talk about with my students, both ancient and modern history is how money is essentially a human invention. And that’s particularly funny in Australia, because I don’t know if you’re aware, but our money essentially looks like Monopoly money when we’re talking about our notes. So I’m like, You do realise that this is just plastic. And the only reason why it has a value is because we say it has. Professor Yarrow 16:53You know, but in some ways, it’s getting easier to teach that particularly with touchless payments, and the popularity of touchless payments, even growing in the backwards Land of the United States, in the course of the pandemic, to reduce our physical money, or our swiping of cards or the use of tap, because it helps us all understand the degree to which we say $1 or a pound, or any other monetary unit, but we’re really just measuring some abstract concept of value. And it can be nice to have something physical to, to hold, we all like getting, you know, a couple bills in our in our birthday card, maybe from grandma, if we still get that, but we’re quickly going to add that to our very untenable pot of credit with a with a bank. Dr Rad 17:57Absolutely. So you talked about the d…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 9 10 11 12 13 23 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History

    1

    Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History History
    More Perfect

    2

    More Perfect Government
    Casefile True Crime

    3

    Casefile True Crime Games & Hobbies
    The Way I Heard It with Mike Rowe

    4

    The Way I Heard It with Mike Rowe History
    BackStory

    5

    BackStory History
    The Black Dahlia Serial Killers

    6

    The Black Dahlia Serial Killers History
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights