Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Latest Episodes:

Why Mario Fernandez's Check To The Gunman Says WHAT Aug 16, 2026

Show notes

A prosecutor stood in court and dropped the one charge that existed because Jared Bridegan's two-year-old daughter was in the car when he was shot. Four days later, that same prosecutor told the judge the state has overwhelming evidence of a conspiracy — and that someone else drove away from the murder scene in a pickup truck. Nobody has been charged with driving it.
That contradiction sits at the center of the Bridegan murder-for-hire trial, which opened in Jacksonville after its star witness upended the case. Henry Tenon confessed to being the gunman and agreed to testify against Mario Fernandez and Shanna Gardner as part of a plea deal. Four years and one day after the shooting, he asked a judge for a trial instead, and prosecutors didn't object.
Fernandez's defense has spent three years cutting into the state's case — half the original charges dropped, the death penalty removed, and a judge blocking testimony under a spousal privilege ruling. Their explanation for the money is simple: checks from a family rental company covered landscaping and roof repairs, and nothing was paid before Bridegan died. One of those checks, for $5,000, allegedly carried the memo "Kickstarter" and "Good luck!"
The state answers with more than three dozen calls between Fernandez and Tenon during the month of the killing, and a jailhouse informant who says Fernandez laid out the conspiracy himself and tried to pin the murder on Jared's widow.
Fernandez has pleaded not guilty. His trial runs August 17 through 28, with Gardner's case and Tenon's own March 2027 date still to come.
LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillers #ShannaGardner #HenryTenon #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #TrueCrime #DuvalCounty #JuryTrial

What Lindsay Clancy's Psychiatrist Missed Twice Aug 16, 2026

Show notes

A psychiatrist testified Lindsay Clancy showed no signs of psychosis. Then it came out she'd missed something twice. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony Brueski to walk through the moment that turned a prosecution witness into a problem for the prosecution itself.
Dr. Jennifer Tufts treated Lindsay through fourteen telehealth sessions over months and never met her in person. She testified without Lindsay's complete medical record. On cross-examination from Kevin Reddington, she admitted she hadn't known Lindsay called a suicide hotline on two separate occasions, and that she'd become board-certified the same day Lindsay filled out her intake paperwork.
Faddis breaks down why the state put Tufts on the stand in the first place — to establish that Lindsay was competent and aware — and why three hours of cross-examination may have accomplished the opposite. The prosecution's broader case leans on Lindsay's actions that day: sending her husband out, timing his errand, and a specific phrase she searched on her phone beforehand, a detail Faddis says the jury will keep coming back to during deliberations.
On the other side, the defense has spent weeks building a picture of a woman on thirteen psychiatric medications, messaging providers almost daily begging for changes, describing intrusive thoughts and brain fog in her own journal. No provider diagnosed postpartum psychosis before her children died. That diagnosis came later, from a forensic psychiatrist retained by the defense.
Faddis lays out what the state has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in Massachusetts, and where its own witness list may be working against it. Three weeks into the trial, both sides are still calling witnesses who cut in unexpected directions and reshape the case in real time.
LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #JenniferTufts #KevinReddington #PostpartumPsychosis #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime #CriminalResponsibility #DuxburyMassachusetts

Why Lindsay Clancy's Doctor Signed Off Anyway Aug 16, 2026

Show notes

Fourteen video appointments. Sessions scheduled for thirty minutes. Lindsay Clancy's outpatient psychiatrist testified about exactly how those sessions worked in the months before her three children died — and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott joins Tony Brueski to explain what that timeline actually means.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder after the children died at home in Duxbury in January 2023. Her defense doesn't dispute that she caused their deaths — it argues postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder left her not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argue she acted with intention and clarity.
Shavaun, a licensed psychotherapist with more than thirty years treating trauma and studying the psychology of violence, breaks down what postpartum psychosis looks like clinically — the gap between an intrusive thought and a voice issuing commands, and why the condition can leave someone looking composed while still being dangerously unwell. Estimates put it at roughly one or two cases per thousand births, typically emerging within weeks of delivery.
The conversation then turns to the providers themselves — the psychiatrist who signed off on Clancy's hospital release, and the outpatient doctor who treated her afterward. What each was later asked on the stand, and how they answered, sits at the center of this episode.
Shavaun also unpacks how Clancy's own background as a labor and delivery nurse may have shaped the way her providers read her — and points to one moment where a provider did right by her, a small detail worth holding onto.
Clancy attempted suicide the same day her children died and now attends her trial in a wheelchair. The record left behind by the people responsible for her care is now part of what a jury has to weigh.
LINKS, DISCLAIMER & HASHTAGS
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #AliaGoodheart #HiddenKillers #JenniferTufts #ShavaunScott #PostpartumPsychosis #ClancyTrial #McLeanHospital #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt

What Alex Murdaugh's Lawyers Claimed About A Polygraph Aug 16, 2026

Show notes

Polygraph results can't be used as evidence in court. That hasn't stopped them from becoming a flashpoint heading into Alex Murdaugh's retrial, after his own attorneys once told a court that Curtis Eddie Smith failed one when asked about the murders of Maggie and Paul. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke take listener questions on why prosecutors are moving to bar the subject entirely.
That motion is part of a larger filing. Prosecutors want a new jury to hear Murdaugh's own 2023 testimony, including his admission that he lied to investigators for roughly eighteen months about being at the kennels the night his wife and son were killed, and his denial of the killings themselves. The state is also renewing a motion to keep third-party guilt evidence from the jury, pushing for a fresh review of digital evidence, and opposing the defense's request for independent DNA testing.
Murdaugh's defense has answered with its own filing: a supplemental Brady and Giglio motion demanding prosecutors search again for favorable evidence generated since the first trial and certify in writing, within thirty days, that the search was complete. Ten categories are listed, covering everything from plea deals to lab proficiency testing, and the motion doesn't name a single witness or document.
Judge Debra McCaslin has tentatively set the retrial for April 5, 2027. Dreeke weighs what the polygraph fight and the certification demand both say about where this case stands. Murdaugh is presumed innocent.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #HiddenKillers #MurdaughRetrial #TrueCrime #SouthCarolina #MurdaughMurders #BradyMotion #DebraMcCaslin #DickHarpootlian

Why Lindsay Clancy's Psychiatrist Couldn't Count Her Own Patients Aug 16, 2026

Show notes

Dr. Alia Goodheart treated Lindsay Clancy at McLean Hospital. On cross-examination, she couldn't say how many patients with postpartum depression she'd seen across twenty years of practice, and acknowledged she doesn't believe she's ever treated a patient with postpartum psychosis at all. Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke take listener questions on what that means for her testimony.
Goodheart, like Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Clancy's outpatient psychiatrist, testified she observed no signs of psychosis and had no idea Clancy called a crisis line twice, calls documented in Clancy's own civil filings. A separate prosecution witness, Dr. Sejal Shah, agreed on cross-examination that a person can communicate and make plans while in a state of psychosis and called Clancy an honest patient.
The conversation also covers Day 10 of the trial, when defense attorney Kevin Reddington spent hours cross-examining Tufts. He established that all fourteen of her appointments with Clancy happened over video, that she never spoke to Clancy's parents, and that she never asked Clancy to sign a release that would have opened her file from a separate perinatal clinic. He pressed her on a 2021 study linking thyroid function to postpartum psychosis she hadn't read and blood testing she declined to order. The prosecution countered that Clancy booked her own appointments and drove herself to an emergency room.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder and is presumed innocent unless the state proves its case. Support is available around the clock at 988.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #JenniferTufts #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #MentalHealthCare #CriminalResponsibility

Could Lindsay Clancy Walk Free After This Verdict? Aug 15, 2026

Show notes

Eight days into Lindsay Clancy's trial, listeners keep asking Tony Brueski the same question: if the jury returns a not-criminally-responsible verdict, could Lindsay actually walk free one day? Tony answers it directly, along with seven more questions pulled straight from the mailbag.
The rest of the set covers the trial's biggest open threads. The takeout order and the errand that reads as a plan to half the audience and as illness to the other half. The pill bottles prosecutors emptied out one by one to argue Lindsay skipped her medication, against a defense built entirely on that same medication. The psychiatric hospital that discharged her nineteen days before her children died. The sobbing that stopped the courtroom cold during the medical examiner's testimony, and prosecution witnesses, including friends, the family's nanny, and even people on Patrick's side, who keep describing Lindsay as a devoted mother from the stand.
This episode also opens Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit, filed in January 2026, which alleges providers misprescribed a stack of psychiatric medications and added new drugs without a coordinated plan behind them. The civil filings count nine medications in Lindsay's final months against thirteen counted by her own criminal defense, and a simple lab test that would have shown whether her body was processing those drugs was never ordered. Lindsay's last psychiatric appointment came the day before her children died. The complaint claims that with adequate care, it's more likely than not they would still be alive.
Two courtrooms, one family, and a verdict in one case that could decide what the other jury ever hears.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #WrongfulDeath #Duxbury #PlymouthCounty #TrialWatch #CrimeNews

Why Alex Murdaugh's Bloody Shirt Can Never Be Retested Aug 15, 2026

Show notes

The white shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the night Maggie and Paul were killed was supposed to settle the question of blood spatter. SLED's own testing came back negative for human blood, then a chemical applied during that testing destroyed the shirt's usability for good. No retest. No second lab. Ever. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer tells Tony Brueski straight whether she buys that as an accident.
That single piece of evidence sits inside a much bigger picture this episode lays out in full. A federal judge dismissed Murdaugh's $600,000 lawsuit against former clerk Becky Hill on August 5, 2026, ruling he'd have paid for his defense regardless of her jury tampering. Hill has pleaded guilty to obstruction, perjury, and misconduct tied to a book photo, self-paid bonuses, and lying about sealed exhibits, and walked away with no prison time.
The same day, Murdaugh's defense filed a Brady motion demanding prosecutors search every file, agency, and personnel record connected to the case and swear in writing that nothing favorable remains hidden. The motion leans on lead investigator David Owen's history: a separate 2015 murder case where a judge quashed the indictment after the state withheld evidence for nearly a decade, and where Owen denied under oath something the victim's mother says she told him directly.
Coffindaffer also addresses agent Ryan Kelly, who told Murdaugh's jury nothing tied alternate suspect Eddie Smith to the murders before he was fired from an unrelated job this year. Judge Debra McCaslin hears arguments August 14, 2026. Murdaugh is presumed innocent heading into his 2027 retrial, and this episode asks whether the investigation deserves that same presumption.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughRetrial #DavidOwen #SLED #SouthCarolina #MurdaughMurders #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul

Patrick Clancy: Would Anything Ever Convince His Critics? Aug 15, 2026

Show notes

Patrick Clancy has a timeline verified by CVS surveillance and phone records. His wife's own attorney told a jury she killed their three children. And a growing internet mob is convinced he's the real killer anyway. Tony Brueski asks retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke a direct question: is there any evidence that would actually satisfy this crowd?
Robin ran the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, and he walks through what's driving the instinct to suspect the husband — the alibi read through a trained investigator's eyes, the way people interpret Patrick's composure on the stand as guilt, and the remarriage three years later that some have turned into a motive.
Then the episode gets specific. NMS Laboratories toxicologist Justin Brower testified to four medications found in Lindsay Clancy's blood. A state trooper's testimony about fingerprints has been misread into a claim it never supported. The interior bedroom lock at the center of one theory only turns one direction. And there's the anniversary phone call — two years old, sitting in plain sight — where Patrick asked his wife the exact question people assume he's avoided.
The remarriage detail didn't leak from a tabloid. Lindsay's own attorney raised it in Plymouth Superior Court and told the judge Patrick had endured one of the worst tragedies a person can survive and was trying to move forward. Nobody with the authority to subpoena a phone record has ever pointed at him.
Robin's answer to what it would take for the online crowd to finally drop the theory is the one worth sticking around for — and it might not be what you'd guess.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #Duxbury #RobinDreeke #TrialWatch #PostpartumPsychosis #ConspiracyTheories

Do Nancy Guthrie's Two Ransom Notes Share The Same Writer? Aug 15, 2026

Show notes

Two ransom notes now exist in the Nancy Guthrie case, released by the Pima County Sheriff's Department on July 31, and they read like they came from two different people. Tony Brueski, retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke, and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer break down why.
The first letter opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and knows specific details inside the house, including a white smart watch on the floor by the bed and a destroyed flood light out back. It reads like a script: deadlines, threats, demands. The second asks for nothing. It claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, that she's buried in nature, and that the writer hopes her children find peace, and it reads like someone who was actually inside that house, apologizing.
The financial trail adds another layer. Coffindaffer's trace of the alleged kidnapper's Bitcoin wallet shows the only funds that ever arrived were roughly three hundred dollars, sent by the FBI itself, and untouched since February 10. No ransom was ever paid, which contradicts Savannah Guthrie's own public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to that wallet include the exact words Savannah said on camera, meaning a line to whoever controls it has existed the entire time and gone unanswered.
Six months into the case, Sheriff Nanos calls his relationship with the FBI great while thousands of hours of video sit unreviewed, and search teams have returned to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Hear the full breakdown of both notes and the money trail behind them.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Lindsay Clancy Trial: The Prosecution, the Defense, and the TikTok Mob Aug 15, 2026

Show notes

Three weeks of testimony in the Lindsay Clancy trial have created three separate stories. Inside the courtroom, the prosecution's witnesses keep helping the defense — the nanny, the pediatrician, and Patrick Clancy himself all described a loving mother falling apart. The prosecution's psychiatrist admitted she never met Lindsay in person across fourteen sessions.

The defense has conceded Lindsay killed her children and is arguing postpartum psychosis. Reddington has dismantled every provider on the stand and told the jury Lindsay heard voices that day. The psychosis diagnosis came after the crime, from a forensic psychiatrist.

Outside the courtroom, TikTok creators have built a conspiracy theory accusing Patrick of being the real killer. They're comparing him to Chris Watts. They're treating his remarriage as evidence. Both sides in the courtroom agree Lindsay did it.

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down the prosecution's case, the defense's strategy, and whether Patrick Clancy has any legal recourse against the creators who are accusing him of murder on platforms with millions of viewers.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected