TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Business

    The “Daily Call” From Option Alpha

    Join Kirk Du Plessis on The “Daily Call”, created and dedicated to you, the options trader, stock market investors or trading wannabe. This is your daily dose of actionable advice, tips, and strategies to help you learn how to generate and earn income investing with options.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    #340 - Why BROKERS Platforms Suck! (And What I'm Doing About It) Aug 28, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, I'm going to talk about why broker's platforms suck and what we are going to do about it. This honestly has become to me, a really nagging thing and that is that I have to explain to people all the time why one broker or another broker can't do something. This happens with Thinkorswim, this happens with Tastyworks, with Trade Station, with Schwab, with Robinhood, everything and I feel like I have to always explain why their broker platform to some degree and in some areas, sucks what they do really well, but what they really suck at. And it's hard because a lot of these broker platforms are not built for the full-time options trader or for the person who's focused on full-time options trading.

    One of the things that we've been doing and we'll be releasing very soon in the next month, month and a half here has been our own platform for auto-trading. Now, it's not going to be just auto-trading. It's going to have all of the capacity to scan, monitor and more importantly, auto-trade and analyze your positions moving forward. Now, we'll have more details on this coming out, but that's literally what we're trying to do, is we're trying to build the platform that I know I want, that I know you guys want because I hear it all the time. I hear all the complaints about reporting. They don't know. Many platforms especially Thinkorswim right now, we don't understand if we're really making money or not. If we are, what positions are making money and which are not? Are we doing good trading credit spreads or not? How do we know? And many of these broker platforms just kind of shrug this off and that really ticks me off now because they're making a lot of money off of commissions and off of fees and everything and they just shrug off a lot of the stats that really could be important and could lead people to making smarter decisions and smarter trades and basically allocating their money with better information. We're trying to build that. I think that's a big push for me lately. Now that we've got a really amazing team of developers and people leading this and helping me out with this, we're really going to push the forefront here and build something that's revolutionary, I mean, something that's intuitive, easy to use and more importantly, super, super powerful, data-driven, I mean, all the things that we've been wanting in this industry for a long time.

    I would say that the point of me doing this show is not only just to tell you guys what we've been working on, but I think that right now, where we're at in this industry is that a lot of people have been settling for subpar technology and that has ticked me off for the last couple of years. And so, I've been investing a lot of my own personal money. A lot of the money that we generate from Option Alpha goes right back into investing in this type of technology for you guys, so that we have something that we can catch up to a lot of other markets and industries. The brokerage industry and the investment industry is very old-school. It takes a long time to move this ship in many respects. And you look at the Thinkorswim platform which hasn't had a major update since it was basically purchased by TD Ameritrade, I mean, think about it. It has not really had a major update to that platform since it was purchased from TD Ameritrade. That's crazy. And a lot of these platforms now are just recreations of the same thing. And so, we're doing something completely different, way more intuitive, much easier to use and of course, naturally integrates all of our auto-trading and AI technology that we've already built out. It's going to be amazing. I can't wait for you guys to see it because a lot of the other platforms out there suck right now and we're hoping to change that big time. Hopefully this helps out. If you guys have any questions or want to learn more about it, obviously just stay tuned. We'll be doing some more shows and some more podcast as we get much closer to the launch here. But it is coming. It's very much well worth the wait and hopefully you guys are really excited about it. Until next time, happy trading.


    #339 - Losing Too Much Money Trading? Solve This 1 Problem First Aug 27, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to help answer this question and that is – If you're losing too much money trading, you need to solve this one problem first. I truly mean that it's one problem. You only have one real major issue when it comes to trading and that trading problem that you need to solve is better order entry and that's truly it. Now, that encompasses a lot of things, so I don't want to oversimplify and say, "Hey. You just need to make better entries." That encompasses a lot of different aspects which I can quickly touch on. But the idea here is that if you are doing a bad job trading and you're losing money, it's probably because you're just flat out entering the wrong trades. Now, I see this a lot because the concept here is that better order entry saves you from having to do all the other things that you are probably doing right now and it allows you to focus on the most important, biggest leverage item that you can do. What I see people doing all the time is they make a trade and then they spend 90% of their energy and time on fixing the bad trade. Well, if it's a bad trade to begin with, you can only do so much to improve that trade. We've heard of the analogy of like lipstick on a pig. You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig at the end of the day. The core of what it is has never changed.

    When it comes to trading, better order entry saves you from having to do all the other things really well, like adjustments, closing. Just make better entries and that takes care of 90% of the issues that you probably have. Better entries means – Check your position size. Check your portfolio balance. Are you selling options versus buying options? Are you trying to be as non-directional as possible overall? Do you have good diversification of tickers or are you trading everything in the same industry? It's these little things that honestly are very, very easy fixes and allow you to frankly be lazy on a lot of other things and still be successful. Again, if you're losing too much money trading options, I encourage you just to revisit some of the orders that you've placed. We all know and we've been there. I mean, myself included. You've placed orders and you're like, "You know what? That was stupid. I shouldn't have done that." We've been there. It's okay. We're adults. Let's own up to it and let's try to make better, smarter, more profitable trades from the start. Don't try to fix bad trades that have gone wrong. If it's a bad trade, there's only so much you can do. It's bad at its core. It's like apple. It's like if there's a bad apple, you can't do anything to improve the apple if it's bad at its core. It's just a bad piece of fruit. Throw it out. Move onto the next one.

    Hopefully that helps out. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know. If you have any comments or questions for the show, head on over to optionalpha.com/ask and leave me a voicemail there. Again, that's the best place to leave us a question that we can get queued up here for the daily podcast or for the live streams that we've been doing every single day on Facebook and on YouTube. Until next time happy, trading.


    #338 - Protecting The Golden Eggs And The Goose Aug 26, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be talking about protecting the golden eggs and the goose that lays those golden eggs at the same time. This is honestly one of my favorite stories. I think about this story all the time when it comes to investing and trading and just generally in life. I think this is a good story and it comes out of seven habits of highly effective people. If you haven't read that yet, it's definitely one of my, I guess top five books. I've read it three times now. I have it on audio. I listen to it all the time, at the gym when I'm working out, when I go for walks, if I'm just sitting in the morning and kind of doing my meditation routine. I listen to that book all the time. One of the stories that he tells in there is the story about a farmer. And so, this farmer finds this golden goose who's laying all these eggs. And so, every day, the farmer goes out and the goose has laid a golden egg and obviously, the farmer is really happy about this. And so, every day, he goes out and he collects this egg from the golden goose. Well, eventually, the farmer just gets really impatient and irrational and goes and kills the goose, anticipating that if he just kills the goose that there's all these golden eggs on the inside and he can just basically take all these golden eggs at one time. Well, what he doesn't know is that in killing the goose, he's removed that asset that is then laying the golden eggs. It's a classic, I guess parable or story or example of why we have to be so protective over our assets that generate enough income for us to live. And so, I think about this all the time because I live off of the income that I generate from trading. Whether that income is down for a year or my assets are down for a year or my assets are up or flat, I still take my same draw that I've taken for years from our trading account.

    When I think about this, your trading account, your nest egg is the golden goose. I don't know why they call it a nest egg. They should call it the nest goose. I mean, it's like that is your productive mass that generates the income and cash flow and the trading that you do is the capacity to earn and that's one of our biggest assets. But the problem is that if you kill off your goose, if you allow yourself to be irrational, not patient, not confident, you don't follow the risk and tolerance rules that we lay out here at Option Alpha, don't keep your position size small, etcetera, you'll eventually end up killing off your golden goose which removes any production capability that you might have for generating income in the future. Ask somebody. "Hey. How much money can I generate in income if I have $0?" Well, zero. You can't generate anything trading if you don't have enough capital to even start. I think this is a really interesting concept. I'm telling you. I think about this all the time and I think hopefully it sparks some sort thought process in your head or a reminder in your head to protect what you have, protect the goose. The goose is what allows you the ability to go and take a golden egg every single day. In down markets, we have to protect ourselves. In up markets, we have to protect ourselves. Position sizing, portfolio allocation, balance, all of these things tie right back into the story about protecting the goose or you're going to end up starving yourself, basically on no income in the future. Hopefully this helps out. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    #337 - Top 6 Longest Bull Markets For Stocks Aug 25, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha. Welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be talking about why this market that we are in right now just became one of the top six longest bull markets for stocks. I want to spend a little bit of time going through some of the data on the top six longest running bull markets in really, kind of our modern era or modern history. Basically, going back to 1950 is where we pulled all this data from. And so, we took a look at all these bull market runs and kind of analyzed them. And so, we put together the top six or so with these bull markets and the one we are in this month just crossed through and has become the longest-running market ever that we've ever had, the longest bullish expansion that we've ever had. Now, of course, this can always continue on further, but you just have to ask yourself what's the risk reward features of the market that we're in and where does that change your dynamic if you're a long-term equity investor.

    There's six of these kind of eras really. There's the postwar boom back after the World War II ended, there is the 70s, the Reagan era and the 80s, the 90s leading up to the dot com, there's the housing bubble crash and kind of the expansion that was again, the housing bubble back in 2004, 2005, 2006, etcetera and then this one which is just kind of post great recession expansion. I don't even know what we're going to call it. Whenever it crashes, we'll usually get some sort of name. The first one which we'll go backwards in time here and kind of look backwards-forwards… But the first one is the postwar. This began really after World War II and lasted 86 months, so it was actually quite a long period of time that lasted all the way up until August of 1956, so quite a long time. It lasted a couple of years, seven plus years that era lasted and of course, the market went up during that time period 267%. Now, in the 70s, we had an expansion period from about October of 1974 all the way up until November of 1980 and that lasted 74 months. The market was up during that time period 126%. During the Reagan era, kind of that great expansion of the Reagan era that everyone talks about, the market had a bullish run of 60 months from August, 1982 all the way up till August, 1987. The market was up 229% during that time period. And then the time between basically the market crash that we had in the 2000 dot com bubble era, the market was up about 101% or so during about a 60 month time period. Just about five months, the market ran and again, that was the lows around 2002 in August till the market topped out in October of 2007.

    Now, the one I left out here and I want to compare to the current run is the one that looks most similar to what we're dealing with right now and that is the great expansion that we had during the 1990s leading into basically the dot com bubble. Now, during that time period, the market went on one of its longest streaks which was 114 months, so basically 9 1/2 years of continuous movement up in the market which was pretty much an incredible feat for sure. And when you overlay both of these graphs together, both the great expansion and the one that we're in right now, kind of this post great recession market run, they look very similar. I mean, it's almost scary similar how they look. But the one in the 1990s that ended with the dot com bubble, the market ended up 118% mostly because of dot com, obviously, mostly because of all the hype around tech and it kind of crashed pretty hard, but it lasted 114 months. Well, this month, we just crossed over about 114 months on the current expansion and the market's up over 305%, 306% depending on how you calculate it with the S&P. The market's been up considerably and has now lasted longer than the one that we had back in 2000 when it ended in the crash in around 2000. We're in right now, one of the longest stretches of history of expansion and obviously, it's fueled by central banks and low interest rates, etcetera, all this post great recession expansion that we have had. Whether it's on paper or whether it's actually true, who knows? Well, time will tell and see where things go. But I think it's important to keep these in the back of your mind especially as we continue to move forward in the next couple of years.

    Many people in this market right now have not traded through a recession or a drawdown, a significant drawdown in the market and that to me is a little frightening. I think people are going to be shocked to see how fast and how violently things can move down. But we've seen just in the last let's call it last year for the S&P 500, is a lot of volatility, but it's really a blip compared to what could happen if the markets really go crazy. Take this time to kind of do a gut check and just ask yourself. Do we really think that this is going to continue for another nine years? Probably not. Maybe another year or two or three? I don't know when it's going to end. I mean, it definitely could continue to move much, much further than where it is right now. I have no crystal ball, but the risk reward at these levels continues to be insane especially if you're an equity trader, so you should be an options trader and it gives you the flexibility and the advantage of being dynamic enough to change with the market. We're only trading 40, 60 days out, so we have the ability to adjust and hedge and move our position around wherever stocks go. Hopefully this was helpful. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    #336 - Geography Bias Investing Is A Real Thing Aug 24, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be talking about geography bias investing and why it actually is a real thing. Now, you may have not ever heard of this, but the idea behind geography bias investing is that people who live in different parts of the country here in the US or even different parts of the world have completely different investing biases based on where they live. You would think to yourself, "Well, okay. That makes rational sense if I live in a town that is say Silicon Valley in California. I might be more up to invest in technology." But on the other hand, people you would think are more rational in a sense that everyone would invest in say the indexes or they would try to invest in the same general broad global portfolio. But one quote that I've heard before… I don't know if I'm going to butcher the quote or not, but it's the idea that if everybody owns everything, then nobody owns anything. And so, this idea behind that is that when we think that we understand the psychology of all investing participants, we have it completely backwards. In fact, I would even relate this to say when many times I've gone through webinars and I've done trainings for people on options trading, the natural reaction is – Well, if options trading works so well, why doesn't everybody do it? And the answer is that they just don't. They have other biases or they have other agendas or they just don't know or they don't understand. It doesn't mean it doesn't work. It's just that it's not as widely dispersed and even if it was, people still might have a bias to do something different. They still might have a bias to be option buyers and try to get these outsized gains and go for the homerun every time.

    On the geography bias thing, there are a couple of little stats I'll share. These come from the Visual Capitalist, so you can go to their website and check that out. They've got some great stuff on geography bias. But one of the things that they do is they put together this geography bias by area of the country, so West Coast, deep South, Northeast, Midwest, etcetera. What they found is that if you live on the West Coast, you are 20% more likely to own technology versus the South and Midwest, so companies like Apple, Facebook, etcetera which is crazy, but again, logical. Like just the actual physical location of your home, you are 20% more likely to own tech. It could be good, it could be bad, but it's pretty interesting. If you live in the South, you're 26% more likely to own energy stocks from the golf, so Exxon, Chevron, etcetera compared to the rest of the country. Again, makes sense because your physical location is closer to that style of industry. If you are on the East Coast, you are up to 23% more likely to invest in financials, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan, all Wall Street type companies, financial institutions because you're much closer to New York. And if you're in the Midwest, you are 26% more likely to invest in industrial companies like GE, Caterpillar, etcetera. It's really, really interesting that just your physical location on this planet has a lot to do potentially with how you have biases against investing.

    And where I think this is prevalent for us as options traders is when we get into a position and say we sell a call option or sell a put option, sometimes people will say, "Well, why isn't everybody taking this trade? It's so obvious that the stock is going to go down or that the stock is going to go up." But then I always ask like, "Is it really obvious? Maybe there are people who have a completely different opinion and to them, it's so obvious that the stock is going to go the other way, hence why they would take that position." I think there's always going to be a market for this dynamic. That's why I don't think we're never going to lose an edge in the market selling options because there's always going to be somebody who has a different opinion from us and in this case, that different opinion just could be based on purely where they live, where do they live in the country versus the world. It's really, really interesting stuff. I encourage you to go through some of this stuff and just… Again, it's another food for thought type of show for me. Just keep this in the back of your mind that biases can be based on anything. They can be based on age, they can be based on schooling, they can be based on where you live in the country or what month you were born. I mean, there are so many different things that make up this market which allows us the opportunity to have such a dynamic and efficient market back and forth where the numbers work out time and time again because none of this stuff will ever change. It will just shift from sector to sector and company to company, but it will always continue to be there. These biases are never going to go away. It's just human nature. As always, hopefully this helps out and until next time, happy trading.


    #335 - You'll NEVER Be Great At Something You Only Do Once Aug 23, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be talking about why you'll never be great at something you only do once. I don't actually know where this came from. I had it written down on my notebook and I was just kind of reviewing it just the other day and I've scripted this out to have this call today and talk about it because I wanted to revisit this because I think it's an important topic not only for trading, but just generally, I guess. If you do know who is, I guess the author of this quote, let me know because I couldn't find it online. I tried to search. Usually that does the trick. But I don't know who said this first. But it's a great quote and it's really important on the options trading side because what I think I see a lot of people do is they try really, really hard and I respect this. They try really hard to understand the markets. They try really hard to get into their first couple of trades, setup their account and do all the backend kind of office admin stuff to get going. But then they only make one or two trades and they honestly give up very early in the cycle. Maybe they even make a handful of trades and then one single thing goes wrong, one thing goes bad, they have one bad losing trade or the stock doesn't move as perfectly as they dreamed in their mind and then they give up.

    I think the reality here is that we've never seen anybody in any profession on any planet be amazing at something and they only did it one-time. If somebody is great at basketball, they don't just walk onto the court and they're magically amazing at basketball. There's years of hard work that preceded that. And so, the same thing could be said of options trading in the market or even just investing in general. If you want to be a great investor, if you want to build wealth and generate income, you can't do this one-time. You can't just walk onto this court and try really hard for a month and then say, "Okay. I'm done." It's got to be something that you commit to and is now part of your identity maybe moving forward, this idea that you want to be an amazing investor, that you want to be somebody who's a trader that generates income and you have to have a long-term commitment into this. That's what it's going to take because yeah, I mean, like the quote says, like you're never going to be good at something you only do once. [Inaudible] in trying to raise kids and you only had one shot one day to be a parent, it doesn't work, like God doesn't work like that, in my opinion. They give you years to learn how to raise kids and you have years to learn how to read and write and go through school because it's that repetition process that's really important, that builds on top of itself, that's a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that you're compounding your knowledge and your understanding.

    I encourage you today to again, review and recommit to this business because this is a great business for many, many reasons. I love the options trading business. I think we even talked about it in one of the shows around 300 or so about like the top reasons why I love this business, but you have to do it on a consistent basis and we're helping you with that as we roll out and get closer to rolling out our auto-trading software and some of the tools that we have that alleviate some of the pain points that I know you guys have because I have them too. And so, hopefully as we get closer to that and we have the ability now to auto-trade option strategies, most of this stuff becomes very frictionless for you. And so, it's the idea about setting it up and consistently watching and monitoring it, but the actual day-to-day is going to be kind of removed from your hands. You won't have to go in and search for trades and manage trades and figure out when to take them off. It'll all be taken care of for you, but right now, you have to still press the buttons and click the mouse and that can be tough for some people. I encourage you again, like I said, just to recommit to it today. Make a commitment to get back into the business. If you've been kind of stalling or have been holding back and treading water and you're not really moving forward, do something today to move forward a little bit faster. As always, hopefully this helps out. If you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    #334 - Can Options Be Assigned Before Expiration? Aug 22, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha. Welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to answer the question, "Can options be assigned before expiration?" There are two things we have to cover in this quick little podcast. The first, of course is the difference between American-style and European-style option contracts. Really quickly, American-style contracts are basically all of the contracts that we generally trade on a regular basis. Those would be your contracts for Apple or Google or Netflix. Many of the ETFs, practically all of the ETFs are American-style. And so, what that means is that those option contracts could potentially be assigned before expiration or you could choose to exercise your contract if you're a long option buyer before expiration. The European-style option contracts which are more of the index style contracts, only assignment can happen or exercise can happen at expiration. That's the difference. Again, most of the option contracts that you'd be trading on a regular basis are American-style which means that they could be assigned before expiration.

    Now, the next question is "Why would somebody do it?" It's really important that we understand that even there is a possibility that option contracts can be assigned before expiration, the likelihood of that happening is very, very small. Statistically, most option contracts are closed out of well before expiration and the ones that do get to the week of expiration, then it's the last couple of days until the last day of expiration in which those contracts are more likely to be assigned or not. It's really a very small percentage of contracts that ever get assigned. Now, the reason that somebody would ever assign a contract (and this is important to know if you are at risk) would only ever be for an option buyer in exchange for getting something else. People, I don't think would ever rationally… So, this is not to say they wouldn't do it irrationally here or there. But rationally, nobody is going to assign their long option contract to you as the short option seller unless they're getting something in return for that. Now, one of the ways that they can do that is through dividends. If there's a dividend coming up, they may want to go through that process and collect the dividend. But we talk about all the time in a video update on dividend risk assignment that it has to be in a way that that dividend then covers them to then repurchase a put option and basically get back into the same risk-adjusted position they were in before. Again, there's a lot that moves around here with dividend assignment and option contract assignment, but you have to think. What are they getting in exchange for actually assigning the contracts?

    The big component that I think about besides even just that little example of dividend assignment, the big component for me is when somebody assigns a contract as a long option buyer and they assign it to an option seller, they are giving up the extrinsic value of those contracts. All option contracts have intrinsic value, the value if they were to be assigned and converted to stock right now and then extrinsic value which is the time and volatility value. Now, as soon as you go through the assignment process, you give up that extrinsic value. That's why most of the assignment happens closer to expiration because there's no or very little extrinsic value left in the contracts. That's why I tell people – Even though your contract is deep in the money or could be deep in the money early in the cycle, that does not necessarily mean it's going to be assigned right away and in fact, it probably won't be assigned right away because there's still a lot of extrinsic value in that contract. There's still value in the sense that there's a month or two months to go until expiration and volatility is still priced into the contract. Hopefully this helps out, again, just to kind of calm your fears if you are fearful of being assigned. Could it happen? Of course, it could always happen. Does it happen that often? Very rarely and again, one thing you want to look at is potentially what's left in the contract as far as extrinsic value. Most brokers have the ability to show this on the option pricing chain. You can see the differential between intrinsic and extrinsic value. If there's very little or no extrinsic value, probably are at a higher risk of assignment earlier in the cycle. As always, hopefully this helps out. If you guys have any questions, let me know. Until next time, happy trading.


    #333 - NFLX Earnings Expectations Were Grossly Optimistic Aug 21, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be talking about Netflix's earnings expectations and why they were grossly optimistic. This I think is just more of a little bit of a case study in I guess understanding the market around earnings events. I have a little bit more experience than maybe some other guys in this industry on this because I used to be an analyst. I had a responsibility to cover REITs and all of these different REIT sectors, multi-family and industrial and corporate office, all of it. I have experience in going through these earnings cycles after knowing a little bit more about the company than maybe the average Joe. I had the ability to sit down and talk with the CEO and the CFO and we had models that predicted where the company was going to go. What I continue to tell people all the time is that even though we might have sat down with the CEO and we knew exactly what the company was valued at, they were pretty clear on their expectations of how much they would earn for the quarter, the one thing we never knew was we never knew what the understanding of the market's expectation of the company would be heading into earnings and then backing out from that, we never knew what the reaction would be from the market when you announced earnings.

    There'd be a lot of times where a company would announce earnings and for all intensive purposes, great quarter, wonderful growth, hit all their targets and the stock is dramatically down and it's because people have these huge expectations of where the company is going to go and what I find more often is that those expectations are now trickling down into Wall Street analyst estimates. What's fascinating about this Netflix little case study here (just for a second) is that you have again, so much money and let's say power behind people trying to understand where Netflix is going, what the company is valued at, its growth rate and they still get it completely wrong. I mean, it's truly just a shot in the dark not only because the information is spotty in some cases or growth is hard to predict which is natural, (we can't always effectively predict the growth of a company) but because in this day and age, people's expectations just continue to rise and rise and rise and they just are not always met. It's just never an occurrence where the expectation that Netflix will grow at 100% every single quarter. It's just not a reality. I don't know why people think that that is a reality.

    We saw this with Netflix just recently and this is back in July where the company was down. I think at one point, the shares were down like 14% during the day or something. I mean, it was a huge drop after earnings. But what's interesting about this is if you dig into like the report on earnings, they had added during that quarter, 674,000 new subscribers. Now, the estimate from all of the Wall Street analysts on average… Some probably got close to that estimate, some were obviously way above, but the average of everybody out there that is covering Netflix was 1.23 million subscribers, so effectively, they missed by half. The average mass of Wall Street intelligence, of all these guys that work at banks and they have all the money and power behind them to do whatever they need to do to understand Netflix and build models and figure out where it's going, on average, they were wrong by half as much. They expected 1.2 million subscribers. They actually got 674,000. Now, that doesn't tell you the discrepancy in just like market dynamic between the company and people who are trying to cover the company and have a really close relationship with everything the company does. If that doesn't prove to you that if those guys can't get it right on a consistent basis, then why do we ever think that we have a chance to do it as a retail trader?

    Now, the point of saying this is not to say that that gives us some sort of disadvantage in the market. I think it's the opposite. I think just accepting and realizing that we have no real edge in trying to predict where a company is going to go during earnings or after earnings is extremely liberating. It's this thing that hopefully should free you to then make more neutral trades, to understand that the probabilities can work out in your favor, that you don't have to predict where something is going to go. I think a lot of people get their personal… I guess, their identity is drawn from the ability to predict where Netflix is going to go or where Apple is going to go or where Facebook or any of these other companies are going to go. Stop doing it. Just leave it alone. We have no idea where these companies are going to go. And even if Netflix hit its subscribe estimate, it still may have been trading down on the day because people are expecting it to always beat the estimate.

    This happened with Apple like five or six years ago where Apple literally crushed all Wall Street analyst expectations. I mean, revenue, growth, everything. It crushed all Wall Street analyst expectations and yet, the stock was down on the day. I remember talking about this on a podcast going, "This is a classic example of – It's not just about beating estimates or not beating estimates. It's about the market's reaction to that. In the case of Apple, people still expected Apple to crush all estimates, but they didn't do it by a wide enough margin, so the stock was down. The point here today is look, we don't know where these companies are going to go, so stop trying to guess and that's okay. We don't need to know where they're going to go. In fact, it's probably better to in this case, act a little bit ignorant to where companies are going to go and always make neutral trades, keep position small, assume that a big move is going to happen here and there and let the probabilities work out. Hopefully this helps out. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    #332 - More Than 70% Of Mutual Fund Managers Don't Invest Their Own Money In The Fund Aug 20, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, were going to be piggy-backing on the show that we had yesterday, talking about the lowest cost ETFs and today, we're going to be talking about why more than 70% of mutual fund managers don't invest their own money in the fund. This is crazy to me. But I started going on down this rabbit hole yesterday because I really in some respects, have very strong distrust and dislike of the mutual fund industry now. I think it's been slow to kind of adapt to the modern world of finance and I think in many respects, it's doing people a disservice because they have their money in there and they haven't really had a need to change. But I think because of outflows in mutual funds, we're going to see that change in the future and that's a good thing for investors.

    But I was going down this rabbit hole and I was wondering to myself – I wonder how many mutual fund managers actually invest their own money in the fund? I mean, that would seem logical. If they're touting the fund and they're heading the fund, they must have their own money invested in it. But there was a research report that was actually done by Russ Kinnel at Morningstar FundInvestor and I think the answer to this is going to be surprising in that when he looked across-the-board at mutual funds, what he found is that nearly 72% of mutual fund managers don't have any money invested in the fund itself that they manage. And even further, if there is a mutual fund money manager that has money invested, more than 85% of them have less than $100,000 invested. Really just a small fraction of potentially their worth or what they are getting paid is actually invested in the fund.

    Why on earth this would happen and why more people don't know about this absolutely floors me. The good news maybe for you guys (I don't know, good or bad news, however you look at it) is that in many respects, what I've done at Option Alpha and have continued to do for 10 years is I eat my own blank, good, bad or indifferent. If I'm trading and I say that I'm going to be trading something, I actually trade it. It's my own account and I post all of this stuff publicly to YouTube after 20 days, 30 days to when we post it and send it out to our members. There's an entire catalog and history of everything that I've done publicly available. I eat my own stuff. If I say that I'm going to trade an option strategy, a covered call or a short strangle or a credit spread, I'm going to do it. I find it highly fascinating and crazy that more people don't know about this and yet, people pour money into the mutual fund industry.

    Whatever food for thought this is today just to get you going and just to help you out and kind of shed some light on this I think is really what the purpose of today's daily call. If you do have people that are invested in this or if you want to share this online just to kind of spread the word about this because I think it's important, I think it would help a lot of investors out, please do so. That would really help us out and get a lot of this information out to the public. As always, hopefully this helps. If you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    #331 - Own The Best ETF Portfolio For Just 0.05% Aug 19, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we are going to be telling you guys' how you can own the best ETF portfolio for just 0.05% and that's an annualized expense fee. This is a really interesting development that we've started to see in the ETF space over the last say three to five years and that is this massive compression in the fees that these ETFs charge or these fees that a lot of equity funds end up charging. And what's really cool about this is that this not only is a product of just the capitalist markets and companies competing against each other, but it also helps out the individual investor like me and you because if we can have a choice to invest in a broad basket of ETFs, say a global basket on most of the ETFs and we can do it for basically $.5 on the dollar, then that is extremely attractive for… or like $.5 on the dollar really, then we can do that. That's extremely attractive for investors long-term. Remember, most of what really eats up investors especially in the mutual fund space which I don't even know how people are still invested in the mutual fund space is fees and taxes. And so, if you can accomplish getting most of that off the table which is fees, then that gets you halfway there and then taxes, in many cases are unavoidable unless you just hold forever like Warren Buffett, but that's one part of the equation.

    Today, I want to go over what is currently the world's lowest cost portfolio, so global portfolio and basket of ETFs. Now, you can find some of this information if you just search the world's lowest cost portfolio. You can also follow Matt Hogan on Facebook. He's a pretty big influential guy in the ETF space and I think is worth following along and kind of seeing what he does because he always posts really great articles and stories about how the ETF market is compressing in fees. But right now, there's basically a basket of securities that you can buy in the ETF space which we'll go over here that if you combine all of the fees for these, you basically get a 0.05% expense ratio. The first one is the US equity basket, the iShares core S&P total US market ETF, ticker symbol ITOT. The next one is the develop markets ETF. This is the Spiders S&P world ex-US ETF, ticker symbol GWL. The next one is emerging markets equity and so, that's also the Spider portfolio emerging markets ETF, ticker symbol SPEM. Then you have fixed income, so an aggregate bond fund. This is the Schwab US aggregate bond, ticker symbol SCHZ. You have a mix of REITs in there, Schwab US REIT ETF, ticker symbol SCHH. And then finally, you have a little bit of commodities that you can roll in there and that's the Graniteshares Bloomberg commodity broad strategy no K-1 ETF, ticker symbols COMB.

    Now, many of these ticker symbols which I think was fascinating when I saw this, you don't actually know or recognize. Like if I told you a lot of these ticker symbols, nobody would recognize them. If I told somebody the ticker symbol for Tesla, everybody recognizes them. But is that the best investment for us long-term, right? If we're trying to build and let's say we have to build a portfolio of ETFs, then this might be a good starting basis because it has lowest total cost and the broadest exposure in just literally a couple of symbols. And so, I think it's really good for people who decide that they either for some reason can't or don't want to trade options or use option strategies around these, they can absolutely invest in this basket and get the lowest cost possible. Hopefully this helps out. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know and until next time, happy trading.


    Previous 1 45 46 47 48 49 81 Next

    Related Podcasts

    How I Built This with Guy Raz

    1

    How I Built This with Guy Raz Business
    Planet Money

    2

    Planet Money Business
    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    3

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast

    4

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast Business
    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast

    5

    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast Business
    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn

    6

    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn Business
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights