TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Christianity

    Faith & Culture

    Joseph Pearce, Editor of Faith & Culture magazine, has weekly interviews with well-known Catholic authors, speakers, and academics on a variety of topics related to Catholicism.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    On the Holy Spirit May 28, 2020
    Show notes

    This excerpt is taken from the ninth chapter of St. Basil the Great’s (c. 330-379) On the Holy Spirit. St. Basil is a doctor of the Church and this work is one of the first to meditate at length on the third person of the Trinity. It was written partly in defense of the divinity of the Holy Spirit, which was denied by some in Basil’s time.

    Let us now investigate our common ideas concerning the Spirit, those which have been gathered from Holy Scripture concerning him, as well as those which we have received from the unwritten tradition of the Fathers.

    First of all we ask, who upon hearing the titles of the Spirit is not lifted up in soul, who does not raise his mind to the supreme nature? He is called “Spirit of God” (Mt 12:28), “Spirit of truth which proceeds from the Father” (Jn 15:26), “right Spirit” (Ps 50:12), “a leading Spirit” (Ps 50:14). His proper and peculiar title is “Holy Spirit;” which is a name specially appropriate to everything that is without a body, everything that is purely immaterial and indivisible. So our Lord, when teaching the woman [at the well] – who thought that God is an object of local worship – that what is without a body cannot be confined, he said that God is a spirit (Jn 4:24).

    When we hear of a spirit, then, it is impossible to think of a nature which is confined, subject to change and variation, or at all like a creature. We are compelled to advance in our conceptions to the highest, and to think of an intelligent essence, in power infinite, in magnitude unlimited, unmeasured by times or ages, generous of his good gifts, to whom turn all things needing sanctification, after whom reach all things that live in virtue, as being watered by his inspiration and helped on toward their natural and proper end; perfecting all other things, but in himself lacking nothing; living not as one needing restoration, but as supplier of life; not growing by additions; but straightway full, self-established, omnipresent, origin of holiness, light perceptible to the mind, supplying, as it were, through himself, illumination to every faculty in the search for truth; by nature unapproachable, apprehended by reason of goodness, filling all things with his power, but communicated only to the worthy; not shared in one measure, but distributing his energy according to the proportion of faith (Rom 12:6); in essence simple, in powers various, wholly present in each and being wholly everywhere; impassively divided, shared without loss of ceasing to be entire, after the likeness of the sunbeam, whose kindly light falls on him who enjoys it as though it shone for him alone, yet illumines land and sea and mingles with the air. So, too, is the Spirit to everyone who receives it, as though given to him alone, and yet he sends forth grace sufficient and full for all humankind, and is enjoyed by all who share him, according not to the Spirit’s power, but to the capacity of our nature.

    Now the Spirit is not brought into intimate association with the soul by nearness in place. How indeed could there be a bodily nearness to the incorporeal? This kinship results from our withdrawal from the passions which, coming afterwards gradually on the soul from its friendship to the flesh, have alienated it from its close relationship with God. Only then, after a man is purified from the shame whose stain he took through his wickedness, and has come back again to his natural beauty, and as it were cleaning the Royal Image and restoring its ancient form, only thus is it possible for him to draw near to the Paraclete. And the Spirit, like the sun, will by the aid of your purified eye show you in himself the image of the invisible, and in the blessed spectacle of the image you shall behold the unspeakable beauty of the archetype. Through his aid hearts are lifted up, the weak are held by the hand, and they who are advancing are brought to perfection. Shining upon those that are cleansed from every spot, he makes them spiritual by fellowship with himself. Just as when a sunbeam falls on bright and transparent bodies, they themselves become brilliant too, and shed forth a fresh brightness from themselves, so souls wherein the Spirit dwells, illuminated by the Spirit, themselves become spiritual, and send forth their grace to others. Hence comes foreknowledge of the future, understanding of mysteries, apprehension of what is hidden, distribution of good gifts, the heavenly citizenship, a place in the chorus of angels, joy without end, abiding in God, being made like to God, and, highest of all, being made God. Such, then, to name but a few, are our ideas concerning the Holy Spirit, which we have been taught to hold concerning his greatness, his dignity, and his actions, by the sayings of the Spirit themselves [i.e. the Scriptures].

    Translation taken from the Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers Series, with minor modifications by Elizabeth Klein.


    John 14:23 with St. Gregory the Great May 27, 2020
    Show notes

    “Jesus answered him, ‘If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.’”

    John 14:23 is short and sweet. St. Gregory the Great explains this sweetness in more detail: “the Holy Spirit is love, and so John says ‘God is love’ (cf. 1 Jn. 4:16). A person who desires God with his whole heart already possess the one he loves; no one could love God unless he possesses the one he loves.” Gregory expounds on the beauty of this verse by teaching us that anyone who loves Jesus will already possess the love of the Father and the Holy Spirit, because we believe that God is in himself an eternal exchange of love, that God is Trinity. We do not merely love God, therefore, but since God is love, he is also the means by which we love him. The wonderful sweetness of this verse comes not only from knowing that God loves us, but that God is love itself, dwelling within us, making our heart his home so that we may love him and others.

    But this verse also helps us resist the idea that the love of God is just a good feeling or sentiment. When we hear the verse we likely respond as Gregory suggests: “if any one of you should be asked if he loved God he would answer with entire confidence and complete conviction, ‘I do.’” But is that “I do” just empty words or is it really love? The “I do” in a marriage means in sickness and in health, for better or for worse, it means doing not just feeling. The same is true of our “I do” to God. Gregory reminds us of this fact: “you heard at the beginning of the reading what Truth said: ‘if anyone loves me, he will keep my word.’ The proof of love is its manifestation in deeds.” If someone were to tell you that they loved you, but then they never talked to you, never helped you, and never spent time with you, you would say that their words were a lie. So likewise, let us not just confess the love of God with our lips but act in love as the Lord commands. [1]

    [1] Summary by Elizabeth Klein with the use of Gregory the Great, Forty Gospel Homilies 30, 236–238.


    The Mission of St. Philip Neri May 26, 2020
    Show notes

    His times were such as the Church has never seen before nor since, and such as the world must last long for her to see again; nor peculiar only in themselves but involving a singular and most severe trial of the faith and love of her children. It was a time of sifting and peril, and of “the fall and resurrection of many in Israel.”

    He had been fifteen years in Rome before he was ordained; and then at length, on his receiving faculties for hearing confessions, he began, at the age of thirty-five, his real mission—that long course of ministry, which, carried on for years three times fifteen, down almost to the hour of his death, has gained for him the title of Apostle of Rome.

    You know what is commonly meant by an Apostle of a country. It means one who converts its heathen inhabitants to the Christian faith, such as St. Augustine of England; accordingly, his proper function is Baptism. This was the office to which St. Philip wished to minister in India; but it was his zeal and charity that urged him, not his mature judgment; for the fierce conflicts, and the pastoral cares, and the rude publicity of such exalted duties, were unsuited to his nature; so he was kept at home for a different work. He was kept at home, in the very heart of Christendom, not to evangelize, but to recover; and his instrument of conversion was, not Baptism, but Penance. The Confessional was the seat and seal of his peculiar Apostolate. Hence, as St. Francis Xavier baptized his tens of thousands, Philip was, every day and almost every hour, for forty-five years, restoring, teaching, encouraging, and guiding penitents along the narrow way of salvation.

    We are told that “he abandoned every other care and gave himself to hearing confessions.” Not content with the day, he gave up a considerable portion of the night to it also. Before dawn he had generally confessed a good number. When he retired to his room, he still confessed everyone who came; though at prayers, though at meals, he broke off instantly, and attended to the call. When the church was opened at daybreak, he went down to the Confessional, and remained in it till noon, when he said Mass. When no penitents came, he remained near his Confessional; he never intermitted hearing confessions for any illness. It was this extraordinary persevering service in so trying, so wearing a duty, for forty-five years, that enabled him to be the new Apostle of the Sacred City. Thus it was, as the lesson in his Office says, that “he bore innumerable children to Christ.” He was ever suffering their miseries, and fighting with their sins, and travailing with their good resolves, year after year, whatever their state of life, their calling, their circumstances, if so be that he might bring them safe to heaven, with a superhuman, heroic patience.

    It is not surprising that, with this tenderness, with this prudence, and with the zeal and charity to which both were subordinate, his influence increased year by year, till he gained a place in the heart of the Roman population, which he has never lost.

    There are those whose greatest works are their earliest; there are others, who, at first scarcely distinguishable from a whole class who look the same, distance them in the long run, and do more and more wonderful works the longer they live. Philip was thirty-five before he was ordained; forty, before he began his exercises in his room; fifty, before he had a church; sixty before he formed his disciples into a congregation; near seventy, before he put himself at the head of it. As the Blessed Virgin’s name has by a majestic growth expanded and extended itself through the Church, “taking root in an honorable people, and resting in the Holy City,” so the influence of Philip was, at the end of many years, paramount in that place which he has so long dwelt in as an obscure, disregarded stranger. Sharp eyes and holy sympathies indeed had detected “Philip Neri, as a saint living in caves,” when he was a youth; but it required half a century to develop this truth to the intelligence of the multitude of men. At length there was no possibility of mistaking it. Visitors to Rome discerned the presence of one who was greater than Pope and Cardinals, holy, venerable and vigilant as the rulers of the Church then were. “Among all the wonderful things which I saw in Rome,” says one of them, writing when Philip was turned fifty, “I took the chief pleasure in beholding the multitude of devout and spiritual persons who frequented the Oratory. Amid the monuments of antiquity, the superb palaces and courts of so many illustrious lords, it appeared to me that the glory of this exemplar shone forth with surpassing light.”

    It required to live in Rome to understand what his influence really was. Nothing was too high for him, nothing too low. He taught poor begging women to use mental prayer; he took out boys to play; he protected orphans; he acted as novice-master to the children of St. Dominic. He was the teacher and director of artisans, mechanics, cashiers in banks, merchants, workers in gold, artists, men of science. He was consulted by monks, canons, lawyers, physicians, courtiers; ladies of the highest rank, convicts going to execution, engaged in their turn his solicitude and prayers. Cardinals hung about his room, and Popes asked for his miraculous aid in disease, and his ministrations in death. It was his mission to save men, not from, but in, the world. To break the haughtiness of rank, and the fastidiousness of fashion, he gave his penitents public mortifications; to draw the young from the theatres, he opened his Oratory of Sacred Music; to rescue the careless from the Carnival and its excesses, he set out in pilgrimage to the Seven Basilicas. For those who loved reading, he substituted, for the works of chivalry or the hurtful novels of the day, the true romance and the celestial poetry of the Lives of the Saints. He set one of his disciples to write history against the heretics of that age; another to treat of the Notes of the Church; a third, to undertake the Martyrs and Christian Antiquities—for, while in the discourses and devotions of the Oratory, he prescribed the simplicity of the primitive monks, he wished his children, individually and in private, to cultivate all their gifts to the full. He, however, was, after all and in all, their true model—the humble priest, shrinking from every kind of dignity, or post, or office, and living the greater part of day and night in prayer, in his room or upon the housetop.

    And when he died, a continued stream of people, says his biographer, came to see his body, during the two days that it remained in the church, kissing his bier, touching him with their rosaries or their rings, or taking away portions of his hair, or the flowers which were strewed over him; and, among the crowd, persons of every rank and condition were heard lamenting and extolling one who was so lowly, yet so great; who had been so variously endowed, and had been the pupil of so many saintly masters; who had the breadth of view of St. Dominic, the poetry of St. Benedict, the wisdom of St. Ignatius, and all recommended by an unassuming grace and a winning tenderness which were his own.

    First preached at the Oratory, in Birmingham, on January 15 and 18, 1850 and published in Sermons Preached on Various Occasions.


    Father Longenecker's Favourite Poems May 25, 2020
    Show notes

    Favourite Poems: In the fourth and final part of a series on a few of Fr. Dwight Longenecker's favourite things, Joseph Pearce asks him about his favourite poems.

    Father Longenecker's Favourite Poems Joseph Pearce

    Matthew 19:16–17, 20–21 with St. John Paul II May 22, 2020
    Show notes

    “And behold, a man came up to him, saying, ‘Teacher, what good deed must I do to have eternal life?’ And he said to him, ‘Why do you ask me about what is good? There is only one who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.’ …The young man said to him, ‘All these I have kept. What do I still lack?’ Jesus said to him, ‘If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.’”

    When the rich young man approaches Jesus and poses him the question, “What good deed must I do to have eternal life?” it can sound coarsely transactional—okay, if I do this, God, will you give me that? It seems as if God is a giant gumball machine and we are sleuthing out the right token to insert in order to have eternal bliss dispensed into our eager palm.

    St. John Paul II helpfully dispels this idea: “For the young man, the question is not so much about rules to be followed, but about the full meaning of life. This is in fact the aspiration at the heart of every human decision and action, the quiet searching and interior prompting which sets freedom in motion.” In other words, the rich young man takes up a fundamental question of human life—a question that lies on each one of our hearts—and brings it before the good Teacher: what good must I do to find ultimate fulfillment?

    To this question, Jesus offers a twofold answer: keep the commandments, and come and follow me. Regarding the commandments, John Paul II makes clear that although the question of morality is not firstly about rules, it is not therefore entirely unconnected with them. “A close connection is made between eternal life and obedience to God's commandments: God's commandments show man the path of life and they lead to it.” It is one and the same divine wisdom that created us and set forth for us the path of life in the commandments. In this way, the commandments serve and foster our good, rather than constrain it.

    But obeying the commandments only makes up the starting point. “Perfection demands that maturity in self-giving to which human freedom is called,” writes John Paul. The commandments ultimately offer a training in self-giving love, for God first of all and then for our neighbor; but this training is perfected in following Christ—“come, follow me” (Mt. 19:21). Christ gave up everything out of love for us, and thus we are called to do the same. In this light, Jesus’ words to the young man, “Sell what you possess and give to the poor,” follow the logic of giving up everything to follow Christ. We follow him, forsaking any and all loves that might vie for our affection, in order to become like him, as an apprentice becomes like the master and as a disciple becomes like the crucified and resurrected Lord.[1]

    [1] Summary by Scott Hefelfinger with use of John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Veritatis splendor (1993), 7–17.


    The Work of God May 20, 2020
    Show notes

    Froh erfülle deine Pflicht. It was twenty years ago that I saw this German phrase in needlepoint in an antique shop in the Shenandoah Valley. “Do your duty cheerfully” is close enough to its literal meaning. I remember thinking at the time that it was a charming relic of Pennsylvania Dutch Lutheran culture.

    As is true of many in my generation, my thinking about the moral and spiritual life has been shaped by the teaching of the late Servais Pinckaers, O.P., who did so much to recover a synthetic vision in which natural inclinations, human freedom, and divine grace work in concert. Together with St. John Paul II’s Veritatis Splendor, Pinckaer’s Sources of Christian Ethics helped to reset Catholic discourse. Rather than a rear-guard action against the latest infidelities proposed by dissenters, moral theology in the past two decades has often been an inspiring sapiential discipline, true to the high call that the Lord gave to us in his Sermon on the Mount.

    As is well known, one of the features of this renewed moral theology is an emphasis upon the end, variously spoken of as divine friendship, divinization, or, simply, charity. The result has been deep and sustained reflection upon the life of Christ, the graces offered by the sacraments, and the gifts of the Holy Spirit. And this wisdom has not remained in scholarly journals and classrooms; it has been heard from the pulpit and in the privileged spheres of spiritual direction and the sacrament of penance. It has, however, often been noted that the renewal of moral theology needs to maintain contact with the pre-conciliar tradition of speaking about the moral life in terms of the Ten Commandments. And, in the third part of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, we see just such a synthesis, at least in its broad outlines.

    From time to time, however, one is reminded of the importance of the Commandments and their specification in the law of the Church. This is one of those times. As we return to our parishes for Sunday Mass, we have an occasion for thinking about what the First Commandment requires of us.

    The Catechism presents the First Commandment as an over-arching principle of submission to the Divine Will, a command the response to which is adoration, prayer, and, in sum, creaturely obedience, together with the avoidance of any form of idolatry that would supplant that submission. It may be asked, however, whether we should hear an echo of the First Commandment in the First Precept of the Church: “You shall attend Mass on Sundays and on holy days of obligation and rest from servile labor.”

    There are two difficulties here. The first is that the Precept evidently refers to the Third Commandment. Yes, but surely the command that the Mass which we are obliged to attend is the one offered on the Lord’s Day is a specification of the First Commandment’s more general lesson about the debt of worship we owe to God (see CCC 2135). The second difficulty is that the Precept is positive law, and even after decades of good Thomism, we remain skeptical of the pedagogical function of law. If the Church insists upon our duty to worship God in this way—by the regular attendance at Sunday Mass—then we may worry that we are confronted with a demand for social conformity that serves the rulers rather than the ruled.

    In order to appreciate the full bearing of the First Precept of the Church upon human character, it needs to be rightly situated. It is a claim upon the will. At stake is whether we love rightly. “Charity,” the authors of the Catechism explain in their treatment of the First Commandment, “leads us to render to God what we as creatures owe him in all justice. The virtue of religion disposes us to have this attitude” (CCC 2095).

    It is, of course, not enough for us creatures merely to have benevolent thoughts about God or to wish that our relationship to him were right. As in the case of any other exercise of justice, the proof is in the deed. And the First Precept of the Church has just such an action in view, the right public worship of God—worship that is “in spirit and truth” (Jn 4:23) and a very “work of God” (Jn 6:29) because it is a public manifestation of our belief in Christ.

    In recent weeks, we have heard many cries of anguish at the deprivation of the sacraments, most especially the reception of Holy Communion. And rightly so. But the topic of the duty of the laity to worship God has mostly been conspicuous by its absence. It seems fair to say that much of what has been heard during the quarantine has focused upon the spiritual growth of Catholics during a time of trial. Of those statements and discourses, many have been edifying, but some have bordered on the therapeutic.

    Certainly, attendance at Sunday Mass may involve the reception of Holy Communion and personal spiritual growth—one hopes that both are normally attained. What it always (or almost always) involves, however, is the subordination of the desires of the individual Catholic to the good of the whole parish. Sunday Mass is offered at set times, in a set place, with a certain group of people. At any given parish and at any given liturgy, there will be traffic jams, icy sidewalks, crowded seating, insufficient ventilation, crying children, maudlin music, rambling homilies, and now perhaps even the demand that a facemask be worn. These little slivers of the Cross are not what make attendance at Mass virtuous, but they are the proper signs of the truth that when we attend Sunday Mass at the parish we do so as parts of a larger whole, the Body of Christ. And we do so in fulfillment of a solemn duty—dignum et justum est—not merely from some private search for interior betterment, however exalted that may be. Given that the prevailing idolatry of our age is the worship of the self, it seems entirely appropriate that the regular attendance at Sunday Mass often involves setting aside personal preference in favor of common duty.

    The law-abiding practice of regularly attending Sunday Mass is also deeply formative of our character. In a world overwhelmed by sins against temperance, it is easy enough to overlook the importance of justice. Yet it is the exercise of justice that makes a man or a woman good. And the offenses that most trouble us in other people are injustices of one kind or another, such as lying, failure to return something owed, acts of disordered ambition, unjust expectations by employers, and other such deeds or omissions. St. Augustine memorably held that we ought not to consider an irreligious man to be just because such a man fails to repay the deepest and most solemn debt that he owes, his debt to God. Now, to be sure, we owe our entire lives to God. And our greatest models of Christian life, as Veritatis Splendor and Fr. Pinckaers were keen to point out, are indeed the martyrs, those who “gave their lives rather than perform this or that particular act contrary to faith or virtue” (VS 76). Few of us, however, will be called to martyrdom; all of us are rightly subject to the First Precept of the Church. And we should be grateful for the rule, for the imposition of the duty, because it tethers us to God and to his service in a concrete way that keeps us on the right path through life. From that vantage, then, we can say that the character of Catholics is deeply shaped by the obligation to worship and, concretely, by the practice of attending Mass every Sunday, one hopes, in the cheerful fulfillment of duty.

    Provenance/Rights: Museum Wolmirstedt [RR-F]


    Father Longenecker's Favourite Novels May 18, 2020
    Show notes

    Favourite Novels: In the third of a series on a few of Fr. Dwight Longenecker's favourite things, Joseph Pearce asks him about his favourite novels.

    Father Longenecker's Favourite Novels Joseph Pearce

    Saving Knowledge May 15, 2020
    Show notes

    “Hereby do we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments” (1 Jn 2:3).

    To know God and Christ seems to mean to live under the conviction of His presence, who is to our bodily eyes unseen. It is, in fact, to have faith, according to St. Paul’s account of faith, as the substance and evidence of what is invisible. It is faith, but not faith such as a Heathen might have, but Gospel faith; for only in the Gospel has God so revealed Himself, as to allow of that kind of faith which may be called, in a special manner, knowledge. The faith of Heathens was blind; it was more or less a moving forward in the darkness, with hand and foot. But the Gospel is a manifestation, and therefore addressed to the eyes of our mind. Faith is the same principle as before, but with the opportunity of acting through a more certain and satisfactory sense.

    We recognize objects by the eye at once; but not by the touch. We know them when we see them, but scarcely till then. Hence it is, that the New Testament says so much on the subject of spiritual knowledge. For instance, St. Paul prays that the Ephesians may receive “the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Christ, the eyes of their understanding being enlightened” (Eph 1:17-18), and he says, that the Colossians had “put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge, after the image of Him that created him” (Col 3:10). St. Peter, in like manner, addresses his brethren with the salutation of “Grace and peace, through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord” (2 Pet 1:2), according to the declaration of our Lord Himself, “This is life eternal, to know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent” (Jn 18:3).

    It is plain what is the object of spiritual sight which is given to us in the Gospel: God manifest in the Flesh. He who was before unseen has shown Himself in Christ, not merely displayed His glory, as (for instance) in what is called a providence, or visitation, or in miracles, or in the actions and character of inspired men, but really He Himself has come upon earth, and has been seen of men in human form. In the same kind of sense, in which we should say we saw a servant of His, Apostle or Prophet, though we could not see his soul, so man has seen the Invisible God; and we have the history of His sojourn among His creatures in the Gospels.

    To know God is life eternal, and to believe in the Gospel manifestation of Him is to know Him; but how are we to “know that we know Him?” How are we to be sure that we are not mistaking some dream of our own for the true and clear Vision? How can we tell we are not like gazers upon a distant prospect through a misty atmosphere, who mistake one object for another? St. John says, “Hereby do we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments.” Obedience is the test of Faith.

    Thus the whole duty and work of a Christian is made up of these two parts, faith and obedience: looking unto Jesus, the Divine Object as well as Author of our faith, and acting according to His will.

    To know Christ is to discern the Father of all, as manifested through His Only-begotten Son Incarnate. In the natural world we have glimpses, frequent and startling, of His glorious Attributes; of His power, wisdom, and goodness; of His holiness, His fearful judgments, His long remembrance of evil, His long-suffering towards sinners, and His strange encompassing mercy at times when we least looked for it. But to us mortals, who live for a day, and see but an arm’s length, such disclosures are like reflections of a prospect in a broken mirror; they do not enable us in any comfortable sense to know God. They are such as faith may use indeed, but hardly enjoy. This then was one among the benefits of Christ’s coming, that the Invisible God was then revealed in the form and history of man, revealed in those respects in which sinners most required to know Him, and nature spoke least distinctly, as a Holy yet Merciful Governor of His creatures. And thus the Gospels, which contain the memorials of this wonderful grace, are our principal treasures.

    Turning from Him to ourselves, we find a short rule given us, “If ye love Me, keep My commandments” (Jn 14:15). “He that saith he abideth in Him, ought himself also so to walk, even as He walked” (1 Jn 2:6). “If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God” (Col 3:1). This is all that is put upon us, difficult indeed to perform, but easy to understand; all that is put upon us, and for this plain reason, because Christ has done everything else. He has freely chosen us, died for us, regenerated us, and now ever lives for us; what remains? Simply that we should do as He has done to us, showing forth His glory by good works. Thus, a correct (or as we commonly call it), an orthodox faith and an obedient life, is the whole duty of man. And so, most surely, it has ever been accounted. Look into the records of the early Church, or into the writings of our own revered bishops and teachers, and see whether this is not the sum total of religion, according to the symbols of it in which children are catechized, the Creed, the Lord’s Prayer, and the Ten Commandments.

    The essence of Faith is to look out of ourselves [by] putting self aside and living upon Him who speaks in the Gospels.


    Jesus through Mary May 13, 2020
    Show notes

    In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

    Having resolved from all eternity to give us Jesus through Mary, God was not content to make use of her as an instrument. Rather, he wished her to cooperate in this great work. This is why he sent his angel to her to propose the mystery. The great work of the Incarnation could not be achieved until Mary’s consent had been given. It was necessary for mankind that she desire our salvation.

    God calls us, justifies us, and enables us to persevere. Vocation is the first step; justification is the progress we make; perseverance is the journey’s end. In these three stages, the work of Christ is required. Yet we see in the Scriptures that the charity of the Blessed Virgin is joined to them as well.

    Consider what happened to John the Baptist while he was in his mother’s womb, and you will see an image of sinners called by grace. John is in darkness: he can neither see nor hear. Jesus comes to him without his knowing it. Jesus approaches, he awakens and draws to himself this insensible heart. This is how the Son of God treats the sinners whom he calls, but he shows us in John’s case that the Virgin’s charity worked together with him. What made Jesus come to John if not the charity of the Blessed Virgin? If Jesus acted in John’s heart, was it not at the sound of his mother’s voice? In the case of John the Baptist, we see Mary as the mother of those whom Jesus calls.

    Let us now consider those whom he justifies: the disciples of the Son of God, at the wedding at Cana in Galilee. They had already been called, but they are not yet justified because they do not believe in their Master. Listen to the Evangelist: “This, the first of his signs, Jesus did at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory; and his disciples believed in him.” Could he have expressed himself in clearer terms about their justification by faith as a consequence of this miracle? Nor could he have better explained the part played by the Blessed Virgin. For who does not know that this great miracle was the effect of her charity and prayers?

    Let us also consider how Mary effects the holy perseverance of the children of God. Here is the Beloved Disciple of our Savior to represent us at Calvary: he is the figure of those who persevere, for he followed Jesus even to the Cross and attached himself so firmly to the mystical wood that he was ready to die with him. He is therefore the figure of those who persevere, and we see Jesus give him to his Mother: “Woman, behold, your son.” Those who understand how full of mysteries are the Scriptures will understand from these three examples that the charity of Mary is a general instrument of the operations of grace.

    Let us rejoice in our protector. The night with its terrors has passed; the day approaches, hope comes, and we see a first ray of it shining in the protection of the Blessed Virgin. She was born to bring us aid; it would not be possible to choose a better advocate. Let us pray that she will speak for us to the heart of her Son. We readily grant requests when we are already conquered by affection. It is for this reason that Mary always speaks efficaciously, because she speaks to the heart of a son. Let her speak boldly on our behalf to the heart of Jesus.

    What grace shall she ask for us? What do we desire from her intercession? Does not her charity inspire you to desire to be strengthened in charity? It is this that we ask. Without the desire to be charitable, what good does it do for us to call upon the name of Mary? Go on your way with these thoughts in mind: it is Mary who tells you. Do not let the day end without leaving behind some mark of her charity.

    Hail Mary, Full of Grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

    May the venerable intercession of Blessed Mary ever-Virgin come to our aid, we pray, O Lord, and free us from every danger, so that we may rejoice in your peace. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son. Who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

    In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

    IMAGE: Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, The Adoration of the Shepherds, c.1650, Oil on canvas, Museo del Prado, Madrid, Spain


    A Happy Death May 12, 2020
    Show notes

    In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

    Nature and grace together establish an immutable necessity of dying. It is a law of nature that all mortal things owe their tribute to death, and grace has not exempted mankind from this common necessity. The Son of God, having resolved to defeat death by dying, promulgated this law for us, so that we must pass through the hands of death in order to escape its grasp, we must enter the tomb in order to be reborn, and we must die once in order to strip mortality of its power. And so the death of the Blessed Virgin was a necessary part of her triumph: she had to submit to the law of death in order to leave behind her mortality.

    We must not suppose, however, that in submitting to the common law, she did so in an ordinary way. Everything about Mary is supernatural: a miracle gave Jesus Christ to her, and her life, full of miracles, came to an end by a death that was entirely divine. What was the principle of this admirable death? It was her love, maternal and divine, that brought it about. It was love that carried off Mary’s soul and which, breaking the bonds of her body, the bonds that were keeping her from rejoining her son, at last reunited them in heaven.

    Mary’s love was made by a flowing forth of the heart of God into her own heart, and the love that she had for her son came from the same source which gave her that son. What can human reason say in the face of this mystery? Do we pretend to comprehend the union of Mary and Jesus? We should not even attempt to explain the nature of a maternal love from so exalted a source, which is a participation in the love of the Father for his only-begotten Son. If we cannot understand its force or strength, how shall we imagine the emotions it generated? All we are able to understand is that there never was so great a human emotion as Mary’s longing to be reunited to Jesus, nor any violence like the one her heart suffered from their separation.

    We need seek no other cause for her death. This love was so ardent that one of its sighs alone would have sufficed to break the bonds of its mortal body. One of its regrets was sufficient to disturb the harmony of her being. A single desire sent heavenward was enough to draw forth Mary’s soul. Mary’s death was less of a miracle than the continual miracle of her remaining alive while separated from her beloved.

    Let us learn from her love to desire Jesus Christ, who is infinitely desirable. And what does Jesus desire? Will he find a heart that pines for him? Such a chaste longing is rarely found in this world, and it is a sure mark of the paltriness of our desire for Jesus if we are content to enjoy the good things of the earth. When fortune smiles upon us, and when we have all the wealth that we require for pleasure and health, do we nonetheless wish for another paradise? Do we imagine that there could be another happiness? If we let our heart speak to us, will it tell us how content it is with this life? If this be our condition, we may be assured that we are not Christians. And if we wish to be Christians, we know what we must do. We must believe that everything is lacking to us, though the world thinks that we have all that we need. We must groan in prosperity, and we must hope for rest only when we will be with Jesus. Otherwise, the words of St. Augustine will apply to us: “If you do not groan like a pilgrim, you will not rejoice like a citizen.” That is to say that you will never be an inhabitant of heaven because you wished to be one of the earth. Refusing the labors of the journey, you will not enjoy the repose of the fatherland, and resting when you should have been marching, you will never arrive at your destination. This is why Mary always wept in remembrance of Zion: her heart could have no peace as long as it was separated from her beloved. At last her desire took her to him, by means of a happy death.

    Hail Mary, Full of Grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

    O God, who, looking on the lowliness of the Blessed Virgin Mary, raised her to this grace, that your Only Begotten Son was born of her according to the flesh and that she was crowned with surpassing glory, grant through her prayers, that, saved by the mystery of your redemption, we may merit to be exalted by you on high. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son. Who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

    In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

    IMAGE: Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, The Assumption of the Virgin, 1670, Oil on canvas, Hermitage Museum, Saint Petersburg, Russia


    Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Joel Osteen Podcast

    1

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    Joel Osteen Podcast

    2

    Joel Osteen Podcast Christianity
    The Bible For Normal People

    3

    The Bible For Normal People Christianity
    The Liturgists Podcast

    4

    The Liturgists Podcast Christianity
    Firestarters

    5

    Firestarters Christianity
    Elevation with Steven Furtick

    6

    Elevation with Steven Furtick Christianity
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights