TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day — and following the Court’s decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it “information sourcing,” and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. 

    *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2026 Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Oil States v Greene’s (Patent law) (stitcher re-release) May 08, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Patent review, and article 3 separation of powers.

    Support the show


    Jesner v Arab Bank (Alien Torts) (Stitcher re-release) Apr 24, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court holds that the ATS does not allow people to sue corporations.

    Support the show


    SAS v Patent office (inter partes wholeness) Apr 24, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court rules patent office director can not choose which parts of an inter partes review will proceed, only that it will or will not proceed.

    Support the show


    US v Microsoft (Moot) Apr 17, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    The discussion is moot. Because of the passage of the CLOUD act.

    Support the show


    Sessions v Dimaya (void for vagueness) Apr 17, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court compares immigration deportation statue void for vagueness. In that it’s language was too similar to the unconstitutional language found in the ACCA.

    Support the show


    Willson v Sellers (Looking through silent decisions) Apr 17, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court rules that higher courts may should “look through” (in a narrow sense) silent appeals court decisions, to the last reasoned result.

    Support the show


    Encino motorcars v Navarro (FLSA Overtime) Apr 02, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Determination that service advisors fit into the FLSAs overtime exemption.

    Support the show


    Kisela v Hughes (Qualified immunity) Apr 02, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Determination of qualified immunity in favor of an officer in a non fatal shooting.

    Support the show


    Hall v Hall (Separating consolidated cases for appeal) Mar 27, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court Decides once a decision has been made in an individual case which was consolidated with others under 42(a), it can be appealed before other cases associated by consolidation have been decided. (Not interlocutory).

    Support the show


    Ayestas v Davis (Appeals funding) Mar 21, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    in re funding for appeals of indigent defendants, ineffective assistance of counsel, reasonably necessary vs substantial need.

    Support the show


    Previous 1 54 55 56 57 58 59 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights