TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Real Talk With Susan & Kristina

    Have you ever wished for a comprehensive guide to help navigate those challenging and uncomfortable moments in parenting? We’re Susan Stone and Kristina Supler—full-time moms and dedicated student attorneys at KJK. Our careers in student advocacy provide a unique perspective, but fundamentally, we’re two moms sharing the wisdom gathered from our experiences at home and in the courtroom.

    Our podcast delves into the essential aspects of parenting, covering a wide spectrum of topics. We dissect trends, examine case studies, and draw from expert opinions in each episode, aiming to equip you with insights on raising resilient kids in our constantly changing world.

    Please join us as we delve into some ‘Real Talk.’

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Overturning Roe v. Wade: Impact on College Students Aug 17, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Terry McGovern, Harriet and Robert H. Heilbrunn Professor and Chair of the Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health and the Director of the Program on Global Health Justice and Governance at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. They discuss the ramifications of the reversal of the Roe V. Wade Supreme Court decision on college campuses. The conversation includes the ripple effect of this controversial decision of SCOTUS on education, women's health and the economy, the possible legal considerations colleges need to be aware of and act on to accommodate the ruling, and what parents and college students can to adjust to the shifting context of abortion in the U.S. today. Show Notes: (01:07) A healthy discussion about the consequences of the recent reversal of the Supreme Court decision on Roe vs. Wade on college campuses (02:29) Making abortion illegal will not lessen its occurence; it will increase maternal death (03:22) How the criminalization of abortion further endangers women in college who are already at an elevated risk for sexual violence (03:54) Adding fear into an already costly medical procedure for women in college (05:17) The role religion plays in universities, the new abortion ban, and women's health (06:56) Why parents and female students need to reconsider their universities based on where they stand on the abortion verdict (08:32) Why Dobbs should not affect women's access to Plan B and other emergency contraception (09:57) How Dobbs will impact Title IX cases and its provisions (10:15) What colleges universities need to act on with regards to Title IX cases in light of the abortion ban and criminalization (10:54) Will colleges face criminal risk or exposure for aiding a student's travel to access abortion facilities (12:20) How the limitation of access to reproductive health has instilled a fear of risk of prosecution for colleges and its staff (15:44) The repercussions of the criminalization of abortion on women's health, likelihood of completing college altogether, the economy and what it means for the state (17:11) Why section 504 of Title IX cases, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act need to adjust accordingly to the elimination of the constitutional right to abortion (18:27) Terry's insights on the possibility of the reversal of the abortion ban in the future (20:52) Why a public health leader believes that the appropriate public response of universities about this ruling should favor bodily autonomy and the health outcome of their students (22:22) Ways in which students can campaign for women's health after the recent SCOTUS ruling on abortion (26:02) Sound advice parents should give their college kids about sex and possibilities of pregnancy before sending them off (26:45) Why parents need to consider the possibility of their sons causing a pregnancy in college as well (29:27) The extreme lengths women may possibly take because of the criminalization of abortion (31:20) The heartbreaking impact of this decision on the mental and physical health of children Transcript: Kristina Supler: We're so pleased today to be joined by Terry McGovern. Terry's the Harriet and Robert Heilbrunn professor and chair of the Heilbrunn department of population and family health at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. Since 2018, Terry served as director of the department's program on global health health justice and governance. And before joining, joining the mailman school in 1989, Terry founded the HIV law project and served as the executive director until 1999. While at the HIV law project, Terry litigated the groundbreaking case. S P V Sullivan, which led to the social security administration, including HIV-related disability in their criteria. Kristina Supler: She was appointed by President Bill Clinton to the national task force on aids, drug development, Terry, we're so pleased to have you join us today. Thank you. Susan Stone: Today's topic is how the recent United States Supreme court Dobbs decision, which reversed Roe V. Wade will impact students on college campuses. And Kristina we've really struggled about how to do this podcast. Because we want it to be a meaningful discussion that provides parents with information in a way that's helpful and shows some thought on our end. Susan Stone: And I know, you know, that I was in Italy, on my honeymoon and I couldn't get my mind off of. How to do this podcast? Who to have as a guest? And I feel so grateful for the guest that we're gonna have today. I know I reached out to her via email and I really thought about my words. I think I crafted that email, those three short paragraphs with as much thought as I would craft a legal brief. Susan Stone: And I'm so honored that she is here to talk about this topic. Susan Stone: And thank you for answering my email. Terry McGovern: Of course. Thank you for having me Susan Stone: Terry. First question. What is your reaction to the Dobs decision? And just, could you give our listeners who are mostly parents an explanation of how it will impact students on various college campuses? Terry McGovern: Sure. I have to say I was actually stunned. We know that making abortion illegal, doesn't actually reduce abortion. There's so much evidence globally of this. All it does is increase maternal mortality. So just from the point of view of wanting to end abortion, the way to do that, Is obviously to increase access to contraception and services. Terry McGovern: It's not to criminalize abortion. So from my perspective, this decision has really unleashed a whole lot of unnecessary harm on women and girls and people who can get pregnant. Of course in that category, we know that 57% of those who get abortions are women in their twenties. The latest data says 29% are college age students. Terry McGovern: So we also know that, college age women are at an elevated risk of sexual violence. We know that there's lots and lots of power issues. Negotiating sex. So for the women and girls who are in states, that abortion is now illegal and, and even criminalized this creates a very, very complicated set of decisions for them and a lot of complexity around everything having to do with a possible unintended pregnancy. Terry McGovern: So obviously just to state the obvious students often don't have access to cars. Their health insurance status is often dependent on parents. Many have jobs. There's a lot going on when you're in college. Before this decision accessing abortion was not easy. Right? So now you've injected into a very complicated situation, you know, a whole bunch of fear. Terry McGovern: And I think, I think the, uh, the issue of costs and how much it will cost to actually get an abortion, to travel, to get an abortion. All of these things are gonna be very, very difficult for students. I think. Kristina Supler: Susan and I, we represent students on campuses across the country. We deal with college students day in and day out. And we often start our conversations with parents, with the, the idea that look, every college campus has its own culture values. What flies on one campus? Doesn't done another, right. So it's fair to say at some schools, this decision might not have any impact on students and in other places might be absolutely monumental. Kristina Supler: I mean, do you agree with that? What would you say? Susan Stone: Especially with students at Columbia or Barnard? I don't think it's gonna be the same as students at Ohio state. Terry McGovern: Of course not, of course not. I mean, obviously, OB people just generally in acts in states that are making moves to protect access to abortion are in way better shape. Terry McGovern: Many of the colleges across the country actually even provide abortion medication, provide all kinds of services. It's the colleges in the states that have these extreme bands now where it's very scary. So for example, my son goes to college in Ohio. And the college that he goes to recently decided to contract with a religious provider. Terry McGovern: So there are huge questions about what services will be available, whether there will ever be any help for an abortion referral out of state. So it is extremely diff different depending upon where you are. one of the things post Dobbs is that people really do have to take a minute, figure out what the law is, where access is possible. Terry McGovern: You know, these are, these are very serious things to think about for parents, for your kids in schools, because you don't want to be scrambling. Susan Stone: Depending on where you stand on the issue. I'm thinking Terry about myself. I have a rising junior in high school. We're gonna start looking at colleges. Do you think that the Dobbs opinion will impact where students actually apply for college? Terry McGovern: I think for sure. I think for sure. I mean, I think it should, these are very, very serious issues. Honestly I have never written a letter to my child's college before. And I wrote immediately when I saw that they were going to contract with a, with a religious entity. Because I would have really extreme concerns about the safety of my child, in a place where they could not access any of these services. Terry McGovern: We're already seeing some polling of particularly girls who are thinking about crossing off the list schools that are in states that have total bans or, or criminalization provisions. Susan Stone: So it's gonna be even more difficult to get into Columbia. Or barnard . Terry McGovern: I mean, I, I think it's pretty difficult, but I suppose it could get more difficult. Terry McGovern: Yeah. It is really a very serious issue. If you're a girl Kristina Supler: there's just even more for families to consider and, and to really be thoughtful about when trying to find the right campus for. For the students, Susan, and I I'd like to turn to a different issue that touches on the do's opinion. Kristina Supler: We represent students across the country involved in campus title I proceedings. And we've had countless cases that in some way, shape or form involve economy that breaks in plan B maybe no condom and plan B plan B is, is in many, many of our cases. Do you think that Dobbs is going to impact the availability of plan b? Terry McGovern: It should not. Many of us feel like Dobbs has opened the door to questioning everything that has to do with contraception, emergency contraception. Nothing in the opinion actually would lead to that conclusion, but it has unleashed a kind of unfettered dedication to denying access to anything, having to do with, sexual and reproductive health services and particularly contraception morning after et cetera. Terry McGovern: The answer is mixed. Susan Stone: That's very interesting because what we're also wrestling with Terry, and maybe you can help us sort this through, as student advisors in the title IX process, we have dealt with situations where there have been unwanted pregnancies and abortions, and actually female complainants include the unwanted pregnancy as an aspect of a title IX violation that they didn't get consent to get pregnant as a different twist on consent. Susan Stone: We're wondering how will Dobs impact title IX? And do you think we're gonna see a rise of the unwanted pregnancy being a component of this type of complaint on college campuses. And even in those states where abortion is illegal and maybe more so in those states, Terry McGovern: Yeah. I mean, I think for sure, I mean the other issue isn't title IX only mandates excused absences for abortion and cases of medical necessity. Terry McGovern: So there are a whole lot of issues around title IX that have to be really thought about now. Given the, really this colleges should expand this definition of what is, a mandated excused absence. I do think for sure that you'll see more, we'll see more of these type cases. The other thing is that institutions should be establishing emergency funds, travel and care services. Terry McGovern: Just, there's a whole range of things, including looking at the title IX provisions and expanding them that I think colleges should be doing. But yes, of course. I think you'll see, you'll see more cases like that. Susan Stone: You know, Kristina, you're very involved with the NACDL, which is one of our country's best associations for criminal defense lawyers. Susan Stone: If a college facilitates a fund to allow for travel. Do you think there's any criminal risk or exposure? Kristina Supler: That's a really good question. And a question that many of my brilliant , Susan Stone: that's what I asked you, partner. Kristina Supler: My brilliant colleagues are wrestling with right now and obviously I'm sort of chuckling, but I shouldn't because it's a really serious question that some of the most brilliant people in our country are wrestling with in terms of setting policy and procedures for institutions on how to service the needs of students. And without getting too into legalese and boring stuff, the people who aren't lawyers probably wouldn't care about the it's a super complicated issue. Kristina Supler: Colleges and universities have legal obligations to help students and accommodate students for various issues. But yet there's also criminal implications and confidentiality issues and stuff like the crime fraud, exception, and, and there's all these sorts of like very academic issues that lawyers and administrators are, are wrestling with now. Kristina Supler: And I'm curious, Terry, what are your thoughts? What are the conversations at Columbia? Susan Stone: Because you could be a well-intentioned administrator, but say. I have my own family and I have an obligation to follow the law. I don't wanna unwittingly put myself at risk of being prosecuted. Kristina Supler: Well, and we know so many students look up to their professors or have very close relationships there and there's trust. Kristina Supler: So, I mean, Terry, what are your thoughts? . Terry McGovern: First of all, there's some other simple things like exclusionary housing policies that we're gonna see more pregnant college students. There's that issue? Just a simple one, but I think we are in kind of a crazy time in terms of what is legal and what is not mm-hmm as you just articulated. Terry McGovern: Nobody knows. I feel the opponents of access to abortion or, and, and the range of reproductive health services are trying everything they can to criminalize those who do anything to protect access. So I wouldn't ever, de-legitimize the fears of administrators at institutions. On the other hand, we can't just give in to this kind of mentality. I mean, these are healthcare services. These are young people who are extremely vulnerable. I think what's happening is people are getting together. Experts are getting together and are giving their best judgment about risk of prosecution, but there is always gonna be some risk here. Terry McGovern: There's risk that they may be sued. There's risk, but they probably won't win. I say that crossing both fingers. Mm-hmm because as we know, we're looking at Oklahoma, uh, South Dakota and Wisconsin and it's a county by county. You have to look at who the prosecutors are, who the judges are, who elected them. Terry McGovern: So it's really complicated to predict whether something will be found to be illegal or in violation of a bounty law pro provision o…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Protect Your Child's Academic Future with a Social Media Audit Aug 03, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Randy Rohde, the founder of 38 Digital Market. They discuss social media and how it has emerged to have a prevalent influence in the lives of college students and post-college. The conversation includes proper social media etiquette that both parents and their children need to follow, how to traverse social media mishaps and using social media to your child's advantage. Links: KJK Student Defense Show Notes: (01:39) Addressing online harassment and its ramifications: How the pandemic spurred about an entirely new service for their law firm (04:04) An essential summer activity parents should require their children to do: audit their social media (05:10) Playing detective: Why every parent needs to be vigilant in an ever-changing landscape that is social media (06:16) Why there's no such thing as privacy in the digital age and parents need to act within the parameters of their control (09:16) What both parents and children should be proactive about to avoid their college plans from becoming derailed (10:32) Social media and college applications: how to tip the scale in your child's behavior (11:28) Why you social media followers can be your worst enemy during college application (13:19) How publishing your views on certain topics and issues on social media can have dire consequences (16:19) Warning: Objects in pictures can be more incriminating than they appear. (17:19) Taboo photos and videos that no child should ever take in the first place (18:51) Why sending nudes can send you to jail (21:39) Approaches parents can utilize to initiate the conversation about the dangers of taking and engaging with nude photos (24:00) The first amendment and how it works in public and private schools (26:32) Why parents need to have real conversations with their children about the code of conduct and school policies (28:39) What would my employer think? Why students as well as adults need to consider their careers when publishing anything online (29:38) Easy Rule of Thumb When Knowing What Not to Post (32:21) Maximizing social media to your child's or your own advantage (34:30) How to properly address and rectify social media mishaps Transcript: Randy Rohde: Hi, this is Randy Rohde. Really excited to join Kristina and Susan, once again on Real Talk Conversations and Susan Stone, Kristina Supler from K J K Student and Athlete Defense. And today's show we're gonna really hit on a conversation topic I think is, uh, very timely, very important, especially in today's environment. Randy Rohde: We're gonna talk about social media and the impact that social media has on so many aspects of our lives, but specifically college students and post-college what that means. But before we start going down that avenue. Because this subject actually falls into this particular practice of your law firm reputation management. Randy Rohde: Both of you are highly experienced reputation management attorneys. Can you explain, first of all, what is that? What does that mean? Reputation management. And why did you decide that you wanted to pursue and offer that as a service in the area of law that you practice. Susan Stone: Hi, Randy. It's always awesome being with you because you ask the best questions. Susan Stone: I would say this aspect of being reputation management attorneys found Kristina and me. Ah, we were in the middle of the pandemic and everybody was glued to their computers. Kristina Supler: And phones Susan Stone: and phones and kids, obviously they weren't going to school. They weren't playing sports. They weren't outside. They were living and breathing on their social media. Susan Stone: And all of a sudden we had a couple student discipline cases, especially with younger students where students would say, uh, make comments on their social media that were deemed threatening or racist. Or homophobic or anti harassing in some way. Yep. Harassing. And we had to deal with those discipline cases. Susan Stone: And at the same time we had people hiring us because their college acceptances were revoked because students were reporting to the college that a student was supposed to attend about some offensive social media and colleges were sending letters out saying. Sorry, not sorry. You are not welcome here in the fall. Susan Stone: From that Kristina and I went , we've gotta deal with this. And so from there, that aspect of our business was born. Kristina Supler: It it's been interesting, Randy, the way it's taken off also, I mean, We get calls from all over the country to help individuals to just wind up in, in sticky situations, let's say because of unintentional, inadvertent, sometimes intentional and calculated comments and actions taken online. Kristina Supler: And it's really remarkable. The ripple effect, one act in connection with social media the bigger implications. Randy Rohde: You work with so many different age groups, but in your particular practice in working with title IX cases, both. So students, parents, professors, faculty members I guess right now, this particular kind of time of the year in the middle of summer here we are lot of different things, but it probably doesn't matter what time of the year it is, but. Randy Rohde: When we're thinking about social media right now, and we're thinking about students and we're saying, Hey, this could be a good time to clean up social media. Do students need to be mindful of this and what they post and how they post this information? Susan Stone: So summer is the perfect time for parents to require their students to conduct a social media audit. Susan Stone: We think woo it's summer, we can say, or do what we want on our phones and in our social media. But that couldn't be further than the truth because that's when people have more time to pay attention to other people. And what might be offensive to other people's social media early on in our practice, we did a whole podcast on cancel culture. Susan Stone: And I think that cancel culture occurs in the summer more than any other time, because people are not busy with homework exams, extracurricular activities. So now that everybody's a little bit more relaxed and I say, Have more time on their hands. It's a good time to, for parents to say, I wanna see what's on your Instagram. Susan Stone: I wanna see what's on your TikTok and Kristina, wouldn't you say every year we learned about a different chat room, a different app that we didn't know existed, where people are talking, Kristina Supler: oh, it's amazing. The way the social media platforms evolve and expand and come in and out of popularity. Kristina Supler: You know, we tell parents of course, You must, must, must, must conduct a social media audit with your child, clean up the social media, but also be mindful of, you know, you gotta do a little bit of sleuthing because there's the fake accounts, the accounts they don't necessarily admit to you that they have. Kristina Supler: And it's important to just poke around and know is it Instagram? Is it TikTok? Is it various chat rooms on discord. I mean, you name it Twitter. It, it's interesting to see the certain types of speech sometimes in, in groups that form on different platforms. And so just cuz you have one child that might be really active on Instagram, let's say another child might be more in the online chat rooms or TikTok. Randy Rohde: Go ahead, Susan, were you? Susan Stone: Yeah, I wanna add to this, that the social media audit is what's within the control of the parent. We had a really interesting case came in, was it a couple years ago, Kristina? About the one where the kid was with a group of friends feeling like. They were in a safe space, not knowing that some really offensive comments. Susan Stone: Do you remember that? Kristina Supler: I do. And that, gosh, that was a heartbreaking case for so many reasons. But, I think the, the long and short of it is, is. Students and adults, it's actually a lesson for grownups as well. You never know when and how you're being recorded. And then ultimately how that content will be distributed. Susan Stone: Yeah, let's backtrack. So our listeners can gain some insight in this story. There was a situation where a bunch of friends were having a sleepover, very normal, correct. You know, That's what students do. That's what happened. And, uh, one student was making comments that was really meant for the friends who were there at this party, who I believe they thought they were with their besties, their BFFs, as they would call 'em. And not understanding that everything was being captured on a phone. Susan Stone: And later what was said was transmitted and it did lead to student discipline. It did, did lead to ostracization from other peers and it had a ripple effect. and it was sad because while the student should not have been making certain comments, we could debate that. Okay. But we've all behind closed doors when we were with people, maybe our spouse, maybe your boyfriend, maybe your girlfriend, maybe what you think is your best friend. Say things that are not meant for the public. Susan Stone: Well, look, well, I I'd like to say today nothing is private. So parents do the social media O audit, but you also have to say, is there anything else that was captured that you think you know about that we have to deal with? Susan Stone: Do we need to reach out to certain parents and say, Hey, can you have your student remove this from their phone? And you may not, that's beyond your control, but you have to try. Randy Rohde: Hmm. Hmm. That's really great advice. I think a lot of times as a parent myself, I don't think as much about, Hey, can I go and talk to other parents about, and can you do a looksie and see what was communicated or shared amongst friends of my kids. Randy Rohde: So you mentioned about a podcast that you had previously and another one that kind of pops up for me is one just a few episodes ago, actually about navigating college applications. Is this something meaning social media use and posts? Is this something that colleges are paying attention to now in their, I guess, selection processes? Randy Rohde: Have you seen this pop up more and more? Kristina Supler: Oh, I'm so glad you're asking that question, Randy. Because the answer is yes. And parents and students should understand that and be aware. We are seeing it with growing frequency where schools, high schools and colleges rescind acceptances, or maybe don't offer admission because private school, private high schools to clarify. Kristina Supler: Yeah. Thank you. Important points. Because of contents that the student has posted online. It happens more often than one would think. And sometimes we've seen colleges, rescind acceptance just a few weeks before the school year's supposed to start. And know, if you think about what's going on in a household, the excitement leading up to your child, going off to college freshman year it's such an exciting time. Kristina Supler: It's a nerve-wracking time because there it's such a change. It's a transition time. And then to have the rug pulled out from under the students, so to speak at the final hour because of again, social media postings likes whatever. It's devastating to the student. It causes a lot of turmoil. Kristina Supler: Decisions need to be made fast. Plans changed. And it really can jeopardize the student's future. Susan Stone: I also wanna refer back to that podcast. It was a great PCA. We spoke to DaVita AMR about the fact that colleges are going test optional. And should you take the SAT? Should you take the ACT look, it's getting really competitive and it's always been competitive to get into college. Susan Stone: The last thing a student needs when building an acceptance is. A horrible blight on their record. Mm-hmm because all things are equal. You have two 35s on an ACT, you have two captains of whatever sports teams. Both students have great grades. College admissions officers do look at social media. Susan Stone: And if there's social media, that is not, appropriate. Well, who do you think they're gonna take? Kristina Supler: And I just wanna clarify or add, add to Susan's point. I, I don't at all have the sense that it's these college admissions officers who are pseudo detectives, trolling the internet to get the aha. Kristina Supler: Gotcha. We don't want you it's to Susan's point. It's so competitive now. You have so many talented students out there. And so when all things are equal, what might tip the scale slightly in favor of one student or another, it might be social media, a and something else that we've encountered isn't even the college admissions office. Kristina Supler: Actively searching the student's social media, but rather Susan, do you remember that other case where it was ideal high school classmates who were tweeting at a college regarding an incoming student saying, basically take a look at this, take a look at this. You should be aware of this student and there. Kristina Supler: Really significant fallouts that unfolded. And that was because other students put the issue on the radar of the admissions office. Susan Stone: It's so easy to flag colleges today. It's a tweet. Randy Rohde: Yeah. Yeah. It's so amazing. That is an amazing an astounding example that you gave because I was going through all different kinds of scenarios, who, who in a col in what college has any kinda manpower to like sit and stream through thousands of students, social media profiles. Right. It's crazy because there's these private groups, discord, telegram, all of this stuff that parents may not even be aware of, I'm thinking, but. The example that you gave is absolutely it's the people who the students may know or have they have access to that can send out. Because accessibility is so, easy in today's world through social media that, yeah, I, Susan Stone: yeah, Randy, I really lean towards parents telling their kids to be very cautious about what they post. Yeah. Not to give you a war, another war story, because war stories can get so boring. And I know that lawyers love to give war stories, but we do remember that case that dealt with a student who thought that she was actually providing positive social media and it was completely perceived by the reader as being insensitive and perhaps even racist. Susan Stone: So. You know, be cautious when you're telling your student, if you're gonna take a position and there's a lot of issues out there today to take a position that your message is going to be received in the way you intend the message. Randy Rohde: Hmm. That, uh, well, that's always a good life lesson, regardless whether on social media or not on social, um, So I you've seen a lot of different things. Randy Rohde: What are, is there a list in your mind, like of common issues that you may find. Susan Stone: Well, we're gonna give you a list and go back and forth on what you Kristina Supler: think is important. Good. So something that comes to mind immediately be careful what you like a like is construed as an endorsement of a certain idea or concept. Kristina Supler: So thinking that something is funny, isn't. And liking something because, oh, it's funny. Not so to other readers in the audience, they might think that what you've liked are your own personal beliefs. Parents really need to talk to their kids about that. Susan Stone: Be careful what you share and how you spread o…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    What College Women Need to Know About Sexual Health and STI's Jul 20, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Lauren Streicher, a Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Northwestern University's medical school, and the founder and medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Menopause and the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Health. They discuss sexual and reproductive health in college kids. The conversation includes prevention, infection and maintenance of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI's), the myths behind contraceptives and how they actually benefit women, and how to empower women with education about sex, reproductive and gynecological health, and sexual pleasure. Links: Dr Lauren Streicher's Website (Click here) Inside Information: the Menopause Podcast (Click here) Show Notes: (00:38) How we crossed paths with Dr. Streicher and her amazing accomplishments to date (02:01) The irony between hot flashes and college (02:46) The surge of sexually transmitted diseases and infections…a.k.a. College (03:31) What measure should every mom and their child take to prevent contraction of STI's known to cause certain types of cancer? (06:11) A scary new trend of how college students have fallen victim to STI's (07:19) How this makeshift form of protection that is often ridiculed can allow women to safely enjoy oral sex…well for 15 seconds (08:10) Unraveling the mysteries of a female condom– yes, you read that correctly. (09:10) Saran wrap belongs in the kitchen, not on your lady parts (09:52) The real solution to safe oral sex for women (that's FDA-approved) (11:50) How $6 can save you from a potentially life-long sexually transmitted infection (12:34) Why not all sexually transmitted infections can be treated with just creams or at all (13:28) The best safety measure you can take to prevent a permanent battle with HPV (13:40) Unfortunately, there is no catch-all screening test for sexually transmitted diseases (15:37) Common misconceptions about emergency contraception (17:31) The scientific explanation of pregnancy and fertilization (18:40) A non-pill form of emergency contraception (19:10) The ancient alternative to Plan B pills (19:50) An over-the-counter, essential component of your child's college first-aid kit (21:14) News flash: You can still get pregnant after taking Plan B (21:42) Alternative forms of contraception with higher efficacies (22:36) The dwindling existence of access to safe abortions for unplanned pregnancies; 50% from failed contraception (23:52) A lesser known benefit of IUDs (24:20) Busting the myth that contraceptives like birth control pills lead to infertility in women; they actually protect it (25:44) The effect of marijuana on reproductive health in both men and women (26:52) Why in the end, money matters more than health; the explanation behind the lack of scientific studies on the effects of marijuana to a female's reproductive health (27:53) What is the most prevalent gynecological health issue facing women in their early twenties today? (28:20) An online resource young women can utilize for sex education and pleasure; basically everything our mothers didn't talk to us about (29:08) Female sexual pleasure and why it should not be overlooked (31:30) Sex should never hurt period. (34:56) The sex talk that every mother should have with their daughter before sending them off to college Kristina Supler: Today we are so pleased to be joined by Dr. Lauren Streicher. Who's a clinical professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University's Medical School. Dr. Streicher's also the medical director of the Northwestern Medicine Center for Menopause and the Northwestern Medicine Center for Sexual Medicine. Susan Stone: I just have to say, we are really excited. We worked with Dr. Streicher on a case where she gave us some gynecological expertise. There was an issue and we got to know her and it's an amazing colleague to have. She just released a book. Her recent books are Slip, Sliding Away, Turning Back the Clock on Your Vagina and Hot Flash Hell, a Gynecological Guide to Turning Down the Heat. Susan Stone: And as a woman in her fifties, I can tell you that's important. But she's also an expert on issues that would pertain to women in college, which is why we actually met her. Kristina Supler: Yeah. It's been such a pleasure to Work with Dr. Streicher and review all of her books and her social media content. I should mention she's also the host of a podcast called Dr. Streicher's Inside Information, the Menopause Podcast. So for all of our listeners out there, parents who are listening to learn about what to talk to their college kids about. Check out Dr. Streicher's podcast as well. Susan Stone: we get a double bang for our buck because typically our podcast is for our listeners of kids in college. Susan Stone: So if you think about it, Dr. Streicher, we're here to talk about health of college kids, but our listeners are their mothers who should turn onto your podcast. So welcome a board to Real Talk. Dr. Lauren Streicher: Well, thank you. And, and of course your listeners are my listeners because isn't it just kind of strange how, when women have their first hot flash is also the time they're waving goodbye to their kid and redecorating their bedroom. Dr. Lauren Streicher: So true. because women, as you know, tend to put off having kids, and it is not unusual for a woman to have a family starting in her mid, late thirties, which means hot flashes in college. It's all goes together. That is Susan Stone: the great tie in. Why don't we lead off with our first question that would really impact women going off to college. Susan Stone: What's new in the world of preventing diseases, anything new in that area? Dr. Lauren Streicher: It's funny, you should ask, sexually transmitted infections is of course a big topic, which that issue starts long before someone goes off to college, you know, certainly in high school we addressing those issues, but there's no question that the numbers of sexually transmitted infections do go up in the twenties during the college years, because that's the time when young men and young women are exploring sexuality. Dr. Lauren Streicher: Very often having multiple partners and quite frankly, very often having too much to drink too often, which can sometimes lead to sexual activities that even people who have the best of intentions find that maybe they don't use the condom. They don't use the protection, they don't need. Do what they need to do. Dr. Lauren Streicher: So it is a time that stories going a day out well, Susan Stone: and that's why we have a business. Right? Dr. Lauren Streicher: So let me start why it talks about what's new in terms of sexually transmitted infection prevention. This isn't exactly new, but it bears repeating for parents that before you pack your kid off for college, make sure they have their HPV vaccine. Dr. Lauren Streicher: And we are talking both boys and girls, you know, a lot of people, they put it. For a variety of reasons when their kids are 11 or 12, it's kind of on the back burner. Maybe the pediatrician doesn't bring it up. Maybe they don't see a pediatrician anymore. And this is critically important because what we know is that if a woman gets the HPV vaccine, that she's going to be protected against 90% of strains of human papillomavirus. Dr. Lauren Streicher: Which of course are not only responsible for cervical cancer, but also vaginal cancers V our cancers, some head and neck cancers and the thing is, and also, yeah, and, and we have data coming out now because it's been around long enough that we're starting to see the fruit of that vaccine because it used to just be okay. Dr. Lauren Streicher: We have less girls with abnormal. Pap tests, but now we are seeing people, we're now 15 years later seeing less cervical cancers, less other cancers. And this is just as important for the boys as the girls. You know, a lot of times I'll get a parent who says, well, you know, that encourages sexual activity. Dr. Lauren Streicher: We know that it does not encourage sexual activity. And for the parents who say, my kid is not gonna be sexually active, you can think that, and, and maybe your kid won't be, but as you know, better than anybody, the rates of non-consensual sex are very high in, at college. And just like you wouldn't set your kid off to drive without putting on their seatbelt. Dr. Lauren Streicher: You shouldn't send them off without their HPV vaccine. So. For starters, even if you don't wanna have the conversation with your kid about it they need that HPV vaccine. It is critically important and it is FDA approved, of course, for both boys and girls, up to the age of 45, by the way, moms, for those of you who are single out there, and as you send your kid off, you're saying, okay, now it's my time. Dr. Lauren Streicher: Keep in mind that as you get out there, you wanna protect yourself as well. While it is not FDA approved for women over the age of 45. I give an HPV vaccine to any woman who asks I don't care how old she is because older guys have HPV too thought. I would just throw that in, even though it's a little bit, Hey, off Susan Stone: topic, protect those moms out there. Susan Stone: Protect single mom. Dr. Lauren Streicher: Well, truly when we think about this being a time of sexuality for your young adult, for a lot of people, especially single moms, this is the time that you say, okay, my turn, or even the people who are married or in long-term relationships, suddenly you're not worrying about the, the teenager lurking outside the door and sure. Dr. Lauren Streicher: They actually have a little bit more activity. But the thing that's new, that's really interesting. While anyone, any college student you talk to is certainly aware that condoms, um, will protect against sexually transmitted infections during intercourse. We know that there are a lot of sexual activities that have nothing to do with the penis going and the vagina. Dr. Lauren Streicher: And in fact, there are a lot of people that will avoid. Penile vaginal penetration specifically because they are worried about pregnancy or they are worried about an STI. So they'll do other things. And a lot of times what other things might involve is oral sex. So the problem of course, has always been, if you have a woman who is on the receiving end, Of getting oral sex from a male or female partner. Dr. Lauren Streicher: There's always the concern about the trans the genital oral transmission of sexually transmitted infections. And we're talking things like human papilloma, virus, herpes Even gonorrhea, even syphilis, you can transmit a lot through genital oral contact and you don't want to end up with an infection like that. Dr. Lauren Streicher: So what options does a young woman have to protect herself and to protect her partner? In the past, a woman was always told to use a dental dam. Now, now you have you ever. Seen a dental dam outside of your dental office. I Kristina Supler: never one had to try and mention it. Dr. Lauren Streicher: No, it's like, no, of course not. They're not gonna buy it. Dr. Lauren Streicher: They're not going use it. They, everyone hears about it and jokes about it's not gonna happen. So what's the alternative to the dental dam. Well, for the Martha Stewarts out there what you can do is you can take an UN lubricated condom. You can cut off the tip, you can cut open the condom, and now you've got a square of latex, which is gonna be impermeable. Dr. Lauren Streicher: So theoretically. For the highly motivated, you can then teach which work and spread it over the vulva. And it's never gonna happen. That's gonna last for about maybe 15 seconds before it falls off or gets pushed aside or whatever. So that's really not a solution. And then we have the female condom, which a lot of people haven't heard of. Dr. Lauren Streicher: And the female condom is basically an over the counter product, just like a male condom. Only this one goes inside the woman's vagina. And then there's a sheath, basically a tube with the ring at the end that goes outside on the VVA. And I know you're making a face. People can't see that, but I will tell everybody you're making a face and that's exactly. Susan Stone: I am you making a face going, does that cause up an infection? Dr. Lauren Streicher: Well, I affection, but the face you're making is the same face young women make when I tell them about it, because they say, are you kidding? First of all, I'm not gonna, you know, find buy one of these things. I'm not gonna put it inside me. I'm not gonna hang it out, have it hanging out on my vagina, just to have the guys say, what's that. Dr. Lauren Streicher: So that's not gonna happen. And before we get onto what the real solution is, I also wanna mention that saran wrap is also not. An option. A lot of people, I know this is what's good. I mean, this is what's going on out. There is people are saying, okay, I don't wear nowhere to get a dental dam. They don't know about the condom thing and they saran wrap. Dr. Lauren Streicher: I've got it in my kitchen. It's easy. I'll grab it. So they take saran wrap, they spread it over their Volvo, but here's the problem. Wrap is made to go in microwaves. And what that means is it's porous. Hello? Hey, there's a little ports of entry for all those bugs. You're trying to keep out. So aside from the fact that it's very amusing, when you go to the store and you see a woman buying jumbo cran wrap, and you think, gee, I wonder what that's for. Dr. Lauren Streicher: It is not to prevent sexually transmitted infections. I have good news. What's the solution. The solution is there is a new product, actually, not a new product, but what's new is that the FDA has just sanctioned. It is actually protecting against sexually transmitted infections. And this product is a panty. Dr. Lauren Streicher: It is called Loral L O R a L. I do not work for these people. And basically what Loral is, is it was invented for the purpose of preventing sexually transmitted infections when a woman is receiving oral sex so that she doesn't give it to the giver who you're always grateful to the giver. You don't wanna give them something, right. Dr. Lauren Streicher: And you're not gonna get anything from the giver. So the way that this works is that these panties are made out of the same material as condoms. It's a latex panty, and they're kind of cute. They come in, very stretchy bikini style. It's, you know, you won't feel stupid wearing it cuz they actually are cute panties. Dr. Lauren Streicher: And the idea is that the. where is this panty? And it's very, very thin so that if someone is giving her oral sex, she still gets all the sensation. She can feel everything he or she who's giving can feel everything. But if there's anything lurking on her genitals or on the giver's tongue, it's not gonna get transmitted. Dr. Lauren Streicher: The panties are not looking. Not that Susan Stone: we're Googling it everybody. And we see that it's, we're not getting paid either. I just learned about this. Kristina Supler: Wow. Oh, look at this. We think it's about damn time undies were designed for pleasure of the, the pleasure of their wearer Susan Stone: and it's $25 and vanilla scented and it's seamless. Susan Stone: So it's not gonna super stretch…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Real Talk Conversations: Who We Are Jul 06, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Randy Rohde, the founder of 38 Digital Market. They discuss what it's been like to run a law practice as partners. The conversation includes how their diverse skill set and respective approaches has created a strong foundation for their powerful partnership, how they challenged traditional law firm practices with their unique approach to business and the services they provide and the fundamental elements of being an effective lawyer and having a successful practice. Show Notes: (00:55) How strengthening their business relationship has significantly impacted their ability to help students and their families with legal matters (02:36) Achieving growth and development through constructive conflict (03:38) Maintaining professionalism with mutual respect and trust in one another (04:29) How Title IX sparked the beginning of their business partnership and mission to help students and their families (06:21) The controversy of breaking law firm industry norms by equally sharing origination credits of their business (07:52) The beauty of applying a growth mindset to a complementary skill set (09:44) Title IX and research misconduct cases, and how their archetypal clientele has evolved throughout the years and pandemic. (12:10) Going beyond legal consultation with parental counseling for clients and how it's helped their personal development (16:29) Why listening skills and establishing boundaries are rudimentary to becoming a successful lawyer for your clients (17:47) How the dynamics of their partnership in every case has proved to be advantageous for their clients time and again (23:03) The perfect time to hire a lawyer that yields the best possible outcome regardless of the type of case Transcript: Kristina Supler: Today, we're doing real talk conversations. We're joined by Randy Rohde of 38 Digital Market. Susan Stone: You mean we're talking to each other. With Randy. Hi, Randy. yes. Randy Rohde: Yes. You're talking to each other and I'm just kind of here along for the ride a little bit. So, thank you for inviting me and having me part of the team here today. Randy Rohde: It really is an honor and you. Folks have done really some remarkable things. I think in what you do in your practice. I would love to hear a lot of that, but maybe to start as first. How about some background on the two of you? Susan Stone: Thanks. It's so funny. You take for granted what you have every day in your life. And Kristine and I are really lucky that we formed this team to represent students and families with legal needs with regard to their education or some other crisis. And we take a team approach in every aspect of what we do, whether it's building our business or serving our clients. Kristina Supler: What's always so interesting to me. And, and, and I know Susan shares the same perspective. People have this perception of us that we have this wonderful team and business we've built and a friendship as well, because we're as close outta the office as we appear to be in the office. But it's not something that's just always been there. I mean, over the years, we've really worked hard to get to know each other and figure out our likes, our interests our pain points, our weaknesses, and figure out how to grow with each other and really build a business together into what we both enjoy in a business that taps into not only helping people, but also that brings us fulfillment. Susan Stone: I think that was really nicely put. Yeah. Randy Rohde: Yeah. And I know from past conversations with the two of you that you also highly, I will say compliment each other on the differences of your either specialties or the way that you just were maybe better put to say your personalities and it enables you, I think maybe when you mix it all together, it's like an incredible team. Susan Stone: Well, you know, I do wanna say that we were a lot more different 10 years ago. Kristina Supler: Absolutely speaking for myself, a vastly different person, really. Susan Stone: And we were different generations. We had different career goals and as time went on and really working through things, I would say now we're like an old, married couple in many ways where we can complete each other's sentences. But it's the differences that make us more powerful and in many ways. Susan Stone: And sometimes I miss that time where it was so vastly different. Of course there's less clash, there's less conflict, but sometimes the growth was in the conflict. Kristina Supler: Yeah. I would say that through really what has enabled us to achieve the success that we've reached and service our clients to the best of our ability is wrestling with each other and sitting in discomfort and having disagreements and talking things through and, and sometimes arguing through points to really arrive at The best result for our clients. Kristina Supler: But I think in order to do that professionally, there has to be a tremendous amount of respect for each other, and then also trust and a feeling of, of safety with each other to be, to feel confident, but then also to feel vulnerable and say, To oneself it's okay to be wrong. Like, I don't have to have an ego here. Kristina Supler: Susan's right. And I'm wrong. Or, or vice versa or, often it's even young associates that we're working with where we stop and pause and say, gee, huh? Hadn't thought of that. You're right. Randy Rohde: Hmm. As the practice has grown. And maybe before I even approach that, so your practice is focused on Student in athlete defense, specifically title IX. Randy Rohde: Why don't you give us a little bit of background about title IX and how that has, I think matured as a law over the course of years. Susan Stone: Gosh, I mean, it started in 1972 and it is the statute that ensures that all students have equal access to their education and extracurricular activities. Really, I think the first application was making sure that there were equal opportunities in the field of athletics for both genders. Susan Stone: Now the primary application is to make sure that students are attend college free from discrimination or sexual harassment or sexual assault. I would say that it is a large part of our practice, but by no means. The only focus of our practice. We do a lot more than that. Kristina Supler: What's interesting about title IX on, on a personal level, is that it's actually what in many ways brought Susan and me together. Kristina Supler: So for years, Susan we were at the same law firm together and Susan was doing education work and civil litigation employment work. And, and I was essentially doing criminal defense exclusively. And. As the government put out directives to your colleague letters, really instructing educational institutions on how to implement title IX on college campuses, organically, Susan. Kristina Supler: And I just noticed we're both starting to get these calls from people, with kids at school. There's this problem? What do we do? And over time there was. Significant overlap in the work we were doing. And we started to work together increasingly and realized we enjoyed working with each other. Kristina Supler: And it just sort of, there was that moment where you pause and think gee, is there something really awesome happening right under my nose. And I need to like open my eyes and seize the moment. And it was really to Susan's credit that we ended up, in, in a situation where we said, you know, let's conscientiously and consciously build this female partnership together. Susan Stone: And I, I do think one of the things we did, which was at the time really shocking for people is we basically said, let's build this and. It's whatever comes in, we'll split the source. You know, law firms are businesses. Kristina Supler: I would say just for a, a little bit of background for those who aren't familiar with the ins and outs of law firms, the idea of origination I is, is everything. Kristina Supler: So, the lawyer bringing in the clients gets the origination credit, different firms, call it D. Different labels. Right. But that is a very important part of, of becoming a partner and, and growing in the firm. And so this idea that two lawyers would split origination credits, regardless of whose contact, brought the matter to the firm. Kristina Supler: We were met with a ton of resistance and, and many of what comments? Yeah. Susan Stone: Like why would you do Kristina Supler: this? I think ultimately at the root of it was concern that like we were sort of bucking the system and like, what if other people catch on and like other lawyers start doing this, then what's gonna happen to this whole system. Kristina Supler: That's premised essentially. Competition with one another. Randy Rohde: That's funny because that's what exactly what I was going like. Wow. Have you started a new trend, even at your firm at K JK or, in the industry as a whole? Susan Stone: Well, the interesting thing, I don't know if we started a trend and we, we really very lucky to be at K JK, but what I would say is at the time I had already started this practice. Susan Stone: Mm. And. Was very fortunate. I started my practice representing students. With needs in special education, K through 12 to make sure the individual education plan or the 5 0 4 plan was really providing a, a free, appropriate public education. And then I was starting to get the title IX cases in and cheating cases and other types of student discipline, both at the K through 12 and the college level. Susan Stone: I still have the diploma of a graduate student hanging on my wall. First case I won and I had a marketing background and I remember someone commenting. Why would you wanna your, your head in, in starting a business? And I knew that that was just the beginning of a journey and that Christina's skillset is being now. Susan Stone: Outstanding lawyer, not just an outstanding criminal defense lawyer, but really an outstanding PR practitioner and the fact that she's so detail oriented and she has such a passion for her clients. I would not grow without that skillset. So you let go a little and you get a lot more mm-hmm Kristina Supler: that growth mindset is something that we've really made a point to, to guide our decisions over the. Randy Rohde: I like that. Even as she was saying that folks, you can't see this because we're on audio, but you know, they're pointing. Yes, that was right. I love that. So as your practice has changed and matured as the law has changed and become different, I think over the course of the years, N now, and you alluded to some of this already, but maybe talk about some of the typical. Randy Rohde: Cases or types of cases that you take on now in your practice, what does that look like? Susan Stone: Obviously title IX cases, which are allegations of sexual assault, sexual misconduct, stalking sexual harassment. I think what has changed is that originally we were really only representing the accused, which were mostly male, however, We are finding more and more females are hiring attorneys. Susan Stone: Wouldn't you say, Christina? Kristina Supler: I agree. It's been. Over the years, the, the clients who have been hiring us have it's been interesting to see the path that's taken and that we're being hired. Now we represent many female complainants who are going through the process and recognize that they'd like to be served by a student advisor. Kristina Supler: Who's a lawyer. We also represent students in high school and grade school who are, are facing. Title IX matters, but it doesn't stop there. Our practice is nationwide and so we're representing individuals across the country who are facing different types of matters that Susan mentioned, student misconduct academic integrity cases, hazing. Kristina Supler: Criminal cases. We actually do quite a bit of work in the field known as research misconduct. And so in that realm, it's actually quite different from what we do in the title IX realm, but there's the same sort of legal approaches that guide the work academic integrity, academic research misconduct matters were representing. Kristina Supler: Researchers professors who often have grants, often federal grants used to fund research in labs, and there's been allegations of fabrication, falsification, plagiarism. And so there's a whole process, both. Internally and institutions, but also then externally at times with the federal government. And those are really interesting Susan Stone: cases. Susan Stone: I have to say, Randy, a couple weeks ago, a new case came in and it's already concluded. We're waiting to hear the outcome of some college kids who got drunk and allegedly beat on a mascot at a professional game. I mean, who beats the mascot at, drunk kids? I smiled. I was so grateful for that case because those are the cases you wanna see college kids get into, just little drunken shenanigans, I guess. Susan Stone: It's not that funny to the mascot, but since the pandemic, the cases we're seeing are just so serious and heavy and. I wanna step out that I think what Christina and I do is so much more than just being lawyers. We counsel both students and parents. Kristina Supler: So we such an important part of what we do is Susan Stone: working with parents. Susan Stone: And oftentimes we're really giving difficult advice to parents on not only the. Of their child's case, but they don't know how to manage their kids. And we've dealt with a lot of mental health issues. We refer students out for therapy or coaching, and we've dealt with a lot of suicide issues and it's required us to actually broaden our scope of outside services so we can really make good referrals. Susan Stone: And also set better boundaries for us to get through the day Kristina Supler: and our own children. I mean, one thing that I love so much about our law practice is that on a regular basis, things unfold in the office at work, working on cases and with clients, and to be very blunt, we see a lot of really good parents. And then we also come across a lot of families where the parents. Kristina Supler: There's just, there's so much. Yeah. The parents are stuck and they're stuck from the outside perspective. Of course, it's easy to say, oh, oh my gosh, how could they have allowed that or done that? Or, whatever it may be. And so after Go home at the end of the day and, and reflect. And it's really, I've learned so much. Kristina Supler: That's helped me, I think, become a better parent with my own children. And so it's really nice that if I wanna have the sort of work personal boundary firmly in place, I can. But then also if I choose to take a step back and reflect on how our work applies to raising my own children, I can do that. Kristina Supler: And, and I've learned so many lessons through. Working with our clients and then Susan's experience in the special ed world. It's really been awesome. Randy Rohde: I love that you mentioned that about, and especially what I would say is kind of the value add, but beyond just practicing law with your clients. Randy Rohde: And I know, this series of conversations that we're doing with your podcast, we're gonna do and explore many different topics. And I think some of those topics are going to be some of these things that you mentioned And some of the advice and the insights, I think that you can give to parents going through the various phases of parenthood and stages of thei…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Navigating the Tough Obstacles Around College Applications Jun 22, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Davida Amkraut, a College Consultant. They discuss test optional and test free methods of the college application process. The conversation includes the advantages and disadvantages of test-optional and test blind college applications, the unspoken rules of navigating the obstacles of the college application process, and the best choices students can make to position themselves to build a stellar college application. Links from this episode: Davida Amkraut: https://dha-edconsulting.com Davida's Previous Interview: https://studentdefense.kjk.com/2020/06/18/real-talk-podcast-covid-19-the-college-search/ Show Notes: The drastic change on the college admission process caused by the pandemic (01:11) Test optional versus test free: 2 terms that every American college applicant needs to know (02:12) Why some colleges are reinstating test scores in their admission process, while the UC system and the Cal State system are maintaining test free admission to address discrepancy (03:31) Using the ​​Common Data Set tool to determine whether or not you should submit your SAT scores to the college or university that you're applying for. (05:04) An unofficial list of universities that actually rely heavily on test scores of applicants (06:08) Why it is recommended for applicants to still take the ACT and SATs even if it's only the online simulation (08:22) When you should take the ACT over the SATs (08:56) Why taking the SATs is better for those who aren't confident in science (09:34) Digital SATs and why the college board is favoring this change as opposed to the paper and pen version (10:15) Controversy surrounding the shift to a digital SAT from the traditional testing (11:15) How students who opt for test free when applying to college fare among applicants who disclose their test scores (12:42) Why Advanced Placement (AP) classes are generally more advantageous than International Baccalaureate (IB) classes for college applicants (13:26) How meaningful extracurricular activities like sports can give your application a boost (14:26) Passion and authenticity are essential to becoming well-rounded students (16:42) Kristina Supler: Today's topic is the changing landscape with regard to standardized testing. We're here with Davida Amkraut who works with students on all aspects of the college application process. And for our listeners, you probably recognize Davida. She's been a guest before on Real Talk with Susan and Kristina. Kristina Supler: Davida, we're so pleased to have you back today Susan Stone: and you know what Davida, since you've moved, it's really fun seeing you on screen. We've really missed having you. So welcome back to our podcast. Davida Amkraut: Thank you so much for having me again. It's a pleasure to be here. Susan Stone: There's been a lot of changes with regard to the SAT and ACT. Can you get our listeners up to date? What are the hot issues and changes? And Just helpful tips that our listeners need to know for the, would it be rising juniors that really should pay attention or rising? Seniors or both. Davida Amkraut: I would say both. And I say that since the pandemic, there has been huge shifts in the college admission process, largely because a huge population of the students were unable to test safely for their application season. Which led to many, many schools going test optional for the years following the pandemic. And that trend, some thought was going to be temporary. Davida Amkraut: And that, as soon as that, it was safe enough to test, test centers would open and colleges would revert back to their testing policies and things would just continue as normal. What we're seeing in the college admission world is that in fact, many schools are keeping that test optional. Kristina Supler: Let me interrupt you. Kristina Supler: I apologize. But just for our listeners who are just new to the college journey with their children. Explain what it means for being test optional. Susan Stone: Good question. Davida Amkraut: Okay. So there are actually two different terms that our American applicants should know. The first one is test optional, which means that the student has the option to have their test scores considered. That means that they are able to include them in their application. If they want to. And they're also able to say no, this test score is not reflective of my academic potential and I don't want schools to have access to my scores. That's one option. There is also what we call the test blind or test free which has also taken off, which means that students don't have any option to submit scores. Davida Amkraut: They are, they are not going to be reviewed. And the University of California system and the Cal State system have now extended their test blind policy for a few more years, Susan Stone: but you know what Davida,. I just have to talk to you about this because it appears. I just read an article to prepare for this podcast that the UC system has done a study and they actually think that they might consider going back to tests because they're finding that the overall caliber of students is lower and that the SATs are a good predictor of success. Have you read that study? . Davida Amkraut: Well, there are a bunch of schools that are saying that, yes, this test is a predictor. MIT is one of those schools that actually has gone back to requiring test scores. They are saying that that helps them really understand the readiness of their students. Davida Amkraut: I think it really depends on who you're talking to. I think the real reason the UC system and the Cal State system went test blind is because of the equity issue. Because a lot of their population, there's a huge discrepancy between who can afford test prep and who can't. And the accessibility is not there for a lot of their population. Davida Amkraut: So that is one reason why that is such a big movement in the California area. Is that, and it's Susan Stone: Can it stay that way. I mean, am I accurate in what I read about the UC system and the data that's come out of this decision? If you read that? Davida Amkraut: Yeah, they've committed though. They have committed to the next year or two years to being test blind. Davida Amkraut: So they are not switching over any time soon in the next couple of cycles, Susan Stone: If the test optional. Is it fair to say that for those schools that are test optional, that only students who get the 35 or 36. Or is the SAT still out of 1600 are going to submit their scores because, so it's sort of ridiculous. You're only going to see top scores. Kristina Supler: And I would think an average score on the sat or act those students aren't going to submit it. Right. I mean, tell us what you see in your experience. Davida Amkraut: So what you want most, what most families do and what most schools suggests and what most counselors suggests is that you go on the tool called a Common Data Set, which is something that colleges put out. They're required to put this out. And you go, and you look at the average SAT that of kids that were accepted to that said university or the average ACT and they will give you, the average. Davida Amkraut: And then you look, if your scores fall within that average, you should submit your scores. If they fall below the average, then that's your cue not to submit scores. Kristina Supler: Isn't it? Isn't that a flag to the admissions officers to dismiss and score. It's probably below our average range. Davida Amkraut: Yeah, they'll say that's below the average or it could also be that they couldn't test or there were other extenuating circumstances or that a student has test anxiety and they just started purchasing Kristina Supler: Are they really having an open mind though, too, like the variability as to why students might not submit other than having a low score. Is that true? Davida Amkraut: Well, I can speak to Johns Hopkins. So here, if you want some real data and Johns Hopkins is a very selective school or in the college world, we call it a highly rejective school. Davida Amkraut: They had half of their applicants in 2020 applied without test scores. Half of those admitted students came from the non submitter group. They accepted has without scores. Colgate the same thing. So it really depends on the school. Some schools are really, really test optional, which means that they do a holistic review. And some schools say they're test optional, but they prefer looking at scores, right. Davida Amkraut: They, like a school at Case Western reserve, they love scores, your, they love scores. And to them, they're very data driven school. And that's the word on the street. If you're applying to a school like Case. You're going to send, you need to submit scores. So it really depends on the institution. Davida Amkraut: I would say another school that is pretty authentically test-optional is Tufts. They sort of have the same statistics as Johns Hopkins. So it really, it's very, school-by-school a lot of schools, as you can imagine, don't really divulge all this data. Davida Amkraut: Because maybe they don't want to, but the schools that we have information on, we can see that half of the kids who do apply test optional are getting in test optional. My son is an example. He applied to all his schools test optional. He's a great student. He did terribly on his ACTs and that three hour test, I just didn't feel was a reflective of his potential. Davida Amkraut: And he got it to every single school he applied to. With distinguishment with, so I would say that scores are important, but you don't need them to set yourself apart in the admission process. Kristina Supler: Sounds like you navigated him. Davida Amkraut: Well, yeah, he did great Susan Stone: Davida before we transitioned to our next topic. Susan Stone: Cause I do want to leave space for what's coming for our listeners. Ultimately as someone in your position who shephards students through the process, do you still recommend that a student take a standardized test? If so, which one? And what are the differences? Davida Amkraut: Okay. So I definitely recommend they give it a shot. Davida Amkraut: Right? I definitely recommend that. Then you don't have the should have, could have, would have, right. We, we never wanted the college admission process for there to be a doubt. Oh, I wish I would have at least tried to take that test. Maybe that would have, made the difference. Davida Amkraut: Take the test, try it out, try out both the act and the SATs. You don't even need to try them out in a real life situation. You can go online and you can sit for a test and then self in, and then you can then self score your yourself. And you can see which tests you've done better on. Davida Amkraut: So the ACT versus the SAT is, oh, you know, a long standing difference. Act is notoriously known. If you are a fast test taker, which means that you can work well under pressure. That is the test for you. Right. It's a time task and it moves very, very quickly. And also as a test that doesn't necessarily test so much your analytical skills, but it tests, whether or not you can read for comprehension, if that makes sense. Susan Stone: Like an aptitude test, correct? Davida Amkraut: Aptitude test Davida Amkraut: Aptitude test like the LSAT yeah. Davida Amkraut: Correct. Correct. And also the ACT has a whole science section, which the SAT doesn't have. So if you're not, uh, like if you're not loving science, probably, that might be a sign for you to switch over to the SATs Susan Stone: science section. Really a reading Davida Amkraut: section. It's an interpreting more of data and graphs and information like that. Davida Amkraut: And if that's not your strong point, so some kids struggle with that also in a time situation, you might need that more time. I can move on to the sat, but. With the caveat that this whole sat is switching over to a digital format, right? Davida Amkraut: Switching over to a digital format for our children, our students who are now current ninth graders. So if you have a child who is a current ninth grader, by the time they are taking tests in their junior and senior year, they are not no longer going to have a paper to pen edition. They are going to be completely digital. Davida Amkraut: The test will not be done at home. It will be done at a testing center. The college board is really pushing for it to be done in schools, not at testing centers and also during the day, so that schools could administer these these tests during the school day. Davida Amkraut: The college board thinks that this is a great movement. And that it will eliminate a lot of things that were difficult with the paper to pen issue like shipping, like finding proctors, things like that. Many people in the test optional world who like really favor test optional, just say, this is a repackaging of a tool that is a two to three hour test. That is really not predictive of how a student is going to behave or learn in four years. Davida Amkraut: So. It's like again, and with everything there are debates and there are positives and there are negatives. Some students don't really work so well without paper to pen. Some students might not have some schools might not have access to enough internet to have these tests really support what they need to do in their schools. Davida Amkraut: So. It's going to be an interesting shift. And I think that your guess is as good as mine. Nobody really knows how it's going to take off. The first US debut of this will be in the PSA Ts in October of 2023. And then in 2024, the SAT is going completely digital. Susan Stone: So basically my kids who are a little older, my last one is a sophomore rising junior won't be impacted. But Christina, yeah, this is your future. Kristina Supler: It was really interesting to see the impact of COVID on college admissions and visits and the testing. And I think as we continue on the changes are only going to continue. I'm wondering for students who elect not to take standardized tests for whatever reason, right? Kristina Supler: No judgment or who don't submit their scores. How do those students really stand out from the crowd of thousands and thousands of applicants to, to have their application pop? Davida Amkraut: Right. So I like to think of the college admission process or the application as a stool. And you have different legs that support the seat of the stool. Davida Amkraut: So you have one leg is the rigor of curriculum that your child has taken advantage of, right? The school that they're applying to get to school profile, which says how many APs are offered, how many IBs are offered, what kind of scores those students have, whatever it is. Davida Amkraut: There's a school profile in the context of the school that your child attends, is he or she are they taking advantage of the rigor? Right? Is there, and Susan Stone: I just wanted to run because I think this is important. You touched on it. Do colleges care. Cause I've heard many lectures on this aP v IB. Davida Amkraut: So I will say some colleges prefer AP. I will say there are some I have had a lot of surprises with students who are very similar profile, but if they're an IB student versus an AP student, my AP students somehow always seem to have the advantage. That's my little sample. Like, I don't want to say that that's gospel, but that sort of, the trend that I notice but Susan Stone: you know what, that's consistent with the school that my daughter a…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Every Parent's Worst Nightmare: Your Son Indicted for Rape Jun 08, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by a parent who we will refer to as "Jane Doe," who had to experience watching her son face prosecution for rape and kidnapping. And after a long and agonizing trial, her son was found not guilty by a jury after only 15 minutes of deliberation. The conversation includes how a fling turned into a criminal charge and years of distress, the realistic, negative impact of false accusations on victims and their families, and prevention and coping mechanisms for a defendant and their families during prosecution. Links: Susan Stone Kristina Supler Show Notes: How a casual relationship spiraled out of control (01:38) How the truth became overshadowed by the school, parents, the accuser, the police, and the justice system (03:07) The result of a criminal charge, indictment, 2 trials, and years of agony (03:38) Why parents need to discuss the dangers of hookup culture with their children (04:30) The role hookup and cancel culture has played in her son's false rape accusation (06:22) The agony of witnessing your child's life stop and become turned over to the justice system (07:46) The lack of support from the school administration and the impact this had on the child's siblings at the same school (09:51) A remarkable turn of events: how good acquaintances turned into the best support system one could ask for (10:27) How one student's false accusation instilled a fear on the entire student body (11:35) Navigating the unknown world of the justice system as a terrified parent (13:25) The living purgatory of waiting for a second trial (16:36) Juggling college and preparing for a new trial (17:27) The necessity and precautions of seeking external support to cope with the stress of an ongoing trial (18:44) What it's really like for a family to deal with the tension of a trial (20:53) How Jane found solace in her community and other mothers going through what her family was experiencing (23:15) Finding some closure through filing and settling a defamation and malicious prosecution lawsuit after acquittal (26:50) Transcript: Kristina Supler: Today's episode is the epitome of real talk. We're joined by a parent who will refer to as Jane Doe. Kristina Supler: Jane sadly had to live through the experience of watching her son face prosecution for rape and kidnapping. And after a long trial, agonizing, her son was found not guilty by a jury after only 15 minutes of deliberation. Kristina Supler: And I'm sure those 15 minutes were the longest 15 minutes of her life. Jane has graciously agreed to talk to us today about her experience. Susan Stone: And we thank you, Jane for coming today. And, Christina, we deal every day in our practice with not just students going through title nine process, but sadly, we have had a lot of interplay between the national title nine process and the criminal justice system. Susan Stone: And we privately have conversations and this is the first time. On our podcast, where we have had a parent tell their story. So thank you for coming. And our first question would be without revealing identities, because we want to be sensitive to your privacy and that of your child. But can you briefly describe Jane what the allegations were that were lodged against your son? Susan Stone: Tell your story. Jane Doe: I I'd be happy to. And thank you so much for inviting me here today. It's an honor to talk about this, uh, process because of what our family has been through. Um, shortly after he graduated high school, my son was accused of rape and kidnapping by a girl with whom he had a casual relationship. Jane Doe: They had had an interaction at a party, and again, they were known to each other, but they had interacted at a party and shortly after their interaction was over, she accused him of rape. And, uh, as I say at that moment, the train left the station. And from there. She reported the incident to her parents who then of course, as any parent would do took action, not knowing. Jane Doe: Any facts, of course, but just what their daughter had told them. And they took action. She went through the process of going to the hospital and a number of events that occurred when you do that, when you make an accusation and from there forward, It just felt like a bomb dropped and there was no, no control over what was going to happen from there. Jane Doe: And I interject that the truth from that moment forward did not seem to matter. And she went through these, these stages. And there were many interactions between the school and us as parents, the school and the, the girl, the accuser, the police of course became involved. And then of course the justice system does its thing in whatever way it does that. Jane Doe: There began the Odyssey of this accusation that then turned into a criminal charge, which then turned into an indictment, which then turned into not one, but two trials due to a, um, I can't think of the word right now. We miss, uh, miss trial and and then of course ultimately Him being found guilty, not guilty in very quick record time. Jane Doe: In fact they, as a jury agreed within moments that of course he was not guilty and that, that of course would be the outcome. So we got through that, that took years. Kristina Supler: It's so important in our listeners. Hear your story, Jane, because Susan and I regularly speak across the country. On issues that essentially at the heart of it, legal issues tied to hookup culture. Kristina Supler: Right. And, you know, we say hookup culture without judgment, but we want students and families to understand, and we really encourage parents to speak with their children about, you know, possible consequences for various decisions. Students make, I mean, Susan, we sadly have seen many cases Not all that different from what Jane and her family had to go through. Susan Stone: I'm just thinking about yesterday, Kristina, when we had a student who was going through a hearing saying that the number one learning lesson is to be careful about casual sex, because when you hook up with someone, you don't really know, you don't know what they're thinking and how they feel during the whole sexual experience. Susan Stone: And. Intimacy and mixed with the casual nature of the heck, the hookup, seeing them collide. Did you ever have a conversation about hookup culture? Jane Doe: Uh, no, actually I didn't. Um, and it isn't that I shouldn't have, it certainly would have would've made sense. This was a number of years ago. Jane Doe: I think before hookup culture was, was more in our everyday vernacular Kristina Supler: I think also. It's probably. Year after year and with the rise of social media, because it correct me if I'm wrong, but when your family was going through this social media and cell phones and texting weren't what it is now. And I think that hookup culture cancel culture, all of those cultural phenomenons that we experienced day in and day out. Kristina Supler: It's a little different now than when your son went through this, is that correct? Jane Doe: Yes. Yes. It didn't have the fervor that it does now. It was just at the forefront and there were the Duke lacrosse case and there was a lot of questions. There were a lot of articles, a lot of I think unknowns about this process because it was, it was a good number of years ago. Jane Doe: And I think there's some more understanding of it. And also, as you mentioned, the cancel culture is much more extreme now. It felt very strange then to be just sort of X-ing these children out of their lives. I mean, whether it was school or college or a team or any of those things, like we do that very quickly now, but not so much. Kristina Supler: And to hear you mention or make reference to the Duke lacrosse case. Cause I think that was a case, not that long ago, but nevertheless, one of those massive cases that really brought to the forefront, the idea that false accusations happen Susan Stone: first, I think that brought it into the public foray, but Jane, can you tell us what it was like as a parent watching your son go through this process, going through the criminal justice system, how did it feel? Susan Stone: What were you going through? Jane Doe: I so appreciate that question because I think we often don't stop to wonder what it is like for the family and the parents. It was, and is the most agonizing thing I've ever, ever experienced. Mostly because watching my son go from a vibrant, functional, productive person who was at the forefront of his life, he had just graduated from high school, was, um, off to the next phase, which was going to be college. Jane Doe: And it just turned on a dime. And he of course plummeted and mainly it was agonizing, because at the, at the moment at which this all happened, his life stopped. And all of the sudden he became what I say is the property of the justice system. And you have all very little freedom, then you, you can't, you know, do anything other than they tell you, you can do. Jane Doe: And Kristina Supler: It was at that moment that he was launching into adulthood and starting his life, everything came crashing down. It sounds like, Susan Stone: and it becomes, it defines you. And it's hard to get out from that. Kristina Supler: Can you tell us, I'm curious to hear looking back, what was your experience like for, for yourself and your family in terms of relationships with other friends and family people supporting you as you lived through the ordeal. Were people supportive? Or did you feel like people were distancing themselves from your family, your son. Susan Stone: I love that question, Christina. Cause I know myself, when my family went through trauma, there were stages. There's the initial stage where people are very supportive and then there are people who, as I say, get off the train and then, you know, you go through different phases. Susan Stone: Jane, can you relate to that? Jane Doe: Yes, very much. It was interesting to watch because we were in a school environment and I still had other children in that same school, uh, and, and related schools, but in my son was in the same school. And so it was very interesting to watch most certainly the school administration n ot supportive in any way, shape or form, which was really distressing and frightening at times, again, because I had another child in school. Jane Doe: And I did, I was heartened by the actions of friends. Not even my closest friends, because from them, of course, I would expect, support and kindness and love, but people with whom I was a good acquaintance, let's say who and several of them who stepped up and almost literally walked with me every single step of the way, including. Jane Doe: Every minute of the trials. And that to me was the most remarkable part of this. But then of course, on the other side, people that I would have hoped I could count on did not, they fell away because they were intimidated by society or by the school, the school's behavior, or maybe other factors. Kristina Supler: Did you feel, I'm curious to hear your observations where your other children on. Kristina Supler: Did they experience fallout from it as well? In terms of friends and peer relationships, or were they able to maintain some sense of normalcy in their life as this was unfolding? Jane Doe: Peer relationships, I would say remained stable for the most part. I think it created a lot of fear among the student body as a whole. Jane Doe: Just that something like this could happen, that you don't know, you're sort of living life one way. And then somebody does something that doesn't seem like it has any merit. But then there's a lot of questions. Well, if it doesn't have merit, then why is all this happening? So there was a lot of fear sowed among the student body, by the administration. Jane Doe: And that deeply, deeply affected, um, my, my son who remained at the school, but I would say his peer group was. Was supportive and helpful to the extent that they could be. I think there were also some parental limitations placed on, on those kids just because parents were also afraid. Wow. Susan Stone: I want to circle back briefly to the both trials. And of course you have to emphasize while you were so integral, it really was your child that was the dependent. But as a minor strategic decisions and calls need to be made by a parent or as your child, I don't know if your child was a minor or not at the time. Jane Doe: No, he was not. Susan Stone: Were there difficult decisions that you had to make, or did you leave it all up to your child? Kristina Supler: Susan? Are you talking legal decisions or what type of decisions. Susan Stone: I'm going to ask you, Jane, what decisions could you have to make if at all, or did you just defer to your legal team and student? Jane Doe: Sure. I, because I am definitely a mama bear and I was going to protect my child and my other children at all costs. Jane Doe: And so of course I was integral into greatly involved in the, in the process. I trusted our attorneys, which were not our first attorneys, but, um, we finally found the ones that were definitely right for us. I trusted them and I trust them to this day. Not that I need them and I hope I don't, but I trust them with our lives. Jane Doe: But the decision, ultimately, as you guys both know, comes down to the person who is the defendant and they have to make the ultimate call about whether a plea is accepted, uh, that sort of thing. And I'll tell you the most frightening moment of my life was the beginning of the very first trial before the mistrial, when, and I had no idea how the justice system worked, no idea at all. Kristina Supler: You'd never really had contact with it before. So would you and you never in your wildest dreams would imagine that you'd be involved with much less your child, right, Jane Doe: exactly. Right. Didn't know where the courthouse was. Didn't know anything about it. And what happened is it's again, I'm sure you both know very well all too well right in the beginning of the very first day the prosecution comes in and tries to make a deal, which evidently happens all the time. Jane Doe: I did not know that. And we were faced and then faced again the next day and the next day with how about we give you this, how bad he takes this plea? How bout, how about, you know, we make this all go away and he just pleads to a felony. I don't even remember what the numbers are. And it was paralyzing terrifying because you are faced with a decision that feels like life or death. Jane Doe: And we understood very well that if for some reason, this trial did not go our way there was a minimum mandatory sentence for rape and kidnapping Susan Stone: Twelve and a half years, kristina. How long? Kristina Supler: Yeah. I mean, it can get complicated under, under the laws in Ohio, but certainly the decision to go forward to trial by your son was a massive decision that would take a lot of thoughts and reflection and, and bravery as well because the penalties are so high. Kristina Supler: And if. The jury doesn't see it the way you hope it's, you know, I can't imagine what it's like for a parent to have to, sit and watch because of course as you pointed out Jane, Susan, and I see this regularly in our practice, being a lawyer and going through it in our professional capacity is, is very different from the experience of parents and loved ones. Susan Stone: After the first mistrial was an offer for a plea renewal. Jane Doe: No. Wow. I don't think so. I can't remember to tell you the truth. Susan Stone: So did you have to go through an entire tr…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Ultimate Gift for Any College Student May 25, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Jill Grimes, a family physician, award-winning author, and media medical expert. They discuss medical issues that college students face while they're away from home. The conversation includes practical tips that college students actually want to hear about, prevention and coping with anxiety and other mental health issues at the collegiate level, and alcohol consumption and marijuana addiction myths and misconceptions. Links Mentioned: Book: Ultimate College Student Health Handbook Student Defense: studentdefense.kjk.com Show Notes: The experiences that snowballed Dr. Grimes' prowess in the medical field, namely for college students (0:36) The essential components of a practical first aid kit for a college student (2:03) How to encourage college students to practice safe oral sex (04:08) Oral herpes and the means it can be spread, among other sexually transmitted infections (05:34) Why Dr. Grimes wrote a book to spread awareness of sexually transmitted diseases (06:45) The distinction between traditional therapy and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) (09:06) Pragmatic alternatives to alleviating mental health concerns in spite of limited access to campus health centers (12:29) How this non-addictive drug can help manage anxiety in college students (14:08) Collegiate study skills courses as a means of decreasing test anxiety altogether(16:54) Breaking the stigma that only students who are struggling academically need tutoring (18:17) A first-hand tip from college professors that every parent can easily do to help their child succeed (19:01) An ace tip to creating an efficient study group (19:45) Addiction and medicinal marijuana use to cope with anxiety (21:15) The potentially harmful contents of marijuana (21:54) A dangerous misconception of marijuana use and coping with mental health issues (23:13) What parents and students need to know about blackout drinking and the role it plays in sexual harassment (26:55) The "proper" alcohol consumption method as advised by a licensed physician to prevent blackout drinking (29:14) Additional medical issues students faced at the onset of COVID (31:21) Future topics to be included in the Ultimate College Student Health Handbook; from how to create a safe environment in the event of a seizure, diabetes, and navigating the healthcare system in college (32:11) Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to real life with real candid conversations. Susan Stone: Today's topic is medical issues that college students face while they're away from home. We're pleased to be joined by Dr. Jill Grimes, author of the Ultimate College Student Health Handbook. Your guide to everything from hangovers to homesickness. Kristina Supler: Dr. Grimes is a board certified family physician with a passion for practical evidence-based advice for students of all ages. After spending over 20 years in private practice in Austin, Texas, Dr. Grimes transitioned to a campus health center and through her work with college students on a daily basis, she's really come to understand the most common medical issues that college students experience. And this experience has in part contributed to. Dr. Grimes writing over six books. Kristina Supler: Dr. Grimes, we're so pleased to have you with us today. Welcome. Dr. Jill Grimes: Thanks so much for having me. I'm delighted to be here. Susan Stone: I have to tell you, I devoured your book in a day. And I think we were chatting Kristina while we were working on the sound and all this administrative stuff. And I was saying it made me re-go go back to my daughter and say, Do you wipe from front to back? Kristina Supler: The dreaded UTI problem. Kristina Supler: Also was so great about this book. Cause I was reading it is, I mean, to your point, Susan, The book contained really practical health advice, not just for students, but people that, you know, just never hurts to brush up on Susan Stone: don't puke in a sink. Dr. Jill Grimes: Uh, Susan Stone: but if you have to get sick and you can't make the toilet go for a wastepaper basket, right. Doctor Grimes? Dr. Jill Grimes: Absolutely. Or here's a thought as you're making that first aid kit that you're going to put together for your college students to send them off, you know the doggy poop bags that come in a roll, hello, easy solution. Put those in the first aid kit that way, you know, if they're feeling queasy, they've got it by them side, you can throw up in that, throw it away. Dr. Jill Grimes: I mean, this, this is the kind of practical information I like to dish out. Because, you know, I was saying that the beginning of each semester, the fall semester, every college campus has a plumbing problem and people, this is a big part of it. Kristina Supler: I can't imagine. Well, it's also interesting because Susan and I were talking and, you know, Susan was reflecting on, her gifts that she gives to high school graduates heading off to college, or just preparing care packages for good luck, best wishes. Kristina Supler: And this book is a great guide for the first aid kit and everything else. I'm totally envisioning Susan putting together a really nice, cute, gift. Susan Stone: I know that. I'm going to cut to the chase. All right. Gotta talk to you about a topic. Okay. Kristina Supler: Hard hitting topics. Susan Stone: I'm starting with the big one. You talk through your book about the use of flavored condoms. Susan Stone: Even during oral sex. Let's cut to the chase, Dr. Grimes kids every day about sex and what we're seeing a rise of plan B and students not even using condom during intercourse. Do you really think anyone's going to use a flavored barrier protection during oral sex? Dr. Jill Grimes: Well, that's the hope and that's why we talk about it. Dr. Jill Grimes: And I'll tell you what, I'm just saying. Those two words together: flavored condoms. I talk to young people all the time and I will tell you what gets through. That's something that really gets their attention because. Say when we switch them or, uh, you know, we kind of do risky business. We talk about drugs, sex, alcohol, whatever. Susan Stone: The fun stuff, right? Dr. Jill Grimes: Yeah, exactly. When I'm talking with them, you know, I'll say, why do you think that there are flavored condoms? Because people say, well, not people don't really you don't, why would you use condoms with oral sex? Nobody does that. And then I say, well, why do you think there's flavored condoms? Dr. Jill Grimes: And it's like this little light bulb bumps on over their head. They're like, oh! Also not to be crass, but, I have yet to hear about any male that refused oral sex. If someone, uh, if, you know, if asked to wear a condom to use a condom. It's, it's not a turn under. Kristina Supler: Wow. That's a good tip. No pun intended. Susan Stone: Oh my gosh. Dr. Jill Grimes: And this is how we're starting the podcast, ladies. Susan Stone: We're getting into it. Kristina Supler: Um, you know, it, wasn't a really great practice pointer though, for us as well, because similar to you, Susan and I speak with college students about their sex lives and really personal, intimate details every day, given the nature of our law practice. And I have to say, this is flavored condoms. Kristina Supler: I don't recall ever talking about that with the student. And so, and we tried to in a very nonjudgmental way, provide some real world right. life advice about how to more safely engage in sex and consent and STIs and all of that. So this is certainly something good for us to keep in mind Dr. Jill Grimes: and for the listeners, I want to clarify that people are like, but again, why, why do you want to do that? Dr. Jill Grimes: The reason is that sexually transmitted infections can and are transmitted with oral sex. If someone has a cold sore, Cold sore fever, blister, whatever you want to call it. That is oral herpes. And they may not have gotten it sexually. Most people do not get their oral herpes sexually. Most people get it from sharing a drink or, you know, kissing within a family or whatever. Dr. Jill Grimes: It's, you know, if somebody in your family has cold sores, usually a lot of people in the family have it because it's really, really common. So not a big deal, but let's call it what it is. Oral herpes is oral herpes, right? These cold sores fever, blisters. Whether or not someone has a fever blister today if they put their mouth on someone else's genitals with no barriers, they can pass that on and give that person genital herpes. Dr. Jill Grimes: If that person themselves doesn't already have oral herpes, if that makes sense. Susan Stone: And no sharing of lipstick. No lipstick sharing. Dr. Jill Grimes: Lipsticks, please. Don't don't share mascara. That's equally gross. That has nothing to do with STIs. You know, you don't want to be sharing bacteria from your mascara. Anyway, so yeah, so that's, that's why. And honestly, the whole reason I wrote my very first book was called Seductive Delusions: How Everyday People Catch STDs. Uh, cause you know, who doesn't want to write a book about STDs. Right, people? Dr. Jill Grimes: But point is the whole reason I started thinking about sharing stories, which is what that book does with accurate information is because so many of my patients in my private practice, which was a very, you know, well-to-do area, people are, will educated well off. Dr. Jill Grimes: And they were shocked when they came in with what they thought was, um, spider bites. Bug bites. Yeah, almost everyone thinks it's some kind of bite when they get genital herpes and it's not actually on their genitals, but it's near it. It's on their upper thigh or on their rear end. And they have no idea what it is, but it's this little cluster of red listers and it's, it's genital herpes and that's what it comes from. Dr. Jill Grimes: So anyway, so I've like, I've got to find a better way to talk about this subject so that we can not have this happen. Because let me tell you, you guys know you take a young person who is confident and excited and pumped about their future, and they suddenly have genital warts or genital herpes, they don't feel good about themselves anymore. Susan Stone: Speaking about self-esteem. Dr. Jill Grimes: Yeah, so let's, Kristina Supler: let's, let's take a left turn. Uh, may is mental health awareness month. And Susan and I write a lot about this topic through our legal work with students who have debilitating depression and anxiety. And it seems a running theme in your book is really advocating for CBT or cognitive behavior therapy. Kristina Supler: You know, you write about how it's a really good treatment modality for homesickness, test anxiety, even the dreaded bathroom anxiety. So can you describe for us this, Kristina Supler: this tells us more about this. Susan Stone: I just want to interject. I just, Kristina did you get that article I forwarded to yesterday, from the New York times. Kristina Supler: Yeah. Susan Stone: Did you see that article that hundreds of suicidal teens are now sleeping in emergency rooms every night, because there's not enough places for them and facility. So we really do have to focus on mental health and we're curious what you need, what you can now offer. Dr. Jill Grimes: All right. So, um, so let's, let's talk about cognitive behavioral therapy. Dr. Jill Grimes: So we say CBT, which is not to be confused with CBD CBD oil. We're saying CBT. So cognitive behavioral therapy. And how I describe it is like, this is because people you get the immediate eye roll. You know, you say. Look, some say someone's having terrible anxiety and sits test anxiety. And one of the things we talk about is is this type of therapy and, you know, get the eye roll. Dr. Jill Grimes: I'm like, no, no, no. This is not lay down on the couch. And talk about all your mother's failures. This is, this is short, very goal directed therapy, sometimes just one or two sessions. And it's all about identifying errant thinking. So basically how we react to something is much more about our, our kind of our gut reaction, if you will, than an intellectual process. Dr. Jill Grimes: So for example, let's talk about flying on a plane. I have fear of flying. A lot of people, 40% of the population has fear of flying. And so I hit a bump of turbulence and I go immediately to from, you know, oh, you know, it's choppy air waves to, oh my gosh, the plane's going to crash them to orphan my children. Dr. Jill Grimes: They're never going to get over this and they're not going to a life. Yeah. Like I just go zero to 180 and that is not logical. And I can tell you it's not logical. But I'm having to stop that process is different. And so there's a lot of things that we can do to stop that process. Dr. Jill Grimes: In the college setting, what we mostly see this with, or the best example I think is test anxiety. So somebody bombs a quiz. Now let me just say, this happens all the time. Especially to freshmen. They may have breezed through high school, or maybe they worked super hard through high school, but now they're in a new setting. They take their first, it's always general gen chem, general chemistry. Dr. Jill Grimes: The pre-meds who are so intent and terrified of making a B, and they don't even make a, B, maybe they make a C. And now they're terrified. And that was the quiz, but they go from, oh my gosh, I'm going to, I'm going to flunk the test. I'm gonna flunk the course. I'm gonna lose my scholarship. I will never get into medical school. And, you know, substitute grad school, law school, whatever, and whatever course. Dr. Jill Grimes: But this, this kind of thinking it's catastrophic thinking. And so one of the things that CBT does a really good job of doing it's identifying catastrophic thinking for what it is and stopping it. And instead putting other things in your brain, like, well, okay. In my high school, calculus class, you know what I, I made a B on a test and a quiz in that, and I survived that and I got through it. Dr. Jill Grimes: And so like thinking through concrete examples, that, that prove you are getting into a catastrophic thinking rather than something that's accurate, Kristina Supler: Helps with the reframe. Reframe your thoughts before you, before you go over the edge. Susan Stone: Well, I love that Dr. Grimes. Every day we hear from college students saying they can't get into their campus health center. Susan Stone: I mean, it's hard enough to get any appointment, much less someone who has the training and CBT. What are we going to do about this on campus? Dr. Jill Grimes: So there's several things. One, I will say there is a huge movement within college campuses. There are everyone recognizes that this is a huge problem. Dr. Jill Grimes: They are trying to funnel more money into mental health. But right now, you know, football, mental health, where do you think the money's going? Right. And football generates money for colleges. I'm not picking on football.. I love football. But I'm just saying, we have to keep we as a nation, have to, to be prioritizing it more. Dr. Jill Grimes: But a practical moment for an individual who is in college and can't get in. There's a co…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Identifying Child Development Issues and Setting Your Teen Up For Success May 11, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri, a Board-Certified Pediatrician at Senders Pediatrics for over 21 years. They discuss parenting at different stages. The conversation includes detecting developmental issues,, the ideal course of action to manage developmental issues, and effective means to make parenting easier. Links Mentioned In the Show: Senders Pediatrics Help Me Grow (National) Help Me Grow (Ohio) KJK Student Defense Show Notes: How to spot developmental issues in your child early on (02:21) Crawling: Is it really a milestone? (04:07) When should your child be able to say their first words? (05:33) The organization which provides free infant & toddler screening for any developmental, physical issues, etc. (06:31) The best type of play for your child according to a pediatrician (07:01) Why how a child plays alone is not an indicator of a developmental issue (08:39) The age at which parents need to start observing for signs of developmental issues in their kids (10:14) Why early intervention is key to helping your child manage developmental issues (10:35) Early recognition of attention deficit disorder (ADD) and oppositional defiant disorder in children (12:16) Why spanking is a form of discipline that actually does more harm than good (15:50) The most effective way to discipline kids Dr. Bucchieri has found to be (17:11) When you know you need to seek professional help for your child (19:13) Why the parent of caregiver's perspective is essential in diagnosis (21:56) Social warning signs that can potentially be indicators of autism spectrum disorder (23:00) How to foster independence in kids (25:26) Why parents should allow their kids to be more autonomous when it comes to homework (27:48) Family meetings and their significance in intervention (29:30) Distinguishing the fine line between over-parenting and regular support for your children (31:04) Why Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri recommends teaching money management to teens before college (32:51) Sleep and its role in your child's development (33:26) Factors to consider when discerning whether or not to allow your teen to get their license (36:15) Why every parent should follow Senders Pediatrics (38:43) Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real candid conversations. Today's topic is understanding normal child development from birth to college. From the perspective of our guest speaker, Dr. Elizabeth Bucchieri affectionately known to us as our friend Zizzy. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Hi, thank you so much for having me Kristina Supler: Zizzy, we're so pleased to have you with us today. For our listeners out there, Zizzy has been a pediatrician for the last 21 years at Senders Pediatrics. She's she's one smart cookie. She went to Princeton university and then Columbia college of physicians and surgeons. Kristina Supler: She completed her residency at Johns Hopkins. She has two grown children and she's an, I have really had the pleasure of getting to nosy better through a women's retreat weekend that we participated on at, in, at a camp in New Hampshire, it was a blast and we spent time hiking and doing fun outdoor activities and got to knows Izzy better. Kristina Supler: So we're so pleased to have you join us today in your capacity as a pediatrician. Thanks for joining us. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Thank you for having me. Susan Stone: I'm going to start with an age group that I haven't had the privilege of being with now that my kids are old, it's birth through toddler, the toddler years, those cute little people. Susan Stone: Can you tell us? It's so hard to know, and I hate using this word, but what is considered and I'm quote, unquote, normal childhood development from birth through the toddler years and what are signs of what might be a developmental issue? Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Sure. So like you said, there's, you don't want to pin people too much into normal and abnormal. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And I do think a lot of parents these days really look at these trackers and milestone sheets and get nervous sometimes if their kids aren't doing exactly what said. So given that there's a big range of normal there are some good guides. You can go on, like the CDC has a milestone guide that you can go on. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: But basically, babies around six weeks of age, start to do a little bit of a social smile back at you, which is very nice and some cooing. And then around six months of age, they started to include some consonants like Baba, dada, Gaga. And then their language starts to sound like a foreign language that you can't understand. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Like they say. But they're definitely telling you something and it's cute. And then you can go back and forth and say, oh really? I like that too. And then they chat back and forth with you. And then around a year, you start to get the sense that they understand you pretty well. So you could say something about their shoe and they look at their shoe or the dog, and they look at the dog. Or you say it's time to eat and they get excited. Susan Stone: So the receptive language needs to come in. Does it need to come in or does come in before the expressive language? Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Always the receptive language comes before the expressive. And also if they're receptive language, is there. I have parents quiz their kids a little bit. If they're reading a book to the kid and they say, where's the dog ear, where's the tree. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Or, you know, on their own body, where's your head, where's your tummy, where's your toes. Then they know those words. They know head tummy, toes, even if they can't say the words. And if they know the words, then you don't have to worry so much if they're late talkers. Susan Stone: Before we move on, I just would have a question because I've heard a controversy about this. Crawling: is it a milestone or not? Do you have to crawl before you walk? Or can you skip it and scoot, and then walk because I've been hearing that it actually is important for that child's brain development to have that cross lateral motion. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Yeah. I mean, I think you're right, that there is some controversy about it. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And most kids do crawl before they walk. But there are some, I've definitely had some patients who do this thing I call the sit in, scoot and they sit and they do this funny thing with their legs and their knees and they get themselves around. A lot of times, I think it's kids who have older siblings and they don't see the older siblings crawling, but they see the older siblings walking. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: So they are, and they don't see the, so they see the older kids sitting and they see the older kid walking and they just kind of sit and zoom around. And then they are dying to stand up and walk. But I do think probably if you talk to a physical therapist, they would say what you said about it's important to have the cross lateral motion, et cetera, et cetera. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: But I, the kids I've had who sit in, scoot and stand and run seem to be doing fine. But most kids do crawl before. Yeah. So in terms of the gross motor development, they, they roll route between four and six months and sit on their own around six months. Then they get from sitting into the crawling position around seven to eight months and pulling to stand at nine months and then usually taking some independent steps between 12 months and 15 months. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And then look out. They're running and climbing and getting into everything. Kristina Supler: Zizzy, one last question on this discussion of, basically birth to early toddler, developmental milestones. What about speech? At what age should your child articulate their first word? Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Right? So that's, that's usually between 12 and 15 months that they're saying, and they, they call it a w sometimes a word approximation. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: So like, they'll say 'ba' that means bottle or bubble or baby or ball. But you see them looking at the ball and they say BA, and you're like, yes, that's your ball. And it is good to fill it out as cute as this stuff is that they say try to say the real word that they're trying to say. Cause then that'll help them say the real word. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And then usually by 15, 18 months, they start to really pile up the vocabulary. And that's right around when like 15 to 18 months, if they're not hitting those milestones, the pediatric there's usually a 15 month visit and an 18 month visit the pediatrician. If there's any concerns that the child is not first of all understanding. Cause that's the most important thing that they're, that they're not understanding language or they're not trying to communicate. Then the pediatrician would probably recommend some more evaluation. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And one good first step is something called Help Me Grow, which is a free service through the county that sends a team of people, usually one person to start, but to your house and can do an assessment. And if the child needs any extra help, they can do speech therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy. They're amazing. Susan Stone: Talk about what is normal play because, who said "Play is the work of a child"? The founder of the movement. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Yeah. I mean that, that's their job, right. Their job is to play. And I do think that's important for parents to remember. Because especially nowadays everything is, am I giving my kid enough stimulation? Are they doing enough classes? Are they in enough things? Gonna teach them their foreign language? But really they just sort of need a Tupperware and a spoon and a paper towel tube, and they'd be happy. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: You know, you remember like the example of, you know, on the holidays when the kids are unwrapping the presents. They like the wrapping paper better than the presents half the time. So a lot of open-ended play. I am a big fan of, things where the toy can be played with many different ways. My favorite present for a toddler is, is, a set of blocks that are in multiple shapes, like the squares and rectangles and the triangles and circles. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And there is some good studies to show that for girls, if they play with more blocks and puzzles, they're going to be better at math in the end. Because it will help them with sort of geometry down the road and they can, the kids can play with it very open-ended. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Like my, I had two daughters and they love to build houses for their stuffed animals with the blocks. And then we'd have boys over and they'd build ramps for cars with the blocks. And, you can do a lot of different things with them, but you don't have to do what the package says. Cause they're, open-ended. Susan Stone: What's abnormal play? Yeah. What would be assigned if you look at a child, do you agree that if you see the child, let's say lining the blocks up in a line, should you be freaking out what grade? Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Yeah. That I would say no. You know, that, that alone a lot of kids like to line stuff up. No, certainly there are some kids on the autistic spectrum that can get very, into certain, certain toys and having them in a certain way. But that, that wouldn't be like the major red flag. Usually it's a little bit more of in terms of autism that they're not understanding you. They're not wanting to communicate. There's poor eye contact. There's sort of more to it than that. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And then they may have some like hand flapping motions, but, uh, but that can also be in the neuro-typical range too. Like the kids get excited. So it, for autism it's tricky because it's, there's a lot of things that, that can be normal or can be on the spectrum and you have to kind of put the whole package together. Kristina Supler: Zizzy, many of our clients, our students on the spectrum of all different ages, and it's not unusual for students to come to us families, I should say. And, and there's some challenges the students experiencing. And, after some more digging and evaluation and meeting with various professionals, the child is diagnosed as having, autism being on the autism spectrum. Kristina Supler: So you've, you've mentioned some red flags or signs or behaviors for parents to look for. Is there a certain age when this issue of autism should really be on the radar of parents or a certain age when a child can really be evaluated for autism? Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Yeah, I mean, I guess I would say 15 months, you can, I'll sometimes start to get a little wondering about it. But then I usually try to give them til 18 months to pull everything together. But around 18 months, if they're not pointing at things, if they're not understanding you, if they're not, if they're not trying to communicate, then I would, I would start the evaluation at that age. Because number one, early intervention is huge. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And, and can really help a child out. And then unfortunately there's waiting lists for a lot of these things. If you have any concerns, it's much better to get referred to a, to a development. For mean, you usually start with a speech therapist, but then if there's more concerns to get referred, we'll talk to your pediatrician, but then get referred to a developmental pediatrician. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And that could sometimes take several months to get in. And I'd love to have that done by two. So that then if the child was eligible for some early intervention preschool there's, as you guys know, there's some finances involved in it. And so it's good to get that. I would say try to get it done, or at least started by two. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And then by three, for sure. Cause that's a lot of times when the preschool start is at three and everything just takes times. Susan Stone: Everything takes time. That's great advice. Well, we're going to leave the baby years and get to elementary school, which I kind of consider the golden years of having children because second graders. Susan Stone: It was Kristina and I, this year got certified in positive discipline. Because frankly we wanted to be able to talk to our clients because we have a lot of meltdowns from students that we represent because they're under so much pressure. And we kind of want to focus early on what is considered normal acting out though versus early signs of ADD or oppositional defiant disorder. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: Well, what I would say is in those, in that three to five year age group, There, they talk about like two-year-olds and temper tantrums, you know, you sort of expect some temper tantrums from two year olds and even three-year-olds are pretty, you may have heard of the term threenager. So two year olds, they're not always able to communicate so well, but they do have their needs. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: And often if they're hungry and tired, they just completely fall on the ground crying. And one of your guests, like, I can't remember. I think it was the the positive episode on positive discipline. They talked about how the, some of the main reasons why children's misbehave or being hungry and tired. And I really do believe that's the case. Dr. Zizzy Bucchieri: So…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Understanding Your School's Liability When It Comes To Protecting Your Child Apr 27, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Edward F. Dragan, the founder and lead expert witness of School Liability Expert Group. They discuss the coverage of his role as a lead expert witness in educational, school, and administrative liability. The conversation includes the best method to help prevent Title XI issues, the difference between bullying and regular student conflict, and the hard truth about individualized education programs. Links: School Liability Expert Group (Website) Show Notes: How one phone call became the catalyst to Dr. Dragan's School Liability Expert Group (02:00) What it means to be an expert witness covering education, administration and supervision (04:44) Why one annual training is not enough to prevent Title IX issues in schools (07:25) How to distinguish bullying and regular student conflict (12:00) How Dr. Dragan and his wife gracefully dealt with a first-hand experience of student conflict (13:20) What school districts are not telling you about individualized education programs and what parents need to do (16:05) Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real candid conversations. Today's guest is Dr. Edward Dragan, founder and lead expert witness of School Liability Expert Group. That's a mouthful. Dr. Dragan consults and works as an expert in cases involving student injuries. Welcome. Dr. Dragan: Thank you. I appreciate the time that you're giving me, Susan and Kristina. Thank you very much. Kristina Supler: Thank you for joining us as a guest today. We're so pleased to have you. Dr. Dragan, can you tell us about the School Liability Expert Group? Kristina Supler: What exactly does this business do? Dr. Dragan: Sure. School Liability Expert Group started in, uh, 1993, actually. And I was working before that in the State Department of Education in New Jersey. And I was also the director of the department of special services in a local school district in New Jersey. Dr. Dragan: And I looked at what I was doing and I, I decided that I couldn't. Put together all of my background and expertise as a school administrator or a superintendent. And I had just received my doctoral degree in education administration and supervision. So I took a little time off and I developed my firm and got started by providing consultation directly to boards of education on issues involving the structure of their departments of special education. Dr. Dragan: I did that at first. And then I was sitting at my desk one day and an attorney calls me and he said, "Hey, Dr. Dragon, would you be interested in providing expert witness services for a case I'm working on?" Dr. Dragan: And I really didn't know actually what an expert witness was at that point. And I said, well, tell me more about it. Dr. Dragan: I'd like to hear what you have to say happened to be a special education case. And this was one in New Jersey that went before the administrative law, judge. I researched the case. I reviewed it and I went to testify. Then I thought to myself, Hmm, I really like this. This is kind of interesting because it's a combination of my educational background, my background in teaching and administration. Dr. Dragan: So I thought, wow, this is something I really want to develop. And I went back to school and I got a law degree from a University of New Hampshire, and that was a specialty law degree in education administration. So that's really where it started. I had a small desk in a very small house in Lambertville New Jersey. Susan Stone: Beautiful area. Very charming. Dr. Dragan: Love it. Here. Susan Stone: Love Lambert bill. It's been a long time. Kristina Supler: I have to add I'm I'm sensing quite a bit of synergy between Dr. Dragan and Susan, all backgrounds. Susan Stone: This is crazy our parallels. Because my practice, I started out as just a general litigator. And then I have always had a love of special education work. Susan Stone: Started doing that a couple of days a week while I was an associate at a firm and then met Kristina because a lot of my students were getting in trouble in a criminal area and Christine has got a criminal background. And then we branched out into title nine and sexual assault and sexual harassment, and our practice continues to evolve. Susan Stone: So you are in good company because it seems like we have a lot of parallels. I didn't know about that law degree with that educational concentration. I'm going to look that up. But let's start with our first question of the day. And you've really covered a lot of what you do serving as an expert witness. Susan Stone: Can you tell us about the different areas that you serve as an expert witness? Dr. Dragan: Sure. Overall the, the main area is education, administration and supervision. So all of the sub categories come under that main umbrella heading. So under education, administration and supervision we deal with preschool issues where a, in many cases that we've had, unfortunately where three year olds were sexually abused by their caretakers or sexually abused by volunteers who were in the classroom with three and four year olds. So it's it spans from preschool and daycare all the way through college and university. And the college and university cases that we deal with have to do also with Title IX issues. Dr. Dragan: I mean, we, we've got several cases of alleged rape on college campuses. So what we do in those cases is we, we look at the policies and the procedures of organizations and institutions from preschool through college and university. Look at the policies and procedures first. We assess the uh, the standard of care in the field and then review documents and and other information that is sent to us from our client attorneys. Dr. Dragan: T to determine whether or not the school or agency or institution met the professional standard of care or not. So that, that's basically what we focus on. Kristina Supler: That's really interesting that you brought up Title IX because Susan and I regularly serve as student advisors for complainants and respondents and title IX cases across the country. Kristina Supler: We, we actually do a lot of work with college students, of course, but high school students as well, because Title IX has such broad application now. And you mentioned working with schools on policies, and I believe you also do training for school administrators on extra issues like sexual abuse and harassment. Can you just tell us a little bit about what, what is proper training look like for school administrators to prevent sexual abuse and particularly abusive students with disabilities our most vulnerable students, Dr. Dragan: right? Dr. Dragan: Right. Well, one of the things that I have found out is that once a year at the beginning of the year training is never enough. And many of the schools that we deal with say to us when we ask about their training. Yeah, we, we got our staff together and the beginning of the school year. We spent an hour going through our policies and we told the staff, well, you're not supposed to have any kind of interaction that could be determined as sexual behavior between yourself and students. And so that's not enough. That's, that's clearly not enough because in those situations, in those cases that we deal with schools did that and there were still issues. Susan Stone: So what's the answer? Dr. Dragan: Well, I'm not sure if we can prevent absolutely interactions that may be appropriate inappropriate rather between students and, and staff. Dr. Dragan: One, one of the things that, that I know for sure is that students and, and, uh, staff keep these things a secret. And they're, they're not going to be going out and telling other staff members or or other students that they're in a sexual relationship. That's inappropriate. So it is kept a secret. And however, many of the cases that we have worked on involved, a, a student who bragged to a fellow student, Hey, I'm having sex with the science teacher. Dr. Dragan: And it was that fellow student who told someone else and reported it. And then it was investigated and found that the school wasn't supervising that science teacher, appropriately; student was taken out of class and taken to the science room and abused. So yeah, I don't think we can absolutely prevent, but schools can Can do a lot more to appropriately train on a regular basis to inform Kristina Supler: More frequent training. It sounds like that's key Dr. Dragan: Frequent training and let staff and students know what to look for. What are the signs of? Susan Stone: We have another parallel because we actually also handled representing students against professors and defending professors accused because we see both situations. We see where students, especially in college level, the boundaries are violated and it results in sexual harassment and or discrimination. Susan Stone: And we see a rise in those professors and faculty getting falsely accused. And I would add a third category that gray area with does it rise to discrimination or harassment? Maybe not. Was there unprofessional behavior possibly, and those grays are really difficult to wrestle with, but Christina, can you I want to poke at all, some post pandemic bullying case. Susan Stone: Um, Kristina Supler: yeah, I, you know, Dr. Dragon, Susan and I post pandemic, we have seen such a significant rise in cyber bullying. And we, we regularly defend students, accused of bullying. And I noticed, uh, on your, on your website, you had written a blog about how to distinguish between bullying versus student conflict in general. Because after all we know that that not every argument between students rises to the level of bullying and bullying is such a, a phrase that's used all over today in so many different contexts. Kristina Supler: And I think it's sometimes hard for parents to know what's the difference. So what would you say or what are some, some key points for parents to keep in mind and how to tell the difference and conduct Susan Stone: Dr. Dragon? I want to challenge. 'cause I know with our parents, they, they like it when we give it to them neat. And in a box. So if you could provide a few short sentences to say, give them the barometer: bullying or just conflict or mean behavior. Dr. Dragan: Yeah. Okay. Conflict or mean behavior typically is something that may occur one time between two students. However, if, if that behavior continues on an extended basis, then it can rise to the level of bullying. Dr. Dragan: So bullying hurts a student on a regular basis. It is something that predominantly is done by one or two students, but it's continual on a regular basis. So, that's how I would distinguish the two. Conflict might. Ah, I want to sit at that table, but no, I don't want you to sit here at the, at the cafeteria table. Dr. Dragan: So that's, that may be conflict. Might never happen again. Susan Stone: What about excluding a child I'm talking from a birthday party or a bar or bat mitzvah? Dr. Dragan: Oh that, yeah. That's a horrible thing. And Kristina Supler: Every parents had to deal with the crying child and saying, oh no people like you. Dr. Dragan: So I have a personal experience with that. Dr. Dragan: Do share. Yes. Susan Stone: To all our listeners, we're going to get personal with Dr. Dragon. Dr. Dragan: So, my wife and I adopted three biracial children in a all white community in New Jersey. Uh, I won't go into the politics, but you could probably guess the politics once I described this. My daughter was in first grade. There was a birthday party of one of the children in the first grade class. Everybody received an invitation except my daughter. Oh my gosh. Yeah. And she was so hurtful. She was the only dark skin trials and in the class and she came home and she said Jody is having a birthday, but I wasn't invited. I really want to go to her birthday. Dr. Dragan: And we realized right away what it was. So my wife actually to resolve the issue and to try to teach the parent something positive called the parent right away and said, Hey you know, Tina would really love to have Jody come to visit us and spend some time at our house. The birthday party was going to be in a week from then. Dr. Dragan: So, Jody's mom was hesitant. But she was put on the spot because my wife invited Jodie to come to the house. So parent brought Jodie over. And after that, Jodie had a good time with my daughter Tina at the house, and then she was invited to the party. Dr. Dragan: So one of the things that we learned from that, and I hope that the parent learned is that there's so much more to learn about people. And so she, she learned a lesson from that as well. And now she has three of her own children and is a terrific mom. Kristina Supler: Oh, that's great. That's great. I'd like to delve a little deeper on the issue. Kristina Supler: Your work regarding students with disabilities. Uh, Susan and I do a lot at the beginning. Susan mentioned her special education practice, and we still do a lot of work advocating for students with disabilities who are receiving various types of special education services. Can you tell us, I mean, cause we often are called by parents who are just distraught because their child hasn't been serviced. The child perhaps has suffered injuries or even experienced restraint and seclusion at school. So have you done work in this type of area? What can you share with us? Dr. Dragan: My firm has done a lot of work in that area. Dr. Dragan: And I in particular have done a lot because of my background as a teacher, a special education and director of special ed and all that. The, the main thing that parents need to understand is that the individualized education program, the IEP for their child is the contract between the school and the parents, excuse me, that we'll stand up in any kind of an administrative hearing. A lot of times I find that school districts are not forthcoming with parents. Dr. Dragan: They don't let the parents know that the individuals with disability education act is a, a dual advocacy act. They don't tell the parents that the school district is supposed to inform the parents that if they don't agree with what the school is proposing to put into the IEP, that the parents can contest that. Susan Stone: Well, we always say nothing's better than an IEE more of a private assessment at the public expense where we can challenge those services. Dr. Dragan: Absolutely. And that's again, uh, something that I advised parents that if, if you don't agree with the assessment and evaluation of the school personnel, you really need to go outside in order to get an evaluation. Susan Stone: We agree. We could talk to you forever, Dr. Dragan. There are so many different aspects of your business but it's been a pleasure for our listeners out there. We are at the end of our show and we do appreciate you coming on. Susan Stone: So Christina, why don't you do our famous wrap up? Kristina Supler: Thank you again for joining us, Dr. Dragon, it was such a pleasure and thank you to our listeners. We appreciate you listening to Real Talk with Susan and Kristina. Kristina Supler: If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to our show so you never miss an episode and leave us a review so that other people can find the content that we share here. You can also follow us on Instagram. Just search our handle at Stone Supler and for more resources, visit us on. S…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    What Parents Need to Know About Digital Forensics Apr 13, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Greg Kelley, a pioneer in the field of digital forensics, with over 2 decades of experience and the founder of Vestige Digital Investigations. They discuss digital evidence and its relevance to legal cases. The conversation includes what digital forensics is, what type of digital activity can be tracked on computers and social media, and if a child gets involved in a legal case what parents should do with their child's digital devices. Links: https://www.vestigeltd.com/ Show Notes: What does forensics involve in the digital age? (02:49) The secrets that digital forensics can reveal (05:16) Why your digital activity can't lie (07:41) Why nothing on social media is actually private (09:29) Newsflash: Snapchat photos almost ALWAYS leave a trace (11:48) Can deleted files actually be recovered? (13:55) How deleting files can actually cause more harm than good (16:57) Why do parents need to confiscate their children's devices when their kids get in trouble (17:37) Monitoring your children's devices with Google and Apple (19:25) Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan and Kristina. And in case my listeners out there, missed CSI last night, we're going to bring real life CSI to you all through our special guest, Greg Kelley from Vestige and Greg is going to talk about computer evidence and how it relates to cases. Susan Stone: Kristina, why don't you introduce our colleague, Greg? Kristina Supler: Sure. So Greg, thank you so much for joining us. Greg is a founder of Vestige Digital Investigations, and Greg's been working in the digital forensics field since 2000 or so. And really for the past 15 years, he's helped vestige become one of the leaders in the area of comprehensive digital forensic investigations. Greg and other employees at Vestige work on criminal cases and civil cases, and really cases in courts that deal with a variety of issues from cyber intrusion, intellectual property, theft fraud, other sorts of illegal online activities. Greg testifies in court, both in the state of Ohio as well as federal courts. Kristina Supler: And we are pleased you're here today, Greg. Thank you. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Thank you for having me. And, you know, with your, your count on CSI as a, as a side note, my business partner actually consulted for a while on the I think it was the CSI cyber series that was on. It's kind of Stephanie brought that up. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Yeah. He hooked up with a couple of directors. I forgot how it was, but. Yeah, he's got a couple of posters and t-shirts in his office. He's, he's pretty proud of that. So Susan Stone: very cool. That's really cool. And the real, the reason Greg, we wanted you to talk to families because as you know, Kristina and I are dedicated to representing students, is that almost every case, if not every case has a component of what is or is not on a cell phone or a laptop or some device. Susan Stone: And what do we need to find from the other side for a defense? What do we need to provide? What do we not want to give? What's here? What's there? What's erased? What's deleted? And it's confusing. And every day, Kristina and I are learning about a new software, a new chat room, a new social media app. And it's hard to keep up with it. And so we're hoping you can boil down these fancy, scary words like forensics and computer and cybercrime and make it meaningful. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Yeah, we'll give that a try. So let let's talk about forensics. The way I like to describe it, um, forensics to someone in general is, we're looking at, a computer, a cell phone. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Let's call them a digital device. Something that has digital information on it and we're examining it. We're looking at it. We're pulling messages from it and pictures and web history. We're doing all of that in such a way that's going to be admissible in court. So that means that we can do, we can take the same device. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Performing the same type of search and analysis multiple times, and we get the same results over and over. And likewise too, we can explain it to someone else who's technical like us, and they can repeat the same processes and get the same results as well at the end of the day. Now their opinion on what they found versus what we found may differ. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And that's, that's an opinion, but at least at the end of the day they can find the same messages, the same, artifacts is another word that I'm sure I tell you guys a lot about. You can find the same artifacts as well. And an artifact so as not to, get too technical here is, is really something that's left over after an action is performed. So really simply, your web history, everybody knows about web history on your computer. You go to websites, you look at pictures, you read articles and so on, and everybody knows that web history is stored on your computer. Well, that history is an artifact. It's something that's left behind after you performed an action. Your action was you went to a website. You read an article. Well, part of that website was cached on your computer. That history was cached and that's the artifact. So, so that's what we're doing. We're examining devices and, helping people understand what happened. Susan Stone: So that's why everyone out there, my computer knows that I like to shop. Is that right? Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: That would be why. That would be what Google knows you like to shop. Apple knows you like to shop. By if you're on Facebook, Facebook, like know that you like to shop. Everybody knows you like to shop. So Susan Stone: Everybody knows. Kristina Supler: Let me ask you actually on that. And that's a good segue. Susan loves to shop and she's getting blasted with these ads in her Facebook feed and she goes on Google and they're ads on banner ads and what nots. Tell us what's what type of information can be uncovered. What sorts of artifacts, I guess, to use the phrase you referenced or the term? Kristina Supler: Excuse me, can you learn through doing a computer or I guess digital forensic exam. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Yeah. So what can you learn? You're going to learn about someone's habits. You're gonna learn about someone's habits, their likes, their dislikes. You look at my computer, you're going to find articles about football, Chicago Bears, and beer. And it's going to be as simple as that. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: So you're going to understand someone's habits. What they did when they did it. Even where they did it from. Give you, give you a for instance, is, is we're working on a case right now involving a family dispute over a business. And come to find out we were able to discover that, our client was really worried that the other side had information that they shouldn't have known about. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Well, the way they had it. And we found evidence was the other side actually was logging into our client's Gmail account. And performing searches in his mailbox. And the way we found that out was because we were able to grab our clients, Gmail or Google history and see that, someone got into his mailbox from a location that he wasn't in. Our, our client was in a completely different state. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And here we find out that someone from Ohio. It's actually getting into his mailbox and doing all sorts of things. So, going back to your question, what can you find out? You're finding out information, not just about someone's shopping habits or about their likes and dislikes. But what they're doing when. Searches that they're conducting online, to give an extreme how to hide a body, something like that. But you see things like that and it's, it's when that took place. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And it's also to, from where that took place as well, too. The reason why you may find that you get a lot of advertisements like on your computer for something you did on your cell phone is because we signed into these devices with the same credentials. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: I'm an Android user. So on my cell phone, I've got my Gmail, my Google account is signed in there. And I signed into my Google account on my computer. And so the history gets intermixed. The activity gets intermixed. And so that's beneficial to someone like me doing an investigation. And it also can be sometimes too, a little, difficult, cause you have to weed out, who's doing what, when and where, you know, where were they? Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Cause things you can do that are appropriate maybe at home may not be appropriate at work. So you got to kind of weed that out as well, too. Susan Stone: Greg, can you ever, use evidence that you take from a cell phone to prove that something didn't happen? Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Yeah, you can. What you're talking about there is the phrase proving a negative. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And so in order to prove that something didn't happen, you got to look anywhere and everywhere for where that occurrence may have taken place. And rule it out. But you know, you certainly can. And we've been asked to do that at times. And, and, and the way we go about doing it is basically saying, we looked here, we look there, we looked at all these different places and we didn't see the evidence of it. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: We didn't see messages. Um, what what's, oftentimes what someone's asking us is can you prove that this message was never sent? You get a screenshot of someone else saying I got this message. And John sent Betty this message. And Betty says, this message came through and John says, no, it never did. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And what you'd like to be able to do is look at John's phone, uh, where the message would've come from and see that not only did we not find that message to Betty, but we find all sorts of other messages and other activity around that time that shows the phone was being used. And we have this, this rich amount of information, but yet we're not finding that message. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Quite often, it's not that case. But yeah, you could still go about using digital devices to say something didn't happen. It's just, it's, it's a more difficult process cause you have to check off all the boxes to make sure you're not seeing it from, all these different locations. Kristina Supler: So I have another question. Kristina Supler: I mean, we know that virtually every teenager in America has an iPhone, some sort of an Android, some sort of smartphone. And there are and a constantly evolving array of social media apps and platforms available. So for particularly cases involving students in social media, what type of forensic analysis can be done on social media accounts? Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Yeah. So with social media accounts, it's all a matter of whose account we're trying to get at and what kind of access do we have? The best type of access is that we actually get that individual's credentials. And then we can go into their social media account and see all the things that they're posting, all the things they're sharing, private messages sent and received and so on. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And again, we may have other information around that such as where was that person when they made that post? Where was that person when, when they sent that message? And then of course the when. You know, the when is always important to. Absent of that for instance, like on, on Facebook, if we're investigating someone's Facebook account, maybe we don't have that person's actual credentials. But someone that's a friend of theirs on Facebook as long as you use their credentials to look at the look at the suspect's account. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: So we can gather some information that way as well, too. And what we're looking for all depends on the nature of the case. If it's like a, a matter where someone's claiming they slipped and fell and their diabilitated. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And, and we go on their Facebook page and see that they're skiing out in Colorado. And it kind of contradicts the idea that someone slipped and fell. With school matters, it's going to be things such as you know, who was where and when, and who knows whom? Do we have pictures on someone's Instagram or someone's Facebook wall that shows them being a friend or an acquaintance of another important person in a case. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: And so that might be, important to someone such as you, when you're working on these student matters. Who knew whom and when? And where were they on certain on certain evenings? Susan Stone: So, Greg, I'm going to get a little juicy here from our cases. Susan Stone: We have a lot of cases where we defend students who receive naked snapchat messages. And they either receive or send nude pictures, which is a crime. But these students tell us time and time again, they sent it via Snapchat and they thought it disappeared. And of course we know that other students capture the Snapchat and send it around. Susan Stone: But let's say that didn't happen. Is it true that snaps really disappear forever? Or can you uncover something about that nude photo? Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: So obviously, to start with, when you're taking the photo in Snapchat, quite often, a copy of the photo may be saved on the phone itself. Before being attached to a Snapchat and sending along. It all depends on the method by which. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: That photo was taken in a sense, but if you're just talking about the stamp being sent between two people that information, if, if neither party saves, it decides to save it as a snap, it's going to be gone. It's most likely it's going to be gone. And I think most likely, because we've seen in the past where. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: Snapchat changes their software code and things may linger around a little bit longer than, than anybody intended. At the very beginning, Snapchat said, yes, all of the pictures and all the snaps are gone and come to find out that was, that couldn't be any more wrong. Things were left behind and we were able to do it and they cleaned up their accents that time. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: But there's always the possibility. Some things left behind and so on. But in general now, I mean, w w if two people send a, if one person sends a snap to the other and neither saves it, neither takes a screenshot of it. It's it's going to be gone as a know with, with that time, once that time. Is, is done. Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: That Snapchat goes away. Susan Stone: You can never be sure that it's not going to be, Greg Kelley, Vestige Digital Investigations: You can't be a hundred percent sure. Right, right. You can't be a hundr…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights