TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Christianity

    Faith & Culture

    Joseph Pearce, Editor of Faith & Culture magazine, has weekly interviews with well-known Catholic authors, speakers, and academics on a variety of topics related to Catholicism.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Father Longenecker's Favourite Films Apr 27, 2020
    Show notes

    Favourite Films: In the first of a series on a few of Fr. Dwight Longenecker's favourite things, Joseph Pearce asks him about his favourite films.

    Father Longenecker's Favourite Films Joseph Pearce

    Mark 8:34–35 with St. John Paul II Apr 24, 2020
    Show notes

    “And calling the crowd to him with his disciples, he said to them, ‘If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and the gospel’s will save it.’”

    In Mark 8, Jesus delivers the first of three predictions of his passion, death, and resurrection found in the Gospel (Mk. 8:31). Upon hearing this, Peter rebukes the Lord. Jesus immediately chastises Peter and commands him to “get behind” him. With these seemingly harsh words Jesus echoes his initial invitation for Simon Peter to follow him, to “get behind” him as his disciple (cf. Mk. 1:17). For the disciple is called to follow the Master closely; this is where one learns the Christian life. The Lord makes it clear that being his disciple entails doing what he does, not telling him what to do. Jesus tells those gathered around him—apostles, disciples, and the crowd—that each and every one of his followers is called to take up the cross and follow him. Pope St. John Paul II, in a Wednesday audience, acknowledges that with these words “Christ proposes a narrow way that demands sacrifice and total self-giving.” It remains clear as the gospel unfolds that the path of following Christ “includes the thorns of suffering and persecution.” John Paul II concludes, “discipleship, then, is not an easy journey on a level road.” It is the path of imitating Christ in all things, including the journey up the hill of Calvary.

    From the gospel we know of Peter’s harsh reaction to hearing his friend predict his suffering and death. Imagine, for a moment, what everyone else thought when they heard the prophecy of what their own vocation would demand. These words are difficult for us to hear. In fact, they might be too much to bear if the Lord did not attach a promise of salvation to them. It is on that promise that John Paul II encourages us to fix our gaze, for the “ultimate goal of discipleship is glory.” This is the paradox of the personal cross that the Christian carries behind Christ. The Cross, an instrument of death, becomes a means of life because of Jesus’ own death and subsequent Resurrected glory. The suffering we experience in our lives, then, is an opportunity to bear our cross as the Lord commanded. We prove our fidelity to him by self-sacrificial acts of love. This is how we become more like him. Through faithfully and lovingly carrying our cross, we look forward to the reward he promised. St. Paul reinforces this logic stating, “for if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his” (Rom. 6:5). John Paul II reminds us to look to the “Cross, sign of love and of total self-giving” because it is “the emblem of the disciple called to be configured to the glorious Christ.”[1]

    [1] Summary by Ben Akers with the use of Pope John Paul II, Wednesday Audience, 6 September 2000.


    Luke 5:16 with St. Bonaventure Apr 21, 2020
    Show notes

    “But he would withdraw to desolate places to pray.”

    This short verse only appears in the Gospel of Luke, but not in the other gospels. It gives us a profound insight into Jesus’ earthly life and his habit of solitary prayer in seclusion. So often we think of him as surrounded by lots of people, preaching to them and healing them, but his outward ministry was fueled by the inner life of prayer to His Father in secret.

    St. Bonaventure notes that unlike most of us, Jesus “didn’t seek human glory or fame, but fled from these.” His habit of prayer “gave us the model of going away from the world and approaching close to God.” To be effective evangelists, we must be authentic witnesses in this regard. And what we do in secret reveals what we really care about. When we pray in secret, all alone with God, we do not gain the approval of other people, influence in the world, financial security or any other material gain. Instead, we prove our love for Him to be genuine.

    Bonaventure says, “for prayer to be pleasing to God, it must not be public in the open market, but hidden in the desert.” While we might not be able to go to a literal desert for our prayer time, we can seek out a quiet corner, a hidden nook, a private place to spend time conversing with God alone. Jesus set the pattern for us by seeking out “desolate places” away from the crowds, away from his disciples, so he could be undistracted and fully engaged in prayer.

    We can follow his example by setting aside quiet time in a quiet place on a daily basis just for Him. In addition, we can make our prayer “pleasing to God” by seeking out special opportunities for private prayer like weekend retreats, silent adoration and the occasional moment to step in the back of a dimly lit church when no one is around. If we find a way to do these things, we will taste the sweetness of communion, the joy of intimacy and the depth of His love.[1]

    [1] Summary by Mark Giszczak with the use of Bonaventure, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke: Chapters 1–8, 411.


    The Screen and Reading with Father Longenecker Apr 20, 2020
    Show notes

    The Screen and Reading: Can watching movies be a substitute for good reading? Can images on the screen convey deep truths as well as great literature does? Fr. Dwight Longenecker and Joseph Pearce delve deeper into these questions.

    The Screen and Reading with Father Longenecker Joseph Pearce

    Mark 16:14–15 with St. Gregory the Great Apr 17, 2020
    Show notes

    “Afterward he appeared to the eleven themselves as they were reclining at table, and he rebuked them for their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they had not believed those who saw him after he had risen. And he said to them, ‘Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation.’”

    St. Gregory the Great, in commenting on this passage from Mark, asks some important questions: why did some of the disciples at first deny the resurrection when they were told about it (by Mary Magdalene and others)? And, why does the command to preach the gospel to the whole creation come directly after Christ’s rebuke? The one (preaching the gospel) does not seem to follow from the other (unbelief). To the first question, Gregory answers that we should not criticize the weakness of the apostles too quickly, but realize that their doubts have yielded great benefits to us, because Christ “showed them in their doubt many proofs of his resurrection.” When we see these proofs and put ourselves in shoes of the apostles “we are strengthened as a result of their doubt,” says Gregory. In particular, of the story of St. Thomas, who asked to put his hand into the Lord’s side (cf. Jn. 20:25), St. Gregory comments “while doubting, he touched the scars of the wound, and cut out of our hearts the wound of doubt.”

    But what of the second question? Why does Jesus rebuke his followers for hardness of heart, but then immediately afterwards commission them to preach? Jesus scolds them, Gregory explained, “in order to fix his parting words more firmly in the hearts of his hearers.” In other words, the disciples received the correction of Jesus so that he could strengthen them, not just in their own personal faith life, but for the proclamation of the gospel.

    We might sometimes be tempted to think that we need to have everything figured out, that we need to be completely faithful and sure of ourselves before we can open our mouths and speak of Jesus to others. But Gregory reminds us that part of the process of healing our vision so that we can truly see the resurrection is to act: to share our faith and to preach it “to the whole creation,” as Mark says. Preaching to the whole creation does not mean that we preach to rocks and to trees, says Gregory, but to every single person everywhere, because on this universal preaching the meaning and beauty of the whole creation rests.

    Summary by Elizabeth Klein with the use of Gregory the Great, Forty Gospel Homilies 29, trans. David Hurst (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1990), 226–229.


    John 1:1–3 with St. Augustine Apr 15, 2020
    Show notes

    “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.”

    St. Augustine cites John 1:1 more than any other gospel passage. This passage is fundamental for his understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity and the identity of Jesus Christ. The passage means that Jesus is God the Word–not identical with the Father (since the Word is with God) and yet at the same time fully God (since the Word is God). As God, the Word is also said to be the creator of all things.

    Augustine reiterates these points not just in his theological writings, but frequently in his homilies, encouraging his audience to plumb the depths of this mystery even though they cannot fully understand it: “It says and the Word was God (Jn. 1:1). We are talking about God; so why be surprised if you cannot grasp it? I mean, if you can grasp it, it isn’t God.” Nevertheless, our eternal happiness is to be with God and to know him, since “we human beings are made blessed by our hearts just brushing against that which abides always blessed; and that is itself eternal blessedness.” Therefore, contemplating God and the Trinity is essential for every Christian. Augustine explains why: “God does not increase thanks to those who know him, but those who know him do, thanks to their knowledge of God.” To know God better is to grow in the spiritual life and finally to know God is blessedness, it is our destination in heaven.

    Augustine gives an analogy to help us understand how important and beautiful it is to strive to know God. He says that John 1:1 tells us that the Word is above all created things, and thus the Word is what we should want to acquire above all created things. Normally, when we want to acquire something we have to give something else away. We have to give money to buy bread. We have to give time to earn money. But what could we give to gain the Word, which is above all? What could we possibly trade in hopes of gaining something of such great value? Augustine says that we can only give everything, that is, ourselves. However, unlike in the case of giving away money to buy goods, when we give away our whole selves to Christ we, in the end, find we have in fact lost nothing: “now if you want to buy this Word, if you want to have it, don’t look for something outside yourself you can give; give yourself. When you have done that, you don’t lose yourself as you lose the price when you buy something. So the Word of God is set before us all. Let those buy it who can; all those who devoutly wish to can do so.”

    [1] Summary by Elizabeth Klein with the use of Augustine s. 117 in Essential Sermons, 195–203.


    What’s the ESV-CE? Apr 14, 2020
    Show notes

    A Conversation with Mark Giszczak

    Faith&Culture welcomes the Augustine Institute’s Professor Mark Giszczak for a conversation about the Augustine Bible, which is the first American edition of the new ESV-CE Bible.

    Faith & Culture:

    So, just what is the ESV-CE anyway?

    Mark Giszczak:

    It is a new Catholic translation of the Bible. In 2018, the Catholic Church in India approved this new translation: The English Standard Version, Catholic Edition (ESV-CE). This new translation is a modified form of the ESV Bible, which was translated by evangelical scholars and first released in 2001. The ESV is an update of the trusted Revised Standard Version (1952, 1971). It was reviewed by a team of Catholic scholars in India, who modified the translation to ensure it adhered to Catholic teaching. Now the translation is required for liturgical use throughout India. The translation is essentially literal and as transparent as possible to the original languages.

    Faith & Culture:

    Is the ESV-CE translation approved by the Catholic Church?

    Mark Giszczak:

    Yes. Under the Code of Canon Law, 825 §1, only the Vatican or a national bishops’ conference can approve a Bible translation for publication. In accord with canon law, the ESV-CE was approved by the Conference of Catholic Bishops of India on February 4, 2018 and granted the Imprimatur by Cardinal Oswald Gracias, a member of Pope Francis’ top advisory team, the Council of Cardinals. The translation explicitly adhered to the Vatican’s translation principles prescribed by Liturgiam authenticam (2001). The Vatican approved the ESV-CE Lectionary on December 9, 2019, and it is mandated for liturgical use throughout India as of Palm Sunday 2020.

    Faith & Culture:

    Were any Catholic scholars involved in the preparation of the ESV-CE?

    Mark Giszczak:

    The team of scholars which the Catholic Bishops of India entrusted with the task of revising the ESV for Catholic use included: Rev. Dr. Lucien Legrand, MEP, Rev. Dr. Assisi Saldanha, CSsR, Rev. Dr. Govindu Rayanna, Rev. Dr. A. Alfred Joseph, Rev. Dr. David Stanly Kumar, Sr. Dr. Prema Vakayil, CSST, Rev. Dr. Shabu Joseph Thottumkal, SDB, Rev. Dr. Stanislas Savarimuthu.

    Faith & Culture:

    Will the translation sound familiar or foreign?

    Mark Giszczak:

    If you have ever read the King James Bible or its twentieth century update, the Revised Standard Version, the ESV will sound familiar. As an intentional update of the RSV, the ESV removes archaic-sounding words and phrases, while trying to improve on the translation and changing about 60,000 words in all. It is close enough to the RSV to sound familiar, but different enough to feel fresh.

    Faith & Culture:

    Does it include the deuterocanonical books?

    Mark Giszczak:

    The ESV-CE includes all the deuterocanonical books and additions. The original ESV from 2001 was a Protestant publication and so did not include the deuterocanonical books and additions (1 and 2 Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, Sirach, Wisdom, Baruch, additions to Esther, additions to Daniel). The 2018 Catholic Edition of the ESV includes all of the books held to be canonical by the Catholic Church.

    Faith & Culture:

    Isn’t the ESV a Protestant translation? Doesn’t that pose problems for Catholics?

    Mark Giszczak:

    The ESV was originally translated by a team of evangelical scholars under the auspices of Crossway Books, a Protestant publisher. It was, however, adapted by Catholic scholars and only then approved by the Catholic Church in India in 2018 as the ESV-Catholic Edition. In this way, the ESV is much like the RSV before it. The RSV was originally released in 1952 as a Protestant translation and only later approved by Catholic bishops in 1965-66. Both the RSV and the ESV are valuable ecumenical efforts that allow Protestants and Catholics to read Scripture together.

    Faith & Culture:

    Who translated the ESV?

    Mark Giszczak:

    The 2001 ESV translation effort was headed up by the Translation Oversight Committee brought together by Crossway Books. That original twelve-member team of evangelical scholars included Dr. Clifford John Collins, Dr. Lane T. Dennis, Dr. Wayne A. Grudem, Dr. Paul R. House, Dr. R. Kent Hughes, Dr. Robert H. Mounce, Dr. William D. Mounce, Dr. J.I. Packer, Dr. Leland Ryken, Dr. Vern Sheridan Poythress, Dr. Gordon Wenham, and Dr. Bruce Winter. A group of Catholic scholars in India updated the translation before the 2018 release of the ESV-CE.

    Faith & Culture:

    When was the ESV-CE released?

    Mark Giszczak:

    The ESV-CE was first released in India in 2018 by the Asian Trading Corporation. The ESV-CE was released in the United States in 2019 by the Augustine Institute.

    Get your copy of the ESV-CE Bible today at Catholic.Market.


    Myth and the Bible with Father Longenecker Apr 13, 2020
    Show notes

    Myth and the Bible: What are myths? Are they lies or do they tell the truth? What relationship is there, if any, between myths and the Bible? Joseph Pearce and Fr. Dwight Longenecker tackle these contentious questions.

    Myth and the Bible with Father Longenecker Joseph Pearce

    John 19:26–27 with St. John Paul II Apr 10, 2020
    Show notes

    “When Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, ‘Woman, behold, your son!’ Then he said to the disciple, ‘Behold, your mother!’ And from that hour the disciple took her to his own home.”

    With these words we find ourselves at the foot of the Cross with Mary, the mother of Jesus and John, the beloved disciple of Christ. We also discover that we are at the center of a profound mystery of our faith. The exchange between these three comprise an important “message of the cross,” according to Pope St. John Paul II, for they are “supreme words of love.” Mary’s presence at the cross is more than just the natural love and affection a mother has for her suffering child, although it does involve that. John Paul II observes that “Mary’s presence at the cross shows her commitment to total participation in her Son’s redemptive sacrifice.” Mary freely and fully accepts, “with Christ, the mysterious plan of the Father.” Her position indicates that the mother of Jesus “forever remains the perfect model of all who would accept to associate without reserve with the redemptive offer.” Christ’s mother, then, teaches us the art of uniting our minds and hearts with the will of God especially in times of suffering.

    The suffering of Christ in which we have a share is often not what we would choose for ourselves. Mary would never have wanted her Son to suffer and to die in this way; yet, she trusts in God’s plan. This offers us a chance to reflect on crosses in our own life. When suffering enters our life, as it does in every person’s life, what is our response towards it? Jesus’ entrusting of his mother to the disciple’s care illustrates his “testament of love” for all his followers throughout the ages. The experience of having received Mary’s “motherly love” in his own life is something Jesus “wanted his disciples to also enjoy … as part of the relationship with him throughout the development of their spiritual life.” As we grow in our life of discipleship to Christ we should also nurture a relationship with his mother. Having Mary as a mother is something Jesus wants for us as well. As we consider our Christian lives, Pope John Paul II invites us to have affection for the Blessed Mother and to allow “her to form us in true docility towards God, in true union with Christ, in true charity towards neighbor.” Pope John Paull II asks each disciple to “welcome Mary into his home, in his life” and to strive to “appreciate more and more the gift that the crucified Christ has given us, leaving us his own mother as our mother.” 30

    [30] Summary by Ben Akers with the use of Pope John Paul II, Wednesday Audience, 23 November 1988.


    John 6:53–57 with St. Cyril of Alexandria Apr 09, 2020
    Show notes

    “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever feeds on me, he also will live because of me.”

    The Fathers of the Church bear powerful witness to early Christian belief in Christ’s Real Presence in the Eucharist. Perhaps less often appreciated is their rich teaching about why Jesus would give himself to us in this way. In his commentary on this passage, St. Cyril of Alexandria largely takes the fact of Christ’s Real Presence for granted. He focuses instead on our reception of the gift of divine life through the Eucharist. This gift turns on the mystery of the Incarnation, the mystery of God becoming man in Jesus Christ. Cyril explains that, since he is the divine Word, Jesus is “life by nature, inasmuch as he was begotten of the living Father. And his holy body too is no less life-giving, since it is in some way brought together and ineffably united with the Word who gives life to all.” Because Christ’s flesh is perfectly united to his divinity, “when we taste of it” in the Eucharist, “then we have life in ourselves, since we too are united to that flesh just as it is united to the Word who indwells it.”

    Cyril is also anxious to guard against a possible misunderstanding of the last sentence of this passage, which could be taken to mean that the Son receives life from the Father in the same way as we do, that is, by grace rather than by nature. There are several good reasons why this question is important. Let us consider just one. Cyril points out that Jesus says that he is “the life” (Jn. 11:25). The “life” we receive from Jesus in the Holy Eucharist, then, is the very life that he is by nature as the Father’s only-begotten. This means, in turn, that our share in the eternal Father’s life is not given to us at one remove. As the “one mediator between God and men” (1 Tim. 2:5), Jesus does not stand between us and the Father as a barrier as well as a bridge. Rather, he mediates by sharing with us his very own relationship of eternal life and love with the Father. That relationship is his by nature, ours by participation through the grace of adoption. But it is the very same relationship. And we receive it, astonishingly, under the form of bread and wine. 26

    [26] Summary by John Sehorn with the use of Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John 4.2-3 in Commentary on John, vol. 1, trans. David R. Maxwell, Ancient Christian Texts (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2013), 236–243.


    Previous 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Joel Osteen Podcast

    1

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    Joel Osteen Podcast

    2

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    The Bible For Normal People

    3

    The Bible For Normal People Christianity
    The Liturgists Podcast

    4

    The Liturgists Podcast Christianity
    Firestarters

    5

    Firestarters Christianity
    Elevation with Steven Furtick

    6

    Elevation with Steven Furtick Christianity
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights