TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Business

    Selling Intelligence (formerly Selling the Cloud)

    Selling Intelligence is the evolution of Selling the Cloud and designed for revenue leaders who are navigating the AI era.

    Hosted by Mark Petruzzi and Alan Rudolph, the show brings candid conversations with C-suite leaders across sales, marketing, and customer success on how AI is reshaping the way companies grow, sell, and compete.

    From agentic GTM strategies to AI-powered pipeline and revenue execution, each episode focuses on what’s actually working and how leaders are turning intelligence into performance.

    If you’re responsible for growth and trying to lead through the fastest shift in go-to-market we’ve ever seen, this podcast is for you.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © © 2023 Selling the Cloud

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Ep. 87 – Aligning Sales and Product to Drive Revenue with Mike Milburn - Part 2 Aug 06, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode of Selling the Cloud, Mike Milburn—former Chief Customer Officer at Salesforce and founding team member of Service Cloud—joins Mark Petruzzi and KK Anderson for a masterclass in aligning product and sales teams around a shared go-to-market mission.Drawing from his 15+ years at Salesforce, Mike shares hard-won frameworks for building product roadmaps that sales can actually sell, developing trust between CROs and CPOs, and scaling alignment across growth stages. This is a blueprint for leaders who want revenue-generating product strategy—not just internal harmony.What You’ll Learn:The Product–Sales Friction Point: How most teams mismanage this relationship and how to turn it into a revenue advantage.Revenue-Calorie Framework: Why Salesforce prioritized roadmap decisions by “calories” and how to balance innovation vs. renewals.V2MOM as a GTM Operating System: What the V2MOM framework taught Mike about prioritization, transparency, and shared accountability.From Anecdotes to Data: How to structure sales feedback into decision-ready inputs for product teams.Product + Sales = One Team: What world-class collaboration looks like—when sales leaders evangelize the roadmap and product leaders join customer conversations.Key Topics:CRO and CPO relationship-building strategiesTranslating sales objections into roadmap investmentThe role of customer success in roadmap prioritizationQuantifying “deal blockers” to influence productRunning effective board conversations around productHow “True to the Core” made Salesforce a customer-led companyScaling product-sales collaboration from startup to enterpriseGuest Spotlight: Mike MilburnMike Milburn is the former Chief Customer Officer at Salesforce and was part of the founding team of Service Cloud. Today, he serves as an advisor to multiple SaaS companies. His career centers on building GTM systems where product, sales, and customer success function as one growth engine.Resources & Mentions:Framework: V2MOM – Vision, Values, Methods, Obstacles, MetricsSalesforce Event: “True to the Core” session at DreamforceRecommended Book: Behind the Cloud by Marc BenioffOther Concepts: Revenue-calorie model, sales telemetry, deal blocker mapping🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more insights from GTM leaders building high-growth, cross-functional teams. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.Mark Petruzzi (00:03.044)Welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're thrilled today to welcome Mike Milburn, former chief customer officer and many other things at Salesforce for I believe 17 years and current advisor to some incredible technology companies as well, many of which are connected to the Salesforce ecosystem. So 15 years at Salesforce.during a very key time for the evolution of the firm. The transformation from true startup to enterprise giant that we all know and love today. When it comes down to it, what we'd like to cover today is a number of the frameworks that Mike has used to align product and sales team throughout his career and particularly through the Salesforce journey.Four themes we'll explore today. The product sales friction point, why most companies get this wrong, building revenue driven product roadmaps, something Salesforce always did a really good job with, probably mostly led by Mike. Go to market execution, when product and sales team need to move as one, and scaling product sales alignment.All right, let's jump on to topic one, the product sales friction point. Mike, you mentioned that product sales relationship is one of the most critical friction points for CROs, CEOs, and boards as well. What are the fundamental misunderstandings that typically create this tension?Mike Milburn (01:47.64)Thanks, Mark and KK. It's great to be here. I'm really glad that you guys are having this. I can't tell you how many times I've had this conversation in private. so having this conversation in public is just, it's a really neat thing and it's an honor to here. So congrats to that. So I guess I would just kind of like imagine the audience and I would imagine in any company that you're in.And that kind of water cooler, or maybe you're in a car or an airplane and you're having a conversation. And if you're on the sales team, you're talking about, man, I wish I had different products or better products or some sort of anxiety around the product side. And then if you go to the other side of the aisle, imagine that same conversation, the door shuts in the product meeting and you're wondering why you can't sell it. And if you sort of put yourself into that.mode of listening and that mode of parenting those organizations, that's a pretty frequent conversation. So I think that's the place to start, is like an acknowledgement from this virtual audience, how many of you guys have been in that position of hearing friction or anxiety from both the sales side to the product side or the product scene to the sales side.KK Anderson (03:07.463)So that's an excellent point. So when you arrive, let's say you arrive to a new company as a CRO and you discover, let's say that the product is difficult to sell. How do you approach that conversation with the product leadership team and with your board without just saying, hey guys, this product sucks, we can't sell it.Mike Milburn (03:32.034)Yeah. So I think first of all, let's start with the relationships between the CPO and the CRO. And let's start with if you're the CRO identifying the CPO as one of your critical stakeholders to your success. Obviously you're reporting into probably the COO or the CEO of the company, depending on the size and the maturity, but have you properly identified the product leader as one of the key stakeholders kind of colloquial?Locally, I would say are they on your Christmas card list? Have you earned the right to build a relationship that allows you to send a Christmas card to the chief product officer? And so where I start that relationship is really If I'm the CRO, I want to meet the head of product. I want to understand their tenure at the company I want to understand their motivations and I want to understand the successes and failures that I've had with with my predecessorsif you're a new CRO, then there was probably somebody before you. And so what were the things that they did right? And what were the things that they did wrong? Typically where that goes is again, relationships take time to build. So we're sort of jumping into how do you build a trusted relationship with them? You're to have to deliver, but ultimately you want to give the chief product officer the, the trust that you're going to bring them.real-time feedback from the field, you're gonna sell the products that are available, and you're gonna help bring them key insights from customers and partners on what are the things that they should be building. And we're gonna touch on that in a second, but those are really the key things, being able to sell what's available, being able to bring them trusted information about what's going on in the field, and help bring them guidance about where the market is going.Mark Petruzzi (05:30.637)So Mike, tell us about how you built a methodology for navigating this relationship at Salesforce. And how do you make this process kind of board ready and productive and collaborative rather than adversarial?Mike Milburn (05:51.33)Yeah, great question, Mark. So as a, first of all, as a backdrop, you know, I had the immense honor of being one of the guys that started Service Cloud on the founding team for Service Cloud at Salesforce. And of course, Service Cloud is now over $10 billion business inside of Salesforce. And I was there on day one when we booked the first, you know, 30 or 40K order way back in the early 2000s. So that's the framework that I'm going to use. Second is,I think all the credit really goes to Mark and Parker, Mark Benioff and Parker Harris. They created a framework that we inherited, we modified and we enhanced. And that's what I'm going to talk about today. So the way that I think about it, Mark, is what we did in the early days of Salesforce is let's say that you had unit, I don't know, let's say you had 10 calories to burn on product.And let's just for a moment say that all calories are equal, right? We would look at those and we would say, how many those calories are you gonna spend on new or innovation things? And how many products are you, or how many calories are you gonna spend on customer success? And so for argument's sake, let's just take 10 calories. And those calories really translate to resources or funding. But if I had 10 calories,And I devote them all towards the front of the house or all towards sales. And that meant that I was going to create some debt on the renewal side or on the customer success side. And conversely, if I spent all 10 calories and I didn't create any new innovation, I might suffer on sales, but I would really be strong in customer success or renewals. So once you go away from the teeter totter,And you go, well, the natural instinct is to peanut butter and to do five on each, let's say in this, in this hypothetical example. And I think what Parker really did was challenge that idea of peanut buttering and say, let's be really, really thoughtful, deliberate and challenging. And maybe you spent seven calories on sales and only three on customer success or vice versa.Mike Milburn (08:10.134)And let's really think about the trade-offs and let's make those data driven revenue generating success oriented decisions. And so where we took that team was we would take the product roadmap that was based off of that framework. And we would go to the sales leadership and we'd say, can you sell this? And the sales leadership would sign up to sell that. And I think, you know, that, conversation that we started with was.can the product team create a roadmap that the sales team stands behind? And if you imagine that conversation, that's a very delicate conversation. The sales team has to take accountability for, if you're gonna go build something, then the sales team needs to be the one to stand up and say, if you build that, I'm gonna go sell it. There's always problems that come up with pricing or packaging or competition or any one of the various things that happen in the real life world, but.The head of products job is to create a roadmap that is innovative and can support both sales and customer success, which I'm directly calling renewals, usage and adoption. So I think that was the really neat part is once we made a data driven decision, we could then look at our roadmap and say, if I remove one calories from sales, what are the sales impacts?And what are the renewal impacts? And once you have that, the leaders of sales, success and product can all come together and they make the right decisions for the KPIs of the team. And of course that's where the CEO and the ELT come into play. But that becomes a really fun conversation when you have it, you know, when you have it laid out like that, like for this quarter or these two quarters, let's over rotate to sales. And yeah, we might create some customer success issues.If everyone's on the same page and there's no blame game come when the, when the customers incur issues or problems, there's no finger pointing. It's we all made this decision together. And conversely, if you make a decision to go renew all your customers, then that's going to have a lot of benefits and then you might have some, some, sales friction. So it's really creating that alignment and transparency that I was really lucky to be a part of and, mature that process.Mark Petruzzi (10:29.315)So Mike, before we go into our next question, I'm going to open this up a little more strategically. How much did the approach that Mark drove right from the beginning of beat a mom? How much did that get into some of this? Is the methodology that you're talking about building, is it tied to beat a mom or to just kind of work in and integrate on its own along the way?Mike Milburn (10:58.828)Yeah, great question, Mark. So I think of the V2Mom is really a corporate operating plan. And, you know, I've got to be candid and say, think when I first joined and I was baptized in the V2Mom process, I think I wasn't quite on board with how important it was to a company. After a couple of years, I guess I would go back and restate that and say the V2Mom was one of the most important things that Salesforce has as an asset.And it's one of the most important things that I learned. And it's one piece of advice that I've given and driven to any company that I've been lucky enough to work with is the essence of the V2Mom is a corporate operating plan that the exec team creates and they vote on together. And it decides the company's vision, values, methods, obstacles, and metrics. Essentially, what is the operating plan? And if you do it every year, then you're allowed to pivot and change at the speed of business, no matter what size company you are.So think it's incredibly modern. The relationship between the V2Mom and the product roadmap is really simple. If the number one V2Mom is growth, and let's say growth means sales and sales is over customer success, then you should be allowed to spend more of your product calories making products that the sales team wants you to sell. If the V2Mom is customer success is number one, thenyou know, voted on that by the exec team, then you might change the priorities and saying, let's spend more calories together, making products, goods and services that help renewability. So the relationship between the V2 mom, the product roadmap, the sales leadership, the success leadership is the success leadership is it's all part of the exact same formula that drives the corporate operating plan.KK Anderson (12:56.199)And so where like what role do you see the CEO playing out all of this kind of? Facilitating it all you know running them running the balanceMike Milburn (13:06.606)Yeah. So, you we were pretty lucky. We had, you know, we had the legendary Mark Benioff running on that show. And what Mark enabled us to do was he empowered us to create a forum where you're allowed to have a healthy conversation about the VT mom. And I vividly remember, I mean, so many of these meetings all kind of blur together because they were 15, 20 years ago, but I remember somebody in the company standing up and saying, I don't agree with this.KK Anderson (13:11.558)Yeah.Mike Milburn (13:33.13)Maybe the person was an individual contributor, maybe they were an influencer, but when they challenged it, was somebody in the Roman Senate saying, hey, you guys built this, I don't agree with it. And that transparency and accountability was really important. Mark drove that culture. Everyone owned the V2 Mom. Number two was you were allowed to deputize other people for your V2 Mom.So let me make up a little hypothetical situation here. Let's say that Mark is, let's pretend that I'm the CEO, Mark's the head of sales and KK, you're the head of products. And I would say, know, is a number one priority that we sell more and everyone goes, yeah. Well, if Mark's job is the head of sales and your job is the head of product, then you inherit those priorities. And so that's where you can't be parochial or you can't be political. You've got to do the right thing.on the V2Mom for everyone else. And it was more than a faux pas to stand up in a V2Mom meeting and be self-servin…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 86 – Aligning Sales and Product to Drive Revenue with Mike Milburn - Part 1 Jul 30, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode of Selling the Cloud, Mike Milburn—former Chief Customer Officer at Salesforce and founding team member of Service Cloud—joins Mark Petruzzi and KK Anderson for a masterclass in aligning product and sales teams around a shared go-to-market mission.Drawing from his 15+ years at Salesforce, Mike shares hard-won frameworks for building product roadmaps that sales can actually sell, developing trust between CROs and CPOs, and scaling alignment across growth stages. This is a blueprint for leaders who want revenue-generating product strategy—not just internal harmony.What You’ll Learn:The Product–Sales Friction Point: How most teams mismanage this relationship and how to turn it into a revenue advantage.Revenue-Calorie Framework: Why Salesforce prioritized roadmap decisions by “calories” and how to balance innovation vs. renewals.V2MOM as a GTM Operating System: What the V2MOM framework taught Mike about prioritization, transparency, and shared accountability.From Anecdotes to Data: How to structure sales feedback into decision-ready inputs for product teams.Product + Sales = One Team: What world-class collaboration looks like—when sales leaders evangelize the roadmap and product leaders join customer conversations.Key Topics:CRO and CPO relationship-building strategiesTranslating sales objections into roadmap investmentThe role of customer success in roadmap prioritizationQuantifying “deal blockers” to influence productRunning effective board conversations around productHow “True to the Core” made Salesforce a customer-led companyScaling product-sales collaboration from startup to enterpriseGuest Spotlight: Mike MilburnMike Milburn is the former Chief Customer Officer at Salesforce and was part of the founding team of Service Cloud. Today, he serves as an advisor to multiple SaaS companies. His career centers on building GTM systems where product, sales, and customer success function as one growth engine.Resources & Mentions:Framework: V2MOM – Vision, Values, Methods, Obstacles, MetricsSalesforce Event: “True to the Core” session at DreamforceRecommended Book: Behind the Cloud by Marc BenioffOther Concepts: Revenue-calorie model, sales telemetry, deal blocker mapping🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more insights from GTM leaders building high-growth, cross-functional teams. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.Mark Petruzzi (00:03.044)Welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're thrilled today to welcome Mike Milburn, former chief customer officer and many other things at Salesforce for I believe 17 years and current advisor to some incredible technology companies as well, many of which are connected to the Salesforce ecosystem. So 15 years at Salesforce.during a very key time for the evolution of the firm. The transformation from true startup to enterprise giant that we all know and love today. When it comes down to it, what we'd like to cover today is a number of the frameworks that Mike has used to align product and sales team throughout his career and particularly through the Salesforce journey.Four themes we'll explore today. The product sales friction point, why most companies get this wrong, building revenue driven product roadmaps, something Salesforce always did a really good job with, probably mostly led by Mike. Go to market execution, when product and sales team need to move as one, and scaling product sales alignment.All right, let's jump on to topic one, the product sales friction point. Mike, you mentioned that product sales relationship is one of the most critical friction points for CROs, CEOs, and boards as well. What are the fundamental misunderstandings that typically create this tension?Mike Milburn (01:47.64)Thanks, Mark and KK. It's great to be here. I'm really glad that you guys are having this. I can't tell you how many times I've had this conversation in private. so having this conversation in public is just, it's a really neat thing and it's an honor to here. So congrats to that. So I guess I would just kind of like imagine the audience and I would imagine in any company that you're in.And that kind of water cooler, or maybe you're in a car or an airplane and you're having a conversation. And if you're on the sales team, you're talking about, man, I wish I had different products or better products or some sort of anxiety around the product side. And then if you go to the other side of the aisle, imagine that same conversation, the door shuts in the product meeting and you're wondering why you can't sell it. And if you sort of put yourself into that.mode of listening and that mode of parenting those organizations, that's a pretty frequent conversation. So I think that's the place to start, is like an acknowledgement from this virtual audience, how many of you guys have been in that position of hearing friction or anxiety from both the sales side to the product side or the product scene to the sales side.KK Anderson (03:07.463)So that's an excellent point. So when you arrive, let's say you arrive to a new company as a CRO and you discover, let's say that the product is difficult to sell. How do you approach that conversation with the product leadership team and with your board without just saying, hey guys, this product sucks, we can't sell it.Mike Milburn (03:32.034)Yeah. So I think first of all, let's start with the relationships between the CPO and the CRO. And let's start with if you're the CRO identifying the CPO as one of your critical stakeholders to your success. Obviously you're reporting into probably the COO or the CEO of the company, depending on the size and the maturity, but have you properly identified the product leader as one of the key stakeholders kind of colloquial?Locally, I would say are they on your Christmas card list? Have you earned the right to build a relationship that allows you to send a Christmas card to the chief product officer? And so where I start that relationship is really If I'm the CRO, I want to meet the head of product. I want to understand their tenure at the company I want to understand their motivations and I want to understand the successes and failures that I've had with with my predecessorsif you're a new CRO, then there was probably somebody before you. And so what were the things that they did right? And what were the things that they did wrong? Typically where that goes is again, relationships take time to build. So we're sort of jumping into how do you build a trusted relationship with them? You're to have to deliver, but ultimately you want to give the chief product officer the, the trust that you're going to bring them.real-time feedback from the field, you're gonna sell the products that are available, and you're gonna help bring them key insights from customers and partners on what are the things that they should be building. And we're gonna touch on that in a second, but those are really the key things, being able to sell what's available, being able to bring them trusted information about what's going on in the field, and help bring them guidance about where the market is going.Mark Petruzzi (05:30.637)So Mike, tell us about how you built a methodology for navigating this relationship at Salesforce. And how do you make this process kind of board ready and productive and collaborative rather than adversarial?Mike Milburn (05:51.33)Yeah, great question, Mark. So as a, first of all, as a backdrop, you know, I had the immense honor of being one of the guys that started Service Cloud on the founding team for Service Cloud at Salesforce. And of course, Service Cloud is now over $10 billion business inside of Salesforce. And I was there on day one when we booked the first, you know, 30 or 40K order way back in the early 2000s. So that's the framework that I'm going to use. Second is,I think all the credit really goes to Mark and Parker, Mark Benioff and Parker Harris. They created a framework that we inherited, we modified and we enhanced. And that's what I'm going to talk about today. So the way that I think about it, Mark, is what we did in the early days of Salesforce is let's say that you had unit, I don't know, let's say you had 10 calories to burn on product.And let's just for a moment say that all calories are equal, right? We would look at those and we would say, how many those calories are you gonna spend on new or innovation things? And how many products are you, or how many calories are you gonna spend on customer success? And so for argument's sake, let's just take 10 calories. And those calories really translate to resources or funding. But if I had 10 calories,And I devote them all towards the front of the house or all towards sales. And that meant that I was going to create some debt on the renewal side or on the customer success side. And conversely, if I spent all 10 calories and I didn't create any new innovation, I might suffer on sales, but I would really be strong in customer success or renewals. So once you go away from the teeter totter,And you go, well, the natural instinct is to peanut butter and to do five on each, let's say in this, in this hypothetical example. And I think what Parker really did was challenge that idea of peanut buttering and say, let's be really, really thoughtful, deliberate and challenging. And maybe you spent seven calories on sales and only three on customer success or vice versa.Mike Milburn (08:10.134)And let's really think about the trade-offs and let's make those data driven revenue generating success oriented decisions. And so where we took that team was we would take the product roadmap that was based off of that framework. And we would go to the sales leadership and we'd say, can you sell this? And the sales leadership would sign up to sell that. And I think, you know, that, conversation that we started with was.can the product team create a roadmap that the sales team stands behind? And if you imagine that conversation, that's a very delicate conversation. The sales team has to take accountability for, if you're gonna go build something, then the sales team needs to be the one to stand up and say, if you build that, I'm gonna go sell it. There's always problems that come up with pricing or packaging or competition or any one of the various things that happen in the real life world, but.The head of products job is to create a roadmap that is innovative and can support both sales and customer success, which I'm directly calling renewals, usage and adoption. So I think that was the really neat part is once we made a data driven decision, we could then look at our roadmap and say, if I remove one calories from sales, what are the sales impacts?And what are the renewal impacts? And once you have that, the leaders of sales, success and product can all come together and they make the right decisions for the KPIs of the team. And of course that's where the CEO and the ELT come into play. But that becomes a really fun conversation when you have it, you know, when you have it laid out like that, like for this quarter or these two quarters, let's over rotate to sales. And yeah, we might create some customer success issues.If everyone's on the same page and there's no blame game come when the, when the customers incur issues or problems, there's no finger pointing. It's we all made this decision together. And conversely, if you make a decision to go renew all your customers, then that's going to have a lot of benefits and then you might have some, some, sales friction. So it's really creating that alignment and transparency that I was really lucky to be a part of and, mature that process.Mark Petruzzi (10:29.315)So Mike, before we go into our next question, I'm going to open this up a little more strategically. How much did the approach that Mark drove right from the beginning of beat a mom? How much did that get into some of this? Is the methodology that you're talking about building, is it tied to beat a mom or to just kind of work in and integrate on its own along the way?Mike Milburn (10:58.828)Yeah, great question, Mark. So I think of the V2Mom is really a corporate operating plan. And, you know, I've got to be candid and say, think when I first joined and I was baptized in the V2Mom process, I think I wasn't quite on board with how important it was to a company. After a couple of years, I guess I would go back and restate that and say the V2Mom was one of the most important things that Salesforce has as an asset.And it's one of the most important things that I learned. And it's one piece of advice that I've given and driven to any company that I've been lucky enough to work with is the essence of the V2Mom is a corporate operating plan that the exec team creates and they vote on together. And it decides the company's vision, values, methods, obstacles, and metrics. Essentially, what is the operating plan? And if you do it every year, then you're allowed to pivot and change at the speed of business, no matter what size company you are.So think it's incredibly modern. The relationship between the V2Mom and the product roadmap is really simple. If the number one V2Mom is growth, and let's say growth means sales and sales is over customer success, then you should be allowed to spend more of your product calories making products that the sales team wants you to sell. If the V2Mom is customer success is number one, thenyou know, voted on that by the exec team, then you might change the priorities and saying, let's spend more calories together, making products, goods and services that help renewability. So the relationship between the V2 mom, the product roadmap, the sales leadership, the success leadership is the success leadership is it's all part of the exact same formula that drives the corporate operating plan.KK Anderson (12:56.199)And so where like what role do you see the CEO playing out all of this kind of? Facilitating it all you know running them running the balanceMike Milburn (13:06.606)Yeah. So, you we were pretty lucky. We had, you know, we had the legendary Mark Benioff running on that show. And what Mark enabled us to do was he empowered us to create a forum where you're allowed to have a healthy conversation about the VT mom. And I vividly remember, I mean, so many of these meetings all kind of blur together because they were 15, 20 years ago, but I remember somebody in the company standing up and saying, I don't agree with this.KK Anderson (13:11.558)Yeah.Mike Milburn (13:33.13)Maybe the person was an individual contributor, maybe they were an influencer, but when they challenged it, was somebody in the Roman Senate saying, hey, you guys built this, I don't agree with it. And that transparency and accountability was really important. Mark drove that culture. Everyone owned the V2 Mom. Number two was you were allowed to deputize other people for your V2 Mom.So let me make up a little hypothetical situation here. Let's say that Mark is, let's pretend that I'm the CEO, Mark's the head of sales and KK, you're the head of products. And I would say, know, is a number one priority that we sell more and everyone goes, yeah. Well, if Mark's job is the head of sales and your job is the head of product, then you inherit those priorities. And so that's where you can't be parochial or you can't be political. You've got to do the right thing.on the V2Mom for everyone else. And it was more than a faux pas to stand up in a V2Mom meeting and be self-servin…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 85 – Mastering Sales with AI: The First Move (Webinar Recap) Jul 25, 2025
    Show notes

    This special episode kicks off our Mastering Sales with AI series with a candid, high-impact discussion on how revenue leaders can move beyond AI buzzwords and actually apply intelligent selling strategies—especially in volatile markets.Stephen Messer and Paul Melchiorre join Mark Petruzzi to break down the hard truths about what makes AI work in real sales orgs: leadership alignment, data readiness, and daily execution. This is your first step toward modern, adaptive selling—driven by signal, not guesswork.What You’ll Learn:Execution Beats Ambition: Why success with AI doesn’t start with big vision decks—but with specific, high-impact use cases.Your CRM Can’t Keep Up: Why traditional tools break in volatile markets, and how neural net AI models adjust in real time.Forecasting Needs a Reboot: How daily deal signals—red, yellow, green—are replacing “gut feel” and weekly sales meetings.Buyer-Centric Strategy: Why studying sellers won’t help you predict revenue—but studying buyers will.Leading with Insight: How top CROs gain board trust through data, not opinions.Key Topics:Moving from AI theory to operational realityFixing broken forecasting processesLeveraging volatility as a growth advantageRedefining enablement with signal-based coachingWhy AI is a co-pilot, not a replacementHow to scale insights across sellers, teams, and time zonesEvent Recap – Top Takeaways:Start small, win big: Tie AI to real revenue use cases.Clean data wins: No insights without data discipline.AI empowers, not replaces: Give time back to sellers, and sharpen execution.Execution > tools: Adoption follows alignment.🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more episodes in our Mastering Sales with AI series. New sessions coming soon.Mark Petruzzi (00:39)Welcome to this special edition of the Selling the Cloud podcast. Today we're digging in one of the most pressing questions facing revenue teams right now, today. How do you sell and lead when the market gets shaky? We're thrilled to be joined again by our friend and Selling the Cloud regular, Stephen Messer, co-founder of Collective Eye. Stephen is a serial entrepreneur, investor, and one of the most innovative thinkerswhen it comes to applying AI to real world business challenges. With Collective Eye, he's created a platform that brings predictive sales intelligence, once reserved for Fortune 500 companies, into the hand of every seller and sales leader in companies of all sizes. As economic uncertainty rises, many organizations instinctively pull back, but strong sellers and smart leaders lean in. Collective Eye helps them do that with confidence.providing real-time insight into which deals are likely to close, where risk exists, and how to act before it's too late. In today's episode, we're gonna dive deep into three key topics. Why volatility separates strong sellers from the rest, and how leaders can help their team step up. Why traditional forecasting tools break in a shifting market, and how AI gives you the edge.and then how to create urgency when customers are tempted to delay and how to guide them to take action. Okay, let's jump in. Stephen, welcome back to Selling the Cloud.Stephen Messer (02:17)I love being here. Thank you, Mark. Thank you, KK, for having me. You know I love talking to your audience and frankly just talking to you too.Mark Petruzzi (02:24)We love it too.KK (02:24)⁓ that isawesome. We're so happy to have you, Stephen. So let's dive into the first topic, which is how volatility reveals the real sellers. Like, will the real sellers please stand up? And so right now, one of the things that we're seeing across, you know, so many of our clients is hesitation, right? And it's exposing when deals stall and push and delay, it's really exposing sellerswho have relied historically on tailwinds or relied on having a ⁓ well-known logo that they're selling for. And strong sellers, right, they're typically going to thrive in this kind of environment because they're truly meeting the needs and the outcomes of the customer. So what, like in this, just kind of backing up a little bit and thinking about how you sell in volatile times, like what,What do you see or what do you think top performers are doing differently than them?Stephen Messer (03:29)Yeah, well,let's talk about top performers, top organizations, because remember market share is always hard to get in any market. But when there's change, that's usually when markets shift pretty dynamically. And volatility is something that a lot of organizations are sitting today looking around and realizing that they and their architectures are very rigid. They're not very flexible to make change.They're also not getting feedback loops fast enough. And that translates from leadership down to seller. So I say that because, you know, historically we're well, let's put it this way, market volatility, especially when it's external volatility can be very hard to understand. You're asking an individual seller to figure out what's going on or the organization is coming to a group think mentality. And the reason why that's so challenging is because they're using themselves.to try to figure out what's going to change in the world. I think there's nothing harder, right? One, your assumption is it's you. And then the second thing is your assumption is somehow the group think will get us there fast enough. But I think what you've heard me say this before, which is the hardest part about listening to your customer in a high volatility, especially when it's negative market impacts, which is really what we're living through.right now is sort of these shocks to the market that keep coming every other day. And that makes it very hard. What you're hearing from your customer and what their conversations are with you aren't going to help you. They're giving you sort of the Instagram view of the world. And I always joke, the happiest couples look on Instagram in the two months prior to their divorce. They're out there telling you what a great thing is. And I think when market challenges arise,A lot of your customers are afraid to say we're hitting headwinds in our market. That's why we may not be buying and or other things that are going on because they're not sure if it's just them or if it's everyone else and nobody wants to look like they're in trouble because that creates a death spiral and all these other things around it. So what I think I'll highlight is you are talking about the sellers who are able to pick up on those subtle signals or are testing and trying messages almost immediately to test for what's really happening.as opposed to playbook people, or as opposed to people who are just trying to follow the med pic steps. They recognize that as soon as the market changes, I have to start figuring out and sensing what's going on in the market. I think that is one of the more important things to do. But I think I wanted to bring back, because everyone thinks, no, ⁓ it has to do with an individual. So I think it's the whole work fixating on themselves, not trying to understand what the entire market's telling them.and the best people know how to do that.KK (06:24)Really interesting. ⁓ So what if we think about the end-door performers? Like how do, like the ones who aren't pushing and asking the right questions, like how do we, like if I'm a sales leader, is kind of what I'm getting at. If I'm a sales leader and I've got a sales team, I'm gonna have some strong sellers and medium sellers, probably some low sellers. How do I know?How do I know when the times get volatile like this, like who's doing what needs to be done? Like how do I know what's real, what's not, who has happy ears? What do I look for?Stephen Messer (06:51)Yeah.Yeah.Look, Warren Buffett always said it best when the tide goes out is only when you see who's naked. And I think what a lot of the sales organization is going to experience is that a lot of the people that they liked the most in sales were the people who followed their playbooks, were there people who followed the steps exactly. They may, they're probably never the top producers, but they liked it. And what's happening now isthe market has shifted and all those playbooks fail. Always, inevitably. They're doing yesterday's messages, yesterday's sale, yesterday's behavior. And by the way, all their systems are looking at, especially if they're using the older form of AI called machine learning, they're probably looking at the last two years to predict what's going on today. Nothing to do with what today is. So all their systems are falling apart.There's probably a few outliers that are their best sellers and historically been their best sellers, but never listened to anyone, never cared, never paid attention. Those are the players that are best. And I bring that up because those are the players who are just going about doing their job of selling. But the top producers are on their own. All the systems that you're looking at that people have installed.you know, unless they're neural net, they're not adjusting daily to what's going on. So they're all their entire systems are falling apart. Can I, can I give an explanation of what I mean by that? All right. I want you to imagine that if you pick the technology, the older workflow technologies, you know, for forecasting, for deal review, for conversational intelligence, whatever you're looking at, they're all looking at just your company's data.Mark Petruzzi (08:35)Yes, please.Stephen Messer (08:53)for the last two years and using machine learning to look for the average. called, it's a regression model. They're looking at what's the average. So they're trying to figure out whatever worked over the last two years is going to be assigned for what works today. That is a real problem. And I'll give an analogy to try to make it easy. I want you to imagine a plane where all your gauges will work fine so long as the plane is working perfectly.But if an engine catches on fire, something that hasn't happened in the last two years, all your gauges break. Now, I want to be clear. The only time you needed the gauges was when the emergency came up. But they're all designed to break the minute there's something new or unusual that occurs. So if you are using the most common tools that are out there, I'm not going to name their names.Cadence tools, forecasting tools, et cetera. And they're not like Collective Eye where we're using entire networks in a neural net. What's happening is they're not adjusting to the change. Everything just looks like it's broken and you can't figure out what's going on. So you've lost all your tooling to understand daily change. think of this. Most people are still doing weekly forecasting. Or they're figuring out that deals don't work at the end of a quarter.So when you're having volatility, think about what's happened in the last five days, ⁓ Tariffs on, tariffs off, tariffs doubled ⁓ to China. Then it was the Federal Reserve Chief is gonna get fired, then he's getting saved. I mean, I can go through the dailyness. And by the way, this is like the first 120 days. Like, this is like not minor stuff. And everyone's trying to look at their tooling to get a sense of what's happening with their deals.And that tooling is using the last two years that had none of this to decide what's going on. I think that's terrifying. If I'm them, you're flying without gauges in fog. You are literally trying to hope for, does anyone see anything? Does anyone hear anything? I don't know how you do it. And this is a good warning. We're shot over the bow that if you don't have, in our world we call it collective, which is obviously our name.Which is if an AI like a neural net, these newer types of AI aren't learning from everything going on, you are literally trying to ask the people in your org to figure out from a limited amount of data what's actually happening on a macro level. I think that's crazy.Mark Petruzzi (11:31)Yeah. And it's especially crazy, Steven, when we're also in the midst of software and SaaS, software as a service, being entirely different in the world than ⁓ AI. So maybe we can touch a little bit there and maybe tie it back to how the sales leaders leverage the new tools to leverage and figure out who their highest performing reps.Stephen Messer (11:43)displaced. Yeah.Mark Petruzzi (12:01)and highest potential reps are going to be in this new environment and in this new technology space as well.Stephen Messer (12:09)Yeah. Look, ⁓ I think in these times, there's two types of leaders. There's the back to basics leaders. All right. These are the guys where they're like, my God, we're going through this, but I've experienced other problems in the past. So I'm going to follow my old, wait, look, I just really need people to hunker down and do this thing. Now that's kind of like when Walmart started getting hit by Amazon andI could see Walmart executives being like, it has nothing to do with online shopping. What it has to do is we have to get back to better greeters. If we could just do the basics really well, then people come in, people love greeters. You can't do that online. Like you could see this kind of logic. Back to basics, people don't realize that the world is the paradigm has completely shifted. And now again, I wouldn't say this if it wasn't for we're in the midst of this AI revolution where everyone's doing these things. Cause if you had traditional tools and a market collapse, fine.That may be what you do is back to basics. But in the midst of a market change, what happens is people retool everything when they realize there's a better way to handle a downturn like this. This is what happened. If you think about the dot com collapse, everyone shifted over to digital marketing. We came out of the dot com collapse and more companies had web presences, more companies had.Uh, online shopping more companies had shifted their advertising from traditional things like television, radio, and newspapers to online. Like the entire world shifted. switched to Google, like everything moved because there was a better approach. Well, let me tell you, there is another kind of manager that looks and says, okay, everything is changing. How do I now adjust to it and what else, what is going to happen? And if you think about the AI first sales organization, we are not talking about people who are thinking weekly cadences.Right, you've seen this Mark. Daily optimization means you're adjusting to what's happening to your customer, but you're starting with studying your customer. That's what these models do. Like in our model, our customers, we track 5 % of the globe's economy is feeding this model. That's all feeding back everyone a daily view. You know what that's going to happen to your customer before they've told you just cause you're getting feedback loops.Mark Petruzzi (14:17)Yeah.And the old traditional approaches of this, that your competitors, they're just looking at what happened two years ago and what's happening in that company. There is nothing about the buyer and the buyer's journey and what's happening on that side and what the thought process is. And that's where these AI tools that are especially yours being built in a collective fashionYou…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 84 – Breaking the CRM Mindset: Why AI and Agile Selling Are the Future with Stephen Messer – Part 2 Jul 16, 2025
    Show notes

    In Part 2 of this Selling the Cloud conversation, Stephen Messer, Co-Founder of Collective[i], continues to challenge the status quo of sales technology and leadership—this time focusing on how GTM teams can embrace AI, real-time data, and agile principles to navigate today’s complex buying environments.

    Stephen and the hosts explore what’s broken in forecasting, why reactive CRM systems create risk, and how the modern seller’s mindset needs to evolve in a world where speed, adaptability, and intelligence win.

    What You’ll Learn:

    • The Rise of Agile Selling: Why sales leaders need to build systems that adapt in real time—not ones that just report what already happened.
    • AI-Enhanced Forecasting: How predictive intelligence is helping teams eliminate bias and plan more accurately.
    • Why CRM Alone Is a Liability: A deep dive into why legacy sales systems fail in fast-moving markets.
    • How to Spot Buying Signals Earlier: What modern sales orgs are doing to move faster and respond with precision.
    • Changing the Sales Culture: Why the future of sales leadership depends on embracing new data models and tech-forward practices.

    Key Topics:

    • Limitations of CRM forecasting
    • Integrating AI for signal-based selling
    • Buyer journey complexity and data latency
    • Building an agile, responsive GTM motion
    • Real-time revenue intelligence tools
    • Leadership shifts for the AI-enabled seller

    Guest Spotlight: Stephen Messer

    Stephen is Co-Founder and Vice Chairman of Collective[i], a revenue intelligence platform leveraging AI to enable agile sales execution. He’s a serial entrepreneur with a passion for reshaping how sales teams operate in dynamic, data-rich environments.

    Resources & Mentions:

    • Company: Collective[i]
    • Topics: Agile revenue strategy, AI forecasting, CRM alternatives
    • Suggested Reading: The JOLT Effect, The Qualified Sales Leader, The Sales Acceleration Formula

    🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more episodes on modern GTM, enterprise sales, and AI-led transformation. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.


    Ep. 83 – Breaking the CRM Mindset: Why AI and Agile Selling Are the Future with Stephen Messer – Part 1 Jul 09, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode of Selling the Cloud, Stephen Messer, Co-Founder of Collective[i], joins Mark Petruzzi and KK Anderson to challenge outdated sales systems and thinking—starting with the traditional CRM mindset.

    Stephen shares why CRM is no longer enough to keep up with how modern B2B buyers actually buy, and how AI, agile selling, and real-time intelligence are enabling sales organizations to operate with precision, speed, and adaptability. If your team is still relying on lagging indicators to drive revenue, this conversation is a must-listen.

    What You’ll Learn:

    • Why CRMs Fall Short: How today’s buying environments outpace static, backward-looking CRM data.
    • AI’s Role in Sales Agility: How machine learning and predictive intelligence change how reps prepare, forecast, and engage.
    • Modern Buyer Behavior: Why linear sales cycles are dead and what sellers need to do to stay relevant.
    • Real-Time Revenue Intelligence: How agile systems give sellers an edge by tracking live signals, not just past activities.
    • Breaking Old Habits: What it really takes to shift from CRM dependence to a future-forward, AI-enhanced GTM approach.

    Key Topics:

    • CRM limitations in today’s sales environment
    • How AI enhances human selling, not replaces it
    • The evolution of sales ops and forecasting
    • Agile frameworks in B2B sales
    • The speed and complexity of modern buying journeys
    • Building a responsive, data-informed sales organization

    Guest Spotlight: Stephen Messer

    Stephen is Co-Founder and Vice Chairman of Collective[i], a platform that delivers AI-powered insights for enterprise sales organizations. A serial entrepreneur and digital innovator, Stephen brings deep insight into how technology and data can transform sales performance.

    Resources & Mentions:

    • Company: Collective[i]
    • Topics: AI in sales, agile revenue systems, sales enablement tech
    • Recommended Reading: The JOLT Effect, The Challenger Sale, Predictable Revenue


    🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for weekly expert conversations on the future of enterprise selling, GTM strategy, and revenue innovation. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.



    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.


    Ep. 82 – Fixing Flawed ABM Programs and Moving Upmarket with Kristina Jaramillo - Part 2 Jul 02, 2025
    Show notes

    In Part 2 of Selling the Cloud, conversation with Kristina Jaramillo, President of Personal ABM, dives deeper into how ABM becomes a true revenue engine when it’s embedded across the entire go-to-market team.Kristina focuses on post-sale motion; how ABM supports retention and expansion, closes the sales-marketing gap, and helps GTM teams drive value beyond the initial deal. She also shares how executive alignment, buyer enablement, and account-specific orchestration lead to stronger pipeline outcomes.What You’ll Learn:ABM for Retention and Expansion: Why post-sale ABM delivers faster ROI and stronger pipeline impact.Marketing-Sales Orchestration: How marketing enables—not just hands off—the selling conversation through strategic content and insights.Leadership Alignment for Revenue: The importance of CRO-CMO collaboration and how it drives true go-to-market accountability.Multi-Channel Buyer Relevance: How to use platforms like LinkedIn to drive engagement beyond generic outreach.Revenue-Led Metrics: What to actually measure in ABM, from NRR and deal influence to buyer group engagement.Key Topics:ABM’s role in revenue beyond acquisitionMoving from pipeline handoff to full-cycle enablementHow to align GTM leadership across sales and marketingUsing account insights, not just intent dataOrchestrating account experiences across buyer groupsRedefining the marketer’s role in late-stage dealsGuest Spotlight: Kristina JaramilloKristina is President of Personal ABM and host of the ABM Done Right podcast. She works with B2B tech and SaaS companies to move beyond automation-driven tactics and build strategic, account-relevant go-to-market programs that generate real revenue growth.Resources & Mentions:Podcast: ABM Done RightGo-to-market strategist to follow: Sangram VajreRecommended Books:The Challenger SaleThe Challenger CustomerThe JOLT Effect🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more GTM insights from leading voices in enterprise growth. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.KK Anderson (00:01.573)Hello and welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're excited to welcome Christina Jaramillo, president of Personal ABM. Christina is a trailblazer in strategic account marketing. Her firm specializes in helping tech and SaaS companies evolve their go-to-market strategies to land and expand six and seven figure enterprise accounts. Unlikemany ABM programs focused on automation and intent signals, Christina's approach centers on creating highly relevant one-to-one experiences that influence every stage of the buying journey and drive real revenue outcomes. And so today, Christina is going to share with us what it really takes to succeed in the enterprise space, especially for mid-market companies trying to move up market.So today we're gonna explore four themes with Christina. First, we'll talk about redefining your ideal customer profile, your ICP, and enterprise buyer personas. And we'll talk about how do you align that? Your targeting, your messaging, and how do you get that message right with enterprise priorities? Second, we're gonna talk about fixing flawed ABM programs.Why are so many intent-based, persona-based, ABN programs failing? And how can you rebuild them around account-specific insights and business cases? Third, we're gonna talk about what's not working anymore in B2B marketing. Okay, spray and pray email sequences, generic content, we all know it's no longer cutting it. So we're gonna talk about things that we can do instead. And then finally, fourth,We're gonna talk about turning the marketing to sales handoff, turning the marketing to sales handoff into a handshake. We all know that there's usually some kind of an island or a gap between marketing and sales. And the real trick is closing that gap. And Christina is gonna talk to us about how we can support that handshake. This episode is packed with practical insights for revenue leaders looking to break into larger accounts.KK Anderson (02:21.889)improve win rates, and align sales and marketing. Let's dive in. Welcome, Christina, to Selling the Cloud.Kristina Jaramillo (02:29.602)Thank you so much for having me. I'm looking forward to the conversation.KK Anderson (02:32.077)Yes, we are so excited that you are here today. So let's jump into the first topic, which is redefining your ICP and your enterprise buyer personas. And you've said in our conversations that so many companies that are trying to move up market fail to really, truly redefine their ideal customer profile. So start with.maybe describing what's the difference between an ICP when you're targeting a mid-market buyer or an enterprise buyer.Kristina Jaramillo (03:08.344)Yeah. So first off, I'm going to say that most companies don't necessarily have a ICP in the first place. They might have an ideal customer segments or a total relevant market, which is has sales and marketing teams guessing where they should be prioritizing accounts, where they should be focusing on. So your ICP is your ideal customer. So they're the ones that should be the ones that are predictive of accounts landing, expanding with you, because they align with you. They're going to align with you in a couple of ways. It's operationally.executionally and culturally. These are the ones that are strategically ready for your solution as well and ready to implement with success. They're the ones that have a key strategic priority in place that your solution, your platform, whatever you're selling can play a role in. So no matter how much pain you solve, an enterprise is really not going to move forward with a deal if it doesn't fit into their existing strategic priorities.These are the ones that you have a differentiated situational story to tell. So we all know enterprise deals are inherently longer and they're getting longer, you know, currently, and they're more complex. They require more time, more resources and focus. So you don't want to be wasting your time and your team's time on accounts that are most likely not going to move forward or they're going to get stuck in indecision or churn after a deal is closed. So it's really important that we redefine our ICP and keep optimizing that ICP.because the market changes, your business changes, your customers and your focus changes. So your ICP definition is really going to make sure that you are winning or losing deals and how accounts enter or leave the pipeline. So traditionally, I still see a lot of organizations focusing their enterprise ICP on pretty generic broad.So like industry, company size, revenue, technographics, maybe a superficial look alike. So I've seen stats saying that when you do things like that, you're cutting your win rate by at least 60%. I've seen even closer to 70. And while companies, I know it's kind of scary, but while companies are building their pipeline with these enterprise accounts, win weights are dropping. And it's a lot because companies are spending time on enterprises that...Kristina Jaramillo (05:28.95)are not likely to land and if they do, they might turn. And if they land, they might not ever expand. So account-based go-to market, which we specialize in, is about aligning that complete marketing function with sales, with customer success, so that we focus on the ICP as a team versus just that total relevant market, which is what a lot of companies I've seen have focused on. The ICP that you focus on are the accounts that are predictive of landing and expanding with you.So we need to focus on what are those characteristics of those key enterprises? What are characteristics of enterprises that are strategically ready for you? So for example, most companies are not yet structured to succeed with AI. They might want to move forward. They might be very interested. They might be looking, but they're not set up if they bought an AI solution to maybe use it to its full potential. So there's a risk return, even though there could be greater success.So what we really need to think about is where are we relevant, where our competitors are relevant, and then think about the strategic priorities where we should be looking for in a prospect. And then the situations where we have that differentiated situational story to tell. So it requires more work and it's not something that just kind of sits in a pitch deck somewhere or in a slide somewhere, it never gets revamped.KK Anderson (06:53.093)Wow, that's quite a lot. So...you know, as you are shifting and, and I guess it's way more than just segmenting is what I'm hearing you say. Right. It's more around the strategic priorities. And so, so like, what are some of those blind spots that companies have?Kristina Jaramillo (07:07.47)Yes, that's why we need to be real.Kristina Jaramillo (07:17.656)think they either let marketing define it or let sales define it, or they each have their own version of it. And there's, it's not like a cohesive one that you should be able to ask someone in both sides of the team and even customer success. And they should have very similar, if not identical definitions. And I think that's why there's that disconnect in pipeline numbers and revenue numbers and closed deals and things like that. It's so that we know.KK Anderson (07:22.906)out.Kristina Jaramillo (07:46.39)It's not a matter of like aligning all these teams internally, the go-to marketing. It's really about orchestrating and moving together as one. So whatever marketing does influences sales and then sales influences customer success. And it goes all the way again, when you do up in a circle, because customer marketing would get involved if that's something that your organization has. it's, it's everyone agreeing on it. And again, that whole revisiting it, not just letting it kind of be a stagnant thing.KK Anderson (08:12.411)So how do you determine what those strategic priorities are that your target market might have in common, know, over and above just typical thermographics?Kristina Jaramillo (08:25.154)Yeah, so what we typically do is we'll go to the customers that are the best customers. So the ones that are getting the most value, the ones that are using the platform or solution the most, and the ones that have great stories and examples to sell, and then kind of go by that. What do they look like before they came to us? Would they look like six months into implementation, 12 months, 18, whatever, and then try to go backwards. the approach that I'm talking about is a very narrow approach. So it's not.necessarily scalable right away. It's what we've learned from this type of approach to scale our campaigns, scale our outreach, scale our nurture sequences. So we want to make sure that if we're selling six figure deals, that's our high end maybe. We want to look at what is that account that has closed at that and has all these characteristics that I just spoke about. And how can we kind oftarget organizations that may be similar, but also we tell their relevant story. So we're not just telling the industry or persona story, we tell that account story. And then we can kind of scale back or scale that kind of approach and do it for like the one to few and one to many type of ABM approaches there are.KK Anderson (09:37.659)And so Define for me, I heard you say we tell the account story. So just for the person that's listening for our audience, just give a quick background on this whole concept of tier one, tier two, tier three, or one to many, one to few, one to one.Kristina Jaramillo (09:54.014)Okay. So to, yeah, yeah. One to many is more like demand gen in general, what people know demand gen to be. So you're basically trying to fill the pipeline. One to few is maybe they've engaged and they progressed a little further in their journey. So they're a little more relevant as you get further and further down. like from the one to many to one to few to one to one, you're getting more and more relevant. And one to one is I've heard people describe it as it has to be like an earned approach becauseIt requires a lot of attention. It requires a lot of input and resources. So it's basically for a one-to-one, you're learning what that account is, what is important to them as an account and how that trickles down. So what is the C-suite or what is the board saying at that account that's going to trickle down into the department that you're selling to? Like, how's that going to affect operations, customers, P &L, growth, anything that you can kind of tie your solution to?And this type of approach again is for those bigger level accounts that we know are more, we've identified as part of our RCP, but we also know that they are more aligned with us. They have a strategic priority we can speak to and play a role in and just getting more and more relevant to them. So if you're targeting a bank, for instance, cause I have an example about this that I might get to later.You want to tell the bank story, not a financial services story that has X amount of revenue, X amount of employees and customers, and X amount of locations. You want to tell that particular named bank account story. What's going on there? What are their initiatives for the next 12 to 18 months? What are they investing in? So are they more likely to be going into that digital transformation? Have they already done it? Where are they as an account?And again, this approach is very labor intensive, but it reaps the benefits if it's one of those bigger deals. So this might not be, this approach I'm saying is not for every organization, but there are aspects of it that you can use it if you're selling a $25,000 solution or a hundred or multimillion dollar solution, hundred thousand.KK Anderson (12:00.571)Okay, so question. So when we think about enterprise accounts, we've got a lot of personas, a lot of different stakeholders that cross-functionally we may need to be selling to. So if you're doing that one-to-one approach, let's take your bank, for example, is there a number of stakeholders that you would market to? How do you adapt messaging and content based on your outreach strategy?Kristina Jaramillo (12:31.278)Well, when you redefine your ICP, so like if you're moving from a selling to mid market to enterprise, chances are your personas either change and if they don't change, it definitely expand. So I like to have at least three to five people engage and personas are going to change from even organization because we all know that everyone has different titles or different roles they play in every organization. So I would like to have a couple of people engage from influencer to if we can identify a decision maker or even a blocker or a challenger we can identify.KK Anderson (12:48.741)Yeah.Kristina Jaramillo (13:01.08)But we need to figure out what they typically look like and then the content that would be relevant to them. So if you're selling a solution, like a sales and marketing tech into an enterprise selling team, the AE is not going to have the same priorities as the CRO. So we want to make sure we're speaking to all those decision makers and all those influencers and speaking what's important to them, but what's important to them as a team. like the CRO is obviously going to care about things that are more tied to.the business as a whole, team as a whole, whereas the AE might not, or even a director of sales might not. So we got to make sure that we're talking to their particular, like what's going to make them successful and how is your solution…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 81 – Fixing Flawed ABM Programs and Moving Upmarket with Kristina Jaramillo - Part 1 Jun 25, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode of Selling the Cloud, Kristina Jaramillo, President of Personal ABM, joins KK Anderson to unpack why most ABM programs fall short; and what it really takes to win and expand six- to seven-figure enterprise accounts.Kristina shares how B2B teams can go beyond persona-based playbooks to deliver personalized, strategic account experiences. She explains how to redefine your ICP, align marketing and sales with shared revenue accountability, and build campaigns that influence real pipeline movement; especially when targeting enterprise buyers.What You’ll Learn:ABM Foundations that Win: How true account insights—beyond intent data or personas—unlock six- and seven-figure deals.Strategic ICP Redefinition: Mapping accounts by strategic readiness and revenue potential, not just firmographics.Full-Funnel Alignment: Tactics that unite sales, marketing, and CS around shared expansion and retention goals.Personalization at Scale: Frameworks for moving from one-to-one to one-to-few without losing relevance.Revenue-Centric Metrics: Using stage progression, influenced pipeline, and NRR to prove ABM impact.Key Topics:Strategic account-based marketing for mid-market & enterprise growthDifferentiating ABM from demand genIntent data traps and tech misuseMetrics that go beyond MQLs: NRR, stage progression, deal influenceAligning CS, sales, and marketing around buyer relevanceOrchestrating account experiences, not just sourcing leadsGuest Spotlight: Kristina JaramilloKristina is President of Personal ABM and host of the ABM Done Right podcast. With a deep focus on revenue-driven marketing, she helps B2B tech and SaaS companies build customized go-to-market motions that win and expand high-value enterprise accounts.Resources & Mentions:Podcast: ABM Done RightGo-to-market strategist to follow: Sangram VajreRecommended Books:The Challenger SaleThe Challenger CustomerThe JOLT Effect🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more GTM insights from leading voices in enterprise growth. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.KK Anderson (00:01.573)Hello and welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're excited to welcome Christina Jaramillo, president of Personal ABM. Christina is a trailblazer in strategic account marketing. Her firm specializes in helping tech and SaaS companies evolve their go-to-market strategies to land and expand six and seven figure enterprise accounts. Unlikemany ABM programs focused on automation and intent signals, Christina's approach centers on creating highly relevant one-to-one experiences that influence every stage of the buying journey and drive real revenue outcomes. And so today, Christina is going to share with us what it really takes to succeed in the enterprise space, especially for mid-market companies trying to move up market.So today we're gonna explore four themes with Christina. First, we'll talk about redefining your ideal customer profile, your ICP, and enterprise buyer personas. And we'll talk about how do you align that? Your targeting, your messaging, and how do you get that message right with enterprise priorities? Second, we're gonna talk about fixing flawed ABM programs.Why are so many intent-based, persona-based, ABN programs failing? And how can you rebuild them around account-specific insights and business cases? Third, we're gonna talk about what's not working anymore in B2B marketing. Okay, spray and pray email sequences, generic content, we all know it's no longer cutting it. So we're gonna talk about things that we can do instead. And then finally, fourth,We're gonna talk about turning the marketing to sales handoff, turning the marketing to sales handoff into a handshake. We all know that there's usually some kind of an island or a gap between marketing and sales. And the real trick is closing that gap. And Christina is gonna talk to us about how we can support that handshake. This episode is packed with practical insights for revenue leaders looking to break into larger accounts.KK Anderson (02:21.889)improve win rates, and align sales and marketing. Let's dive in. Welcome, Christina, to Selling the Cloud.Kristina Jaramillo (02:29.602)Thank you so much for having me. I'm looking forward to the conversation.KK Anderson (02:32.077)Yes, we are so excited that you are here today. So let's jump into the first topic, which is redefining your ICP and your enterprise buyer personas. And you've said in our conversations that so many companies that are trying to move up market fail to really, truly redefine their ideal customer profile. So start with.maybe describing what's the difference between an ICP when you're targeting a mid-market buyer or an enterprise buyer.Kristina Jaramillo (03:08.344)Yeah. So first off, I'm going to say that most companies don't necessarily have a ICP in the first place. They might have an ideal customer segments or a total relevant market, which is has sales and marketing teams guessing where they should be prioritizing accounts, where they should be focusing on. So your ICP is your ideal customer. So they're the ones that should be the ones that are predictive of accounts landing, expanding with you, because they align with you. They're going to align with you in a couple of ways. It's operationally.executionally and culturally. These are the ones that are strategically ready for your solution as well and ready to implement with success. They're the ones that have a key strategic priority in place that your solution, your platform, whatever you're selling can play a role in. So no matter how much pain you solve, an enterprise is really not going to move forward with a deal if it doesn't fit into their existing strategic priorities.These are the ones that you have a differentiated situational story to tell. So we all know enterprise deals are inherently longer and they're getting longer, you know, currently, and they're more complex. They require more time, more resources and focus. So you don't want to be wasting your time and your team's time on accounts that are most likely not going to move forward or they're going to get stuck in indecision or churn after a deal is closed. So it's really important that we redefine our ICP and keep optimizing that ICP.because the market changes, your business changes, your customers and your focus changes. So your ICP definition is really going to make sure that you are winning or losing deals and how accounts enter or leave the pipeline. So traditionally, I still see a lot of organizations focusing their enterprise ICP on pretty generic broad.So like industry, company size, revenue, technographics, maybe a superficial look alike. So I've seen stats saying that when you do things like that, you're cutting your win rate by at least 60%. I've seen even closer to 70. And while companies, I know it's kind of scary, but while companies are building their pipeline with these enterprise accounts, win weights are dropping. And it's a lot because companies are spending time on enterprises that...Kristina Jaramillo (05:28.95)are not likely to land and if they do, they might turn. And if they land, they might not ever expand. So account-based go-to market, which we specialize in, is about aligning that complete marketing function with sales, with customer success, so that we focus on the ICP as a team versus just that total relevant market, which is what a lot of companies I've seen have focused on. The ICP that you focus on are the accounts that are predictive of landing and expanding with you.So we need to focus on what are those characteristics of those key enterprises? What are characteristics of enterprises that are strategically ready for you? So for example, most companies are not yet structured to succeed with AI. They might want to move forward. They might be very interested. They might be looking, but they're not set up if they bought an AI solution to maybe use it to its full potential. So there's a risk return, even though there could be greater success.So what we really need to think about is where are we relevant, where our competitors are relevant, and then think about the strategic priorities where we should be looking for in a prospect. And then the situations where we have that differentiated situational story to tell. So it requires more work and it's not something that just kind of sits in a pitch deck somewhere or in a slide somewhere, it never gets revamped.KK Anderson (06:53.093)Wow, that's quite a lot. So...you know, as you are shifting and, and I guess it's way more than just segmenting is what I'm hearing you say. Right. It's more around the strategic priorities. And so, so like, what are some of those blind spots that companies have?Kristina Jaramillo (07:07.47)Yes, that's why we need to be real.Kristina Jaramillo (07:17.656)think they either let marketing define it or let sales define it, or they each have their own version of it. And there's, it's not like a cohesive one that you should be able to ask someone in both sides of the team and even customer success. And they should have very similar, if not identical definitions. And I think that's why there's that disconnect in pipeline numbers and revenue numbers and closed deals and things like that. It's so that we know.KK Anderson (07:22.906)out.Kristina Jaramillo (07:46.39)It's not a matter of like aligning all these teams internally, the go-to marketing. It's really about orchestrating and moving together as one. So whatever marketing does influences sales and then sales influences customer success. And it goes all the way again, when you do up in a circle, because customer marketing would get involved if that's something that your organization has. it's, it's everyone agreeing on it. And again, that whole revisiting it, not just letting it kind of be a stagnant thing.KK Anderson (08:12.411)So how do you determine what those strategic priorities are that your target market might have in common, know, over and above just typical thermographics?Kristina Jaramillo (08:25.154)Yeah, so what we typically do is we'll go to the customers that are the best customers. So the ones that are getting the most value, the ones that are using the platform or solution the most, and the ones that have great stories and examples to sell, and then kind of go by that. What do they look like before they came to us? Would they look like six months into implementation, 12 months, 18, whatever, and then try to go backwards. the approach that I'm talking about is a very narrow approach. So it's not.necessarily scalable right away. It's what we've learned from this type of approach to scale our campaigns, scale our outreach, scale our nurture sequences. So we want to make sure that if we're selling six figure deals, that's our high end maybe. We want to look at what is that account that has closed at that and has all these characteristics that I just spoke about. And how can we kind oftarget organizations that may be similar, but also we tell their relevant story. So we're not just telling the industry or persona story, we tell that account story. And then we can kind of scale back or scale that kind of approach and do it for like the one to few and one to many type of ABM approaches there are.KK Anderson (09:37.659)And so Define for me, I heard you say we tell the account story. So just for the person that's listening for our audience, just give a quick background on this whole concept of tier one, tier two, tier three, or one to many, one to few, one to one.Kristina Jaramillo (09:54.014)Okay. So to, yeah, yeah. One to many is more like demand gen in general, what people know demand gen to be. So you're basically trying to fill the pipeline. One to few is maybe they've engaged and they progressed a little further in their journey. So they're a little more relevant as you get further and further down. like from the one to many to one to few to one to one, you're getting more and more relevant. And one to one is I've heard people describe it as it has to be like an earned approach becauseIt requires a lot of attention. It requires a lot of input and resources. So it's basically for a one-to-one, you're learning what that account is, what is important to them as an account and how that trickles down. So what is the C-suite or what is the board saying at that account that's going to trickle down into the department that you're selling to? Like, how's that going to affect operations, customers, P &L, growth, anything that you can kind of tie your solution to?And this type of approach again is for those bigger level accounts that we know are more, we've identified as part of our RCP, but we also know that they are more aligned with us. They have a strategic priority we can speak to and play a role in and just getting more and more relevant to them. So if you're targeting a bank, for instance, cause I have an example about this that I might get to later.You want to tell the bank story, not a financial services story that has X amount of revenue, X amount of employees and customers, and X amount of locations. You want to tell that particular named bank account story. What's going on there? What are their initiatives for the next 12 to 18 months? What are they investing in? So are they more likely to be going into that digital transformation? Have they already done it? Where are they as an account?And again, this approach is very labor intensive, but it reaps the benefits if it's one of those bigger deals. So this might not be, this approach I'm saying is not for every organization, but there are aspects of it that you can use it if you're selling a $25,000 solution or a hundred or multimillion dollar solution, hundred thousand.KK Anderson (12:00.571)Okay, so question. So when we think about enterprise accounts, we've got a lot of personas, a lot of different stakeholders that cross-functionally we may need to be selling to. So if you're doing that one-to-one approach, let's take your bank, for example, is there a number of stakeholders that you would market to? How do you adapt messaging and content based on your outreach strategy?Kristina Jaramillo (12:31.278)Well, when you redefine your ICP, so like if you're moving from a selling to mid market to enterprise, chances are your personas either change and if they don't change, it definitely expand. So I like to have at least three to five people engage and personas are going to change from even organization because we all know that everyone has different titles or different roles they play in every organization. So I would like to have a couple of people engage from influencer to if we can identify a decision maker or even a blocker or a challenger we can identify.KK Anderson (12:48.741)Yeah.Kristina Jaramillo (13:01.08)But we need to figure out what they typically look like and then the content that would be relevant to them. So if you're selling a solution, like a sales and marketing tech into an enterprise selling team, the AE is not going to have the same priorities as the CRO. So we want to make sure we're speaking to all those decision makers and all those influencers and speaking what's important to them, but what's important to them as a team. like the CRO is obviously going to care about things that are more tied to.the business as a whole, team as a whole, whereas the AE might not, or even a director of sales might not. So we got to make sure that we're talking to their particular, like what's going to make…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 80 – Turning Customer Success into a Revenue Engine with Jack Zimnavoda - Part 2 Jun 18, 2025
    Show notes

    In this Part 2 episode, co-host Mark Petruzzi continues the conversation with Jack Zimnavoda, Head of Customer Success at Insightful. This time, they explore how Jack’s team is scaling Customer Success by embedding AI, aligning post-sale marketing, and applying smart segmentation strategies.Jack shares how predictive tools, data-informed health scores, and hybrid touch models enable CS teams to identify churn risks, streamline workflows, and drive expansion; all while maintaining a personal touch.What You’ll LearnPredictive CS in Action: Jack explains how his team uses AI within their CS platform to surface risk, recommend proactive next steps, and highlight expansion-ready accounts.Marketing + CS = Growth: How Insightful brings CS and marketing together to educate customers, promote feature adoption, and scale communication—without losing personalization.Segmentation for Scale: Why Insightful uses a hybrid touch model to support over 5,000 customers across different industries and sizes—without compromising value delivery.Retention Forecasting: Discover how qualitative inputs, usage data, and AI models combine to anticipate churn and improve long-term customer outcomes.Key TopicsBuilding a predictive, AI-supported CS platformAligning CS, product, and marketing post-saleHybrid-touch models for scaleCustomer health scoring and churn predictionOperationalizing expansion strategyCreating scalable CS motions with a human touchGuest Spotlight: Jack ZimnavodaJack is Head of Customer Success at Insightful, where he leads global efforts in retention, adoption, and expansion. With over 10 years of experience in B2B SaaS, Jack has developed practical, scalable strategies that connect Customer Success with revenue growth.Resources & MentionsBook: The Seven Pillars of Customer Success by Wayne McCullochPodcast Mention: This is Growth by Daphne Costa LopesTool: Vitally – CS platform used by Insightful🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more expert insights on scaling GTM teams. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.Mark Petruzzi (00:04)Welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're thrilled to welcome Jack Zimnavoda, Head of Customer Success at Insightful. Jack is a seasoned CS leader with a deep passion for helping companies retain and grow their customer base through intentional customer success strategies. He has built teams that drive renewal, expansion, and adoption at scale, and he's helped shapehow modern B2B SaaS companies think about customer-led growth. Today, Jack will explain how customer success can become a core growth engine through better cross-selling, upselling, and alignment with the rest of the go-to-market organization. Today, we'll explore four areas. One, we're thinking customer success as a revenue driver. Two, building a customer-centric expansion motion.three, partnering with sales, product, and marketing for go-to-market impact, and four, metrics and models that power scalable CS growth. All right, well, again, Jack, welcome. We're very excited about having you here, and we can kind of kick off into topic one. But again, first, welcome.Jack Zimnavoda (01:20)Thanks so much. Really, really excited to be a part of this podcast and ready to dive into it.Mark Petruzzi (01:26)Perfect, all right. Topic one, rethinking customer success as a revenue driver. That is something that I have been in the middle of for many years. And it's funny, you get all different views on this straight up to the CEO and the board. You have a typical customer success mindset of, I don't wanna be selling, I'm not sales. But at the same time, that's evolved as we all know how importantthe upselling and cross-selling process is and how that can't be done successfully without the support of the CS team. So Jack, know, CS has been viewed as a post-sales support function in the past. What needs to change in mindset and structure for it truly to become a revenue driver?Jack Zimnavoda (02:20)Yeah, so it's a totally fair ⁓ mindset that go-to-market leaders have there of customer success being an offshoot of support, particularly for leaders that have been around in go-to-market ⁓ leadership for 20 plus years, because truth be told, customer success was an offshoot of support. ⁓ I started in this career back when it was account management, and then it's gone into its own... ⁓know, evolution since then. But also, I think it's fair to say that that gap in the understanding of customer success being a support function versus what it's really intended to be these days is narrowing, right? I think these days, customer success, especially at SaaS firms, is kind of a core piece of the go-to-market team. And I think most people don't view it the way that they might have 15, 20 years ago.⁓ In those instances where it is still viewed as a higher level of support, think really what needs to happen is a change in mindset first. And that doesn't happen by somebody saying, this works well at other companies, we should do it. ⁓ I think it kind of happens by experimentation, right? Letting the customer success team ⁓ go to their customers and offering ⁓ new things to them, whether it's new use cases orexpansion to different teams or through different product offerings. And the proof is in the pudding in those cases. So I think with that experimentation, when you show small wins like that, it automatically changes the mindset. ⁓ And once that happens, you could think about changing the structure of teams.Yeah.Yeah. These are really, you know, very real problems that customers have, or sorry, companies have when they start introducing customer success as a revenue generator, right? The truth is there's no one way that this works well. I've seen it done in so many different ways. I've seen pods created where CSMs are coupled with salespeople. I've seen, you know, customer success managers own all revenue operations post the initial point of sales and own a quota.And I've even seen, you know, and I don't recommend this, I've seen CSMs essentially treated as SDRs to go out and find opportunities and feed them back to the sales team to manage. You know, I'll just speak to the way that my team is set up because I think it works quite well in the way that we're working it today, which is that my team, ⁓ the way that that insightful works is that the sales team has a certain period of time whereby they're able to expand the accounts that they bring in.⁓ But if that period passes, then the success team has the obligation really to nurture those accounts, find opportunities to take them from identification of the opportunity all the way through through close. And really we incentivize the team to do exactly that. So ultimately, I think any of those types of structures can work. It's just a matter of ensuring that incentives are aligned and that expectations between the teams arevery very clear.Mark Petruzzi (06:51)Great. So Jack, where do you see most companies going wrong when they're trying to turn customer success into a profit center instead of a cost center?Jack Zimnavoda (07:02)Yeah, great question. Two things every time. The first thing is that there's a lack of understanding sometimes when you want the customer success team to take on ⁓ the ownership of the revenue. ⁓ Lack of understanding of what the CSM team has on their plate already from a responsibility standpoint. And then blindly thinking that they could add opportunity, identification, and realization.without negatively impacting those other areas that are already on their plates. So I think when you look at bringing this into a customer success team for the first time, it's really crucial that there's a plan in place to offload some of that non-value added work prior to making the shift so that hopefully the customer success team has a bandwidth to focus on this area plus the core competencies that they've always had.I would say the other thing, and I mentioned this in the previous answer, which is not aligning incentives to the intended outcomes. So, you know, if you're starting this out and you've got your customer success managers judged on things like client sentiment or the number of quarterly business reviews they're doing or gross retention, there's really no incentive for the CSMs to grab onto this opportunity for them with everything they've got.And just bringing this once again back to my team. I handle this by giving them incentives in two ways. The first is by giving them quarterly bonuses that's based on that retention, which of course factors in expansion dollars, but is really rooted in retention. But then on top of that, there is a small commission opportunity, but they're focused on non-organic expansions, meaning these opportunities have to be identified.by the CSM, they really have to be the ones responsible for drumming up this business and owning it from identification through close to get that commission.Honestly, I have not dealt with that struggle too much. And the reason is we set expectations extremely clearly upfront. We explain why the business is going in this direction, which is ultimately to grow revenue business-wide. And also, for me, it's a matter of showing them the previous data. Most of the time, salespeople can get territorial over their accounts, and that's understandable. But when you take a look at their commission payouts,I'd say nine times out of ten, the vast majority of their commission is coming from new business anyway. It's just kind of a mindset that needs to shift of, I should just be focused on new business and that's the key area that the company needs me to focus on and that I'm getting paid for.So I think it should work together pretty seamlessly, right? think sales and customer success need to be working hand in hand. And that is regardless of if customer success is owning the expansions or not. There needs to be a very solid understanding, foundational understanding of what the accounts need, what their use case is, what are their goals that they need to achieve to be able to say, yes, this expenditure was worth it.⁓ As long as you have those kind of key points in play, then the rest I think falls into play pretty naturally. Again, making sure that you're not overloading any particular team with so much that they can't handle their responsibilities.Mark Petruzzi (11:22)Cool. I've got one more on this to double down a little bit. What are the early signs, Jack, that you see that gives you the indication that a CS team is being too reactive instead of being able to make that jump over to the strategic side?Jack Zimnavoda (11:42)Yeah, that's a great question. ⁓ For me, it's really simple. If we're finding examples of churn, customers leaving us, and they come as a surprise to the CSM, it is a clear cut sign to me that they're just too in the weeds of resolving issues that are brought to them and not taking the time to have proactive conversations with their customers about what their goals are, what kind of value they expect to see. ⁓ Any time that thatchurn is brought up and we don't know what's going on there. I need to take a step back and I want my team to take a step back to really understand what happened there in terms of their involvement with that account because it shouldn't be a surprise.Yeah, think there are a couple of things that are constant, whether it's a new logo or an expansion, right? Those things are, you know, solid understanding of what levers there are to pull for increases or expansions, right? Is this a play to sell professional services or is it add-ons that are available to them? Just understanding, you know, what's in their tool belt that they can rely on. And the other thing that I think is a constant betweenwhether it's an existing customer or a new customer, is a really solid understanding at the very minimum of the industries that you're serving and what challenges they're facing. Even better, obviously, if you have a solid understanding of the customers specifically and what their challenges are. But then there are things, I guess you call them ingredients, right, that are a bit more unique to existing customers.The first is incredibly simple but incredibly powerful, think, and that is, are they a happy customer? You can have great products, ⁓ you can have a really solid process for onboarding those customers, but at the end of the day, if a customer is giving you feedback that, for whatever reason, they're unhappy, maybe they're not able to achieve their goals or they felt that the onboarding process didn't work for them,The focus can't be on selling that customer more at that point. It needs to be on fixing that problem. So I think there are a ton of signs that you could get for existing customers that you can't necessarily tell with a new, a net new account in terms of whether or not they're set up for a good expansion conversation. And then the other thing, the other ingredient I would say that's really great to have. I don't think it's a must have, but it's...certainly nice to have, is there's no shortage of tools that a customer success team can rely on to know whether their accounts are primed for expansion. I'm a big proponent of using predictive AI tools that help you analyze the conversations that are happening between the CSM and the account that are able to take a look at the data in your customer success platform or in your CRM.and predict whether or not this account based on a lot of their traits or whatever are a good candidate for expansion. When you're a company like Insightful where you've got 5,000 customers plus, don't have time, or the CSMs don't have time to sort through all the data on their own. So having that kind of predictive insight is really valuable in using their time wisely and focusing on the accounts that areyou know, really ready for that expansion conversation.I'm sure there's more, I'm ⁓ I'm blanking out the others.Mark Petruzzi (16:19)So Jack, tell us about how you work on training CSMs to have these types of commercial conversations without turning them into full-fledged sales reps.Jack Zimnavoda (16:32)Yeah, ⁓ I think part of it doesn't really go into training. It comes into hiring the right people. ⁓ And what I mean by that is, you know, when I'm hiring for CSM roles and I just actually had a couple of interviews this week for a new CSM role in New York, the two kind of mindsets that I'm looking for that I think are great for this position are curiosity and also creativity.⁓ I think when customer success managers can go into conversations with the mindset of genuine curiosity about, you know, customers' businesses, you know, how they're making money, ⁓ what their challenges are, and also creative approach towards problem solving for those challenges, conversations that lead to upsells or cross-sells really just happen naturally. So I think that's the first piece of it, is hiring for the right...sets of soft skills, if you will. ⁓ Having said that, there's also tactics that we could train on. ⁓ One of those tactics for my team is when we're running quarterly business reviews, before that takes place, I'm having my team do a lot of research on the accounts that we're working with outside of just the departments we're working with. We're trying to identify stakeholders that may not even know about Encypheal, could find value in it.And then we're going back to our champions and we're saying, Hey, let's bring them into the quarterly business revie…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 79 – Turning Customer Success into a Revenue Engine with Jack Zimnavoda - Part 1 Jun 11, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode, co-host Mark Petruzzi welcomes Jack Zimnavoda, Head of Customer Success at Insightful. Jack shares how modern B2B SaaS organizations can turn customer success from a support function into a true driver of revenue and retention.Together, they explore what it takes to align CS with sales, marketing, and product—without creating channel conflict. Jack reveals how predictive AI, smart segmentation, and aligned incentives can turn expansion into a scalable and proactive motion.What You’ll LearnCustomer Success as a Revenue Driver: Jack explains how to reframe CS from a cost center to a growth engine—through structure, ownership, and incentives.Avoiding Channel Conflict: Learn how clearly defined swim lanes, compensation clarity, and collaboration between CS and Sales create harmony and momentum.Building a Scalable CS Model: From white-glove enterprise accounts to hybrid-touch models, Jack outlines how to maintain personalized value delivery at scale.Metrics That Matter: Understand the importance of net retention, lifetime value, and how CS teams can build pipelines and forecast revenue just like Sales.AI + Customer Health: Hear how Jack uses predictive AI to monitor product usage, signal risk, and surface expansion opportunities at scale.Key TopicsStructuring CS to own post-sale revenueAligning CS, Sales, Marketing, and ProductChannel conflict: where it happens and how to prevent itUsing AI in CS forecasting and health scoringSegmenting your customer base to drive upsell playsScaling without losing the human touchHow to hire for commercial CSMs (hint: curiosity and creativity)Guest Spotlight: Jack ZimnavodaJack is Head of Customer Success at Insightful, where he leads a global team focused on retention, adoption, and expansion. With over a decade of experience in B2B SaaS, Jack has helped transform CS into a proactive, commercial function that partners across the go-to-market org to drive real business outcomes.Resources & Mentions:Book: The Seven Pillars of Customer Success by Wayne McCullochPodcast Mention: This is Growth by Daphne Costa LopesTool: Vitally – CS platform used by Insightful🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more expert insights on scaling GTM teams. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.Mark Petruzzi (00:04.705)Welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're thrilled to welcome Jack Zimnavoda, Head of Customer Success at Insightful. Jack is a seasoned CS leader with a deep passion for helping companies retain and grow their customer base through intentional customer success strategies. He has built teams that drive renewal, expansion, and adoption at scale, and he's helped shapehow modern B2B SaaS companies think about customer-led growth. Today, Jack will explain how customer success can become a core growth engine through better cross-selling, upselling, and alignment with the rest of the go-to-market organization. Today, we'll explore four areas. One, we're thinking customer success as a revenue driver. Two, building a customer-centric expansion motion.three, partnering with sales, product, and marketing for go-to-market impact, and four, metrics and models that power scalable CS growth. All right, well, again, Jack, welcome. We're very excited about having you here, and we can kind of kick off into topic one. But again, first, welcome.Jack Zimnavoda (01:20.93)Thanks so much. Really, really excited to be a part of this podcast and ready to dive into it.Mark Petruzzi (01:26.807)Perfect, all right. Topic one, rethinking customer success as a revenue driver. That is something that I have been in the middle of for many years. And it's funny, you get all different views on this straight up to the CEO and the board. You have a typical customer success mindset of, I don't wanna be selling, I'm not sales. But at the same time, that's evolved as we all know how importantthe upselling and cross-selling process is and how that can't be done successfully without the support of the CS team. So Jack, know, CS has been viewed as a post-sales support function in the past. What needs to change in mindset and structure for it truly to become a revenue driver?Jack Zimnavoda (02:20.609)Yeah, so it's a totally fair mindset that go-to-market leaders have there of customer success being an offshoot of support, particularly for leaders that have been around in go-to-market leadership for 20 plus years, because truth be told, customer success was an offshoot of support. I started in this career back when it was account management, and then it's gone into its own...know, evolution since then. But also, I think it's fair to say that that gap in the understanding of customer success being a support function versus what it's really intended to be these days is narrowing, right? I think these days, customer success, especially at SaaS firms, is kind of a core piece of the go-to-market team. And I think most people don't view it the way that they might have 15, 20 years ago.In those instances where it is still viewed as a higher level of support, think really what needs to happen is a change in mindset first. And that doesn't happen by somebody saying, this works well at other companies, we should do it. I think it kind of happens by experimentation, right? Letting the customer success team go to their customers and offering new things to them, whether it's new use cases orexpansion to different teams or through different product offerings. And the proof is in the pudding in those cases. So I think with that experimentation, when you show small wins like that, it automatically changes the mindset. And once that happens, you could think about changing the structure of teams.Jack Zimnavoda (04:43.532)Yeah.Jack Zimnavoda (05:17.42)Yeah. These are really, you know, very real problems that customers have, or sorry, companies have when they start introducing customer success as a revenue generator, right? The truth is there's no one way that this works well. I've seen it done in so many different ways. I've seen pods created where CSMs are coupled with salespeople. I've seen, you know, customer success managers own all revenue operations post the initial point of sales and own a quota.And I've even seen, you know, and I don't recommend this, I've seen CSMs essentially treated as SDRs to go out and find opportunities and feed them back to the sales team to manage. You know, I'll just speak to the way that my team is set up because I think it works quite well in the way that we're working it today, which is that my team, the way that that insightful works is that the sales team has a certain period of time whereby they're able to expand the accounts that they bring in.But if that period passes, then the success team has the obligation really to nurture those accounts, find opportunities to take them from identification of the opportunity all the way through through close. And really we incentivize the team to do exactly that. So ultimately, I think any of those types of structures can work. It's just a matter of ensuring that incentives are aligned and that expectations between the teams arevery very clear.Mark Petruzzi (06:51.86)Great. So Jack, where do you see most companies going wrong when they're trying to turn customer success into a profit center instead of a cost center?Jack Zimnavoda (07:02.987)Yeah, great question. Two things every time. The first thing is that there's a lack of understanding sometimes when you want the customer success team to take on the ownership of the revenue. Lack of understanding of what the CSM team has on their plate already from a responsibility standpoint. And then blindly thinking that they could add opportunity, identification, and realization.without negatively impacting those other areas that are already on their plates. So I think when you look at bringing this into a customer success team for the first time, it's really crucial that there's a plan in place to offload some of that non-value added work prior to making the shift so that hopefully the customer success team has a bandwidth to focus on this area plus the core competencies that they've always had.I would say the other thing, and I mentioned this in the previous answer, which is not aligning incentives to the intended outcomes. So, you know, if you're starting this out and you've got your customer success managers judged on things like client sentiment or the number of quarterly business reviews they're doing or gross retention, there's really no incentive for the CSMs to grab onto this opportunity for them with everything they've got.And just bringing this once again back to my team. I handle this by giving them incentives in two ways. The first is by giving them quarterly bonuses that's based on that retention, which of course factors in expansion dollars, but is really rooted in retention. But then on top of that, there is a small commission opportunity, but they're focused on non-organic expansions, meaning these opportunities have to be identified.by the CSM, they really have to be the ones responsible for drumming up this business and owning it from identification through close to get that commission.Jack Zimnavoda (09:19.649)Honestly, I have not dealt with that struggle too much. And the reason is we set expectations extremely clearly upfront. We explain why the business is going in this direction, which is ultimately to grow revenue business-wide. And also, for me, it's a matter of showing them the previous data. Most of the time, salespeople can get territorial over their accounts, and that's understandable. But when you take a look at their commission payouts,I'd say nine times out of ten, the vast majority of their commission is coming from new business anyway. It's just kind of a mindset that needs to shift of, I should just be focused on new business and that's the key area that the company needs me to focus on and that I'm getting paid for.Jack Zimnavoda (10:37.421)So I think it should work together pretty seamlessly, right? think sales and customer success need to be working hand in hand. And that is regardless of if customer success is owning the expansions or not. There needs to be a very solid understanding, foundational understanding of what the accounts need, what their use case is, what are their goals that they need to achieve to be able to say, yes, this expenditure was worth it.As long as you have those kind of key points in play, then the rest I think falls into play pretty naturally. Again, making sure that you're not overloading any particular team with so much that they can't handle their responsibilities.Mark Petruzzi (11:22.775)Cool. I've got one more on this to double down a little bit. What are the early signs, Jack, that you see that gives you the indication that a CS team is being too reactive instead of being able to make that jump over to the strategic side?Jack Zimnavoda (11:42.55)Yeah, that's a great question. For me, it's really simple. If we're finding examples of churn, customers leaving us, and they come as a surprise to the CSM, it is a clear cut sign to me that they're just too in the weeds of resolving issues that are brought to them and not taking the time to have proactive conversations with their customers about what their goals are, what kind of value they expect to see. Any time that thatchurn is brought up and we don't know what's going on there. I need to take a step back and I want my team to take a step back to really understand what happened there in terms of their involvement with that account because it shouldn't be a surprise.Jack Zimnavoda (13:19.477)Yeah, think there are a couple of things that are constant, whether it's a new logo or an expansion, right? Those things are, you know, solid understanding of what levers there are to pull for increases or expansions, right? Is this a play to sell professional services or is it add-ons that are available to them? Just understanding, you know, what's in their tool belt that they can rely on. And the other thing that I think is a constant betweenwhether it's an existing customer or a new customer, is a really solid understanding at the very minimum of the industries that you're serving and what challenges they're facing. Even better, obviously, if you have a solid understanding of the customers specifically and what their challenges are. But then there are things, I guess you call them ingredients, right, that are a bit more unique to existing customers.The first is incredibly simple but incredibly powerful, think, and that is, are they a happy customer? You can have great products, you can have a really solid process for onboarding those customers, but at the end of the day, if a customer is giving you feedback that, for whatever reason, they're unhappy, maybe they're not able to achieve their goals or they felt that the onboarding process didn't work for them,The focus can't be on selling that customer more at that point. It needs to be on fixing that problem. So I think there are a ton of signs that you could get for existing customers that you can't necessarily tell with a new, a net new account in terms of whether or not they're set up for a good expansion conversation. And then the other thing, the other ingredient I would say that's really great to have. I don't think it's a must have, but it's...certainly nice to have, is there's no shortage of tools that a customer success team can rely on to know whether their accounts are primed for expansion. I'm a big proponent of using predictive AI tools that help you analyze the conversations that are happening between the CSM and the account that are able to take a look at the data in your customer success platform or in your CRM.Jack Zimnavoda (15:37.614)and predict whether or not this account based on a lot of their traits or whatever are a good candidate for expansion. When you're a company like Insightful where you've got 5,000 customers plus, don't have time, or the CSMs don't have time to sort through all the data on their own. So having that kind of predictive insight is really valuable in using their time wisely and focusing on the accounts that areyou know, really ready for that expansion conversation.Jack Zimnavoda (16:15.541)I'm sure there's more, I'm I'm blanking out the others.Mark Petruzzi (16:19.671)So Jack, tell us about how you work on training CSMs to have these types of commercial conversations without turning them into full-fledged sales reps.Jack Zimnavoda (16:32.331)Yeah, I think part of it doesn't really go into training. It comes into hiring the right people. And what I mean by that is, you know, when I'm hiring for CSM roles and I just actually had a couple of interviews this week for a new CSM role in New York, the two kind of mindsets that I'm looking for that I think are great for this position are curiosity and also creativity.I think when customer success managers can go into conversations with the mindset of genuine curiosity about, you know, customers' businesses, you know, how they're making money, what their challenges are, and also creative approach towards problem solving for those challenges, conversations that lead to upsells or cross-sells really just happen naturally. So I think that's the first piece of it, is hiring for the right...sets of soft skills, if you will. Having said that, there's also tactics that we could train on. One of those tactics for my team is when we're running quarterly business reviews, before that takes pla…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Ep. 78 - Why CEOs Should Rethink Revenue Leadership: A Strategic Wake-Up Call with Cathy Minter - Part 2 Jun 06, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode, co-hosts Mark Petruzzi and KK Anderson welcome back their friend and former Selling the Cloud host, Cathy Minter, now CEO of Wisdom.io. Cathy brings her deep go-to-market expertise to a timely conversation on what it really takes to scale in today’s fast-changing SaaS environment.

    Together, they explore why the traditional, siloed approach to sales, marketing, and customer success no longer works—and why a unified CRO model is becoming essential for growth-minded organizations.


    What You’ll Learn


    • Why a Unified CRO Model Works
    • Discover the strategic advantages of aligning sales, marketing, and customer success under one revenue leader and when it doesn’t make sense.
    • The Death of Departmental Silos
    • Learn how shifting buyer behavior, faster sales cycles, and AI-driven insights demand end-to-end alignment across the customer journey.
    • Data Fluency as a CRO Superpower
    • Cathy shares why today’s CROs must think like data scientists and psychologists and how that’s changing the role forever.
    • From Chaos to Clarity: Leading Through Change
    • Practical advice for CROs navigating organizational chaos, short tenures, and constant pivots. Hint: Start with what you can change tomorrow.
    • AI as Your New Intern
    • Hear how Cathy leverages AI to supercharge research, prep, and forecasting—freeing up time to do what matters most: build trust and close deals.


    Key Topics


    • The evolution of the modern CRO
    • Aligning KPIs across sales, marketing, and success
    • Why boards have resisted the unified model and how to change their minds
    • The impact of AI on seller productivity and buyer behavior
    • Building trust in a late-stage, digitally empowered buying process
    • Practical tips for early wins in your first 90 days as a CRO


    Guest Spotlight: Cathy Minter

    Cathy is the CEO of Wisdom.io and a proven go-to-market executive with a track record of scaling high-growth SaaS businesses. She has led world-class sales, marketing, and customer success teams and now shares her playbook for building modern, aligned revenue organizations.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.


    Previous 1 5 6 7 8 9 15 Next

    Related Podcasts

    How I Built This with Guy Raz

    1

    How I Built This with Guy Raz Business
    Planet Money

    2

    Planet Money Business
    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    3

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast

    4

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast Business
    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast

    5

    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast Business
    A Thousand Natural Shocks With Gabe S. Dunn

    6

    A Thousand Natural Shocks With Gabe S. Dunn Business
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights