TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Health & Fitness

    Joy Lab | strengthen your mental health with the science of joy

    Joy Lab isn’t your typical happiness podcast. We focus on strengthening your mental health with the science of joy, recognizing that joy can be tapped into even amidst experiences like depression, anxiety, stress, grief, and burnout. You can expect a blend of the best cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques, positive psychology practices, stress management techniques, and mindfulness skills. Each month we focus on building one Element of Joy such as gratitude, self-compassion, confidence, self-acceptance, humility, and self-connection. It’s a holistic approach to mental health that’s refreshingly free of finger-wagging and toxic positivity and full of practical, whole-person support that’s empowering and actually helps. Joy Lab is hosted by two leaders in mental health, Henry Emmons, MD (integrative psychiatrist) and Aimee Prasek, PhD (mental health researcher).

    You’ll probably find this podcast most useful if any of these feel familiar:

    * You feel caught in cycles of worry, anxiety, or panic attacks.

    * Stress has settled into your body, with tension, fatigue, and irritation showing up too often.

    * The news of the world is getting under your skin, affecting your mood and focus more than you’d like to admit.

    * Day-to-day life feels too “meh” and you want something more.

    * Your mind feels full, foggy, or restless… maybe at 3am, when it seems especially determined to revisit everything you can’t solve.

    * You’ve been in a low mood or depression rut for a while and you want tools to move through it.

    * Burnout has left you exhausted, detached, or running on empty.

    New episodes drop every Wednesday + the 1st of each month. Each episode is a practical guide to managing depression and anxiety, building resilience, cultivating joy, and navigating life with more steadiness. It’s an empowering approach that isn’t just focused on what’s wrong or endlessly chasing after fleeting moments of happiness.

    Henry and Aimee bring 50+ combined years of mental health expertise, along with the lived experience to know that “not so bad” is not the end goal for mental health. Joy Lab is here to help you reclaim the resilience and joy that’s already within you.

    Joy Lab is an Ambie-nominated, trusted mental health resource and is powered by Pathways North, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

    This content is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Consult your doctor or a qualified health professional before making changes to your health routine. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call or text 988 (SAMHSA) or contact the NAMI HelpLine at 1-800-950-6264 (Mon–Fri, 10am–10pm ET), text “HelpLine” to 62640, or email helpline@nami.org.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2021-2022

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Being Hard on Yourself Doesn't Keep You Motivated: Here's the Science of Self-Compassion [295] Nov 04, 2026
    Show notes

    Self-compassion isn't easy... most of us are harder on ourselves than we are on anyone else. On top of that, we often don't even realize how self-critical, self-judgmental, or harsh we are. In this episode, we'll get into what self-compassion actually is, how it can help us, and why the myth that self-criticism is motivating can actually harm our mental health.

    Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here.

    Related Episodes:

    • Start of this series: Our New Element of Self-Compassion: What It Is, Why It Matters, & What's Coming [ep. 294]

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North.

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: What is self-compassion, and how is it different from self-esteem or self-acceptance?

    A: This episode uses Dr. Kristin Neff's definition: being supportive toward yourself when experiencing suffering or pain, whether from personal mistakes or external challenges. We also like to think of self-compassion as being a friend to yourself. Self-compassion also builds on concepts like self-acceptance and enoughness (we have lots of episodes on those concepts too).

    Q: Isn't being hard on yourself what keeps you motivated? Won't self-compassion just make me lazy?

    A: Self-criticism can trigger a short-term stress response that gets you to take a quick action, but behavior change is an endurance game, and stress is not good endurance fuel. More impactful drivers of sustainable change are anchored in self-worth, self-efficacy, self-awareness, and self-compassion. That's why we focus on these kinds of strength-building Elements at Joy Lab.

    Key moments:

    [00:00] Welcome to the Self-Compassion Element

    [02:00] ~80% of people are harder on themselves than others

    [04:00] Dr. Kristin Neff's definition of self-compassion

    [06:00] Self-compassion as friendship

    [08:00] What self-compassion does in the body and brain

    [10:00] Self-criticism is not sustainable fuel for behavior change

    [14:00] Stress as addiction

    [18:00] Neff's three components preview — mindfulness, self-kindness, common humanity

    [19:00] Closing wisdom from Dr. Christopher Germer: "A moment of self-compassion can change your entire day. A string of such moments can change the course of your life."

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Self-Compassion:

    • Breines, J. G., & Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212445599
    • Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138
    • Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Pose, P. M. (2026). Perfectionism is accelerating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analytic review of 35 years of college student data. Psychological Bulletin, 152(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000518
    • Germer, C. K. (2009). The mindful path to self-compassion: Freeing yourself from destructive thoughts and emotions. Guilford Press.
    • Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life's challenges. Constable & Robinson.
    • Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12043
    • Loftus, E. F., & Pickrell, J. E. (1995). The Formation of False Memories. Psychiatric Annals, 25(12), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-19951201-07
    • Neff, K. (2023). Self-compassion: Theory, method, research, and intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031047
    • Neff, K. (2021). Fierce self-compassion: How women can harness kindness to speak up, claim their power, and thrive. Harper Wave.
    • Neff, K. (2011). Self-compassion: The proven power of being kind to yourself. William Morrow.
    • Sirois, F. M. (2014). Procrastination and stress: Exploring the role of self-compassion. Self and Identity, 13(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2013.763404
    • Stevenson, B. (2014). Just mercy: A story of justice and redemption. Spiegel & Grau.
    • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
    • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
    • Wade, K. A., Garry, M., Read, J. D., & Lindsay, D. S. (2002). A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196318
    • Woods, H., & Proeve, M. (2014). Relationships of mindfulness, self-compassion, and meditation experience with shame-proneness. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.28.1.20

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    Our New Element of Self-Compassion: What It Is, Why It Matters, & What's Coming [294] Nov 01, 2026
    Show notes

    Self-compassion is one of our most powerful tools to support mental health. The problem is that a lot of us are real jerks to ourselves... and most of the time, we don't even notice we're doing it. Over the next four episodes, we'll talk about the power of self-compassion, bust the myth that being hard on yourself is what keeps you motivated, explore how to reduce the suffering we pile on top of life's hard stuff, and dig into the common humanity of suffering.

    Before we dive in to all that next episode, please consider supporting this important work. Rate and review the pod wherever you're listening, share Joy Lab with a friend, and join us for our Experiments.

    Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here.

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is a Signal Gold Award winner and an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you build your mental health strengths. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North.

    Full transcript here

    Key moments:

    [00:00] New Element: Self-Compassion

    [02:00] Why Joy Lab stays ad-free and how community support keeps it going

    [04:00] What's ahead in the Self-Compassion Series

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    When the Need to Control Controls You: How to Break the Cycle, Reclaim Agency, & Find What's Yours to Do [293] Oct 28, 2026
    Show notes

    We're wired to seek control, but that drive often misfires, leaving us more anxious and exhausted than before. In this episode, we dig into the illusion of control and the much more useful concept of identifying things like agency and autonomy. We'll dive into the obstacles and key strategies to redirect energy away from what we can't control and toward what's actually ours to do.

    Head to the Experiment to practice this shift — and find a little more of what Thich Nhat Hanh calls the only condition for happiness: freedom.

    Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here.

    Related Episodes:

    • This series:
      • E289- What Are You Holding On To? The Science & Skill of Letting Go
      • E290- Letting Go of Intrusive Thoughts & Rumination: The Pink Elephant Paradox, The Whac-A-Mole Problem, & Skills That Actually Help
      • E291- Letting Go of the Stories You Tell Yourself: Is It True? Is It Helpful? Is It Kind?
      • E292- Letting Go of the Need for Closure: Why Life's Biggest Problems Can Only Be Outgrown

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North.

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: Why do I feel such a strong need to control everything, even when I know I can't?

    A: This episode explains the brain science behind it: our brains are prediction machines wired to seek control as a survival strategy, and that drive can misfire in modern life. There are a lot of low-level stressors we face on a daily basis. If we are trying to "fix" them all, we can get stuck in a cycle that can turn into anxiety, rigidity, and exhaustion.

    Q: How do I let go of control without feeling helpless or irresponsible?

    A: This episode draws a key distinction between control (an illusion) and agency (real influence over your own actions, choices, and responses). We can work to identify the situation more accurately and then ask "what's mine to do?" or "what depends on me?" These questions can determine where to put your energy and where you can loosen your grip.

    Full transcript

    Key moments:

    [00:00] Welcome — letting go of control

    [02:00] The illusion of control

    [06:00] Why we're wired for control & how it can backfire into things like anxiety, rigidity

    [08:00] Agency vs. control

    [10:00] Practicing letting go with the small stuff

    [12:00] The control spectrum

    [16:00] What's within our power vs. what isn't. "What is dependent on me?" Epictetus, Stephen Covey

    [20:00] Control is an illusion; autonomy is real. "What's mine to do?"

    [22:00] Loosening the grip of control frees us from unfair burdens

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Letting Go:

    • Alloy & Abramson. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441
    • Botvinick & Cohen. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. doi.org/10.1038/35784
    • Clark & Radomsky (2014). Introduction: A global perspective on unwanted intrusive thoughts. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.001
    • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
    • de Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. Doubleday.
    • Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, fragments, handbook (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
    • Feldman, et al. (2023). Interoceptive ability moderates the effect of physiological reactivity on social judgment. 10.1037/emo0001210

    • Freud, S. (1957). Mourning and melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917)
    • Gottlieb, L. (2019). Maybe you should talk to someone: A therapist, her therapist, and our lives revealed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    • Jung, C. G. (1962). Commentary. In R. Wilhelm (Trans.), The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of life (C. F. Baynes, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1929)
    • Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis.
    • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.
    • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
    • Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise. Ballantine Books.

    • Luo, M. (2004, February 27). For exercise in New York futility, push button. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html
    • MacCormack & Lindquis (2019). Feeling hangry? When hunger is conceptualized as emotion. 10.1037/emo0000422

    • Mauss, et al. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. doi.org/10.1037/a0022010
    • Morewedge, et al. (2010). Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.010

    • Moulding, et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006

    • Nhat Hanh, T. (1998). Fragrant palm leaves: Journals, 1962–1966. Parallax Press.
    • Palmer, P. J. (2016, April 27). The gift of presence, the perils of advice. The On Being Project. https://onbeing.org/blog/the-gift-of-presence-the-perils-of-advice/
    • Paumgarten, N. (2008, April 21). Up and then down: The lives of elevators. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/04/21/up-and-then-down
    • Rachman, S. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90007-2

    • Radomsky, et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002

    • Siegel, et al. (2018). Seeing what you feel: Affect drives visual perception of structurally neutral faces. 10.1177/0956797617741718

    • Singer, M. A. (2007). The untethered soul: The journey beyond yourself. New Harbinger Publications.
    • Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. 10.1126/science.1229294
    • Wegner, et al. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5

    • Wilson & Gilbert. 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    Letting Go of the Need for Closure: Why Life's Biggest Problems Can Only Be Outgrown [292] Oct 21, 2026
    Show notes

    Closure often feels like it should be the goal when we're dealing with grief or going through a tough time. But what if closure is actually a myth and the pressure to "get over it," "fix it," or emerge as a better version of ourselves is doing more harm than good? In this episode, we dig into the myth of closure: the mistaken belief that complex losses and life problems should be processed into some kind of clean, final resolution. We explore why closure is appealing but often not possible, what Carl Jung and Pauline Boss say about insoluble problems and ambiguous loss, and what it actually means to find healing and growth without closure.

    Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here.

    Related Episodes:

    • Start of our Grief Series. ep. 248: Grief, Growth & The Wholeness of Being Human (Grief Recovery & Healing Series part 1)

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North.

    Full transcript here

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: Is closure real? Can you ever really "get over" a significant loss?

    A: This episode explores why closure is more myth than reality for life's most significant losses, and why that's not a failure. Carl Jung argued that the most important problems in life are insoluble: they can't be solved, only outgrown; and Pauline Boss's work on ambiguous loss shows that some losses, by nature, never come to a clear resolution. And that's okay.

    Q: What should I reach for instead of closure after a loss?

    A: This episode discusses approaches like "continuing bonds," the idea that maintaining an evolving inner connection with what or who we've lost can be healthy and adaptive. The goal then is not closure but growth around the loss, holding both the love and the pain.

    Key moments:

    [00:00] The myth of closure

    [02:00] The myth of closure and perfection

    [04:00] How Kubler-Ross's stages of grief got distorted and Freud's decathexis

    [08:00] A drive for closure can lead us to avoid what is true

    [10:00] Carl Jung on insoluble problems

    [12:00] Holding opposites: making the best decision possible without actually solving the problem

    [14:00] The difference between closure and completion

    [16:00] The first law of thermodynamics applies to grief too

    [18:00] Continuing bonds theory (Klass, Silverman, Nickman)

    [20:00] Internalized vs. externalized bonds

    [22:00] Example with Alzheimer's diagnosis, the relentless nature of grief without closure

    [24:00] Pauline Boss and ambiguous loss:

    [26:00] Both/and thinking

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Letting Go:

    • Alloy & Abramson. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441
    • Botvinick & Cohen. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. doi.org/10.1038/35784
    • Clark & Radomsky (2014). Introduction: A global perspective on unwanted intrusive thoughts. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.001
    • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
    • de Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. Doubleday.
    • Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, fragments, handbook (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
    • Feldman, et al. (2023). Interoceptive ability moderates the effect of physiological reactivity on social judgment. 10.1037/emo0001210

    • Freud, S. (1957). Mourning and melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917)
    • Gottlieb, L. (2019). Maybe you should talk to someone: A therapist, her therapist, and our lives revealed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    • Jung, C. G. (1962). Commentary. In R. Wilhelm (Trans.), The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of life (C. F. Baynes, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1929)
    • Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis.
    • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.
    • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
    • Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise. Ballantine Books.

    • Luo, M. (2004, February 27). For exercise in New York futility, push button. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html
    • MacCormack & Lindquis (2019). Feeling hangry? When hunger is conceptualized as emotion. 10.1037/emo0000422

    • Mauss, et al. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. doi.org/10.1037/a0022010
    • Morewedge, et al. (2010). Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.010

    • Moulding, et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006

    • Nhat Hanh, T. (1998). Fragrant palm leaves: Journals, 1962–1966. Parallax Press.
    • Palmer, P. J. (2016, April 27). The gift of presence, the perils of advice. The On Being Project. https://onbeing.org/blog/the-gift-of-presence-the-perils-of-advice/
    • Paumgarten, N. (2008, April 21). Up and then down: The lives of elevators. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/04/21/up-and-then-down
    • Rachman, S. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90007-2

    • Radomsky, et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002

    • Siegel, et al. (2018). Seeing what you feel: Affect drives visual perception of structurally neutral faces. 10.1177/0956797617741718

    • Singer, M. A. (2007). The untethered soul: The journey beyond yourself. New Harbinger Publications.
    • Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. 10.1126/science.1229294
    • Wegner, et al. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5

    • Wilson & Gilbert. 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    Letting Go of the Stories You Tell Yourself: Is It True? Is It Helpful? Is It Kind? [291] Oct 14, 2026
    Show notes

    It's great that us humans are storytellers... except when we tell rigid, oversimplified stories about who we are, what happened to us, and what's possible next. The solution is not to get rid of our stories as they can help us make sense of a complex world, build identity, and find some control in chaos. One strategy to loosen up on our stories is to do some editing to them. We can ask a story that might be holding us three questions: Is it true? (Memory is like a Wikipedia page, not a replayable video — constantly re-edited by mood, depression, and anxiety.) Is it helpful? (We're terrible predictors of our future selves and tend to overestimate how much one event defines us.) Is it kind? (Unkind stories activate the stress response and can shut down possibility; self-compassion is the condition that makes change possible.) In this episode, we'll dig into how we can identify our stories, ask some questions of them, and make some honest edits so our stories can become tools for growth and possibility. Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here. Referenced books (more sources below): Two Islands & A Boat (narrative therapy resource) Related Episodes: Start of our Grief Series. ep. 248: Grief, Growth & The Wholeness of Being Human (Grief Recovery & Healing Series part 1) About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek. Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North. Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app: Spotify | Apple | YouTube Questions this episode was made for: Q: How do I let go of a story about myself that I've been telling for years — especially when it feels completely true? A: This episode offers three practical questions to ask any story you're holding: is it true, is it helpful, and is it kind. These questions can help us edit our stories so they are more honest and enable growth. Q: Does letting go of my stories mean I have to pretend the bad things didn't happen or turn them into something positive? A: No! That's toxic positivity and it sucks our joy. Letting go of stories is not about denial, toxic positivity, or crafting a phoenix-rising narrative; it's about loosening the tight grip so the story doesn't have unearned power over what's possible. Full transcript Key moments: [00:00] Welcome — Letting go of our stories [01:00] What letting go of stories is NOT: ignoring the past, rejecting what happened, abandoning truth that keeps us safe or gives direction [02:30] Creating stories about ourselves helps us make sense of the world, form identity, find belonging, feel some control in chaos [03:00] The problem isn't that we make up stories — it's that we believe them; seeing a story as a story lets us keep the good without letting it dictate our lives [03:30] Narrative therapy: clarifying, challenging, recrafting stories; book recommendations and practitioner note in show notes [04:30] The kettlebell metaphor: stories are like light kettlebells — easy to pick up, helpful to swing around, but they get heavy with time and take resources to hold [05:30] When arms are free and open: more open to love, growth, success — and also rejection, failure, sorrow; that's why we grip; uncertainty takes skill [06:00] Thich Nhat Hanh: "People have a hard time letting go of their suffering. Out of a fear of the unknown, they prefer suffering that is familiar." — substitute suffering with stories [07:30] There can be real grief in letting go of a story — even the best decision can come with loss; link to Grief Series in show notes [08:00] But when you let go, you create space for something new — it might take a while to arrive, but at least it's possible [08:30] Even our thriving main-character stories can hold us back in unhelpful ways [09:00] Three questions to ask of any story: Is it true? Is it helpful? Is it kind? [10:00] Our brain crafts simple stories to explain complex situations — comforting, but rarely fully true for complex human lives [10:30] We retell stories until they feel more true; memory is not a replayable video — Dr. Elizabeth Loftus: memory is more like a Wikipedia page [11:00] Memory gets re-edited by many people and experiences, not just us — similar to how perception is influenced by so many things [11:30] When experiencing depression or anxiety, our perspective narrows — the stories and edits we make during those times reflect that narrowed view [12:00] Asking "is it true?" lets us examine the edits and the context in which they were made [13:00] We don't have to deny what's true, but we get to choose what fills our awareness and which stories we hold tightly vs. loosely — but only if we see them as stories [15:30] Question 2 — Is it helpful? We think stories are helpful for predicting future behaviors, but we're terrible predictors of our future selves [16:00] We overestimate the impact of events — one experience of being cheated on becomes "I can never trust anyone"; getting fired for a mistake becomes "I can never keep a job" [17:00] We see past and future through the lens of the present — hard to imagine not thinking tomorrow what we're thinking today; stories don't anticipate much change either [17:30] It's not about predicting the future better — it's about loosening the grip so we can be open to what is [19:00] Henry's clinical example: depressed clients who are certain they're miserable because of a job or relationship — he advises waiting until mood improves before deciding, because in that state the mind is unreliable [20:30] Question 3 — Is it kind? Kind speech from wisdom traditions: rooted in compassion, in support of the listener, sharing truth to promote growth and flourishing [21:00] Applying to ourselves: is the story rooted in compassion? Does it support you? Can it promote growth, or does it shrink your world? [21:30] Letting go of unkind stories does NOT mean rewriting them as Hallmark movies or phoenix-rising narratives — those things don't have to happen [22:00] Hard experiences don't need to shrink us OR require us to relentlessly optimize — both things can be true at once; we're wired for resilience, not relentless self-improvement [22:30] When we let go of unkind stories, we calm our nervous system, increase approach behaviors, become more likely to try again after screwing up [23:00] Kindness is an evolutionary superpower and one of the most effective tools for behavior change [23:30] Shame and self-criticism activate the stress and threat response, shutting down possibility; kindness and self-compassion activate learning and growth [24:00] Kindness is not just the nice thing to do — it's the condition that makes change possible; there is no other way [24:30] The three questions again: Is it true? Is it helpful? Is it kind? — join the Experiment to work with these in practice [25:00] Closing wisdom from Michael Singer, The Untethered Soul: "In order to be who you are, you must be willing to let go of who you think you are." Sources and Notes for Our Element of Letting Go: Alloy & Abramson. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441 Botvinick & Cohen. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. doi.org/10.1038/35784 Clark & Radomsky (2014). Introduction: A global perspective on unwanted intrusive thoughts. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.001 Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam's Sons. de Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. Doubleday. Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, fragments, handbook (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press. Feldman, et al. (2023). Interoceptive ability moderates the effect of physiological reactivity on social judgment. 10.1037/emo0001210 Freud, S. (1957). Mourning and melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917) Gottlieb, L. (2019). Maybe you should talk to someone: A therapist, her therapist, and our lives revealed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Jung, C. G. (1962). Commentary. In R. Wilhelm (Trans.), The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of life (C. F. Baynes, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1929) Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis. Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise. Ballantine Books. Luo, M. (2004, February 27). For exercise in New York futility, push button. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html MacCormack & Lindquis (2019). Feeling hangry? When hunger is conceptualized as emotion. 10.1037/emo0000422 Mauss, et al. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. doi.org/10.1037/a0022010 Morewedge, et al. (2010). Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.010 Moulding, et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006 Nhat Hanh, T. (1998). Fragrant palm leaves: Journals, 1962–1966. Parallax Press. Palmer, P. J. (2016, April 27). The gift of presence, the perils of advice. The On Being Project. https://onbeing.org/blog/the-gift-of-presence-the-perils-of-advice/ Paumgarten, N. (2008, April 21). Up and then down: The lives of elevators. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/04/21/up-and-then-down Rachman, S. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90007-2 Radomsky, et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002 Siegel, et al. (2018). Seeing what you feel: Affect drives visual perception of structurally neutral faces. 10.1177/0956797617741718 Singer, M. A. (2007). The untethered soul: The journey beyond yourself. New Harbinger Publications. Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. 10.1126/science.1229294 Wegner, et al. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5 Wilson & Gilbert. 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts! Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program. Please see our terms for more information. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org. Find more mental health resources here.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Letting Go of Intrusive Thoughts & Rumination: The Pink Elephant Paradox, The Whac-A-Mole Problem, & Skills That Actually Help [290] Oct 07, 2026
    Show notes

    Intrusive thoughts, rumination, worrying... these are nearly universal experiences and the most important thing, particularly when it comes to intrusive thoughts, is that the content doesn't matter as much as what you do with them. Whether it's a shocking thought that pops up out of nowhere or that rumination that woke you up at 3 am and then kept you up last night, the problem isn't necessarily the thought itself. It really has to do with how we grip onto those thoughts. The harder you try to suppress an unwanted thought, the more it comes back. That's the pink elephant paradox that Aimee talks about in this episode... did you try it? How'd you do?! Yeah, it's pretty much impossible to not think of pink elephants when you don't want to. That's the ironic process theory in action, and it's why trying to stop thoughts from coming or trying to shove them away rarely works. What does work is something far more subtle: noticing the thought, naming it as just a thought (not a fact, not a prediction, not a reflection of your character), and letting your attention move on. Ready to take action? Learn more about Experiments here. About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek. Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating. Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North. Questions this episode was made for: Q: Why do I keep having terrible, scary, disturbing, or intrusive thoughts? Does that mean something is wrong with me? A: No. Research has found that the content of intrusive thoughts doesn't predict worse outcomes or specific diagnoses; in fact, intrusive thoughts can be proof of how much you care about the opposite outcome; what matters isn't what the thought is, it's how tightly you grip it; this episode explains the mechanism and the path to loosening that grip. Of course, it is really important to reach out to a mental health professional if you feel overwhelmed by these thoughts. There are effective strategies that these care providers can help with. Q: Why does trying not to think about something make me think about it more? A: That's the pink elephant paradox or ironic process theory in action. Daniel Wegner's research shows that suppression and monitoring are two competing mental processes that both take cognitive effort, and the monitoring process ensures the thought keeps coming back; this episode explains how we can avoid this paradox. Full transcript here Key moments: [00:30] Recap of the series: four areas — letting go of intrusive thoughts, stories we tell ourselves, the myth of closure, and letting go of control [01:00] Rachman's definition of intrusive thoughts: repeatedly occurring, unwanted, difficult to control, accompanied by subjective discomfort [02:30] Study: ~94% of ~777 college students reported at least one intrusive thought in the last three months — Henry: one? Aimee: the 6% were probably lying [03:30] Most important research finding: the content of intrusive thoughts doesn't predict worse outcomes or specific diagnoses — it's not what the thought is, it's how often it shows up and how tightly we grab it [04:30] The skill: loosen the grip, and thoughts show up less — or at least take up less energy [06:30] We've been trained to do the opposite — to suppress and push away intrusive thoughts — which makes them stickier [07:00] The pink elephant paradox: don't think of a pink elephant... and everyone thinks of a pink elephant [07:30] Ironic process theory — Daniel Wegner; Dostoevsky earlier: "Try not to think of a polar bear, and you will see that cursed thing every minute" [08:00] The mechanism: two competing processes — suppression (distracting from the thought) and monitoring (checking if it came back) — both take cognitive effort [08:30] Whac-A-Mole as a metaphor: monitoring for moles (the intrusive thought) and whacking them (suppression) are both effortful and exhausting — and there's no Laffy Taffy reward at the end [11:00] Henry: start small — learn to recognize a thought as a thought; watch it arise and watch it recede if allowed [13:30] The real cost of intrusive ruminative thinking: complete absence of presence; those small moments add up over a lifetime [14:00] We can't be in two places at once: lost in thought and in the present moment — training and practice help us distinguish them [14:30] Somatic marker theory and embodied cognition: physical sensations can surge before an intrusive thought arises and make the thought feel more real [15:00] Affective realism: how we're feeling influences how we perceive the world — when feeling bad, the world looks worse; when feeling good, it looks better [15:30] Hangry as affective realism: hunger shifts perception of strangers more negatively; evolutionarily sensible, but not helpful without awareness [16:30] Interoceptive ability: the capacity to detect your own internal body sensations — heartbeat, breathing rate, pain, hunger; accurate noticing leads to accurate interpretation [17:30] Better interoceptive ability = less likely to have affect bleed into perception; the world doesn't look more irritating just because you are [18:30] We can work on interoceptive ability — Joy Lab Experiments do this every week [20:00] Catching emotional escalation early: a panic attack or emotional storm doesn't start at full intensity; if you notice the early subtle signs — tightening, constriction, vague sense something is wrong — and turn attention toward it, it often dissipates [21:00] Most escalation after the first surge is something we do to ourselves; you can't suppress the first unwanted thought — it comes from the unconscious — but once it shows up, you have choices [21:30] Do you believe it? Reinforce it by repeating or replaying it? Or notice it and let it move on? If you grab it, you give it power. If you touch it lightly, it passes [22:30] Aimee: this is rooted in self-compassion; thoughts don't arise from you alone — you're a thread in a big web; your thoughts are influenced by everything around you [23:30] The chips-and-canned-meat study: participants in a canned meat room predicted they'd like chips much more than those in a chocolate room — but actual enjoyment leveled out once they were eating [24:30] Two lessons: first, our environment seeds our thoughts (canned meat caused intrusive thoughts); second, when the thought was no longer influencing them, the prediction dissolved — present-moment experience replaced the thought [25:30] Humility: intrusive thoughts are often just a weird random mash of pink elephants, true crime, stress response, canned meat, past memories, anxiety — not a statement about moral character [26:00] Anne Lamott: "You can get the monkey off your back, but the circus never leaves town" — the circus gets quieter with practice, but it keeps coming [27:00] Henry ties it back to Letting Go: not pretending the thought never happened, not fighting or shoving it away; noticing it, naming it as just a thought, letting attention move on — gently [27:30] Judgment and self-criticism make thoughts sticky; self-compassion is what lets them pass through [28:00] The side effect: build this skill and thoughts escalate into full storms less often; when they do show up, you return to center quicker — it's preventive [28:30] This is a skill — the first 100 times feel awkward; by the 200th time it feels natural; you're literally rewiring how your brain responds [29:00] Join the Experiment for this episode; next episode: moving from single thoughts to the bigger stories we tell ourselves [29:30] Closing wisdom from Dr. Lisa Feldman Barrett: "Human beings are not at the mercy of mythical emotion circuits buried deep within animalistic parts of our highly evolved brain: we are architects of our own experience. Sources and Notes for Our Element of Letting Go: Alloy & Abramson. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441 Botvinick & Cohen. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. doi.org/10.1038/35784 Clark & Radomsky (2014). Introduction: A global perspective on unwanted intrusive thoughts. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.001 Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam's Sons. de Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. Doubleday. Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, fragments, handbook (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press. Feldman, et al. (2023). Interoceptive ability moderates the effect of physiological reactivity on social judgment. 10.1037/emo0001210 Freud, S. (1957). Mourning and melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917) Gottlieb, L. (2019). Maybe you should talk to someone: A therapist, her therapist, and our lives revealed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Jung, C. G. (1962). Commentary. In R. Wilhelm (Trans.), The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of life (C. F. Baynes, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1929) Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis. Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise. Ballantine Books. Luo, M. (2004, February 27). For exercise in New York futility, push button. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html MacCormack & Lindquis (2019). Feeling hangry? When hunger is conceptualized as emotion. 10.1037/emo0000422 Mauss, et al. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. doi.org/10.1037/a0022010 Morewedge, et al. (2010). Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.010 Moulding, et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006 Nhat Hanh, T. (1998). Fragrant palm leaves: Journals, 1962–1966. Parallax Press. Palmer, P. J. (2016, April 27). The gift of presence, the perils of advice. The On Being Project. https://onbeing.org/blog/the-gift-of-presence-the-perils-of-advice/ Paumgarten, N. (2008, April 21). Up and then down: The lives of elevators. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/04/21/up-and-then-down Rachman, S. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90007-2 Radomsky, et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002 Siegel, et al. (2018). Seeing what you feel: Affect drives visual perception of structurally neutral faces. 10.1177/0956797617741718 Singer, M. A. (2007). The untethered soul: The journey beyond yourself. New Harbinger Publications. Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. 10.1126/science.1229294 Wegner, et al. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5 Wilson & Gilbert. 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts! Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program. Please see our terms for more information. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org. Find more mental health resources here.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    What Are You Holding On To? The Science & Skill of Letting Go [289] Oct 01, 2026
    Show notes

    We define "Letting Go" as the skill of loosening your grip on the thoughts and behaviors that keep you anchored to the past, resisting the present, or anxious about the future. And the goal isn't just to be more present, but to be less burdened and exhausted by the endless effort to edit what happened, control what's happening, and predict what's coming next. When you stop pouring energy into all of that, you get that energy back. We also describe letting go surrendering to what is or allowing things to be as they actually are.

    Importantly, letting go is not avoidance, withdrawal, or slamming the door and suppressing emotion. Letting go is closer to what psychologists call psychological flexibility and non-attachment, which means you engage fully with your experiences and feelings without being controlled by the outcomes. You still feel; you just choose what to do with the feeling instead of being driven by it.

    The big takeaway is that, again, this is a skill. It doesn't matter how terrible you think you are at letting go, it simply takes practice. In our episodes and experiments for this Element of "letting go," we'll cover four areas where the grip tends to be tightest: unhelpful thoughts and rumination, the bigger stories we tell ourselves, the myth that we need closure to move on, and maybe the hardest of all... letting go of control. Tune in for each episode to help you build your skill of letting go and recapture some energy and freedom.

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible).

    Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app:

    Spotify | Apple | YouTube

    Full transcript here

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Letting Go:

    • Alloy & Abramson. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? 10.1037//0096-3445.108.4.441
    • Botvinick & Cohen. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. doi.org/10.1038/35784
    • Clark & Radomsky (2014). Introduction: A global perspective on unwanted intrusive thoughts. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.001
    • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam's Sons.
    • de Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. Doubleday.
    • Epictetus. (2014). Discourses, fragments, handbook (R. Hard, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
    • Feldman, et al. (2023). Interoceptive ability moderates the effect of physiological reactivity on social judgment. 10.1037/emo0001210

    • Freud, S. (1957). Mourning and melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 243–258). Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1917)
    • Gottlieb, L. (2019). Maybe you should talk to someone: A therapist, her therapist, and our lives revealed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    • Jung, C. G. (1962). Commentary. In R. Wilhelm (Trans.), The secret of the golden flower: A Chinese book of life (C. F. Baynes, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1929)
    • Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis.
    • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.
    • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
    • Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise. Ballantine Books.

    • Luo, M. (2004, February 27). For exercise in New York futility, push button. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/for-exercise-in-new-york-futility-push-button.html
    • MacCormack & Lindquis (2019). Feeling hangry? When hunger is conceptualized as emotion. 10.1037/emo0000422

    • Mauss, et al. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. doi.org/10.1037/a0022010
    • Morewedge, et al. (2010). Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.010

    • Moulding, et al. (2014). Part 2. They scare because we care: The relationship between obsessive intrusive thoughts and appraisals and control strategies across 15 cities. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.02.006

    • Nhat Hanh, T. (1998). Fragrant palm leaves: Journals, 1962–1966. Parallax Press.
    • Palmer, P. J. (2016, April 27). The gift of presence, the perils of advice. The On Being Project. https://onbeing.org/blog/the-gift-of-presence-the-perils-of-advice/
    • Paumgarten, N. (2008, April 21). Up and then down: The lives of elevators. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/04/21/up-and-then-down
    • Rachman, S. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. 10.1016/0146-6402(81)90007-2

    • Radomsky, et al. (2014). Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(3), 269–279. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002

    • Siegel, et al. (2018). Seeing what you feel: Affect drives visual perception of structurally neutral faces. 10.1177/0956797617741718

    • Singer, M. A. (2007). The untethered soul: The journey beyond yourself. New Harbinger Publications.
    • Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). The end of history illusion. 10.1126/science.1229294
    • Wegner, et al. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5

    • Wilson & Gilbert. 2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: What does "letting go" actually mean? Isn't it just telling yourself not to care?

    A: Letting go isn't about suppressing feelings, slamming doors, or becoming detached; it's closer to psychological flexibility and allowing, where you engage fully with your experiences without being controlled by the outcomes you're gripping. Importantly, letting go is a skill and this series will help you build it.

    Q: Why is letting go so hard even when I know intellectually that holding on isn't helping me?

    A: We hear you! It's hard because your brain is doing exactly what it was wired to do; the tiger-and-tree-branch story we told in the episode illustrates it perfectly: We grip what feels familiar and known even when it's limiting us, because uncertain ground feels more dangerous than a bad branch; the good news is that letting go is a learnable skill, and the series ahead covers the four areas where the grip tends to be tightest.

    Key moments:

    [00:00] A working definition of "letting go:" the skill of loosening your grip on thoughts and behaviors that keep you anchored to the past, resisting the present, or anxious about the future

    [01:00] The impact: being less burdened and exhausted by the effort to edit what happened, control what's happening, and predict what's coming next — and reclaiming that energy

    [03:00] Another frame: surrendering to what is; allowing things to be as they are and actually gives more agency

    [05:30] What Letting Go is NOT: avoidance, withdrawal, suppressing feelings, rejection, disengagement — it doesn't mean you stop caring

    [06:00] Letting Go enables psychological flexibility and non-attachment — engaging fully with experiences without grasping at outcomes

    [08:00] The tiger and tree branch story

    [10:00] Letting go of what feels familiar can feel scarier than staying stuck with something that isn't working

    [10:30] This is learnable; Joy Lab will work on it together

    [11:30] Four upcoming areas: (1) letting go of unhelpful thoughts. (2) Letting go of the bigger stories we tell ourselves. (3) The myth that we need closure. (4) Letting go of control.

    [14:00] Closing wisdom from Anthony de Mello: "You don't have to add anything in order to be happy; you've got to drop something."

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    A Mental Health Podcast With No Ads? Why We Refuse Ads & How Joy Lab Keeps Going [288] Sep 30, 2026
    Show notes

    If you've listened to a wellness or health podcast lately, you've probably heard loads of advertisements. We've decided that ads are not a good fit for Joy Lab because they can steal your focus from the important wellbeing-boosting work you do here. Of course, refusing to put ads in the podcast means we need support in other ways.

    Here are some ways you can join in our nonprofit mission, help keep Joy Lab going, and spread more resilience across our communities:

    1. Subscribe to Joy Lab Experiments. These are the hands-on resilience practices that pair with each episode. You can subscribe in Apple podcasts for $4.99/month with a free one-week trial. Spotify and other platforms are coming soon!
    2. Stay tuned for updates to Joy Lab+ (formerly the Joy Lab Program). You can receive Joy Lab+ with a monthly donation to our nonprofit. You'll get Experiments plus lots of other perks. We'll have this ready soon, but be sure to sign up for the newsletter at JoyLab.coach so you're in the loop.
    3. We'll soon launch our growth and mission partnerships. These are for organizations, companies, foundations, or individuals who want to make a bigger impact on mental health access. These will launch in the next few weeks and we only have 24 spots available! Head to JoyLab.coach or reach out through the website to learn more.

    Most of all, thanks for being part of this resilience-boosting community. Your participation matters. It matters to your own mental health and it spreads out to others. Stay with us for our new Element of Letting Go, where we'll focus on releasing unhelpful thoughts, limiting stories, the "need" for closure, and control.

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: How is Joy Lab funded if there are no ads?

    A: Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North. It's kept ad-free intentionally and runs on listener support through Experiments subscriptions, Joy Lab+, donations, grants, and additional partnerships; this episode explains ways to get involved.

    Q: What's the difference between Joy Lab Experiments and Joy Lab+?

    A: Experiments are the hands-on practices that pair with each episode, now available on Apple Podcasts for $4.99/month (coming soon to Spotify and others!); Joy Lab+ is a more full experience with additional resources and features. Existing Program members don't need to do anything when it launches.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible).

    Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app:

    Spotify | Apple | YouTube

    Full transcript here

    Related Joy Lab Episodes:

    • Enoughness Series:
      • Ep. 287: Who Are You Trying to Be Enough For? The Psychology of Being Enough & Building Self-Worth
      • Ep. 286: It's OK to Be Wrong: Releasing Perfectionism & Building the Skill of Knowing Enough
      • Ep. 285: Why Doing Enough Is Enough + Why Perfectionism Predicts Burnout, Depression, & Anxiety, Not Performance
      • Ep. 284: Having Enough: Why Acquiring More Will Never Fill the Hole in Your Self-Worth
      • Ep. 283: You Are Enough: The Science and Practices of Enoughness
    • Grief Series starts here:
      • Ep. 248: Grief, Growth, & The Wholeness of Being Human
    • Ep. 239: Caring What Others Think Isn't Your Weakness

    Key moments:

    [00:30] Preview of the Letting Go series: unhelpful thoughts and rumination, stories we tell ourselves, the myth of needing closure, and letting go of control

    [01:00] Why Joy Lab is ad-free — intentional choice; ads interrupt the work and can make you feel worse about yourself by design

    [01:30] Joy Lab is powered by Pathways North, a nonprofit focused on increasing access to empowering mental health tools

    [02:00] How to support: Joy Lab Experiments now available on Apple Podcasts — $4.99/month, cheaper annually, one-week free trial

    [02:30] Pairing an episode with an Experiment week after week is the consistent, sustainable approach that builds real resilience

    [03:00] Joy Lab+ — the updated name for the Joy Lab Program, coming in a few weeks with new features; existing members, nothing changes

    [03:30] New: mission and growth partnership spots opening for organizations, companies, foundations, or individuals who want to make a bigger impact — sign up for the newsletter or contact through the website

    [05:00] You matter — thank you for being here

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Enoughness:

    • Bellam, S., Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Stoeber, J. (2025). Perfectionism and work performance: A meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12570
    • Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007002
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.392
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). Reaping the benefits of pursuing self-esteem without the costs? Reply to Schmuck and Sheldon (2004), Sheldon et al. (2004), Pyszczynski et al. (2004), and Kernis (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.430
    • Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.507
    • Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
    • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.473
    • Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
    • Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Bujold Steed, L., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018). Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324
    • Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
    • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
    • Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262
    • Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
    • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 411–436). Blackwell.
    • Leary, M. R. (2000). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000045
    • Maslach, C. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
    • Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2005). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277030
    • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966406
    • Lynn Twist's Book: The Soul of Money

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    Who Are You Trying to Be Enough For? The Psychology of Being Enough & Building Self-Worth [287] Sep 23, 2026
    Show notes

    Are you struggling with not feeling like "enough?" This is actually a common feeling that can get wrapped up or conflated with stress, burnout, depression, anxiety, and so many other mental health struggles. The good news is that no matter what you're dealing with, you do have some influence here and can work on skills to build our sense of self-worth and enoughness. We'll dig into Self-discrepancy theory, which explains how the gaps between our actual, ideal, and ought selves can stir up dejection or anxiety. We'll also explore sociometer theory and the metaphor for self-esteem as a fuel gauge that rises with appreciation and drops with rejection. The truth is, these calculations and gauges will always fluctuate. The real work isn't eliminating the gauges or the dips, but building an internal reserve, a sense of enoughness, that doesn't depend on outside refueling.

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible).

    Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app:

    Spotify | Apple | YouTube

    Full transcript here

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Enoughness:

    • Related Joy Lab Episodes:
      • Enoughness Series:
        • Ep. 215: Are You Curious to Learn or Confirm?
        • Ep. 285: Why Doing Enough Is Enough + Why Perfectionism Predicts Burnout, Depression, & Anxiety, Not Performance
        • Ep. 284: Having Enough: Why Acquiring More Will Never Fill the Hole in Your Self-Worth
        • Ep. 283: You Are Enough: The Science and Practices of Enoughness
      • Grief Series starts here: Ep. 248: Grief, Growth, & The Wholeness of Being Human
      • Ep. 239: Caring What Others Think Isn't Your Weakness
    • Bellam, S., Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Stoeber, J. (2025). Perfectionism and work performance: A meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12570
    • Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007002
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.392
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). Reaping the benefits of pursuing self-esteem without the costs? Reply to Schmuck and Sheldon (2004), Sheldon et al. (2004), Pyszczynski et al. (2004), and Kernis (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.430
    • Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.507
    • Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
    • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.473
    • Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
    • Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Bujold Steed, L., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018). Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324
    • Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
    • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
    • Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262
    • Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
    • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 411–436). Blackwell.
    • Leary, M. R. (2000). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000045
    • Maslach, C. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
    • Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2005). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277030
    • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966406
    • Lynn Twist's Book: The Soul of Money

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: Why do I feel like I'm never enough no matter what I achieve or how hard I try?

    A: This episode maps some psychology of enoughness: self-discrepancy theory shows how unconscious gaps between your actual, ideal, and ought selves generate specific emotional consequences (depression from the ideal gap, anxiety from the ought gap); sociometer theory explains how self-esteem tracks with perceived relational value rather than objective achievement (and why negative feedback stings harder than positive feedback heals); the path toward enoughness is building an internal source of worth rather than depending on the gauge.

    Q: Is it possible to genuinely feel like enough without abandoning the desire to grow or improve?

    A: Yes. Fighting to be someone different from who you are keeps you stuck; it's through accepting who you are that change and growth actually become possible. Self-worth, self-acceptance, and self-compassion are key factors for behavior change.

    Key moments:

    [00:30] The central question: who are we trying to be enough for? A parent, a boss, a child, ourselves?

    [01:30] Self-discrepancy theory: three representations of self — actual, ideal, and ought — and how gaps between them generate negative emotions

    [03:30] These calculations often run below conscious awareness; self-discrepancy theory maps which gaps produce which feelings

    [04:00] Actual vs. ideal gap: tends to produce dejection-related emotions — sadness, depression, shame, embarrassment

    [04:30] Actual vs. ought gap: tends to produce agitation-related emotions — anxiety, fear, guilt, feeling threatened

    [05:00] Feeling not enough isn't usually just one thing — it's multiple calculations happening at once, often measuring us against someone else's ruler

    [06:00] Henry: how accurately can any of us describe our actual selves?

    [07:30] Henry: we'll never become our ideal selves or have the ideal life — this might be another Gate of Grief worth naming and grieving

    [09:00] Toxic positivity pushback: this isn't about not dreaming big; it's about not attaching your worth to whether you get there

    [10:00] Sociometer theory: self-esteem isn't primarily about how good you think you are at things — it's about how valued you feel in your relationships

    [12:00] When we don't embrace our own worth, the gauge takes over how we see and value ourselves

    [13:00] Henry: intermittent reinforcement — if self-esteem depends on occasional good feedback and tanks on bad feedback, we're psychologically vulnerable

    [14:00] Rejection sensitivity: a potent clinical cause of anxiety and depression; the possibility of rejection alone can shrink a life significantly

    [15:30] Aimee: we're wired to care what others think; caring isn't the problem; the problem is being unconscious to how much it drives us

    [16:30] The gauges don't need to be broken — they're functioning; the goal is to not attach our worth to them

    [17:30] The sense of enoughness is an oasis of self-compassion and inner knowing — you matter, you're a person of value, even when rejected, even when empty

    [20:30] This isn't solitary work: support, community, and daily practices all help build the internal gas station

    [22:00] The happiness paradox: research shows that highly valuing happiness — treating it as something to actively pursue at all times — leads to feeling less happy and worse long-term wellbeing outcomes

    [24:30] Henry: the difference between valuing joy and grasping at happiness; grasping operates from scarcity — the very grasping creates stress

    [26:00] Series takeaways: feeling not enough is tragically common; the antidote is self-compassion; most of us hold an unreachable ideal — our job isn't to reach it, it's to let go

    [27:00] Preview of the next two Elements: Letting Go (October) and Self-Compassion (November) — more tools to embrace Enoughness

    [28:00] Closing wisdom from Brené Brown: "You are imperfect, you are wired for struggle, but you are worthy of love and belonging."

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    It's OK to Be Wrong: Releasing Perfectionism & Building the Skill of Knowing Enough [286] Sep 16, 2026
    Show notes

    What does it means to know enough, and why do so many of us have our sense of self-worth tangled up with the need to appear certain, informed, and never wrong? The common obstacles of perfectionism, yearning for power and to feel "special," along with anxiety are fueled by a world of constant information, public scrutiny, and the subtle pressure to prove our intelligence. It makes a tough environment to come back to the wisdom Socrates shared 2,500 years ago: real wisdom lives in knowing what you don't know.

    The good news: getting comfortable with being wrong is a practice, not a personality trait. And the more you do it (starting small and safe), then the more your nervous system learns that doubt isn't dangerous.

    About: The Joy Lab Podcast is an Ambie-nominated podcast that blends science and soul to help you cope better with stress, anxiety, and depression. It's hosted by integrative psychiatrist Dr. Henry Emmons and holistic mental health researcher Dr. Aimee Prasek.

    Bonus: spread some joy and keep this podcast ad-free by donating (Joy Lab is powered by the nonprofit Pathways North and your donations are tax-deductible).

    Listen & follow the Joy Lab Podcast on your favorite listening app:

    Spotify | Apple | YouTube

    Full transcript here

    Sources and Notes for Our Element of Enoughness:

    • Related Joy Lab Episodes:
      • Ep. 215: Are You Curious to Learn or Confirm?
      • Ep. 285: Why Doing Enough Is Enough + Why Perfectionism Predicts Burnout, Depression, & Anxiety, Not Performance
      • Ep. 284: Having Enough: Why Acquiring More Will Never Fill the Hole in Your Self-Worth
      • Ep. 283: You Are Enough: The Science and Practices of Enoughness
    • Bellam, S., Curran, T., Hill, A. P., & Stoeber, J. (2025). Perfectionism and work performance: A meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12570
    • Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007002
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.392
    • Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). Reaping the benefits of pursuing self-esteem without the costs? Reply to Schmuck and Sheldon (2004), Sheldon et al. (2004), Pyszczynski et al. (2004), and Kernis (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.430
    • Crocker, J., Karpinski, A., Quinn, D. M., & Chase, S. K. (2003). When grades determine self-worth: Consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.507
    • Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593
    • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: Comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.473
    • Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
    • Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Bujold Steed, L., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018). Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324
    • Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
    • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
    • Joseph, S., & Linley, P. A. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262
    • Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
    • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 411–436). Blackwell.
    • Leary, M. R. (2000). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: Getting to the root of self-esteem. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000045
    • Maslach, C. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
    • Park, L. E., & Crocker, J. (2005). Attachment styles and contingencies of self-worth. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205277030
    • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966406
    • Lynn Twist's Book: The Soul of Money

    Questions this episode was made for:

    Q: Why do I feel like I have to know everything and never be wrong... and how do I stop?

    A: This episode traces the drive to perform knowledge back to things like anxiety about judgment and the desire for specialness, along with the amygdala hijack that makes being wrong feel like a survival threat, and offers a practical strategy: exposure. Practice being wrong in small, safe ways until your nervous system recalibrates and realizes it isn't catastrophic.

    Q: Can you actually be too certain? Isn't confidence a good thing?

    A: Being too certain can be detrimental. This episode unpacks the differences between genuine knowledge, intellectual humility, and the performance of certainty for reasons outside of genuine knowledge.

    Key moments:

    [00:30] Setting the scene: Athens, 2,500 years ago — a friend asks the Oracle of Delphi who is the wisest person in the city

    [02:30] Socrates' conclusion: maybe he was wiser because he knew what he didn't know, and didn't shy away from that unknowing; kept asking questions

    [03:30] Intellectual humility: holding your beliefs loosely, staying curious, genuinely believing you might be wrong

    [04:00] The Enoughness layer: the belief that you have to prove your knowledge to be worthy; knowing more makes you enough

    [05:00] It's exhausting to feel like you need to know all the answers, to be right all the time — and none of us can actually succeed at it

    [05:30] Two drivers: anxiety (fear of being judged for being wrong) and the desire for power or certainty as protection from vulnerability

    [07:00] The desire for specialness: inflating self-esteem through the performance of knowing it all

    [07:30] Research on narcissism and conspiratorial thinking: conspiracy theories offer the feeling of uniqueness — "I know something you don't"

    [10:00] Henry: a small pitch for narcissism — a little bit isn't bad; we all want to feel special sometimes; full-blown narcissists wouldn't be listening to this anyway

    [11:00] The belonging need: we don't have to stand out to belong, but we do need to be seen as worthy of inclusion — so we avoid sticking our neck out and being wrong in front of others

    [11:30] Social media amplifies this: anything put out publicly can be validated or challenged — rarely challenged without feeling diminished

    [14:00] The internet requires a new kind of resilience and emotional regulation we haven't trained before in human history — much of which is what Joy Lab works on

    [15:30] Being wrong is so often worse in our heads than in real life — especially when we're willing to admit it; humility actually strengthens connection

    [17:30] Henry: when the fear of being wrong tips into clinical anxiety or mood problems — perfectionism creates a downward spiral

    [18:00] The amygdala hijack: the midbrain can't distinguish between a perceived threat (being wrong in front of others) and a real physical threat — fight or flight activates as though lives are at stake

    [18:30] How to get out: exposure — practice being wrong in small, safe ways; when your nervous system learns it isn't catastrophic, it recalibrates

    [20:30] Good news: we have many opportunities every day to practice being wrong — the more you check in, the more you notice them

    [21:00] The Experiment for this episode works on getting more comfortable with being wrong

    If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review us wherever you listen to your favorite podcasts!

    Please remember that this content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide medical advice and is not a replacement for advice and treatment from a medical professional. Please consult your doctor or other qualified health professional before beginning any diet change, supplement, or lifestyle program.

    Please see our terms for more information.

    If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call the NAMI HelpLine: 1-800-950-6264 available Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. – 10 p.m., ET. OR text "HelpLine" to 62640 or email NAMI at helpline@nami.org. Visit NAMI for more. You can also call or text SAMHSA at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org.

    Find more mental health resources here.


    1 2 3 30 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Fresh Air

    1

    Fresh Air Arts
    Twenty Thousand Hertz

    2

    Twenty Thousand Hertz Arts
    The Black Tapes

    3

    The Black Tapes Arts
    Snap Judgment

    4

    Snap Judgment Arts
    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin

    5

    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin Arts
    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc.

    6

    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc. Arts
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights