TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Natural Sciences

    Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

    Think like a physicist. Wonder like a human. Into the Impossible is where Cosmic Conversations happen — uniting Nobel Prize winners, iconoclasts, authors, and technologists to explore reality’s deepest questions. From AI to aliens, from biophysics to the brain, from the cosmos to the multiverse, Brian Keating, Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor of Physics at UC San Diego covers it all.
    If you’ve ever asked What’s out there? or What’s next?, this is where curiosity meets clarity.
    Learn to think like this. 🎙 Full episodes, notes & more: briankeating.com/podcast

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2023 Big Bang Productions Inc. 719843

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Wharton AI Researcher: If AI Froze Today, It Would Still Rewrite Work Oct 20, 2026
    Show notes

    Forecasters gave AI under 2% odds of helping solve a millennium-level math problem by September 2026. It happened. Ethan Mollick has been measuring what AI actually does to real work with field experiments, not forecasts, and his answer is not what most people expect. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.

    Mollick runs the Generative AI Lab at Wharton. He is the author of Co-Intelligence and Coexistence, his new book on navigating a world where AI tools are already good enough to change almost all intellectual work, even if progress stopped today.

    The conversation covers the jagged frontier: why AI solved a math olympiad before it could count the Rs in strawberry, what it means that roles blur when everyone on a team starts using AI, and what four human advantages still hold an edge when a model can already write a publishable paper. It also covers what happens when your kids tell you that you sound like Claude.

    What you’ll hear:

    • What centaur, cyborg, and conjurer work actually look like in a real academic lab
    • Why brainstorming was considered a bad idea shortly after it was invented and what that means for working with AI
    • Why Mollick reduced em dashes in his new book and what that tells you about living alongside these models
    • What co-evolution might look like if the escalator keeps moving

    “If we just had the models we have right now, that’s enough to change almost all of human work in the next ten years. It’s good enough.” — Ethan Mollick


    CHAPTERS

    00:00 AI writes good papers now. Taste is the weak spot.

    03:14 The jagged frontier: math olympiad gold, but not the Rs in strawberry

    06:30 Deep knowledge, wide knowledge, taste, and agency

    09:44 Escalator or eschaton?

    16:02 Does AI simulate wisdom or actually have it?

    23:46 The labs keep AI in English. Here is why.

    32:28 Roles blur. Everyone does everything now.

    36:42 My kids say I sound like Claude. They might be right.

    38:12 AI found errors in his sources that his fact-checkers missed

    46:34 What to do before giving a child access to AI


    Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai

    Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

    Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

    Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

    Featured Guest:

    Ethan Mollick on Twitter/X: https://x.com/emollick?lang=en

    Coexistence (book and site): https://co-existence.ai/

    One Useful Thing (Substack): https://www.oneusefulthing.org/

    My books:

    Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

    Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW

    Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

    Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

    Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

    Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

    Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

    Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #EthanMollick #AI #artificialintelligence #AItools #briankeating #intotheimpossible #AIagents

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Are UFOs Alien Tech? Avi Loeb vs Michael Shermer Oct 14, 2026
    Show notes

    Is there alien technology in our skies, or just birds, balloons and bad video?

    Two members of the White House UAP Science Advisory Council face off LIVE. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, who chairs the council, makes the case for searching. Michael Shermer, the council skeptic Loeb picked himself, says show me the evidence. They have $1,000 riding on whether non-human technology is confirmed by 2030.

    Get all my best ET content: https://big-bang.kit.com/bvyt

    We'll cover the redacted Pentagon videos, Loeb's new papers on tracking objects over Nevada, the claims from David Grusch, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Eric Weinstein, and what evidence would change each of their minds.

    Avi Loeb: https://avi-loeb.medium.com/
    Michael Shermer: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/10/08/opinion/aliens-uap-ufo-videos-trump/

    Subscribe to The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1
    Sponsorships and speaking: https://BrianKeating.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Adam Grant: Don't Trust Your Gut. Test It. Oct 13, 2026
    Show notes

    When two people are vibing, their brainwaves synchronize and so do their heartbeats. That is not a metaphor. It is a measurable physiological event, and organizational psychologist Adam Grant has spent his career figuring out how to make it happen on purpose. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.

    Grant’s new book Vibe is his seventh. It argues that the science of human connection has been hiding in plain sight for a century, and that most of what people do to build relationships is either backwards or unnecessary.

    The episode covers why the highest sign of chemistry between people is enjoying your disagreements rather than avoiding them, why remote work produces boreout rather than burnout, and why your first impression of someone is a snapshot of one situation that may not represent the whole person. It also covers burstiness, confident humility, and why universities have survived COVID, AI, and every other disruption that was supposed to end them.

    What you’ll hear:

    • Why the pendulum clock experiment from 1665 explains what happens when people stop trying to force a connection
    • What the HiPPO effect does to a team and why the highest paid person’s opinion kills creative ideas
    • Why Grant ran experiments on university fundraising callers that tripled their revenue with a five-minute intervention
    • What desirability bias is and why Grant thinks it is more dangerous than confirmation bias
    • Why Grant A/B tested the subtitle of his own book and what “relationships” signaled that “connections” did not
    • What Grant and Brian agree on about false certainty and thinking in conditional probabilities

    “The highest sign of chemistry between people is not agreeing with them. It’s enjoying your disagreements.” — Adam Grant

    CHAPTERS

    00:00 Vibing is real. Your brainwaves prove it.

    05:30 Task conflict vs. relationship conflict

    07:40 Who is actually in charge: parents or infants?

    10:14 Burstiness: the remote work pattern that works

    14:24 Don’t trust your gut. Test it.

    19:34 Confident humility: the essence of a good scientist

    21:32 Desirability bias is worse than confirmation bias

    29:00 Zoom fatigue is boreout, not burnout

    30:02 The A/B test that killed “relationships”

    34:14 Don’t disbelieve what can’t be falsified

    Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai

    Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

    Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

    Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

    Featured Guest:

    Adam Grant website: https://adamgrant.net/

    Vibe (book): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GPHPNZ14

    Adam Grant on Twitter/X: https://x.com/adammgrant

    My books:

    Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

    Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW

    Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

    Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

    Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

    Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

    Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

    Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #AdamGrant #loneliness #remotework #psychology #briankeating #intotheimpossible #Vibe

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Roman Yampolskiy vs Joscha Bach: Can Anyone Control Superintelligence? Oct 09, 2026
    Show notes

    Roman Yampolskiy says keeping a superintelligence safe forever is as impossible as building a perpetual motion machine. Joscha Bach says today's AI is more controllable than anyone expected, and that shutting it down would doom us anyway.

    📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/ai

    Roman Yampolskiy is a computer scientist at the University of Louisville who has spent more than a decade on the AI control problem. Joscha Bach is a cognitive scientist who studies how minds, biological and artificial, build a model of reality.

    We cover: why a perpetual safety device may be as impossible as perpetual motion, what happens when AI research automates itself (Roman puts it at 28 percent today), whether nuclear deterrence is the right analogy, who really benefits when AI labs ask to be regulated, and why consciousness may have nothing to do with whether AI is safe.

    Being conscious does not make you kind.

    00:00 Simulation theory meets certain doom
    03:25 Is P(doom) even a real number?
    06:05 Why a simulated world still matters
    09:26 Should we have skipped the Trinity test?
    13:04 Did nukes actually keep the peace?
    17:32 Why haven't we wiped out the spiders?
    22:35 Is AI doom falsifiable?
    25:48 Why a self-driving car isn't the threat
    29:27 Roman's 28% automation number
    34:46 Intelligence is not agency
    39:20 Can superintelligence be proven safe?
    42:40 Who wins when AI labs ask for regulation?
    47:45 Does consciousness make AI safer?
    53:48 Would a perfect mind discover God?
    58:37 The Tower of Babel, read backward
    1:03:52 Can you control a mind a million times smarter?
    1:04:43 The narrow AI path Roman wants instead

    🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @plinz
    🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @romanyam

    📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/ai
    🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: patreon.com/drbriankeating

    ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: youtube.com/@drbriankeating

    📚 My books:
    Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
    Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
    Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
    Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

    🌐 More:
    🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @BrianKeating
    📚 Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com/
    ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
    🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #intotheimpossible #briankeating #science #physics #astronomy #cosmology #podcast #universe

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    "I Thought It Would Fail!" Francis Halzen: Winner of the 2026 Nobel Prize In Physics [Reupload from 2022] Oct 07, 2026
    Show notes

    The physicist who turned a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice into a telescope says the most exciting moment of his career was not the discovery. It was the first atmospheric neutrino. Before that, he was deep in debt to NSF and his own university with no neutrino to show for it.

    Francis Halzen is principal investigator of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole and Hilldale and Gregory Breit Distinguished Professor of Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    We cover: why ice under the South Pole is clearer than anything a lab can make, the 2,600 TeV event that dwarfs the LHC, why IceCube sees more energy in cosmic neutrinos than in gamma rays, how neutrinos crossing the universe test quantum gravity, and the quark he refused to believe in.

    Physics is a miserable career unless you are obsessed by it.

    Recorded in 2022, before IceCube detected neutrinos from our own galaxy.

    Learn from Nobel Prize winners, and you could win a meteorite: Please join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/x

    Chapters
    00:00 Physics is a miserable career, unless
    02:54 A textbook written before the W was found
    06:11 Breaking into Lemaître's computer at night
    10:57 Do scientists owe the public anything?
    13:55 Deep in debt with zero neutrinos
    19:40 The persuasion nobody teaches scientists
    20:15 Why it could only be the South Pole
    23:20 Learn physics by doing, not by courses
    26:00 How to turn Antarctic ice into a telescope
    31:30 2,600 TeV: far beyond the LHC
    35:00 More energy in neutrinos than gamma rays
    40:00 Tracing ghost particles to NGC 1068
    46:00 Testing quantum gravity with neutrinos
    1:01:00 Ten times the ice for the same price
    1:07:08 What he would leave his descendants
    1:11:19 What his generation should be proud of
    1:12:51 The quark he refused to believe in
    1:17:09 Imagination can trump intelligence

    📺 Watch my most popular videos:
    Neil Turok Believes Physics Is In Crisis
    Nobel Prizewinner Frank Wilczek
    Stephen Wolfram vs. Eric Weinstein
    Sir Roger Penrose: Nobel Prize in Physics, Black Holes and More
    Noam Chomsky: Consciousness, Elon Musk, and More
    Sabine Hossenfelder
    Avi Loeb: UFOs and UAPs
    Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Follow me to ask questions of my guests:
    🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @DrBrianKeating
    📝 Mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list
    ✍️ Detailed blog posts: briankeating.com/blog
    🎙️ Listen on audio-only platforms: briankeating.com/podcast

    A production of imagination.ucsd.edu
    Executive Producer: Brian Keating
    Producer P.G.A: Stuart Volkow
    Editing: Lucas Scheiblich

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Nobel Economist Daron Acemoglu WARNING: AI's Payoff Is NOT What You Think Oct 05, 2026
    Show notes

    Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu says AI's real productivity gain is an order of magnitude smaller than the industry claims.

    The bigger danger is not the machine. It is that a handful of people are deciding how it gets built.

    Daron Acemoglu is an MIT economist who shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.

    We cover: why a Nobel chemist left Berkeley for China, the optimal amount of heresy science should tolerate, the one rule that would end algorithmic outrage without censoring anyone, the accounting trick behind billionaire wealth, and why AI's path is a design decision, not destiny.

    We are still a democracy. Perhaps not for long.

    Chapters:

      0:00 Can science survive without democracy?t
      2:08 Why a Nobel laureate left Berkeley for Chinat
      3:58 What Galileo knew that Kepler didn'tt
      5:12 Is peer review undemocratic?t
      7:41 The optimal amount of scientific heresyt
      10:06 Science isn't slowing. So what broke?t
      12:06 The design choice behind echo chamberst
      14:49 One rule that would fix social mediat
      19:26 Should Elon Musk have this much wealth?t
      23:49 AI is a design choice, not destinyt

    ———

    📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    🔔 Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating

    🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon — get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: / drbriankeating

    ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: / @drbriankeating

    📚 My books:

      Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpAt
      Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFut
      Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9Ut
      Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Unt

    🌐 More:

      🏄‍♂️ Twitter: / briankeating
      📚 Substack https://briankeating.substack.com/ss
      ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
      🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #intotheimpossible #briankeating #science #physics #astronomy #cosmology #podcast #universe

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    AI Is the New Tower of Babel (And Its Builders Know It) Oct 03, 2026
    Show notes

    The new Tower of Babel, and its builders are becoming like gods to us. The bigger threat isn't killer robots; it's how much of your own mind you've already handed over.

    I joined Mike Slater on Politics By Faith (The First) to talk about AI, faith, and the people building it.

    We cover: why Babel is always the city AND the tower, how the same AI that discovers drugs can build super viruses, what I'm seeing in my own classroom as term begins, why cognitive offloading scares me more than Terminators, and the one thing AI still can't do without us.

    AI belongs in your hands as a thinking partner, never the primary creator.

    Chapters:

      00:00 Mike Slater introduces Brian Keating (cosmologist, not cosmetologist)
      00:37 Why AI is the Tower of Babel — the city and the tower
      02:05 The double-edged sword: new drugs vs. super viruses
      02:57 Altman, Amodei, Musk — "they become like gods to us"
      03:42 "Regulate us, take us over" — who really wants that
      04:23 A scientist weighs progress: "I'm an accelerationist"
      05:19 AI as a curiosity amplifier, not a shortcut
      06:04 First day of class at UC San Diego — the war over AI
      07:22 Thinking partner, not primary creator — and the nuclear analogy
      08:20 Cognitive offloading — how many phone numbers do you remember?
      09:17 The worldview of the people running AI
      10:35 Why I'm not a doomer — and what to actually do (local models)

    ———

    📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    🔔 Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeatin...

    🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon — get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: / drbriankeating

    ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: / @drbriankeating

    📚 My books:

      Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
      Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
      Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
      Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

    🌐 More:

      🏄‍♂️ Twitter: /briankeating
      📚 Substack https://briankeating.substack.com/ss
      ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
      🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #intotheimpossible #briankeating #science #physics #astronomy #cosmology #podcast #universe

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Robert Wright: AI Alignment Is a Moral Problem, Not a Technical One Sep 30, 2026
    Show notes

    The real AI alignment problem is not technical. It is moral. You cannot align a superintelligence to human values if humans cannot agree on what those values are, and you cannot get that agreement without a level of global cooperation we have never managed before. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.


    The Tower of Babel is the AI parable nobody is reading. Technology that outpaces wisdom fragments the people building it. The Fermi paradox offers the grimmer version: civilizations that reach the capacity to blow themselves up typically do. Robert Wright has been watching this longer than almost anyone, he was reporting on neural networks in 1983, and his conclusion is not that the machines will fail the test. It is that we will.


    Wright’s book argues that superintelligence is not the danger and AI alignment is not the solution unless it comes with a moral advance. Passing the God test requires something no lab can ship.


    What you’ll hear:

    -Why Wright thinks p(doom) fails as a scientific concept

    -What the binding of Isaac and the Tower of Babel have in common as moral tests

    -Why global cooperation is the only thing that can actually slow AI down

    -What Lee Smolin’s cosmological natural selection has to do with the Fermi paradox

    -What Wright thinks Eastern and Western enlightenment have in common and why it matters now

    -Whether there is a role for humanity inside the global brain or only for the machines

    “We face the kind of test that God would give.” — Robert Wright


    CHAPTERS

    00:00 The man who interviewed Hinton in 1983

    05:04 The God test and its two meanings

    08:36 Religious faith in technological progress

    14:10 Hinton then versus Hinton now

    19:38 Why slowing AI down requires international cooperation

    26:02 How LLMs reverse-engineer the meaning of words

    32:08 Brian's Einstein test: can Claude have a happy thought?

    40:06 AGI is impossible. Here is why Brian thinks that.

    47:04 The Fermi paradox as a moral filter

    51:10 What passing the God test actually looks like


    Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    Enter the debate: briankeating.com/ai

    Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

    Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

    Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

    Featured Guest:

    The God Test (book): https://thegodtest.net

    Robert Wright on Twitter/X: https://x.com/RWrighter

    My books:

    Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

    Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu

    Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

    Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

    Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

    Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

    Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

    Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast


    #RobertWright #AIalignment #superintelligence #FermiParadox #briankeating #intotheimpossible #AI

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Former NASA Physicist: The UAP Maneuver That Should Have Exploded Sep 27, 2026
    Show notes

    A physics professor ran the energy budget on the Nimitz tic-tac. The maneuver needs about a thousand gigawatts, more than ten times every nuclear plant in the United States combined.

    Nothing we build survives its own waste heat at that scale. So what was flying?

    Kevin Knuth is a professor of physics at the University at Albany and a former NASA scientist who now applies Bayesian statistics to UAP sensor data.

    We cover: why a 5,400 g maneuver would turn a pilot into soup, where the energy went when the object stopped and no explosion followed, the 1954 radar measurements nobody wants to talk about, the New Zealand frigate that went dark and adrift in three seconds, and why the records from that deployment stay classified until 2062.

    Knuth says the power numbers alone rule out human technology. I push back on whether the sensors agree.

    Newsletter, full transcript, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: briankeating.com/aliens

    CHAPTERS

      00:00 Why this field needs gatekeepers
      03:50 How anomalous is anomalous?
      06:40 The UFO photo that was a seagull
      10:40 Radar clocked them at 19 km/s in 1954
      15:00 5,400 g and a body weighing 227 tonnes
      19:00 The radar return problem he had not considered
      21:45 A gigawatt of waste heat and nowhere to put it
      24:30 The 747 chased by something carrier sized
      29:00 Why a number without an error bar is worthless
      34:30 The NASA job he was not qualified for
      37:00 Proxima Centauri in a day and a half
      41:00 The warship that lost all power in 3 seconds
      46:30 Pushing a column of water that cannot compress
      48:45 The light that burned bark off the trees
      53:00 What the power numbers rule out
      56:00 The 95 percent problem

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    Carlo Rovelli: Free Will Is Real. Physics Can Prove It. Sep 22, 2026
    Show notes

    This episode is sponsored by Abacus AI agent: agent.abacus.ai/keating


    I fed it Carlo's recent papers and asked for the argument, the counterargument, and the evidence that would support or refute each side. Some of the questions and animations in this interview came out of that. It runs the top frontier models in one place, turns a dense PDF into a research report or a presentation with charts, builds interactive dashboards off a spreadsheet, and takes API access if you want it wired into your own tools.


    Plans start at $10 a month. My link gets you the first month for $7: agent.abacus.ai/keating


    The physicist who built loop quantum gravity says the second law does not say what you were taught it says, and that freedom does not require breaking a single law of nature. Order builds itself. Your head is older than your feet. And neither one is the strangest thing here.


    Carlo Rovelli founded the loop quantum gravity program and wrote the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics.


    We cover: why oil separating from water is not a violation of entropy, what Galileo got wrong about the one discovery he is most famous for, the paper Einstein published denying gravitational waves, why a chess program that deliberates tells you what your own freedom actually is, and what Rovelli would build with ten years and unlimited money.


    “To imagine that to be free you have to violate the laws of nature is stupid.” — Carlo Rovelli


    CHAPTERS

    00:00 Your head is older than your feet

    00:48 Things left alone get ordered. Who ordered them?

    07:00 Low entropy might be about you, not the universe

    08:38 You can be in two cities at once, just not to you

    11:02 Why start with Galileo when Einstein knew more?

    19:34 Galileo misunderstood his own discovery

    22:32 Einstein published a paper denying gravitational waves

    25:08 The definition of time that explains nothing

    26:50 Two clocks, two metres apart, two answers

    31:06 Nothing gets recorded without something being lost

    33:12 The chess program deliberates. So do you.

    37:06 Can a machine have Einstein’s happiest thought?

    39:52 Thirty minutes versus a month

    44:10 Dark matter made of black holes the size of a hair

    51:10 Ten years, unlimited money, a room full of junctions


    Rovelli told me the second law does not say what I was taught it says. Order builds itself. Transcript, bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt


    Three moments worth the rewatch: 07:00 The entropy you were taught is a point of view 26:50 Why your head is older than your feet 39:52 The thing Claude did in 30 minutes


    Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt


    Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu


    Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1


    Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating


    Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join


    Featured Guest: Carlo Rovelli website: https://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/~rovelli/


    The Relational Universe (book): https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735216118


    Carlo Rovelli on Twitter/X: https://x.com/carlorovelli


    My books: Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un


    Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast


    #CarloRovelli #freewill #entropy #physics #quantumgravity #briankeating #intotheimpossible


    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


    1 2 3 65 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Science Friday

    1

    Science Friday Astronomy
    Radiolab

    2

    Radiolab Documentary
    BrainStuff

    3

    BrainStuff Natural Sciences
    StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson

    4

    StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson Games & Hobbies
    Radiolab

    5

    Radiolab Documentary
    Stuff To Blow Your Mind

    6

    Stuff To Blow Your Mind Life Sciences
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights