TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day — and following the Court’s decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it “information sourcing,” and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. 

    *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2026 Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Masterpiece Cake v Colo Civil rights Commission Jun 04, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    1st Amendment free exercise over-rules civil rights of a gay couple in this specific instance - due to the colorado civil rights commission’s obvious hostility to a religious belief.

    Support the show


    Lagos v US (Victims Restitution Act) May 29, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Restitution under MVRA 1996 may not include investigations a victim does itself.

    Support the show


    Collins v Virginia (4A curtilage) May 29, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Supreme court refuses to grant 4th autombile exception to an officer who encroaches upon a home’s curtilage for a search.

    Support the show


    Epic sys v Lewis (Arbitration & NLRB Unfair labor practices). May 21, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Upholding Arbitration agreements

    Support the show


    Skagit tribe v Lundgren (Late argument rejection) May 21, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    The court rejects an argument made for the first time during the appeals process.

    Support the show


    McCoy v Louisiana (6th Amendment) May 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Counsel may not Plead Not-Guilty, at the client's insistence, and then--at trial--admit guilt, over the objection of his client. (Sixth Amendment)

    Support the show


    New Jersey v NCAA (10th Amendment) May 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court strikes down federal anti sports gambling provisions based on the 10th amendment.

    Support the show


    Byrd v US (4th Amendment) May 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Rental car contract violations do not eliminate 4th amendment privacy expectations

    Support the show


    US v Sanchez-Gomez (Moot) May 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Case is moot because nothing could be decided because petitioners cases are over.

    Support the show


    Dahda v US (Wiretap warrants) May 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Just because a judge tried to overstep his jurisdictional limits, does not mean that the evidence gathererd inside of his jurisdiction is inadmissable.

    Support the show


    Previous 1 53 54 55 56 57 59 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights