TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Science

    Opinion Science

    A show about the psychology of opinions, where they come from, and how they change. Interviews with experts and deep dives into areas of research uncover the basic psychology of persuasion, communication, and public opinion. Hosted by social psychologist, Andy Luttrell.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2024 Andrew Luttrell

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    #69: Directing Attention (and Other Lessons from the Science of Magic) with Anthony Barnhart (ft. Erik Tait) Dec 19, 2022
    Show notes

    Tony Barnhart is Associate Professor of Psychological Science at Carthage College. But just as notably, he's a magician. As a result of this dual identity, he has the unique distinction of being an expert in the psychology of magic. Magicians have long prided themselves on understanding and exploiting human psychology, but Tony actually brings a scientific perspective. He's on the committee for the Science of Magic Association and played a central role in the book Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions. Today on the podcast, Tony shares his work on the psychology of attention, what we can learn from magicians' expertise in "misdirection," and what science can give back to magic.

    Opening the show is a chat with my buddy Erik Tait. Erik has the unique honor of recently placing third in card magic at F.I.S.M., the Olympics of magic. You can watch his winning act below. Erik shares his story of training for the big competition and what he's learned about the psychology of directing attention.

    Things that come up in this episode:

    • We mention the "Invisible Gorilla" experiment a few times. You can learn more and see a video here.
    • For a nice overview of Tony's research on the psychology of magic, check out his 15-minute keynote address for the 2020 American Psychological Association virtual meeting (video)
    • Tracking people's attention by recording their eye movements while watching magic tricks (Barnhart & Goldinger, 2014)
    • "Microsaccades" (tiny eye movements) reveal whether people are fooled by a magic trick (Barnhart et al., 2019)
    • How auditory rhythms can direct visual attention (Barnhart et al., 2018)
    • Using "tactical blinking" as misdirection (Barnhart et al., 2022)

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    #68: Intellectual Humility with Tenelle Porter Dec 05, 2022
    Show notes

    Tenelle Porter is a new colleague of mine at Ball State University. She's an educational psychologist, and one of the things she studies is intellectual humility, which is people's awareness of the limits of their knowledge and the fallibility of their reasoning. Intellectual humility offers a variety of handy benefits even though there has been some disagreement about what it is, exactly. I was excited to sit down with Tenelle and get her take on intellectual humility, what it does for people, and when we ought to have more or less of it.

    Things that come up in this episode:

    • For a nice summary of a lot of the things we discuss, check out Tenelle's new review article in Nature Reviews Psychology (Porter et al., 2022a)
    • Surveying different definitions of "intellectual humility" to clarify the content of this idea (Porter et al., 2022b)
    • Intellectual humility promotes openness to other opinions (Porter & Schumann, 2018)
    • Intellectual humility promotes mastery in learning (Porter et al., 2020)
    • Classroom environments can shape students' intellectual humility (Porter et al., 2022c)

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    #67: Confronting Prejudice with Margo Monteith Nov 21, 2022
    Show notes

    Margo Monteith is a Distinguished Professor of Psychological Sciences at Purdue University. She studies how we can reduce prejudice in the world by confronting those biases head-on. One way we can confront prejudice is to keep ourselves in check, paying attention to the ways in which we might say or do something biased. Another way we can confront prejudice is to call out other people when they say or do something biased. In our conversation, Margo gives a big overview of her work in these areas and highlights the importance of keeping these biases under control.
    For big, up-to-date overviews of the research we talk about in this episode, you can check out a new chapter in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Monteith et al., 2022) and Margo's 2019 book with Robyn Mallet: Confronting Prejudice and Discrimination.

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    #66: Your Language Shapes Your Opinions with Efrén Pérez Nov 07, 2022
    Show notes

    Efrén Pérez is a professor is a professor of Political Science and Psychology at UCLA. He studies political attitudes and behaviors among various racial and ethnic groups in the United States. With Margit Tavits, he recently co-wrote the book Voicing Politics: How Language Shapes Public Opinion. The book is a fascinating summary of research they have conducted testing how the unique characteristics of the language your speak can shape your political opinions. Languages around the world differ in their emphasis on gender or on the future, which shapes how speakers think in those terms. Languages also carry meaning as to their status in society, which can also affect people's opinions about race and ethnicity.

    In our conversation, Efrén shares how he got interested in language, what they've found in this research, and what questions they're tackling now.

    Some things that come up in our conversation

    • How a language organizes its words for color can shape color perception (Roberson et al., 2005)
    • Language and opinion toward gender and LGBT equality (Perez & Tavits, 2019a; Tavits & Perez, 2019)
    • Language's use of future tense and opinions of distant dilemmas (Perez & Tavits, 2017)
    • Language status and the salience of ethnic divisions (Perez & Tavits, 2019b)
    • The value of "Latinx" (Vicuña & Pérez, in press)

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    Systemic Racism with Phia Salter (Rebroadcast) Oct 24, 2022
    Show notes

    This week, I'm out with COVID, so I'm re-sharing an early Opinion Science episode that has remained one of the most downloaded episodes of the show. I also took the opportunity to very slightly remaster it. See you in a couple weeks with a new episode!
    Phia Salter takes a cultural psychology approach to studying racism. She’s an associate professor of Psychology at Davidson College, and in this episode she draws a contrast between thinking of racism as an individual bias versus thinking of it as systemic. She talks about her research on the “Marley hypothesis” and the ways in which our environments’ discussion of racial issues shapes our own views.
    For more resources on understanding racism in the U.S., you can start by checking out Smithsonian magazine's Resources to Understand Racism in America.

    Things we mention in this episode:

    • Dr. Salter's summary of research related to systemic racism (Salter, Adams, & Perez, 2018)
    • The "Marley Hypothesis": Historical knowledge associated with recognizing contemporary racism (Nelson, Adams, & Salter, 2013)
    • Research on preferences for different Black History Month materials (Salter & Adams, 2016)
    • Writings of Derrick Bell on Critical Race Theory (For an overview of the movement, Dr. Salter recommends Delgado and Stefancic's introductory book)
    • George Lipsitz's "The Possessive Investment in Whiteness"


    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    #65: Language is for Doing with Thomas Holtgraves Oct 10, 2022
    Show notes

    Tom Holtgraves studies how language helps us do things. We use words to inquire, to instruct, to command, and to persuade. Words are social. He's currently a Professor of Psychological Science at Ball State University (just down the hall from me!), and his lab studies how people use language and other symbols (e.g., emoji) to successfully or unsuccessfully communicate with one another.
    He edited the Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology and authored Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. In our conversation, Tom introduces me to Speech Act Theory and what his own work tells us about how we can get our intentions across through language.
    Some things that come up in this episode:

    • J. L. Austin's book "How to Do Things with Words"
    • How we communicate uncertainty (Holtgraves, 2014; Holtgraves & Perdew, 2016)
    • How emoji are used to convey indirect meaning (Holtgraves & Robinson, 2020)
    • Politeness in conversational arguments (Holtgraves, 1997)


    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    #64: Saving Democracy with Robb Willer Sep 26, 2022
    Show notes

    Robb Willer studies social and political divides, and maybe more importantly, he tries to find ways to overcome them. In our conversation, he shares his personal background, unpacks persuasion strategies that cut across political lines, and reveals the results of a major new study in his lab that tested a bunch of strategies for reducing political animosity and encouraging people to value democracy over other political attitudes.
    Some things that come up in the episode:

    • How moral values can be used in persuasion to appeal to audiences across the political spectrum (Feinberg & Willer, 2019; also see this New York Times article)
    • The value of correcting "meta-perceptions" as a way to curb political prejudice (Mernyk, Pink, Druckman, & Willer, 2022)
    • A "mega-study" testing 25 interventions to address political animosity and democratic attitudes (Voelkel et al., working paper)

    Audio for the opening of the show from BBC, CBC, and CNN.

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    SciComm Summer #13: John Sides - Contributing to Political Discussion Aug 29, 2022
    Show notes

    John Sides is a political scientist at Vanderbilt University and co-founded The Monkey Cage, which is a popular political science blog now available at the Washington Post. The blog gives academic social scientists a platform to use their expertise to help the public understand political news. In our conversation, John talks about the origins of TMC, the kinds of articles that are successful, and how (and why!) to write well for a public audience.
    This episode is the final episode in a special podcast series on science communication. You can find more info and episodes here: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/hot-scicomm-summer/
    Video going over key ideas from the scicomm series: https://youtu.be/Fbx2Xj4KcU0
    Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    SciComm Summer #12: Steve Rathje - Social Science on TikTok Aug 22, 2022
    Show notes

    Steve Rathje has managed to rack up more than a million followers on TikTok (@stevepsychology) while pursuing a PhD in social psychology (and doing some very cool research). He shares quick videos about key insights from psychological science that are reaching an entirely new audience. In our conversation, he fills me in on the finer points of TikTok as a platform, why it's uniquely suited to science communication, and how Steve approaches each video to bring insights from social science to a largely untapped audience.
    This episode is part of a special podcast series on science communication. You can find more info and episodes here: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/hot-scicomm-summer/
    Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    SciComm Summer #11: Alie and Micah Caldwell - Building an Independent YouTube Channel Aug 15, 2022
    Show notes

    Alie and Micah Caldwell produce the YouTube channel, Neuro Transmissions. Their videos present the basics of neuroscience and psychology in an accessible, engaging way. Alie is a neuroscientist and senior science writer at the University of Chicago Medicine. Micah is a licensed professional clinical counselor. In our conversation, we talk about the origins of Neuro Transmissions, their philosophy of science communication, and their new book.
    (This episode is a rebroadcast of Opinion Science #40: "Explaining Brains".)
    This episode is part of a special podcast series on science communication. You can find more info and episodes here: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/hot-scicomm-summer/
    Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.

    Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience

    Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/.


    Previous 1 7 8 9 10 11 18 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Invisibilia

    1

    Invisibilia Personal Journals
    Hidden Brain – Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam

    2

    Hidden Brain – Hidden Brain, Shankar Vedantam Science
    How To Do Everything

    3

    How To Do Everything Science
    Hidden Brain

    4

    Hidden Brain Games & Hobbies
    Something You Should Know

    5

    Something You Should Know Education
    Sword and Scale – Sword and Scale

    6

    Sword and Scale – Sword and Scale Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights