Claire Fallon and Emma Gray obsessively analyze our cultural obsessions, from fashion trends to books to the buzziest TV shows.
patreon.com/claireandemma
php/*
Claire Fallon and Emma Gray obsessively analyze our cultural obsessions, from fashion trends to books to the buzziest TV shows.
patreon.com/claireandemma
Copyright: © CLAIRE AND EMMA LLC
Lindsay Lohan isn’t just a zany rom-com leading lady! She’s a (semi) serious rom-com leading lady.
After “Falling for Christmas” (extremely unhinged) and “Irish Wish” (extremely AI-generated), Lohan apparently wanted to work on a film that was slightly more grounded. Enter “Our Little Secret.”
“Our Little Secret” follows exes Avery (Lohan) and Logan (Ian Harding), as they find themselves in an awkward situation over the holidays, when 10 years after their acrimonious breakup, they discover that their new partners are siblings. Obviously, hijinks ensue! And our gal Lindsay is *made* for hijinks. (A particularly delightful scene sees her attempting to do a reading at her boyfriend’s family church while she is extremely high.)
Like “Hot Frosty,” the supporting cast of “Our Little Secret” is stacked. Kristen Chenoweth is a pitch-perfect as Lohan’s cutting, icy, potential future mother-in-law, and while Dan Bucatinsky, Tim Meadows and Judy Reyes all feel a bit underutilized, it is a pleasure to see them on our screens.
This movie is still, of course, a made-for-streaming rom-com, but it’s also closer to the type of film you might have once expected to see getting a theatrical release. The direction by Stephen Herek, whose past works include “Don’t Tell Mom The Babysitter’s Dead,” “The Mighty Ducks” and “Mr. Holland’s Opus,” is skilled, the performances mostly work, and there are enough laughs to see you through the hour and 40 minutes. Plus, Ian Harding is a guy you might actually have a crush on!
In this episode, we go beat by beat and discuss what we enjoyed about this movie, and what didn’t work quite as well. Plus, we get into the unhinged choices made in that extended 10-years-pass credits sequence. Hope you enjoy! Xo
Special thanks to Harry Huggins for editing this episode.
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
We imagine the pitch for “Hot Frosty” was simple: Olaf from “Frozen,” but he fucks. This Netflix holiday rom-com is here to remind us that Christmas may take place during the cold season, but it can still be *hot*.
“Hot Frosty” follows widow-slash-diner owner Kathy (Lacey Chabert) as she accidentally brings a notably chiseled snowman (Dustin Milligan) to life with a magical red scarf. Is she his mother? His lover? The lines are blurry and the plot holes are plentiful, but “Hot Frosty” commits to the bit. It also boasts ACTUAL JOKES, a pretty stacked supporting cast (Craig Robinson! Joe Lo Truglia! Lauren Holly!), and an undercurrent of anti-carceral sentiment running throughout. In these dark times, honestly we’ll take it.
We had a lot of fun talking about this horny movie, and we hope you enjoy listening! We could all use a little bit of silliness in this moment. Xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
We don’t have any answers, but we do have a lot of feelings. We tried to express them in a cogent way, but full warning that we maybe were only partially successful. Claire would also like all of you to know that she’s angry and doing punditry. Please feel free to ignore her (or both of us!) if that’s not where you’re at right now.
We love you all. We are so very grateful for this little community we’ve built together. Onward.
Thank you to Harry Huggins for editing this episode so we didn’t have to.
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
Warning: This post and episode contain spoilers for the “Love Is Blind” season 7 reunion!
This “Love Is Blind” DC reunion had it all, if “it all” refers to every one of Nick and Vanessa Lachey’s well-documented inadequacies as hosts: corny dad jokes that Nick’s punch-up writer clearly prepared well in advance, missed lines of questioning and failures to follow up on important points, muddled back-and-forth disputes between the cast that dragged out for long minutes while the moderators mentally checked out, Vanessa claiming dubious familial relationships with the “Love Is Blind” babies, and, of course, a couple of the biggest villains of the season being let off the hook with barely a slap on the wrist apiece.
What the reunion episode didn’t have was even more infuriating — most notably, the truth about Tyler’s three kids. The reunion taped before his children’s mother went public with her side of the story, and so he doesn’t address or acknowledge her allegations that he conceived two of his children with her as part of a sexual relationship, not as a sperm donor, and that he was fully present as a dad in the lives of all three of her kids. Instead, he and Ashley come prepared to paint him as a generous but naive guy who was just trying to help a single mom and got a little too involved. Ashley may be the biggest disappointment of the episode, as she insists that she knows all about Tyler’s relationship with his kids and stands by him — indicating that she is supportive of his apparent decision to ghost his three young kids.
Meanwhile, Hannah touts her immense self-awareness and growth since the show while continuing to be glib and unbothered by the hurt she caused others — not just Nick, but her purported bestie Katie as well — and taking the first opportunity to turn things around on Nick and paint him as the true villain of their relationship. And though we can’t and won’t endorse a man going on this show and calling his partner “a grenade,” we can’t and won’t justify her cruel treatment of him throughout the show simply because he has also said unkind things.
There’s a lot more said and unsaid on this reunion, and we dig into as much as we can in this episode. Also inside: how Tim continues to unsettle us, Marissa’s unwise choice to burn her good will by taking on Nick’s golden retriever reputation, women as food with feelings, and all those unnecessary alumni updates. Hope you enjoy! xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
Warning: This post and episode contain spoilers for the “Love Is Blind” season 7 finale!
The first 15 minutes of the “Love Is Blind” season 7 finale was riveting and wrenching. The following hour was largely boring, with sides of sweetness and dramatic irony. This is one of those finales that should have jumped straight into a reunion. (Not that we think the Lacheys are equipped to handle it.)
And yet! We still had a lot to say this 82-minute episode that could have been an email.
We get into Marissa and Ramses’ absolutely devastating breakup (WE HAVE BOTH BEEN MARISSA!!!), Tyler and Ashley’s marriage (well, mostly about everything that has come out since about Tyler), and our one gleaming beacon of hope: Taylor and Garrett. Plus, we do some finale friends and enemies rankings. Hope you enjoy! Xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
The psychologist John Gottman has posited that there are four horsemen that portended doom in a relationship: contempt, criticism, defensiveness and stonewalling. If this theory didn’t already exist, it could have been developed simply by watching this season of “Love Is Blind,” in which contempt and criticism have infected several of the relationships root and branch.
Any amateur shrink could look at the couples who emerged from a less-than-blissful Mexican honeymoon and identify that Alex and Tim, Stephen and Monica, and Hannah and Nick hated each other on a bone-deep level, and they all simply needed to break up. After Stephen and Monica’s dramatic split in last week’s episode drop, the other two toxic couples finally ended things. Tim and Hannah, true to form, executed their respective breakups in the most contemptuous manner possible.
Meanwhile, Tyler has committed to lying through his teeth to his fiancée Ashley about his three children, thus preserving their relationship (for now, at least). Ramses continues to expose his condom-averse fuckboy side, doing far too little to assure Marissa that he will stick by her when she’s not in peak sexual form. Garrett responds to a text from an ex, but maybe just to say that he’s engaged. Are these really the best bachelors the DMV has to offer?
In this episode, we discuss the two unnecessarily nasty dumpings, a conspicuously Leo-free pod mixer, Tyler’s ongoing lies and the many moments of dramatic irony they occasion, Garrett and Taylor’s biggest hurdle to date, and the creeping sense of doom surrounding Marissa and Ramses’s romance. Hope you enjoy! xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
At this point, it feels like it happens every season. You think you know who the villains are… and then more episodes come out and the TikToks start rolling in. Move on over, Leo. Stephen and Tyler (sob!) are ready to take your place.
In this week’s batch of “Love Is Blind” episodes, our couples finish out their time in Cabo and head back to our nation’s capital. Once they’re back in DC, we watch them move in together, see each other’s homes, and meet each other’s families. They also get their devices back. For some couples, like Garrett and Taylor, this means confronting the benign horrors of fish pics. For others, like Monica and Stephen, this means discovering that your partner has been sexting while drunk during a sleep test????
And then there’s Tyler and Ashley. The conversation that they have at the end of episode 9 seems confusing… until you head over to TikTok and watch @storytimewithrikki’s many videos about Tyler’s past, specifically his relationship to his three children. Then things become less confusing and more rage-inducing.
In this episode, we discuss the couples’ final days in Cabo, the meaty conversations between Rams and Marissa, all the Tyler tea (or at least the tea that had come out by the time we taped), and our new beacon of hope — Garrett and Taylor. Hope you enjoy! Xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free subscription
Our nation’s preeminent insta-marriage reality show has taken its talents to the capital for season seven! It’s “Love Is Blind,” DC edition, and this mammoth first drop (six episodes, some close to 75 minutes long) showcases that special DMV flavor. Cast members work at think tanks and ponder whether they would have spoken to each other if they’d met “on the Hill.” One recites a love poem that rhymes “spot [as in, pod] number four” with “my queen from Baltimore.” The armed forces boast heavy representation, including a dater who volunteered in the military defense of Ukraine. There are girlbosses and soft men who are deconstructing their toxic masculinity, and therefore many conversations about the equitable distribution of domestic labor. The season even features our very first art dealer, who has come to reality television to find a woman who wants him for more than his money but makes sure to disclose his financial resources to his prospects.
With almost seven hours of drama to discuss, we left so much on the cutting room floor in this recap. But we dug into as much as we could.
We try to understand each of the men we get to know: Stephen, the gentlest bundle of red flags we’ve ever seen; gregarious law student Marissa’s two eminently crushable love interests, Bodhan and Ramses; Tim, who loves to make decisions driven by spite; pod villain and art dealer Leo. Then there are the women: sweet aspiring trophy wife Brittany; bubbly Hannah, who seeks a hunky man who isn’t shallow; policy advisor Taylor, who speaks in STEM references; Ashley, who longs to have the solid marriage her mother never did.
Finally, this episode gets into the (extremely telling) first reveals and the honeymoon trip to Cabo, where it becomes clear that several of the women are already getting the ick.
Hope you enjoy! xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free
There are a lot of things to love about the new Netflix show “Nobody Wants This.” Unfortunately, its depiction of Jewish women isn’t one of them.
When news first broke that a rom-com show was in the works starring Adam Brody as a hot L.A. rabbi who falls for an agnostic, blonde sex/relationships podcaster played by Kristen Bell, we were ecstatic. We are rom-com devotees who have crushed on Seth Cohen and idolized Veronica Mars. We’re podcasters. And we are, respectively, a Jewish woman and a non-Jewish woman who is married to a Jew. If a TV show was crafted in a lab to appeal to our particular set of passions and lived experiences, it would be “Nobody Wants This.” And yet, after cruising through 10 eminently binge-able episodes, we were left simultaneously delighted by Brody and Bell’s crackling chemistry, and uneasy about the show’s rather vicious portrayal of Jewish women.
It’s clear that Erin Foster, who created “Nobody Wants This” based on her own love story with now-husband Simon Tikhman — he’s not a rabbi, but he is Jewish and Foster converted as a result — has a deep connection to and respect for Judaism. Some of the loveliest moments of the show are when Noah and Joanne connect over the meaning that Jewish traditions and culture can bring, like observing Shabbat or “wrestling with what God is or isn’t.” But much less care was put into crafting the Jewish women who surround Noah: his extractive mother Bina (Tovah Feldshuh), his mean sister-in-law Esther (Jackie Tohn), his manipulative ex-girlfriend Rebecca (Emily Arnook), and the gaggle of more peripheral friends (the WAGs) who only seem to talk about Aruba, breastfeeding and their ugly line of chokers.
The central question at the heart of “Nobody Wants This” is whether it is possible for a gentile who has never even heard the word “shalom” (unlikely for a native Angeleno, but I digress) to seriously be with a rabbi who is “all in” on his faith. It’s fertile ground upon which to set romantic obstacles, and it’s easy to root for Bell’s Joanne and Brody’s Noah to bridge their cultural gaps and make out. But the main obstacles we see during season 1 of “Nobody Wants This” come in the form of Jewish women, who are frothing at the mouth to defeat their ostensible mortal enemy: the “shiksa.”
There’s a long history of the “shiksa goddess” — the blonde, gentile woman that acts as irresistible lust object for Jewish men — in American pop culture; first uttered in the 1927 talkie “The Jazz Singer,” chased after in 1972’s “The Heartbreak Kid,” and crooned about in 2014’s movie-musical adaptation of “The Last Five Years.” The shiksas of “Nobody Wants This” — Bell’s Joanne and her sister Morgan (Justine Lupe) — represent freedom for the men they encounter. They are open and vibrant and funny and successful and flawed in ways that are compelling. They’re so beautiful that their mere presence can stun Jewish men into slack-jawed silence. (Yes, this actually happens. Twice.) It’s easy to see why Noah and his brother Sasha (Timothy Simons) would be drawn to Joanne and Morgan, especially because the women in their own community all seem to be cruel, controlling, irrational, manipulative, overbearing shrews. (A notable exception is the welcoming Rabbi Shira played by Leslie Grossman.)
Bina, Esther, Rebecca and the WAGs are more caricatures than human beings, and in totality perpetuate some of the most noxious stereotypes that exist about Jewish women. In a paper from the Jewish Women’s Archive, scholar Riv-Ellen Prell charts the evolution of the Jewish American Princess and Jewish Mother archetypes, both of which developed out of in-community anxieties which were subsequently filtered through a gendered lens, and which then proliferated in the wider culture.
Of the Jewish Mother, Prell writes:
“Rather than offered out of concern and responsibility, her caretaking served her own needs. She induced guilt. She gave in order to obligate. She loved because she wanted. She suffered in order to be compensated. Rather than sustaining, she destroyed.”
In the same paper, Prell describes the JAP:
“The JAP was portrayed as excessive in wants and desires… The JAP not only wanted, she withheld and denied, rendering her Jewish partner a slave. The culture’s attack on Jewish masculinity, the generalized middle class anxiety about the accessibility of their class to their children, and a consumer culture that narrowed its definitions of attractiveness and desirability conspired to create the JAP. She was so hateful that separating from her—even destroying her—promised liberation by self-erasure.”
Bina is the consummate Jewish Mother. She controls her passive husband, emasculates her sons, and whispers “you’ll never end up with my son” like a threat into Joanne’s ear. Even her dedication to keeping kosher is framed as a tool for familial manipulation rather than a genuine practice. (Joanne witnesses Bina housing prosciutto in the kitchen after excoriating her for bringing pork into the house.) The JAP haunts nearly every other Jewish woman character. Rebecca’s relationship ends because of her “excessive” desires. Esther effectively neuters Sasha. When Joanne is trying to win Esther and her crew of WAGs over, Morgan describes them as “angry women who haven’t had fun in over a decade.”
The Jewish women of “Nobody Wants This” exist only in opposition to Joanne and Morgan, and their paper-thin rendering takes a show that contains so much deliciousness, and turns it all a bit sour. As Esther Zuckerman put it: “You can see why Joanne would want to be married to a Jewish man; you can see why she’s not sure about wanting to become a Jewish woman.”
Journalist Elizabeth Karpen recently asked Foster directly about the genesis of her show’s Jewish women characters on “Nobody Wants This.” Her answer was as illuminating as it is disappointing: “It wasn’t really something I was thinking about too much,” she said.
Unfortunately, it shows. Here’s hoping that the show can course correct for season 2, because everybody wants more Rabbi Noah.
In this week’s subscriber podcast, we get into the joys and failures of “Nobody Wants This,” our eternal crushes on Adam Brody, the show’s shared cultural DNA with “Keeping The Faith,” and more. Hope you enjoy! Xo
“Nobody Wants This’ Review: Kristen Bell and Adam Brody Share Crackling Chemistry in Netflix’s Frustratingly Uneven Rom-Com,” Daniel Fienberg, The Hollywood Reporter
“Nobody Wants This Mean-Spirited Depiction of Jewish Women in Nobody Wants This,”Esther Zuckerman, TIME
“Jewish Gender Stereotypes in the United States,” Riv-Ellen Prell, Jewish Women’s Archive
“Netflix’s ‘Nobody Wants This’ Brings Up the Age-Old Question: Is the Word ‘Shiksa’ Offensive?,” Lior Zaltzman, Kveller
“‘Nobody Wants This’ Creator Erin Foster Wasn’t Thinking ‘Too Much’ About the Show’s Depiction of Jewish Women,” Elizabeth Karpen, Hey Alma
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free
After four years and four seasons of television, Emily Cooper has finally been in Paris for an entire year. That’s right: despite seasonal hopscotch, some misleading pregnancy timelines, and a general sense among the show’s audience, characters, and seemingly even writers that our plucky young marketing phenom has been in Paris forever, it’s really only been about 12 months in “Emily in Paris” time. June has happened roughly 14 times, and Christmas once. Gabriel has had his own restaurant for about three months and can’t believe that he wasn’t awarded a Michelin star within weeks of opening (honestly, what’s the point of it all?). Camille was pregnant for between 8 and 27 weeks. People are beginning to ask questions that the show just can’t answer.
But “Emily in Paris” is not, in any meaningful sense, a show about characters or narratives that take place over the course of specific timelines. It’s about outfits, vibes, meet cutes, breakups, and most importantly, pitch meetings in which Emily saves her colleagues’ butts by coming up with the perfect marketing concept on the fly. It’s also, secondarily, about how sexy men look with their hair pushed back and the travails of growing out bangs.
So we simply couldn’t miss season 4 (the “Emily in Rome?” season), nor the opportunity to discuss all the absurd and silly parts of the show, which are piled together in a disconnected, chaotic heap. Its odd charm only serves to make its manifold flaws more infuriating, and yet, of course, we’re hooked. When Emily learns a full sentence of French, we need to be the first to know. On this episode, we discuss all of the above, especially the show’s tendency to shuffle characters on- and offstage as needed without any consideration for their possible emotional journeys during the intervening time. Hope you enjoy! xo
Share Rich TextIf you liked reading this, click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Patreon!
Give us feedback or suggest a topic for the pod • Subscribe • Request a free