TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Climate Change and Happiness

    We give language to what you feel about the climate crisis—and also what you might want to feel, feelings you can grow and cultivate. This supports your resilience and your mental health and wellbeing. We invite other experts to join us in our conversations, and we hope you can join us too.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Season 3, Episode 5: The Climate Emotions Wheel Oct 27, 2023
    Show notes

    Climate Emotions Wheel © 2023 by Anya Kamenetz, Panu Pikhala, Sarah Newman, Megan Slade, JulieSouza, Ryleigh Corrigan is licensed under CC BY-SA4.0 | Resource at ClimateMentalHealth.Net. Based on research by Panu Pihkala at the University of Helsinki and particularly his 2022 paper:“Toward a Taxonomy of Climate Emotions“ | Featured in NYC Times Square Hope Hydration Hydrostation. Season 3, Episode 5: The Climate Emotions WheelThomas interviewed Panu about his recent climate emotions research and the Climate Emotions Wheel created by the Climate Mental Health Network based on Panu’s work. LinksClimate Emotions WheelClimate and Mental Health NetworkPanu Pihkala 2022 Toward a Taxonomy of Climate EmotionsGen Dread: Climate emotions aren’t all “negative”TranscriptTranscript edited for clarity and brevity. Thomas Doherty: Please support the climate change and happiness podcast. See the donate page at climatechangeandhappiness.com.[music: “CC&H theme music”]Doherty: Hi, this is Thomas Doherty … Panu Pihkala: And I am Panu Pihkala. Doherty: And welcome to Climate Change and Happiness. This is our podcast. Panu and I have been working on this podcast for a couple of years now. It came from our own personal dialogues, and we thought we'd open this up and share this with the public and with our, you know, bringing in our colleagues. This is a podcast for people around the globe who are thinking, and most importantly, feeling a lot of interesting, deep things about climate change and other environmental issues. And so in this particular podcast, we talk about the emotional aspects. Panu has been doing a lot of research and writing on this. I'm working with people on this and also doing my own writing and work. And so this is a place for the emotions, all emotions all the time. The emotions are in our bodies, they're physiological, we can measure those, the feelings, of course, are infinite, because it's our language and our words and all around the world are all kinds of different feelings words we use to describe our emotions. So, Panu, speaking of emotions, I know you've been working on this for years now, recently, someone adapted some of your work into an emotions wheel. A Wheel of different kinds of emotions that think about in terms of climate change. And I thought we would touch in on that, see what you see what you think about that, and how that how that flows out of your work. And we'll go from there.Pihkala: Yes, thanks, Thomas. This climate emotion wheel has now been shared pretty heavily in social media. And the visualization and the selection of the words was made by the organization, the Climate and Mental Health Network. And they asked me to comment on the project also. So, I did some of some of that. And there's been interesting developments. For example, it's been on a Times Square advertisement in New York for him for a while. And so it really seems to resonate with many, many people. And myself, when I started to dig deeper into emotion studies, I remember that visualizations were very helpful—in addition to all this text that we have about emotions. Robert Plutchik has this famous emotions wheel and there are several versions available online. And as you Thomas well know, emotion researchers have debates between them as all researchers do. So there's no standard emotion wheel that would be accepted by everyone, I really think that these are practically useful. But of course, they also have their limits. And there are always simplifying things. So there's pros and cons in using this. But I'm very happy that my work has been useful in the creation of this wheel.Doherty: Yes! You can go on Amazon and find a climate emotions wheel pillow and a climate emotions wheel … therapists use these in their work. And there's posters. And any mental health person will be familiar with this stuff. It's helpful to have some sort of guide to all different kinds of emotions. So there's two things that we're talking about in this podcast for people in the know. For researchers, there's all the backstory of how people empirically study this. And it's quite interesting. And then there's just our own need of it. Because we cannot be alive without having emotions, all living things have some sort of emotional response to the environment. And then of course, as humans, we have these nuanced, potentially nuanced feelings. So it's nice to have, like anything else, a guide, a taxonomy, as you say, a list of words. And the wheel is just putting that into a graphic form. And so I think it's helpful. Do you think, you know, as someone who gets deep into this. Obviously, I believe you think it's helpful for people to look at these kinds of wheels and I'm so impressed that it's in Times Square, I didn't know that. I think that's great. Is there any downsides of putting this onto a wheel? Pihkala: Well, there's all always potential dangers. And also in relation to the old emotion wheels, people have been wary of the possibility that folks would think that the emotions in the middle somehow are really the most important and primary ones. That's a big debate in emotion research, whether there are sort of basic emotions or universal emotions shared by people worldwide. [Yeah.] So that's one possible misconception is that, you know, these four, emotional words in the middle, that they would be the only real overall candidate categories. But then then again, that is not what know what the wheel and the people are saying. So, the makers of the climate emotion wheel, they didn't intend that this would have all the relevant emotion words, they just wanted to provide many useful emotion words, so that people can think about what they may be feeling and what others may be feeling. So this may be validating both for people themselves and in relation to others. And we know from science, that if we have names for emotions, even roughly pointing to the right direction, then it's easier for us to engage with that, with those emotional energies. And I know Thomas that this is a very commonplace thing for you as a therapist, you know, helping people to name and recognize what they are actually feeling. But this brings us to a very important another point, which is that there's lots of different emotional energies often in our body-mind, by body-mind I mean that our body and mind are connected, and I liked the word even though it's a bit technical. And that's also something which sometimes doesn't come up in climate emotions research or public discussions. For example, people may sort of have the presupposition, that, you know, should I feel just anger? Or is somebody just feeling anxiety or sadness or just hope? And it's not so, people are feeling many kinds of emotions and feelings and sometimes there can be interesting clusters of emotions, or interlaced emotions, you know, emotions which are somehow tied to each other in the person's experience or the group's experience. And that's something I think Thomas we haven't talked about yet in the podcast, even though we have been talking a lot about climate emotions. But I'm interested about these emotions that go together for some people in certain situations.Doherty: Yeah. When I see the climate wheel (and we'll put a link to this—you can google “climate emotions wheel” and you'll find this and you'll find other famous wheel models of emotion.) I think of the color wheel, you know, when people are doing art and design, when we're mixing colors to get different shades. I haven't seen that, you might have seen that talked about, but you know, these primary colors, you know, primary emotions. Obviously, humans like to categorize things so we're always sort of seeing what box and so they categorize emotions they're always looking for, for more simpler sets of emotions. But the color wheel I think is a helpful analogy. Because feeling blue, whichever emotion you want to categorize for blue, and then of course, feeling yellow emotions, you know, creates green emotions. So we can run with that metaphorically. People who are feeling sad about the environment and also love and curiosity might lead them to some deeper connection with the environment. You know, I don't know. So, I love playing with the metaphors. But yes, and just for the public. I mean, we're … we've, you know, read too many pieces and too much stuff about climate emotions. We're kind of deep into this. But just keeping in mind like Panu was saying, people have researched emotions for forever going back to you know, Aristotle or whatever, and tried to make different categories and different things. And there's some famous researchers out there that have studied people's facial expressions and how emotions are physical things in our bodies and we have the physical posture or facial expression that causes us to feel certain things. So the bi-directional aspect. Psychologist used to be a debate about what came first—a thought or a feeling you know—which was faster? That's an interesting area and, of course, more recently, people have been like yourself, talking about climate emotions and really trying to figure out what people are feeling about all these issues. And that's, that's newer. And that's really interesting. And then we have different even different views on that, right? We know people use regular emotions words like loneliness or loss. You know, Glenn Albrecht is a thinker that has created a whole special vocabulary of climate words to kind of, I think, give justice to these unique kind of … and I think that speaks a little bit to those special feeling mixes that you're talking about. But, you know, “solastalgia” is a well-known word that that a lot of people have heard that was came out of that work, this combination of being nostalgic, but feeling lost for an area that you're actually haven't left, it's idea that the world is leaving you versus you leaving the world. And we're, that's a very interesting, nuanced emotion that's really touched a chord for people. But it's important for people not to get confused about this. These are just diverse, interesting ways, you know, that people are talking about emotions. Right? Is that a fair statement, Panu?Pihkala: Yes, I think definitely, so. And I love the color metaphor that you are using Thomas and I have sometimes been thinking about shapes and colors. So if a person, like many Finns are, is feeling, climate, guilt, and sadness, and hope, at the same time, or next to each other, what kind of form and color a visualization could depict that? And this is something of course, which can sometimes be done in self-reflection or in workshops for it, for example. And it's not scientific, but it's helpful. And that's the most important thing. And Glenn Albrecht work has been highly influential for my own book and solastalgia for example, is in this taxonomy of climate emotions paper. It didn't end up in the wheel, but it's, it's there, broadly. Earth emotions, as Glenn calls them. There's lots of very important shades that are coming out. Two big things that are also related here is one that you hinted at Thomas, which is sort of the length or intensity of emotion. So there may be sort of short-lived emotions or feelings and tentatively, maybe longer time, affective phenomena, for example, mood. And this is something which is important in relation to climate emotions, also. And I know that many people have generally a bit like sad moods and you know, then hopefulness may pop up at times. And if you have a tendency towards sad mood, that doesn't mean that you wouldn't ever experience joy, for example. And this is one of the richnesses of our emotional lives. And especially when they are healthy, when we are able to feel these different emotions, then our capacity to feel all kinds of emotions is larger. And this is a long road for any of us. I know that personally, for example, it's a continuous learning process to be open to various emotional energies. Of course, one needs to also do some regulation about it. And in social situations, we can't just always let all emotion out. That would be very problematic. But it's also very problematic if we do too much suppression or repression. And finally, before, I want to ask what you think about this issue, the “about-ness” of emotions, so climate emotions, some of them are about climate change in general, but then some are about certain aspects of it. And for example, joy, it's very difficult to feel joy about the existence of the climate crisis. But it's very often that I feel joy because of the large number of climate activists, for example. Doherty: I was thinking about some of the research, but the last … What was the last part about climate activists? So I didn't quite follow that piece. The last part of your statement there.Pihkala: Yeah. Well, what I mean, is that some of the so-called positive emotions, may be much easier to feel in relation to, for example, climate action. Yes. Yeah. Then to climate change in general?Doherty: Yes, exactly! I was watching some film recording of the recent climate march in New York City. And I saw a little bit of the speech of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, you know, and it was very uplifting and it was, you know, you could … I could sense the energy of the crowd there. And so I think that's one of the one of the aspects, one of the many is like, we don't feel them [emotions] only in isolation, they're social, you know, social things that happen within groups of people. So that's, that's one angle here. And what is, there's a saying, you might know it, I think it's a Swedish saying about being together cuts our grief and half, but it doubles our joy, you know, something like that. So, being together with people is both helpful for sad feelings. It helps to bear the weight of sad feelings, we're sharing them, but like, being together and sharing them positively kind of multiplies, … I mean, we could do a whole podcast on emotions. We do! But we could do a whole other podcast just on the science of emotion. And the social aspect and the neuropsychological, brain aspect of it, and the philosophical, social justice aspects of this kind of stuff. It's just fascinating.Pihkala: Yeah, I think that's a great, great point Thomas and very relevant for climate emotions. Because some of them are so heavily intertwined with our social relations. And that's why, for example, I didn't just apply any theory of basic or universal emotions, because those are more related to, you know, “what did we get in evolution type of thing,” and what sort of emotional energies we need, for example, if we live in a forest or jungle, but then amidst other members of our tribes, and also contemporarily, there's all these dynamics about guilt, and honor, for example, social approval or disapproval, and feelings related to sharing life, but also social hierarchies and so on. So many of our climate emotions, are heavily moderated by the social dynamics. And that's, I think, an important aspect.Doherty: Yeah, yeah. Yeah. So there's a saying, you know, all models are wrong, some are useful. So all these different models are limited in some way. They, they obscure something. And that's why we have different thinkers. And that's why I have people with different models, because they show things that that are lost. So a wheel image captures some things, but a list captures another process. You know, I mean, one way to moderate our climate emotions, and is go to d…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Season 3, Episode 4: An Australian Climate and Emotions Perspective with Dr. Joëlle Gergis Oct 13, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Benny Hassum Season 3, Episode 4: An Australian Climate and Emotions Perspective with Dr. Joëlle GergisJoëlle Gergis is an award-winning climate scientist and writer from the Australian National University. Joëlle was a lead author on the IPCC 6th Assessment report: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. As the southern hemisphere summer approaches, Joëlle Gergis spoke with Panu and Thomas about her most recent book Humanity's Moment: A Climate Scientist's Case for Hope and the unique emotional challenges of confronting the human and wildlife toll of climate disasters in Australia. As Joelle noted, Australia is one of the world’s most vulnerable developed nations in terms of climate disruptions as well as a leader in fossil fuel production. So, Australians’ efforts at coping and making change are important learning for others around the globe. LinksJoëlle GergisHumanity's Moment: A Climate Scientist's Case for HopeEssay: ‘I feel my heart breaking today’ – a climate scientist’s path through grief towards hopeFear and Wonder podcast“8 in 10 Australians are concerned about climate change with a clear public expectation of Government action”Tara Crandon 2023 Our mood usually lifts in spring. But after early heatwaves and bushfires, this year may be different Is this how you feel? Letters from climate scientistsLesley Head & Teresa Harada 2017 “Keeping the Heart a Long Way from the Brain: The Emotional Labour of Climate Scientists.” See previous CCH episodes with Susanne Moser and Daniella MolnarTranscriptTranscript edited for clarity and brevity. Thomas Doherty: Please support the climate change and happiness podcast see the donate page at climatechangeandhappiness.com.[music: “CC&H theme music”]Doherty: Well, hello, I'm Thomas Doherty.Panu Pihkala: And I am Panu Pihkala.Doherty: And welcome to climate change and happiness, our podcast. This is a show for people around the globe who are thinking and feeling deeply about climate change and other environmental issues. And as we say, we're all climate change emotions all the time. That's what we're focused on here. Even though people are more open to talk about their feelings and thoughts about climate change, it's still not common to have open conversations about these things, particularly about the emotional level. So it's what we do here. And today we are very honored to have a guest.Joëlle Gergis: So, I'm Dr. Joëlle Gergis. I'm a climate scientist and writer from the Australian National University.Doherty: And we've heard of Joelle. I've got a copy of her book here Humanity's Moment and Joelle is, if you're in the know about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and how this group comes together across the world and meets, and Joelle is one of the scientists that's involved with the IPCC. We'll talk a little bit about her journey and her background. And Joelle is our first guest from Australia. So, this is a great opportunity for us to think about the continent of Australia, and all the unique experiences that are happening for people there. I know we have listeners in Australia, so this will be nice. And Panu do you want to get us started off in our dialogue?Pihkala: Warmly welcome, Joelle, very pleased to meet you. And there's been very interesting conversations between Australian people around climate emotions and all the strong contradictions around them, also related to governmental policies and physical impacts. And I've personally benefited from quite pioneering work by the Australian Psychological Society and a great organization called Psychology for a Safe Climate. So there's some great material for constructive encounters with climate emotions. And that's something very notable in your work, Joelle. I think that you are so open about speaking of climate emotions, as a scientist, and there's some research going on internationally about the emotions of climate scientists. That's one topic we might touch upon here. But firstly, we'd like to ask you a bit about your journey. How did you become so heavily involved with global climate change and end up being a writer and researcher who is open about various sides of the issue?Gergis: Yeah, thanks for having me. Firstly, on the podcast, it's a real pleasure to be here. And it's also quite an interesting thing to be the first Australian to speak to you guys. So, I guess as a young person growing up in Australia, you know, we have such a ferocious climate. And I remember a particular time in my childhood in 1994, when there was a really severe bushfire season, and there was ash falling all throughout my neighborhood. There was a thick smoke. And I wondered to myself, well, what is it that makes Australia's climate so erratic and so extreme? And that led me to wanting to study environmental science and climatology at university.And I guess it's been a 25 year journey, really, for me in terms of teaching, researching and writing about climate change. And then that journey led me eventually to be selected as a lead author on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report. And for me, I suppose that was a real turning point in my career, where all of a sudden, I could see what was happening at home in my own country of Australia. And Australia, as you probably know, is often seen on the news in very dramatic ways, whether it's a wildfire or it's a flood or a very severe drought. So, in many ways, Australia is a bit of a poster child for climate change in terms of some of the real world impacts. And we're actually considered the most vulnerable nation in the developed world when it comes to climate change. So, it's a really interesting perspective to be both, you know, researching climate variability and climate change in a country like Australia, but also thinking about different ways of communicating our science.And so for me, that opportunity to really think about what is it that is getting in the way of emotionally engaging the average person and a topic like climate change, because it can be so overwhelming, and so soul destroying, in many ways for a lot of people, because of the enormity of the challenge we face is huge. And, sometimes people feel very powerless in the face of that. And of course, you would know also in Australia, we're the largest exporter of coal and liquefied natural gas. So, there's been a very entrenched resistance, if you like, to actually implementing climate policy that is meaningful in any sort of scientific terms. But also just thinking about what it is to be, I guess, an Australian at this moment and how we show up on the global stage.So really, my work has led me deep into the heart of the IPCC. And as I was working on the IPCC, there were all sorts of extreme events unfolding. You might have recalled the "Black Summer" wildfire season that we had in 2019-2020, in that summer period, and that basically saw around 25% of Australia's forests burned in a single bushfire season. In an extreme year, you might get 2%. So to get 25%, it was a global record in terms of the sheer enormity of the blazes. And now the koala is actually considered an endangered species along the east coast of this country. And that's not something I ever thought I'd experienced in my lifetime.So, as an Australian involved in a United Nations process, I realized I had quite a unique perspective on the climate crisis. And it made me want to write about it. I realized that I could join the dots between the different things that I was saying, and I wanted to help people who don't have a scientific background really follow the conversation to understand the profound moment that we find ourselves in right now.Doherty: Yeah, I mean, Joelle it is interesting, because for someone like myself in the United States, I see similarities to the US political situation in terms of entrenched fossil fuel interests that are deeply—this is not unique to the US or Australia, either—it's deeply woven into the fabric of society and the economy and people's identities. And then also, yes, Australia being the kind of canary in the coal mine so to speak, even going back to my early environmental work regarding ozone depletion, and chlorofluorocarbons back in the 1990s. You know, one of the things we talk about in our show is environmental identity, our identity in relation to nature in the natural world. And I think the pathway to being a scientist, to really be empirical and really study, is a certain kind of environmental identity [and a] certain set of values. So, I was wondering if you could say a little bit about that. There must have been something that drew you in the science direction, to the measurement, to really understanding, including ancient patterns and things like that. I'm curious about that Gergis: Yeah, I guess for me, My motivation for being a scientist is driven by my love of the natural world. And, and I guess that extends into understanding it in all of its intricacy. And I guess I really enjoyed and responded to learning about science at university and also throughout high school. And so I guess, for me, that scientific understanding is just another way of knowing and understanding the world. And I was drawn to it because I quite liked the way it could be quantified and measured, and then compared in different parts of the world in a comparable way. So science gives us sort of universal tools that we can use to compare across different regions. And I think that's very powerful. While it is important to have a local subjective understanding of things, I also kind of responded to the idea which is, is embedded in science, which is that it provides us with a global framework to understand the world and I think that's really, really powerful. So for me, I was drawn into wanting to understand science from that empirical perspective. But my motivation for being a scientist comes from a very deep personal place, which is really wanting to protect and understand what it is that we are experiencing right now. So I guess it was sort of the joining of two different worlds for me.Pihkala: Thanks for sharing all that. In your writings, you're also very open about vulnerability and many people have different kinds of experiences, and sometimes also traumatic ones in our past, and you've been exemplary in being open about the impacts of those kinds of experiences. So that's something I highly appreciate. And in the global networks around climate emotion, or eco emotions -- and that's, of course, something we very often discuss. So how to, on one hand, share our vulnerability and build strength out of inner vulnerability. But then, of course, also to protect people -- that one can't be open about all the things in all places. And, sometimes, we need to have different kinds of protective layers, either social or psychological, or combinations of this. And, as mentioned earlier, you have been very open about various climate emotions you have as a scientist, and since we've been talking about science, could you share a bit about that part of your journey? How was it to start engaging more with emotions as a scientist, because Western science has this history of, of, you know, reason over emotional analysis?Gergis: Yeah. And I actually think it's a little bit of an outdated idea, because I believe that you can be professional and rational and logical, but still have an emotional response to your work. And as I was working on the IPCC report, there were just so many extreme events playing out in my country that I could no longer ignore the emotional response that was coming up in me, and to pretend like I was cold and detached around that was disingenuous. So for me, I felt I couldn't help it, I had to be real about it. But I don't think that compromises in any way, my ability to be professional.And so for instance, one example was that we are home to the Great Barrier Reef, and the Great Barrier Reef is the largest living organism on the planet. And since 2015, we've seen 50% of a die-off from repeated mass coral bleaching. So, we're actually seeing large scale ecosystem collapse right now in real time. And we're all bearing witness to this. And for me, that is something that became increasingly hard to not speak out, because as a scientist, I understand the cause of that. And that's the increase in our ocean temperatures. And so for me, it was something that became something I couldn't walk past.And then I also mentioned the wildfires of 2019 - 2020, where we saw about 3 billion animals either killed or displaced in a single bushfire season. Again, we're talking about extraordinary levels of destruction. And our ecosystems are still recovering from that time and may never recover in some areas. So, in our subtropical rainforest ecosystems, which are World Heritage listed, so they're of universal scientific and cultural value, we were seeing areas that are usually lush and moist areas that are, you know, waterfalls and mosses and ferns, actually ignite, just to give you an idea of how dry and hot it was. So watching the areas that I love disappear before my very eyes, and literally working on the IPCC report, as these events are unfolding, it became basically unbearable, to be a witness and to not say something.And so that's really where I feel I started to become more vocal as a commentator and started to speak out more, I guess, in a personal way. And because I think a lot of scientists feel afraid of the very thing that you said, Panu, which is that people will consider us to be irrational or unprofessional, or this sort of thing. But, then when you speak to these people, at conferences, over a cup of tea, they'll tell you how they really feel about it. And so, with my writing, I've actually found that I've had quite a few colleagues contact me and say, Thank you. Thank you for actually doing the work that you're doing and being brave enough to share your emotional response because I feel that too.And you know, maybe it's also a gendered thing in terms of this. Science is very dominated by men. And as women, there's about, for example, in IPCC in the working group I was involved in, about 25% of us were women. So it is a very male dominated area. And I'm not passing judgment around that. All I'm saying is that there are different ways of relating, and I guess women can sometimes be a bit more open about their emotional response.And so, for me, it feels like a really important part of an authentic conversation that we need to have and that were having anyway behind closed doors, in terms of whether people are going off to see therapists or talking to their friends and colleagues. And the truth is, when you speak to people who are on the front line of say, recording ecological changes in our landscapes, they're coming back from their field trips and weeping in their offices, because they're realizing that they're seeing changes that are a one way street, that they see it, there are some areas that will not recover. And we're seeing that in parts of Australia already right now. So I think I've just shone a light on something that already exists, it's there. And I'm just trying to give some voice to that. And to provide us with a language to be able to speak about it. Again, we're talking about science being this sort of universal language.But it's also sometimes when we're talking about the realm of emotions, that's usually the realm of, I guess, psychologists, social scientists, people who aren't really involved in the physical sciences…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Season 3, Episode 3: Oppenheimer and Nuclear Anxiety Sep 29, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Oscar Ävalos

    Season 3, Episode 3: Oppenheimer and Nuclear-Anxiety

    Thomas and Panu reflected on the recent Oppenheimer film, and how cold war-era fear and anxiety about global nuclear armageddon compares with contemporary fear and anxiety about the threats global climate change poses to society and the livability on our planet. Thomas spoke to the challenge of weighing the benefits of nuclear power as a strategy to help combat the climate crisis against the environmental dangers, ongoing dangers of nuclear conflict, and the still toxic legacy of radioactive waste from the construction of atomic weapons. Panu reflected on various forms of anxiety and other feelings these dilemmas inspire in us, including the “anxiety of responsibility” we feel about making decisions about them.

    Links

    • Oppenheimer Christopher Nolan 2023 Universal.

    • The Day after Trinity John Else 1981 Oppenheimer documentary

    • Atomic Cafe Kevin Rafferty, Jayne Loader and Pierce Rafferty 1982 Cold war newsreel documentary

      Trailer and Full Movie

    • 1950’s Baby Tooth Survey and Early Campaigns to Raise Awareness about Dangers of Over Ground Atomic Bomb Testing in the US

    • On the History of Nuclear Testing

    • ‘The Psychic Toll of the Nuclear Age’ Essay by Robert Jay Lifton, The New York Times, (1982, Sept 26)

    • Robert Jay Lifton on COVID and Death Anxiety

    • Panu Pihkala 2018‘Death, the Environment, and Theology’. Dialog 57, 287–94

    Transcript

    [The Climate Change and Happiness Transcript is on holiday.]


    Season 3, Episode 2: On Walk and Talk Therapy with Jennifer Udler Sep 15, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Ifrah Akhter

    Season 3, Episode 2: On Walk and Talk Therapy with Jennifer Udler

    In a session devoted to the healing aspects of walking outdoors, Thomas and Panu spoke with social worker Jennifer Udler, author of the new book Walk and Talk Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide to Incorporating Movement and Nature into Your Practice. Their discussion touched on the practicalities of walking therapy as a modality, philosophical and transformative aspects of walking in terms of metaphors and pilgrimages, and the recognition that walking opens us both to the wonder of the natural world, and also dark aspects, including lack of safe spaces for some, and a new normal in which we all cannot separate our walking from climate change effects like heat and wildfire smoke. A key takeaway was the importance of developing a consistent relationship with a specific place, across seasons, times and weathers.

    Links

    • Jennifer Udler

    • Walk and Talk Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide to Incorporating Movement and Nature into Your Practice

    • On walking in damaged places: Trebbe Johnson Radical Joy for Hard Times

    • Erica Berry (2023, March 21) Climate Grief Was Clouding My Time Outside. So I Turned to Ecotherapy

    • Jennifer recommends the Facebook group Walking, outdoor therapists

    Transcript

    [The Climate Change and Happiness Transcript is on holiday.]


    Season 3, Episode 1: Coping with “Unnatural Disasters” Sep 01, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Derek Owens

    Season 3, Episode 1: Coping with “Unnatural Disasters”

    Panu and Thomas offered listeners advice with how to cope with the new class of “unnatural disasters” that have beset the globe in past weeks and months—horrific damage from wildfires that are supercharged or that arise in places we don’t expect them, coping with simultaneous earthquakes and hurricanes—in Greece, Canada, Los Angeles, Lahaina and beyond. Thomas explained key differences in how varied types of disasters are experienced and understood. He reflected on how the loss of a treasured place like Lahaina touches both Hawaiian natives and the many visitors who have had special life experiences there (with echoes of New Orleans and the Katrina disaster). Panu shared insights from his research and the recognition that coping calls for “skills in grief,” and when appropriate, “skills in joy.” Thomas introduced the concept of “disaster subcultures”: recognizing how groups see and react to the same disasters quite differently, for example, government officials, professional first responders, and the general public—and the resulting “disaster diversity” we need to respect. What are the pros and cons of concepts like “Polycrisis” for our coping? Either as a technical description of simultaneous catastrophic events or a blanket term for a sense of global breakdown? Join us and share your thoughts.

    Links

    • Elizabeth Kolbert on “Unnatural Disasters” (2023, Aug 20, The New Yorker):

    “After visiting the wreckage of Lahaina, Hawaii’s governor, Josh Green, called the Maui fires the “largest natural disaster Hawaii has ever experienced.” In fact, the fires would more accurately be labeled an ‘unnatural disaster.’ As David Beilman, a professor of geography and environment at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, recently pointed out, for most of Hawaii’s history fire simply wasn’t part of the islands’ ecology. “This Maui situation is an Anthropocene phenomenon,” he told USA Today.” (2023, Aug 20, The New Yorker)

    • Ville Lähde on “Polycrisis” (2023, Aeon)

    “There is ‘a’ polycrisis and ‘the’ polycrisis. That is, on the one hand, people are trying to find a clear working definition of a polycrisis, to define its key characteristics, in order to forge a research concept with which to examine a diverse range of concatenations of events . . . On the other hand, ‘polycrisis’ is understood not as a common noun but as a proper noun, denoting this particular stage of world history. There is only one polycrisis: this historical epoch, when humanity has created a world interconnected and interdependent to an unprecedented degree, combining vast material wealth with radical inequality and teetering on the threshold of ecological collapse.”

    Transcript

    [The Climate Change and Happiness Transcript is on holiday.]


    Season 2, Episode 26: “Breathing the Sky” — Climate Coping for Children and Adults with Leslie Davenport Aug 18, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Bethany Beck

    Season 2, Episode 26: “Breathing the Sky” — Climate Coping for Children and Adults with Leslie Davenport

    Panu and Thomas were joined by Leslie Davenport who discussed her 2017 book Emotional Resiliency in the Era of Climate Change, and recent All the Feelings Under the Sun designed for children. Leslie reflected on her background in dance and as a member of an interdisciplinary medical team and how this contributed to her focus on the body and creative visualization in her ecotherapy work.

    Links

    • Leslie Davenport

    Media

    • Sindha Agha with Leslie Davenport How to Find Balance in the Midst of Climate Crisis | PBS Short Docs

    • PBS News Weekend: Climate change causing a sense of despair? Here are some ways to combat it

    Teaching

    • Climate Psychology Certificate at California Institute of Integral Studies

    Books

    • Emotional Resiliency in the Era of Climate Change: A Clinician's Guide

    • All the Feelings Under the Sun: How to Deal With Climate Change

    Transcript

    [The Climate Change and Happiness Transcript is on holiday.]


    Season 2, Episode 25: Flight Guilt and other Emotions about Travel Aug 04, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Stefan Fluck

    Season 2, Episode 25: Flight Guilt and other Emotions about Travel

    In this episode, Thomas and Panu focused on the emotional aspects of travel, particularly air travel, and all the competing thoughts and feelings we have about this. Our journeys to see the world and our far flung loved ones are a central part of our lives. But, in this age of climate crisis, air travel—whether through privilege or as a sacrifice and necessity–opens us up to troubling ethical issues about our own contributions to climate problems and being trapped in an earth-damaging system of inequality and destructive tourism. Panu brought his usual wise perspective on climate emotions. Thomas shared the “UR3OK” model he uses to help people make environmentally-responsible decisions (Understand, Reduce-Reuse-Resist…, Offset, and be Kind to ourselves and others in the process).

    Links

    Approaches to Flight Shame

    • Piskorz (2019) European countries have created new words to describe the feeling of 'flight shame'

    • Reynolds (2023) Should we feel guilty about flying? [Puts individual flights in perspective. For example, only about 2% to 4% of the global population fly internationally and 1% of the world population emits 50% of CO2 from commercial aviation.]

    • Wormbs and Söderberg (2021). Knowledge, Fear, and Conscience: Reasons to Stop Flying Because of Climate Change [Research on reasons people chose to stop flying.]

    • Thomas’ “UR3OK” model

    Transcript

    [The Climate Change and Happiness Transcript is on holiday.]


    Season 2, Episode 24: Revisiting the Myth of Climate Apathy with Renée Lertzman Jul 21, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Ruslan Alekso Season 2, Episode 24: Revisiting the Myth of Climate Apathy with Renée LertzmanPeople have many kinds of feelings about climate and ecological crises, and many remain hidden under the surface, either because people are unsure about these or talking about them does not feel safe. In this episode, Thomas and Panu had a dialogue with Renée Lertzman, a pioneer in research and practical work about environmental feelings from a psychoanalytic perspective. Renée told of her work exposing “the myth of apathy” about climate change (people are generally not uncaring or indifferent to this issue, but lack tools to express and people who will take time to listen). Renée also explained her “Three A’s” method (helping people share their anxiety, ambivalence – mixed feelings – and their aspirations about eco and climate issues).LinksGreat Lakes factsRenée LertzmanThe Myth of Apathy paperProject InsideOutRenée’s TED Talk: How to Turn Climate Anxiety into ActionTranscriptTranscript edited for clarity and brevity.Thomas Doherty: Please support the climate change and happiness podcast see the donate page at climatechangeandhappiness.com.[music: “CC&H theme music”]Doherty: Hello, I'm Thomas Doherty. Pihkala: And I am Panu Pihkala.Renée Lertzman: Hello, good to see you. I'm Renée Lertzman.Doherty: And Renée is an old time colleague and friend of ours, who's yet another one of these innovators in this whole area of climate and emotions. And so we're looking forward to talking with Renée who's coming in from the Bay Area. And Panu, do you want to get us started?Pihkala: Yes, very good to see you, Renée. Again. We have met live once in Finland. A major Finnish company invited you to give a keynote speech. And I had already been reading many of your influential writings. It's really helped me with these nuanced dynamics of environmental attitudes and emotions and behavior. You're involved in a lot of things. But perhaps we could start from the journey itself. How was it for you? Would you like to share something about how you became so interested in these complex dynamics of environmental issues?Doherty: Yeah.Lertzman: Oh, well, that's a good question. So basically, first off, thanks for having me. I know both of you. And love both of you. So I'm really excited about our conversation. I started this journey. I found it when I was quite young. When I was a teenager. And I grew up in the San Francisco Bay area. I was exposed here and there to some information about what was going on with the environment. But it wasn't until I went to college. And I was planning to be a psychologist. And that was always very clear. Because I myself had benefited from psychotherapy when I was in high school. When I was around 15 and 16. And I knew I was going to be a psychologist. So I went to university. And while I was in training, as a psych major, I took a variety of classes. And one of them happened to be an environmental studies 101 kind of introductory course. And as I tell this story, in a variety of places, including the TED talk, I ended up giving.That experience really derailed me. It was so unexpected. The impact it had on me psychologically, emotionally, you know, existentially. And at the time, it was the late 1980s. There wasn't really a lot of discussion about what all this means for us. And so it was a very solitary journey. I was, you know, in therapy and all of that. But no one at the time was really talking about what it means to process ecological crises, including climate change. So at the time, it wasn't specific to climate change for me. It was the whole confluence of the headline as humans have, you know, irreparably altered and damaged our beautiful, amazing planet. So that was the big takeaway from the class. And that's a lot to process. And then it was like, well, what do I do with this. You know, so, you know, that kind of started everything off for me.Doherty: Yeah. So listeners, you know, that's the thing. Students, listeners. It is exactly what happens. And People are a little more aware today. I've I noticed teachers and students are aware. But really it is. Yes, the planet is irrevocably changed. We have 30 years or else we're doomed. The bell rings. And then we carry our books to the next class, you know. So it's this real, this kind of odd feeling we're supposed to carry this and walk around. So that leads to the whole. I mean, I think, Renée, one thing that you're known for. At that time anyway, was just realizing, hey, there's a whole school of thought about this. Like these psychoanalytic folks have thought about all this. And the idea of splitting. And all this sort of stuff. Is that kind of, can we talk about that a little bit? And how you found that helpful and led to your early research and your book and things?Lertzman: Yeah, definitely. So I am and was and am in love with psychoanalytic clinical studies, research and perspectives. And by that I mean, work that's written by people who work with people in clinical settings, around, you know, healing, and trauma and anxiety and all of that. And so I've been immersed in that world for a long time. But for me, when I encounter that work, specifically around, how do we, as humans, process really difficult, challenging information? How do we work through guilt? You know, how do we work through shame? How do we work through conflict? You know, where we are pulled in different directions. It's been very hard for me to encounter that work, and not immediately think about our ecological and climate crisis. And connect the dots. Even if a lot of that work isn't speaking about that explicitly. And I'm talking about going back to whether it's Freud, or whether it's Melanie Klein, or whether it's Bion or whether it's, you know, a whole variety of very thoughtful, deep thinkers and practitioners. They're not necessarily writing about ecological crises or climate change. But my experience is it's a rich treasure trove of perspectives, tools and insights.And so I've been basically, since that time in the late 80s, really connecting those dots. And seeing how we apply this in a way that isn't simple, simple. Like, you know, it's not apples to apples. It's like, well, how do we take this and make this meaningful, and useful for the human condition right now, as we enter into this, you know, Anthropocene moment. And to me, the concept of even where we are right now as a human species. And that we are actually having to come to terms with what we've done, is itself an unprecedented kind of existential situation. That I think we need all hands on deck as far as the human sciences. And, you know, cultural studies. And, you know, we need all of it. But I really feel like at the heart of it, is the psychological. And that has been missing for so many years, for reasons that I think both are confounding to me, and make total sense. Because if we take what we know about humans, and how we have this capacity to sort of disavow or kind of split off. Then yeah, we avoid talking about emotion and feeling and the messier stuff because it's hard.But now we're at a moment where it's really clear with this conversation, your work, you know, we're in a very different place now. Yeah. So that's kind of my fundamental orientation. And then, you know, that led to my spending many years doing research, to try to deepen this perspective. And really see how I could make sense of what we think of as apathy, you know. What we, I'm using we, in quotes. Like, people working in the environmental and climate space have been in the grip of a lot of, I think, myths about and assumptions about humans that are frankly, not grounded in psychology at all. So in a way, what I'm trying to do is an intervention and say, you know what, like, we need to stop saying things like people are apathetic. We need to stop saying, oh, how do I get other people to care about these issues. That's actually completely backwards. Completely. And yet, it's really taken hold, you know, for a lot of people. Like, oh, I gotta make you care about this. Well, that's just not the case.Pihkala: Yeah. Warm thanks for dwelling on that, Renée. In a recent interview, you also referred to the strange dissociation you noticed in the society at the same time when you heard these very worrisome facts about the ecological crisis in classrooms. And that's very deep. Dissociation, I think, is one of the reasons why the psychoanalytic and psychodynamic tradition was so important in the early 2000s, for example, in providing more understanding about the deeper dynamics. I think that any, you know, just simple coping theory is unable to explain that.Because the discrepancies are so strong. And one of the things that I was drawn to in Thomas's early work was also an effort to integrate coping theory and defense theory, for example. So there's some influences from psychodynamic dynamics there also.And Renée, you were part of this very influential book called Engaging with Climate Change, edited by Sally Weintrobe, which provided a lot of insights from the psychodynamic dynamic and analytic traditions. And for those listeners who may have heard very critical things about the psychoanalytic tradition, I want to mention that in her research Renée is very careful in that application. And utilizes very critical research methods there. So there's a lot in there. For your data, you did years of empirical research. And that might be a logical path to go from here. And it actually links with Thomas's personal history also and Great Lakes, also related to this “myth of apathy”. So would you like to speak a bit more about that?Lertzman: Sure. So I ended up going on to do various graduate programs. I first focused on environmental communication. Did a master's in communication studies. And then went on to really want to just talk with people. And listen and work, you know, really conduct qualitative research in a community. And so I ended up, it's a long story, but I ended up my research was sponsored by an organization based in the Great Lakes. The Wege Foundation. And they were generous. Well, it was actually a specific individual, Jonathan Wege, who sponsored my research with the one requirement that it relate to the Great Lakes in some way. And so I ended up becoming a fellow with an organization in Madison, Wisconsin. And was connected with a community in the region.And I ended up spending time in Green Bay, Wisconsin. And for me, at the time, that was like the equivalent of going to, you know, Sub Saharan Africa or something. Because, you know, I'm from California. I've lived in the East Coast, the West Coast, but being in the Midwest was really new and different for me. And I absolutely loved every minute of it. I embedded myself in this community in Green Bay that welcomed me in. And I spent time listening and talking with people who. I had a market research firm, who very generously, it's kind of amazing to think about it, now sent out a survey to their database of 1000s of people in the region. And I designed the survey very carefully, to show me who, from an environmentalist perspective, would appear to be not engaged and end quote, apathetic. Who would be normally written off by an environmental organization, you know, like, oh, they don't read anything about this. They don't watch anything about this. They don't talk about this with their friends and family. And I decided to hone in and do in depth interviews and conversations with a subset of those people who I would have been like, well, why would I talk to them? Because they're not engaged. So it was pretty edgy and scary for me to do that. And I designed these interviews very inspired by psychodynamic and psychoanalytic research.And all that means is that there's a lot of listening. There's a lot of presence. I'm asking a lot of questions. And I'm not using a script. So this was a very different way of conducting social science research.You know, I have a PhD in social science from Cardiff University. You know, it's pretty traditional. But I went and did this methodology that's referred to as psychosocial research. And I found the experience just fundamentally changed me. You know, I came out, in the middle of doing the research in Green Bay, I came up with this concept of the myth of apathy. And then I pitched a piece about that to a magazine. And wrote it quickly. It ran. And that piece led to maybe 10 speaking engagements around the world because it just struck a chord. And the argument, which you can still find online. It was published by the ecologist. It's still out there. 2008. Where I argue that, you know, it's really not that people are apathetic, there's so much else going on. But we have to listen. We have to show up differently. We have to show up with compassion, with empathy. And to really appreciate it. Like, some of these people I interviewed knew more about what's going on with the ecology of the Great Lakes. The water quality. The air quality.Than most people. Think about that. The people I interviewed knew more about it than most people and yet, would have been written off and had been written off by the environmental community.Doherty: So you know, Renée, I'm thinking about this growing up in Buffalo, myself. Buffalo, New York. And on the shores of the Great Lakes. Lake Erie. Lake Ontario. And just the reality, even myself growing up in the 70s, you know, with the lakes being part of the culture. My parents grew up swimming in lakes. By the time I was a child, Lake Erie was seen as, you know, poisoned and polluted. And then we have the weather that comes off the lakes with the snow and the lake effect snow. So it's a big part of people's reality. And so you are tapping into that whole thing. This is before all the really obvious polarization about climate change, too. And just people's basic thinking about this. So it's really nice to go back in time a little bit to see what this was like. And you had this whole myth of apathy.For listeners, that means it's a myth. It's not that people don't care. As Renée was saying, they know a lot. It's just that they might either feel powerless about an issue. Or it's a taboo topic for their community. Or they don't have a way to plug in. And so for their own mental health, they package this care away. You know, they put it away, because they can't do anything about it. And I think you revealed that. And then you talked about these three A's, you know. And I think you do that even now with your work in corporations. You have people talk about what they're anxious about. And their ambivalence. Their different kinds of feelings. And then what they aspire to. Which I really think is inspiring. Do you want to talk about the three A's and how that worked out there?Lertzman: Yeah, sure. So that was a very clear, helpful reframe of what you just offered. So thank you. That's exactly what the myth of apathy is about. Which is that we go around making assumptions and reading into people's behavior, and making interpretations. And we project a lack of care or concern. Which I find deeply problematic and inaccurate. It puts it back on us to try to tune in and understand what's actually going on. So the three A's is a shorthand that I came out of that research with. That I designed. It took a long time to get to the three A's. And I am very proud, because to be honest, what happened was, after my research, I got a position at Portland State University. And I was te…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Season 2, Episode 23: Climate Emotions in the Family Jul 07, 2023
    Show notes

    How does climate change impact family relationships? In this follow-up to their recent talk about couples, Thomas and Panu discussed how expressing feelings about climate change and other environmental problems is intertwined with family dynamics in many ways. Depending on the values and communication style of your family of origin, taking a stand on climate can make you a “hero” or a “black sheep.” Fear of bringing new children into an overheated world also affects those who would be grandparents. Simplistic messages that portray young people as ecologically aware and elders as being in denial are not supported by research. Alarm, concern and caution about global warming are shared by a majority in every generation in the US. While your and my family are different, we are all more together than we think.


    Season 2, Episode 22: Children and Nature with Louise Chawla Jun 23, 2023
    Show notes

    image credit | Markus Spiske Season 2, Episode 22: Children and Nature with Louise ChawlaIn this episode we look at the question “What makes for a healthy relationship between children and nature?” and by extension for all of us. To help with this, Panu and Thomas met with Louise Chawla, one of the eminent researchers of environmental psychology and child development in relation to nature. Louise described her own youth and sense of nature being “an eternal world” and how she has listened to children around the world describe their own beliefs and increasingly “fearful imaginings.” She, Panu, and Thomas discussed how to support children, share in their curiosity, and enlist them as collaborators as we all cope with losses and strive to make our lives better. LinksLouise Chawla, Some key papers: (2022) Passive patient or active agent? An under-explored perspective on the benefits of time in nature for learning and wellbeing (2019) Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss (1998) Significant Life Experiences Revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivityTranscriptTranscript edited for clarity and brevity. Thomas Doherty: Please support the climate change and happiness podcast see the donate page at climatechangeandhappiness.com.[music: “CC&H theme music”]Doherty: Well, hello, I'm Thomas Doherty.Panu Pihkala: And I am Panu Pihkala.Doherty: And welcome to Climate Change and Happiness. Our podcast, the show for people around the globe who are thinking and feeling deeply about climate change and other environmental issues. And this is a place where we do allow ourselves to be with our thoughts and our feelings and our emotions. And today, we have a special guest. Someone that I've been able to work with in the past that I have not met for about a decade.Louise Chawla: Hello, I'm Louise Chawla. I'm a professor emerita at the University of Colorado in Boulder. And I'm part of the program in environmental design there. And now that I'm retired I work with their community engagement design and research center primarily. I have a workplace there. And I helped create the center. So I'm very much involved in how do you bring research and design, which means really, the entire physical world out there, including the natural world together on big environmental and social topics of our time. And I came to that from a background initially in child development. Then my master's in education. And then as I discovered, what I'm really interested about is what children learn outside the classroom, when they are out and about in their communities. Both socially, culturally, and about the natural world and their cities. And so I did a doctorate in environmental psychology, where we focus on people's relationships with the physical world out there. And it's a discipline that's been around since the 1970s. I entered it in 1980. So that is my focus: What are our relationships with the world beyond ourselves and our immediate human societies?Doherty: Yeah, that's great. And Louise is a pioneer in this research of children's experience of nature. And a lot of what we know in terms of healthy child development and people's environmental identities and the role of mentors comes out of Louise's work. And she's a bridge between the original environmental psychology people that were studying built places and design, and the more recent focus on mental health and identity and environmental behaviors that we have now. So it's really great to have Louise. And we'll be talking about a lot. Panu, do you want to get us started in our conversation?Pihkala: Warmly welcome, Louise, also from my part. We have been exchanging some emails online. And I of course know your work from environmental education research. Many Finns have also been curious about studies of children's natural experiences and nature connection. This theme of having significant experiences in natural environments is just one part of that. And speaking of that, would you like to share with us some of your own earlier journey? You described some parts of your professional journey, but do you see some developments in your own childhood and youth and adolescence which led you towards this part of life and research?Chawla: Well, absolutely. That's why I'm doing what I'm doing. I was very fortunate to have a childhood where I lived kind of between two places. One was an old suburb of New York City. Where the back border of our home was a brook. And that went up to a marsh. And then beyond the marsh was a woods. And there was an old orchard and woodlots and so forth. And so I had all of that. Which is where I spent just countless hours growing up as a child. But I also had family in New York City. So it was still a generation, where I just had to show up for dinner. And I was able to roam around initially, Greenwich Village. And then when the family moved to the edge of Chinatown, and Brooklyn Bridge. That part of lower Manhattan. So I've never really drawn a distinction between nature and cities and nature and towns. Because at their best, even our densely inhabited places, have nature in them. Certainly when you're a child, they have child sized nature in them. And of course, New York City has great parks. It had the rivers. And so that was so important to me that when I discovered there is a field of environmental psychology when I was a master's student doing a degree in child development and education, I realized immediately that's what I want to spend my career doing. How can we create places and cultures where every child in the world has an opportunity to have those kinds of opportunities to discover the natural world and the cultural world together? And, you know, of course I'm not going to achieve that. But I think it's like our goal of living in harmony with nature, as Rachel Carson said. You know, it's the horizon we work toward. And having that horizon keeps us going. And will we perfectly achieve it, maybe not, but it still keeps us going.Doherty: Yeah, there's so much I'm thinking for listeners who are parents who are thinking about how they might want to be the best parents they can for their children. Or for all of us we're thinking about our own childhoods, you know, I grew up in Buffalo, New York. And had a certain view of nature based on that. Panu, of course, has his view. And all the listeners all have their own places. But since you've been doing this for a while, I wonder if we can just help people to see the larger trends first. And then we can drill down to some really specific, you know, concepts and things. But Louise, you must have seen a lot because, like you say you yourself are of an age where you were lucky to have safe access to nature. And the urban rural divide wasn't so black and white. And then, of course, over the last few decades, we've had this whole child and nature movement. And the work of Richard Louv. And this “Last Child in the Woods” kind of insight that, you know, life has changed for people in the modern world – being much more technological. And nature and the outdoors not being seen as safe. And people must be much more concerned about liability. And different views on parks. And I'm also thinking of David Sobel's work and other people. What do you see as the broad trend that brings us to the present day? Like what do you think, how would you land us now, you know, given what you've seen over the last couple of decades?Chawla: Well, you're entirely correct, Thomas, in saying within a generation, and now moving into another second generation, there's been a transformation in terms of children's freedom to autonomously explore the world around them. The world around them has been changing, as you said. More densely built. More traffic. More crime. You know, a side of my work has been that. For 10 years, I coordinated the Growing up in Cities project for UNESCO, where we worked with children generally around 10 to 14 in low income communities around the world. And I was reviving a project that the urban planner and designer Kevin Lynch had created with UNESCO in the 1970s. So one generation later and already we could track between his work and the work we were doing. We started this in the mid 1990s. I coordinated it for 10 years. And now we have a local version of it that I helped create with others called Growing up Boulder, since we live in Boulder, Colorado. But we could already over that generation see, you know, that cities were more crime. And not just children's perception, that's certainly what data showed as well. And, of course, more traffic, and more ethnic tensions. And of course, in part that was because certainly in the United States, we had a whole system to keep people in their place. But, you know, by the mid 1990s, there was more immigration around the world. I mean, a new wave of immigration. We are a nation of immigrants, mostly. But new waves of immigration and the tensions created within communities. So we could really see those changes happening. And yes, and then screens, you know. TVs changed from a little gray thing when I was a child to all of their enticements. And on smartphones and computers and iPods and all kinds of screens. And so that's been a dramatic change, of course, in children's lives. Really dramatic. But on a personal note, what I need to say is that, you know, when I was a child playing up in the marsh, or in the old woodlot, or up in the woods, in the brook, I just assumed that was an eternal world. That the world of nature was eternal. And, of course, I hadn't taken any classes in ecology or evolutionary history yet. But that was just a feeling as a child. But, of course, we know it's not eternal. But when I was talking to a friend, the artist Patricia Johansson. Who works with water in the landscape. So very connected to the landscape. And she was saying the same thing, you know, out in the woods, it's just that this is an eternal place. And that was part of, I think, why it was magical, and comforting, as well. But her grandchildren don't have that perspective at all. So, on a personal note, I never expected I would be writing about and researching how to help young people cope with a very rapidly changing planet. Doherty: Yeah. Chawla: So that's been a personal trajectory for me.Pihkala: Thanks for sharing all that. And that brings us to the close connections between some of my research and your research. And I've greatly enjoyed your article from a couple of years back, called Childhood Nature Connection and Constructive Hope, with a subtitle A Review of Research on Connecting with Nature and Coping with Environmental Loss. And this latter part, as you hinted at now, that's been more rare in environmental education scholarship, for complex reasons I think. And I really appreciate this wide ranging review that you did, and which highlights the point that it's all based on caring and connection. Because we hurt where we care, as Thomas has a habit of saying. So both the empathy and the feelings of loss and grief and various fear and anxiety and worry -related feelings. They are related to the same fundamental point, but would you like to say something about these interconnections and that paper?Chawla: Yeah, well, where that paper comes from specifically is that I was part of a, actually a three year project with North American Association for Environmental Education was the Center for Children in Nature Network. A cluster of universities. To look at how connection to nature was being measured. And so I was there with Thomas Berry, who is in Sweden as a researcher. At that time, he was at the University of Minnesota. And we recognize that we have to make sure that measures for children are part of this effort. The goal was to produce a practitioners guide to assessing connection to nature, which is now freely available on the North American Association for Environmental Education website. But in the process of getting there we had all these different measures for, you know, mostly older children and adults. And as a group, we were reviewing them. We met in workshops. And to try to select the ones that would be really most accessible and useful for people in the environmental education field. And first, you know, Thomas and I noticed, there's very little here for younger children. So we made sure that early childhood measures are included in that. But in the process, yeah, I noticed these are all positive measures. I mean, the assumption is that connecting with nature is always a happy experience. And yet, I was aware, you know, I've been since the 1990s, I've been following studies that would ask children just really open ended questions like, what do you think the world will be like in 50? years? Or what do you think it'll be like in 100 years? Or what do you think you'll be like when you're raising your own children? And most of the responses from different countries, you know, just different interview approaches, drawing approaches. They were mostly dystopian. Like really dystopian. And dystopian, especially in terms of what was going to happen to the environment. And yet, you know, the children responding to these very open-ended questions were, certainly, in my view, expressing connection with the natural world too. That's why they were so upset. That's why they had such fearful imaginings for the future. And then I had a doctoral student Susie Stryfe, who did a study of the meaning of nature in the daily lives of children in a nearby city called Commerce City. Industrial city. Huge oil and gas refinery. And loads of warehouses. Idling trucks, et cetera. Gangs. A number of Superfund sites. And yet, nature was very important to them wherever they could find it. I mean, it might be an overgrown ditch. It might be the big, weedy overgrown corner of a, you know, basketball court. But it might be the strip of trees. But it was really important to them, where they found it. Where they could find it. And then simultaneously, she was doing all the same methods with children in a very economically upscale suburb of Denver, not far apart. They tend to think of nature as the exotic vacations we go on. To go as a family. But either way, she asked him this very open ended question, do you have any environmental concerns, and about 80% in both communities. It didn't matter which one. Had these, you know, expressed themselves in ways that hit me in the stomach. I mean, they said things like, I'm really sad because my grandson, or my great nephew is going to have to experience the end of the world. Or I'm really sad because all the animals are going to die. And, I mean, these really powerful statements to me. That was definitely part of their connection to nature. And so that's where I took these two literature reviews. Connection to nature. And all the good things it's about which it is and how it's being measured. And then this other research on children's fears and worries and sadness about what is happening to our planet. And brought them together to say, there's this, you know, difficult side of society of connecting to nature too. And, you know, given that one of the things that comes out of coping with environmental loss literature is the importance of opening in a space to feel you can freely express your emotions. In which I know has been a very important part of your work, Thomas and Panu. I see it's a very important part of your thinking about this as well. And, yet, my friend Maria Ojala who I brought over h…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights