TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Real Talk With Susan & Kristina

    Have you ever wished for a comprehensive guide to help navigate those challenging and uncomfortable moments in parenting? We’re Susan Stone and Kristina Supler—full-time moms and dedicated student attorneys at KJK. Our careers in student advocacy provide a unique perspective, but fundamentally, we’re two moms sharing the wisdom gathered from our experiences at home and in the courtroom.

    Our podcast delves into the essential aspects of parenting, covering a wide spectrum of topics. We dissect trends, examine case studies, and draw from expert opinions in each episode, aiming to equip you with insights on raising resilient kids in our constantly changing world.

    Please join us as we delve into some ‘Real Talk.’

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Educational Crisis Management: Making Higher Educational Dreams a Reality Mar 30, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Hanna Stotland, an independent educational consultant specializing in crisis management. They discuss how students with academic or disciplinary violations can have a chance to achieve their higher education dreams. The conversation includes updates to the college application process, under what circumstances students must disclose their disciplinary history and an effective strategy to help overcome these obstacles and show that these students will be great members of the academic community. Links Mentioned in the Show Hanna Stotland's Website Show Notes: How Hanna leads students and families in crisis back onto a higher educational path (01:21) Why disciplinary history is now a thing of the past for some colleges/ universities (03:01) Don't ask, don't tell? Should a student still disclose their disciplinary history even if it isn't required? (04:57) Why it's more advantageous to be honest about your previous sanctions (06:26) What most clients don't want to hear (07:56) Keep it clean, if you don't want this coming back to haunt you (09:09) Is disclosure of disciplinary action required when transferring schools? (11:06) What are the limitations of the FERPA waiver? (11:47) The kind of record a student should ALWAYS disclose (12:59) It's not the crime, it's the coverup. (14:41) Why your honesty about your past, when asked, is what matters above all else (15:42) How even students with grave accusations can become entrusted to be a great academic member of a college (16:50) Why suspension and/or expulsion is not the end of the world (17:37) Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real life candid conversations. Today, we are super excited to invite our friend, Hannah Stotland as our guest. Hannah has a great story. She is proud to tell you that she flunked out of high school and ended up graduating from Harvard college in undergrad, and then Harvard law. Today, she's an independent educational consultant that specializes in crisis management. And she works with families to get their students in either undergraduate colleges or universities or graduate schools after the blank hits the fan. And we, Christine and I work with Hannah a lot on cases. Kristina Supler: Hannah. Thank you so much for joining us today. We're thrilled to have you Susan's just told us a bit about your life experience and your history that brought you to what you do now, which is so interesting. Expand on that a little. Tell us more about yourself and what services you provide to families in crisis. Hannah Stotland: Thanks so much for having me. I'm really glad to be here. The biggest things that I do for families in crisis is help them see that there is a higher education future for them and help them achieve it. And so that involves both figuring out what steps they need to take to get into or back into the educational path that they were on, as well as helping the student to talk about whatever happened. And so that's usually where a lot of our emphasis is when I'm working together with a student, understanding how I can teach them. What I did during my legal career, it is perfectly ethical and normal for lawyers to speak for their clients. That is a it's a core function of a lawyer to speak on the client's behalf. In the higher ed space that is typically not ethical and not appropriate. So if the student is addressing an admissions office that the student is supposed to speak for themselves. And so what I do is become an educator and a coach and teach them how to advocate for themselves more effectively. Susan Stone: Thank you for that description. A lot of people don't know about this, but Kristina and I work with a lot of high school students who find themselves in a situation where there's a suspension or an expulsion. Now we learned that the common application which use to require students to talk about those prior disciplinary records has changed. Are we right that the common app no longer asked students to report suspensions and expulsions? Hannah Stotland: So the common app no longer has that question as a default. Individual universities and there are, I think between seven and 900 that are available on the common app. Those individual universities can still choose to include any version of a discipline question onto their required supplements. So it's very common. If you're applying to Whoville college, you have the common app portion of the application, and then Whoville college might also have a section you need to fill out, tell us what attracts you to Whoville. And that portion can include anything that the college wishes. And so the non-default questions such as the criminal history question, which has gone to non-default status for several years now, and the disciplinary question, which is joining that club the non-required question club. Individual schools can still ask that question and still require it for applicants to their institution. And so you should expect, and I certainly expect for the most competitive tier of colleges to consistently ask and less competitive colleges may be all over the map. So it's going to depend on where you apply, whether you are asked about disciplinary history. Kristina Supler: So we're often presented with a question from inquiring students or even parents. I had this little sticky situation my freshman year. But the school told me it was no big deal. And there's not really a record of it. But I don't know. Should I share that information disciplinary history with the college? There's not a specific question that asks for it. Generally speaking, what do you advise? Students and parents in terms of disclosure about prior disciplinary history, no matter how minor. Hannah Stotland: That's a great question. Cause we get that a lot. So you don't have to answer questions, not asked. Any question that's asked you have to answer truthfully. That being said, I have quite a number of, in a growing number of students where I think it is in their interest to talk about the disciplinary history, even if they are not asked. And there's two situations where that's particularly true. One is on your transcript. I don't want that to stand by itself. It's to your advantage to provide context and if you will, your side of the story to any college, that's going to see that. Even if they don't have a question, what is your disciplinary history? The second and a growing area is if there is a risk or a significant risk of third party disclosure. So that has been, what's been keeping me busy all through the pandemic is. A lot of times my students were told by their high school, you don't need to disclose this, or perhaps they were never disciplined, but other people in the class are aware of some wrongdoing on the students' part. And those third parties are emailing or even tweeting at the colleges saying, did you know that your admitted student sent me this IM three years ago? Susan Stone: Or they post it on their social media and then they send that posting to the college. We've seen that. Hannah Stotland: Correct. So they may either publicly or privately, but notify a college or a group of colleges about this wrongdoing or alleged wrongdoing in my student's past. You may fall to the carpet for that. Even if the school didn't require you to disclose it, that doesn't mean. They are bound to ignore it. So a classic example would be if you use the racist language in a Snapchat to a small group of friends at some point in the past. No college that I'm aware of asks, have you ever said anything offensive in an IM before? If it is brought to their attention? They may well decide to rescind your acceptance over it. So you need to think about if there's a real risk that that's going to happen. Evaluate the strategic option of disclosing it yourself upfront apologizing and putting it in context in order to minimize the harm that's going to result if that third party disclosure takes place. Kristina Supler: Hannah, I imagine that parents probably frankly, cringe when hearing that, what you've just shared and probably push back and say, well, but wait a minute. If I disclose what Susie or Johnny said on Twitter or this disciplinary issue that no one even really knows about, it's going to automatically make Susie or Johnny a less desirable candidates. How do you respond to that? Hannah Stotland: Well, you are constrained by the options that you have, right? The best situation would be for your student. Never to have said something like this. That would be great. But we don't live in that world. Right now you have a choice between two options that you wouldn't pick out if you could. You have the choice of disclosing it yourself, or you have the choice where you run the risk of them, hearing it from someone else. Now, if you think that risk is small, maybe you say I'm gonna live a little closer to the edge, right? This is a risk preference question. There isn't any answer about what strategy is best for all students. But if you have a student, for example well, here's an example. If this third party is already publicizing the information all over your community, You should assume that that's going to get to the college. And so given this tough situation that you don't want to, and it might be better to bring it up yourself where you can at least get some brownie points for honesty. Susan Stone: I've been wondering, do college admissions teams, when they're evaluating an applicant, look up social media about a candidate. Hannah Stotland: They don't do that routinely, but may do it. And I always recommend at every student should look at their social media and their whole history of social media with the assumption that colleges are going to examine it all the way back. They may not. But if they get a tip, right, if someone tweets at them or emails them and says, Hey, you want to check out this post from Susie's background. You should assume that they will. And so keeping it clean is a smart move. Susan Stone: Yeah. Kristina why don't you share with Hannah? Because we've seen this problem of Internet posting so much what we had to do with our practice to deal with this problem. Kristina Supler: Yeah. So it's interesting you bring that up Hannah, that is school isn't necessarily automatically going to look at social media. But if something gets on their radar or something is reported, they may. And it's for that exact reason that our law practice has evolved considerably into different areas. And we've actually developed a non-traditional aspect of our law practice that is essentially reputation and crisis management dealing with online content removal, social media challenges. How to handle, one's reputation moving forward, whether it's with respect to applying, to undergraduate or graduate universities, or perhaps even more broadly speaking job opportunities in the future. So this aspect of what you're talking about, it's, so it's so significant and it's become such an ingrained part of modern life and what students are facing. Something that I'm thinking about because we've spoken a lot about students applying to undergrad and grad school, but what about students going through a transfer? Do those students still fill out a common app? What are disclosure obligations there generally speaking with respect to disciplinary history. Hannah Stotland: So the, those transfer applications resemble freshmen applications in many ways. Just like, for freshmen candidates, some universities use the common application and some do not. And just like with freshmen applications some we'll choose to include a disciplinary question and some will not. And your obligation of Answering all the questions that are asked truthfully are the same as our your strategic choices. Very similarly you may feel that it's in your interest to disclose and or discuss something that's on your record or something in your past, even if you aren't required to. Susan Stone: Hannah, I've always been under the impression though that transfer or. And transfer e colleges do communicate. So if there is a serious disciplinary record, like for a title nine. It's going to be disclosed by one institution to another. Is that your understanding? Hannah Stotland: So high schools and colleges are treated the same by the law. And in all of those cases universities and high schools can only share those details of your record with other institutions that you give them written permission to do. So, if you're doing a FIRPA waiver, a waiver of your right to privacy and your educational records as per that application to that institution. It is not a blanket waiver. They can't go talk to the press about your title nine case because you signed a FERPA waiver to allow you to apply to Whoville state university. Susan Stone: But as a practical matter, when you want to transfer don't, you have to execute the FIRPA waiver and everything gets transferred on part of the process? Hannah Stotland: As a practical matter, whatever the target college, the place, you're applying as a practical matter, whatever they ask for you should give, or you should assume that you won't be further considered by that college. But not every college is going to talk about everything. Now, if you have a suspension or expulsion for title IX, it is very likely that that's going to end up on your transcript or in what's called a a statement of standing. Where the target institution wants a form from your previous institution where they say he's in good standing here, he's eligible return, or he isn't. And very frequently that's going to come up. But there isn't any universal pattern there, there are schools that are not very selective and schools that are not terribly on the ball. Now, I can't think of the situation where I'm advising a student who has a title IX record, not to disclose that. Because you don't want it coming up later. And one thing we know about title nine is whoever is accusing you is very mad at you. And you should assume that that person is going to want to make sure that other institutions know about that history. So I can't think of a time when I would advise a student be silent about your title nine record. But that's not always because the institutions can just talk to each other and they're necessarily going to share all of this. Susan Stone: What about these wrongful collaboration, cheating cases? We've seen a rise in that. Is that something that's really going to impair a student has to be disclosed plagiarism or wrongful collaboration. I'm just curious. Hannah Stotland: On the question is, were at least the language of the common app, and this is very common language is, have you been found responsible for an academic or disciplinary violation? If you have, and you are asked that question, you must say yes. Otherwise you're lying on your application and that lie on the application is likely to be a much, much more serious impediment to your future career, then the underlining lying offense. Right? So we people said about Richard Nixon, it's not the crime, it's the coverup. And question. Susan Stone: Cause we opened with you don't have to report suspension. Hannah Stotland: Whoa. Wait, we opened with what? Susan Ston…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    BirdieLight: Turning a Senseless Murder into a Life-Saving Cause Mar 16, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Beth Weinstock. She is a poet and physician, but foremost a mother of four whose eldest son Eli was murdered in March of 2021 when he unintentionally ingested fentanyl. With her daughter Oliva, they co-founded BirdieLight with a focus on educating students and their parents on the danger of fentanyl. The conversation includes how drug use extends beyond just partying, the stigma around the topic of students using drugs, and how any student can save lives. Links Mentioned In the Show: The BirdieLight Website Dr. Beth Weinstock's interview with Jake Tapper The KJK Website Show Notes: What are the dangers college students experience when experimenting with drugs and alcohol? (0:34) How a personal tragedy inspired the creation of the BirdieLight organization. (01:52) How BirdieLight has created enormous momentum in its mission. (03:21) What is the common misconception of fentanyl that leads to parents underestimating its accessibility? (04:27) How did fentanyl rise to become such a popular drug? (05:05) How even stress and anxiety can indirectly lead to a student's involvement in fentanyl (06:53) What does BirdieLight do to bring young adults "closer to safe"? (09:09) How Dr. Weinstock combats the stigma when shedding light on the reality of fentanyl cases. (11:38) Is BirdieLight having an impact? (14:19) Why high schools are pushing back on BirdieLight's message. (16:48) Telling kids to, "just say no," isn't going to cut it (17:11) What role does the rampant mental health crisis play in the rise of drug use? (19:21) How students can protect themselves and their friends using test strips to test for fentanyl (21:53) Why carrying Narcan can save lives (23:35) The serendipitous origin of the name BirdieLight (28:47) Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real conversations. Today's topic is really going to be a very emotional topic today. We're here to talk about the fentanyl problem that is really impacting the health, welfare, and lives of students across the country, students and adults. But our practice focuses on what's happening with all students. Kristina Supler: Susan, over the years, in our cases, we've represented students across the country. And I think we regularly see that particularly college students experimenting with drugs and alcohol it goes hand in hand. And while some students, I don't know, I guess can handle it. I think we also see a lot of students who really struggle with the substance abuse and don't recognize all the dangers that can go hand in hand with ingesting various substances. And I think in particular, one thing that we regularly see is sexual assault cases. Susan Stone: Correct. We see, and we've talked about this on our podcast, a real uptick in mental health issues. And I don't want to say every case cause that's not accurate, but I think we can fairly say that most cases that we deal with, whether it's about sexual assault or any other form of student misconduct, somewhere in the picture is a use of, or misuse of alcohol or drugs. Kristina Supler: We hear often from the students we work with that sometimes there's substance use or experimentation with drugs, for numbing and students just exploring life. And that's really what brings us to our topic and our speaker today. So Susan, why don't you do the introduction. Susan Stone: We're here with Dr. Beth Weinstock who created an organization called BirdieLight to spread awareness about fentanyl use and this crisis that we have of students dying from the use of fentanyl. Dr. Weinstock, welcome to our show. Can you please just highlight what led to you creating your organization? Dr. Weinstock: Sure. Thanks. And thank you so much for having me on your podcast today. I live in Columbus, Ohio. And I'm a mother and a physician. I have four children. My second oldest child, Eli Weinstock was a sophomore at American university. And on March 3rd, 2021 He took or experimented with some substance a pill or a powder. We're not sure. And he collapsed and died in his off-campus apartment in Washington DC. Susan Stone: I'm so sorry. Really. Dr. Weinstock: Thank you. Thank you. He was not struggling with addiction. He was, you know what? Our organization now likes to call an experimental or recreational substance user. We were devastated. There's really not a lot of words to really explain what happened in my family. But six months later my daughter, Olivia, and I she's 22, and a recent college graduate decided to start an organization called BirdieLight. And the purpose of our organization is real simple. We just get in front of young adults, age 15 to 25, and parents, and we educate on the dangers of fentanyl; where it's found; how to avoid it; how to test for it. We are now four months old and the momentum is enormous. We really have found a niche and a real need in this crisis in our country. And, we aim to educate every young person in America about this crisis. Kristina Supler: I think for a while now, families have heard on the news, stories about the opioid epidemic. And there have been many stories about fentanyl and it's dangers. However, I know Susan and I from the conversations we have with parents, it's pretty interesting how many parents don't know what fentanyl is. Or just have a belief that only certain populations would face the dangers posed by fentanyls. Oh, it would never touch my child's life. Beth, can you speak to what parents should know about fentanyl and why it's so dangerous? Dr. Weinstock: Absolutely. So I think 10 years ago that maybe that misconception would have some truth to it. That 10 years ago, fentanyl was mostly found in heroin and mixed with heroin there are lots of people addicted to heroin who would periodically get fentanyl in their drug supply. And as time went on more and more fentanyl was found in heroin and now nearly all heroin has fentanyl in it. As a parent, it's easy to say that happens over there. That's not my kid. That's really a hardcore addiction situation that is not touching my family. Well, what happened about maybe three years ago is that you started to see fentanyl infiltrating the drug landscape and in so many other ways. So you started to see it in methamphetamine. And then methamphetamine overdoses well, they're called methamphetamine overdoses, but they're actually fentanyl poisoning. Those started to increase. And then soon after that, you started to see it in counterfeit pills that were labeled as oxycodone, hydrocodone Xanax, Adderall, and none of these pills were real. They weren't exactly what they said they were, but they were fake pressed pills that had fentanyl in them. And that only started a few years ago. And that coincided of course, with the start of the COVID pandemic. So it didn't really hit any parent or a student's radar that this was happening because it was happening in real time with the COVID pandemic. And so all of a sudden you're hearing of these young, healthy individuals dying, who didn't have a substance abuse problem who weren't using heroin. And, we're just now catching up. And a lot of parents don't know this information. Susan Stone: When we think about recreational use of drugs in college or high school, I have to be honest with you. I still think of alcohol and marijuana. And can you talk about what are the other drugs that students are experimenting with that we, as parents should say, we know you could go a party and you might encounter acts because I guess I don't think of Xanax or Adderall as a recreational drug. And we have cases where that's come up. But could you speak to what's really happening at parties. Dr. Weinstock: Well, I think there's two ways to talk about that. One is not at parties. So for example, if a student, particularly a college student wants to stay up all night and study. That student might ask a friend for an Adderall to be able to do that. That stimulant effect that they're looking for. So that's not necessarily a party drug. But what might happen is that student might say, Hey, do you have an Adderall I can use, but it's not really an Adderall. It was pressed in some guy's basement to look like an Adderall. And it has some fentanyl in it. The other part of that might be the Xanax, the fake Xanax that, a student's struggling with anxiety and wants to get some Xanax off the internet or through Snapchat or on Tik Tok. And they get a Xanax not to party really, but just to manage some anxiety. So that's that environment. But if you go to parties now, I mean, this is the word on the street. I don't have real numbers to back this up, but my understanding is that cocaine has made a huge comeback. It's not at the level at, as it was in the crazy 1980s, but it's here. And lots of kids are experimenting with cocaine. So all of those situations are spots where a kid could be poisoned by fentanyl. Kristina Supler: I think it's interesting. The comment you've just made the example with Adderall, for example, and students who are up late studying, finishing a paper, seeking that stimulant effect. And I think it's important for parents to recognize that because so often parents have the mindset that my child would never fill in the blank. But in reality, the dangers of fentanyl, aren't just tied to recreational drug use. It can be students using drugs for other reasons that have nothing to do with being at a party and being social. So thank you. I think that was a really poignant example. Tell us, if you could please, a little bit, from what I understand about BirdieLights, the goal of the organization is harm reduction and helping keep young adults safe. And so tell us more about what BirdieLight does to get closer to safe. Dr. Weinstock: Yeah. And thank you for using that phrase. We like to repeat it many times closer to safe. Because we know that inherent in the act of taking a pill or using cocaine, you're never a hundred percent safe. There's risk inherent in any drug experimentation. So we tell students we want to move you closer to safe by number one, our education. We talk about fentanyl in a real sort of in the weeds way. We talk about how it's found in cocaine and what pressed pills look like and what to do if you're going to use ecstasy at an outdoor music concert. I mean, we really get in the weeds with this. Then we talk about what fentanyl does to your body and how it can be reversed by Narcan. Because it is an opioid. It's a synthetic opioid but it's still an opioid. And then lastly, we talk about fentanyl test strips and we pass them out to students and to parents. And what we do is we teach them how to use the test strip. And we talk about how to use it with each type of drug. And then they leave wherever we are in front of them. Speaking, we leave them with test strips or information on how to get them. Susan Stone: I want to circle back to something that Kristina brought up. My child would never, and that really resonates with both of us because what you wouldn't know, Dr. Weinstock is that we travel all around the country, talking about sexual assault and prevention of sexual assault. We actually hear it from both sides. We hear, parents tell us my son would never violate issues of consent. We hear us parents of daughters saying my daughter would never put herself in a position. And we've had a lot of pushback over the years in our endeavor to say that we deal with this every day. How do you at BirdieLight deal with the blinder issue or the, just the prevailing attitude out there that, oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. That must have happened to you. I'm going to put my head under a rock because it couldn't happen to me cause that dissonance Kristina Supler: Every day we hear it. Susan Stone: Every day we hear it. And it's so hard for us to be we've changed our talk a million times and we still run against that same wall. Dr. Weinstock: I love that question. And there's different ways in which we've run up against that pushback. One of which is I find that when I talk to people about Eli, and as soon as I bring up the word fentanyl, There's a stigma. Right? And so the assumption is that Eli struggled with substance abuse and opioid substance use disorder. And that would never happen to my kid. The first thing I try to do is to talk about fentanyl in a way that reduces that stigma. I don't know if I could ever get rid of it completely. But I try to stress to parents particularly about the numbers. And I always use comparisons because it works. I tell people, at the height of the aids epidemic and the worst year of the aids epidemic, we lost 50,000 people to HIV just last year alone. In 12 months, we lost a hundred thousand people to opioids. Over three quarters of which were due to fentanyl. Okay. So I try to do comparisons. I say, on the entire Vietnam war Memorial wall in Washington, DC, there's about 50,000 names for an entire war. And so what I try to stress is that this is not a substance use disorder problem. This is an American problem. And it's going to affect you one way or the other. You're going to know someone and God forbid it ever happens to you. I never thought it would happen to me. But we all know someone who's been touched by this. So I try to reduce stigma initially. And then I also try to quote things. I try to tell parents, listen, I've been to schools and I've talked to students, college students, particularly, and I asked them, do you know someone, or have you seen someone trying cocaine? Or have you yourself tried cocaine? And one out of three kids say yes to those answers. I'm not saying one out of three are using. I'm saying that they've been near or have seen cocaine. So one out of three. So we're looking at an opportunity, not just to educate kids who may never use drugs, but also to educate the ones who are using. So if a parent says to me, my kid would never, I say, but your kid might never, but your kid might be in a room where they could save a life. It might be in a room where they see a pill or some powder, and they could say, Hey, wait guys, before you do that, let's test it. So that I think that reaches parents. If their kid can be the one that saves a life. Kristina Supler: The idea is students of all ages, perhaps being in a setting and even if the student him or herself, doesn't experiment with substances at all, this idea that you've mentioned about seeing others who are engaging in snorting cocaine, for example, it's just sad. Let me ask you, I wonder because teenagers have developing brains, teenagers can be spontaneous. Especially boys often we see them with ADHD after hearing the message of BirdieLights, our young adults or students really are they pulling out the test strips? Do they actually think to use them before injecting, snorting, consuming any type of drug? Dr. Weinstock: Well, that data on the ground is hard to gather and us being relatively new, we don't have large numbers just yet. We have anecdotal reports. We do know that, for girls who were about to use ecstasy at a music concert, did use our strips and found fentanyl and threw their drugs away. I do know that some boys that live on campus at OSU called me and said, can you bring us some strips because we're going to do Coke. And I brought it to them. I do know that we do survey…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Failure to Launch: Transitioning to Adulthood Jan 25, 2022
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Mark McConville, a renowned clinical psychologist and author experienced in parenting and child development, as well as adult, adolescent, emerging adult and family psychology. They discuss the struggle many young adults experience transitioning from adolescence to adulthood - a phenomenon Dr. McConville has labeled Failure to Launch. The conversation includes how this struggle came about, tips for parents to help their children get through it and anecdotal advice. Transcript: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys, bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real, candid conversations. Today's topic is Failure to Launch. Kristina Supler: We're so pleased today to be joined by Dr. Mark McConville. Dr. McConville is a family clinical psychologist in private practice here in Cleveland, Ohio. He's lectured and published on child development and parenting across the country. And within his private practice, he has really earned a reputation as the preeminent psychologist for working with patients, young adults, primarily, who are struggling with this adolescent to adult transition, a phenomenon he's labeled Failure to Launch. So we are so pleased to be joined today by Mark McConville. Susan Stone: I do have to add, welcome, Dr. McConville… Dr. Mark McConville: Thank you. Thank you. Susan Stone: ... his wife was my daughter, Alex's kindergarten teacher. Dr. McConville, we know you're a famous author, but to me you are Mrs. McConville's husband. Dr. Mark McConville: That's right. It's like being married to a rock star. We can't go into a restaurant without some young person jumping up across the way and coming over and giving a big kindergarten hug. Kristina Supler: That's so sweet. Susan Stone: I love that. Kristina and I had the pleasure of ordering your book on Amazon. And I still remember Kristina coming in that morning, and when I got to the final chapter, and I read that letter you wrote to 20 somethings, and I read the excerpt from your mother, I just started to cry. I could not stop crying. I just want you to know that. And I said to Kristina, maybe it's because I have two kids now out of college, and one who is a sophomore, but your book made me think about my own parenting, myself going through emerging adulthood, and then all of our clients, and it just brought just a torrential amount of tears. Kristina Supler: I so enjoyed the book as well. I have a son and a daughter, they're younger. They're not in high school, but nonetheless through our legal practice and what Susan and I deal with every day, sort of know what lies ahead. And I was so struck by your approach in the book. You demonstrated such kindness towards these young adults who are struggling. And while your advice I think was so rooted in sound psychological theories, I also love that it just had such an element of practicality to it. Dr. Mark McConville: Yeah. That's what comes with being at any line of work for a long time, you begin to tease out what sounds elegant, but isn't really useful. And you discover all kinds of things that are quite ordinary, but are very useful, put in the right context. And one of them, Susan, I certainly did not intend my readers to cry heavily. But I really had in mind that people would understand more compassionately what these people are going through. If I put myself in the shoes of being a client, and over the course of my life I have done, several times. But if I don't feel gotten, if I don't feel that I'm talking with a counselor who gets where I'm coming from, they don't have to necessarily agree with everything I say or think. But if I feel understood, I am so much more available for change. And so that's the part of the premise of the book is that these kids often feel, whether it's true or not, they often feel that their parents don't understand them. And they'll come in and complain about that to a therapist. But when the parent can get to that place of, I can identify with what they're going through. I can see the poor choices, but I understand them better, kids are much more amenable to the parents' strategies and intervention. So, thanks for the shout-out. Susan Stone: Thank you for that. Can you help our readers and listeners, because we do put it out both in written and we put our podcast out, understand, how do you define failure to launch? Dr. Mark McConville: Yeah. I first have to tell you, I objected to that title, but the publishers were adamant. They said, that's what we're calling it at the office. And I knew there'd been a movie by that title. My original title was Getting a Life, as in, get a life. But they said that's a little too subtle. It'll be lost on some people. There is a developmental transition from the world of adolescence to the world of emerging adulthood. And they are very different worlds. Adolescence is organized largely around high school life. Even if you're a disinterested student, it's still in many ways, it's the town square where you live. And that life is organized, plotted out and overseen by adults, by educators. It has evolved over the course of a century and a half. And so while they don't know it, they're living a little bit in The Truman Show. There's a structure to the framework of their being. And when they transition out of that, they often find themselves at sea. Just to give a simple example, there are so many things that growing up, even if you are, let's say you are a highly responsible, effective 11th grader, still, so much of the administrative management of your life has been taken care of by adults. And then that whole college application process starts. And all of a sudden you're expected to fill out forms, solicit teachers for recommendation letters, communicate with the college about roommate selection, et cetera, et cetera. And we'll see these highly competent kids just stall out, because it's a new set of ground rules. And that is often their first introduction. Or for kids who aren't college bound, maybe that first job, the job interview, having responsibilities that actually matter to a store or a restaurant. You really are transformed. If you make it through that transition by age, let's say 25 or 28, you have a whole different sense of yourself, in a sort of fledgling way, but as competent, as knowing more or less what you're doing. And in that transition, you are fraught with experiences of not really having a clue what you're doing. And unfortunately, and this is true more for males than females, often resistant to the kind of support and guidance that would make things much easier. Kristina Supler: That's really interesting, the resistance to support and guidance. And I love at the beginning of the book, you make this observation that's just so insightful and in line with what Susan and I are seeing in our law practice every day. You say that kids today, they worry more and they risk less, which really ultimately contributes and leads to anxiety, depression. And I know, Susan, wouldn't you agree, every day we're dealing with students who are depressed, anxious. They have ADHD. They've been in therapy. I mean, don't you think they're- Susan Stone: They're frozen. We see kids who get to a point where they just freeze. They can't get out of bed. They can't go to school. And then we see the parents trying to overcompensate and say that's okay. And then when you hear the okay, it reinforces it. And then they need a legal defense, and we need them to participate and help us. And then we're told that they can't because being with us is too upsetting. And we're like, wait, we've got to be able to do our job with your child. And it leads to this cycle. Kristina Supler: I'm just curious to hear your feedback on what got us to this point or contributed to this trend where adolescents and young adults, they're afraid to take risks and everyone's anxious? How did we get here? Dr. Mark McConville: Yeah. Well, first a comment about the thing of parents, is supporting their kids and not meeting with the two of you. That's very telling. I would not, having met the two of you now, I would not see you as particularly terrifying representatives of the adult world or the real world. I know you're doing serious business, but you both seem to have a very receptive kind of gentle good listening sort of way. So for a parent to say, I have to protect my kid from that experience, tells you the equation is not balanced. There's something out of whack here. The question of how this came about is we could do a symposium on it, because it has a lot to do with how the world has changed from say the time that I was their age. When I was their age, 30% of high school graduates went to college. Today it's more like 70%. When I was their age, had I chosen, I could have taken a bus across town, gone to the employment office at Kodak, and had been making a living wage within a month, bought my first car within three or four months. I could have down payment on a small bungalow by the time I'm 20. I mean, those were options. Those really aren't options today. The amount of education that you need just to get a foothold. And if you talk to kids with good four year educations from good schools, and while some of them land terrific, interesting jobs, many of them are extremely frustrated because the job opportunities, if they can find them, they don't meet their fantasy. Remember, this is the generation that we encouraged dream. Laurel School, dream, dare, do. And it's a wonderful inspiration that we're giving. And I think most kids absorb it and utilize it. You're seeing the ones and I'm seeing the ones who that lofty aspiration becomes a millstone around their neck. I'm not going to live up to that. And so it's harder growing up. Everything you look at, from the cost of housing to the salaries, wages have gone steadily down since 1970. You have to be a much more sophisticated being to make your way in the world. And because of that, your generation of parents, yours specifically, has been the most supportive generation in history. And that's not a knock, that's praise. Because we do in fact have kids who are willing to soar. Why can't I go to medical school? Why can't I become an international business expert? Kids have lofty aspirations. Many of them meet them. I like to look at sports. I have a 13 year old granddaughter who just happens ... Doesn't happen to be, her extraordinary focus and hard work, is a tremendous soccer player, but she has her full parent, grandparent support, an extra soccer coach, leagues that are run by dedicated adults. And I think, boy, we had to go out and make our own team and coach ourselves and call somebody from another school to say, if they wanted to play us on Saturday morning. So the support. So there's a reason why, let's just take this generation of women athletes, imagine them playing a team from 1968, it would be cruelty. It would be cruelty, because they are so much better supported. So there's a lot to be said for support. We only hear about the helicopter parent, the snowplow parent. So parents get dinged for this. But in fact, as a cohort, your generation of parents has done an extraordinary job. Susan Stone: I have to share with you, my mother was first generation American. My grandparents all came from Europe to escape oppression. And my mother had a different attitude. I remember saying, "I don't want to do my homework." And she would say, "Don't do your homework, it's your education." And if I would wake up and say, "I don't want to go to school," she'd say, "Your education." And so I took ownership early on, and I was a latchkey kid, so I would go to school, come home, make dinner, help my sister. I think about my own parenting. If my kid said, I don't feel like going to school, I'd be like, "Of course you have to go to school." The question I have is I feel like it's very late. Are there earlier signs in middle school, early high school, before that senior year where you can see? And what can you do to prevent the struggling transition? Dr. Mark McConville: Yes. Yeah. So it's just a little anecdote. I was doing a radio talk show, and a father called in and said, "I have a three year old. What should I be doing with my three year old?" At first my jaw dropped, but then I said, "Well, you should be sitting down on the playroom floor saying, 'Come on over here, buddy. We're going to pick up these toys together. I'll get all the trucks, so you get all the puzzles.'" That kind of parenting takes so much more time and energy than just picks the damn room up, and put the stuff in wherever it goes. But to sit down and work with that child, where you're really paying attention to the sort of just emergent qualities of initiative and ownership, and that's what your mother did brilliantly. Your mother was a good gambler. She was able to read her opponent. Susan Stone: Still is. Dr. Mark McConville: She knew if she played that card, that you would pick it up. But what she was doing was challenging you to take initiative and ownership. Now, a lot of kids today need more fine-tuned parenting than that. And even when you say to your kids, what are you talking about? Of course you're going to do your homework. That's very efficient parenting, and most kids respond to it. I'm watching my kids parent their kids, and I see that. We don't make an issue of schoolwork because it's not an issue. It's taken granted that you're going to do it. It's out of the question that you wouldn't do it. They don't fight over a lot. But what if you get one of those oppositional kids who seem to come along on their own to nobody's bad parenting, and they come along and say, yeah, it's done. I did it in school. And of course they didn't. And then that's where parenting becomes high maintenance. Kristina Supler: I mean with the student who, Susie or Johnny, who's been amazing all through school. Has these dreams of going on to a prestigious college. Involved in every extracurricular under the sun. But all of a sudden senior year hits that moment where there's a total loss of initiative, motivation, the student starts to shut down from anxiety about the future and what lies ahead. When parents see that collapse coming on, what can parents do? I mean, what tips do you have? Dr. Mark McConville: Yeah. We call that senior year collapse actually. And it's a very interesting phenomenon because it's ... Deep in the background of our consciousness, we all sense the passage of time and the passage of life's ground rules. And that's maybe, other than say leaving home for kindergarten or preschool where the ground rules change pretty dramatically, a lot of those kids feel the hoof beats of the future. Like I'm not going to have this support. And we see that more frequently with kids who have been on 504 plans, or they've benefited, because those are kids who have really utilized that support. Some of them, in the context of a therapy session, will be quite insightful. Not all of them, but occasionally there will be a kid that says, I'm afraid of next year. What if I just don…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Academic Integrity & Plagiarism: Keeping it 'Ouriginal' Nov 11, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Eric Gibbs, President of academic integrity software tool Ouriginal, to discuss the complex nature of detecting plagiarism and promoting academic integrity. They also discuss the impact of the pandemic on cheating, the issue of academic file sharing sites and the opportunities for parents and educators to create teachable moments with their students. TRANSCRIPT: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to light with real candid conversations. Today's topic is cheating. Kristina, when we started our practice and dealt with misconduct cases we always had maybe one cheating case a year, but oh my gosh we're getting to the point where it seems like we're flooded with calls and we have to have a podcast talking about this issue because it can't be a coincidence. Kristina Supler: Yeah, it's been so interesting to see the rise of cheating in really plagiarism cases, especially. I mean, I think we've all sort of settled into life in the pandemic and working remotely, students doing distance learning, but wow. I think with students working on computers, it's been really interesting to see a surge in these academic integrity cases. I think schools also appear to be more adept at sort of being wise to what students may or may not be doing with this issue of cheating and plagiarism. Susan Stone: Yeah, I agree and it also seems like there's very little appetite to engage in an open conversation with students because, what's going to lead us to the next guest, once a school uses a plagiarism or cheating detection software, for them, it's a predetermined you're responsible and we want to expel you. So with that in mind, Kristina, why don't you introduce our first guest? Kristina Supler: Yes, we are pleased to be joined today by Eric Gibbs. Eric is president of Ouriginal, which is a software that helps schools detect issues with students in academic integrity. Eric has worked in this, I guess what you call, education technology industry for over 20 years now. He's extremely familiar with the software and the space and we're pleased to have Eric with us today to talk about our Ouriginal. Thanks for joining us, Eric. Eric Gibbs: Thank you very much, Susan and Kristina. Look forward to the conversation. Susan Stone: And there's a lot to talk about here, Eric. First of all, tell us about your company, and we're calling you a plagiarism detection software. Are we right in framing it that way? Give us a little background first. Eric Gibbs: Yeah, so Ouriginal is an academic integrity tool that assists institutions, could be a higher education college, university, or a K-12 district or high school. It really assists them in identifying or utilizing the tool for written work. What we're assisting them in doing is, we've really spent the last 20 years, assisting them with plagiarism prevention efforts. I said academic integrity but really the last 20 years we've spent on the plagiarism prevention effort. I don't say plagiarism detection, because I'm here to kind of demystify that with your listeners. There's no such thing as plagiarism detection. So students today, they get extremely nervous when they submit their artifact, their essay, their personal narrative, their discussion board post. They submit it to an ether, right? Black box. They expect to get a similarity score, this number back. They get that number back and they actually think that's some type of plagiarized score, and that's just not the case. It was something that was created 20 years ago and that's just, unfortunately not the case. So maybe we can kind of flesh out kind what these plagiarism prevention tools or text similarity detection tools do, and how they've evolved to really support institution's academic integrity initiatives. Susan Stone: I agree because I think that just because your answer is similar to someone else's does not necessarily mean you cheated. Don't you agree Kristina? Because we've seen it. Kristina Supler: Yeah. I mean, I would say in our practice, we have a nationwide law practice where we represent students at colleges and universities across the country. Look, I'll be honest, we've had students who just flagrantly cheated, but then we've also had a lot of students who get caught in this gray area, where perhaps it's a collaboration course and software flagged an essay and then before you know it, the student's hopes and dreams of medical school have been dashed because of some problem set in a challenging science class. And so, here we are. But I guess before we sort of talk about the software, I want to back up and. At the beginning we talked about the pandemic and the rise as of these academic integrity cases that Susan and I have seen in our practice. And I'm just curious, Eric, what are your thoughts? Do you think that in today's day and age of technology, the temptation for students to cheat is greater than it used to be? I mean, what would you say about that and how these numbers for cheating cases have risen through the pandemic? Eric Gibbs: Yeah, I mean, I think certainly the pandemic has complicated things. So with respect to education, the global pandemic has challenged the very basic idea of instruction, attendance, testing, funding and certainly the role of technology. And that technology is, if you look at it, it's classrooms and it's also online. So for schools and institutions that were delivering courses online, they were completely ahead of this massive learning and migration curve. For those that were strictly face-to-face, holy cow. Come March and April of last year, welcome to online learning. And this was something that wasn't just an introduction. This was a forced push into remote, online learning. So now you're having to learn not only video lecture. You're having to learn about online pedagogical course design. You're having to learn about new technology. It really was unfair both to two stakeholders: the instructor and also the students. So there's some students just are not equipped to actually learn online. Let's be honest. And so that- Susan Stone: It's not the same. Eric Gibbs: No. Susan Stone: I just want to be very clear. I do not think you're ever going to get the same experiences being in a room, and that energy. Eric Gibbs: So yeah. So Susan, there's a way for us to actually bridge this, and so with good pedagogical course design, good technology and good coaching, you can actually kind of merge the two and get closer. We're just not there yet. But with respect to academic integrity – so this is kind of the underlying theme that we're talking about. If you skim the headlines in any education publication, and it really doesn't even have to be education, it could be a major news source. You could potentially conclude that cheating cases are tipping the scales. Both remote and online learning has opened the floodgates to massive cheating scandals, right? I would argue that really that a magnifying glass has simply been lowered to expose an issue that's been going on for years now, and it's just not its scale. This is something that we see at Ouriginal which we assist individuals, as I said, with academic integrity initiatives with technology. Again, it's kind of that one pillar of the three. So, technology is not going to solve all of your issues. It's good course design, it's that coaching and mentoring and then the technology is a deterrence, let's be honest. Here's the issue. If you're exposing this and it's already been there and now you're pushing every single student in every single course now online, you have this massive issue, right? The massive scale. So you would expect to see more cheating issues and cheating scandals to come to the surface. So I say that you're just now starting to see, at scale, stuff that was already going on prior to the pandemic. Susan Stone: Well, we know that's true. Look, even back when I went to school, there were sororities, fraternities, sports teams that had paper files where you could get an old test and Kristina, we're seeing- Kristina Supler: But Susan, you never looked at those materials, right? Susan Stone: Of course not. You know why I never looked? Because my parents never put pressure on me to get the A. They just thought, "Eh, whatever you get, you get." And I tell my own kids that. Just do your best. But that begs the question. Now the file shares are in Dropboxes, right? Eric Gibbs: Yeah. We've really kind of crossed the chasm to kind of normalizing behaviors of these temptations to cheat. So it's more now if the rest of the class is doing it, can I risk not doing it? You touched on it, Susan, and this is something that I've been talking about for a while. And I really talk about it kind of as this digital sharing economy. It's these academic file sharing sites. So is it different than the times of the cliff notes or even kind of the, the essays in the sororities or fraternities? I actually think it is, this is more serious and it's at larger scale. Susan Stone: You know what, even in law school, Kristina, did you use nutshells? Kristina Supler: On occasion, but the whole idea of rushing to the law library and finding cases and books and ripping them out and all of that, that didn't happen. But it certainly was the beginning of the whole study support economy, I guess, if you will. Since then, it's just remarkable all these, I don't know, third party sources for students. Let me ask you this, Eric these unauthorized file sharing sites, Susan and I have had countless numbers of these cases and, again, it's not just fraternities and sororities, it's sports teams- Susan Stone: No. Kristina Supler: -it's science club, you name it. Eric Gibbs: Yeah. Kristina Supler: I mean, all the kids, there's various student groups doing it. Susan Stone: Yeah, groups of friends create file share. Kristina Supler: That's right. That's right. What, for our parent listeners, what should parents know about these sites and what conversations should they be having with their students about the danger of accessing these materials? Eric Gibbs: Yeah. I mean, I think this poses a real risk to academic integrity, but it also, this is a personal integrity issue as well. And I think that parents need to know this as, and my wife and I have a junior in high school, and this is a common conversation. Has been a conversation now for several years at our dinner table. I think, unfortunately we find ourselves in a whack-a-mole scenario where many of these websites are out there, and so the International Center for Academic Integrity has identified about 670 of these academic file sharing sites. Susan Stone: Wow. Eric Gibbs: And you said that some of these are unlawful. Some of these are publicly traded companies. Let's be honest here, billion dollar companies that have been funded by some major capital here. Susan Stone: Eric, is that different than like Chegg where you can get homework help? Eric Gibbs: You know, I'd prefer, Susan, not to kind of go into different companies. I think that this is one of those things where individuals will not have a hard time finding findings specific companies or resources in this. Susan Stone: No, but what I'm asking you is a different question and I apologize if I framed it wrong. Companies that assist with homework are different and can be legitimately used versus a file share. Wouldn't you agree? Eric Gibbs: I think that… I don't know, Susan. I think you have to look at this and where I want to go with this is, I think university and school administrators need to be more familiar with the unauthorized use of the professor or teacher's course content. And this is the bigger issue. This gives magnitude of hundreds of millions of artifacts. And these artifacts that I talk about – quizzes, lab manuals, essays, exams – that are in current circulation that are sent to these file sharing sites, right? So this is the Napster of academia. So students actually are solicited or send files to some of these file sharing companies or sites, or however you want to describe them. Then these companies then can then sell this information, right? So they're sending back then the answers from the students that have actually submitted. Students then will get a token for future submissions. Essentially, it's just, I don't want to say a scheme, but you basically get credits to be able to actually create additional solicitations. Susan Stone: What do you mean by credit? Is that money? Eric Gibbs: It's basically you create an account, you then can get two additional submissions, or you can use utilize two papers. I'm going to use the word papers, because it's reflective of what, at Ouriginal, we could actually then deter. You get two credits, I could then say, okay, I'm going to actually take or search for my psychology papers. If I put in my business paper or my business homework, then I'm going to get two more credits, right? So I can then take now two more credits to go back and look for my chemistry work now that I want to look for. And then if I put in then my econ homework, then I'm going to get three more credits. So it's just this continual scheme of the more content that I put in, the more content then I can actually pull out. So this- Susan Stone: Oh my gosh. Eric Gibbs: Again, I empathize with both students and instructors. So on the instructors side, if we go back to the three pillars, good course design. For an instructor to create good, high quality content, they have to take hours. I mean, don't create a multiple choice question or assessment. Susan Stone: Exactly. Eric Gibbs: That it's going to take minutes, if not seconds, for students to be able to share. Create something that's going to take very… It's something that's going to take critical thinking skills or something that's non-traditional. Go out and require them to actually video themselves doing a personal narrative, or do something… a vlog, right? As soon as that gets submitted, that question, to one of these academic file sharing sites, that immediately is gone and you can change it around but what happens to that intellectual property of the instructor that now is actually submitted to the academic file sharing site? It immediately is then submitted to all of those students that now are actually sharing this, right? Then I empathize with that instructor that has taken a couple hours, four or five hours, that they're trying to do their best work. Again, to avoid the multiple choice or the easy way out. So, this is where you don't want to normalize the behavior that's trending with that file sharing or that study smarter study quicker. Move away from the model that rewards attainment of degrees that one could identify proves the skills would be highly desirable from the workforce. So here's the issue. The International Center for Academic Integrity said that where are those programs that cheat have integrity issues the most? It's business, it's engineering, it's nursing. Those were the top three. So structurally do I want to drive across a bridge if I know that it's compromised engineering? Nursing, I get into a critical car crash. Do I want to go to the ICU if I… This is where it's not just about my individu…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Beyond Greek Life: Understanding the Complexities of Hazing Oct 27, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by educator-turned-consultant Dr. Dawn Wiese to discuss the complexities of hazing in fraternities and other organizations on campus, as well as in other settings prior to and beyond college. The conversation takes place in light of the newly-enacted Collin's Law, which toughens Ohio's hazing violations. TRANSCRIPT: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real, candid conversations. Today's topic is hazing. And what prompted us to want to talk about hazing this month is that on October 7th in Ohio, Collins law was passed. And that law now makes stricter sanctions for individuals who are found responsible for participating in hazing, in either fraternities or other organizations on campus. And Kristina, we've dealt with a lot of hazing cases in our practice and we don't see it going away. What do you think? Kristina Supler: I think this is such an important topic; we're so pleased to be joined today by Dr. Dawn Wiese to speak with us about hazing, because hazing is a situation where there's no win, win. In fact, it's lose, lose so often. Students are in terrible positions, their organization, sports teams, any sort of group. There's a struggle there with how to address and respond and then institutions as well, high schools, colleges, they have their views and obligations, and we don't have to get into all the legalese of it. But it's just a tough topic because at the end of the day, we want students to be together and bond and have fun, but in a safe way. So as I mentioned, we're so pleased today to have Dr. Wiese with us. Susan: Dr. Wiese, it's hard to find the right person to talk about this very critical issue that has had terrible consequences in the state of Ohio. We know about two hazing deaths, and we were looking for the right person and called around and all roads led back to you. I just want to brag about you for a moment. You are a former Dean of freshman at Washington and Lee, where you also then served as the vice president for student affairs and Dean of students. And now you are a consultant, and I know that you have consulted in many cases on the issue of hazing. So I welcome you and can't wait to get some information. So to kick it off, as we've said, we've seen a lot of hazing going on in fraternities. And could you tell us a little bit about what you know about hazing? Dr. Dawn Wiese: Sure. And I think you're right in terms of how you capture it is a complex issue and it's a difficult to talk about issue, because it's, you talk about it and then it's suddenly, oh, we can't talk about this anymore. This is a horrible thing. The complexity of it and understanding the complexity of it, particularly for parents, is so important. And I'll start by saying, I'm also the parent of, I'm a parent of a current college senior. So I'm not only seeing the college experience for my own professional experience, but now going through it as a mom. So let me start by saying hazing is a problem. There's absolutely no doubt about it. It is something that as parents, we need to be thinking about as college administrators think about it, all of those things. It's also important to recognize that it's not isolated to college campuses, and certainly not isolated to Greek life. One of the great misnomers is that if your student joins fraternity or sorority, they're going to experience hazing. That's not necessarily true. And we can talk more about what that means. In fact, I would argue that most times it's not true, but we could talk more about that in a bit. Hazing starts in elementary school, maybe even earlier, I don't know, but in terms of documentation on it, it's back to those very early years as learned behavior with a spotlight really going on during those college years. And fraternities, I think provide a good, a good way to draw attention to it. Although you see it in other ways in the medium, we can talk more about that. Kristina: Susan, I think it's so interesting. I'm curious to hear your thoughts, when Dr. Wiese says that hazing starts in elementary school. It makes me think about our cases in the special ed context, but also in other contexts, when we're representing young students who are dealing with issues involving bullying and harassment and it's, I mean, what do you think Susan, it's interesting to see fast forward? Susan: I want to ask you a question, because we know that for younger children, everything happens in one of two places: the playground or the bus. And the jargon for younger children would be, as Kristina said, bullying. So I want to get our definition straight and make sure that we're all talking about the same thing. When you say hazing early on as elementary school, how do you define that term? Dr. Wiese: I think that's a great question. Are you, were you asking me, are we asking Kristina? Susan: No, I'm at asking you, yeah. Dr. Wiese: So, I would put all of this under the category of harassment, certainly a very weighty legal term in that there's hazing, there's bullying. Hazing, I think tends to be when you're talking more about those rites of passage or joining something while bullying may be restricting. But really what we're talking about regardless is harassment and that, and yes, harassment on the playground, in the workplace. It is certainly not isolated to college campuses. Susan: That's interesting. So would you define hazing as if you want to be in our group, you have to wear the same Jordache jeans… I'm dating myself, Dr. Wiese… For all out there, do you remember I'm 55, Gloria Vanderbilt and the comb in the back pocket? I digress, but go on. Dr. Wiese: I had those Jordache, I begged for them. So I remember them well. So hazing, yes, could well be that or hazing could be used from a bullying perspective as well of trying to haze someone out of something, right? So to say that it is just one thing, again, that's why I tend toward that larger umbrella of harassment. Kristina: I'm curious, this umbrella of harassment, hazing… I think everyone would agree hazing on the surface is a bad thing. And I think perhaps where people part ways is what is hazing. But I want to circle back to something you said a few minutes ago about really emphasizing, it's not limited to Greek life. And I would certainly concur and that Susan and I in our law practice representing students across the country, we see it in a multitude of contexts, not just Greek life. But I mean, talk a little bit more about your belief that fraternities aren't really the problem here. Dr. Wiese: Sure. So thanks for asking that. So, does hazing sometimes happen in fraternities or Greek life? Yes. Does it happen in athletics? Sometimes, yes. Does it happen in marching bands? Sometimes, yes. Does it happen in groups that none of us know about? Yes. And so that's really what the issue is. And so I would argue that… let me go to the concept of the Greek system… is that the Greek system is not where the issue is. And in fact, I would argue it's one of the solutions. And so an example, let's talk about institutions where there's no Greek life. Does that mean there is no hazing? Absolutely not. As a vice president on a campus with Greek life, I relied on those national fraternal partners to be a part of the education solution. And that's why I think it's important not to think of hazing as a Greek problem, but rather a larger educational issue, that the education can come from from many different places. And so then it becomes understanding, what are the types of organizations that your students are choosing to join when they go to college. And then what does that mean? And what are your conversations with your student? Susan: I have to ask the challenging question though. I agree with you because Kristina and I have cases where there's hazing on or hazing allegations on athletic teams and other social organizations like the band. But, it appears that the most serious hazing occur, not in sororities, but in fraternities. I mean, I was in a sorority, I'm proud of my sorority affiliation. I would not say that I was hazed. I was, to this day, I keep in touch with my big sister in sorority. But the extreme drinking to the point of death, I only know about it in the fraternity context. Dr. Wiese: Well and I would disagree because I think we just have to pull the lens back a little bit and we can look at, for instance, the Champion case at Florida Florida A and M. But again, that's a marching band situation, right? Another serious hazing situation I believe was at the Ohio State. And so I tend, do we hear about it in fraternities? Absolutely. Absolutely we do. Are there high risk behaviors that happen there? Absolutely. Is that the only place where high risk behaviors occur? Absolutely not. And that's when it becomes a part of, from my perspective as a former college administrator, whether fraternities exist or not, students are going to join groups, right? That's what people do. People join groups. And my view of that fraternal world, that national fraternal world, nd that's also an important distinction, is that they provide an educational arm that if fraternities did not exist or sororities, were missing part of that educational component and those students would be joining something else, perhaps recognized perhaps something entirely unrecognized. And then let me also go to the national versus local distinction. When we hear about Greek life, it tends to be that we hear about, we tend to think about these organizations that are part of something that you see, you might see the same letters on multiple college campuses. That's when something is a part of a national organization. And those national organizations are the ones that have those broad educational programs. Then there are local organizations. And when these stories hit the news, they don't distinguish between local and national organizations. They just say fraternity. Local organizations are just that, they are a club. So my daughter, for example, at her college, they have a blend of local and national organizations. She chose the one national sorority of five on her campus. And so she, her sorority experiences come with that educational component. The other four are local clubs. Kristina: Dr. Wiese, it's interesting to hear you talk about some of your personal experience, your daughter in particular. So I'm curious, I'd like to hear, drawing not only from your professional experience as a vice president for student affairs and working in higher ed, but also as a professional consultant and really a parent. What advice can you provide to parents for the types of questions they should be asking when their children are exploring organizations to join? Like what do parents need to know and how can parents talk to their kids about what they should be asking? Dr. Wiese: I appreciate you asking that question and I'll share a story with you about the first time I know my daughter was hazed. It was at her summer camp when she was going from fourth grade to fifth grade. And she came home from summer camp and she was telling me all of these stories about how she was moving from being I, maybe it was five to six, but I think it was from being the fourth year of her camp to the fifth year in her camp. And to become a fifth year, she had to do a number of silly things. They were blindfolded, they had to run around, things like that. And at the time I was a vice president. I'm like, oh my gosh, she was hazed. Because that meets the legal definition of hazing, right? Doing something that where someone is saying, I want you to do this, to join this, and not something that they would otherwise do. And it doesn't matter whether or not it's dangerous or that. What happened to her at that summer camp was hazing. And that was the first time she and I had a conversation about hazing and how, and of course growing up with the work I was doing she was forced into a lot of conversations at a very young age. Susan: I talk too much. And they always say to me, you only see when it goes wrong, mom. Stop. Dr. Wiese: Well and I appreciate you saying that because 99, I don't know the percentage, but for the vast majority of college students, vast majority people who attend summer camp, vast majority of people who are marching bands, they're having an amazing experience, an absolutely amazing experience. And we have to remember that. And so then it goes back to Kristina, your point, that it's having the conversations with our sons and daughters so that we understand what's happening. So as much as we can and we are setting our expectations for how we want them to live their lives and those conversations matter, not only in that K-12 period, but when they go to college. Mounds of evidence that the parental influence in college matters. And so to go back to your question, what should we as parents of college students be saying? We should know the organizations they are joining. We should be asking what's going on in those organizations in a caring way. Because we all know as parents and said if we're just going, what's happening? What's happening? That's when they shut down, right? But we should be curious. We should, just like in high school, we want to know who their friends are. You should know who their friends are in college. Who are they hanging out with? From a fraternal perspective, is there alumni involvement in the chapter? And is that alumni, are those alumni 23 and 24 or those alumni 40, 35, 40? And I would argue that the 35, 40 matters, right? Because those are people who have said my fraternity experience was important enough to me that I want to see that you will have a good experience. 23, 24, those are kids still hanging around college, that's different. And so those are the types of things I think that you need to be as a parent thinking about in setting your expectations. So I'll go back to my daughter's summer camp experience. When she told me what happened at summer camp, we talked about the concept of rites of passage. Those aren't the words I used, but we talked about those concepts and I also talked with her about how those things can go wrong and that she, as she got, as she became older, she had a responsibility to know the difference. Susan: So let's talk about the difference, because I also think that some rite of passages, like a Bar Mitzvah, are beautiful rites of passages. Or I remember attending Kristina's daughter's communion party. I mean, religious rites of passages are part of growing up. Same with joining a team and paying your dues and then finally being this senior. How do you educate younger children what's fun rites of passage and just paying your dues versus hazing. Is it alcohol? Is that the differentiator or is it something that makes you nervous or scared? What's the line? Dr. Wiese: I think that's an excellent question. Not one that I'm sure I can answer well. As a college administrator, as a former college administrator, as someone who works with these issues, I would have to say, it's not okay, right? That's what a college administrator will always say. There is no line, there's nowhere that it's okay. And the parallel I want to draw is to underage drinking. And I can think of a phone call I received one time f…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Power of Positive Discipline Sep 24, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Certified Positive Discipline Lead Trainers Kelly Pfeiffer and Dodie Blomberg to talk about positive discipline and how parents can use it as a tool to empower and grow their children while fostering true connection. TRANSCRIPT: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. We're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our students defense legal practice to light with real candid conversation. Today's topic is discipline, in particular, positive discipline. We bring with us two special guests, Kelly Pfeiffer, and Dodie Blomberg. Kelly Pfeiffer: Thanks for having us. Kristina Supler: Our pleasure. We're so pleased today to have Kelly and Dodie with us. Both women are Certified Positive Discipline Lead Trainers and have years of experience with the topic that is positive discipline. So ladies, before we dive in, why don't you give us a little bit of your own background? Tell us about yourselves. Kelly Pfeiffer: I'm Kelly Pfeiffer and when I became a mom years and years and years ago, I'd say 28 years ago, I was struggling. I knew I didn't want to discipline my children the exact same way that I did before. I found positive discipline 28 years ago. Then, I decided I wanted to start teaching it. Currently, I have two children who are 28 and 25 and two stepchildren who are 28 and 26 and I live in Greenville, South Carolina. Susan Stone: Thank you, Kelly. That's a great introduction. Dodie? Dodie Blomberg: So, I'm Dodie Blomberg and I started my career as a classroom teacher and I had a really hard first year. I didn't have the tools and skills I needed to manage really tough fifth graders. They're tougher than they seem. A few years in, a friend said, "Hey, take this training." It's positive discipline in the classroom. I thought it was so amazing. It gave me tools that I just didn't even know existed to grow kids' skills and to grow my own skills with social, emotional, relationships, communication. I didn't even know that was out there. Then a few years later, I got married and had two kids. Then I learned you can use this on with your own children. Of course, everyone knew that. I just took a little time to figure that out. Then, like Kelly, I love this work. I got trained. I've been practicing this work since 1995. I'm still learning. My children now are 26 and 23 and they're pretty good people. We have a good relationship and I just really think positive discipline has helped it along the way. Susan Stone: Well, I would like to share with our listening audience that, as you know, Kristina and I work with students every day and we get a lot of parenting questions when we have to advise parents on how to handle certain circumstances, such as it might sound, "Go on spring break when there's a pending tons of charges." We realized early on that people were not asking us for legal questions but parenting questions and that lead us to want to learn more for our own business. I can share that Dodie and Kelly certified us in positive discipline. I've also seen a change not only on how we speak to our clients who are students, but my own family. So, I thank you for imparting your knowledge on us, but we'd like you guys to talk to our audience. Can you tell us what is positive discipline? Dodie Blomberg: So, positive discipline basically is a group of skills and tools that adults can use to help grow children's skills and tools like teaching respect, responsibility, communication, listening, problem solving, and more. And I don't know about all of you, but I didn't learn all of those growing up. Like my growing up was you obey adults. But then as a kid, what did I do when I was on my own and I had to solve problems? I didn't know how to do that. I just knew how to follow directions. So really, ideally, how do we teach our kids to think, to solve problems, to think through things so they become adults who know how to do that? Kelly, do you want to add on? Kelly Pfeiffer: I can just add one more thing. Traditional discipline generally focuses on getting rid of behaviors. So, we want them to go away. Those behaviors that are annoying or dangerous. Positive discipline instead focuses on adding to the child, helping them learn new skills and tools. So, I love to explain that difference, that we're not taking away until we add something because children are going to use the same tools that they have until they have new tools. So we need to… the focus is on teaching children these new life skills and tools [crosstalk] Susan Stone: How about an example, ladies? Dodie Blomberg: So, let's just start with little kids. Because I think little kids is just like, you could see the starting point and where you're going. So young children, they have harsh tools, right? You see kids in preschool. They're hitting. They're biting. They're grabbing. Those are the tools they know. It gets results quickly. Now we don't want our kids to have those… Use those tools long term so we need to replace them with the tools. So, we teach kids gentle hands, ask for the toy, take time to share, teeth are for chewing, not biting. Right? Like really teaching the tools we want so they know what to do. That's more helpful than hurtful tools as a beginning place. Kelly, can you add another one? Kelly Pfeiffer: One thing I remember Jane Nelson saying a lot is that when children make a mistake or have a misbehavior, that the parents tell the kids what happened, what caused it to happen, what they can do about it and what can they do in the future to prevent it. In a positive discipline, let's see a teenager gets a speeding ticket, we might lecture about it, tell them what they need to do. Then instead of positive discipline, we ask the teen, "Wow, what happened? Tell me what was going on. What do you think caused that to happen?" We're having to pause and wait for them to think and come up with answers. "Wow, what do you think you can do about this speeding ticket and what do you think you can do in the future about this?" Kristina Supler: Kelly I'm glad you brought up that example of teenagers and the speeding tickets because I was going to ask, is positive discipline geared more towards younger children? You talk about it's a philosophy designed to give parents and children really more tools to bring to problem solving, but it sounds like what you're saying is it can be used for children of all ages. Is that correct? Kelly Pfeiffer: It is. So, as a young child, I might only ask, "Wow, what happened?" if the child is three or four because they may not be able to process those questions. Then, when that same time gets to be six, maybe I'll ask, "Oh, what happened? What caused it to happen?" When they're older, I just add on the questions. By the time they're teenagers, we just added on more skills. We are inviting them to think about problem solving. So, it is for all ages and we do have to think about the child's developmental stage and age as to how we apply each tool. Dodie Blomberg: Kelly, can I add to that? The beauty of this is it becomes their own self-talk. Right? So when they end up with a challenge or a difficulty, instead of saying, "Oh my gosh, I'm in trouble. Don't let mom or dad learn." The self-talk might be, "Oh my gosh, what happened? What did I do? What do I need to do? How can I get help? How do I solve this?" They get a new self-talk that helps them solve the problem instead of just being afraid of getting in trouble. Susan Stone: How's it different than logical consequences? Dodie Blomberg: I personally think logical consequences can be challenging. Most of us use them because that's what we're raised with. But often people use logical consequences as punishment. Let's think of a punishment that'll match this issue. The child is driving badly with their car and taking the keys away. Driving badly, take the keys away. That would be a logical consequence. Now that could also be a solution. It could be. If you sit down and have a good talk through conversation with your child and find out what their reasons were. Who was in the car? What made you drive quickly? Maybe underneath, you find out it has to do with that friend in the car who's always telling him to hit the accelerator. So, maybe a better solution is that friend can't drive with you. You can still drive the car to school, but you can't have that friend in the car. That might be a better solution. Kelly, ideas on logical consequences? Kelly Pfeiffer: One thing I want to add is if you're just trying to cause blame, shame and pain with your logical consequence, that's probably you're just trying to punish and then disguise it as a logical consequence. So to change the mindset to a positive discipline mindset is to focus on solutions because we can't change the past. We can only change what happens in the future and to focus on really what might be helpful because if we're just using blanket consequences, they might not be helpful at all in solving the problem. But just like you said, Dodie, drilling down to, "Oh, it's the friend. Oh, then let's focus our solution on- Susan Stone: Right skills. Kristina Supler: So Kelly, a question I have is when you're talking about having a conversation to think things through, analyze what happened, and arrive at solutions, how is that conversation and looking for solutions different from not imposing any discipline at all in the child? Kelly Pfeiffer: Oh yes. So lots of people think if you're not punishing or giving consequences, then you're being permissive and we're definitely not recommending permissive parenting at all. So, the solution-focused conversation is joint problem solving and also teaching skills for the future. So, if there wasn't a conversation at all and people just forgot about it and said, "Oh, don't do that again, honey." We might call that permissive parenting because the parent is not addressing the problem. Another piece of this is timing to address the problem because right when the parents find out about a ticket or an accident in a car accident, the parents might be really upset. And the teen's probably really upset and that is not the time to have the conversation. So another piece of having this conversation is to wait until people have calmed down, everyone is calmed down so that you can focus on solutions. Dodie, anymore about permissive parenting for me. What's going on with [inaudible] Dodie Blomberg: Yeah. The other thought I have is permissive parenting. The weight of the problem never sits in the child's lap or the teenagers lap. The parent holds the weight when you're going to, and now you're going to, and now the situation is and the parents is holding all the weight of the problem, right? The situation that happened. Ideally, you'd let the situation just sit in your teenager's lap and you're going to talk about how they're going to solve it. Let's talk through the ways you can fix this problem because it's your problem. Do you feel the weight of the problem? Does that make sense? Kristina Supler: Yeah and actually I am just… In your experience teaching this view of discipline over the many years that you've done. So I would imagine when parents engage in joint problem solving, does that help achieve more… I don't know, I guess what some might call buy-in from the child? To help be invested in the solution versus just feeling like I have to do this because my mother is making me. Dodie Blomberg: Yeah. I want to add that. What often happens when we use punishment or quote consequences, it ends up being a wrestling match between us and the kids. Well, my parents and now I have to it's my parents' fault. Like all of a sudden, it's not the problem that happened. It's all about the parent. They're angry at the parent. So ideally, the problem would sit there and they kind of think of it as a visual, like sometimes we feel like we're opposite our child and we're wrestling with this problem back and forth. It said definitely setting the problem in their lap and then sitting next to them and you're both looking at this problem like, "Ugh, [crosstalk] that's a big problem." Susan Stone: Team. I think that's the thing. We're on the same team. I'm with you. Let's get to the root behind these issues. Is there a psychological foundation of what's behind misbehavior? Dodie Blomberg: Well, according to positive discipline, Rudolph Dreikurs came up with four main reasons people misbehave. If we back up even farther, all human beings want belonging and significance. If we think about that for ourselves, we all kind of know that. We like when we belong somewhere. We like when we matter somewhere, peer pressure, all of that, it has to do with belonging and significance. Besides being tired, hungry, or sick, right? The main four reasons people misbehave is they want attention, or they want power or they're feeling hurt so they do revenge or they feel so disconnected. They feel inadequate so they almost give up. So, there's kind of this range, it's attention and then power and then I don't have any connection, revenge, and then just kind of give up. You could almost see most misbehavior fall into those four categories for adults and children, like human beings. Kristina Supler: That's so interesting that the same tenants hold true for someone, regardless of whether they're five years old or 45 years old. Those root causes drive certain decisions and behavior. Susan Stone: Yeah. We all want to be loved. Is that the foundation at the end of the day? [crosstalk] I see by smiling, but our listeners can't see you. So I just wanted to say everybody's smiling and I hope you, listeners, are, too. Dodie Blomberg: What we find is when people feel like they belong, they behave better. Our behavior is better. When we don't feel like we belong, we can kind of misbehave and create mischief. Right? Kristina Supler: Kelly, a question I'm wondering for you, Susan and I and our law practice, we represent students of all ages across the country who are confronted with a variety of legal issues. Part of the group of students we serve in particular are children with special needs. So, if you could speak to, particularly for our parents or listeners out there with children who have special needs, does this approach work for that population? How might you be able to adapt it or apply it? Susan Stone: Right question Kristina. Kelly Pfeiffer: So it does because even children with special needs have that primary goal of belonging and significance, but their idea of how to belong and feel significant may look slightly different. We may have to do a little bit more detective work to see, "Oh, they do want attention." or "They are trying but they have some skill deficits that we're just not aware of. That's why the behavior ends up looking like this." So, the positive discipline are trying to look at the goal or mistaken goal behind the behavior and for special needs children, it may take a little bit of extra work and getting into their world. That can be challenging if they have communication deficits. Sometimes we're making guesses at first, as we're trying to solve problems with our children or figure out what their mistaken goal is. When they can commu…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    COVID Slide: The Impact of the Pandemic on Students & Education Sep 02, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Erin Herbruck and Ali Weiss Trotter to talk about how COVID has impacted our students, both socially and academically, in a phenomenon being called the COVID slide. TRANSCRIPT: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk with Susan Stone and Kristina Supler. we're full-time moms and attorneys bringing our student defense legal practice to life with real candid conversations. Today's topic is COVID slide. It's the beginning of the school year. And we're here to talk about how COVID has impacted our students, both socially and academically. We have two very special guests, Dr. Erin Herbruck and Ali Weiss Trotter. Kristina, can you tell us about our special guests? Kristina Supler: Sure. We're so pleased to be joined by Dr. Herbruck. She's a seasoned educator at the Shaker Heights schools. She has over 20 years of experience working in education. Ali Weiss Trotter also has over 20 years of experience working as a licensed clinical social worker. Ali is the director of admissions and community outreach at Bellefaire JCB. And she also sees patients, and young patients, in her private practice at the Organization for Psychological Health. We're so pleased to have both of you join us today. And before we jump in, can you tell us a little bit about your professional experience that lends itself to talking about today's topic, COVID slide? Dr. Erin Herbruck: I'm happy to go first. Susan Stone: Great. [crosstalk 00:01:28] Thank you, Erin. Kristina Supler: Please. Dr. Erin Herbruck: Absolutely. So I've spent the past 28 years in public education, and spent many years as a middle school teacher, and have spent about the past 13 years as a central office administrator. I have a background in psychology and a doctorate in urban education. And so my background experiences have involved a lot of work with students, with families, with adults, the teachers, the staff, the principals in our school districts. Kristina Supler: Perfect. And Ali, what about you? Ali Weiss Trotter: So similar to Erin, I've been in the field for about 28 years. I worked in the community mental health field for most of my career, focusing on mental illness and developmental disabilities. I've primarily worked with children, adolescents, and their families. And in addition to doing some administrative work, I'm currently providing direct clinical service to children and adolescents in my private practice. Susan Stone: Your backgrounds are both going to lend themselves, I know, to a great talk today. And I want to make sure we're all on the same page with our definitions. I understand the term COVID slide to describe the educational and social regression that has occurred during this pandemic. From the articles I read, it seems like the normal regression students have over the summer we expect, and this is a regression on steroids. Erin, is this real, or am I reading about something just to scare parents out there? Dr. Erin Herbruck: There's some merit in the idea. The one interesting thing to think about is that everyone is experiencing this. There are different levels of regression over the summer, and there are different levels of regression based on this unique pandemic situation that we're in. I think the biggest difference between the summer regression that we see and this one, was the fact that the current situation with COVID lent itself to basically everyone being put in the same situation of being inside, unable to do things. Dr. Erin Herbruck: One of the biggest difference between summer regression that we often see is some kids get experiences that lend themselves to educational growth. Getting to go to museums, getting to go to do things like that while others maybe do not. And so I think that this has lent itself to be a little bit, interestingly enough, of an equalizer of regression because everyone has been at home. Although there are digital divide issues that certainly play a role. Kristina Supler: I know certainly speaking from the student population that Susan and I are working with, the kids who have been, unfortunately cooped up at home, trying to stay safe and socially distance throughout the pandemic. It seems like we are really in the midst of a mental health crisis. This has just been such a challenging time for everyone, but particularly for the little ones. So Ali, I'm wondering in your work at Bellefaire and in your private practice, what have you seen in terms of COVID's impact on students and mental health issues? I mean, what's your take on this? Ali Weiss Trotter: So when we have seen an impact. In fact, it's more significant than we would have ever hoped. There's been a significant increase in anxiety and depression among children and adolescents. And there's concerns about re-entry into school, and into the school setting. Social isolation was really common during the pandemic, which sort of leads itself to the impact of what it's going to look like when these individuals go back to school. And a large majority of the children and adolescents that are being referred right now currently to therapists, unfortunately is due to the effects of the pandemic. So we are definitely seeing an increase in mental health issues related. Susan Stone: I want to ping pong the question back to Erin. How are schools, now that school's starting, going to deal with this crisis? Dr. Erin Herbruck: Well, it is all hands on deck in our schools. And I can speak specifically to what I'm experiencing as a leader and an educator in my school district. We are investing more time than ever on our social and emotional learning in our classrooms, spending time re acclimating to how you interact with other people, how you, use of space. And then there are some other variables that go into all of that now with where we are with the Delta variant. Dr. Erin Herbruck: But just teaching kids again about how to … The repetition and the routines of school are being taught to some students. If you think about it, it's very fascinating. Our students who are going into or starting second grade this year, have really not had a true educational experience for a complete year. Some of them haven't been in a school in either their kindergarten or their first grade year. So beyond even any of the academic priorities that we have, common core standards, mastery of content. We have so much more to do about reiterating how you work and how you exist and how you work together with others in schools, adults and students. Susan Stone: So is a second grader, socially, emotionally … The rising second graders. Are they second graders or are they back to being almost like a kindergartner? How far is the slide back? Dr. Erin Herbruck: I mean, certainly it depends on every student and every situation. The thing to think about though, is everyone's kind of that step back. So I think we're going to have to kind of recalibrate what we think of developmentally, and where kids should be for a while. Because it's almost like we have to think a year or so back, of where we might expect them to be. And that's the new, quote, normal for a developmental student. As a second grader, maybe is socially and emotionally more, and academically more similar to a first grader. And it's not that we didn't do amazing things during remote learning, and the challenges of concurrent learning. Many kids thrive in that because of social situations that they're in that makes this online learning even better for them, but still, it's definitely different. Kristina Supler: It's interesting, this talk of second graders. Because my son's a rising second grader. And as we're gearing up for back to school, I'm thinking that he hasn't had the real, quote unquote, normal excitement leading up to school, and reflecting back on memories. This is really in many respects, his first go at this. So, fingers crossed. We'll see how this year goes. But Ali, my question for you, with all this talk about the Delta variant, this is some scary stuff, scary information that we're working through, on how to be safe and how to have children safe at school in classrooms. We're hoping for, again, the quote unquote, normal school year. But my question is how can parents talk to their children about COVID safety, the Delta variant, in a real way, but also without terrifying their children? And particularly children who might already be very anxious. What suggestions do you have? Ali Weiss Trotter: Right. So my first suggestion would be to let the children talk to the parents. Often, parents will dismiss fears. In the mental health world, our recommendation would be to listen to the fears and validate them. We don't always have the answers. The unfortunate reality is that none of us really know. And we can't lie to the kids about that, right? So we just have to help them shift their negative thought patterns, get them into more positive thinking, give them coping skills. Parents and teachers both, really, should share their own coping skills with kids. Because I think we are all in the same boat. None of us know what's happening. We don't know if this is the second variant or the second of 24 variants. So I really would suggest, especially for younger students, limit their access to the news. Ali Weiss Trotter: The news is scary. No one young should be watching the news regularly. There's just too much information, too many statistics, too much detail that can be really alarming to kids and adults. I think I'm equally as alarmed, often when I watched the news. And I also think actually, piggybacking on what Erin said, is that routine is key. Creating routines for kids. I think the kids going back to school is ideal. Whether they're in masks, out of masks, whether people are getting sick, not getting sick, having the day-to-day predictable routine is going to eliminate some of that anxiety naturally. So I am in full support of the kids going back. I think that teachers and parents need to be vigilant, and watch for the fears and anxieties and address them. Susan Stone: Ali, Kristina and I deal with two issues more and more lately. And Kristina, I want to know if you agree. But we deal with two camps. One, especially with older, either high school aged students or college students that they're so anxious. They're telling their parents that they don't want to go back to school. Or the parents try to make appointments for them to see therapists, and they don't want to go to the therapist. And we'll say, well, they have to go. What do you do for the kid that needs the support, needs the structure, needs the routine like you just talked about, but doesn't want to do it? Ali Weiss Trotter: I think that that's one of the biggest concerns in the mental health world, is for college age, high school age is school refusal and truancy. There's so much fear around getting sick, around the pandemic, the virus. A lot of it is just solid communication between professionals and parents. It is very hard right now to find a good therapist. The wait lists are extensive. Susan Stone: We know. Ali Weiss Trotter: I know it's ridiculous. The wait lists are miles long. I always recommend to parents to talk to their pediatricians, because they sometimes have resources or know of resources that others don't. Go through your insurance. People should go through their insurance companies. You log into your insurance company and you type in what your preference is, whether it's a female therapist, a male therapist, young, whatever. And you can find lots and lots of, of people. It's not easy. I will say that being involved with the school-based mental health program in my day-to-day work, in Cuyahoga County, almost every school building has a mental health professional. Parents need to talk to the schools. They need to talk to the professionals at schools. Because there are resources available, in colleges as well, in universities as well. Connecting your kid to the mental health clinic at school before they even enter is highly recommended. Kristina Supler: So this point about resources being available. I'm interested to hear from you, Erin. Do you, in your professional experience and looking back from what we know at this point about how last year unfolded for students, was there a difference in the quality of education and the delivery of education during the pandemic, between public schools and private schools? Or do you feel, what would you say in terms of, if there was this divide for students from perhaps wealthier families, versus students perhaps in homes where there is no internet or extra computer. And the struggle to even log on and connect. We hear stories, but what would you say about how that really played out? Dr. Erin Herbruck: Well, I think the unique thing about education is that everyone is looking for what's best for their own child. So whether it's public or private, everyone, every parent is trying to do what's best for their child. So I think that we could kind of split everything, every experience that kids had in private schools and public schools and every different kind of private school, and every different kind of public school. We could split it all up, and we'd probably find the scattergram to be all over the place in terms of what was available. What I do know is that when the parents and the kids felt supported, felt comfortable, felt like their child was able to learn in a safe environment, that students were learning. So if that, to a family meant that my child went into school every day in a private school that was able to do that, and they … I'm just making up stories now. Didn't have to wear a mask and they were safe and all that good stuff, they got a fine education. Dr. Erin Herbruck: At the same time, students who were at home using completely remote learning who were engaged and got on and did what they needed to do, they also had a great experience. So I don't know if there's a set answer that students in private schools or public schools got better or worse experiences. It's very individualized. And I've talked to parents personally in the past year, who both found that the remote learning, especially in my district, the remote learning was amazing for their kid. And others who said it was awful. Dr. Erin Herbruck: And then the same thing with kids coming to school because of the. Because of the pandemic, there are kids who came in and thrived in the school setting when we returned. And other kids who, because for many reasons such as issues that have to do with mental health and safety, that they did not do well and really would have thrived in the other one. So I understand that that's really a non-answer to what you're asking, but I truthfully believe that there's such a wide range, and that any person you talk to would say, either they had a great experience or they did not, relative of whether it was private or public. Ali Weiss Trotter: The other thing too, can I chime in really quickly? Susan Stone: [crosstalk 00:16:52] Yeah. I would love it. Ali Weiss Trotter: From the mental health side, because Bellefaire is involved in 72 programs, school districts in Cuyahoga county, one being Erin's district. What we were so impressed with was every district's rushed and urgency to get kids, the technology they needed. So even the families who could not afford internet, could not afford Chromebooks or laptops or any other sorts of technology, that was brought in from the districts to the students. And whe…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Needs Trust: Planning for Children With Disabilities May 04, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by KJK Estate Planning Partner Erika Apelis to discuss special needs trusts and how they can help parents with proper financial planning for their children with disabilities, including autism.


    Intervention for Students with Special Needs Feb 15, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, KJK Student & Athlete Defense Attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Jaclynn Bosley, owner and executive clinical director of Thrive Early Learning Center, to discuss intervention and therapy strategies for children with special needs. In particular, they address Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and other therapy for students on the autism spectrum, as well as regression among students due to the pandemic.

    TELL US ABOUT YOURSELF AND YOUR CAREER PATH.

    I am a licensed Ohio Principal, Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) & Certified Ohio Behavior Analyst (COBA). I started my career at the Lerner School for Autism at the Cleveland Clinic, Worked as a Special Education Supervisor for Riverside Local Schools, was a Behavioral Consultant and Director of Program Development at KidsLink and am now the Owner of Thrive Early Learning Center.

    CAN YOU TELL US WHY YOU STARTED THRIVE AND WHAT IS THE MISSION?

    Our slogan says it all: PLAY. LEARN. DISCOVER. THRIVE! Our mission at Thrive is to provide comprehensive, early intervention to young children on the spectrum, but to do so using a naturalized, play–based model.

    WHAT TYPES OF STUDENTS ATTEND YOUR SCHOOL AND WHAT ARE THEIR ISSUES?

    Students who attend our program are those who have an autism diagnosis, a related developmental diagnosis or those who are not yet diagnosed but are demonstrating symptoms that would respond well to this type of intervention model.

    WHAT IS ABA THERAPY AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?

    ABA stands for Applied Behavior Analysis and it is the "Gold Standard" of therapeutic models. ABA has the most research (over 70 years!) behind it and has proven to demonstrate improvements across all ages and levels across the autism spectrum. It is important when looking into interventions for your child that you look to only those that are based on research, and this is because being that autism is a language-based disorder, our children are often unable to report back to us (or report in detail) their thoughts/feelings/perceptions about what they are participating in. So, it cannot be overstated that we must use methodologies that we know have positive outcomes that are predictable and safe.

    WHAT OTHER INTERVENTIONS DOES THRIVE EARLY LEARNING CENTER PROVIDE?

    Our early childhood program combines ABA, direct speech therapy, direct occupational therapy and direct behavior analytic services all in one. This is different than the traditional therapy models of clinic-based ABA in isolation, speech in isolation or OT in isolation. That model lacks the consistency and generalization that Thrive offers. Our Behavior Technicians are in therapy while the student is receiving speech or OT services, so that those skills can be taught to our behavior technicians to provide that intervention in those areas across all areas of play and learning throughout the day!

    CAN AN AUTISTIC STUDENT RECEIVE A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) IF THEY DON'T GET ABA AT SCHOOL AND JUST RECEIVE SPEECH THERAPY?

    Loaded question. Every child's needs are so different that it is very difficult to just answer that with a solidified "yes" or "no." What I can tell you is that children on the spectrum have very complex needs, and while much of what causes the complexities for our kids is speech/language related, this often manifests itself behaviorally (because of the communication frustration). So, while addressing the language needs is incredibly important, we also have to understand fully from a behavioral perspective why the behavior is occurring and how to address that need. That is where receiving ABA is so helpful, because children on the spectrum tend to demonstrate improvements when all areas are addressed, not just language in isolation. Also, ABA lends itself to "teaching the teacher," not just the student. So, we often see that when the teachers are using solid behavioral principles, the overall responsiveness from the student so greatly improves. That part is something that cannot be addressed by speech services alone!

    JACKIE – I SEE FROM YOUR LITERATURE THAT THE KIDS AT THRIVE HAVE IEPS. CAN YOU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN WHAT AN IEP IS AND HOW IT'S DEVELOPED?

    An IEP is an Individualized Education Plan. The IEP is the document that guides the educational team on what services and goals will be provided to your child based on their individual learning needs. In order to get an IEP for your child, he or she must first be evaluated by the school team and identified as a child with a disability. This process is known as the ETR. The ETR identifies where the child's deficit areas are (learning, speech, motor, etc.) and then the IEP is developed based on these results. So, the ETR identifies the deficit area, and the IEP documents how the team plans on helping your child grow in those areas. These are all completed through your local school district, and the evaluation can occur no earlier than age 3.

    SINCE THRIVE EARLY LEARNING CENTER IS A PRESCHOOL, HOW DO YOU TRANSITION THE KIDS TO GRADE SCHOOL? CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT A TRANSITION PLAN IS AND HOW IS IT ACCOMPLISHED FOR YOUR STUDENTS?

    The purpose of the transition plan is to work as closely with the incoming team from the school district as possible to create a plan that outlines how to transition the student from highly individualized and intensive instruction over to the public school model (and these models vary from district to district). It begins by reducing some of the more intensive supports that we provide in our setting and doing this systematically over time. For example, students will begin working with another student and one teacher (so 2:1 ratio) and working in larger classroom spaces that naturally have more distractions. Additionally, students are taught to be much more independent such as traveling throughout the building independently, and are able to unpack their belongings, get lunch items, pack up for dismissal, etc. Then, as the physical transition draws closer, we may make recommendations that the school personnel will either come here to Thrive to spend time getting to know and work with the student, or that we do the reverse and Thrive staff attend school services in the public school setting. This helps create a "bridge" of sorts so that the student can get adjusted over time and that the new staff learn the child and their needed supports. It makes it a more comfortable transition for everyone when we set the child (and the staff!) up for success!

    WE HAVE BATTLED WITH SCHOOLS ABOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PROPER IEP FOR STUDENTS WITH AUTISTM. IN YOUR EXPERIENCE, WHAT SHOULD PARENTS KNOW THAT THEIR STUDENT SHOULD HAVE AFTER LEAVING PRE-SCHOOL AND ENTERING GRADE SCHOOL IN TERMS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES?

    I would strongly encourage parents to request an observation of the classroom(s) well in advance of the IEP/transition. It's very important for parents to physically see WHAT and HOW children are being taught. When an IEP goal/objective is developed, it will not list a curriculum or teaching methodology. So, while you may agree on the goal, as a parent you really don't know how the child will get there. By physically seeing how the classroom is set up and functions, you can get a feel for how your child's learning time will be spent. Take notes while you are there: who is providing the instruction (teacher or the aide?) How much free time do the students have? What are they doing in their leisure time? Are students working independently in work stations on file folders and TEACCH boxes, or is the intervention interactive and does it provide modeling, rehearsal of skills and feedback? The "HOW" (way in which it's taught) is often much more meaningful than the WHAT (the goal/objective) alone.

    SINCE THE PANDEMIC, HAVE YOU SEEN A LOT OF REGRESSION IN STUDENTS?

    Unfortunately, yes – in academic performance, but more importantly there has also been regression in behavioral skills and life skills. Being at home all the time has created such difficulty for our students. It blurs the line between learning and leisure and has forced our parents to put on a whole new set of hats, which is stressful for parents and children alike. Students are not used to having mom or dad be their teacher, their speech pathologist, their occupational therapist, their classroom aide, etc. So, it is not uncommon to see the undesirable behaviors spike as a strong message of "NO, THANK YOU! School should not be my classroom and Mom should not be my teacher!" It's hard for everyone.

    DO YOU THINK THAT THE REGRESSION SHOULD BE ADDRESSED WITH COMPENSATORY SERVICES AND WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK LIKE? TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT COMPENSATORY SERVICES ARE FIRST?

    Compensatory services are provided when a child has missed a significant portion of services, usually due to absence. In a more typical year, compensatory services would be provided for a student who missed a lot of school due to medical issues, for example. This year, with services being unable to be provided (or at least provided adequately), it could absolutely be justified that additional services be requested by the family. Depending on the district, they may or may not be so flexible in discussing this as an option. They may say that they offered the services, but if your child has demonstrated an inability to benefit (or even participate) at all from the virtual services, then it should at least be discussed at a minimum.

    LIKEWISE, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT ESY IS AND WHETHER YOUR STUDENTS NEED SUMMER SERVICES TO PREVENT REGRESSION?

    ESY refers to extended school year. ESY services are detailed in section 4 of the IEP. You and your child's educational team will determine whether your child qualifies for extended school year. There are a few options for qualifying. One of them is compensatory services, one of them is regression and recoupment and the final qualifier is nature and severity of the disability. Many of my students qualify for ESY under this category, in that their diagnosis of autism and their presenting profile often justify the need for consistent services throughout the summer months. The majority of my students are on toilet training programs and participate in behavioral reduction programs for very interfering behaviors. Not addressing those for a typical 10 week summer would have significant negative impact on the child's functioning and independence.

    JACKIE- PARENTS HIRE OUR LAW FIRM WHEN THEY DON'T BELIEVE THAT A PUBLIC SCHOOL CAN SERVICE THEIR AUTISTIC STUDENT AND THEY REQUIRE A PRIVATE PLACEMENT, SUCH AS MONARCH OR LERNER OR EVEN RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PLACEMENTS FOR OLDER, AUTISTIC STUDENTS. WHAT IS YOUR OPINION AS TO WHEN A STUDENT NEEDS A PRIVATE PLACEMENT VERSUS STAYING AT THEIR PUBLIC SCHOOL AND RECEIVING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES?

    In having done this over two decades and also having had the opportunity of working in both the private sector and in public school, I think that what really needs to be assessed in making that decision is this: Is the child's time at school at a level of productivity that progress (albeit even slow progress) is continually being made? When progress is stagnant, other options need to be explored – even if the child isn't highly behavioral. I think there is a false notion that the only children that should be placed out of district are those with severe behavioral needs, and that isn't true. In both cases, it is important to have a highly qualified person (such as a BCBA) come in and assess the situation and provide recommendations on how to improve the situation so that progress can be reinstated. If, after that happens, the staff are still unable to demonstrate that progress is happening (and we assess this through the data), then it is time to explore other educational options.

    WE HAVE DEFENDED STUDENTS FOR VARIOUS STUDENT CONDUCT VIOLATIONS AND HAD TO GO TO MANIFESTATION HEARINGS, AND AT THE HEARING WE HAVE ARGUED THAT THE STUDENT DID NOT HAVE A PROPER BEHAVIOR PLAN. AS A BCBA, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS, WHAT IS A PROPER BEHAVIOR PLAN AND HOW CAN YOU DETERMINE WHETHER A BEHAVIOR ARISES OUT OF THE DISABILITY OR IS JUST BREAKING SCHOOL POLICY?

    There is an automatic notion that individuals with a disability are always acting out on purpose – as a means to some self-serving end. This is just not true. This is why we need a thorough FBA conducted by a qualified BCBA. This process is to determine the function of why a behavior is occurring, and then to develop a behavioral intervention plan that addresses this behavior from a functional perspective. A quality FBA defines in detail what problem behavior is being demonstrated, the data that shows how often the behavior is occurring (this may also include how long the behavior occurs for, ex: refusal to work), what is likely to happen before the behavior is demonstrated (antecedents) and what happens during and after the behavior occurs as well (consequences).

    But a solid FBA also goes further. It doesn't just list these things on a paper. Many times, I will get called to do an independent FBA and I review what the district has already done and next to the antecedents column, a teacher writes in "none" or the teacher writes "gave the student a worksheet- he got mad and had a meltdown." A true FBA doesn't include subjective opinions (i.e. "he got mad") or use terminology that is vague ("meltdown"). A true FBA investigates further. It includes indirect methods such as interviewing staff to ask clarifying questions and interviewing the family to get additional information that can serve as a setting event such as poor sleeping habits, or familial relationships. All of these factors are so important in truly understanding the "why" and addressing it properly. An objective and quality FBA will help determine underlying or internal factors that contribute to the acting out behavior. When we understand those more readily, we can create behavior plans that address the whole person's needs and identify the positive behaviors that we must teach in replacement.


    Technology Addiction: The Growing Dangers for Students Jan 12, 2021
    Show notes

    In this episode of Real Talk, Student & Athlete Defense attorneys Susan Stone and Kristina Supler are joined by Dr. Jay Berk, a psychologist who specializes in electronic addition, to discuss the dangers of technology for students and how it can lead to school problems, issues with anxiety and mental health and criminal issues. Dr. Berk also shares insight into the trends he is seeing regarding sexting, and advises parents about when technology use crosses the line into addiction. TRANSCRIPT: Susan Stone: Welcome back to Real Talk With Susan & Kristina. And today, we are going to be talking about how an abuse of technology by students can lead to school problems and actual criminal issues. Today, we welcome to explore this issue, Dr. Jay Berk. Welcome, Jay. Jay Berk: Thank you for having me guys. Good to see you. Hope everybody's staying safe. Susan Stone: Yeah. We hope so too. Kristina, before we start questioning Dr. Berk, can you give an overview to our listeners about what we've been seeing in our practice? Kristina Supler: Sure. Our cases for years have entailed a real confluence between mental health issues among students as well as struggles with technology. And so, students come to us when they're in need of legal services for issues with special education and receiving services from a school district. Sometimes, student issues lead to criminal cases. And so, we've been pleased over the years to work with Dr. Berk, who's a national expert in this area of technology and helping students. Susan Stone: And Jay, I just have to mention to the listeners out there, do you realize we've been working together on different matters for almost eight years now? Jay Berk: That's a long time. Susan Stone: I know. Jay Berk: We're both getting older. That's what happens, huh? Susan Stone: Yeah. That is what happens. And I've really seen what you do change over time. When I first met with you, I remember our whole focus was on oppositional disorder, which is still your specialty, anxiety, depression. Moving into an expertise in students with autism. But really, in the last couple years, you've led your field in educating both other therapists and parents in the field of electronic addiction. So, we welcome you and we're grateful that we can collaborate with you basically because of your wealth of knowledge in so many areas. Jay Berk: Thanks. And I think what's important for listeners to know is it's an emerging area. There's more information coming out about it. The research is trailing. Actually, the practical pieces that need to be done. So, I'm involved around the planet at this point. There's a lot of information coming out of South Korea and other places for research. But looking at this because some countries were ahead of us in these challenges. And so, there is a little bit of a blueprint out there that's somewhat transferrable and sometimes not so transferrable. So, that's why I wrote the book Parent's Guide to Electronic Addiction. And looking at the aspects of what parents can do to prevent the problem, and then what to do if they're starting to see a problem, what to do if there's a really a big problem with kids. Jay Berk: And I think that's important to consider in the nature of our discussion today. There's different levels of this. Because a lot of people game fine. There's no big deal, kids just use it healthy. It's when it's a problem, technology becomes a real problem. I think the second thing that'd be helpful for parents to understand is that kids growing up today are digital natives. So, they know way more than the parents know about things. A lot of times kids tell me things about how to ride around the school system that I'm not even sure the school district knows. And the adults are chasing the kids on some of this information. And the games are changing too. Two years ago, Fortnite. Last year, Fortnite. This year, Among Us is the big happening game out there. So, it's moving as well. SEXTING AND THE TEENAGE BRAIN Kristina Supler: I know we've had in our practice… We had the pleasure of working with a fine young man who, in fact, shut down the whole IT system for a school district. Dr. Berk, let's take a turn into left field a bit, but it's all related. We have seen a tremendous rise in cases involving sexting. Let's talk about sexting. Is that something… First, I guess, can you share with our listeners what sexting is and what trends you're seeing among your student patients? Jay Berk: Well, I think that possibly a way to look at is to think about how kids see things today. So, a lot of the kids are saying, "Well, it's my body. And if I want to send this picture, that's up to me." And realizing… They don't really realize the legal implications associated with the choices they're making. Kids airdropping pictures in the cafeteria to other kids, kids forwarding pictures. And a lot of kids… And be it that they're teenagers most of the time. Frontal lobe development occurs until your age 25. They don't realize the long-term implications that later on, they're not going to want those pictures out there. Also, a lot of kids with social issues where the boyfriend or girlfriend will say, "I'm not going to show this to anybody. It's just for you and I." And then, all of a sudden they break up and it's not so between you and I anymore. And I would say those are some of the trends that are occurring. WHEN DOES A TYPICAL TEENAGER'S PREOCCUPATION WITH TECHNOLOGY BECOME A GENUINE TECHNOLOGY ADDICTION? Susan Stone: You mentioned that students today are digital natives and they need technology, especially during the pandemic, but even before to go to school, to communicate with their friends. At what point does a typical teenager's preoccupation with technology become a genuine addiction? Jay Berk: Yeah. That's a great question because I think parents really need to think about that. Let's start with how do you prevent having a problem? How do you prevent having a problem starts with the parents. We're doing a collaborative problem solving agreement with the kid about the use of technology. What are the rules around it? Where do they see it? Kristina Supler: Like a technology contract with your kids? Jay Berk: Yeah. Technology contract and more… I guess I would say technology agreement that everybody's philosophically on the same page of what this looks like. The most common question I get from parents is, "Well, how many hours a day should a kid be in technology?" Well, that's impossible to answer in today's world because they're Zooming all day, they're with their friends. It depends on what you're doing on technology to be able to answer that question. Now, according to the World Health Organization, who came out with the diagnostic criteria for gaming addiction, there is… You start to see things like loss of friendships, grade problems, up in the middle of the night, rage issues. When you're starting to see those things, that's where the kids starting to have a problem. They're starting to move from healthy gaming, into a zone of danger where they're starting to have these issues. The kids that are having the true addiction issues are the kids who are really failing in school, stealing money from their parents, that's a huge one, multiple times. Getting in trouble with the law because they're doing things that they shouldn't be doing online, et cetera, et cetera. And so, there's a continuum there that really moves along. Susan Stone: Just to be clear for parents out there, if you're a student who's on Zoom for five, six hours, and then who's talking on the phone, and then wants to play a game to unwind, how long would you allow or do you think is prescribed to put in that agreement? An hour? Jay Berk: I do it a little bit differently and I think this will be helpful for parents to understand. But begin back to what are they doing with the technology? Because right now we're in a pandemic. So, a lot of kids are saying, "Well, what else am I supposed to do?" And there is some merit to that because some parents aren't letting their kids socialize at all, some kids will let their parent go to the park with a friend, some kid's parents don't care, and the kid's over others kids houses. WHEN IT COMES TO TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET ADDICTION, QUALITY MATTERS MORE THAN QUANTITY Kristina Supler: Are you saying, Dr. Berk, it's not necessarily the time the student is interfacing with technology so much as in what way the interface is occurring? Jay Berk: Correct. It's not so simple as just saying, "Well, you get three hours a day." Now, I do say to parents… in my book, I put this info in there. I talk about pay-to-play. And the concept is, is that if you do other things that are healthy, for example, you exercise for an hour, you're on the treadmill doing stuff, or you do things for charity, you do other social things, then you can gain extra technology time because there's a balance. And I think that's important to think about. Now, let's say the kid has social anxiety and they're online playing Among Us, but they're with local kids making friends. Am I going to limit that? Well, I've got to, again, look at what is that kid doing now? Now, can they spin that into getting together with those local kids? Are they playing Among Us with a kid in England that they're never going to get to know? And that's why I say that it's more sophisticated than just that simple answer. Kristina Supler: [Concerning] a kid's preoccupation with technology, have you seen instances where it actually causes the child to lose social skills? Jay Berk: Yes. We can think about some categories of kids for a minute. Example of kids with ADHD tend to play first-person shooter games. They play first-person shooter games because they like the dopamine rush off those games. Okay. The kid that's hacking the school district is getting a rush of getting the power to do but the school doesn't think they can do. Hackers like the challenge, i.e., we just got hacked by some government, I won't know who it is, in United States and what are they doing with that info? And there's people that just like the challenge of hacking. So, that's part of what we want to think about. Now, kids on the spectrum would be another example. Kristina Supler: I was going to ask about autism and how that factors in. Jay Berk: Kids on the spectrum. For example, if the kid has a high interest in bugs like I have, my caseload, or kid has as a high interest in model railroads, well, it could be good because you can find other people on a server that have an interest in bugs or model railroad. Now, the problem becomes that could be good but it also can become so easy. Why should I talk to anybody else when I only want to talk about bugs and I can instantly hop online with the phone in my pocket and find people that will talk about bugs until the end of time? Susan Stone: Kristina and I have represented a number of college students on the spectrum who use the various social media platforms to actually stalk students that they're interested in. And then, it blows up in a college disciplinary action. Can you describe the different… And we've touched on it but what are you seeing today as behavior that leads to you having to give a lawyer a call, whether it's us or another firm, for criminal behavior? Jay Berk: Usually, to be honest with you and forthright about this answer, I have told the parents, or the kid, or the college-aged kid where the problem lies before it probably hits the attorney's door. Kristina Supler: So you can see that often because you are… From the clinical perspective as a psychologist, you sense a storm is brewing? Jay Berk: Right. Or they come to me because the storm hit and they're in trouble. Kristina Supler: Got it. Susan Stone: What kind of storms are you seeing? Tell us about those stories. DESENSITIZATION & DISSOCIATION ONLINE CAN HAVE CONSEQUENCES IRL Jay Berk: Kids, for example, making threats online towards other people that they say was joking or was only meant between them and the other person. And all of a sudden, when you look at that data, from a different eyes, they don't understand how other people might see that. Number two is I've had kids, a lot of kids at college… Everybody's had a crush and things like that. But with social media, you can find out about anything about anybody. And it's like even if you're blocked, they get the social media connection from somebody else who's unblocked, or you could just change your name or your account and move around so easily. It's amazing the things that people can do. There's so much information out there that you can get. I mean, i.e., if you look at… Seeing things going on in the United States parallel, some of the people in government that had been threatened and people found out where they live, where their house is, what church they go to, their availability of information if you know how to use it is pretty crazy. Now, we're dealing with, a lot of times, really smart, savvy people that underestimate the implications of the choices they're making. Susan Stone: It's like a blind spot. Jay Berk: It is. I would say most of the kids are young adults, that I deal with, did not go into this situation thinking that what they were doing was criminal or going to be a problem. Kristina Supler: I mean, you talked about parents having an agreement with their children and expectations for technology use, and sounds like maybe incentivizing them, the children, if you do this, this and this, then you can have more screen time. But I guess my question is, is there anything that parents can really do to head off at the past any technology struggle before it becomes a really big issue? Jay Berk: Yeah. There's a number of things. This will sound crazy but let me give you some really practical stuff. One is, The Beatles came and everybody's like, "Oh, my gosh. The world's going to fall apart." The Beatles, it's going… the world's going crazy. Okay. Electronics and games are out there. So maybe, you got to learn a couple of Beatles songs. In other words, sit down with your kid and watch him play or play with them a little bit on the games, know what they're playing and know that games and things are rated away for a reason. Okay. I was doing an NPR story once, and that was pretty interesting, doing NPR radio, and one of the questions was. "My six-year old's having problems in his behavior and he's playing Fortnite. Do you think that might be a problem?" And it's like, "Yeah. Look at the rating on Fortnite for games." So, be aware that the games are rated certain ways for certain reasons. I think sit down with the kid, watch what they're playing, be aware of… If you want to be amazed as a parent, put on the kid's headphones and listen to the trash talk that's going on on Xbox Live or something like that. So teaching your kid, "All right. If you're playing the games and somebody's trash-talking, what do you do with it? How do you manage that?" Okay. Be aware of who you're playing with. So for example, if you're playing Among Us, are you playing with just people you know? From school, church, temple or something? Are you playing with anybody's in there and if somebody's not following the rules, what d…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 4 5 6 7 8 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights