TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    History

    The Partial Historians

    Join Dr Rad and Dr G as we discuss, spar, and laugh our way through different aspects of the ancient Roman world! Our main series ‘From the Foundation of the City’ follows Roman history year by year from the traditional foundation date of 753 BCE. We also interview academics and specialists from around the globe for their insights into history and the representation of Rome and the ancient Mediterranean in popular culture. Dr Fiona Radford is an expert on Rome on film and wrote her thesis on Kubrick’s Spartacus. Dr Radford is exponent of not only Ancient History, but also Reception Studies. Dr Peta Greenfield is an expert on the Vestal Virgins. Dr Greenfield’s research interests include: religion and politics in Rome, the late republic and Augustan period, and the role of women.


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © The Partial Historians

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 146 - Nobody Calls Me Chicken Jan 11, 2024
    Show notes

    In this episode, the people of Antium start provoking the Aequians and the Volscians into war with Rome by calling them COWARDS. How else could they respond but to say, “Nobody calls me chicken!”Episode 146 – Nobody Calls Me Chicken!With the Antiates, Volscians and Aequians ganged up against them, the Romans decide it’s time for a dictator! Not all of the military tribunes were terribly happy with this decision. Ahala seems to have been the only magistrate who could put the state before his own ambitions.As a reward for being such a dazzling military tribune, Ahala was chosen to serve as master of the horse, the assistant to the dictator.Leaving his grumbling colleagues behind, Ahala and the dictator headed off to face the foe.Tune in to hear how the Romans fare against THREE of their rivals.Want to revisit a previous clash with Antium? Check out Episode 99 – Tusculum and Antium.Things to Look Out For: Dodgy election tacticsWhingy military tribunes with consular powerPatricians resorting to incredibly desperate measuresSmug tribunes of the plebsDr G having a small identity crisisArmpit fartsA mosaic of roosters fighting. Nobody calls them chicken! Courtesy of Amphipolis on Flickr.Our Players 408 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerC. Iulius Sp. f. Vopisci n. Iullus (Pat) Mil. Tr. c. p. 405P. Cornelius A. f. M. n. Cossus (Pat)C. Servilius P. f. Q. n. Ahala (Pat) Mil. Tr. c. p. 407, 402.DictatorP. Cornelius M. f. L. n. Rutilus Cossus (Pat) Mil. Tr. c. p. 405Master of the HorseC. Servilius P. f. Q. n. Ahala (Pat) Mil. Tr. c. p. 408, 407, 402Our SourcesDr G reads the Fasti Capitolini and Diodorus Siculus 13.104.1, 13.108.2, 13.109.Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.56.Bradley, G. 2020. Early Rome to 290 BC (Edinburgh University Press).Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Lomas, Kathryn (2018). The rise of Rome. History of the Ancient World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674919938. ISBN 978-0-674-65965-0. S2CID 239349186.Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects courtesy of Orange Free Sounds.Automated Transcript.This transcript was automatically generated by Otter AI. Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to the partial historians.Dr G 0:15We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:20Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad. AndDr G 0:30I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 1:04Hello, and welcome to a brand new episode of your favourite ancient Roman History podcast. The partial historians I am Dr. Radpsych it's a new year.I'm Dr. GDr Rad 1:30Excellent. And I am Dr Rad. I am a very confused little Dr Rad.Dr G 1:36I was just thinking, you know, new year we'll switch it up. We'll see if anybody notices you notice straight away though.Dr Rad 1:43Well, you know, it's a fairly distinctive name. I've had it all my life.Dr G 1:48Well, well, well.Dr Rad 1:52Well, welcome back. Dr. G. We are indeed in a new year. It's 2024.Dr G 1:57At time of recording, yes,Dr Rad 2:01it is a time of recording. And in terms of tracing the journey of room from the founding of the city. We had a very big episode last episode where we were talking about 409 BCE.Dr G 2:16Yeah, not only is this like the landmark year that marks this first century of the Roman Republic, but oh, boy, was it full of plebeian action.Dr Rad 2:28It was indeed, I believe that after some lengthy handwringing, and some classic conflict of the orders narrative, we did finally get a plebeian into the quaestorship.Dr G 2:42That's madness. It's crazy. I won't stand for it.Dr Rad 2:46Please, well, just going to end I mean, that's all equality ever really needs, isn't it?Dr G 2:51It's all over guys. I don't know how the patricians are going to hold up anymore. There's not enough fast cars or enough muscle to get them through this.Dr Rad 3:00They certainly did Look at it as a sign that the world was about to end,Dr G 3:04indeed, but I don't think it has fallen apart completely. Because we're here to talk about what happens after 409.Dr Rad 3:11We will the privilege maintain their position of privilege? Or will they have to concede more to whoever mysterious people that will be? And actually,Dr G 3:25I guess we'll find out. The other thing that's running parallel to this whole situation is what appears to be an expanded conflict with the Aequians and the Volscians. So Rome is going through a bit of a military upheaval.Dr Rad 3:39They are indeed I mean, we've talked about these guys on and off, you know, for a while now, but it does seem to be particularly flaring up at this point in the century.Dr G 3:51Indeed. So with that sort of background in place, I think we might be ready to step into 408 BC.Dr Rad 4:00408 BCE. Now, Dr. G, I'm presuming Dionysius is still keeping his distance from you.Dr G 4:27That man is hiding from me in his fragments, and I don't know what is going on.Dr Rad 4:33Oh, Dr. G, has no narrative source material once again. I'll bet you anything. She can tell us who the magistrates are for this year.Dr G 4:42Yeah, Look, I mean, it's not so bad. I can tell you things like who's who? I do have the Fasti Capitolini, which is the ultimate guide to who's who as far as most of us are concerned. And I have some little snippets from Diodorus Siculus as well. So we'll get to those in due course. Okay. Okay. But we start off with a year where military tribunes with consular power appear to have been voted in. Yes. And we have three of these guys this year. Yes, we have Gaius Iulius Vopisci Iullus. A patrician. We have Publius Cornelius Cossus a patrician. Yeah. And a Gaius Servilius Ahala, a patrician.Dr Rad 5:31Well, Dr. G, I can't say that I'm surprised. But given the way the patricians were carrying on last time, I really thought that maybe this was going to be the year when finally we were going to slee or see a plebeian elected into this position. But now, once again, I am amazingly disappointed.Dr G 5:53It's too soon. The quaestorship is one thing but how dare the plebeians attempt to make a grab for anything beyond this station?Dr Rad 6:02That's clearly what the patricians were worried about last episode, they thought that, you know, the quaestorship was, you know, just a stepping stone and it was all going to be downhill from here, as far as they were concerned, whereas for the plebeians it seemed to be very much uphill from here.Dr G 6:16There does seem to be a sense in which there might be multiple issues at play, though, because usually, when the patricians become quite scared of plebeians rising in influence and power in an official capacity, they opt for the consulship as a deliberate move, to lock out plugins. So we've got this kind of understanding that's given to us through our annalistic sources. Obviously, there are some question marks there. But the consulship is still the preserve of the leads, and that if a plebeian were to get into a high position, that would include a military command, it would be as a military tribute with consular power. That's, that's one of the rationales that's been put forward for why this position developed in the first place. Yeah. And yet, on the back of 409, where we see a rise in plebeians coming into the quaestorship, we now see that 408 has military tribunes with consular power. So is it there's military issues on the horizon that Rome is concerned about, and they're going to take a risk because they haven't opted for the consulship? Here.Dr Rad 7:24Now, remember that last episode, that was a point of contention, and the patricians were dead against this idea, because of the reasons you have outlined, but at least I suppose the plebeians had the opportunity. Someone elected once again and yet, didn't take it. It'sDr G 7:44like how you had your chances, plebeians and yet fluffed it?Dr Rad 7:49Well, I mean, Look, this is where we have to get back to the voting system, of course, as far as we can understand it, which of course, we may not be able to, because we may not really have an accurate record of what exactly was happening in order to get elected at this point in time. But I think we've talked before about the fact that the voting system is also rigged against people who are poor. Now, plebeians aren't necessarily poor. That is, but if we're talking about there being a more nuanced class divide, as we have before, where you may have wealthy plebeians who are actually voting along with patricians because their interests actually align more with the wealthy, regardless of whether they're patrician or plebeians, and then you've got maybe a sizable group of plebeians who aren't as economically stable or whatever. Yeah, that might lead to issues in the voting system, which might have been simplified over time. That's one possible way of looking at it.Dr G 8:53For sure, and I think this is the sort of thing where networking and your allegiances through society become one of those things as well. The patricians have a very particular network. And I would say that the plebeians are probably trying to build those kinds of networks, but maybe aren't necessarily getting themselves across the line with the amount of influence they need for these electoral processes to work out in their favour. Oh,Dr Rad 9:19absolutely. And that's really I think, what this whole suppose and conflict of the orders is all about really, it's not really about whether you're patrician and plebeian in a sense, it's about the level of privilege that you have and the amount of opportunities that are open to you. Hmm,Dr G 9:34well, on that note, yeah, not only do we have military attributes with consular power, but I have to assume that something does happen this year. Because we also get a dictator and their companion a master of the horse. So Publius Cornelius Rutilus Cossus Hmm, possibly a relation of the military tribune with consular power, Publius Cornelius Cossus.Dr Rad 10:08Disturbingly similar,Dr G 10:09very similar, very similar. It comes into the dictatorship. Now, I'm assuming that you might be able to tell me the story about how and why that will come about. Oh,Dr Rad 10:22live, you might have told me a thing or two.Dr G 10:25Well, well, well. And he also brings with him one of the military tributes with constellar power, guys. Servilius Ahala, the armpit brings him across from that roll into being his master of the horse, justDr Rad 10:41in case people haven't listened to that episode, which was a while ago. Now. She's not just calling this guy in here. It's not like a horrible slur. That's what made me that'sDr G 10:52that's definitely yeah, I'm just running with the Latin guys. Yeah. Yeah. Well, let's put the armpit in power. Sure. Why not?Dr Rad 11:01Well, this is interesting, actually. Because I mean, if we go back in time, briefly, Dr. G, it wasn't Ahala. He was involved in a very dramatic series. I can't even remember how long ago it was, was it last year? Was it even the year before? I think I think it might have been the year before 2022, that we were talking about the Ahala that really put this family on the math? Yes,Dr G 11:24I think it's around about 439. BCE, or 431, somewhere in there, at least, nearly 20 years ago, by Roman standards, and maybe a couple of years ago by our own.Dr Rad 11:37And it kind of makes sense that this family is, you know, starting to creep back into the records a little bit because just to give everyone a very brief overview, the Ahala that we enjoyed talking about so much before, was involved in the scandal around the nacho king of RomeDr G 11:54Spurius Maelius. Yes, yeah,Dr Rad 11:57there was this whole issue. To be honest, we couldn't really figure out what on earth was going on. But it kind of seemed like an attempt by someone who wasn't from the patrician class to curry favour, or, or he was maybe given power, and the patricians were like, oh, hell, either way, this guy ended up being essentially murdered in broad daylight. And the guy that seems to have done the murdering was Ahala. Well,Dr G 12:23and there's some speculation that he got his name from that moment, because he had gone into the forum with a hidden weapon under his arm.Dr Rad 12:32Indeed, indeed. And the upshot of that was that he had to leave room. It's interesting that he's, I mean, this isn't the same guy, obviously.Dr G 12:43No, but the family is clearly back. Yes, but yeah, definitelyDr Rad 12:47after that whole incident and the leaving of room and that sort of thing. We definitely didn't mention that name, you know, for a while, but now it's starting to creep back in a little bit.Dr G 12:57Yeah, they've returned and they ready to take their place in the top tier of political spots.Dr Rad 13:03They have spawned a generation has passed in Roman times.Dr G 13:07So what does happen this year? How do we get a dictator please tell me I've like I've been like tenterhooks of suspense being like, Oh, I got two names.Dr Rad 13:18What an excellent question. Well, let's go back to the elections for a moment, shall we? This question of military Tribune with consular power. So Livy very smugly says that although technically, in 409, the plebs won the battle to have elections for military Tribunes, rather than consuls as you outlined for the various reasons. The patricians were the real winners in the end, because of course, only patricians got elected. Ha, ha, ha. actually knew I need to make that more upper class. Chortle Chorle Chortle.Dr G 13:50I was gonna say, I would like you need to be holding a glass of whiskey give me Oh,Dr Rad 13:54I definitely am. I sparked up a Cuban. Yeah, so obviously, we have our tribunes he got elected. So the way that the way that this happened, it wasn't just what we've seen before, which is that Livy keeps telling me that, well, sure the plebeians are technically able to elect a fellow clap to this position. But why would they? I mean, how can they be persuaded to do that when there are all these amazing blue blooded candidates standing out there that dazzled by the blue blood, Dr. G, and the diamonds on the soles of their shoes? Well,Dr G 14:29Look, I mean, if somebody had diamonds on the soles of their shoes, I would be bamboozled.Dr Rad 14:33So instead, what had happened in this particular case, is that the patricians being worried obviously, because of course, they're probably in getting this position would be the actual end of the world, not just a sign that the end of the world was coming. They and I'm quoting directly here, mix some unworthy competitors with the deserving. So yeah, basically, it was like a ruse to to choose and people that clearly weren't going to appeal weren't going to get elected and sort of confuse the voters. So they didn't, they didn't just put forward rubbish candidates or like allow rubbish candidates to run. But they made sure that it was confusing enough that a puppy and would not to get electe…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Roman Naming Conventions Jan 04, 2024
    Show notes

    It's here! We delve into the wonderful world of Roman names. How do we understand who’s who? How did the Romans understand who was who? We’re here to consider the complexities of Roman naming conventions.Special Episode – Roman Naming ConventionsWe look into some of the key elements of the Roman naming conventions of the Republic and the Early Imperial period. This includes the praenomen (the first name), the nomen (a reference to the clan or gens that the person came from), the cognomen (this name could have a variety of meanings!), and the agnomen (nickname).This is by no means the extent of types of names that Romans deployed over the course of their history, but it's a good start on some of the tricky bits including why Roman loved repeating themselves.We look at some very interesting examples included:RomulusNuma PompiliusLivia's dadAugustusAnd a certain Spartacus may also get a mentionIs that Augustus with a bunch of fancy titles? Oh yeah. This comes from a statue base in Rome.[I]mp(eratori) Caesari / divi f(ilio) Augusto / pont(i)f(ici) maxim(o) / trib(unicia) potest(ate) XXXVII / co(n)s(uli) XIII p(atri) p(atriae) sacrumThis is sacred to Imperator Caesar Augustus, son of Divine, pontifex maximus, holding tribunician power for the 37th time, consul for the 13th time, father of fatherland.More details on this inscription here.Roman names and the social hierarchyNaming conventions differed depending on who you were, the family you were born into, and what happened to you during the course of your life. Elite families had specific naming conventions, while different rules applied to enslaved people and those who were manumitted.Got famous for all the wrong reasons? You probably had one or more unflattering nicknames.Got famous for all the right reasons (according to Romans)? You likely had a name to recognise your superlative achievements.Interested in our favourite Roman name so far? It's none other than Spurius Furius! There's been a few gentlemen with this name, but for a real blast from the past, check out Episode 91 – The Furious Romans.SourcesBrill's New Pauly entries on the Praenomen, Gens, Cognomen, Agnomen, and Personal Names: RomeSalway, B. 1994. ‘What’s in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from c. 700 B.C. to A.D. 700’ The Journal of Roman Studies 84: 124-145.The longest attested Roman name is recorded on an inscription (ILS 1104). ILS stands for Inscriptiones Latin Selectae also known as CIL 14.03609Wilson, S. 1998. The Means of Naming : a Social and Cultural History of Personal Naming in Western Europe(UCL, London)Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman.Automated TranscriptEdited for Latin terminology and to support our wonderful Australian accents!Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to the Partial Historians.Dr G 0:16We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:20Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 0:54Hello, and welcome to this very special episode of the Partial Historians. I am Dr. G.Dr Rad 1:03And I am Dr. Rad. But what does that mean Dr. G?Dr G 1:08What is in a name? Would a rose by any other name would smell as sweet?Dr Rad 1:14One of us had to go there.Dr G 1:17It didn't take long for this to fall down into a big heap did it? Roman names. That's what we're going to be talking about today.Dr Rad 1:23We are this is a special Patreon listener request. And you know what? It is about bloody time that we talk about names because God knows we trip over them all the time.Dr G 1:37Look, there's nothing like a Latin name to really wake up the tongue when you're trying to get all of your announced creation happening on a podcast about ancient Roman history.Dr Rad 1:46Yeah, I think my favorite one which always looks really daunting on the page is Tricipitinus or Tri-cip-itinus.Dr G 1:54Yeah, stay right away from that.Dr Rad 1:57So the Romans are known for having seemingly bizarre naming conventions where a lot of men are named the same thing, which makes things very confusing. And they also have seemingly very long and phonetically challenging names. So we thought it is a good idea to talk about this because it's actually there's actually so much more to it, I suppose there might first meet the eye and like an episode where we're just rattling off console names and that kind of thing. Indeed,Dr G 2:27and I think I'd like to start I'd like to take us right back to the beginning the very early days of Rome just to sort of set the scene a little bit back in the olden dear listeners, welcome to The Land Before Time.Dr Rad 2:45A tale as old as time. Okay, the scene is set.Dr G 2:52Rome was open fields ruled by kingsDr Rad 2:56Houses were built out of mud.Dr G 3:00It was a beautiful time, a time of peace and prosperity.Dr Rad 3:04I actually just realized that most of the time the houses were built out of mud.Dr G 3:08Yeah, it makes sense. So the Roman kings have names right? So we've got guys like Numa Pompilius, and we've got Tullus Hostilius. And these are like precursor names. This is kind of like the first type of naming convention and Rome has to move away from it pretty quickly. Because it gets bigger, its population expands and they need to differentiate in more complex ways.Dr Rad 3:33Yeah,Dr G 3:34This initial naming system. SorryDr Rad 3:36No no no, sorry. I was gonna say, yeah, cause like the most famous part obviously, of rumoured names that most people know about is the three names. That man supposedly have the tria-nomina, which belongs to elite men. But right back at the beginning, it was not tria.Dr G 3:52It was not no, no. Sometimes it was just one. Romulus is just Romulus-Dr Rad 3:59He's a bastard!Dr G 4:02We know nothing about him his name, definitely. Because how did you get in charge of anything?Dr Rad 4:09Outrageous.Dr G 4:11And then we've got these guys like Numa, who have two names. Numa Pompilius-Dr Rad 4:15Getting more complicatedDr G 4:16And this follows. Yeah, it does get more complicated. So this is where they use a patronymic naming approach, which is pretty common, and you see it in a lot of ancient cultures. It's a very Indo-European thing to do, where the second name lets you know, who Numa is the son of. So the patriarchy is kind of like a little bit baked in already. So Numa is his praenomen – and that's his first name. It's probably what people call him. But he was the son of a guy called Pompeius. Which is cute. So we've got this -ilius suffix, which indicates “son of”.Dr Rad 4:51Right, okay. And the weird thing about the Romans, I suppose, is that the praenomen, which is like his personal name, There's not really a lot of them. Yeah, at least when we look back over the evidence, you know, not compared to nowadays where we probably put a lot of emphasis on what is that first name so much so that there are people who do just have one name like Madonna, Cher. Beyonce. Just me. I know they got one of them. I know. But you know what I mean? We put so much emphasis-. Yeah.Dr G 5:22Where somebody more regal is always known by their two names. Taylor Swift.Dr Rad 5:27Ooooooo wait wait, wait, wait, wait wait wait. Are you saying that Taylor Swift is more regal than Cher Madonna and Beyonce?Dr G 5:36I'm not. I'm literally just like nobody ever refers to just by her first name. They always call her Taylor Swift. I don't know why.Dr Rad 5:43No no, that's true. It's the same as like Kim Kardashian. But I think that's because it's Alliterative.Dr G 5:48Mmm that does not explain Taylor Swift at all. No. Moving away from that. Yeah. So the names get more complicated as time goes on. And the praenomen. First of all, it expands out a lot. We get heaps of praenomens in the early period of Rome's, sort of naming convention period, the early republic, yeah. And then it sends to really narrow back in again, by the time we get to the late Republic, definitely. So this tells us something about how the significance of names changes over time, and also the potential for that name to be distinguishing changes over time as well.Dr Rad 6:24Well, definitely, because I think that if we look at around the first century AD, whilst we have uncovered quite a few of these praenomen there's really only between sort of 15 and 30 that are probably used with any sort of regularity. By the time you get to like the late Republic.Dr G 6:44Yeah, if you're not a Gaius, and you're not a Marcus, who even are you?Dr Rad 6:47I know. A Publius? Don't me laugh!Dr G 6:50No gross, the whole name is a joke. So this trinomina is the combination of the praenomen (the first name), the nomen (which is the gens name, the clan that the person comes from) And there's the cognomen, which could be any kind of additional name, really. So it could be a personal name, it could be a nickname, or it could be a branch of your gens. So the family – the specific family within your gens.Dr Rad 7:23yeah. And it kind of makes sense that they ended up adding on a cognomen because of course, as you get more and more people, it helps to set them apart more, it distinguishes them more, and it tells you obviously more about where they're from potentially or something about them or their family. That's kind of the whole purpose of these names. Right.Dr G 7:42Exactly. And so you might have somebody who is known as Publius Cornelius Scipio, for instance. Publius is his first name, you know, it's a bit of a diamond a dozen. He comes from the Cornelius gens. So that's his nomen. And Scipio is the family branch within the Cornelii And that might be his three names. Now, unfortunately, that branch of the family ends up being massive. So you've got Publius Cornelius Scipio, a number of times and Roman historians get confused. But that's kind of the gist of it. You've got those three names. Now that guy is probably somebody who's coming up in the middle Republic, one of the most famous of the Cornelius Scipione's is Africanus.Dr Rad 8:31I was gonna say, I was waiting for it.Dr G 8:34He's coming, he's coming.Dr Rad 8:36It's gonna take a lot to take me away from you.Dr G 8:41So Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus has got four names. Wowzers.Dr Rad 8:48Well, you guess the thing you can just keep adding, if you really need you canDr G 8:51Yeah, well, he doesn't necessarily add this one himself. So that last one Africanus known as an agnomen, which is an honorific name that is given to you by other people for something great that you do.Dr Rad 9:06That is pretty cool. I must admit of all the Roman naming conventions. I kind of wish that we still practice that.Dr G 9:14So like our key example from I think the early republic, who we did many episodes on, is Gnaeus or Gaius Marcius (nomen) Coriolanus (agnomen) Because he gets that name after the siege of Corioli, the Volscian and city.Dr Rad 9:33Yeah, absolutely. And it's probably interesting to note, I suppose that when these names are developing, they start off having certain meanings as well. Like the praenomens that we are dealing with, particularly in the early republic, they do have interesting names, which I actually had not thought about up until this. So so Marcus, one of our most common ones, probably originated because someone was a born in March so it used it you might have signified something about like when you were born. And and, for example, Manlius. It might have signified that you were born in the morning for manes.Dr G 10:10Okay, oh, that's cute. Like Septimius Yeah, born in the seventh month, or Tiberius, who is known, named after the river god. So Marcus could also be a declaration of the gods Mars.Dr Rad 10:23Yeah, exactly. And so originally, these praenomens also had probably meanings probably to parents, I would say. But as we move on in time, and then that would have been probably very early on as we move on in time, I don't think that they tend to pick those for those particular reasons. The only one I think that might still have some meaning later on is the habit of numbering.Dr G 10:47Oh, yeah, yeah. But they don't usually use those for praenomens, necessarily, although sometimes – Quintus is a good one.Dr Rad 10:55Yeah,Dr G 10:56number five,Dr Rad 10:57exactly.Dr G 10:57Decimus, number 10. And some of them also come from different sort of language extractions. So Spurius, we think comes from Etruscan language. So it comes into Latin as Spurius. But it comes from the Etruscan ‘Spura' to mean community.Dr Rad 11:17Very nice. Now, when it comes to the nomen, Dr. G, this is probably the most important in terms of indicating your gens, right? When it comes to political life in the republic that we're going to be focusing on today, just because it gets too complicated. As time goes on, to carry on. Names continue to evolve the, um, the Republic, but we're starting with the origins.Dr G 11:41So yeah, the origin story of the gens. So as Rome's history is starting to flourish. So we've been looking very much at the early republic, in our founding of the city series, the gens becomes their sort of primary mechanism for establishing your place in Rome's hierarchy. Yeah. So even if Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Livy, and our other sources are sort of imposing this struggle of the orders a little bit on to this period of time, it's probably still the case that your gens – the family from which you derive- is a super important element of who you are, what your politics is going to be, and how you participate in ritual practice as well.Dr Rad 12:34Definitely.Dr G 12:36So this is part of the broader Roman understanding of patriarchy as well. So the gens name comes from the original ancestor, if you like, of the family. So it doesn't take long for that sort of ancestral connection to be enough generations back that people don't know who that person is anymore. It's just a name. And also, that it's a little bit murky enough, that if you're really in straights, about what to do with your life, you might start to lie about where your family came from,Dr Rad 13:12Scandalous!Dr G 13:14It is illegal, the Romans don't like that. They try to crack down on that. So if you've just pop up out of nowhere with a new name, that's going to be very suspicious. But for people who are trying to figure out where they fit in the mix of things, if they've got a few obscure family connections, and they're not really quite sure, there is a reasonable and plausible moment where you might be like, oh, yeah, no, I'm a Cornelii, obviously, just makes so much sense.Dr Rad 13:43Yeah, and it's so interesting, because again, if you go back to the origins, again, some of these probably had obviously, particular meaning something to do with that particular family. And it could be something to do with where they are geographically located. Once upon a time as you say, it might be to do with an ancestor. It might even be to do with some sort of like agricultural thing, you know, if you think about like the origins of Roman society, so for example, we often talk about the fabulous Fabians. Fabius might come from ‘faba' as in bean, which you might have with a nice chianti.Dr G 14:22A delicious Fabian, that's what I like to hearDr Rad 14:26It sounds a lot less fabulous. When you go back to the origins of itIt does explain why they're so full of fiber.Oh, yes. And, and as we said, with the praenomens as well, or…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Episode 145 - Power to the Plebs Dec 14, 2023
    Show notes

    We've all been waiting for YEARS for this… more power to the plebs! Yes, you heard us correctly. For once, the patricians will not get exactly what they want.Episode 145 – Power to the PlebsIcilii, Icilii, Icilii It is 409 BCE and another exciting year in the conflict of the orders (allegedly). The plebeians were enraged when elections were held for consuls instead of military tribunes with consular power. The plebeians decided to channel the advice of the First Wives Club. Don't get mad, get everything! Denied the chance to elect their hero from the previous year, the plebeians rallied together and secured THREE plebeian quaestorship. The quaestorship had technically been open to plebeians since 420 BCE. However, it took a decade for the plebeians to finally take the plunge. They were assisted by several tribunes of the plebs from the Icilii family. The Icilii often appear when something important happens for plebeian rights. Don't you just love the grand narrative of Roman history?Hungry for more, the plebeians decided to push for elections of military tribunes with consular elections. They were determined to elect a plebeian candidate in 408 BCE.The patricians were already aghast at the prospect of plebeian quaestors, so they were hardly going to let that happen. Once again, we find ourselves in a stalemate, with neither the patricians or the plebeians willing to back down. Join us for another action-packed episode!Things to Look Out For:Tribune of the plebs in trench coats and sunglassesWay too many Icilii running around Rome Dr Rad’s phone alarm going off and her not hearing it because, you know, she’s deaf. Really sorry about that, guys!Patricians fantasising about world apocalypseMore military action at the mysterious CarventumNeed to catch up on 411 and 410 BCE? Check out Episode 144 – Where in the World is Carventum?Our Players 409 BCEConsulsCn. Cornelius A. F. M. m. Cossus (Pat) Mil. Tr. c.p. 414 L. Furius (L. f. Sp. n.?) Medullinus (Pat.) Cos. 413Tribune of the Plebs(L.?) Icilius ? Icilius? Icilius Quaestors P. AeliusK. Fabius Ambustus (Pat.)P. PapiusQ. SiliusOur SourcesDr G reads the Fasti Capitolini and Diodorus Siculus 13.80.1.Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.54-55.Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Lomas, Kathryn (2018). The rise of Rome. History of the Ancient World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674919938. ISBN 978-0-674-65965-0. S2CID 239349186.Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects courtesy of BBC, Pixabay and Fesliyan Studios.Automated Transcript.Courtesy of Otter AI. Dr Rad 00:12Welcome to the partial historians. We explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad. And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts. Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the Hello, and welcome to another episode of the partial historians. I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad,.Dr G 01:04and I am your other host, Dr. G. Hey,Dr Rad 01:08Hey, Dr. G. Welcome to a history of Rome that's being told in excruciatingly painful detail,Dr G 01:17Just as the Romans would have liked it, I think.Dr Rad 01:19Exactly. I mean, we're just fulfilling their wishes.Dr G 01:22Yeah. Their fame lives on as long as we talk about them.Dr Rad 01:26That is correct. So Dr G, last episode we were dealing with 410 BC. Today we're going to be dealing with 409, it all makes chronological sense.Dr G 01:40Yeah, it looks so far. So good. I do not quibble at all with that logic. And 410 was an interesting year because we got introduced to a new location that we hadn't heard of before. Called Carventum. Ah, yes, we still aren't entirely sure where it is, the mystery remains. But we do think it might be part of a important strategic location that sort of forms the edge of Roman territory and Hernitian territory. And obviously, the Volscians and the Aequians want to get their little dirty paws all over it.Dr Rad 02:19Like they do everything. Indeed,Dr G 02:22Indeed, that's just the way those guysDr Rad 02:24Oh, I know, don't they knew that Rome is destined to be the superpower in this corner of the world.Dr G 02:29Not yet. Not yet.02:33So what we had last time was some classic conflict of the order stuff, I think, hmm, yeah. So we had our command commander called Valerius, who ended up being quite an unpopular, man.02:51Wow, how so? Is it even possible for Roman to become unpopular?Dr Rad 02:56Well, he was so harsh, I think after the conflict that had happened between the patricians like himself and the representative of the people, the tribune of the plebs, Menenius, that he kind of alienated them just just that much. They didn't like him at all. And they really liked Menenius. Yes, well, that's the kind of the way it goes at the moment, isn't it? There's a lot of backwards and forwards with this kind of class political struggle, which is really evidence as far as we're concerned, I think the nature of our annalistic sources, Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, whenever if ever he put us back into the scene, really trying to figure out what it meant to be a Roman in this very early period of history, where they don't have a lot of good written accent evidence from the time in question. Exactly. So basically, we ended up with this situation where because Valerius had made himself so unpopular, and Menenius, the tribune of the plebs looked even better by comparison, that the patricians were incredibly nervous because they were sure that if they went with elections for military tributes with consular power, that Menenius would end up being the first plebeian to actually get elected to this office, which is technically open to anyone.Dr G 04:26Quelle horreur, we cannot possibly have a plebeian and charged around here. IDr Rad 04:33 It simply cannot be tolerated, it will not be tolerated, and therefore we're going to have concealer elections and concealer elections alone. Well,Dr G 04:41Well, this all makes sense for what comes up in 409 BCE.Dr Rad 04:46It does I think it might be time to dive inDr G 05:06It is 409 BC A exciting time in Romans history as is every year I have to say. And I have some excellent news for you, Dr. Rad. Oh my god. Am I about to fall off my chair? Have you rediscovered Dionysius of Halicarnassus Oh sadly no. But the Fasti Capitolini is back, baby.Dr Rad 05:30Well, I'm glad you have something.Dr G 05:33Literally two namesDr Rad 05:37it's better than a big fat nothing you bring into these episodes. Oh,Dr G 05:42yeah, like a historian is only as good as their material. YouDr Rad 05:46always do your research.Dr G 05:48I try but it's hard to cobble together things for me at the moment. Yeah, Yeah, to be honest, I think I have the easier deal, actually having something to read. Oh, Look, you bring the narrative and I give you a whole bunch of names. And I don't know what happens to any of them. And that I think is fine. That is how we're sharing the load right now. Well, thereDr Rad 06:06certainly are a whole bunch of names for the year for now. So why don't you tell us who they are.Dr G 06:12I show we have two consuls, which is very much in keeping with that fear in 410. About anybody coming into position as military tribune with consular power. You can solve that by just having consuls. So we have Gnaeus Cornelius Cossus. We have had him in our mix before he was a military tribune with consular power in 414 BCE. And we also have Lucius Furius. Medullinus. I know ,a Furius back in the mix. One of our favourite genses right now. Now he was previously consul in 413. And he is in the middle of an upwards career trajectory. He doesn't know it. But foreshadowing weDr Rad 07:01do thinkDr G 07:05we certainly do. Thanks a lot.Dr Rad 07:09It looks like yes, weDr G 07:11are. And we've also got in addition to the consuls, we've got three possible tribune of the plebs. And to make things even more interesting on this front, every single name that I have attached to the role of tribune of the plebs is an Icilius. At least three named possibly different. Icilii in the tribune of the plebs mix.Dr Rad 07:37Okay, hilarious. But it does make sense because if we're ramping up the conflict of the oddest narrative, this duel between the patricians and the plebeians, who better to have in office than an Icilii?Dr G 07:53it does present us with some problem so. So the tribune of the plebs position it's been talked about in previous years, we've definitely talked about it where it seems like our sources are written sources are assuming that there's already 10 of these characters. Yeah. We don't have any good evidence to establish that the body of the tribune of the plebs was that large this early inroads history.Dr Rad 08:21How are you? He's just had a very large dinner.Dr G 08:25What do you mean this 10 of him? Just one man, where are you very large coat. So we've got three possible Icilii as tribune of the plebs, no other group is named, but that would be a substantial faction within the tribune of the plebs, if they were a group of 10.Dr Rad 08:43It is. But as we've highlighted, this is a family that has a very strong association with the office of the tribune of the plebs, they often pop up just when things get dramatic,Dr G 08:53They do. And this gives you a sense that maybe something dramatic might be on the horizon this year as well. So I guess we'll see motion. If you times your Icilius by three, do you get three amounts of drama three times, I don't know, I guess we'll find out together. The other group that I have names for quaestors.Dr Rad 09:15you might say this.Dr G 09:18And in lieu of the fact that I have very little actual evidence to provide you. What I've done is I've gone through the names of the quaestors to try and sort of place them in the broader scheme of like, what might be going on in Rome, with Roman families.Dr Rad 09:34I always love when you do this, because as you know, anything to do with Latin, including names is not my strong point.Dr G 09:42And Look, I don't think it's really mine either. But I do enjoy sort of building a picture for myself, like where do all these characters fit? Yeah, because the names often end up sounding a little bit samey because the names all have the same kind of endings. And then, after a while, you're like I'm sure I've heard this name before. But is it a different guy? So for just for like the sake of like trying to keep everybody straight in my head, I enjoy sort of delving into the family side of things. Absolutely. So our first quaestor is Publius Aelius. Now I Aelius is known as a plebeian gensDr Rad 10:24I'm not going to give too much away, I'm just gonna react calmly.Dr G 10:28Calmly, calmly. And they do have a recorded history from around about this period. So the fourth century BCE, so jumping head just a few years into the next century, and all the way through into the late imperial period. So this is a family that has real longevity in terms of their history and legacy across generations. Now, we might be getting this name now, because of the associations the family takes on in the late Republic, okay. Now, I don't know, I like I'm just, I'm talking really slowly because I'm waiting for you to be like, I'll jump in and tell you what's going on.Dr Rad 11:13I'm not gonna jump in at any point. I'm just gonna let you talk through all of these names and shock you.Dr G 11:19Okay, okay. I'll prepare myself for the shock. Okay. So we have some figures, like Quintus Aelius Tubero, and this is heading into the this late Republican period who's the nephew of Scipio Aemilianus. And he's infamous or famous depending on which side of politics you're on as an anti Gracchan figure. So somebody who's like on the conservative side of politics, yeah, the Gracchi a very progressive and not everybody's into that. And then there's also a Quintus Aelius Tubero, same night name different guy. Yeah, who is a jurist and historian. And he wrote a 14 book Roman history from the foundation of Rome to the Punic WarsDr Rad 12:12Suspicous.Dr G 12:15Well, this is really interesting, because we think that this Aelius Tubero is a common source for Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Aelius Tubero himself. Those books are no longer extant. Yeah, so anybody if you find a manuscript hiding in a monastery, you get in touch, yeah, get in touch. We'd be very excited historians everywhere would be very excited to find ideas to grow, but we think he's utilised by both. So there's a sense in which living and Dionysius are being influenced by an Aelius in their own writing. And so they probably have particular ideas about what Aelius' are like in terms of their character and disposition. Okay, we move on our second quaestor is Kaeso Fabius Ambustus. Definitely a patrician, a fabulous Fabii. Yeah. And likely related to Quintus Fabius Ambustus, Vibulanus who was the consul of 412,Dr Rad 13:19I was gonna say this, this name feels like more familiar territory.Dr G 13:24Yeah, yeah. And I think the expectation is that you would assume that the quaestor was would be patrician at this point. So it is quite interesting that we do get a mix of names that seem to suggest that both patricians and plebeians were in the quaestorship this early on.Dr Rad 13:42I'm not gonna give in I'm gonna sayDr G 13:46just keep putting a little hoping that your bite. Okay, all right. Now third quaestor is Publius Papius. Now, this gens, the Papius gens is an italic gens. And you might think to yourself, yeah, but surely all genses are Italic genses us we're talking about the Romans here. But when we're talking about italic peoples, we're generally talking about people beyond the Romans. Because we tend we tend to classify the Romans as their own thing, even though they're clearly part of the broader italic community. But the Papius gens has connections to the Samnites and Oscan speakers. So this is thinking about the sort of the hilly region to the east of Rome, but also South heading towards compania in the same sort of mountainous region. This is really the Oscan speaker kind of territory, they'ee plebeian, considered to be plebeian. And then we also see the Papii family go on to hold positions of tribune of the plebs. So there's some spoilers for you, dear listeners, coming up in a podcast near you, but the Samnites I think we We've mentioned them maybe just an episode or so ago, well, theyDr Rad 15:04are going to become a regular feature this time. NowDr G 15:08that they've sort of entered in to being mentioned, they're going to continue to be mentioned, they are going to grow to be quite important to the way the Romans understand themselves. AndDr Rad 15:20they must be crushed up to G. Let me make that clear, they must be crushed,Dr G 15:25we may have a series of conflicts known as the Samnite wars coming your way soon, in the next century.Dr Rad 15:32It does make sense we have talked about the fact that they are possibly on the move a bit in this time period, tha…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Partial Recap – 410s BCE Dec 07, 2023
    Show notes

    What a confusing decade the 410s have been. It's definitely time for a Partial Recap! We run through what the ancient sources tell us about this decade.The Partial Recap – The 410s BCEWant to get all the details? Jump in at Episode 140: The Commonwealth of Slaves. Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. TranscriptDr Rad – Welcome to the Partial Recap for the 410s BCE!Dr G – I’m Dr G Dr Rad: and I’m Dr RadDr G: and this is our highlights edition of the 410s in Rome. We’ll take you through from 419 to 410 in an epitome of our normal episodes. Dr Rad: Perfect for those mornings when you don’t want some lengthy rhetoric with your coffee – but please be warned – the Roman world is a violent one. Dr G: Get ready for a recappuccino. 419 BCEIn 419 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Agrippa Menenius Lanatus, Publius Lucretius Hosti Tricipitunus, Spurius Nautius Rutilus and Gaius Servilius Axilla.This was a year of high drama, mama!Some of the slaves in Rome decided to stage a pretty audacious uprising – setting fires all over the city and then taking control of the Capitol whilst everyone else was distracted. Naturally, Rome’s best bud – Jupiter – made sure their plot failed.In other words, some of the slaves turned informer and were rewarded with their freedom and a healthy bonusAs for the rest of the slaves – they were simply showered with attention – of the sharp and pointy kind. It’s a sad tale that does not end well.The Aequians and the Labici started rumbling in the distance this year – there was no major military action, but the Romans had their eyes peeled. 418 BCEIn 418 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Lucius Sergius Fidenas, Marcus Papirius Mugillanus, and Caius Servilius Axilla. Ambassadors from Tusculum arrived in Rome in this year with very expected news – the Labicani were ready for war. They were so ready, they had already teamed up with the Aequians and started attacking areas in the countryside.The Romans did not need to hear any more – it was war! The Senate dispatched two of the military tribunes to campaign whilst one would remain in the city. The military tribunes immediately started slappy-fighting over who got to command the armies Quintus Servilius – the dictator who had captured the slippery city of Fidenae and father of one of the military tribunes – had to step in and send them all to their rooms whilst he sorted out the mess. Servilius placed his son in charge of Rome and packed off the other military tribunes with a hefty smack around the ears and some stern marching orders – “You’ve bragged an awful lot about yourselves so – You’d better WERK!”Almost as though the ROmans knew something was going to go wrong, only ten tribes were levied – and it was just as well because the military tribunes started swinging their ….swords around before they had even left the city.They could not agree on anything – the struggle was real.Things were so out of control that their lieutenants had to insist that the military tribunes held supreme command on alternate daysNow, none of Rome’s wars happened very far away, so word made its way back to the city. Quintus Servilius told his son to get ready – disaster was on the horizon.Sure enough, Sergius ended up falling for the Meryl Streep performance given by the Aequians in an engagement and many of his men were slaughtered. The following day, the Roman camp was almost entirely surrounded and they had to abandon ship. OH THE SHAME! The leaders managed to grab their standards on the way out and headed for their most adorable allies – the Tusculans. With the rest of the Roman forces scattered as they fled – confusing reports reached Rome The general impression was – WORLD APOCALYPSE. Thanks to the wise leadership of Daddy and Sonny Servilius, the rest of the tribes were levied and readied. Sonny Servilius’ scouts tracked down the surviving soldiers at Tusculum, and it was a real morale booster to see that they were, you know, alive.The Romans felt a little more positive, but they knew they weren’t out of danger yet! Just to be safe, Daddy Servilius was made dictator. Servilius Snr chose Jnr to serve as his master of the horse – or perhaps he chose Mr Servilius Armpit (AHALA)?The Servilii trotted off into the fray and wouldn’t you know it? The Aequians were so overly confident after winning that Oscar in the previous battle, they started to get sloppy.In the very first engagement, Servilius Snr caused major disruption amongst the Aequian forces.Just to prove that he was the most serious Servilii in the camp, Servilius Snr killed a standard-bearer who hesitated when he ordered his troops to advance quickly. There’s no time for thinking!!! Just act, now, move, move, move.The Romans were feeling his energy and went full berserker The Aequian defence collapsed and this time they were the ones running back to their camp in total disarray. The Romans seized their camp and snatched that bootay.Perhaps feeling like he could relax a tad, Servilius Snr allowed the soldiers to share the spoils.The Romans had won the battle – but what about the war?The Aequians had retreated to Labici, to hide with their allies – and the Romans soon showed up with a cake and some ladders. Labici was pillaged, allowing Servilius Snr to lead his forces back to ROme, where he laid down his powers after eight days of exhilarating action. What a thrill ride! The Senate were pleased, but they also knew that they needed to be on guard. Those tribunes of the plebs would want to get their greedy paws on that new land that had been conquered. A quick decree was passed and a colony of 1500 was set up in Labici. 417 BCE and 416 BCEIn 417 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Publius Lucretius Hosti Tricipitinus, Agrippa Menenius Lanatus, Caius Servilius Axilla or Structus, Spurius Rutilius Crassus OR Spurius Veturius Crassus Cicurinus. In 416 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Aulus Sempronius Atratinus, Marcus Papirius Mugillanus, Quintus Fabius Vibulanus, and Spurius Nautius Rutilus. The events of these years blend together a bit, so be prepared for a double act. As predicted, some tribunes of the plebs started making the most unreasonable of demands about land. Spurius Maecilius and Marcus Metilius wanted a law that would divide captured land up amongst Roman citizens. Does this make any sense at this point in time? Probably not! But it’s classic conflict of the orders stuff – the plebs not getting their fair share, concerns over land allotment, greedy patricians… just lean into the narrative and try to ignore those gaping holes in the story.The Military Tribunes with consular power started chatting with the senators and other elite dudes – clearly, this was time for an EVIL PLAN.Appius Claudius, descendant of the infamous decemvir, came forth to uphold his family legacy of douchebaggery He suggested that they should keep it simple stupid! Just divide and conquer – convince the other tribune of the plebs to use their veto against their colleagues in exchange for patrician favour. The snaky senators successfully won the wallflower tribune of the plebs over and sure enough, the law was vetoed. All Maecilius and Metilius could do was call them CLASS TRAITORS and throw a huge hissy fit in front of an assembly. 415 BCEIn 415 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Publius Cornelius Cossus, Caius Valerius Volusi Potitus Volusus, Numerius or Marcus Fabius Vibulanus, and Quintus Quinctius Cincinnatus. Conflict was brewing with Veii AND the Aequians – but then both of them postponed the warfare for another day. The people of Veii were scared away from a fight due to the flooding of the Tiber River, which ruined some of their farms. The Aequians were still smarting from a previous defeat when they had been defending the Bolani – an Aequian tribe.The Bolani seemed to have provoked battle by attacking the Labici and the new Roman colony, but hadn’t managed to secure a victory.Lucius Decius, a tribune of the plebs, tried to push through an agrarian law that would send colonists to Bolae as well as Labici, but his fellow tribunes would not agree to a plebiscite without the Senate giving their okay.Bolae would not be in Roman hands for long – so perhaps it was for the best!414 BCEIn 414 BCE, the military tribunes with consular power were Cnaeus Cornelius Cossus, Lucius Valerius Potitus, Quintus Fabius Vibulanus and Publius Postumius Albinus Regillensis. Postumius was placed in charge of a campaign against the Aequians, and he enjoyed a lot of success. His troops seized Bolae and beat the Aequians without too much effort. Unfortunately, Postumius continued the family tradition of stuffing up royally.There was some confusion over exactly where it all went wrong, but it definitely had something to do with the war booty from the captured city. Whether Postumius broke a promise about their share, or there was not enough in the city to please the army, the soldiers were Spurius Furius about the lack of goods.Before the situation was resolved, Postumius was summoned back to Rome to deal with an uppity tribune of the plebs – the seductively named Marcus Sextius.Sextius was pursuing Decius’ dream of colonists in Bolae. Give the land to those who bled for it!Postumius could not help but make a nasty comment upon hearing about Sextius’ agrarian law – he essentially made a threat about those who fought under his command.The Plebeian assembly and the Senate were seriously perturbed when they heard what had been said – their subligaculums were definitely in a twist!Marcus Sextius made sure to bait Postumius – how dare he threaten his brave men? How DARE he even suggest that they be punished like mere slaves? And BTW – how are patrician twats still getting elected to the highest office when THIS is how they treat the people? #plebeianmilitarytribuneforoffice However, the group that were most upset were the army back at Bolae. The quaestor, Publius Sextius (or Sestius), picked up on the mutinous energy and decided that the situation called for a violent solution.He used a lictor to arrest a brawling soldier – and surprise surprise – this only inflamed matters.In the subsequent riot, the quaestor was either seriously injured or killed by a stone to the noggin. Postumius had to return to Bolae to sort matters out.He came with the trademark harshness of his gens, and decided to execute some of the ringleaders in a particularly painful way. The cries of the condemned caught the attention of a crowd, and when Postumius and his forces tried to get the angry people under control, they turned on him – stoning him to death. With one of the leading magistrates murdered in broad daylight, his colleagues quickly set up a senatorial inquiry into his death – but had to hit the brakes when the plebeian tribunes used their veto power.Terrified that the plebeians were angry enough to elect one of their own as military tribune in 413 BCE, the senate tried to run consular elections. Once more, the plebeian tribunes blocked their plans, and an interregnum ensued.. 413 BCEThe interrex, Quintus Fabius Vibulanus, organised elections and so In 413 BCE, the consuls were Aulus Cornelius Cossus and Lucius Furius Medullinus. A senatorial resolution was passed to investigate the death of Postumius.Given how popular Postumius was, the investigators wisely only punished a few for their role in his murder – and most of them seem to have been allowed to commit suicide.The plebs were not appeased – a lack of punishment cannot make up for a lack of agrarian reform, people!Leaving the sulky atmosphere in Rome, the Volscians attacked Herncian territory and the consul Furius was dispatched to slap them back across the border.The Volscians were nowhere to be found when Furius arrived, so instead he captured Ferentinum – just to annoy them.There was a real lack of booty in the town – leading to a rather anticlimactic conquest that the Romans casually turned over to the Hernicians.412 BCEIn 412 BCE, the consuls were Quintus Fabius Ambustus Vibulanus and Gaius Furius Pacilus.The real star of the year was one of the tribunes of the plebs – Lucius Icilius. You might recall this family as they have a history of being plebeian heroes. Icilius tried to revive the old agrarian laws – but he did not get far as a pestilence hit ROme. The population of Rome was not decimated but they were certainly way too sick to be worrying about politics. 411 BCEIn 411 BCE, the consuls were Marcus Papirius Atratinus and Gaius Nautius Rutulus. After the outbreak in 412, Rome was in danger of a famine.Whilst some people were a little tight-fisted in this time of need (cough cough – Samnites) – others made sure that the Romans were well-supplied. 410 BCEIn 410 BCE, the consuls were Marcus Aemilius Mamercinus and Gaius Valerius Potitus Volusus. The Aequians were gearing up for another bout with the Romans, and the Volscians were happy to sign on as their auxiliaries. When they started attacking Latin & Herncian territory, the consul Valerius started conducting the levy.In swept the tribune of the plebs – Marcus Menenius. Seizing his moment, Menenius refused to let the levy proceed without an agrarian law FIRST.Whilst the Romans squabbled, the citadel of Carventum was captured by the Aequians.The patricians tried to use this loss to turn the people against Menenius Playing on their divide and conquer tactic from earlier, the patricians had already managed to talk the rest of the tribunes into siding against Menenius – and his refusal to allow the levy after this loss provided them with an airtight excuse for their bizarre stance.A Mexican stand-off ensued, with neither side willing to back down and a lot of hysterical posturing. The rest of the tribunes decided to take a very dramatic step – publicly supporting Valerius’ right to use force and fines to get people to enlist in the army. With this authority in hand, men who were refusing to enlist were dragged in front of the consul. This example was enough to scare almost everyone else into signing up.The Roman army was now able to march off to the citadel of Carventum,It wasn’t the happiest union between commander and troops, but the ROmans got the job done.The enemy was routed.Valerius was not about to give the army the meager spoils after the trouble they caused, so the quaestors were put in charge of auctioning off the goods. This endearing act meant that Valerius was showered with abuse during his ovation back in the city, whilst Menenius was showered with praise. With all of these anti-patrician vibes in the air, the elite were looking around nervously and organizing consular elections for the next year. Whilst our sources are clearly pushing the conflict between the orders, the Romans seem to be taking on a more aggressive policy of expansion in this decade – makes you wonder what lies ahead!Dr Rad: And that was the 410s in Ancient Rome… or was it? Dr G: Remember, this has just been the highlights from the ancient sources, so if you want to delve into the complexities of the different evidence from this period, check out our narrative episodes. Jump in at Episode 140: The Commonwealth of Slaves to join us for a deep dive into the 410s BCE. Dr Rad: Thanks for turning in to this Partial Recap!For our full show notes and edited transcripts, head on over to https://partialhistorians.com/Support the showPatreonKo-FiRead our booksRex: The Seven Kings of RomeYour Cheeky Guide to the Roman Empire Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Where in the World is Carventum? Nov 16, 2023
    Show notes

    Carventum enters the annalistic narrative of Rome and raises some questions. But in order to get there, we need to consider what Rome faces in 411 BCE. And it seems that the Roman elite are having a run on consuls recently, which, if we follow Livy, means that the plebeians continue to be locked out of the highest magistracy…Episode 144 – Where in the World is Carventum?411 BCE – A Year Better Forgotten?Sadly there’s not much to report about 411 BCE and what there is to know if the kind of thing the Romans would probably rather forget. Turns out that there’s a pestilence on the loose! To compound problems, sick people can’t farm and this has compromised the harvest. Rome faces challenges to its grain supply and they turn to their neighbours for aid. Keen to catch up on the action from the years leading up to this situation? Check out Episode 143 – Special Victims Unit.Where in the world is Carventum?410 BCE gets off to a bad start when the Volsicans and Aequians decide to try to squeeze Rome’s allies the Hernicians… how will Rome respond? First they’ll have to find the citadel of Carventum (location unknown). And that’s only after they resolve the challenge of pulling together a fighting force. Whenever there’s a tribune of the plebs, we can assume there’s going to be something going on between the elite families of Rome. The tribunes come into their own when there’s a military affair in the off-ing because they can push for rights and recognition for the plebeians in potential exchange for military service. Will the patricians negotiate land rights in order to field a force against the Volscians and the Aequians?Map of central Italy including Rome and Praeneste, one of the theorised locations of Carventum to the east of Rome.An ovatio with the a side of verbal abuse…The Roman populace may be under the pump of the patricians much of the time, so perhaps a protest action at the scene of an ovatio is a very legitimate form of criticism! While Valerius attempts to process through the city to celebrate a military win, things don’t feel so much like a celebration as the people hurl abuse. Who will the crowd turn their support towards in the aftermath?Things to Listen Out For:Disagreements about LivyWhat’s happening in the Mediterranean?Who is Cassiodorus?Samnites and SiciliansA tribunician veto? In this economy?What is the tribune of the plebs and how did this position really work in the early Republic?Mercenaries????What are the quaestors up to?Our Players 411 BCEConsulsMarcus Papirius L. f. – n. Mugillanus (or Atratinus?) (Pat.)Spurius (or Gaius) Nautius Sp. f. Sp. n. Rutilus (Pat.)Our Players 410 BCEConsulsManius Aemilius Mam. f. M. n. Mamercinus (Pat.)Gaius Valerius (L. f. Vol. n.) Potitus Volusus (Pat.)Tribune of the PlebsMarcus MeneniusOur SourcesDr Rad reads Livy 4.52.2-4.53Dr G reads Diodorus 13.68.1, 13.76.1; Cassiodorus ChronicaBroughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects courtesy of BBC Beta and Freesounds.Crop from “A new map of Latium, Etruria, and as much of ancient Italy, as lay between Gallia Cisalpina and Græcia Magna, shewing their principal divisions, cities, towns, rivers, mountains &c.” Sheldonian Theatre (Publisher); Wells, Edward, 1667-1727 (Cartographer). Source: New York Public Library Digital Collections.Automated TranscriptEdited for Latin terminology and to support our wonderful Australian accents!Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to The Partial Historians.Dr G 0:15We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:20Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Welcome to a brand new episode of The Partial Historians. I am one of your hosts, Dr. Red,Dr G 1:02and I am Dr. G.Dr Rad 1:06Welcome, Dr. G. I'm so excited to be back in this century with you.Dr G 1:10Woohoo. We're nearly at the end of the fifth century BCE. It's kind of incredible that we've made it so far.Dr Rad 1:18I know. I know. So welcome, everybody. Welcome to our world of ancient Rome. Here we are traipsing our way through the 410s BC as we look at Rome's journey from the founding of the city. So Dr. G, before we head into a new episode, let's do a bit of a recap, shall we? Where were we last time we met?Dr G 1:42Look, the big standout for me was the return of an Icilius into the role of the tribune of the plebs.Dr Rad 1:51That's right. We have been dealing with all this conflict of the orders stuff for decades now. And I mean decades in the sense of the Romans decades.Dr G 2:01Maybe nearly a century now.Dr Rad 2:03A decade for us. But for them almost a century, this classic struggle between the patricians, the plebeians, who these people are, God only knows. But it certainly presented to us, like a battle between the elite and the powerful, and those who only wish they were.Dr G 2:24Yes, the old class struggle writ large in the early republic of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 2:30Yeah, and Icilius is from a family that's very much historically been on the plebeian side of things.Dr G 2:37Yeah, they famously a family that has held the tribunician of the plebs on a number of occasions, each of them landmark events in the struggle of the orders in this classic tale. And yet, what we seem to discover in this third iteration of an Icilius coming into the role is that the potential for revolutionary changes kind of swept away by other matters, there seems to be a pestilence of some kind.Dr Rad 3:09There is a pestilence, it's not the worst pestilence that room has ever seen. Because you know, we've had some bad ones in the time that we've been talking. I remember that time there was meat falling from the sky. Worse. I think that was I think that was in like the 450s. Maybe, maybe I should have checked that before I brought it up. But yeah, so we've had some bad things happening in the past. This one's not the worst, but it's certainly serious enough that people are very much focused on just getting by day to day.Dr G 3:37And this kind of leaves Rome and the situation of where we're up to with this history on tender hooks, if you will run with the meat analogy a little bit further with me, because we're like, what, what's going to happen in the next year, and luckily, we're here together to find out.Dr Rad 3:55We are indeed so without further ado, let's delve into 411 BCE.Dr G 4:21is 411 BCE. It's a very thrilling time. We've this means we have new consuls.Dr Rad 4:29We do have consuls. Note that we still don't have any military tribunes with consular power. I think the patricians are still feeling a little bit concerned about who might get elected if they opened that door.Dr G 4:42Yes, much better to make sure it's a patrician only situation and what better way to do that. And by having consuls in power,Dr Rad 4:53Exactly. So who we got Dr. G.Dr G 4:56All right, we have Marcus Papirius. Mugillanus, possibly Atratinus We're not really quite sure.Dr Rad 5:06So I think some of those names sound familiar.Dr G 5:08Yeah, some of those names sound familiarDr Rad 5:14Have I ever heard Marcus mentioned on this podcast before?Dr G 5:18Never! And fair enough. I mean, it's a very rare name. So this Marcus Papirius Mugillanus was previously the military tribune with consular power in 418 and also 416. So he's in the middle of quite an illustrious career at this point.Dr Rad 5:38Yeah, this is his decade, the 410s.Dr G 5:42It's happening for him. And he is joined by somebody known as Spurius or Gaius – we're not quite sure of the praenomen of this fella – Nautius Rutilus.Dr Rad 5:54Oh behave.Dr G 6:00Spurius Naughtiness, what are you up to? He was previously military tribune with concular power in 419, and also served together with Papirius Mugillanus in 416. So these guys have even held the top job together before.Dr Rad 6:17And yet, we're still not certain of their names.Dr G 6:20And we still don't know whether they're friends.Dr Rad 6:24I love the confusion of the source material. Everybody has different names, and nobody can figure out where they go.Dr G 6:31Yeah, and the Roman propensity for naming everybody after everybody else in their own family does leave a legacy of some confusion for everybody else studying them 1000s of years later.Dr Rad 6:44Absolutely. So what are these consuls facing Dr G? We've got a pestilence on the loose, we've got a tribune who's just itching to get an agrarian law passed, it doesn't bode well for them. I'm not going to lie. And sure enough, the year does not start well. As we know, when people are too sick to get out of bed, they tend not to farm. Lazy.Dr G 7:07How dare they? And the trouble with that is that it has some knock on consequences. Because if you don't farm while you're unwell, nobody does that farming for you. And then nobody's got food to eat. So then not only are you sick and hungry, then you're also starving.Dr Rad 7:25Exactly. And this has happened to Rome before after pestilence. We've seen this pattern again and again. And it looks like this year was going to be no different. Rome was in dire need of some corn, and it would have been headed straight for a very serious famine, except they asked around, they kind of pass the hat around and said, “Please, sir, I would like some corn,” to some of their neighbours.Dr G 7:51“Could you possibly spare any grain?”Dr Rad 7:53Yeah, exactly. They were asking up and down the Tiber. They apparently were like, you know, looking around the Tuscan Sea area saying, “Excuse me, I don't suppose you have any surplus grain?”Dr G 8:07I suppose they do have some are friends in the local region? Of course everybody would trade with them.Dr Rad 8:14No, this is true. So specifically the Samnites, who at this point in time, well ensconced in Capua and Cumae, would not engage in trade with Rome even in this dangerous hour of need, Dr. G. For shame.Dr G 8:32Yes, look, the Samnite relationship with Rome is going to be a rocky one. Let's put it that way.Dr Rad 8:40Yeah, foreshadowing, foreshadowing. Yeah, absolutely. I thinkDr G 8:44We haven't seen a lot of the Samnites in the Romans yet, but just you wait.Dr Rad 8:48Yeah, exactly. But the person that does apparently come to their rescue is and I'm quoting Livy here: Sicilian tyrants.Dr G 8:59Hmm. Fascinating. Well, that's quite interesting, actually, because the Sicilian tyrants haven't been having a great run of it themselves, because they've just been under the military invasion of the Carthaginians. So it's not like they're in a great way right now.Dr Rad 9:17Well, this is the thing, right? So most people have pointed out that Livy must be a bit off here because there actually aren't any tyrants ruling Sicily in this year.Dr G 9:27Ah Livy. He's a lair!Dr Rad 9:30Well, how dare you? How very dare you. Look, it's possible like it's close in time. It's possible. Obviously, we've just got the order things slightly out of whack, and it is possible.Dr G 9:47You're being very generous to Livy here.Dr Rad 9:49Well, look, let me put it this way. We're fairly certain that the person that he's referring to even though he does not name him is Dionysius the First, who came to power in 409. So you see it is very close.Dr G 10:04Very indeed. All right.Dr Rad 10:05Yeah. And it is very possible as well that the Sicilians would have been wanting to win Rome over as an ally at this point in time, because as you said, last episode, Dr. G, there's some issues going on in Greece, a little thing known as the Peloponnesian War.Dr G 10:29There are some things going on in Greece. And one of the consequences of that is that the Greeks are trying to push their way into Sicily. That is one of the grounds in which some of the battles are taking place. There's a Carthaginian interest also in Sicily. Sicily, historically, as I'm sure listeners are aware, is its location, right smack in the middle of the Mediterranean makes it kind of like a very strategic location for all concerned, who's who live around that Mediterranean edge. So interest is high. Sicilia is facing various incursions from different directions. So maybe they are desperate, even if the tyrant is not quite in place yet.Dr Rad 11:17Yes, I think that's exactly it with the Battle of Syracuse, which has just been waged in 413 BCE, or in the whole campaign sort of running from 415 to 413 BCE, as Athens is trying to strike out at people who are allied to the Spartans and supplying them with grain. And as you say, with Carthage rumbling around, and Carthage and Rome at this point in time are technically allies, it probably was a wise move for them to help root out whilst you know, Rome is looking around for some friends. No. Yeah. Now, most of the corn, however, comes from the Etruscans.Dr G 12:00Curiouser and curiouser.Dr Rad 12:03I know. So it seems that the Etruscans, who, by this stage are mostly located to the north of Rome, they obviously don't want Rome to take their business elsewhere, i.e. Sicily.Dr G 12:18“How dare you? We've got the best prices on grain.”Dr Rad 12:22Yeah. And the Etruscans also have a hostile relationship with the Samnites. Because the Samnites have kind of displaced them in Campania.Dr G 12:30Typical typical, the local politics is starting to get messy around here.Dr Rad 12:36I know an all over corn.Dr G 12:40Well, you gotta eat, what can I say?Dr Rad 12:42Yeah. So that's kind of about all the detail that I have in that basically, there was almost a very serious famine, but Rome managed to find some allies and managed to pull itself out of that, and the danger was averted. It does seem like there was a bit of a shortage of manpower, following on the back of the pestilence, it seems like the consuls need to bring in extra people to help them with things like embassies, because they just don't have enough people who are available to help them out with the day to day administration. But that's kind of it. So 411 is a very quiet year. But don't you worry, we're about to enter 410 And we're about to get some serious developments happening.Dr G 13:29Well, before we enter into 410, just to give you a sense of just how thin on the ground, my source material is currently-Dr Rad 13:38You're joking. You don't have any source material?Dr G 13:42I know I've been chatting about Sicily for like 10 minutes now, but I know nothing! So, in 411, the Fasti Capitolini is missing. So that's our big list of consuls and magistrates.Dr Rad 13:57Yeah. Which explains why we have all the issues with the names. Yeah.Dr G 14:00Well, yeah, we'll explain some of it for sure. Yeah. And then I have Diodorus Siculus, who we've talked about recently, is useless, but he comes and goes in terms of accuracy. And when nobody else was around, he gets to be very accurate because he's the only one who's got the names.Dr Rad 14:20This is true.Dr G 14:21That that may or may not mean that he's correct. But nevertheless, so he has Mamercus Papirius and Spurius Nautius listed. Now there is the ongoing date discrepancy that happens wit…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Episode – A History of the Roman Empire in 21 Women with Dr Emma Southon Nov 02, 2023
    Show notes

    In this special episode we sit down with Dr Emma Southon to discuss her brand new book A History of the Roman Empire in 21 Women.This is the Roman antidote to all those fabulous reimagining of Greek myth by delving into the very real and very fascinating lives of some of the women who lived under the Romans.Special Episode – A History of the Roman Empire in 21 Women with Dr Emma SouthonWe discuss the choices Emma made about who to include and who to leave out as well as consider some of the women who stood out for us when reading the book.If you have a history-minded people to consider at certain upcoming celebrations that may or may not resemble the Saturnalia, this book is worthy of your consideration. Not only is Emma erudite, but she has a great understanding of just how quirky the Romans were.Things to tune in forThe challenges of ancient evidence (a perennial topic on our podcast!)The amazing life of Turia‘Manus’ marriage – an ancient form of Roman marriage which saw a wife come under the direct power of her husband (or his paterfamilias)The enterprises of Julia Felix*The conquests and political power plays of ZenobiaThe very particular approach to Christianity of Melania the ElderWe firmly recommend checking out Dr Southon’s work, which can be found on her website: https://www.emmasouthon.com/If you’re interested in her latest book, here are links to where to buy online:Australia – BooktopiaUK – Bookshop.orgUS – Please note the US title is A Rome of One’s Own: The Forgotten Women of the Roman Empire – Bookshop.orgEmma is the co-host of the History is Sexy podcast and can also be found on Instagram. Emma is a great friend of the show and you're most welcome to check out our other conversations on Agrippina the Younger and murder in ancient Rome.Just look at those glorious book covers! Despite the title difference, these are the SAME book. The US release is known as A Rome of One's Own while the UK version is entitled A History of the Roman Empire in 21 Women.Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman.Automated TranscriptLightly edited for clarity!Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to The Partial Historians. We explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Read.Dr G 0:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city. Welcome to a special episode of The Partial Historians, I am one of your hosts, Dr. Rad.Dr G 1:08And I am Dr. G.Dr Rad 1:10And this is a special episode because we are talking to someone extremely exciting. Dr. G. Dare I say? scintillating?Dr G 1:19I think you should say scintillating. Yeah, we are thrilled to welcome Dr. Emma Southon back to the show. Thank you so much for joining us.Dr Emma Southon 1:28Thank you so much for having me back. I just feel extra special when I get invited back like I didn't do something monstrous last time.Dr Rad 1:35Exactly, exactly. So, Dr Emma Southon, for those of you who haven't caused our previous episodes is one of our favorite guests for three reasons. Number one, she likes RuPaul's Drag Race and therefore will understand my random references to it unlike Dr. G. Number two, she likes women in history. And number three, she shares our outlook on the ancient Romans, which is that they are unintentionally hilarious and weird. Now to be a bit more specific, Dr. Southon is renowned a smarty pants and here's why. Aside from the obvious title before her name, she is the co host of the history comedy podcast ‘History is Sexy', along with our Kiwi cousin, Janina Mathewson. She's also the author of some of our favorite history books, including ‘Agrippina, Empress, Exile, Hustler Whore', autobuy autobiography, a biography of the most extraordinary woman in the Roman world, and ‘A Fatal Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum'. However, we have already had the pleasure of talking to her about these books. And today, we get to talk to her about another exciting volume that has just been released ‘A History of the Roman Empire in 21 Women: How Women Transformed the Empire'.Dr G 2:53Yay!Dr Emma Southon 2:56Impressive.Dr Rad 2:58Well, I will say this, you don't like a short title. I don't like a short title.Dr Emma Southon 3:03And you think I'd learn but that people struggle to remember short titles, but But yeah, I don't know. They end up being really long. In America, this book is called ‘A Rome of One's Own', which is snappier.Dr Rad 3:18Ahhh, nice.Dr G 3:18I do like that. I saw that on Amazon. And I was like, Oh, that is sweet. I enjoyed the pun.Dr Emma Southon 3:25It's yeah, I have friends who have much better puns than I am. And they come up with these great puns. And I'm like, right, well, that's my title. Thank you.Dr Rad 3:34Now you cover a staggering array of women in this book. And I have to say up front, we're not going to talk about the Regal period at all, because quite frankly, we can't talk about it any more. We've talked about it so much. The only thing I will say is, I think in a second edition, you're going to have to amend your chapter on Tanaquil, where you say that there are no popular histories that mentioned Tanaquil.Dr Emma Southon 4:03Yes, that's true, because you have now finally written one.Dr Rad 4:07Yeah, we both have we both had.Dr Emma Southon 4:09Yeah. But it is. I don't know. It was just so like, I went through as many as I could find, like all of them for like books of like a history of the Roman Empire. And like that I have kind of lying around in my house and reflect through the ones I could see. And they just skip right over her. They skip over the regnal period, like a lot like the whole, the kings are just kind of coughed over fairly often. But still, I was like, this is such a good story.I know. I know.Why would you not want to like go out of your way to include this. So yeah, so second edition paperback edition will have a specific reference to The Partial Historians.Dr Rad 4:48Yeah, thank you very much. So we feel okay now, we can calm down and talk about your book.Dr G 4:53Okay, the interview can happen now.Dr Emma Southon 4:55When I finally – because your book came out just before my end like a couple of months ago, where mine had already gone off like, and I wasn't allowed to change it anymore. And I was like, no, I could I could have done this with this so much. And I have thoroughly enjoyed it. So everybody should buy it.Dr G 5:13Oh, thank youDr Rad 5:13Ahh thank you. Well, we definitely felt that way about your book. And so we'd love to ask you some general questions to start off with about the style of your book. So your last book was about murder in ancient Rome. Why did you decide to, you know, change tack and go for a history of Rome, using the lives of women as your next project?Dr Emma Southon 5:35It's partly spite. So my other thing that I do during my days is I work in a book shop, and you will have noticed, it's impossible not to have noticed and moment that there is a been in the past two years ish, like a really big spike in interest in Greek goddesses, like retelling Greek myth, specifically, like retellings of female stories and Greek myth, which is great for, you know, ancient history in general, kind of, but also, you, as you will know, when you're a Roman historian, you think that Romans are the best. Yeah. And it's constant, like, oh, yeah, I mean, I guess the Greeks are fine. But Romans are better because they're funnier. It's so I kind of out of spite, when it'd be like, Yeah, but Roman women exist, too, and that they're better because they're real. And they don't like turn into spiders, or like, they're not goddesses, they're bad. So that makes them better. And so, a 50%, out of spite that I wanted people to also be reading about Romans. And to know that Romans are better than Greeks, and 50%, because I just feel like so much of like, popular Roman history is talking about men and like the, the standard narrative of Roman history of the store of the story of Roman history is so much just war and politics, basically, which is the sphere of men, which women are explicitly excluded from, and I thought it would be fun to kind of disrupt that a little bit and be like, one, there is a history of the Roman Empire that doesn't have any politics in it really, or has a limited amount of politics. And there is a, there is a history, which is more than just politics, it can also be what it is like to live in the Roman Empire at various times as various people. And it's more interesting to tell that story through women than it is through men and to show that women are always kind of around about and I realized quite early on into writing it that as kind of a historian of my age, I am really only the second generation of historians writing about women in the ancient world, like my supervisor, for my PhD, who is still working was like one of the first generation of people to do her PhD on women. And like, people like Amy Richlin and Suzanne Dixon, who are still around and wrote those first books about women in the Roman Empire are like, they're still teaching. They're still they're still at conferences like this. They're you know, they're older. But as we all know, historians never retire. So they're still around, they're still alive. Like they. This isn't like an old discipline women in Rome, or women in the ancient world at all. It's very, very new. And so, yeah, so it's time to bring it to their, the popular imagination out of the academy and start talking about it.Dr G 8:45I think you're doing a great service, particularly to readers who have become hooked on ancient Greek myths, because there is so much more to the ancient world than just, you know, having your tongue taken out or turning into a monster orDr Emma Southon 9:02And like it not to be like everybody loves the Greek myths, and they love them for a reason. But a lot of them are victimized women, and there are but there are stories which from a kind of feminist perspective, I have minor issues with like stories of perpetually victimized women and womanhood as being perpetually victimized. So it's nice to tell stories about ancient women that were not like being turned into spiders or having their tongue taken out or being held into the sea or like or have to be literal goddesses in order to be able to do anything.Dr Rad 9:36Yeah, and as as we can definitely testify, we realized once we started focusing on the early republic, that he'd have literally been years of episodes sometimes before we mentioned a woman, we suddenly realized when a woman would come up as you say in your book, like a Vestal Virgin or were like God, it's been like five years since about women at all.Dr Emma Southon 9:58Yeah, yeah. And it's so easy to fall into that and to be like, oh, all of the important stories are the ones that the Romans thought were important. But the Romans can't be trusted, because they have bad opinions about a lot of stuff.Dr G 10:12So true. So true. And I think this leads nicely into thinking about like, how did you come to the decision about which women to focus on because it seems like you've hinted already, in some sense, it's about availability of evidence. But there must be other criteria as well.Dr Emma Southon 10:28So in that early period, a lot of it is availability of evidence up until the later of because the archaeology is so limited, and you are kind of trapped with texts, particularly for like the Regal period, and then the early and middle Republic before their epigraphic habit kicked in. It was about who can I find, basically, and finding stuff for the very earliest period when they basically mythical was easier than I thought it would be like those early bits of Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. So so you've got Hersilia and you've got Tullia, like, there were more women than I thought. And so I just included all of them, because why not?Dr Rad 11:15Yeah, that's what we were surprised by as well. We started writing about the kings were like, actually, we get it like it's a it's a dynastic situation. It's not a dynastic situation, it's a family situation. So women have more of an opportunity to get sort of, you know, get a bit of soft power.Dr Emma Southon 11:34Yeah, exactly. As soon as you have a situation where one person is in charge, you have wives, and you have children. And when you've got children, you've got daughters in law, grandchildren, and then you have women who can do things like murder, their husbands marry their brother in law, who's also their cousin, murder their father running over,Dr Rad 11:54as you do as you do,Dr Emma Southon 11:56as you do, and can, they can do all of this really fun stuff. So that was fun. The Republican period is harder. And that was tough work, like finding women that you can include. Because they only appear at points of crisis. And very often, they only get a couple of lines to illustrate how terrible crisis is. But once you get into the Empire, like once things really start to kick off evidence wise, so late Republic, going into the Empire, and then coming like the later empire, there's so many women that it became a part of like, what story do I want to tell, and what women kind of will tell that story. So always wanted it to be not the women who are already included in books. So for women already had a biography about her, I kind of was like, No, and that kind of easily cut out all the emphasis. And I didn't want it to be a book about politics, and to tell the story that we already know. So I didn't want it to have you know, Livia and Agrippina. All of the kind of big women that we already know about, I wanted it to be women that you've probably not really heard of, or that tell a story that is more about what it is like to live in the empire than to rule the Empire. There are some exceptions, just because I like the stories like Julia Maesa and Julia Mamaea. I include because I just think that Julia Maesa is so cool.Dr Rad 13:24Look most people wouldn't have heard of them?Dr Emma Southon 13:26I don't think yeah, no, yeah, they're not women that you have heard of very often. And I wanted people from around the Empire. So I wanted to leave Rome at the point when the Empire becomes Imperial, and talk about women from around so that anytime that it was a choice between a woman that was in Rome, or a woman that was outside, I picked somebody who was somewhere else, basically just to because I wanted that empire to feel expansive. And I basically kind of had the time line almost and wanted it to be so we've got someone from every century, we've got someone pits people from various different parts of the empire, we've got different types of evidence. So we've got epigraphic evidence, you have archaeological evidence, we have text, different types of texts. And so if I have people that overlapped, I would cut them out. So I had at one point, there's a woman in Nero's like court, who is the keeper of his wardrobe. And then when Nero is overthrown, she goes to Egypt and blockades Alexandria, in an attempt to basically force Rome to put Nero back on the throne before he kills himself, which is a cool story, but also one, it's just the story of Rome. And two, it's a bit of political story, and it's would be so I chose instead for that period to tell the story of women living or on the f…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Victims Unit Oct 19, 2023
    Show notes

    In this episode we tackle the years 413 and 412 BCE. These years come hard on the back of the murder of the patrician Postumius. Rome is facing challenges that seem to be bound up in the spolia in times of war and the broader annalist focus on the idea of the Struggle of the Orders which has been the defining feature of the early republic in Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. To catch up on the unfortunate fate of Postumius, check out Episode 142 – A Wrongheaded Man.Episode 143 – Special Victims UnitOnwards and Upwards?Murder is not something to be overlooked lightly, especially when the victim is a Roman patrician. It might be time for an investigation! And not just any investigation, but a special taskforce is assembled to consider all the evidence and follow the clues wherever they lead.Livy mentions this group as a quaestio perpetua, but there’s good reason to be suspicious of this classification for the investigators. Strong evidence for the quaestio perpetua doesn’t emerge until the second century BCE over 250 years on from 413 BCE!Agrarian ReformWill Rome find a way to reform its practices around conquered land? This topic comes back to the fore as we have the name for a of the tribunes of plebs. Roman conquest of new lands also brings this thorny subject back into the public discourse. How historical could the issue be at this point in the early republic? And will the patricians finally offer the plebeians something on this matter? Time will tell!Issues with the VolsciansRome’s perennial tousle with their neighbours, the Volscii, continues in 413 BCE. The Hernicians seek Rome’s aid against the Volscian forces and Rome is happy to oblige. The city of Ferentinum comes to our attention through this situation. We learn about the location of Ferentinum as likely corresponding with modern Ferentino, which is to the southeast of Rome, and likely part of the territory of the Hernicians at this time. What happens next to the city of Ferentinum? Tune in to find out!Is that Ferentinum way down to the southeast of Rome in the territory of the Hernicii? It surely is! Source: https://www.heritage-history.com/The Return of the IciliiPerhaps Rome’s most famous plebeians gens at this point in early republican history is the Icilii. And in 412 BCE, we see another member of the Icilii gens come into the role of tribune of the plebs. Famously, the Icilii are connected with the Lex Icilia de Aventino Publicando which our annalist tradition places as early as 456 BCE. Looking to brush up on this? Check out our Episode 104 – Aventine, Aventine. Another Icilius is also connected with the second decemvirate on account of being engaged to Verginia. To revisit Verginia's tale, see Episode 114 – The Tale of Verginia.Things to Listen Out ForAncient sources? What sources?Leniency for those found guiltyLand redistribution in Bolae?Does Rome even have ager publicus to redistribute???Volero returns!?The introduction of later sources Florus and ZonarasThe Latin LeagueIs Rome entering an expansionist phase?A history of the Icilius gensPestilence!The Hernician FederationOur Players 413 BCEConsulsAulus (or Marcus) Cornelius – f. – n. Cossus (Pat.)Lucius Furius (L. f. Sp. n.?) Medullinus (Pat.)InterrexQuintus Fabius Vibulanus (Pat.)Our Players 412 BCEConsulsQuintus Fabius – f. – n. Ambustus Vibulanus (Pat.)Gaius Furius – f. – n. Pacilus (Pat.)Tribune of the PlebsLucius IciliusOur SourcesDr Rad reads Livy 4.51.1-4.52.1Dr G reads Diodorus 13.43.1, 14.54.1; Florus 1.17.1-2; Zonarus 7.20Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects courtesy of Freesounds.The Roman remains at Ferentino (ancient Ferentinum) include a first-second century CE archway which now has a road running around and through it. Image credit to Pietro Scerrato.Automated TranscriptEdited for Latin terminology and to support our wonderful Australian accents!Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to The Partial Historians.Dr G 0:15We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:20Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Romans saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 0:55Hello, and welcome to a brand new episode of The Partial Historians. I am Dr. G.Dr Rad 1:04And I am Dr. RadDr G 1:07Whoohoo, together at last across the waves of the internet.Dr Rad 1:13Excellent. Well, Dr G., here we are chatting about the history of Rome from the founding of the city. It's been a bit of a weird moment, I think lately, because we've just been speeding through, you know, in a way that we never had really before. It's crazy. The years are whizzing byDr G 1:30Our sources are crumbling around us its the sort of thing that makes ancient historians concerned. And also avoid writing scholarship on because they're like, I don't know what to say. Everything's, it's just cracks, cracks and no evidence. Ah!Dr Rad 1:49Definitely. I mean, one of our big themes of light has definitely been this conflict of the orders between the patricians and the plebeians, that seems to be the narrative that they are flogging to death.Dr G 2:00It is a narrative that we're not sure is real, but continues nonetheless in the sources that survive.Dr Rad 2:08You gotta love that when you when you're not sure that it's real, and yet it continues on.Dr G 2:14It's amazing. It's amazing. So we've had some trials and tribulations with a certain Postumius over the last couple of years,Dr Rad 2:24Yes, we have indeed, and this kind of fits into this whole conflict of the orders thing. So the last year we were talking about was 414 BCE, and in this year, a very shocking event happened, actually, because the Romans are big on military stuff. Most people I think, know that. There you go. headlines around the world academic says, “Rome was big on military stuff”. No one's ever said that before. So they're big on their military stuff, which means that they are big on order, discipline. And yet, we had the murder of a patrician elite one Postumius by his own men, seemingly insulted by a comment that he made during a conflict of the orders moment where there was debate about what was happening, you know, with the policies back in Rome. .Dr G 3:20Yeah, now, this is interesting, because I do have a source that's going to come up in this episode. So we're going to be looking at 413 BCE. And it suggests that this moment with Postumius is one that like many things in this early period of ruins history is difficult to nail down to a very specific time period.Dr Rad 3:43Okay, okay. I'm intrigued, I'm intrigued.Dr G 3:46Does he come back from the dead only to be killed again?Dr Rad 3:50He had some more sick burns and he hasn't done leveling them at the plebeians yetDr G 3:57Look, he wakes up from his grave has another shout and gets murdered for a second time.Dr Rad 4:03How dare you all question me you lowly vagabonds.Dr G 4:09Goodness me.Dr Rad 4:10But we did leave on this very dramatic moment, because I mean, honestly, I think in any society, the murder of someone who's supposed to be in charge is a big thing. And I think in any society, they say it's particularly the murder of someone who's like a general or something like that. Yeah. Someone who's really invested with authority in that society. It is a really big deal. So I don't think that the Senate are just going to turn around and go, Well, he was a bit of a douchebag. I, I think they're going to want answers!Dr G 4:42I didn't like him either!Dr Rad 4:43I think they're going to want the truth!Dr G 4:46This is hugely problematic, as you say, because he was invested with legitimate power as a general of the Roman army. He is one of these figures that we assume is legally capable wielding what we call imperium, this capacity to lead troops for those troops to then turn around and murder him, suggests a severe breakdown of Roman discipline on the one hand, but also calling into question the whole apparatus of how does legitimate power function. And part of the way it's upheld is through the process of enacting it repeatedly. So power gets reified over and over again, through every Roman general being able to successfully lead an army, whether they win or lose, coming back with that may where possible, and still in charge of them. And for him to not get to that point and for the troops to make the decision that revolting against the general is a is the best course of action, in any scenario suggests that there is some real internal problems in Rome, if this story is to be believed.Dr Rad 5:58Definitely. And I mean, even though what he said was despicable. I mean, he's patrician elite now come on. At the same time, it was just a comment. It was just a comment said in passing, for them to, you know, take it so personally, that they're going to go to murder. I mean,Dr G 6:18sources might disagree, though, as well. So like, the one sort of source that I had was talking about how he just refused to allow them to have an appropriate cut of the spoils.Dr Rad 6:28That's true. That's true, like there was the backstory, but it seems to have been this comment that kind of tipped them over the edge, which to me, suggests that there is something more serious going on here. If that's the trigger. There's something really serious going on.Dr G 6:43Yeah. What is it that we don't know?Dr Rad 6:45Yeah. And in my account, as well, last episode, we really did leave on a cliffhanger not just in the sense of the murder happening, but also a real fear amongst a senatorial slash patrician class, because in Livy, they're interchangeable that there was going to be a plebeian elected for the first time to supreme command: military tribune with consular power if they didn't do something to try and prevent that from happening. So they definitely concerned that once this is that they're taking it seriously because they're like, if we don't step in right now, we're going to actually have plebeians get ultimate power, which even though technically we agree that that was possible. We also secretly agree that it was never gonna happen.Dr G 7:31I'm having to agree on paper. Never want to see it in real life.Dr Rad 7:34Yeah, absolutely. So.Dr G 7:36Typical patricians.Dr Rad 7:37I know. So shall we segue to 413 BCE and see what the Romans are going to make of this mess?Dr G 7:43Let's do it.It's 413 BCE in ancient Rome.Dr Rad 8:20And I know we're not having military tribunes with consular power this time because it'd be too much of a risk – a plebeian might get in so Dr G., tell me who are the consuls for this year?Dr G 8:30We have first off, we have Aulus or Marcus – we're not sure about his praenomen – Cornelius Cossus.Dr Rad 8:39A name we know well.Dr G 8:42Yeah, but from a branch of the family that has been in power before certainly, but we're not sure that this guy has necessarily had the top job before.Dr Rad 8:52No, no. I mean, he's not the famous Cossus that was very involved in the conflicts that we were talking about in the 430s and the 420s.Dr G 9:00But presumably related to him.Dr Rad 9:02Presumably.Dr G 9:04And we also have Lucius Furius Medullinus.Dr Rad 9:11Furii!Dr G 9:14Now this is a guy that you want to remember. Okay. He is going to go on to have a very illustrious career.Dr Rad 9:23You didn't even need to tell me that Dr. G. Oh, you need to say it's a word Furii and I know it's going to be on fire.Dr G 9:29That family they can do no wrong. I also have listed an interrex for this year.Dr Rad 9:36Yes.Dr G 9:37A certain Quintus Fabius Vibulanus who you may recall or not, because all Roman names start to sound the same, was previously consul in 423 and was also a military tribune with consular power in 416 and no less than the very previous year 414.Dr Rad 9:58Well, that all makes sense, doesn't it? So they want some continuity there.Dr G 10:02Old mate knows how an election goes.Dr Rad 10:04Yeah, well, basically, in my account he comes in because they have an interregnum because there's this standoff about are they going to have military tribunes or are they going to have consuls. Obviously the plebeians are pushing to have military tribunes, the Senate like, “Absolutely no way, no how is that going to happen. Because we know that you're going to elect a plebeian and and that's disgusting. How dare you even thinking it!” And so they hold out. There's like this extended interregnum period apparently, until eventually they get their consular elections and consuls, which means that only patricians can hold supreme office in this year. So that guy that guy becomes interrex because as we know, interrex means that it is period where you don't have the official magistrates being elected, you've got a sharing of power happening. It's a weird hangover from the regal period that we continue to call interrex even though there is no king the king is dead. And this guy was the one that organized the consular elections whilst he was holding the temporary power of interrex.Dr G 11:11Yeah, and I'm sure he does an excellent job. I don't have any real lengthy animalistic sauce to rely on this year. I have a little bits and pieces. So for instance, I've got Diodorus Siculus, who lets us know that we've got Marcus Cornelius and Lucius Furius as our consuls, and also gives us the heads up that this is a tricky time for the Athenian war in Sicily. So just you know, to put broader Italy in its Mediterranean context, Diodorus Siculus gives us that little tidbit. He goes into heaps of detail about that war, but I stopped reading him.Dr Rad 11:56We don't need to know about the Peloponnesian stuff.Dr G 11:59This is not a history of Greece from the founding of the Greek-ness.Dr Rad 12:03Absolutely not.Dr G 12:05That'll be another podcast.Dr Rad 12:06Perish the thought.Dr G 12:08Await our spin off series.Dr Rad 12:11When we're done talking about the history of Rome, because we're going to be done so soon, obviously.Dr G 12:15That's right. We're preparing ahead for our next series. I've also ended up reading a little bit of a writer called Florus.Dr Rad 12:24Oh, a much later source than Diodorus, I believe.Dr G 12:31Indeed. Let me introduce you, to Publius Annius Florus. He is a man of African extraction, goes to Rome in the late first century CE and is flourishing and writing a lot in the early second century CE, so think Trajan think Hadrian, that kind of time period.Dr Rad 12:58Okay, so, so high empire stuff. Yeah.Dr G 13:01Yeah. And he seems to have been pretty good friends with Hadrian at certain points in his life. And one of the things that he is famously known for is his epitome of Livy.Dr Rad 13:13Which is handy because unfortunately, and I know it seems impossible, dear listeners, but it will happen one day, we do not have all of Livy either. Eventually, Livy also will peter out.Dr G 13:25I'm excited for when the tables turn, and maybe I have some sources. And maybe you're like, I don't have anything. I'm like, Ah, ha!Dr Rad 13:34It'll take a long time.Dr G 13:37You've got years left in Livy. So Florus is fa…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    A Wrongheaded Man Sep 28, 2023
    Show notes

    In this episode, we tackle the years 415 and 414 BCE and the downfall of Postumius, a very wronghead man. Episode 142 – A Wrongheaded Man Did you remember to RSVP for the war? In 415 BCE, the Romans were gearing up for war with Veii and the Aequians… but neither of their dance partners turned up! It takes two to tango and in this case, neither the people of Veii or the Aequians felt ready to get down and boogie.A Wrongheaded Man Indeed!War against the city of Bolae kicked off in 414 BCE. One of the military tribunes with consular power, Postumius, was placed in command against this Aequian tribe. Whilst the Romans enjoyed success in battle, their internal problems overshadowed the victory. How do you create chaos in Rome? Simply take a tribune of the plebs, add a dash of agrarian reform, then stir in an arrogant patrician. Livy described Postumius as a wrongheaded man, and a questionable comment certainly had serious repercussions. Will sticks and stones, or words, do the most damage?Quote courtesy of Teacher's Corner.Join us for another tale of disaster with one of the Postumii at the centre.Need to catch up on the previous conflict with the Labici? You can find our previous episode here. Things to Look Out For:Dr G accidentally skipping over 415 BCEVarious attempts at agrarian reformWhat is #trending amongst the eliteA snide aside with very dramatic consequencesSeveral important lessons from the Romans that could also be applied to parentingOur Players 415 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular Power P. Cornelius A. f. P. n. Cossus (Pat)C. Valerius L. f. Volusi n. Potitus Volusus (Pat) Cos. 410, Mil. Tr. c.p. 407, 404N. (or M.?) Fabius Q. f. M. n. Vibulanus (Pat) Cos. 421, Mil. Tr. c.p. 407 *Q. Quinctius L. f. L. n. Cincinnatus (Pat) Mil. Tr. c.p. 405Tribune of the PlebsL. DeciusOur Players 414 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerCn. Cornelius A. f. M. n. Cossus (Pat) Cos. 409L. Valerius L. f. P. n. Potitus (Pat) Cos. 393, 392, Mil. Tr. c.p. 406, 403, 401, 398Q. Fabius Q. f. M. n. Vibulanus (Pat) Cos. 423, Mil. Tr. c.p. 416P. Postumius A. f. A. n. Albinus Regillensis (Pat) Tribune of the PlebsM. SextiusQuaestorsP. Sextius (or Sestius)Our SourcesDr G reads Virgil, Aeneid, 6.771-776; Diodorus Siculus 13.34.1, 13.381, 13.42.6; Dio Cassius, Roman History, 6.23; and the Fasti Capitolini.Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.49-50.Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association)Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis)Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Lomas, Kathryn (2018). The rise of Rome. History of the Ancient World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674919938. ISBN 978-0-674-65965-0. S2CID 239349186.Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects courtesy of BBC and Orange Free Sounds.Automated Transcript.Courtesy of Otter AI. Dr G 00:12Welcome to the partial historians.Dr Rad 00:15We explore all the details of ancient Rome. Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 00:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 00:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 01:00Hello, and welcome to a brand new episode of the partial historians. I am one of your hosts. I am Dr. G.Dr Rad 01:10And I am your other hosts, Dr. Rad.Dr G 01:13Hello, Dr. Rad.Dr Rad 01:16It's so nice to have you back from Italy. Well, for me,Dr G 01:20it is a pleasure to be back. I'll admit I regretted it for a little while. But today is very sunny and warm and feels kind of Romanesque. So I'm back on board with being in Australia.Dr Rad 01:33It is getting very hot in here.Dr G 01:36Maybe too hot too soon. Yeah, it's a worrying sign. But nonetheless, this is going to cool down a bit later this week. So I can return to my wintry state. Your natural habitat as it were.Dr Rad 01:49Exactly, yes.Dr G 01:51So we are tracing the history of Rome from the founding of the city. And if you are interested in supporting our work, we have a Patreon. We also do some merch. And we've also just released our book on The Roman kings. So there's plenty of ways when you miss us between episodes, to feel like you have us close at heart,Dr Rad 02:14and D and you can pick up our book online in a digital version from Gumroad or from Amazon. Or you can pick it up in a physical form from Abbey's bookstore in Sydney.Dr G 02:29Yeah, we are very lucky to have it stocked in our hometown. So we're thrilled about that. And so in the grand tradition of where we're up to in this narrative history, I think we should start with a bit of a recap of what might have been happening up till now.Dr Rad 02:48Yes, well, last episode, we were talking about the years 417 and 416. And they were a bit blurred together, as far as I could see. Couldn't really separate them out. But what I could tell was that there was some classic conflict of the orders happening. Oh, boy,Dr G 03:06it's the subject that just keeps on giving.Dr Rad 03:08It certainly does. And so last episode, we were dealing with the fact that some of the tribune of the plebs were trying to pass a law about land, which is an ongoing concern, obviously, for the plebeian class. And in order to foil them, the patricians came up with an evil plan.Dr G 03:32Classic times, I mean, the minute you ask for agrarian reform, I think you're also at the same time asking for patrician evil plans. That's kind of these two things go naturally together for the elite in Rome.Dr Rad 03:44They certainly do. And so we had one of the Appii Claudii people, the Appius Claudius' is of the world coming along with a douchebag plan of turning Tribunes against each other, which of course, worked,Dr G 04:00Dammit.Dr Rad 04:02So that's kind of what we were dealing with last episode Dr G.Dr G 04:06All right. Now, I suspect that you will have lots of things to tell me about the things that are coming up.Dr Rad 04:14That's a relative term.Dr G 04:16All right. Okay. Well, that's good to know, because I am still sort of swimming about sort of, without a real proper narrative source to hold on to so always cobbling together little bits and pieces from all sorts of source material and hoping that I have a hint of something that might have happened.Dr Rad 04:35I know I'm picturing you very much as being like, adrift in an ocean just like paddling about like doggy paddle style, grabbing at pieces of woods that are just like floating there, just like at the end of Titanic.Dr G 04:48I always hoped as a as a dog in the ocean that I'll find a big stick. But no, sometimes I have more. Sometimes I have less.Dr Rad 04:58I'll take you any which way, Dr G.Dr G 05:02Excellent. All right. Well, let's jump inDr Rad 05:05Let's do it 415 BCEDr G 05:25Don't you mean 414 BCE?Dr Rad 05:29No I mean 415Dr G 05:33Let me scroll up. No wonder I don't know what's going on.Dr Rad 05:38I'm quite definite on that.Dr G 05:41Fair enough. It's 415 BCE certainlyDr Rad 05:47It is Dr. G. And I'm gallantly allowing you to once again tell me about the magistrates.Dr G 05:53Thank you. I have so little to say otherwise. So I really appreciate this generosity. Absolutely. This is a year where we have military tribunes with consular power. And there's a whole bunch of them.Dr Rad 06:07Yeah, there are, no there is, I mean, there was.Dr G 06:09They're all patricians. So let's get the big stuff out of the way. First. We have Publius Cornelius Cossus. We have one Gaius Valerius Volusi Potitus Volusus. I feel like that's a bit repetitive, but sure. He's got a lot of names. This will be the start of an illustrious career. So keep your eye on this guy. We have somebody who we're not really sure about the praenomen. It's either Numerius or Marcus as the praenomen Fabius Vibulanus, okay. And just to sort of cement the confusion around this guy, Broughton thinks that this might have also been the guy that was consul in 421. Now that guy had a praenomen, possibly of Gnaeus. So that leaves us with like three possible praenomens and so we really have no idea which dude this is. It's one of the Fabii Vibulani.Dr Rad 07:13He's a fabulous Fabian and that's all we need to knowDr G 07:15he's fabulous. And we continue onwards and hope for the best. Exactly. And we also have Quintus Quinctius Cincinnatus. Now this sounds like a very familiar dude. But actually, we haven't seen this guy before.Dr Rad 07:29No, but he must be from that family.Dr G 07:32Ooh, very illustrious, very esteemed. Well, allDr Rad 07:35of these names are actually pretty illustrious, aren't they? We've got the Cornelii, the Valerii the Fabii…Dr G 07:42Yeah, these are all families or patrician families that have been swimming around in positions of power before. So we we've definitely seen all of these families. Nobody here is like a fresh novus homo as it were into power.Dr Rad 07:56What did you call me???!Dr G 08:00Nothing, nothing. You've been here the whole time. I also have the name of a tribune of the plebs. Oh, yes. One Lucius Decius. Is he a 10 out of 10? You and I are making the same jokes now.Dr Rad 08:18Too in sync, Too in sync.Dr G 08:21That's it. This podcast is over. Right?Dr Rad 08:24Is that making the same jokes, it's time to move on.Dr G 08:27So I'll have some things to say about Lucia gaseous. I think at some point, maybe the narrative should unfold a little bit before I go into that kind of bit of detail.Dr Rad 08:38Okay, fair enough.Dr G 08:39I handed over duly to youDr Rad 08:41Why thank you. Let me tell you what Livy's says about this year, I mean, this is going to excite you so be prepared. Rome would have been facing two wars in this year. Now you notice I said would have beenDr G 08:57Livy, What are you doing?Dr Rad 09:00and that's because they both postponed Oh, I knewDr G 09:06I couldn't possibly make that time somebody somebody send for the army in three months. That's when I'll be next available.Dr Rad 09:13Exactly. I've made I've accidentally double booked myself. I can't possibly go to war with Rome right now.Dr G 09:18I have a tea party. Don't you understand?Dr Rad 09:20I've got to have my hair done. Takes a while.Dr G 09:23What do you mean they've been postponed Livy?Dr Rad 09:26Well get ready for the enthralling account of how these wars were postponed. I late I'm late for a very important date.Dr G 09:34I'm on the edge of my seat. Yes. Okay.Dr Rad 09:37So what are the first conflicts was with Veii. Who I actually feel like we haven't mentioned they in a little while. They've been a bit quiet, haven't they? Yeah, I mean, there was a bit of conflict going on there for a while, but here they are back back back again. Anyway, so the first conflict was meant to be with today. Now, allegedly, the leaders of Veii got spooked about going to war, because the Tiber had flooded, ruining some of their farms and farmhouses. And if you're about to get out geographical on me, just wait, because I will come back to that. Wait a minute. All right, if you're thinking that there is a problem now, I'm not geographically minded, so I probably would not have noticed this, but this is where geographers come in and save the day. But I'll come back to that in a second. The other one was with the Aequians. Now, yeah, okay. They were put off after having been defeated when they had allied with a group called the Bolani. Now, the Bolani sound like a delicious sandwich meat.Dr G 10:52What are you having? I'm having the Bolani, what about you? Exactly,Dr Rad 10:56exactly. Yeah. Now, it seems that the Bolani were a tribe that lived within this wider Aequians group. So that's why the other Aequians were helping them out. And Bolani had been one of the groups that had been attacking the territory of the Labici. And the new settlers at Labici. Hmm,Dr G 11:20yeah, I might have something to add to that. Okay. Well,Dr Rad 11:23I'll finish my little story about them, and then you can add your thing. Bolani had been hoping that they were able to get away with attacking Labici By getting all the Aequians together to support them in this quest. But they didn't get the backup that they were hoping for ended up losing their town and all their lands after a siege and a battle. And I quote my translator of Livy in a war, which does not even merit description. Wow. Okay. So I'm presuming that this means that this is a war that we haven't heard about, butDr G 11:59I'm willing to talk about this war, but I'm not willing to describe it. It happened. We're moving on.Dr Rad 12:04Exactly. Put it behind us. All right.Dr G 12:06Look, I appreciate that. And I wish that happened more with military history. I mean, the details are always baffling. Somebody ran down a hill. Somebody else was hiding behind a tree. Yes. Outrageous.Dr Rad 12:17The cavalry was you know, secreted behind some bushes.Dr G 12:21That's right. No, no, somebody jumped out of a cave, haha!Dr Rad 12:25took me by surprise.Dr G 12:27Goodness me. All right. So I think Bolani, the the Bolani people that you're talking about are probably the inhabitants of Bola or Bolae.Dr Rad 12:37Yes, yes they are. Yeah. Yes, I can confirm that.Dr G 12:40Okay, so this is the ancient city in Latium. That is, we think we know the position of it. So I'm getting sort of geographical again southeast of Rome, right. But even further east than the Castelli Romani region, so those mountains, there's not that many of them, they kind of stick out of the ground in an odd spot because they're volcanic in nature. Okay. But once you get around those, and like, you know, the magma stops spinning out and stuff, then you go back into like, you know, plains and valleys, and boiler is supposed to be over in that direction. So it's near the ancient city of Labicum. Okay, so the Labici and the Bolani would know each other probably quite well their neighbours,Dr Rad 13:26it makes sense why the people from Bolani you are trying to steal from the Labici then either way, I'm just gonna say for any other people who are watching drag race out there. I can't say this now without thinking of the Australian drag queen, Gabriella Labucci. This must be where she's from.Dr G 13:44There's a nice synergy there. And the other little tidbit of detail that I have about Bolae as a place is that it is thought to have been founded by the king of Alba longa. This is a little detail that comes through in Virgil's Aeneid.Dr Rad 14:00Nice. Okay. Yeah, this is I think another reason why it comes up. So not only does this situation with the Aequians mean that there is no war with the Aequians in this year. This is where our attribute of the plebs comes in. When Lucius Decius, as you said, he is trying to pass a law in which colonists would be sent to Bolae as well as Labici. But his fellow Tribune stop him from doing this and would not allow a plebiscite without the Senate saying it was okay with this idea. Insert sound effectDr G 14:41Yeah, I mean, you've caught me speechless. So they want agrarian reform in the form of colonisation. So putting people out there giving them some land so they can do their stuff, gi…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Special Episode - Disney's Hercules (1997) Sep 14, 2023
    Show notes

    This may be the best podcast episode you’ve ever heard, and that’s the gospel truth. We’re munching on protein bars and raw chicken as we discuss Disney’s Hercules (1997) with Professor Alastair Blanshard.Statue of Hercules in Shrewsbury – a copy of the Farnese Hercules. Hercules leans wearily on his club, which is covered by his lionskin. Carrying out all these labours is hard work! Courtesy of Elliot Brown on Flickr.Professor Blanshard literally wrote the book on Hercules, as well as several chapters on his representation in film. We are so lucky to have him on our show as he is not just a gigantic Hercules fanboy. He is currently the Paul Eliadis Chair of Classics and Ancient History at The University of Queensland and one of the most hilarious historians you will ever meet.The Birth of HerculesDisney’s Hercules came out during one of the most successful animated movie streaks for the studio. However, the film was a little different to the Disney Princess films such as Beauty and the Beast and The Little Mermaid. It was also pitched at a slightly older, male audience, and used the story of Hercules to explore the awkward journey from adolescence to manhood. As people have learnt about muscle development and nutrition has changed, Hercules has often been played by bodybuilders like Steeve Reeves and more recently Dwayne ‘The Rock' Johnson. Image of Steeve Reeves, courtesy of John Irving on Flickr.Disney does not always provide the most faithful representation of Hercules’ story. How do you turn a myth about a serial murderer, a drunkard and a glutton into an exploration of what it means to be a true hero? Never you fear – Disney has all the answers!This film blends stories of Hercules, such as his strangling of the snakes as a baby and the Twelve Labours, with so many other elements from contemporary American society. Whilst Hercules was not quite as successful as other Disney movies of this era, there is a lot to love about this representation. The Greeks were not afraid to rework their own mythology, and it seems like Disney followed in their footsteps.Hercules having a chat with his father in Zeus' temple at Olympia in Disney's Hercules (1997). Courtesy of Adam Hammond. Join us for this fascinating conversation about the Disneyfication of a Greek hero. We delve into the characterisation of all your favourite characters: Meg, Phil, Hades, and of course, the man of the hour.Special Episode – Disney's Hercules (1997)If you would like to read more from Professor Blanshard, you can find a list of publications on his university profile. You can also find his contributions on The Conversations here.Sound CreditsOur music is courtesy of Bettina joy de Guzman,Intelligent Speech TicketsJoin us at the Intelligent Speech Conference this year! The event will be held online on November 4. You can buy tickets here and watch the event live, or access the videos later. If you use the code PEICE at checkout, you get 10% off your tickets and they'll know that we sent you. Automated TranscriptOur automated transcript is provided by Otter AI. Dr Rad 0:00Hey there listeners at the partial Historians tell me, are you doing anything on November for? No? Well, Dr. Jean, I have just the invitation for you come along to the intelligent speech conference for 2023. And hear us and other amazing presenters talk all about the theme of the year, which is contingencies. What happens when history meets the backup plan? How intriguing does that sound? Just head along to intelligence speech online.com to buy your tickets now. And if you're worried about the time difference, never you fear you can of course, join in the event live online, but you can also watch the videos afterwards at your own convenience. So what are you waiting for? Go and grab your tickets now. And if you use the code peace, P E, I C E at the checkout, they'll know the partial history and sent you and you'll get a lovely 10% off. We hope to see you there.Welcome to the partial historians.Dr G 1:21We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 1:25Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Red.Dr G 1:36And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 1:46Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Welcome to a special episode of the partial historians. I'm one of your hosts Dr RadDr G 2:15and I am Dr. G. And we're pretty excited about the conversation that we're about to have today. I mean, personally, I'm a big Hercules fan. And that might be a little bit of foreshadowing.Dr Rad 2:28Indeed, we are so lucky to be joined by I think it's safe to say the world's largest expert on Hercules, which is Alastair Blanshard. Alastair Blanshard is the Paul Eliadis professor of classics and ancient history, as well as the author of some amazing books that you might like to get your hands on, including classics on screen and Hercules a heroic life.Dr G 2:52Thank you so much for joining us, Alastair.A Blanshard 2:54Great to be here. And I'm not sure about the largest expert, but certainly the biggest fanboy for HerculesDr Rad 3:00that makes you the expert in our book. So we're gonna be talking about Disney's Hercules in particular today, which is really great for us because we've been revisiting a lot of classic films, and so Hercules naturally fits right in. But before we dive straight into the Disney version of things, it's probably good to give our listeners a bit of background on who Hercules actually is, or dare I say, Herakles.Speaker 3 3:24Yes, absolutely. So, Herakles, as he's known amongst the Greeks, and Hercules, as he's called by the Romans was probably the most popular of the ancient heroes. Certainly his worship is found throughout the Mediterranean from signs in the far corners of Spain all the way through to Southern France. Indeed, the modern Principality of Monaco is actually named after in fact, a temple dedicated to Hercules, Hercules monoikos, Hercules, the man who lives alone, and so monoikos becomes Monaco, but to his worship continues, obviously in Greece all the way through the Black Sea to all be our panic a pm no places where modern day Ukraine is. And of course, there are important sanctuary sites in Lebanon, North Africa. So throughout the Mediterranean, Hercules was a figure that was well known and well respected and worship.Dr Rad 4:17Absolutely. I seem to recall some Roman emperors letting to dress up like Hercules and run around arenas, and we were just actually talking about little NAS X and his music video for call me by your name and how he might be dressed up as Hercules but like a baby pink Hercules?A Blanshard 4:35Well, we'll Look at don't even get me started on that video clip because that is for a classicist, or one of the greatest clips ever. I mean, not only does it include all the coliseums type scenes, him dressed up as characters, but also a quotation in actual Greek from Plato's Symposium as well, from Aristophanes speech about the nature of the soul and how it's looking for its long lost partner. So So for a classicist that that is the film clip to end all film clips,Dr G 5:03it is basically catnip for classicists.A Blanshard 5:08Who knew that that was the market he was going for? It's doneDr G 5:11really well, we now all talk about it. And we have a great time and all of us kind of like, we just want to meet him and sit down and have a good chat about it.A Blanshard 5:19Yes, I really want to know who chose that passage from the symposium because it's so perfect in terms of the concept of the song. But also the decision to carve it onto the tree in in Greek is really, really striking.Dr Rad 5:33I know we were speaking to Yentl love about X, we've tried a special FSA just on that one particular clip. And we were asking her like, Where does this come from? Like, who is working on this? Is this all from him? Like, who are the people that he's consulting with?Dr G 5:46And also, how do we get a job? But to drag it back to Hercules inherently, he's thinking about the sort of how he's positioned in the ancient world? What are some of the sort of key touchstones in the mythology that surrounds this figure so that we can set up a sort of a comparison between what the sort of the ancient Greeks and the ancient Mediterranean world thought about this figure and the stories they told and how that might end up comparing to what Disney presents us with?A Blanshard 6:15Yeah, absolutely. And that's a very, very good question. And it's a really interesting question to ask for Heroclix because one of the things about Hara Cleves is because he's worshipped in so many different places, there are so many different stories. And so we imagine really, that the mythology around Hercules was enormous, every place would have had its own little Hercules story, its own variation about how hurricanes came to their town often established, you know, an important institution or, or a right. And so really, in fact, the myths that we have about hurricanes that have come down to us are probably in the tip of a huge iceberg of stories that would have been circulating in in antiquity, I guess, in terms of thinking about the grand narratives to occupy Hercules as life that I think I guess there are, there are probably a couple of kind of key points. And obviously the 12 labours is a is a central point. And these were the 12 labours that Hercules had to perform as expiation for the murder of his wife and children. And that's a topic I think, we'll get into discussing, particularly when we come to the Herrick Lee's film because it's totally glossed over. But Hercules, the wife killer, the child killer, has to wash the blood from his hands. And He does this by performing a number of labours for King Eurystheus. That's you. I guess one of the great central themes or stories that relates to Hercules would live there are a number of other other kinds of stories, there's a story about his eventual death where he is poisoned effectively by a woman who loved him, dear Naira, who accidentally thinking that she's going to make her clothes love her by applying a love potion to his clothes is in fact tricked into applying a kind of burning poison to his close. And so he dies in agony, and his eventual soul is sent to the heavens where it's worshipped as the divine as a divine figure. I guess that's one of the important stories. I guess the other sort of important story is the story about his birth, which again, was a kind of very important one. So again, it's a story that the Disney film isn't particularly keen on, on showing because it's all a story about adultery and deceit, and involves Hercules being the product of Zeus or Jupiter, coming down to earth, falling in love with a woman by the name of Alcmene and then appearing to her while her husband's away in the form of her husband. And he then sleeps with her, and she thinks she's sleeping with them photo on her husband. Now, in modern days, this would be rape, right? This is a classic case of what lawyers would call rate by personation. And this is, you know, you consent achieved by deceit, but the ancient world didn't see this as right. They saw this as just a very convenient ruse on the part on the part of Jupiter. And indeed, they even played it for comic effect. So for example, plotters in the play in vitro, has this as a kind of comic setup with their people going, are you in vitro? No, you're in vitro and they play it for kind of laughs now. Now, you can play it for laughs The Greeks also played it for tragedy. So in fact, we know that there is a fragmentary tragedy, the Alcmene which takes a scenario and which has Amphitryon arriving back at home to discover that his wife has been sleeping with another man. He doesn't believe her claims that she thought she was sleeping with her husband. And in fact, he puts on her pilot and is about to set fire to an incinerator alive when in fact that Zeus appears and sorts everything out. But this extraordinary birth story of Hercules who is the product of this rape by deceit could be played for both comic effects and tragic effects in the in the ancient world. but those are I think those are I think the three stories, the birth, the 12 Labours and the death, I think are probably the three key elements in the Hercules narrative.Dr Rad 10:08Yeah, and like most Greek myths, I think it doesn't automatically scream made for children in this modern age, because there is just so much murder and violence and trickery and adultery and all sorts of issues that run all throughout Hercules.A Blanshard 10:25Yes, okay. Anyone who started to tell a Greek myth for children suddenly finds themselves having to gloss over over things. And the numbers of nightmares. I've given my poor nieces and nephews, as I've told them stories of the ancient world, it's really, really too many to name.Dr Rad 10:42And yes, I suppose, where all the products are being told Greek myths.Dr G 10:47Yeah, it's it's really interesting that there is obviously so much violence at the centre of these stories. And I think that's it's definitely not uncommon for the ancient world to sort of have these sort of like lessons that are really sort of bruntly felt upon the body as much as upon the psyche. And yet, somehow, Disney has thought, you know, what would be a great tale to tell on the animated screen, the life of a hero? And who better to choose then Hercules?A Blanshard 11:18Yeah, it's absolutely extraordinary, as you say, I mean, Hercules, Hercules is the figure that in fact, the ancient world does a lot of thinking about in terms of violence, right. So he's the figure, in fact, who was so violent, so bloody in terms of his actions, that in fact, the Delphic Oracle refuses to wash his hands of blood. So he turns up having murdered a whole series of people again, and turns up to the Delphic Oracle and says, Look, you know, once again, sorry, kill have killed a lot of people, can you wash the blood of my hands? Can you make me once again, clean and the Delphic Oracle says, No, not this time, I'm just sick of you turning up here, completely covered in Gore, having just murdered a whole lot of people, we're not going to do it this time. And Hercules is outraged. He grabs the tripod, on which the Oracle sits and he says, I'm gonna go establish my own oracle that will allow me to be cleansed whenever I need it, which is obviously a lot. And at this point, Apollo appears, and wrestles the tripod back from Hercules and we have this in a lot of ancient art. There are a lot of ancient artistic depictions of Apollo and heroically is wrestling over the Delphic tripod. Now, what's interesting is that Zeus intervenes, and he sends a thunderbolt which splits the two and, and he says to Apollo, Look, it's your job to purify those who commit crimes. So yes, you're going to have to purify again. And so establishes the principle that in fact, you know, there's no crime for which you shouldn't be able to get purification from it's important Greek principle. And, and it's Hara Cleves, who becomes as it were the, the test case for this, that if you could, if you can cleanse Heroclix of blood, then basically you can cleanse anyone,Dr G 13:10goodness me, I felt like when you were talking about that kind of detail, it just put me in mind of like, where Roman Catholicism ends up. And I was like, Oh, that's a fascinating sort of, anyway, I don't want to go down that rabbit hole. But nevertheles…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Divide and Conquer Aug 31, 2023
    Show notes

    We return to the 410s BCE to explore some classic Conflict of the Orders. This one will end with an evil patrician plan (mwahahaha) to divide and conquer their plebeian foes.Episode 141 – Divide and ConquerSome Unfinished BusinessThe Romans had been engaged in battle with the Aequians when we last checked in on them. Due to some slappy fighting between the military tribunes with consular power, a dictator had been called in to get this military campaign back on track.Quintus Servilius was chosen for their role, and he took his son along for the ride. Fortunately for this father-son duo, the Aequians were getting sloppy. Servilius took full advantage of their overconfidence and whipped the Romans into shape. He even ordered the death of a slightly hesitant standard-bearer! With the stern Servilius Snr in charge, the Romans manage to turn the tables on their enemies.Roman standards were considered to be sacred by the legions. It is most unusual that the dictator ordered the death of a standard-bearer on the spot! Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. The Land from LabiciThanks to the defeat of the Labicani and the Aequians, the Romans finally have some new territory on their hands. Terrified that the tribunes of the plebs might try to redistribute the land, the Senate quickly established a colony in the new area.Trouble from the TribunesThe senators were probably right to be afraid, as two tribunes decided to put forward a new agrarian law. Land taken from the enemies of Rome should be split up and divvied up between the citizens. Cue some more Conflict of the Orders!The patricians were alarmed by this outrageous proposal. The descendent of uber—patrician royalty, Appius Claudius, was there to steer the patricians down a nefarious path. It was time to take the tribunes of the plebs on; to divide and conquer… Things To Look Out For: Random facts about our family historyUs once again casting doubt on early Roman historical accountsClass traitors… always look out for class traitors!Classic Conflict of the Orders narratives Our Players 418 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerLucius Sergius C. f. C. n. Fidenas (Pat), previously consul in 437, 429; and previously military tribune with consular power in 433, 424Marcus Papirius L. f. -. n. Mugillanus (Pat)Gaius Servilius Q. f. C. n. Axilla (Pat), previously consul in 427, military tribune with consular power in the previous year 419DictatorQuintus Servilius P. f. Sp. n. Priscus Fidenas (Pat)Master of the HorseGaius Servilius Q. f. C. n. Axilla (Pat) – upgraded from military tribune with consular power!CensorLucius Papirius L. f. -. n. Mugillanus (Pat). Previously consul in 427 and military tribune with consular power 422.Our Players 417 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerP. Lucretius Hosti f. – n. Tricipitinus (Pat) Mil. Tr. c.p. 419Agrippa Menenius T.f. Agripp. n. Lanatus (Pat) Cos. 439, Mil. Tr. c.p. 419C. Servilius Q. f. C. n. Axilla (or Structus) (Pat) Cos. 427, Mil. Tr. c.p. 419, 418Sp. Rutilius Crassus ORSp. Veturius Sp. f. Sp. n. Crassus Cicurinus (Pat)Our Players 416 BCEMilitary Tribunes with Consular PowerA.Sempronius L. f. A. n. Atratinus (Pat) Cos. 428b, Mil. Tr. c.p. 425, 420.M. Papirius L. f. – n. Mugillanus (Pat) Cos. 411, Mil. Tr. c.p. 418Q. Fabius Q. f. M. n. Vibulanus (Pat) Cos. 423, Mil. Tr. c.p. 414 Sp. Nautius Sp. f. Sp. n. Rutilus (Pat) Cos. 411, Mil. Tr. c.p. 419, 404Tribunes of the PlebsS. Maecilius(M.) MetiliusOur SourcesDr G reads Fasti Capitolini, Fasti Minores (CIL 1(2).1,p 55, no.1); Diodorus Siculus 13.2.1; 13.7.1; 13.9.1Dr Rad reads Livy ab Urbe Condita 4.45-49Broughton, T. R. S., Patterson, M. L. 1951. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic Volume 1: 509 B.C. – 100 B.C. (The American Philological Association) Cornell, T. J. 1995. The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC) (Taylor & Francis) Holloway, R. Ross. 2008. ‘Who Were the “Tribuni Militum Consulari Potestate?”‘ L'Antiquite Classique 77, 107-125.Forsythe, G. 2006. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War(University of California Press) Ogilvie, R. M. 1965. A Commentary on Livy: Books 1-5 (Clarendon Press). Sound CreditsOur music was composed by Bettina Joy de Guzman. Sound effects are courtesy of BBC Beta.Automated TranscriptCourtesy of Otter AI. Dr Rad 0:12Welcome to the partial historians.Dr G 0:15We explore all the details of ancient Rome.Dr Rad 0:20Everything from political scandals to love affairs, the battles waged, and when citizens turn against each other. I'm Dr. Rad.Dr G 0:30And I'm Dr. G. We consider Rome as the Roman saw it by reading different ancient authors and comparing their accounts.Dr Rad 0:41Join us as we trace the journey of Rome from the founding of the city.Dr G 0:59Hello, and welcome to a brand new episode of the partial historians. I am one of your hosts, Dr. G.Dr Rad 1:08And I'm very excited Dr. Racks are trying out a new setup.Dr G 1:12This may or may not succeed,Dr Rad 1:15it's gonna be the most interesting episode audio logically,Dr G 1:20we want to say a huge shout out thank you to our patrons, because it is through their support that we were able to invest in some new equipment, and everybody's gonna hear the results for better or worse.Dr Rad 1:34We are audio geniuses, of course, it's going to work out it's going to be amazing. Just your way. Yes. Now strategy, we are tracing the journey of hearing from the founding of the city. And I owe you and all of our listeners a big apology. Oh, did you break the history of Rome from the value of the city somehow I may just have. So last episode, I left you all on a cliffhanger, our dictator of 418 BC about to march out into battle. And I said I was finishing there because I thought we were heading into a new year. Turns out I was wrong. Oh no, I got confused. Because you see 417 and 416 are blended together. But 418 is in fact quite distinct.Dr G 2:18I have terrible news for you. You're gonna have to hand back in your PhD.Dr Rad 2:23I'll just be rad.I hate it. I'm sorry. All right. So when we do the recap, therefore this episode, I am going to not only recap what happened last time, but also add some more information. Oh, excellent. All right. Well, let's get into where were we up to in this narrative anyway?Well, so I believe we were up to 418 BCE last episode, and we ended up with some military Tribune's with consular power who could not get along to save themselves.Tragedy. Yeah, Look, you know, arguments abound, poor strategic decisions were made. It wasn't great. And there was a man who was the father of one of these gentleman Quintus Servilius.Sounds like I'm making fun of him whenever I use that V. ButDr G 3:12I mean, that's his name.Dr Rad 3:15I know, it just sounds funny. Like what does ServiliusDr G 3:18Is he asking for ridicule? perhaps, especially if I add on Quintus Servilius, Priscus Fidenas.Dr Rad 3:26So this guy had seen that there was going to be travelled because he it's actually only been what like maybe six or seven years, maybe eight Max, since we last had an issue where the commanders were arguing, and it led to military disaster for room. So he sees the writing on the wall, allegedly. And he basically makes sure that he and his son are going to be there and prepared to kind of step in and handle the situation, which he thinks is going to arise which is military disaster for the Romans.Dr G 4:00This is a typical elitist plan. Not only is he going to get himself into power, he's going to bring his son along with him, and it's all going to be great. It does seem suspicious that he and his son are the ones that you know, come in to do the whole here we come to save the day thing.Dr Rad 4:16I mean, yeah, I have some concerns. But you know, for 18 being what it is chaotic, fine, fine. Yes, exactly. So, essentially, the way that they did this is they made sure that not every available man had been sent out to face the Romans enemies who I should add the Aequians and the people of Labici.Dr G 4:39The Labicani, Yes, who re entered the narrative as one of the sort of like surrounding neighbours, who was a little bit upset with Rome for the way that Rome has treated them over and over again. And I think from what you said last time, they've been nursing this garage for almost 100 years now, pretty much as soon as the Republic is started. They've been upset.Dr Rad 5:02Oh No.Yeah, exactly. So in 418 BC last episode, we finished up with the dictator Quintus Servilius and his master of the horse, which is his son, therefore, another Servilius marching out together to face the enemy with fresh troops after things predictably not going so well for the Romans. Yeah, yes, coming in to save the day. Exactly. Now, I did hint that the Aequians were in for some trouble at the end of last episode because they had been doing so well against the Romans because you know, the Romans are just too busy fighting too will fight each other I should say then to fightthat they also started to get sloppy.the results of this was seen immediately. Dr. G. In the very first battle, you can see that the Aequians and their allies, the people of the Labicani are off their game,Dr G 6:00A little bit of a mess, a hot mess waiting to happen in the Castelli Romani region.Dr Rad 6:05Yeah, so the dictator Quintus Sebelius, he goes into battle leading hard with the cavalry, and the cavalry caused the entire front line of the Aequians to be disrupted. They're in chaos, Dr. G.Speaker 2 6:20Well, a dictator shows up and everybody runs for the hills, basically. Now this guy is super hardcore, because wait till I add this detail. So once they've sent the frontlines of the Aequians and the leper colony into chaos, he orders that the Romans sort of quick march and just advance quickly, I guess the idea being sort of overwhelmed them as fast as possible. And apparently one of the standard bearers kind of like hesitates. Now, I don't know if this means he's like, Wait, left, right? Where are we going? I don't know what hesitation he's giving like, did he cry..?Dr Rad 6:52Can we stop for for gelato? Guys, because I really need a break right now. Yeah, I don't know what the hesitation was. But whatever it was Servilius dictator does not take it kindly, and he has him killed on the spot.Dr G 7:04I would have thought that would be a bad omen. The standard bearer is a very important person. They're looking after the standard.Dr Rad 7:11I know, it seems so weird, but he was like he's getting cut down on the spot.Dr G 7:16I feel like the Romans who had viewed that would be shocked and traumatised.Dr Rad 7:21Well, apparently they're very excited. Dr. G. That's what they are very excited.Dr G 7:25These people will never cease to amaze me with their horrors.Dr Rad 7:28They're just like, You know what, we're just gonna give it our all. And so the Aequians and the leper colony quickly overwhelmed, they lose the battle, they flee the battlefield, they run back to their camp. Oh, how the tables have turned.Dr G 7:41So you're telling me that in the time of you've got to like get the troops roused up somehow that the best way to do that is to kill one of their own?Dr Rad 7:48Well, I don't know if they're excited because of the standard bearer staff. They're just excited because it seems that they're doing well, I think. Yeah, and I think they apparently invigorated by the energy of Quintus Servilius which is Stern.Dr G 8:03So invigorating, exactly.Dr Rad 8:06Silverfox Yeah, so wiliest, sir. Yes, sir. Yeah, so the Romans are able to quite easily also capture the camp of the enemy. And of course, within the camp, there are many spoils she hadDr G 8:19Oh, booty,Dr Rad 8:20It is bootay time.Dr G 8:23I wonder where that leather armour went?Dr Rad 8:25Yes. As we've often pointed out, because they are fighting the same people and over again, we really feel like their possessions are just in rotation.Dr G 8:32It is tough out there. It takes a long time to make a full suit of armour. Yeah, of course, you want to steal it back.Dr Rad 8:37So Servilius, I guess to show his gratitude says that the soldiers may have the bootyDr G 8:43very generous.Dr Rad 8:44I know, I know. Now the Roman cavalry. Meanwhile, they are hard at work. They are chasing the Aequians with the remaining ones, I suppose as they run away from the camp. They've just been running all day or stuff out there. I mean, they're in a hilly region. It's not like this is an easy run. I know. And they come back and inform our dictator Servilius that the remaining Aequians and the Labicani who've managed to survive the slaughter up until this moment are all hiding in Labici.Dr G 9:15Yeah, fair enough. I mean, that's where I would hide as well with Rome's known enemy, who was also involved in the battle, but currently not being chased. Best place to hideDr Rad 9:23so the Romans march off to Labici The next day, have a good rest beforehand. They quickly encircled us letters to get over the walls and completely ravaged this city. Oh, yeah. It's all in a very.Dr G 9:39I didn't even have a reaction to that. I'm just like, really? That's it?Dr Rad 9:43Because Livy's very precise in his details here. So Servilius marches back to room with his triumphant army and once he gets there, he hands back his powers and he had been dictator live. He tells me for a total of eightDr G 9:55days. Wow, this is an exceptionally false cat. In pain I know, right? I mean, it would take at least until lunch on the first date of March there.Dr Rad 10:05Yeah. So it's considering that it's built up as being obviously, you know, a potential disaster for Rome, typically a bit suspiciously. The Romans bounce back very quickly and very easily.Dr G 10:15This is their way they love a good bounce back is it'sDr Rad 10:18just the way that the history has been written.Dr G 10:24I cannot possibly comment at this time.Dr Rad 10:27I demand answers. Now, obviously, we actually finally have a bit of expansion on our hand strategy,Dr G 10:35do we we do Oh, my goodness. And still in 418? Yeah,Dr Rad 10:39yeah. This is Oh, 418. Oh, yeah. So the Senate concerned because we now have the city of Labici in our evil imperialist clause. But there are concerns because you know, who else would like to have Labici?Dr G 10:56Is it the Aequians? No. I mean, the people who used to live there are lotsDr Rad 11:02of people that would like to have it. But I mean, within Rome. Oh, nice. Like toDr G 11:07have people who would most like to have it in a row? Yeah. The military traders who control the power,Dr Rad 11:12kind of, but the people that the Senate are most concerned about are, of course, the tribune of the plebs and the people themselves. Wow, that makes sense. Yeah, they're very concerned that they're going to start buying off all this new land that's coming in from the Labican territory, so they very quickly hold a meeting and determined that they will establish a colonyDr G 11:34there. So land distribution is not on the table. Well,Dr Rad 11:38I think that's what they foresee. And they're like, No,Dr G 11:42that's not on my whatDr Rad 11:44No. So 1500 colonists are sent from Rome to this new colony. And they are apparently given five eighthsWe of an acre.Dr G 11:54Well, that's pretty good. That's more than people get today.Dr Rad 11:57Well apparently, my commentator thinks that the amount that is specified in Livy, would not be enough for a family to survive on and therefore, it's not really correct that he thinks they would have been given a lot more.Dr G 12:12Yeah, it is problematic. It might be enough for one person to grow some things but…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 23 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History

    1

    Dan Carlin’s Hardcore History History
    More Perfect

    2

    More Perfect Government
    Casefile True Crime

    3

    Casefile True Crime Games & Hobbies
    The Way I Heard It with Mike Rowe

    4

    The Way I Heard It with Mike Rowe History
    BackStory

    5

    BackStory History
    The Black Dahlia Serial Killers

    6

    The Black Dahlia Serial Killers History
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights