TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Hobbies

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    Starting in the wonderful hobby of Amateur or HAM Radio can be daunting and challenging but can be very rewarding. Every week I look at a different aspect of the hobby, how you might fit in and get the very best from the 1000 hobbies that Amateur Radio represents. Note that this podcast started in 2011 as “What use is an F-call?“.

    Advertise

    Copyright: ℗ & © 2015 - 2020 Onno Benschop

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Planning and making lemonade Jun 25, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    The other weekend there was an amateur radio contest on. Not surprising if you realise that's true for most weekends. For a change, I knew about this contest before it started, because I missed out a year ago, so I did the smart thing to add it to my diary with an alert a month out.

    In this particular contest there's points to be made by being a so-called roving station, that is, one that moves around during the contest and in the past that's how I've participated and had lots of fun. So the die was cast and a plan was concocted.

    Being a rover meant that I would be outfitting my car with my radio. It's been out of the car for several years, taken out when we had the transmission replaced, and never actually returned. I started making lists of everything I'd need, including learning that you can use a bench top power supply to charge a 12V battery if your trusty charger has let the smoke out. I went hunting for the cable that connects the front of the radio to the back and realised that it was still in the car, so I could cross that off my checklist.

    I decided for the first time that realistically I could log using paper and save myself the heartache of finding a computer with a suitable battery and matching software, especially since I'd be operating with low power so making a gazillion contacts wasn't going to be a problem.

    I went to the shops to get some road food, in my case I like to bring water and oatmeal bars which keep me going through the night. One change was that the contest only ran for 24 hours, leaving less time for sleep.

    I found my portable antenna tuner, plugged everything in, configured the radio for remote tuning, and tested it all on the bench in my shack.

    In further preparation I packed my food, got a headlamp out, spare batteries, a pen and a spare, a ring binder for logging and my wristwatch to keep track of logging times.

    The day before the contest I parked the car in the sun, extracted all the cables from behind the backseat, installed the radio, the battery, the head, the suction mount, the microphone, the speaker, the antenna tuner and antenna mount, and got everything where I wanted it.

    In between rain showers I located the ropes I use to keep the antenna from breaking off the car when I'm driving, set it all up to length after hunting through the garage to find my multi-tap antenna to suit. Strapped that all together to the handhold in the cabin with a Velcro strap and called it a day.

    The next morning I drove to my first activation location, installed the antenna on the 40m band, turned on the radio, tuned it, and called CQ Contest. Made my first contact about six minutes after I started. I was excited. Drove to the next location, made the next contact six minutes later. On a roll I drove to my third spot, where things came unstuck.

    I spent the next two hours getting nothing. I changed both location and band, setting the antenna to 15m and after initially tuning once I couldn't get it to tune again. I spent an hour trying. Given that I wasn't far from home, I went back for a break and to pick up one piece of equipment that I should have packed when I started, my antenna analyser.

    I tested the antenna and for reasons I still don't understand, it was only resonant on 19 MHz, not much good if you're trying to tune somewhere on 21 MHz.

    I moved back to my first spot and changed to the 10m band. Three hours to the minute after my second contact, I made another one, this one outside the state.

    By this time it had been raining steadily for four hours, despite a forecast of little or no rain. The car was stuffy, no way to open the window and stay dry, no contacts, no fun. I asked myself why I was doing this and decided that I'd learnt a valuable lesson and packed up and went home.

    I did go out later in the afternoon to provide some moral support to a friend who had made double the three contacts I'd made, but by dusk we had both had enough.

    My lesson for this week? Test the antenna before you go out and bring your analyser. I must add that I've been contesting for years and I've always packed the analyser but never ever needed it. This time I didn't and Murphy let me know that anything that can happen, will.

    It might sound like a dejected wet cat story, but I learnt a valuable lesson and now I've got another challenge, to discover just why my trusty antenna stopped working. If I do find out I'll let you know.

    What unexpected lessons have you learnt of late?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Where is your community and how resilient is it? Jun 18, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    During the week, prompted by a protest on popular social media site Reddit, I rediscovered that there are other places to spend time. It sounds absurd now, but until then much of my social interaction with the world was via a single online presence. This didn't happen overnight. Over the years more and more of my time was spent on Reddit engaging with other humans around topics of my interest, amateur radio being one of them.

    As you might know, I'm the host of a weekly net, F-troop. It's an on-air radio discussion for new and returning amateurs that's been running since 2011 and you can join in every Saturday for an hour at midnight UTC.

    In addition to the net, there's an online component. It captures items of interest shared during the on-air conversation. It's intended to stop the need to read out web addresses on-air, create a historic record of the things we talk about and allow people who are not yet amateurs to explore the kinds of things that capture our interest.

    Since 2014, F-troop online was a website that I maintained. After the announced demise of the service in 2020 I explored dozens of alternatives and landed on the idea to move to Reddit, which happened in March of 2021.

    At the time of selecting Reddit as the successor to the website, I wanted to create a space where anyone could add content and discuss it, rather than rely on a single individual, me, to update the website every time something was mentioned. During the net these days you'll often hear me ask a person to post that on Reddit.

    This to illustrate, at a small scale, how the F-troop community shares its knowledge with each other and the wider community.

    With the realisation that there are other places to spend time, comes an uneasy feeling about how we build our online communities, and how resilient they really are.

    Before the Internet our amateur radio community talked on-air, or in person at club meetings, or shared their interests in a magazine, or wrote letters. Today we congregate online in many different communities. If one of those fails or loses favour, finding those people elsewhere can be challenging, especially if those communities prefer anonymity.

    For quite some time now I have been thinking about how to build a radio amateur specific online community. The issues to surface, address and overcome are wide and varied. I created a list ... hands up if you're surprised ... I will point out that I'm sure it's incomplete, your additions and comments are welcome.

    Funding is the first item to consider. All of this costs time and money. Amateurs are notorious for their deep pockets and short arms, but they're no different from much of humanity. If this community needs to endure, it needs to be financially sustainable from the outset.

    Authentication and Identity is the next priority. If it's for amateurs, how do you verify and enforce that and what happens if an amateur decides not to renew their callsign, do they stop being an amateur? Should this community be anonymous or not?

    Moderation and Content is next on the list. What types of content are "permitted"? What is the process to regulate and enforce it?

    Is this forum public and accessible via a search engine, or private? Can people who are not yet amateurs benefit from the community and use it to learn?

    How do you set rules of conduct and how do you update them? How do you deal with rule infractions and how do you scale that?

    Who is this for? Is it decentralised across each callsign prefix, across a DXCC entity, or based on some other selection criteria?

    Can you have more than one account, or only one per person, or one per callsign?

    What about machine accounts, like a local beacon, repeater, solar battery, radio link, propagation skimmer or other equipment?

    What about bots and APIs? If that doesn't mean anything, a bot, short for robot, is a piece of software that can do things, like mark content as being Not Safe For Work, or NSFW, or it could enforce rules, or look-up callsigns, or share the latest propagation forecast or check for duplicates, scale an image, convert Morse code, check for malicious links, or anything you might want in an online community. The way a program like a bot, or a mobile client, or a screen reader, or a desktop application talks to the community is using an API, or an Application Programming Interface.

    Incidentally, the protest at Reddit is about starting to charge for access to the API, something which will immediately affect software developers and eventually the entire Reddit community, even if many don't yet realise this.

    What about system backups and availability? How seriously are we taking this community? Is there going to be a Service Level Agreement, or are we going to run it on a best-effort basis? How long is it acceptable for your community to be inaccessible?

    What about content archiving and ageing? Do we keep everything forever, do we have an archive policy? What happens if a topic that's permitted one year isn't permitted a year later?

    And those are just to start the discussion.

    There are plenty of options for places to start building another community, but will they last more than a couple of years, or be subject to the same effects that a Coronal Mass Ejection causes on HF propagation, being wildly random and immensely disruptive?

    At the moment I'm exploring an email list as a place to store our F-troop data and I intend to discuss archiving it in the Digital Library of Amateur Radio and Communications.

    Where is your online community and how resilient is it really?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    What is our legacy? Jun 11, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    Our hobby has been around for over a century. The Wireless Institute of Australia, or WIA, is the oldest amateur association on the globe, having just marked 113 years since formation. The American Radio Relay League, or ARRL, is four years younger, founded in 1914.

    I'm mentioning these two associations because they documented their journey through many of the years since foundation. The ARRL has published QST magazine since 1915 and the WIA has published Amateur Radio Magazine since 1933.

    Before the Internet and the Digital Library of Amateur Radio and Communications, magazines like QST and AR Magazine were some ways of documenting and archiving achievements across our community.

    If you find my professional biography online, you'll read: Experienced polyglot IT professional, software developer, trouble shooter, researcher, public speaker, educator, writer and publisher, founder and small business owner, podcaster, and licensed radio amateur.

    It's fair to say that I've done a great many things across the technology arena. I have been writing software since before I was a teenager. At the time we used words like freeware and shareware, we copied lines of BASIC from the pages of the latest computer magazine, or recorded the TV teletext signal to access a programme. I recall typing pages of hexadecimal codes and running the result. Very satisfying to make sprites running across your screen.

    In the decades since, technology has moved on. I've had a front-row seat to see that evolution happen. I've also witnessed one of the victims of the 1980's computer craze, the fundamental obliteration of its history. Much has been lost, either physically by destruction or disposal of boxes of magazines or the deterioration of audio cassette tapes once used to store software. I hold a Guinness World Record of Endurance Computing, set in 1989 during the Hobby Computer Club days, but you'll not find it anywhere other than a copy of the Dutch World Records that might be somewhere in my garage, or not. The twice-daily magazine we published over the three days of the event, Elephant News, was lost to time.

    I'm mentioning this because this loss is not limited to the 1980's, it's happening here, today. As our hobby evolves into the software realm, we need to consider just how that legacy continues beyond our own lifetime. For example, we have lost access to the fundamentals of how exactly HAM DRM works, we've lost the source for VK Contest Logger to name another, and the collected designs by so-called antenna guru L.B. Cebik W4RNL (SK) are scattered around the Internet, but as far as I know, none of it is complete.

    Fortunately we have tools at our disposal to keep our history. As I mentioned, the Digital Library of Amateur Radio and Communications or DLARC is an Internet Archive project to catalogue and store current and historic amateur media. In the 30 weeks since starting in October 2022, it now has 75,000 items and continues to grow under the expert stewardship of Program Manager, Special Collections, Kay, K6KJN.

    The DLARC is not the only tool at our disposal and documentation isn't the only way we share technology in our hobby. More and more of what we do is based around software. We use programs to process signals, to generate and receive different modes, to create logs, to model antennas, to log propagation, and that list grows daily.

    One of the most significant changes in software since my childhood is that of the introduction of Open Source Software in 1998. I've spoken about this several times before and I recently pointed at Not1MM as an example of an Open Source contest logger, but that is not the only project available.

    If you visit GitHub.com and search for "amateur radio", you'll discover over a thousand projects showing a healthy ecosystem of activity from people like Daniel EA4GPZ who shared gr-satellites, a collection of telemetry decoders that support many different amateur satellites.

    You'll find APRSdroid by Georg D01GL, which allows radio amateurs to view and report locations using the APRS network.

    There's an Arduino based rotator interface by Anthony K3NG, an advanced ham radio logger called CQRLOG by Petr OK2CQR, a radio modem by Dan KF7IJB, remoteAudio by Tobias DH1TW, and the list goes on.

    I must also point out that I'm only naming the person behind the repository because as is the whole point of Open Source software, anyone can contribute in different ways. You can make a copy of the source-code and write your own version, a so-called fork, or you can create trouble-tickets to explain a bug or problem, there's ways of contributing fixes and ideas and all of that can be done by anyone anywhere. Many of the projects I've just shared are a combination of years of effort by many different people.

    And that is the point of this conversation. Amateur Radio is a collaborative affair. We learn and share from the experience of others. We document how we built a schematic, or an antenna, or managed to achieve some feat and share that with the rest of the community.

    It's not limited to hobbyist projects either. I purchased my Analog Devices ADALM-Pluto SDR hardware specifically because it was Open Source and came with all manner of tools and code that I could tease apart, improve on and change to my own requirements.

    As we make more and more use of technology in our hobby, we run the risk of repeating the mistakes of the 1980's if we don't start making our efforts public and accessible to the community at large.

    Imagine what our hobby would look like if we stopped sharing our successes and failures.

    So, next time you want to look at some software to use, a calculator to build, or a thing you've learnt, consider what a technology appropriate way to share that might be.

    What tools do you use today and how many of them are Open Source? How much of what you do is accessible to others and what happens if you stop paying for the hosting fees on your website?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Accolades in Amateur Radio? Jun 04, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    Today I'd like to start with saying thank you to the Wireless Institute of Australia for awarding me the Brenda Edmonds Education Award "in recognition of outstanding service in the education of the Amateur Radio Community and advancement of licensees."

    It's an unexpected honour and a thrill that leads me to a question about how we recognise the people around us.

    Over the years I've been a member of around a dozen radio amateur clubs and associations. To my recollection, the only one who has ever said thanks, and in my case, more than once, is the Wireless Institute of Australia.

    What of the other clubs? What about the clubs you're a member of, or the groups you meet-up, either for lunch or on the local repeater? What about when you go out on a field-day and set-up a barbecue?

    I look around me and I see activity that goes back more than a century. It's fair to say that every member of the community benefits from that effort. Memes on social media notwithstanding, there is real labour and toil, love and heartbreak, success and failure all around you.

    What process do you have in place to say thanks?

    Now before you start handing out participation trophies to everyone who turns up, mind you, they did when others didn't, consider what saying thanks might look like in your community?

    It could be a special QSL card, or a certificate sent in the mail that someone could hang on their wall. I'm not advocating for sending out monetary awards or trophies, or other such paraphernalia, I'm just asking you to consider who in your group is worthy of a thank you and what that might look like.

    You should also think about what you're saying thank you about. Is it for output, for the number of laughs, the level of participation, how many new club members were signed up, how many contacts someone made, how much fund raising they achieved, how many radios they fixed or how many nets they hosted, or something else?

    You can think about who in your community might serve as an example to strive for and name the award after them. It might be someone who is active right now, or it might be someone who has attained mythical status in the stories you tell each other around the campfire during an overnight activity.

    No matter what you call it, what it's for, how often you award it, what you present and whom you present it to, consider that it's a formal way of saying thank you, from the group to the individual, from all of you to one person in particular.

    Since starting F-troop, I've now hosted more than 600 weekly nets for new and returning amateurs, a feat which we recently celebrated with a morning breakfast on the local aptly named Wireless Hill, but I couldn't have done it without the local repeater group who maintains the repeater we use. I also couldn't have done it without the countless individuals who join in every week, or who quietly sit on the sidelines making sure that the various nodes scattered around the globe are up and running, or the people who did the catering and logistics for the event.

    Looking back, for me that event represents a missed opportunity to say thank you, something which I intend to do something about in the near future.

    So, ask yourself. When was the last time someone in your community received a thank-you for their contribution?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    A Linux contest logger ... May 28, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    As you might know I'm in the process of building a cross-platform, open source, contest logger. Right now that project is at the stage where there is a proof of concept that you can use and install as a progressive web app on any web browser. It's intended as a starting point for discussion. Note that this is a long way from the stage where you might want to actually use it for any contest, it's not feature complete and if it breaks you get to keep both parts. It's currently cunningly named "contest-logger". No doubt that will change.

    I'm collecting suggestions for features using the GitHub issue tracker, which you're welcome to contribute to. Behind the scenes, I'm writing the documentation that describes how I want to actually develop and design this application. What kinds of things are important, what will drive the process, all the planning stuff that sets up the project. Of course I'm doing this whilst writing articles, looking for work and dealing with the health-care fun and games associated with being alive.

    While my project is nowhere near finished, truth be told, it really needs to start first, I've come across a different tool written by a fellow amateur Michael K6GTE.

    This tool is written for Linux only in Python and is in Beta release at this point. This means that you can install and run the application and most of the functionality works.

    The application is called Not1MM.

    Here's what Michael has to say about his efforts:

    Not1MM's interface is a blatant ripoff of N1MM. It's NOT N1MM and any problem you have with this software should in no way reflect on their software.

    If you use Windows you should run away from this and use some other program.

    I personally don't. While it may be possible to get N1MM working under Wine, I haven't checked, I'd rather not have to jump through the hoops.

    Currently this exists for my own personal amusement. Something to do in my free time. While I'm not watching TV, Right vs Left political 'News' programs, mind numbing 'Reality' TV etc...

    Michael goes on to say that:

    The current state is "BETA". I've used it for a few contests, and was able to work contacts and submit a cabrillo at the end. I'm not a "Contester". So I'll add contests as/if I work them. I'm only one guy, so if you see a bug let me know. I don't do much of any Data or RTTY operating. This is why you don't see RTTY in the list of working contests. The Lord helps those who burn people at the... I mean who help themselves. Feel free to fill in that hole with a pull request.

    You can find Not1MM on Michael's GitHub repository ready for your testing and experimentation. It's also available as a PyPi package if you're already familiar with Python.

    In my opinion, one thing that this tool does well is consider how contest logging can be customised for individual contests and likely it will serve as inspiration for how I intend to implement the plugins in my own project.

    I've also submitted a patch to Not1MM so you can use Docker to install it on your own machine or at least see what the requirements are to make it run in your environment.

    I'm thrilled to have discovered this tool and hope that it solves some of your contest logging issues on your Linux workstation.

    What features are you hanging out for in your contest logging adventures? Feel free to share your bug reports and feature requests to either Michael's project, or mine, or both.

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Considering the language of our community ... May 21, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    A curious thing happens when you become part of the amateur community, you start to talk like an amateur. This phenomenon isn't specific to being a radio amateur, it happens whenever you join any community. Lead by example, one word at a time, you start to inherit a vocabulary that represents that community. Amateur radio, rife with acronyms and so-called Q-Codes, a standardised set of three-letter codes that start with the letter "Q", does this in spades.

    If you've been around amateurs for more than 30 seconds, it's likely that you have already heard QSL, QTH and QRM, colloquially short for "Yup", "Home" and "Noise". There's an official meaning if you're keen. You can use the three letters as both a question and an answer, so QSL can mean "Can you acknowledge receipt?" and "I am acknowledging receipt."

    Similarly, QTH means "What is your position in latitude and longitude (or according to any other indication)?" and QRM means "Is my transmission being interfered with?"

    In those cases, used either with Morse code or Voice, they can make getting the message across simpler, faster, and more accurate, all important aspects of communication. It's easier to get QTH across to an amateur who doesn't speak English as their first language than it is to ask the whole question.

    Other letter groups also creep into common language of an amateur. You've likely heard the letters: "XYL", but if you haven't, let me explain. Given that amateur radio is an activity dominated by men, "YL" refers to Young Lady and "XYL", refers to eX-Young Lady, a less than complimentary way of referring to one's wife.

    I'd like to point out something curious.

    In Morse code, XYL is sent using: -..- -.-- .-..

    It's intended to represent the word WIFE which is sent in Morse code as: .-- .. ..-. .

    Now, if you know anything about Morse, you'll know that a dit is one unit, a dah is three. Individual elements are spaced by one unit. The space between letters is three units and the space between words is seven units.

    Armed with that knowledge, XYL takes 39 units and WIFE takes 31 units to send.

    So, sending the shortcut actually takes longer and it's clear that this choice is not about efficiency. Describing someone as an eX-Young Lady to refer to your Significant Other seems very 1950's to me. In the situation where you are the female amateur operator, the apparently appropriate way to refer to your Significant Other is as Old Man or "OM". Are female operators supposed to refer to themselves as YL or XYL? Really?

    Sexism aside, this is extremely offensive in a same-sex and gender fluid community.

    Then there's the symbol "88", apparently meant to refer to "Hugs and Kisses", not something I'd feel comfortable sending to anyone other than my partner who is emphatically not an amateur, let alone the idea that it would be appropriate to send it to any random station or the connotations around males sending such a message to a random female operator.

    So, given that we now live in the 21st century and we're no longer in 1950, perhaps it's time to consider what language we teach new amateurs.

    One proposal by Chris M0YNG is to refer to the Operator as "OP" and the Significant Other as "SO". Seems like a good start.

    I will point out that this conversation was brought to my attention by Andreas DJ3EI who was participating in a Mastodon.radio conversation with Tim N7KOM who started the thread.

    I think it's a worthwhile thing to discuss such an evolution of our language, it goes to the heart of our community, you are what you say you are, and words matter.

    So, what words, acronyms and symbols do you use in your amateur community and what are you teaching new amateurs?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Measuring the Solar Flux Index at home ... May 14, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    Recently the Australian Space Weather Forecasting Centre issued an alert for a Coronal Mass Ejection or CME expected to impact Earth within 24 to 36 hours. This was presented within the context of seeing the resulting Aurora, but as a user of the HF radio spectrum, I'm subscribed to their email list, not for the pretty pictures, though I would be delighted to actually see them with my mark one eyeball, I'm on the list for the impact on propagation for my hobby.

    As a good citizen I shared the alert with my community both via email and social media and as a result I received some questions and comments. One question was, "What does this mean?", one comment was "it's not going to impact the United States."

    My response was to point out that HF propagation and the impact of the Sun is a very deep rabbit hole and encouraged further research by supplying several links, including a very detailed video by Rohde and Schwarz titled "Understanding HF Propagation", very, highly, recommended.

    Whilst watching that video I discovered that the Solar Flux Index is measured using a receiver tuned to 2800 MHz or 2.8 GHz. Being in the business of having receivers scattered around my shack, I asked myself if I had something that was able to receive on that frequency. My RTL-SDR dongle doesn't cut it without extra hardware, it tops out at 1.75 GHz. However, my PlutoSDR has a standard frequency range that goes up to 3.8 GHz out - of the box - and with some tweaks can make it to 6 GHz, so well and truly within range.

    Now, before I move on, I should mention that an RTL-SDR is a cheap, as-in $20, USB computer accessory that looks like a thumb-drive and is ostensibly built to receive digital television, or DVB-T signals. I've spoken about this previously. It can be used to receive radio frequencies outside the purpose it was built for. The PlutoSDR, or to give its official name the ADALM-PLUTO, on the other hand, something which I've also spoken about, is a single board Linux computer made by some smart people at Analog Devices, specifically for the purposes of learning and experimentation with receiving and transmitting RF. It comes with all manner of documentation and software and to be honest, I'm a little bit in love with mine.

    Back to measuring stuff. In this case I'm attempting to measure the power levels of radio frequencies at 2.8 GHz. I know of a simple tool called rtl_power that can measure RF power over time and started investigating if that tool had been hacked to be able to use the PlutoSDR, rather than the RTL-SDR dongle. It might have been, but I've not yet discovered it, however, that in turn led me to several other tools, most of which I'm still investigating.

    What it does tell me is that I'm not the first person to tread these paths, much has happened and been documented in the analogue sphere, some has been done using digital I/Q data and a transverter, a device that can multiply radio frequencies to make them appear in a different part of the radio spectrum, but I'm not yet sure if anyone has made a Solar Flux Index device out of a PlutoSDR.

    I recalled a wonderful little tool that I've also talked about before, there's a theme here, I'm sure, but the tool, "csdr", written by Andras HA7ILM, which allows you to do all manner of interesting things to a stream of raw data, specifically RF raw data. It has a function called logpower_cf which Andras describes as "useful for drawing power spectrum graphs", which is precisely what I'm looking for.

    Armed with that I'm now in the process of building a compiled version using Docker, so I can run csdr on my PlutoSDR and perhaps generate a power spectrum graph for 2.8 GHz. Of course that will now require that I learn how to extract raw data, known as I/Q data from the PlutoSDR command-line, process it through the logpower_cf function, output an image and hopefully show the result as a web-page. At the moment I'm still in the weeds with a Makefile, but that's not unusual.

    Needless to say that I'm working on it and the result will no doubt turn up on my github page when it's done. In the most innocent terms possible, how hard can it be?

    One takeaway that really needs to be expressed out loud, even if I've hinted at it. All the bits I've talked about here are things I've already been playing with. It wasn't until I came across a salient piece of information about the Solar Flux Index and how it was measured that all the puzzle pieces came together, the PlutoSDR, csdr, rtl-power, logpower_cf, the SFI and a web-server, that I could even imagine this happening.

    The point being that even if you have all of the puzzle pieces in your hands, it might still take one missing piece of information for your brain to go "Ah-ha, wow, yes, this makes sense, I can do this."

    So, keep collecting puzzle pieces, relevant to your own interests and one day you too will get to this point.

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Propagation during the 2023 Solar Eclipse May 07, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    On Thursday the 20th of April, 2023 at 04:17:56 UTC the world was subjected to a rare event, a hybrid solar eclipse. In Perth I experienced a partial eclipse and people lucky enough to be directly in line, places like Ningaloo Reef, Exmouth and Barrow Island, experienced a total eclipse. Timor-Leste had the experience of the peak total eclipse.

    At the time I went into my shack and refreshed the WSPR or Weak Signal Propagation Reporter beacon map I have open and noticed that my beacon wasn't reported. I sagely nodded my head, that makes sense, no Sun, no propagation and I got on with my life.

    Last week a fellow amateur, Will VK6UU, asked if anyone had any VK6 specific HF propagation reports to make. Being the data geek that I am, I thought to myself, "Aha! I can do some data analytics on the WSPR dataset that I have." So, the die was cast for a few enjoyable hours of importing 2.4 gigabytes of compressed data into a database and constructing a set of SQL queries to see what I could learn.

    Before getting stuck in, I spent a few hours thinking about the problem. How could I go about doing this? Propagation information is notoriously fickle. You have to consider the obvious things like the Solar Index and the Geomagnetic Index which vary considerably. Then there's the nature of the various reports themselves. Not everyone has their beacon on all the time, not everyone has their receiver on all the time. Weekends are more popular than weekdays and popularity overall is growing exponentially. The solar cycle is on the way to its peak, so there's that variation to consider and if that's not enough, how should you compare the Signal To Noise ratio between weak and strong beacons?

    With all that in hand I set about constructing a plan. I created a folder to hold my charts and SQL queries, intent on uploading that to GitHub when the work was done.

    For my very first test I thought I'd count the number of reports per band in a 24 hour window around the eclipse. I imported all the WSPR records that had a VK6 callsign, either as the transmitter or the receiver, given that I was interested in learning if stations transmitting from VK6 could be heard elsewhere and inversely, could VK6 stations hear any other stations?

    As my first effort, I created a scatter-plot to get a sense of what kind of numbers I was looking at. The initial result was interesting. Around the eclipse itself there was no propagation. This wasn't unexpected, since that's what I'd seen on the day at the time on my own map. I changed my data to use a cumulative count per band to see if any band was particularly different and then discovered that there was no propagation at all, on any band.

    That seemed ... odd.

    So, I had a look at the source data and discovered a gap, which accounted for what my chart was showing. I added a fake record for the eclipse time itself, just so I could see where on the chart this gap was. Turns out that for VK6 stations, the gap is just over five hours, but it's not centred around the eclipse. There's a four hour window before the eclipse and a one hour window after it.

    Then I started looking at all the reports from across the world. To give you a sense of scale, across April 2023 the dataset has nearly 139 million rows. It's 12 gigabytes in size. By contrast, in March of 2008 when the first reports started, there were just over 93 thousand reports in a 7 megabyte file. Charting this shows exponential growth, hitting a million reports in July of 2009, 10 million reports in January 2016 and 100 million reports in October of 2021.

    So, the eclipse and global propagation. The results came in and the reports are that there was no propagation, on any band at any point during the just under two hours and 12 minutes before the eclipse and the 38 minutes following it.

    That ... or the WSPRnet.org database was down during the eclipse.

    So, unfortunately I cannot tell you what propagation was like during the eclipse, since it appears that those records don't exist.

    Looks like we'll have to wait until 2031 when we can try this again. We'll all be a little older and wiser by that time and perhaps we can come up with a way to ensure that the global central WSPR data server is running without downtime, scaled to match the growing requirements and paid for by a benevolent organisation with deep pockets.

    I did start considering making lemonade from my lemons and charting the kinds of down time the WSPR server has, but just looking over the various discussion groups showed that this is going to be painful. On the plus side, I learnt about SUM OVER and LAG functions in SQL, so there's that.

    I must confess that if we're going to seriously use WSPR as a propagation analysis tool we need to fix these kinds of issues. I have no doubt that running WSPRnet.org is a massive enterprise and that it costs real time and money to make that happen.

    So, who's up for the challenge and will the real owner of WSPRnet.org please raise their hand?

    Finally, if by chance you were running a WSPR receiver during the 2023 Solar eclipse you might want to consider looking at sharing your logs, since they're potentially the only record still remaining.

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Doing the same thing over and over again ... Apr 30, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    Over the years I've used the phrase, which I shamelessly stole, that amateur radio is a thousand hobbies in one. I've discussed countless different activities and adventures that all fall under the banner of amateur radio, in one way or another.

    Since becoming a licensed radio amateur I've had the opportunity to speak with many different amateurs and hear their views on what amateur radio means to them. Based on their responses I've often found myself exploring new aspects of the hobby and discovering new and interesting ways to participate in this community.

    Recently I put together a list of projects that are currently underway in my shack. I discovered that over time this list has evolved from physical radio activities, like portable activations, building antennas, camping, and going to HAMfests, the amateur radio version of a swap meet, into more computer related things like data analytics, writing software, fixing bugs and learning how the insides of a Software Defined Radio works.

    That's not to say that I've given up on camping, or any of the other things, just that my priorities have shifted over time as I discover over and over again, just how big this hobby really is.

    I mention this because one of the recurring observations I encounter is that others are doing the same thing day in and day out. That in and of itself isn't an issue, it's that they begin to describe that they're bored, that they've lost interest, that the hobby is in stagnation, that there's nothing new, that they're frustrated with their progress towards whatever goal they've set themselves.

    For me, the key motivator in this hobby is learning. Everything else follows from there. That might not be your thing. You might be here for the emergency service aspect, or the hill climbing, the soldering and electronics.

    It really doesn't matter why you're here at all. What keeps it fresh is trying new things. For example, if you're here for emergencies, have you set up a disaster event simulation in your community, or attempted to set-up your station 100 km from home and make contacts, using just the very basics?

    If you're into soldering and electronics, have you ever designed your own circuit board, had it manufactured, or even manufactured it yourself, built the project and tested it? What about documenting it and making it available as a project for someone else?

    If you've climbed all the hills in your state, have you tried doing this across the border, or overseas? What about testing with different antennas, or modes, power levels or logging tools?

    The point being that it's easy to keep doing the same thing. What's harder, but potentially more rewarding, is to try something new and experience what happens.

    One thing to keep in mind is that things will go wrong. That's where all the learning happens, so keep at it.

    So, are you doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome, or are you excited like a newborn puppy, wagging your tail ready for the next adventure?

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Why is radio regulated? Apr 23, 2023
    Show notes

    Foundations of Amateur Radio

    One of the more perplexing things is the nature of radio regulation. If you're a licensed radio amateur, you'll be familiar with this idea, but if you're not it's bewildering and apparently absurd.

    To explain, let me start with a light bulb that your neighbour put on their back porch. It's bright. It's pointing at your house. Like the apparent radiation from a gazillion suns it lights up the bedroom and sleep is hard to come by. Pretty annoying right?

    As it happens, radio is a lot like that. If you know physics, it's exactly like that, but I'll ignore that for today.

    In our modern world we have many different radios that each rely on a specific, let's call it colour, of light. In radio terms this is known as frequencies or radio bands and the entire collection is known as the radio spectrum. You've likely seen this without knowing. Your 2.4 GHz WiFi has an in-built frequency, 2.4 GHz, as does your 5 GHz WiFi. Your FM radio in the car has frequencies as well, 97.7 on the dial indicates 97.7 MHz. If you have an AM radio, 720 AM refers to 720 kHz.

    Hidden in plain sight is why radio is regulated. Those numbers, 5 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 97.7 MHz and 720 kHz are all radio frequencies, or as I suggested, colours. Now imagine turning on a really bright light in the middle of that. All of a sudden your WiFi, FM and AM are wiped out.

    It doesn't stop there. As I said, there are many different radios, and sources of radio frequencies.

    Radio transmissions come from your mobile phone, Bluetooth headset, microwave oven, computer, television, remote control, key-less fob, power supply, car, power meter, solar panel, battery charger, LED light bulb, and the list goes on. Essentially anything electronic has a radio component. Some of these are transmitting unintentionally, like an electric motor or a switch mode power supply. Other things are transmitting on purpose, your microwave oven, your Bluetooth headset and your mobile phone.

    As I mentioned, they're all sharing the same resource, the radio spectrum.

    At this point you might ask about the impact of a single transmitter among all that.

    Well, there are a few phenomena that you should know about.

    Radio waves don't stop. They keep going. There's no boundary. To illustrate that, I have a tiny beacon, a transmitter, that every two minutes sends out a signal that shows my amateur callsign and location. It uses 10 milliwatts. To give you a sense of scale. A typical incandescent light bulb is about 60 Watts. My transmitter uses sixty thousand times less power. It has been heard 13,455 km away, about a third of the way around the planet. I will point out that different frequencies can be absorbed differently depending on how they're used, but you cannot rely on the idea that any radio frequency stops anywhere.

    Another phenomenon is a thing called harmonics. Radio waves not only share the same space or spectrum, they're related to each other. Unless you take very specific precautions, a transmission made at 100 MHz, will be heard at 200 MHz, 300 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz and so-on. While each of those transmissions gets progressively weaker, they still exist. Now imagine that someone else is using one of those other frequencies to communicate emergency information. It's like their backyard just got hit with a bright light.

    To give you a specific example of why this can matter. Consider a radio amateur who uses 7 MHz. This is a licensed amateur radio frequency. Unless that amateur takes specific precautions, the 16th harmonic for 7 MHz is 112 MHz. If that doesn't mean anything to you, it's in the middle of the so-called air-band, frequencies used by aircraft around the planet to talk to each other and the ground. Very bad things could happen if safeguards weren't made.

    As a result, radio is highly controlled and regulated. I'm not going into the laws or legalese here, given that this is a global phenomenon and the rules in their specifics are different in each country. There's a whole hierarchy of regulation, arrived at by international cooperation and agreement.

    These regulations are not identical in each country, far from it. Each country has their interpretation of the rules and balances those with its own use of radio. For example WiFi, a very popular use of the radio spectrum, can be bamboozling in the endless variation of something so seemingly simple.

    Most of this is invisible to most people. You go to the store and buy a WiFi base station and you go on your way. With the advent of online shopping, you can click "buy" on any window, regardless of which country the device comes from. If you're not careful your shiny new device, imported from somewhere is actually illegal in your country and fines and punishment can be severe.

    If you start digging into this, you'll come across rules that for example say that you cannot change the antenna on a particular device. This is because the transmission power of the hardware is strictly regulated so it doesn't interfere with other users. Changing an antenna has the potential to change a number of aspects of your device. It can potentially amplify harmonics that were suppressed by the existing antenna. It could increase the perceived power level and overload other receivers. On a shared frequency it might lock out other users. This is why for example across the European Union, Private Mobile Radio on 446 MHz, or PMR446, a unlicensed radio provision that allows for business and personal use, has heavily regulated hardware. These devices are not permitted in places like Australia, the USA and Canada because in those countries, 446 MHz is used by radio amateurs and military radar systems.

    This is why you'll find equipment like mobile phone amplifiers and jammers are heavily regulated and controlled. You'll also discover that transmitting on public frequencies like the FM broadcast band is a massive No-No. I'm not going into the so-called "FM capture effect", but the impact is that your personal transmitter needs to be locally louder than the station you're trying to break into and that in turn means that your little transmitter isn't so little any longer and the neighbours and the regulator will notice and come looking for you.

    Before this begins to sound like I'm stopping anyone from experimenting, let me point out that licensed radio amateurs have been granted permission to experiment in this magical radio play ground. Of course there are very strict rules around this, but perhaps now there is an understanding on why that might be the case.

    The more you dig in, the more stuff there is to explore and learn. As a radio amateur you are granted the keys to the city as it were.

    If this information was shared with you after you asked a simple question, perhaps it's time to stop what you're doing, consider the impact on your wallet and equipment and in some cases freedom, and instead explore the idea of becoming a radio amateur where you can legally play with this stuff.

    If you're already licensed, perhaps this will help to explain to others why.

    I'm Onno VK6FLAB


    Previous 1 16 17 18 19 20 61 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Ham Nation

    1

    Ham Nation Games & Hobbies
    The Brülosophy Podcast

    2

    The Brülosophy Podcast Games & Hobbies
    Good Job, Brain!

    3

    Good Job, Brain! Games & Hobbies
    Making It With Jimmy Diresta, Bob Clagett and David Picciuto

    4

    Making It With Jimmy Diresta, Bob Clagett and David Picciuto Arts
    Waypoint Radio

    5

    Waypoint Radio Arts
    BeerSmith Home and Beer Brewing Podcast

    6

    BeerSmith Home and Beer Brewing Podcast Games & Hobbies
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights