TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Keystone Education Radio

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Hanging in the Balance of a Pandemic: Connectivity During Isolation May 27, 2020
    Show notes

    About this Episode Time Stamps Transcripts About our Guest In this episode of Keystone Education Radio, Podcast Host Annette Stevenson is joined by Dr. Will Miller, a recognized and respected authority on coping with stress, interpersonal relationship and organizational health. Drawing on years of experience working as a stress counselor for first responders, Dr. Miller provides insight on how schools and communities can begin to recover from the pandemic’s impact and how personal connection with others is essential to our coping and comeback. Skip to: 01:39 Counties across Pennsylvania have begun to transition to the yellow phase of the reopening plan. And even with that, our lives are going to look different than they did before the pandemic. What are some ways to cope and transition into our new normal? It’s going to be a difficult adjustment because we have to hang in the balance. I think the only way to do that is to really be connected to your people, to be supportive, to stay in contact with each other. Skip to: 04:23 As children return to school, what signs should parents be aware of that their child(ren) may be experiencing anxiety or mental health challenges? Kids are reactive to the mood of the parent. And sometimes the angst of a child is the contagion of the angst of the parent. Do your duty, do your diligence, but really spend as much time on your own calmness and your own anxiety or depression as you do for your children. Skip to: 08:08 First responders experience crises as part of their profession. With the staff and educators as the frontline professionals in a school environment, what are some ongoing tactics that can be used to address high emotions among students and other staff? Some of the most effective strategies have to do with physical triage. That is, it’s going to be really important for the physical fitness program. It’s going to be really important to have opportunities for the kids to be outside. Skip to: 11:39 Social distancing has been one of the prevalent methods used to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. In a lot of cases, this means isolating ourselves from friends and family. How will this impact us when we start to come out of isolation? Skip to: 13:32 What are some pros and cons of social media in the current circumstances and how can parents and educators mitigate the cons or the negatives elements of social media where it pertains to youth? Trolling the internet in place of connecting with people, obviously, has negative consequences. So, social media use has to be monitored. It has to be overseen, not just for the content, but for the hours being spent on it. Skip to: 17:18 There are students who had strong relationships with their school counselors prior to school closures. Some school counselors have been able to maintain communication with their students. What is the importance of maintaining these relationships despite not being able to be in the same building? Worry a little bit more about the kids who are isolating, especially in the high schools, because the isolation is the far more dangerous, because you have to go and prod them out of it. Skip to: 21:19 Where can our listeners learn more about your work? Annette Stevenson: Counties across Pennsylvania have begun to transition, as in many other states, to the yellow phase of their reopening plans. After that, they’ll phase into green, presumably. Even with that yellow phase, our lives are going to look different than they did before the pandemic. What are some ways that folks can cope and transition into what we’re knowing may be like our new normal?Dr. Will Miller: This gets to a pretty fundamental and well-researched theory in psychology, and it’s called locus of control. Julian Rotter from UConn established this a long time ago. It’s pretty intuitive, almost like a range. There are some of us, individually or collectively, who cultivate an external locus of control, meaning that you really don’t have any illusions you have a lot of control over a lot of things. Now think about this writ large, with what we’ve seen globally with people who are living in really terrible circumstances, like what we followed in Syria, for example. If you’re a citizen or a person there, you have no illusion you have much control other than the most basic and elemental things, feeding yourself, taking care of your kids. The American psychological makeup is the opposite. We cultivate a strong internal locus of control. We’re doers, we’re task oriented, et cetera. So my answer to this question is, in this situation, it has flipped, kind of on a dime, where we are at the mercy of forces that are outside of our control. So even though you may be abiding and wanting to keep you and your family safe by the social distancing, et cetera, the mitigation efforts, the fact of the matter is, there’s a real uncertainty about what it means to come back out. I mean, what is the new normal? The new normal it seems to me still has an umbrella of angst and uncertainty about control hanging over all of us. I mean, it won’t be until, and you can see why psychologically it’s so important for all citizens to say, “Boy, if they get a vaccine, a reliable vaccine, that will change the chemistry.” But until then I have to say, it’s going to be a difficult adjustment because we have to hang in the balance. I think the only way to do that is to really be connected to your people, to be supportive, to stay in contact with each other. We are creatures that need to be connected. Even though we can’t hug and shake hands, we can absolutely engage meaningfully with our relationships. So, it’s the same as it ever was in that regard, but it is an adjustment. Annette Stevenson: Yeah, definitely. How we’re connecting has certainly changed quite a lot. So as children are returning to schools, the school buildings, when they do, what signs should parents be aware of that their children might be experiencing anxiety or mental health challenges? What are some of the signs or symptoms that educators and parents should be looking for? Dr. Will Miller: My wife Sally has had a long career in education as an elementary school principal. She really has been down this road before with crises. For example, she and I were living in New York after 9/11, and she was very much involved with schools and dealing with helping kids in the aftermath of that. Here’s the thing, children are resilient, first of all, they are more resilient than the adults are oftentimes. Because, well, let’s face it, to say the obvious the parents have the burden of caring for the kids, where the kids just have to be the kids. So, there’s two things I would say about this. One is every parent knows at an intuitive level the personality of their children. You know who’s a little kind of unfocused. You know who’s kind of the calm kid. You know who the kid, who’s an acting out kid. You have had to manage that all along, and so you can probably predict when you see behaviors erupt or just move along. You know what to do, first of all. As far as the children are concerned, they will bounce back from this. It’s a couple of months of something that was odd, but most parents, I suspect, have been keeping them busy, trying to do school online, having them play, having them be engaged. I can say that, and I trust Sally’s instinct on this too, is that they will be more fine. Now, here’s the key. There’s another theory in psychology about the contagion of emotion, hold onto this. It means that your emotion is liable to feel the contagion of other people. So, the way they test this is, you’re in a low mood, but you’ll walk into a room where everyone is happy and buoyant, it will lift your mood without you even thinking about it. Or conversely, if you’re in a high mood and you’ll, all of a sudden, you come down. So, kids are reactive to the mood of the parent. And sometimes the angst of a child is the contagion of the angst of the parent. To tell you the truth, I’m more concerned about the triage for the moms and the dads and their anxiety, more than for the kids. It will have an impact on the kids, but you know that as well as I do, the intuition of children about the mood and firm footing of their parents, it’s like radar, it’s like a tuning fork. They can sense it, and they act on it. So if the children are acting out, you have to do what you have to do, but just take a moment and think about or reflect on, “Are they feeling the contagion of my, what’s my angst? How am I doing with this?” Like I said in the webinar, even before this crisis, 40 million Americans had a diagnosed anxiety disorder, that’s a fraction of how many have anxiety. That’s just those who got it treated. We know more about anxiety in psychotherapy than almost any other psychological issue. We know what it is, we know what the triggers are, we know what the brain science is, and we know how to treat it. So, my advice on this question is for do your duty, do your diligence, but really spend as much time on your own calmness and your own anxiety or depression as you do for your children. To me, that’s the most important thing I think. Annette Stevenson: That’s a critical distinction. I like that. So, first responders experience crises as part of their profession, whatever that respective profession may be, with the staff and educators as sort of our frontline professionals in a school environment, what are some ongoing tactics that can be used to address high emotions among students and other staff? You’ve sort of started that in the last question, but once folks are back in the building, when students are back in the building, are there tactics beyond what you’ve already covered that can be employed by the students and staff to just maintain that calm? Dr. Will Miller: I have become a certified trauma specialist working with police, law enforcement and firefighters. The science that we know, and a lot of this comes from an amazing guy. I think I might’ve mentioned this in the webinar. The Danish Psychiatrist from Harvard, Bessel van der Kolk. Basically, what the strategies are is, talk therapy is an important thing and teachers and staff do this all the time, “What’s going on so and so? How are we doing?” But some of the most effective strategies have to do with physical triage. That is, it’s going to be really important for the physical fitness program. It’s going to be really important to have opportunities for the kids to be outside. It’s going to be really important for kids to do things like, and I don’t know how things are able to be done in schools, but not just physical fitness like cardio, but one of the reasons they talked with law enforcement people and soldiers about yoga is that yoga is a very, very powerful and well-tested triage. So, if you can either flat out, if your school is open to flat out doing some yoga with kids, or you can just mimic some of the movements and stretches of yoga to just get your organism moving. Movement is important and being outside is really important, being in nature. Then, of course meditation, quiet time. So, these are all things I covered in there, but those are the three, I call them the MBM – the meditation, the breathing, and the movement – are the strategies that just lower your energy level. Teachers are incredibly creative. I mean, they really are. They’re amazing. I know that armed with this research, they can think about, “Is there anything I can do in my classroom or in my program that would incorporate?” It doesn’t have to be meditation sit at your desk, but it could be quiet time. It could be time to just decompress but also to be open with counseling. I know that there are some kids whose issues are significant enough that they may need something pharmacological, they may have medication or something like that when you have attention deficit or whatever, but there are organic strategies for students and teachers that can just quiet the mind, quiet the mind. People with a vivid imagination are more prone to anxiety than those without it, because your mind, this frontal cortex is always buzzing, buzzing, buzzing, and thinking and imagining. We’re meaning making creatures and we imagine, “What is it that we’re imagining?” Basically. Annette Stevenson: Social distancing has certainly been something we’re hearing a lot about. It’s a prevalent method that’s being used to mitigate the spread of this virus. In most cases, this means isolating ourselves from friends and family. So, when we come out of isolation, whatever phasing approach occurs and however rapidly that occurs, what will be the impact? How will this impact us when we’ve been in isolation and we’re starting to come out of it? What do you think that reaction will be? Dr. Will Miller: Well, because it’s not an extended long time. It’s a couple of months, the children, I think, will jump back into it. They’ll talk about it. They’ll laugh about it. They’ll have some experiences. They will remember it forever. My concern for the systems and the adults is to be cautious that we could possibly have to go through something like this again. That’s not something you need to share with the kids, but kids are aware. After 9/11, Sally and I were very involved with the mental health issues that were going on there, she especially with the schools. One of the things that was true, is that developmentally, for any of the teachers with kids under seven, say, is to really protect them from any frightening experiences. I mean, their brain has not been able to develop meaning making to compass that. So, keeping them calm, reassuring them that they’re safe, reassuring them that the adults in the room and their parents and everyone else in the community have their interests first and foremost, and you will be protected and we’ll get through this. Hey, you don’t even have to say this, but we could go through this again in the fall, if there’s another bout of this, but you know how to do this and we know what to do. So, it will be okay. Just the reassurance is really key for kids and the adults. Annette Stevenson: Absolutely. Yes, absolutely. Particularly, as we are physically separated, we are communicating in different ways and there’s various digital channels of communication that are perhaps being even more heavily utilized than they were before. I’m going to mention social media as one of those. So, social media, lots of information gets exchanged through that forum, some accurate, some inaccurate, some opinion-based, some fact-based, but what are some of the pros and cons of social media in these current circumstances? With respect to the student population, how can parents and educators mitigate any of the negative sides of that? Dr. Will Miller: This has been an overwhelming development and it’s near and dear to my heart. I teach this, social media in the graduate program at Purdue, and my colleague at Purdue, Glenn Sparks, and I wrote a book that just got reissued about a year ago, called Refrigerator Rights. I don’t know if you know what they are, but it’s a look at the sociology of media and technology and communication. Basically, what it says is between the American tendency to relocate, think about all of your communities in Pennsylvania, the percentage in every community that represents those who’ve been there for five generations versus those who’ve moved in and out. Kids grow up and they leave. We are mobile to say the least. So, when we leave and we land in our new place, we have a very difficult time reforming relationships that replicate a family. The way we define those is, let’s say, if Sally and I came to you in your home, and we never met each other, and we were just sitting there in the kitchen and a couple of minutes, without knowing you or me, I went to your refrigerator and looked around it there, it brings a picture to mind. Who is in your life, the people who you see all the time, are comfortable enough and intim…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    The Cost of Public Education During COVID-19 and Beyond May 15, 2020
    Show notes
    • About this Episode
    • Time Stamps
    • Transcript
    • Resources
    The PA State budget, school district budgets and the highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression—how does all of this fit into the funding our school districts require to continue educating students and serving their communities?
    PSBA Chief Advocacy Officer, John Callahan and Director of Research, Andrew Christ join host Annette Stevenson to discuss the misnomer about reduced expenses during school closures, mandated expenses on-the-increase, the detrimental impacts of proposed property tax freezes and highlights of the pre-coronavirus data featured in the 2020 State of Education report.

    Skip to: #01:06 Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, PSBA released the 2020 State of Education report. This annual report measures the performance of and challenges facing public schools. How would you summarize the key findings from the 2020 State of Education report? As a pre-pandemic snapshot – provide a few highlights.

    For the fourth year in a row, we’ve seen that mandated costs, like pensions, charter school tuition and special education, have caused the budget pressure to be the single biggest challenge facing school districts.

    Skip to: #02:53 How would a property tax freeze, which has been talked about among legislators, impact districts that are already struggling financially?

    This year is interesting because charter school tuition payments are now the biggest source of budget pressure for school districts.

    The property tax freeze, it could be really detrimental to some school districts because that’s how they pay for these increased mandated costs.

    While everybody’s concerned about the taxpayers, at the same time we have to kind of figure out how to educate and get through the crisis as well.

    Skip to: #08:06 When schools went online due to the pandemic, many of these districts struggled to get a device for each student. This brought to light a disparity among access to technology. What other disparities were highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and do you think these disparities being brought to light will change funding going forward?

    Poverty costs school districts in so many different ways. The computer, the access to technology, the access to the internet or the need for different social work services. Poverty really impacts our school districts on the expense side of things.

    Skip to: #11:42 There has been some speculation that schools are saving money because students are not in buildings. Schools are still required to meet normally sustained financial obligations such as IDEA compliance and providing meals to students. How can the state and federal government assist schools as they cope with this challenge?

    Skip to: #14:48 The proposed state budget was presented back in January. What is different now, going into the final stretch toward June and the final budget discussions?

    It’s the perfect time for school advocates to get out there and talk to the legislators, tell them their local story. Then also make that push. We need funding from the state level. We need your support in this time of crisis. It’s not time to pull back on education because we got to get through it.

    Skip to: #17:55 PSBA is now accepting proposals for consideration for the association’s 2021 Legislative Platform. Do you anticipate the pandemic impacting the association’s legislative priorities?

    Coming soon! 2020 State of Education Report

    The post The Cost of Public Education During COVID-19 and Beyond appeared first on Keystone Education Radio.


    The Impacts of Screen-Time: Teaching Teens to Cope Apr 28, 2020
    Show notes

    About this Episode Time Stamps Transcript About our Guest Resources As schools across the country shuttered this spring due to the COVID-19 pandemic, technology became even more prevalent in the social and educational lives of students. Along with the many benefits of technology come other negative aspects. In this episode of Keystone Education Radio, Podcast Host Annette Stevenson is joined by Dr. Delaney Ruston, a physician and documentary filmmaker who has studied and documented stress, anxiety and depression among teens in the digital age. Dr. Ruston explores the connection between mental health and technology; the role that parents, teachers and students play in addressing mental health concerns; and the impact of COVID-19 on students. This episode is brought to you in part by the Keystone Purchasing Network and the PA School District Liquid Asset Fund (PSDLAF). Skip to: 01:52 In the film Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, you talk to students of different ages and with different life circumstances, but each student seems to struggle with some level of anxiety or depression. From your research, why have mental health concerns become more prevalent as the use of technology increases? People are often surprised that it turns out that in the early ’90s, the rate of young people of their depression symptoms was similar to what it is now. What’s concerning too is that the data shows that teens who are already vulnerable emotionally, they’re more likely to report that screen time, social media in particular, makes them feel worse. The number one thing when I ask teens over the 10 years of doing this work, what is the one thing you want your parents to know? And they’ll say, “I want them to trust me. Skip to: 07:17 In one of the schools you visited in the film, high school students talk to middle school students about how to navigate the experiences they are likely to face as they grow up. A middle school student expresses that they feel more comfortable talking to an older student rather than an adult. When students do talk to adults, how can they make students feel comfortable and allow them to open up?Skip to: 16:19 Students and parents are spending more time together as families are isolated to their homes to prevent the spread of COVID-19. What symptoms can parents look for that could signal their children are experiencing mental health concerns? The number one advice I give to any parent is really doing the work to create a support team. When we can find purpose to our pain and help other people, that dual thing that comes from being able to talk about our mental struggles is one of the huge reasons I’m just thrilled to be a part of ongoing advocacy for so many people paving the way for years on these topics, of how do we completely normalize that it is normal to have a really hard emotional times for people of all ages. Annette Stevenson: Thank you for joining us, Delaney, to discuss this timely topic as many of us are spending more time on our screens due to stay-at-home orders and social distancing practices. Thanks for joining us.Dr. Delaney Ruston: It’s great to be here. Thank you. Annette Stevenson: In the film, Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, you talk to students of different ages and with different life circumstances, but each student seems to struggle with some level of anxiety or depression. From your research, why have mental health concerns become more prevalent as the use of technology has increased? Dr. Delaney Ruston: The work that I’ve been doing with Screenagers and Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER is a lot about understanding how do we talk with kids and teens in a way that they’re going to listen, because we’re in this tech revolution of this candy of technology, they can easily want to be doing their own thing. I really want to make sure we’re giving them information that they can respond to. What I’m worried about, and this is kind of getting to your question, is there’s been this idea that phones are ruining a generation and they are just the cause of any increase that we’re seeing. What I find is that young people immediately get defensive around screen time issues. So, let me get a little bit granular about what do we know about the data around mental health issues. These are the type of things that I share with teens to get them thinking deeply about these issues. People are often surprised, it turns out, that in the early ’90s, the rate of young people of their depression symptoms was similar to what it is now. In fact, for boys it was actually a little bit higher. Not quite as high for girls. There’re many different factors that go into what is going on. In the ’90s it started to go down. Then, in the early 2000s we started to see for all age groups levels, for example, of depression rates to start to go up. In Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, when my daughter developed depression and I just was at a loss what to do, even as a physician. I looked at the data of what you’re mentioning that from 2011 up to most recent of 2017, there’s been a 59% increase in teens reporting depression symptoms. So, why is that? Obviously, there are non-screen related reasons, such as increased focus on performance and competition that has me concerned and individualism. So those that aren’t at that par can often feel less than. In terms of technology, and there is an association, so the more time if people are on, these young people are on a lot of screen times, there is an increased chance that they will report depression symptoms. I think there are three main reasons for that association. I think one is that, yes, things can happen on screens that can cause a young person to go into several weeks of feeling really low and blue and depressed, such as social cruelty or just feeling inundated with feeling left out or less than. What’s concerning too is that the data shows that teens who are already vulnerable emotionally, they’re more likely to report that screen time, social media in particular, makes them feel worse. So, the vulnerable are that much more of an area that we need to focus. The second reason is really concerning about it displacing time that we know is valuable for emotional wellbeing. One huge example is sleep. We’re at basically a public health crisis around sleep and related to the fact that now 41% of teens report that they get less than seven hours of sleep most school nights. Right now, with COVID-19, when I’m talking with teens who are going to bed around two, they’re still sleeping in later, but this is a real problem, because they’re missing classes. They told me they really want help for getting more sleep – displacing time of course with friends and peers and other things that are really protective. The third one is a really big one, is that this association with more time on screens and increased chance of reporting mental health challenge is that when teens are feeling low emotionally, where do they go? They tell me time and again their main coping skill now is going to a screen to not think about the issue or sometimes to get help. Ultimately, they’re no longer as often going to find a person or going to an afterschool program, or work, a job, where they might actually start to really do the types of engagement that will get them over and through their hard emotions as opposed to just mask it as they go day and day, and night and night, on screens. Annette Stevenson: So sometimes, and that might even be the place where the problem started, is then where they’re returning back as their coping mechanism, from what you’re saying. Dr. Delaney Ruston: Absolutely. One of the researchers in Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER says exactly that. That she’s particularly worried of those teens who say, “Social media is making me feel worse, but I can’t stop.” Annette Stevenson: In one of the schools you visited in the film, high school students were talking to middle school students about how to navigate the experiences they’re likely to face as they get older and grow up. A middle school student expresses that they feel more comfortable talking to an older student instead of an adult. When students do talk to adults, how can the adults make students feel comfortable and allow them to open up? Or is that the answer, that they talk to maybe an older mentor student rather than an adult? Dr. Delaney Ruston: I think it is important that all of us know, because I wasn’t aware as much as I should have been that research continuously shows us that the number one place that teens go is to their peers when they’re dealing with a hard emotion. A high percentage still will say that they go to their parents, but obviously a higher percentage go to teens. I got really interested in how do we help, and I’ll get to how adults can help, but I was really interested in how do we help teens get better at using effective evidence-based language and techniques that they can use when their friends are going through hard times. Knowing full well that would help them to feel more confident and gain skills that they teach their friends, they would be learning themselves. In Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, you see this incredible program where teens in high school are teaching middle school kids about specific language using I statements. Really what does active listening and validation really mean? It’s programs I’d love to see all across the country, because when it comes particularly to this kind of touchy-feely stuff, social emotional skills, the last thing we want to do is to kind of talk down to teens and just tell them the obvious, as opposed to have them teach it. I see it constantly how engaged they get. In terms of adults, personally, I can tell you that’s such a big reason I made this film, because when Tessa was going through hard emotional times, even though I have been a doctor for 25 years and I take care of, at times, teenagers and young adults with depression, I felt as a parent completely at a loss of what to do. I needed a lot of help to learn how to support her better, because I kept just going in and problem solving. We got to the point, I would just start to say maybe like one word and she would just be like, “There you go again.” And the last thing I wanted to do is make her leave at the moment I thought I maybe would have a connection with her. In Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, when you follow, one of the stories is our story. You follow that journey as I’m struggling of what to do. I really began to appreciate what’s called the art of validation. So many parents who’ve had kids go through this hard time say, “Why didn’t someone teach me about validation before?” And it’s really active listening and empathy. It’s not necessarily saying you’re agreeing with what they’re saying. It’s just truly listening in a way that lets them say their emotions. Even though you have such this desire to say, “Okay, have you tried this? Have you tried that?” I have a huge list of reasons that teens tell me why that doesn’t work and makes it worse. And I’ll give just two right now. One of the big ones is they feel like you don’t trust that they can come up with solutions. That’s a huge issue that they want autonomy and to feel trusted. In fact, the number one thing when I ask teens over the 10 years of doing this work, what is the one thing you want your parents to know? And they’ll say, “I want them to trust me.” They don’t mean, trust me that I’m not going to cheat and kind of steal more screen time, because five minutes later they tell me about the way they’re sneaking screen time. It’s just like we’re the number one group in their lives, people in their lives, that they need us to believe in them because so often they’re not believing in themselves. I mean, it’s a rocky road growing up, boy. So, that’s one. Another big one is by not jumping into problem solve, is that it shows them that we know that hard emotions are a part of life. That we’re not trying to just get rid of them. Okay, you have that emotion, but let’s get to here to there. It’s like, yep, that’s hard. And that acceptance is a really wonderful thing. Actually, if you’ve ever tried it, because I’ve had some really hard times in my life. As I’ve learned to, at moments, just accept it and not be fighting. I actually can literally feel the tension and the sadness just decrease a little bit. It’s similar for teens. So ultimately, to wrap this part up, and I could talk forever about this. Is I went to a scientist, because I was in my research in the film, learned that she had actually done physiologic studies of parents and their teens. When a teen is given a puzzle on a computer that they’re not able to solve, and the parent is told whatever you do, don’t go in and try to solve it. Just watch and see what happens. Time after time the parent steps in and tries to help. And she’s actually measuring the physiology of the teens and the parents at the same time. The moment that the parents steps into problem solve, basically, literally you can see the parents’ stress level go down, and that of the teen go up. What I’ve learned to do in response, knowing this science is to realize how important it is for them to feel a sense of control. I’ll say to both my teens, if they’re having a hard time and it’s hard for me, I still work on it. I’ll say, “That sounds really hard. I’m curious what solutions you’re thinking of.” Or I’ll say, “Let me know if you want help in trying to problem solve things.” That goes really well. Annette Stevenson: Because you’re putting that control back on them to say, “Yes, I’d like help.” Or, “No, I would not like help.” Dr. Delaney Ruston: Exactly. Annette Stevenson: So hard. And as you mentioned, the parent’s stress level goes up. So that’s like the parent urge, the parent has to fight that urge to step in. Dr. Delaney Ruston: Exactly. Annette, let me say, because you were actually specifically just saying adults, but I think it’s the same thing for teachers. It’s interesting. This didn’t make it into Screenagers NEXT CHAPTER, but I was, as an outsider, going in and talking to, interviewing and filming a lot of teachers, I would say, “What do you learn in education school about relationships and communications with students?” They would look at me like I was kind of silly to even ask. They go, “No, no, no. We don’t learn anything about that.” I was shocked. Then I thought to myself, well, as a doctor when I was in medical school, how much do we learn about communication techniques in what we’re doing as doing really important interface with families and our patients? So that was another impetus for doing this documentary. I ended up after my residency in primary care doing a research fellowship. I started doing research on interpersonal communication science, because there are actual specific things we can be teaching people. While I know we talk a lot about kids and teens are losing their communication skills. I often think about the fact that, gosh, I know a lot of people who didn’t grow up with much screen time and they’re not really good communicators. So I feel like this is really a moment in time that we can really be teaching specific skills more and I would love to see that more and obviously in all realms of education as the adults, physicians, and us parents, all of us can get better. I’m on a constant journey to get more effective in my communication skills with colleagues and family members and all of that. I’m talking about when there’s emotions at stake and relationships. Annette Stevenson: I’m going to jump ahead a little bit, because we’re talking about screen time of course as part of this. Students and parents are spending more time together as families. We’re isolated right now due to the spread, or the prevention rather, of the spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic. So what symptoms can parents look for that could give them a signal that their children might be experiencing mental health concerns, or maybe anxiety, or issues stemming…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    COVID-19: Shining a Light on Student and Community Inequities Apr 16, 2020
    Show notes

    About this Episode Time Stamps Transcript Resources The COVID-19 pandemic has changed all parts of daily life for Pennsylvanians – the same is true for the 1.7 million students who live in the commonwealth. Most students are now faced with navigating digital or at-home learning, coping with canceled spring school activities and the uncertainty of what comes next. For other students, shuttered schools mean the inability to access online schoolwork and looking after younger siblings. On this episode of Keystone Education Radio, Annette Stevenson is joined by Dr. Heather Bennett, PSBA’s director of school equity services, to discuss the existing equity issues that the pandemic has further brought to light.This episode is brought to you in part by Austill’s Educational Therapy Services and Edgenuity. Skip to: 01:22 How has the current COVID-19 pandemic and precautionary measures such as closed schools and closed businesses impacted existing inequities that K – 12 students are regularly faced with? It’s important that we recognize that the equity gaps are not just seen in our education system, it’s seen in our employment, economic, housing, healthcare, and environmental systems as well. This whole experience has definitely shifted and I think caused I would call a community trauma that everyone’s experiencing and issues of fear, anxiety, the increasing isolation has definitely led to a lot of mental health concerns for everyone. Skip to: 06:40 Does it take something this major to ultimately fully reveal the layers of inequitable factors that exist in the student and community populace? Some schools had the opportunity and the resources to provide digital learning, resources, tools and training to their students, teachers and parents, while other districts did not have the economic or the technological infrastructure and resources to do so. One of our other problems is that we’re still stuck viewing our educational system through an equality lens instead of an equity lens. Skip to: 11:11 How can school districts work within these challenging parameters that are necessary (due to risks surrounding Coronavirus) to address some of the gaps and continue to support students who are more susceptible or vulnerable? I think schools stand as the center of the community. They’re not just in charge of and responsible for the education of students, but they also reach out to multiple different other systems. My advice to districts after this is over when you have the time to breathe, conduct an equity audit. Skip to: 16:18 What do believe will be the outcome, coming out of the COVID-19 Coronavirus outbreak? And more specifically, how will things have changed for students who prior to the outbreak were already struggling in some of the areas you’ve addressed? I think districts recognize that equity is playing front and center here. They’re really are seeing that our kids cannot learn if we don’t really deal with the inequitable root issues that were of access to basic needs, access to technology, access to digital learning. I think we’re going to see opportunity achievement gaps widen because of the fact that some students don’t have access to the resources needed to be able to engage effectively and adequately with digital learning. We have a tendency to move quickly in times of crisis, but then as time moves on, we forget and we go back to the status quo and we cannot go back to the status quo here. We really have to dig deep here and recognize that this is an opportunity to actually re-shift a system. Equity is not just a topic and has to be the foundation that lifts up every aspect of the educational experience for students, staff and community members and of course our board directors. Annette Stevenson: The current COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic has changed and disrupted so many areas of daily life for citizens globally. And one of the disruptions that’s occurred – and certainly in no small part – is the disruption to the public education system in our country, globally and, of course, also here in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania’s K-12 school entities are currently shuttered through the remainder of this academic year, and this has vastly impacted how the youth are being educated and how schools are operating, and this introduces new challenges that are unprecedented. Here with me today to discuss how COVID-19 has impacted equity in the public education system is Dr. Heather Bennett, director of equity services for PSBA. Welcome Heather.Dr. Heather Bennett: Hi, how are you? Annette Stevenson: Great. Thanks so much for joining us to talk about this. We certainly have talked about equity in other ways before this outbreak has occurred, but it’s very clear to see that this is no small impact to the equity or student inequity conversation. So, let’s start by looking at how has the current COVID-19 pandemic and the precautionary measures such as closed schools, closed businesses, impacted the existing inequities that K-12 students are regularly faced with? Dr. Heather Bennett: Well, that’s a big question. Annette Stevenson: Yeah, I know. Dr. Heather Bennett: I think it’s really important to understand that COVID-19 as a virus does not discriminate on its face, but it does serve and act as an inequity bomb or an inequity accelerant, throwing gasoline on an already explosive fire, that regarding the deep inequities that we already see in our educational system already. So it’s important that we recognize that the equity gaps are not just seen in our education system, it’s seen in our employment, economic, housing, healthcare, and environmental systems as well. And so we know that these gaps existed well before the pandemic, but unfortunately I think we’re going to see that they’re only going to widen. Again, that’s what I meant by an equity accelerant over the course of the pandemic and beyond. And it’s important to recognize that even though this is impacting everyone in all of society that is disproportionately impacting certain groups that are already at risk prior to the pandemic. We’re talking about economically disadvantaged students, English learners, students with disabilities, students who’ve experienced trauma and mental health, immigrant students, LGBTQ students, students of color and those who are living in rural communities who don’t have access to certain resources such as healthcare and internet connectivity. So in terms of issues, hopefully I gave you a nice little roundabout explanation of that. But in terms of issues, we’re seeing increased discrimination of Asian students and families. They’re experiencing higher rates of racist attacks verbally, physically and online because of the fact that the pandemic, we know, was first discovered in Wuhan, China. We’re experiencing a whole lot of racism on behalf of Asian Americans on behalf of that. We’re talking about access to digital learning and instruction, is a huge issue as well. We have a disparate, inequitable educational gap when it comes to access to devices, access to internet connectivity – meaning high speed broadband internet connectivity, and, of course, access to instruction for teachers to be able to utilize the device and to teach online. Also, the choice of instruction – how are we educating our most vulnerable learners such as English learners, economically disadvantaged learners and of course students with disabilities. We’re talking about access to basic needs, food, housing, transportation, healthcare. We’re talking about issues of trauma and mental health, not just for students but also for parents and communities and also teachers. This whole experience has definitely shifted and I think caused, I would call, a community trauma that everyone’s experiencing. Issues of fear, anxiety, the increasing isolation has definitely led to a lot of mental health concerns for everyone. Again, lack of effective communication about COVID-19. I mean we’re hearing a thousand different things from our federal government, to our state, to our local government. Then also anything we find on our social media sites. Also, the fact is, is the important information getting out to our most vulnerable families? Families who English is not their first language. Language is important. Also, internet connectivity is important here. Again, we are more isolated, we can’t actually go to the places to get the information like we used to. If we’re talking about families who don’t have access to high speed broadband internet, they’re not getting the information as quickly as others. Especially if all that information is on the school website. I mean there’s other [issues] like family community engagement, how are they engaged, dealing with issues of employment, loss of jobs. [It’s] not just the financial stress happening in our homes across the country and across Pennsylvania, [it’s also] the fact that essential workers have no choice but to work and risk getting the virus. So that emotional stress is also impacting our students and our families. There’re a thousand issues but those are the ones I would say are the big issues. But all of them also have smaller, distinct, very nuanced issues as well. And again, these issues are not new, they’re just been exasperated and exposed through COVID-19. Annette Stevenson: That leads into what I was curious about next is, do you feel like it takes something this major to ultimately fully peel back the layers or reveal all of the inequities or at least the ones that we’re centered around in this conversation that exists in the student and the community populous? Does it take something like this to actually expose it fully? Dr. Heather Bennett: It shouldn’t, but unfortunately, I think how we’ve operated, our systems operate in a space of reaction, reactionary mindsets more than a preemptive mindset. I think most districts and schools recognized the inequities well before COVID-19. Actually, we’re developing programs and policies to deal with some of these inequities. However, these are systemic, deep rooted inequities that will take a complete transformation and paradigm shift in how we view and value our students and communities, and, also, how we resource our communities. For example, we’ve always known that digital learning was an important thing before the pandemic – everyone understood, there’s been so many research and articles and state grants that have talked about the importance of digital equity and digital learning. However, due to inequitable funding and resources rooted sometimes in systemic racism, classism, and also the fact that we have the lack of resources to build the infrastructure for some of these digital learning classrooms [because of] internet connectivity. Some schools had the opportunity and the resources to provide digital learning, resources, tools and training to their students, teachers and parents, while other districts did not have the economic or the technological infrastructure and resources to do so. So like I said, it’s deep, these are deep rooted issues, people have thought about them before, but we really are dealing with the resource gap big time that have led these inequities to continue and also to exasperate. We see this dynamic big time in our urban and rural communities and districts. So when we went to remote learning, and I don’t want to go in too deep, but when went to remote learning, digital learning was the way to provide instruction, but not everyone has had access to the things that they need to be able to provide that instruction. While other districts have had so much time prior to the pandemic to actually develop the resources and the tools to do it effectively. This is why we’re seeing this really big gap and again, I believe that it’s only going to widen because of the nature of how this pandemic has ravaged our system. I think we are still stuck. One of our other problems is that we’re still stuck viewing our educational system through an equality lens instead of an equity lens. We haven’t recognized that our kids require different supports and may need more resources to provide them with a quality education. This requires districts to really assess their gaps, to really look and do a deep dive at their systems and structures. I mean, I’m talking about their policies, talking about how they engage families and communities, talking about how they think about their own resources and prioritizing resources, how they educate their teachers and staff. I think that can go a long way to really trying to figure out a plan and action to mitigate some of these inequities because without that it’s going to be very hard to address it effectively. Annette Stevenson: I think, some of what at least that I’ve seen, and you may be more keenly aware of this, but the communities, it’s clear through this whole thing how integrated the community is with the school system. It’s really not a separate thing, the community and then the school system. They’re really so integrated and reliant, right? The community, I think what we’ve seen is communities are reliant on, to some degree, the public schools, especially in some communities, as you’ve said, for information that gets passed out through the students. And just the reliance there I think I’m seeing that more and more, especially through some of the stories that are coming out of the districts in the ways that they’re supporting the communities presently. So how do you think that school districts, working with these challenging parameters that are necessary, right? So due to the risks, health risks surrounding coronavirus, how can the school districts address some of the gaps and continue to support the students who are the more susceptible or the more vulnerable? How can they continue that equity work in these current circumstances? Dr. Heather Bennett: I think you’ve made an amazing point there. I think schools stand as the center of the community. They’re not just in charge of and responsible for the education of students, but they also reach out to multiple different other systems, like the healthcare system, employment system, the environmental issues and concerns of the system, we’re talking about economic system. So the school district itself I think serves as a focal point of the community. And what we’ve seen is that they’re providing safety, wellness, nutrition, technology needs for students and families in this situation. They were always doing so beforehand. I think schools have a really important role to play, but also that if it’s done correctly, can actually heal a community as well. I think one of the first things that I would advise to continue this work is they really need to talk to and include the voices of their students, parents and communities into any type of planning moving forward. I know continuity educational plans went out, but any type of actual planning moving forward has to include these voices. Cultural responsive practices really focus on and affirm the diverse voices and experiences of students, families and the communities and how each community is experiencing this virus and this pandemic in very divergent and disparate ways. It is so important that their voices are heard to be able to really understand the gaps, understand the disparity gaps, understanding inequity gaps that are impacting their district as a whole. It’s really important to see it from different viewpoints and to really reach out and create really a task force of these voices. So that they can actually start to make practices to really heal and mitigate the impact of this, of the pandemic, but not just the pandemic, but even before the pandemic. I say they need to embed equity into their district practices. I’m thinking about, they have to evaluate their policies and practices through an equity lens. Again, I think the most important element is to get out of this equality lens framework and move into an equity lens framework and what doe…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Uncharted waters: Navigating unemployment compensation for school employees during COVID-19 Apr 02, 2020
    Show notes

    About this Episode Time Stamps Transcript In this timely episode of Keystone Education Radio, Geoffrey D. Moomaw, President of Interstate Tax Service, Inc., provides guidance on how schools should proceed with unemployment compensation during the COVID-19 outbreak. He discusses the newly passed Act 13; how it impacts teachers, school contractors and coaches; and the further guidance that PDE is expected to provide. This episode is sponsored by the PSBA Insurance Trust, Kades-Margolis Corporation and Piper Sandler LLP. Skip to: 00:57 Are school entities supposed to be paying full wages to all employees?Skip to: 01:50 As far as paying full wages, does this include the IUs and the CTCs and community colleges as well? Skip to: 02:31 Would this include sports coaches that are not full or part-time teachers, such as those utilized during the spring season? And then that spring season’s been canceled, how does that group of employees fall into the picture Skip to: 04:03 In Senate Bill 751 it states that all school employees should receive no less or no more compensation for the fiscal year had the pandemic not happened. What constitutes, in that language, a school employee? Skip to: 7:03 Can you provide a little bit of context around the no more or less compensation verbiage, the use of that language? Skip to: 09:28 If schools choose not to pay some subcontracted service professionals such as bus drivers, cafeteria workers, their full wages, how would this, or does it, affect future funding? Skip to: 10:33 For many of the part-time and hourly employees that submitted their unemployment compensation claims prior to Senate Bill 751 and the updated legislative guidance that was received, how do schools address these claims? Annette Stevenson: Let’s jump into some of the questions that we’ve been receiving and I’m sure you’ve been fielding them. Are school entities supposed to be paying full wages to all employees?Geoffrey Moomaw: Yes, that is correct. That’s one of the provisions of Senate Bill 751. I want to let everyone know why my expertise is unemployment compensation. I did some research and preparation and got some feedback from the executive director of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives’ Education Committee, which is the committee that worked on Senate Bill 751 as it dealt with the Pennsylvania school code. So, I have some backup for the answers you will hear today from that executive director. Let’s go ahead and continue. Annette Stevenson: Yeah, that’s great. Thank you for that context. That’s hugely important since there’s so much information out there to wade through. So as far as paying full wages, does this include the IUs and the CTCs and community colleges as well? Geoffrey Moomaw: It does include the intermediate units. It does include the career and technology centers. It does not include community colleges. I did confirm that with the executive director. Didn’t clarify, but I believe that community colleges may not fall under the Pennsylvania school code. I can’t clarify that, but I did clarify that they’re not covered by the provisions of Senate Bill 751. Annette Stevenson: Okay. Would this include sports coaches that are not full or part-time teachers, such as those utilized during the spring season? And then that spring season’s been canceled, how does that group of employees fall into the picture? Geoffrey Moomaw: That isn’t exactly clear. My initial reaction is I would assume no, the reason being such an employee signed a supplemental contract with the school. Now, those wages they receive as a coach are covered by the Pennsylvania UC law. That’s unemployment compensation law. When I did though check with the executive director of the Education Committee, the response I got was that the Pennsylvania Department of ED, PDE, is going to issue guidance on this. So, at this point I would suggest that you hold still on that issue and wait for PDE’s guidance because I cannot clarify for you that you definitely should pay them or that you definitely should not. I think it would be better to have the official guidance from PDE, so then you have some legal basis for your action or inaction. Annette Stevenson: Okay, that makes sense. And I know some of these questions are definitely on a wait-and-see kind of basis as many of the questions are that the school leaders are facing. So, in Senate Bill 751 it states that all school employees should receive no less or no more compensation for the fiscal year had the pandemic not happened. What constitutes, in that language, a school employee? Geoffrey Moomaw: A school employee would be any individual that you pay wages to that are wages that can be covered under the unemployment compensation law. Each calendar quarter, your payroll office uploads a file to the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry that has the wages for all employees for the past calendar quarter. As an example, in April, they’ll do that for the first quarter of 2020. If somebody was on that report, then they are considered an employee of the school district and as such they would be required to be paid no more, no less per SB 751. Annette Stevenson: Okay, and would this include subcontractors? Geoffrey Moomaw: No. No’s the short and simple answer. The reason being, what you pay them is not wages as far as the unemployment compensation law’s concerned. So that company and the individuals employed under that company are not considered employees of the school, the intermediate unit, the technical center. I’m going to read what I did get back from the Education Committee. They say, “No, it does not include subcontractors. This would be left as a local decision. Pursuant to Act 13, school districts may renegotiate with their school bus contractors to continue paying them during school closure for employees’ costs and other fixed costs such as administration and equipment. School bus contractors must submit proof that they are continuing to pay their personnel at the complement levels of March 13, 2020 in order to receive payment. State reimbursement is available to school districts at the same level they would have received if the schools had not shut down. Obviously, schools can already renegotiate contracts, but this provides that they will still get reimbursements if they do.” I would add if somebody is really looking for clarification on that matter to contact their folks at PDE. It doesn’t say that there’s further guidance forthcoming, but that is definitely a question that would be governed by PDE. Annette Stevenson: Okay. Can you provide a little bit of context around the no more or less compensation verbiage, the use of that language? Some schools think that they can have employees apply for unemployment compensation benefits and then the schools will make them whole for the remainder, but this would appear to be a contradiction to eligibility under unemployment compensation law. Can you clarify around that? Geoffrey Moomaw: Certainly I’ll break it down there. Senate Bill 751 indicates that the employees are to get no more or no less. I asked a question to the Education Committee, “Would you agree that a school employee whose normal, biweekly payroll is $800 gross, should continue to receive that $800 through the end of the student year?” The answer I got back is what I expected. It said, “Yes, but PDE will be issuing additional guidance.” I apologize. I can’t indicate what that additional guidance will be, but the short and sweet answer as you heard was yes. Now the sub-question about, “Okay, let’s make up the difference from unemployment,” that is not the intent of Senate Bill 751. And if you actually did that, it would mess up unemployment further. Not to get too technical, but the unemployment law allows somebody to earn a percentage of their weekly unemployment benefit. If they earn that percentage, their unemployment benefits are reduced. So if the district tries to then make up the difference between unemployment and what they used to get, it’s just going to reduce or eliminate their unemployment benefits. I strongly advise any educational institution not to try that. It’s not what the intent was, and they’re only going to make things more difficult. Annette Stevenson: Okay. That’s very, very good. Thank you for that clarification. Now, you touched on the subcontracted services such as for bus drivers, but I’m going to ask this question just to make sure we covered everything. If schools choose not to pay some subcontracted service professionals such as bus drivers, cafeteria workers, their full wages, how would this, or does it, affect future funding? Geoffrey Moomaw: When I read that question the first time, I’m like, “That’s definitely outside of my expertise.” But the Education Committee agreed to me, what I said to them. I’m like, “This is a question that must be addressed by PDE.” And I got back the short answer, “Agreed.” Again, PDE is going to have to give the educational institutions some guidance that, okay, if I don’t pay ABC transportation company through the remainder of this year, how will it affect my reimbursement for 2021 fiscal year? I understand the question. I understand the concern. But I definitely recommend that your superintendent, your solicitor, whoever, get guidance from PDE on that. Annette Stevenson: Okay, that’s good to know. So, for many of the part-time and hourly employees that submitted their unemployment compensation claims prior to Senate Bill 751 and the updated legislative guidance that was received, how do schools address these claims? Geoffrey Moomaw: Okay. First of all, you had employees file for benefits during the calendar week ending on Saturday, March 21st. A lot of them may have filed at that time because of course there was no Senate Bill 751 yet and also your local school board board of directors had not made a decision as to whether or not you would pay employees through that initial two-week closure. So, don’t get upset if they filed because their initial reaction is they know they’re hourly and if they don’t work, they usually don’t get paid. If they filed a claim, it’s a two-step process. You open the unemployment claim, then you’re notified to file your biweekly claim 10 to 14 days later. When someone files their biweekly claim, they must verify to Labor and Industry that they did not work and that they did not get paid. If your employees have filed their biweekly claim and reported that they got paid, the unemployment benefits should not be released. I know that benefits are going to be released to individuals, I’m going to say, improperly. Again, not always by fraud. As an example, in talking to schools, you may send out notice that everyone’s getting paid. You do that electronically. Are you telling me 100% of your employees read every email they get from the administration? I politely think that’s not the case. But for educational institutions, a quarterly statement of account is issued summarizing all the benefits that were paid for the past calendar quarter. So, for Pennsylvania schools here in mid-April, that statement of account will be issued. If you’re part of PSBA’s program or if I happen to represent you outside of PSBA’s program, we receive that information. If you’re handling unemployment by yourself, you will receive that. If you’re doing it by yourself, you will receive a report detailing the benefits for January, February and March. My company will receive it if you’re with PSBA or with us directly. If John or Jane Doe appear on that statement and you check your record and can see that was somebody that was a paraprofessional who got their normal paycheck, and I’m emphasizing gross pay, then they should not have gotten that benefits, but it occurred. There is something we refer to as a protest mechanism, where via the unemployment office you can protest those benefits that were paid. Technically, an investigation would commence. A determination which is a written decision should be issued finding that John or Jane Doe was not unemployed as their earnings were X, and therefore they are ineligible. That would trigger the process where credits would be issued to your account on a future statement. I’ve advised many of the schools that I’ve talked to that’s going to be our best method to watch, to contest, because there is no way that an individual employer can get online and to see what benefits are released. Pennsylvania is just not that modern yet. We’re working on it though. So, we deal with the notices that are sent out. When we receive them, we react. For all Pennsylvania schools, as I mentioned, there is a quarterly unemployment statement that comes out mid-April. One will come out mid-July. But there is also a monthly notice that lists the individuals that collected benefits. So, in mid-May a notice will come out showing who got benefits in the month of April. For those schools I’m working with, I’m going to be sending that to all of them with the polite suggestion, “Review this closely. Let me know if you see any issues.” If you’re handling unemployment on your own, I would strongly suggest you do the same. If you feel somebody got benefits improperly, you are able to again protest it with the unemployment office. And basically, when you initiate that protest it starts the investigation and hopefully a written determination will be issued. Annette Stevenson: Yeah, that is clearly some pretty complex matter that you’re working your way through and that our business managers at the school districts are working their way through. So, I sure do appreciate the clarification around these frequently asked questions. And I think that concludes what we were interested in knowing today, but I’d sure love to come back to you with more questions if our members have them. Geoffrey Moomaw: I certainly would welcome that opportunity. In kind of wrapping up, this is a complex issue, one of great concern. I understand it’s a whole new ballgame for all of us. Feel free folks, if you have questions, to address them to Annette, to the PSBA. If I work with you, you can contact me directly. I’m here to assist you in any way possible to keep your unemployment costs as low as possible. So, don’t be bashful. You have resources such as PSBA and my firm. Use us. That’s what we’re there for. I hope everyone’s doing well and please take care. Annette Stevenson: Thank you so much Geoff, and thanks for spending time with us on this episode of Keystone Education Radio. The post Uncharted waters: Navigating unemployment compensation for school employees during COVID-19 appeared first on Keystone Education Radio.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Earth Day Celebrates 50 Years: Launching Earth Challenge 2020 Mar 17, 2020
    Show notes

    About this Episode Time Stamps Transcript About our Guest Resources On April 22, 1970, 10 percent of the U.S. population joined together to demand protection for the environment. In this episode of Keystone Education Radio, Earth Day Network (EDN) Education Coordinator Kira Heeschen joins us to discuss Earth Day’s upcoming 50th anniversary, the world’s largest coordinated citizen science campaign, Earth Challenge 2020 and the importance of student and youth involvement. This episode is sponsored by SiteLogic and The Nutrition Group. Skip to: 01:42 What was the catalyst for the first Earth Day, and what action did this movement prompt over the past 50 years? We see Earth Day as this day where people come together to both remember the history of where we’ve been and how much we’ve achieved, but also how much more we have to do. Skip to: 05:12 Why was the Earth Day Network formed, and what role does the organization play in the environmental movement today? We like to say that Earth Day is not just a day, it’s a movement and our goal is to raise awareness around environmental issues that are impacting communities and globally. We really try to put the tools out there and empower communities to take on these leadership roles in their communities and give them the tool and knowledge that they need to have impactful change. So what we try to do is use Earth Day as a focal point every year to concentrate environmental action and to really build and sustain momentum throughout the year. For 2020, we have decided on a theme of climate action just because so many different environmental issues feed into this larger umbrella issue of climate change. Skip to: 08:15 Earth Challenge 2020 is the world’s largest coordinated citizen science campaign. This initiative was created in partnership with the Wilson Center and the U.S. Department of State. In April, an app will allow users to collect billions of observations and valuable environmental insights into air quality, plastic pollution and insect populations. With technology being so prevalent in classrooms today, can you tell us a little more about this initiative and the app? The Earth Challenge 2020 app, the initiatives goal was to allow people to be connected with the scientific process and to have them contribute to global data that helps us understand the state of health of our environment. The plastic side of the app is tied with our global cleanup program. And so anyone who’s participating in the cleanup throughout 2020 is definitely encouraged to use this app so that we’re both cleaning up the litter and the pollution that we’re seeing out in our environment, but we’re learning from those experiences as well. Skip to: 13:45 In your role with Earth Day Network, you facilitate programming for educators. What resources are available to the school audience? Skip to: 17:41 It is important for everyone to get involved in environmental advocacy efforts. Why is the Earth Day Network specifically focusing on engaging youth in Earth Day 2020? From the big global examples like we have with Gretta, it’s just this incredible movement of students all over the world who are saying, this is our future we’re talking about, the health of our future and our goals that we would like for our lives. So we’re going to step up and fight to protect it. Annette Stevenson: What was the catalyst, if we can go back some years, 50 years, what was the catalyst for the first Earth Day? What action did this movement prompt over these past 50 years and where did it begin? Kira Heeschen: 50 years ago, in 1970, the first Earth Day occurred, and in the 50 years prior to that, our country saw this enormous surge in industrialization. Around this time, we had really immense air and water pollution from industry. We had really strong lead gas emissions from really inefficient cars. The disposable lifestyle was really on the upswing. We had this peak level of pollution throughout the United States. The book Silent Spring came out in 1962, that was a really formative event in the environmental movement by Rachel Carson. She released this book that was explaining how pollutants and pesticides were impacting our natural world. That really woke a lot of people up. Then throughout the year of 1969, the Cuyahoga river in Ohio caught on fire because it was so polluted. And there was an oil spill, a pretty significant oil spill, off the coast of California near Santa Barbara. So all of these things were coalescing together to have people start to notice how polluted their environment had become. Human health was a really big issue, urban smog was really big. So what happened was Senator Gaylord Nelson from Wisconsin was looking around at all this and also paying attention to some of the social movements that were going on at the time. The late sixties and early seventies was really big for the antiwar movement in Vietnam as well as the civil rights movement. He was looking at all of these things coming together and decided that he wanted to host a national teach-in on the environment. To have a day where everyone in the United States really came together to decide that the environment was worth protecting, that human health was worth putting this effort into. So he created this bipartisan committee of senators and they hired a whole team of college students around the country who were going to plan this teach-in. Without any social media, without the internet, they were able to get 20 million Americans to take to the streets on April 22nd, 1970 to demand that their government were to take care of the environment, to clean up pollution, to really take care of human health. Within the end of that year, the EPA was formed, the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts were passed and similar laws and organizations similar to the EPA were starting to be passed in countries all over the world. This day really brought together young and old Americans, urban and rural. It was a very bipartisan day, and so it was this spark plug of this day that brought people’s attention to the environment and had people come together to decide that we wanted better. Since then, the past 50 years, we see Earth Day as this day where people come together to both remember the history of where we’ve been and how much we’ve achieved, but also how much more we have to do. It’s really just a day where people can bond over this shared commitment to the environment and for every community that looks so different, but there’s all of these similar values and goals that underlie the day that really brings people together. Annette Stevenson: Earth Day Network as an organization, why was that formed and what role does the organization play in today’s environmental movement? Kira Heeschen: Earth Day Network has come out of this movement, and as Earth Days started to pass, some of the original organizers decided that there should be a nonprofit that coordinates a lot of these efforts. Dennis Hayes, who was actually the national organizer hired by Gaylord Nelson, he was a student at Harvard at the time. He really took on this leadership role in organizing Earth Day, year to year, and so he’s actually still our board chair emeritus, he’s still very involved with everything that we’re doing. The organization really plays this role in trying to bring people together around this common mission. We like to say that Earth Day is not just a day, it’s a movement. Our goal is to really raise awareness around environmental issues that are strongly impacting communities and impacting globally. What we try to do is we want to raise awareness on these issues. A lot of times, it’s hard to find trustworthy and factual information about what’s going on out there. We really like to try to put that information out there and to really build capacity in the general public for them to be able to take actions in their communities. So that looks again, very different for every community, because a small town in Iowa is going to look very different, their environmental issues are going to look very different from a small town in Taiwan. We really try to put the tools out there and empower communities to take on these leadership roles in their communities and give them the tools and the knowledge that they need to have impactful change. What we try to do is use Earth Day as a focal point every year to concentrate environmental action and to really build and sustain momentum throughout the year. We do this by setting yearly themes, trying to bring people around these common issues every year to really build momentum on them and then bring in these coalitions of partners and audience who want to join in on this movement and really mobilize together around the issues that we’re facing. Annette Stevenson: As you said, the issues may change and also there’s the uniqueness of different regions in different countries that might be facing different issues. Is that correct to say? Kira Heeschen: Yeah, absolutely. In 1990, the 20th anniversary of Earth Day, recycling was the biggest issue that everyone was talking about. It was such a huge global issue, and it’s interesting because we kind of see that coming back. Some of our recycling systems are breaking down a little bit. We see these issues cycle through, and I think especially throughout this year, different organizations are all focusing on different things. For 2020 we have decided on a theme of climate action just because so many different environmental issues feed into this larger umbrella issue of climate change. So that’s what we’re working on this year, but we really want communities to feel empowered to focus in on what’s really going to benefit their community members. Annette Stevenson: Earth Challenge 2020 is the world’s largest coordinated citizen science campaign. This initiative was created in partnership with the Wilson Center and the US Department of State. In April, an app will allow users to collect billions of observations and valuable environmental insights into air quality, plastic pollution and insect populations. With technology being so prevalent in classrooms today, can you tell us a little more about this particular initiative and the app that’s part of it? Kira Heeschen: Yeah, definitely. It’s amazing just how much technology has changed in the past year, in the past five years, in classrooms. Because when I was in high school, absolutely no technology and now we have class sets of iPads and phones and laptops for them to be able to utilize this technology in a way that really impacts their learning, which I think is fantastic. So the Earth Challenge 2020 App, the initiative’s goal was to really allow people to be connected with the scientific process and to have them contribute to global data that helps us understand the state of health of our environment. Citizen science as a greater field is just this incredible field that allows normal citizens to be involved in the scientific process and to contribute really meaningful data to the scientific community. What we wanted Earth Challenge to do was to provide that opportunity for them to collect data, but then for them to have a little bit of an extended experience with that data so that they had the opportunity to learn what that data means for them and what they can do about it. So the two widgets that we have available right now are air quality and plastic pollution. We will have some more available throughout the year, insect populations being one of them. They are still in development. What we want users to do is to go in and they’re going to collect data, they’re going to be provided with information on how they can take action on their data. Then they’re also going to have the opportunity to interact with open source data that exists around the world. This is a piece that I think is really valuable for educators. If they wanted to be able to provide these experiences in the classroom where students are sorting through global data and trying to make meaning out of it and understand what it means for the health of their communities and the health of communities around the world. What we did to establish this app is we asked researchers all over the world, what environmental data do we need to better understand the health of our planet? We were actually able to get feedback from researchers from all seven continents, including Antarctica, which is very exciting. We came up with these widgets that we were going to do to explore the topics that they suggested. So air quality and plastic pollution were two of the really, really big ones. What users will do when they’re using the app is they’ll take a photo, either of the sky or of a piece of plastic that they find in their environment. With the Plastic App, they’re going to go in, submit either photos of plastic that they come upon throughout their normal day, or they’re going to submit photos of plastic and overall litter that they’re collecting during their cleanup efforts that they’re doing for Earth Day. They’re going to submit it to help build that data of what kind of litter is out there. They can identify the litter and then they’re going to be fed these action items. So it’s saying, “Okay, you came across this litter, what can you do about it?” Here’s some things in your country that are relevant and can help empower you to fix the issue of pollution in your community. In the Air Quality App, you will take a picture of the sky and it will geolocate to the nearest high–quality air monitoring system. And it will tell you what your air quality is. Now you might see that number and think, okay, so what does that mean? The app will then give you more information about is that number good? Is it bad? If it is bad, what are some things that you can do both in your personal life to have a lesser impact on air quality? Then as a citizen, what are some actions that you can take to influence policies that are going to protect air quality or community-based solutions that could help. It’s just a really great way to balance both collecting data that’s going to contribute to environmental knowledge, but then also being able to empower and build capacity for citizens to then take action. Annette Stevenson: Is this app intended for everyone, beyond the education and the student community as an educational or student project? Is this available to anyone? Kira Heeschen: Yes, definitely. So we definitely think this app is a great tool for educators to use with their students to have a really great unit on either of these topics, but we also want any other citizen, wide diversity of age and location to feel like they are really contributing to the global understanding of environmental health by collecting this data. Any person going through and collecting this data is helping us better understand the health of our environment. Anyone can learn how better they can help protect the environment. Additionally, the plastic side of the app is tied with our Great Global Cleanup program. So anyone who’s participating in the cleanup throughout 2020 is definitely encouraged to use this app so that we’re both cleaning up the litter and the pollution that we’re seeing out in our environment, but we’re learning from those experiences as well. Annette Stevenson: In your role with Earth Day Network, you do facilitate programming for educators. What resources are available to the school audience? Kira Heeschen: Yes, great question. So as the education coordinator here, my job is to find opportunities and provide support for educators to be involved in Earth Day’s 50th anniversary this year. The first thing that we did is we created a couple of lesson plans around these earth challenge topics. On our website you can find three levels of difficulty activities around both air pollution and plastic pollution. And then as further widgets are released, we’ll have more lesson plans go up for those as well. And so these are beginner,…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Flourish or fail: A conversation about grit with Angela Duckworth Mar 03, 2020
    Show notes

    This Episode Time Stamps Transcript Our Guest Resources Host Annette Stevenson talks with best-selling author, psychologist and professor at the University of Pennsylvania Angela Duckworth. Duckworth unpacks her book Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance and provides further insight into her research of the characteristics of high achieving individuals. This episode is sponsored by Siemens & Edgenuity. Skip to: 01:46 Explanation of Research/Defining GritSkip to: 03:23 In the public education system, how do you think teachers and parents can help children discover their interests while also meeting the parameters of an established curriculum? I think it’s so important that throughout their K-12 experience, we’ve planted the seeds so that they can find a career that is intrinsically enjoyable much of the day, if not all of the day. Skip to: 05:46 What advice would you give to young adults who feel they don’t have direction at this stage of life? Interests are like foods, you don’t really know if you’ll like it or not until you experience it. Skip to: 08:00 What is Deliberate Practice? The psychology of attention is that you cannot divide it without real compromise to your learning. Skip to: 11:21 How important do you think a growth mindset is to overcoming adversity? Every time a child fails is an opportunity to strengthen their growth mindset by modeling for them and being very clear that failure is sometimes even a good sign. Because it means you tried to do something you can’t yet do which means that you were challenging yourself. Even successful people don’t easily learn from mistakes. There’s an anxiety about mistake making that crowds out learning sometimes. Skip to: 17:28 How do you think a culture of Grit can be developed or incorporated into the school environment? Annette: Today we have the privilege of speaking with Angela Duckworth about her bestselling book and research. Welcome, Angela. Thank you so much for being with us. Angela: Thank you for having me. Annette: So to start with, can you provide a brief explanation of your research and then also how do you define grit? Angela:I am someone who came to her research from classroom teaching. I was a middle school and high school math teacher for several years in public schools and I was frustrated that I wasn’t at all able to motivate my students to put in the effort that I knew was required to learn the material and to get better at math. And I think the research that I do today is very much motivated by the question, “What is the psychology of effort? Why do some kids keep trying when they’re frustrated or they get a problem wrong and why do other kids give up?” And relatedly, “Why do kids, sometimes, get all their homework done and then sometimes end up spending the whole night on social media?” So effort in the face of obstacles, effort in the face of tempting distractions. I would call these the psychology of grit and self control. But really I’m trying to unpack effort so that we can do better than I did as a teacher, which is I would just tell my kids, “Oh, you should work harder.” And honestly that was not the most insightful thing to say and it didn’t help very much. Annette:So in your book you talk about the importance of interest discovery and you go on to explain that children have a greater likelihood of thriving in their interests with a strong support system of parents, teachers, coaches, peers. So regarding the interest discovery process, you give advice that play comes before hard work. In the public education system, how do you think teachers and parents can help children discover their interests while also meeting the parameters of established curriculum? Angela:I’ll begin by saying that I think interest is essential to the human motivation. I mean, any of us who understand what it’s like to be bored, sitting in a lecture or having to do something you really, really, really don’t want to do. And we all know what it’s like to not be at our best because we’re not engaged. I don’t mean to imply that kids should be having fun all the time. I mean, it would be naive for me to say that kids will always be intrinsically motivated at all times of day and that nothing will ever require a little bit of self control or work ethic. But in terms of what kids grow up to be, in terms of their careers, in terms of their college majors, I think it’s so important that throughout their K-12 experience, we’ve planted the seeds so that they can find a career that is intrinsically enjoyable, much of the day, if not all of the day. Angela:And my own perspective on this is that, as some kids will be very fortunate in that they will discover those interests in French class, in algebra, in English language arts and things that are part of the traditional academic curriculum. But I think one of the most common ways to develop your interest is outside of the academic classes, so extracurricular activities. Many people discover and develop an interest in leadership and team building through sports or maybe your interest in writing is actually something which is peaked more by working on the school newspaper and the assignments that you’re doing for language arts class. So I think in general, the American school system and most other school systems, frankly, we have a long way to go before we can say, “Hey, we’re optimally set up to help all students discover and develop their interests.” Annette:So in this country at least, we expect students to think about and sort of decide upon a potential career path around the age of 17 or 18, as they are graduating from high school. This is obviously a young age and also a time of uncertainty. So what advice would you give to young adults who feel they don’t have direction at this stage of life? They don’t know what they want to pursue or how to reach even the end goal. Angela:This is such a great question. In fact, it’s the question that’s occupying me centrally as a scientist today. What advice do we have based on science for how to navigate those waters? And I spent, I guess a good decade between graduating from college to figuring out I wanted to become a psychologist. And if you add the four years that I was in college also not knowing what I would eventually end up doing. Well, that’s 14 years of not knowing. Annette:Yeah. Absolutely. Angela:And I think my first message would be empathy. I mean, I really, really feel for the young people who are already hard workers and they’re resilient but they don’t necessarily know what they’re working for. And I personally found it kind of a torturous, angst-ridden, uncomfortable stage of life. I cried a lot, I got very pessimistic at times that I would ever find my way. In terms of ways that you can shorten that period of wandering from hopefully not 14 years to something a little shorter, I think the thing that students need to do is try stuff out. I sometimes tell my own students, I tell them that interests are like foods, you don’t really know if you’ll like it or not until you actually experience it. I mean, I can tell you what the durian fruit tastes like, but unless you taste it, you won’t know. Angela:And that means that you have to get out of your head and get out of the classroom and really try things. I mean, if you think you might want to be a veterinarian, figure out a way to spend an afternoon shadowing a veterinarian. I mean, you’ll know much more at the end of that afternoon than you did before, and I think likewise, in having conversations with people who are doing things that are related to what you think you might want to do, the closer you can get to actual experience, I think the better. And if I had spent more time experimenting, trying out different careers when I was in high school and during my college years, I think I might’ve come to the same decision, but I think I would’ve come to it sooner and that really honestly would have been better for me. Annette:Yeah. The concept of deliberate practice is prevalent in your book. Can you tell us what that is? Talk to us about deliberate practice and then also about learning from mistakes and kind of encouraging learning from mistakes and how that can help students discover their passion. Angela:There is a literature in science on experts, so Olympic athletes and virtuoso musicians, and Nobel prize winning scientists. And the question that’s asked in this scientific research is, “What makes these experts different from the rest of us?” One very important difference is the way they practice, and the way they practice is often called deliberate practice. And it has a few features that as I rattle them off, you can think of how students often spend their time doing homework or studying, and you can see the contrast. Angela:So one feature of deliberate practice is that there’s a very specific learning goal in mind at the beginning of practice. And you might say, “Well, students get assigned homework and that’s the learning goal.” But as a math teacher, if I assign, “Do the problems on page 372, the evens.” That is not a learning goal. That’s just, “Oh, I have to do that.” But maybe the learning goal is to really master converting fractions to decimals, right? That’s the learning goal. So I think that when we assign homework or we ask students to do projects in school, we should make sure that they can say back to us, “What’s the learning goal? What’s the point of this thing I’m about to do?” And if you do that, you’re practicing a little bit more like an expert. Angela:The second thing that experts do is they practice with full concentration, so they’re not multitasking. And I have two daughters at home, they are proud students of the Philadelphia Public School. They’re learning better and better, I think, how to study without distractions. When I would come home when they were in younger grades, and they’re junior or senior now, but earlier in their academic careers, I’d come home, there’d be music playing and they’re texting and they’re Snapchatting but also somehow doing their homework. That’s the opposite of the way experts practice. Angela:So the second recommendation is to help students understand that the psychology of attention is that you cannot divide it without real compromise to your learning. And the final element I’ll just say it’s so important, I think we could do a better job of as educators, and I include myself here, is that as educators, teachers, we can do a better job providing feedback. So deliberate practice has the feature of usually immediate feedback that’s very clear so that the learner can immediately implement changes and get at it again. And when I think of how long it took me to give back quizzes and tests, or to grade homework or you can think of other subjects, how long does it take for a student to get their writing back? If they’re getting feedback, the longer the cycle time and the less specific that feedback, the less we are approximating deliberate practice, the practice of world class experts. Annette:Well that’s interesting because I have heard even my own daughter say, “Oh, this teacher returns feedback very quickly, or this one I have to wait a little bit for.” So that’s interesting but that makes a ton of sense. In chapter nine, ‘Hope’, you stress the importance of a growth mindset and especially for students who are coming from a disadvantaged background. How important do you think a growth mindset is to overcoming adversity? Angela:A growth mindset is a belief that abilities can change, and it has been studied mostly with the idea that your intelligence can change. I’m sure students can tell you that intelligence isn’t the only ability they care about. They might care about their athletic ability or their musical ability or their leadership ability. But I do think that when you are a student and you’re 7, 8, 9, you’re 15, you’re 16, a lot of your time you’re wondering how smart you are. And so this research from Carol Dweck at Stanford showing that the belief that intelligence can change, that it’s not fixed is so important. I think it’s important for kids, I think it’s important for adults. I think many of us walk around and have a fixed mindset about how smart we are and that discourages us from trying new things that are going to require failure. And that is because we don’t want to look dumb, right? Annette:Mm-hmm (affirmative). Angela:If intelligence can’t be changed, God forbid we don’t have enough of it. So I think of it as something that’s required in life no matter how old you are. And also honestly, no matter what your socio-economic background is as well. Though we might say one group of kids we especially worry about or another group, we should emphasize this more, but it’s a universal. And in my research with Carol, we have found, in data that we collect on adolescents, that students who have more of a growth mindset are the ones who are more resilient and harder working. And we follow students over time, this is actually new data that I’ve collected recently, and you can see this virtuous cycle where students who have a growth mindset, and then you come back then you see like, “What are they doing?” Well, those are the students who are working hard, but if you come back a third time, it’s the students who are working hard to increase in their growth mindset and so on and so forth. So I think it’s a virtuous cycle to begin, hopefully as early as possible, in schooling. Annette:Are there some specific ways that parents and teachers can help students develop this mindset? Angela:One very surprising finding in terms of this growth mindset, a literature came from a student who was a postdoctoral fellow with me, her name is Kyla Haimovitz. She did her PhD with Carol at Stanford, and her hypothesis was really straight forward, which is that if you have a teacher or a parent who has a growth mindset, then you’ll automatically have a student or a kid who has a growth mindset as well. And that made all the sense in the world, where else would their beliefs come from? They must come directly from their parents’ and their teachers’ beliefs. But she found that in many of her datasets, there was no relationship. And after many more years digging and collecting more data, what she discovered is that the teachers’ mindsets matter and the parents’ mindsets matter, but it’s a little more directly about how the parents and the teachers behave around failure. Angela:It’s all well and good and we should hope that teachers and parents believe that all these can change, but maybe even more relevant to how students grow up and what they think of themselves is how you respond when a student gets a problem wrong or you’re doing a class discussion, a problem on the board maybe, and the student can’t produce the right answer, they get a bad grade, right? Annette:Mm-hmm (affirmative). Angela:The semester didn’t go well. What is the body language that we use? What are the words that come out of our mouths? How do we signal to students that failure is part of learning and not diagnostic, that they’re unable to do something in the future. And I think that this message is very clear then for teachers and parents and that is that every time a child fails is an opportunity to strengthen their growth mindset by modeling for them and being very clear that failure is, sometimes, even a good sign, right? Because it means you tried to do something that you can’t yet do, which means that you are challenging yourself and that there is information there that we can all use so that the next opportunity maybe we could do a little better. Annette:I think what you said is just such a strong message and it goes back to even what we were talking about with learning from mistakes and how that is a necessary part of growth. Angela:Exactly. And it’s something that in news research, I mean new, it’s being published in 2020, even 2019, the psychology of mistake making is so inter…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Purple Dreams: Portraying the Power of an Arts Education Feb 18, 2020
    Show notes
    • About this Episode
    • Time Stamps
    • About our Guests
    During the 2019 PASA-PSBA School Leadership Conference, we sat down with keynote speakers Corey Mitchell and Robin Grey to discuss their film Purple Dreams. The duo discusses their experience advocating for arts education, the impact it has had on students they’ve mentored and their journey to creating the film. Skip to: 1:47 Arts education can help students develop skills in collaboration, creativity and confidence, but students don’t always have access to these programs. Purple Dreams made strides in showing what impact these programs can have on students. How do you think awareness can be raised around the importance of arts education?

    “It’s unfortunate that the arts aren’t measurable by a standardized test. It’s just one of those things that is still important to almost everyone’s experience when they were in grade school, middle school and high school.” -Corey Mitchell

    Skip to: 6:40 How has Purple Dreams been received by audiences?

    “I think that we need to make people aware of the great things that they can perceive and see in children as they process in their arts education.” -Robin Grey

    Skip to: 10:39 How do you think educators and parents can expose their students to arts education?
    Skip to: 13:23 Have you experienced skepticism from some students about getting involved in the arts?

    “There is responsibility that we have to our students as schools across this country to also help to develop them into being well-rounded human beings and that’s not always found directly on the pages of a book, it is an experience for them.” – Corey Mitchell

    “Arts do make a whole rounded person and that it has many other positive effects that have been shown to then be catalyst to the students doing better in school.” -Robin Grey

    Skip to: 17:19 Do you think arts education can have a more profound impact on at-risk children?

    “The highest dropout rates are in underserved areas that don’t have arts programs.” -Robin Grey

    “Arts education keeps kids in school. When we talk about at risk, my thought about at risk is at risk of dropping out and we have to prevent kids from dropping out of school. When we bring in arts education, their reason for dropping out disappears.” -Robin Grey

    Skip to: 21:45 Corey, has your previous experience teaching a core subject influenced how you teach theater? If so, why?

    “So much of what theater is, is language and expression and understanding those literary concepts of satire, irony and all of those things.” -Corey Mitchell

    “When you’re looking at the school where your child goes, create and advocate for that urgency of what it means to have my child singing and dancing and expressing themselves.” -Corey Mitchell

    Robin Grey

    Robin Grey is the chief executive officer of Arts Empowers, a nonprofit advocating for meaningful arts education in public schools, especially for at-risk youth. She is the executive producer of the award-winning documentary Purple Dreams*. The award-winning film is evidence of the transformational power of an arts education. Grey’s passion to serve the underserved has informed both her professional career and personal achievements. Among other roles, she served as vice chairman of The Arts Empowerment Project during its founding four years – a nonprofit that connects at-risk children to Charlotte-area arts programs.

    Corey Mitchell

    Director, performer and teacher Corey Mitchell is the recipient of the 2015 inaugural Excellence in Theatre Education Tony Award and was one of the top 50 finalists for the 2017 Global Teacher Prize. Mitchell and his students in the Northwest School of the Arts in Charlotte, NC, are the subject of the 2017 feature-length documentary Purple Dreams, which chronicles their production of The Color Purple and its journey to the main stage of the International Thespian Festival. Mitchell has 24 years in the classroom and has just completed his 18th year at Northwest, where he teaches acting and leads a dynamic musical theatre program.

    The post Purple Dreams: Portraying the Power of an Arts Education appeared first on Keystone Education Radio.


    A Seat At The Table: Encouraging Student Voice Feb 04, 2020
    Show notes
    • About this Episode
    • Time Stamps
    • About our Guests
    • Resources
    In this episode, Asia Mason, project manager of student voice with the Pittsburgh Public School District (PPS); Sam Bisno, a senior at the Barack Obama Academy of International Studies, also known as Pittsburgh Obama 6 – 12 and Prishti Tyagi, a sophomore at Pittsburgh Science and Technology Academy, discuss how their district and local community are not only permitting but prioritizing student voice in decision-making.
    This episode is sponsored by Questeq and Siemens Industry, Inc. Skip to: 02:56 Explanation of Project Manager of Student Voice for PPS’s role
    Skip to: 04:19 Brief overview of the Pittsburgh Public Schools Student and Government Council
    Skip to: 05:55 What are a few of the important messages that students have communicated with the district, city and state leadership since the organization was adopted?
    Skip to: 06:48 As a student in the school, how have you been able to get your peers interested in the impact they can make on the local government?

    There’s a real passion and drive among us students to get involved as early as we can.

    I’ve found that once students learn about opportunities like this, they jump to apply because they really do want to effect change.

    Skip to: 09:34 How is the interaction and communication between students from private, parochial and charter schools fostered a more connected district?

    So when we’re bringing students together, it creates an opportunity that doesn’t organically happen in the city.

    Skip to: 12:52 What was the motivation for starting the Student Advisory Council?
    Skip to: 14:19 What has the organization’s biggest accomplishment been during this time?
    Skip to: 15:35 What are the objectives of the PPS Student Advisory Council?
    Skip to: 18:29 From a student perspective, why is it important to you to have a voice in your school’s leadership?
    Skip to: 19:17 What age groups are represented in these organizations?
    Skip to: 20:37 What advice would you give to other school districts looking to establish a student voice group?

    Students have continued to show that they’re ready, they’re hungry for these opportunities. And their feedback and strategies, especially when they are a part of the change, that’s where meaningful change happens in education.

    Asia Mason, Project Manager, Student Voice at Pittsburgh Public Schools

    Asia Mason currently serves as the Project Manager, Student Voice in the Office of the Superintendent at Pittsburgh Public Schools. In her current role, she manages district-wide student voice and student leadership opportunities in 14 schools. This work consists of managing the 85-member Superintendent’s Student Advisory Council, 25 member PPS Youth Participatory Budget Council (a partnership with City Council) and ensuring that student feedback directly impacts the decisions that are made systematically.

    A product of the Pittsburgh Public School system, Asia graduated from Pittsburgh CAPA in 2008. Spending a year at Temple University, Asia continued her post-secondary education at CCAC, earning an associate degree in Liberal Arts & Sciences, then transferred to Carlow University where she earned her B.A. in Psychology Counseling and MBA in Project Management. She is currently enrolled at Edinboro University, where she is studying for her Pre-K-12 Principal Certification. Always having a passion for youth and education, Asia began working with children in the Out-of-School Time setting at Allegheny Center Alliance Church. It was through these various experiences that allowed Asia to transform her leadership perspective.

    Prishti Tyagi, 10th grade, Pittsburgh Science and Technology Academy

    Prishti Tyagi is a sophomore attending Pittsburgh Science and Technology Academy, where she is in the Body & Behavior Concentration. She is currently in Stand Together, USO Swimming, Girls of Steel, and the Superintendent’s Student Advisory Council. Her love of leadership and making a difference led her to the Council. She hopes to attend Stanford University, majoring in neuroscience and minoring in psychology.

    Sam Bisno, 12th grade, Pittsburgh Barack Obama Academy of International Studies 6-12

    Sam Bisno is a senior at Obama Academy. Last year, as a member of the PPS Youth Participatory Budget Council, he helped draft a proposal for City Council that aimed to address growing gentrification in Pittsburgh by investing in community land trusts. This year, he is looking forward to taking a more school-oriented approach to bettering his city through his work on the Superintendent’s Student Advisory Council. Sam is the Editor-in-Chief of his school newspaper and, in April 2019, was elected Youth Governor of Pennsylvania. He hopes to study history at a liberal arts university after graduating.

    • PPS Students & Government Council Brochure
    • Student Advisory Council Brochure
    • PPS Student Voice on Facebook
    • PPS Student Voice on Twitter
    • www.pghschools.org/studentvoice

    The post A Seat At The Table: Encouraging Student Voice appeared first on Keystone Education Radio.


    Different, Not Deficient Jan 21, 2020
    Show notes
    • About this Episode
    • Time Stamps
    • About our Guest
    • Resources
    In this episode of Keystone Education Radio, author and advocate Jonathan Mooney discusses his book Normal Sucks, his journey of growing up with a learning difference and how these experiences shaped the work he is doing today.

    Skip to: 01:42 Dyslexia is a learning difference that can present itself in different ways — difficultly reading, spelling, completing math problems — could you explain how you exhibited dyslexia?

    What I struggled with most was not the specific academic limitations, those were very real challenges, what I struggled with was the way that I was made to feel stupid and less than because I did not have the so-called ‘normal’ brain.

    Skip to: 04:05 In your book, you share the varying views on differences not being deficiencies, but strengths. Can you summarize for our listeners what you’ve witnessed about the gifts and talents of students with differences?

    Young people with a-typical brains and bodies are valuable to the world, not despite their differences, but because of them.

    There are strengths and talents that come hand in hand with limitations — because of limitations

    About 50% of small businesses in America are run by or founded by somebody with a neurological difference.

    Skip to: 07:29 Why do you think it’s so important for children with learning differences to have someone advocating for them? How did having these individuals advocating for you impact your education and career?
    Skip to: 10:23 How were you able to overcome the trauma of the events in your childhood while also dealing with other challenges at school?

    So I’m on a mission to help us elevate the learning experience for some kids; not all, but for some, and see it through the lens of either trauma or empowerment.

    So many people with a-typical brains and bodies get the message that they are less than as humans because of their ability status and that leads to folks losing hope for themselves.

    Skip to: 13:39 At Brown University, there are no core requirements. Education is based on the individual student. How do you think this model promotes success, and how do you think that this could be mirrored in public education?

    When we focus on experiential learning, when we focus on project based learning, when we focus on nurturing and validating individual interest and talent, young folks who historically are challenged do better.

    Skip to: 16:52 At the end of your book, you recall a paragraph from The Rejected Body that states, “People with disabilities have experiences, by virtue of their disabilities, which non-disabled people do not have, and which are sources of knowledge that is not directly accessible to non-disabled people.” How do you believe this thinking should or could be incorporated into public education?
    Skip to: 21:55 What advice would you give to students and parents?

    Different isn’t deficient.

    Jonathan Mooney, Author

    Jonathan Mooney is an award winning writer, entrepreneur, and activist who did not learn to read until he was twelve years old.

    He holds an honors degree from Brown University, is a Harry S. Truman Scholar for Public Service (California, 1999), and was a finalist for a Rhodes scholarship. With the publication of Learning Outside The Lines (now in its 28th printing) when he was 23, Jonathan has established himself as one of the foremost leaders in the nurodiversty and the learning revolution. His second book, The Short Bus: A Journey Beyond Normal was published in the spring of 2007 to outstanding reviews in The New York Times Book Review, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago Tribune and many other national publications. Both books are considered foundational texts in the disability rights movement, the inclusive education movement, and the learning revolution and are used in under-graduate and graduate program at universities and colleges across the country including Harvard’s Graduate School of Education and Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Jonathan’s work has been widely recognized for its innovation and social impact and. In 1999, Jonathan was selected as a Harry S. Truman Scholar for Public Service Truman scholar for public service; in 2000 Jonathan was selected as a finalist for the Rhoads scholarship; and In 2008 Jonathan’s social impact work was recognized by the Lab School of Washington where he shared the stage with the Vice President of the United States, Joseph Biden.

    “At Risk in the Culture of ‘Normal’” by Jonathan Mooney, NY Times
    Jonathan Mooney’s Website
    Books by Jonathan Mooney

    Normal Sucks
    The Short Bus: A Journey Beyond Normal
    Learning Outside The Lines

    The post Different, Not Deficient appeared first on Keystone Education Radio.


    Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 11 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights