080 | 2026奥斯卡：好莱坞的美式中心主义叙事还站得住脚吗？ 2026 Oscars Recap
Mar 19, 2026
Show notes
【聊了什么The What】
电影颁奖季随着奥斯卡2026的完结落下帷幕，本期疲惫娇娃一年一度又来带着大家来例行盘点奥斯卡。先从争议开始，我们讨论了《K-pop猎魔女团》获奖感言被粗暴掐断引发的亚裔“噤声”事件和流媒体如何让学院派感到“被蚕食”的恐惧。几个娃也重点解析了年度大热《一战再战》与《罪人 Sinners》：艺术家电影人PTA是如何交出一份让大众满意的答卷？Ryan Coogler又是如何用恐怖片外壳包裹美国南方的移民血泪？我们对比了最佳男主提名的甜茶和获奖的Michael B. Jordan的表演（如果好奇我们对于甜茶的看法，请移步隔壁百花newsletter仔细阅读），也讨论了我们喜欢的导演赵婷和贾法·帕纳西。全球秩序分崩离析的当下，好莱坞的美式中心主义叙事在还站得住脚吗？敬请收听本期节目一探究竟。
Welcome to the annual Oscars recap by your neighborhood film and pop culture critics: CyberPink. We start off with controversies: discussing the "silencing" of Asian voices after the acceptance speech for K-Pop Demon Hunters was abruptly cut short, and exploring the ongoing battle between rise of streaming giants and the traditional film industry the Academy represents. We then jump into the heavy hitters: “One Battle After Another” and “Sinners” – how did auteur Paul Thomas Anderson deliver a film that (finally) satisfied the masses? And how did Ryan Coogler use the framework of a horror film to envelop the blood, sweat, and tears of the American South’s immigrant experience?
We compare the performances of Best Actor nominee Timothée Chalamet and winner Michael B. Jordan (if you’re curious about our hot takes on Timmy “Sweet Tea”, please head over to our Baihua Newsletter for the full debrief). We also share our love for directors Chloé Zhao and Jafar Panahi. In an era where the global world order is fracturing, is there still space for an America-centric narrative in Hollywood? Tune in to this episode to find out.
【时间轴 The When】
01:39：从杨紫琼到《K-pop猎魔女团》：亚裔在奥斯卡的“闭麦”困境
08:48：《罪人Sinners》深度解析：原创剧本、吸血鬼隐喻与真实的华裔移民史
21:24：最佳男主讨论：怎样才是最佳表演，我们为什么喜欢日漫宅男Michael B. Jordan
26:54：PTA 的《一战再战》：一代大师如何拍出“合群”的佳作
37:13：电影工业焦虑：竖屏电影、影院发短信与看不进长片的下一代
38:32：国际影片《情感价值》：细腻如“北欧杨德昌”的家庭剖析
46:41：赵婷的“修仙”片场
52:56：颁奖礼遗珠：伊朗导演贾法·帕纳西的《一场意外》
54:20：好莱坞的美国中心主义：这到底是“奥运会”还是“超级碗”？
57:34：电影行业新气象：选角奖首设与女性摄影师的历史性突破
01:39: From Michelle Yeoh to “KPop Demon Hunters”: Silencing Asians at the Oscars
08:48: Deep dive into “Sinners”: original screenplay in an era of sequels, vampire metaphors, and Chinese immigration history in the south
21:24: Best actor discussion: what defines a "best performance"? And why do we adore Michael B. Jordan
26:54: PTA’s “One Battle After Another“ -- how a master auteur crafted a "crowd-pleasing" masterpiece (finally)
37:13: Film industry’s ever-growing anxiety: vertical screens, texting in theaters, and a whole generation losing the ability to watch feature-length films
38:32: International feature “Sentimental Value”: a delicate and intimate look at a family’s anatomy
46:41: On the set of Chloe Zhao: her "transcendental" filmmaking style
52:56: Awards season snub: Jafar Panahi’s “It Was Just An Accident”
54:20: Hollywood’s America-centrism: is the Oscars the "Olympics" or the "Super Bowl"?
57:34: New frontiers in film: the inaugural casting award and historical breakthroughs for female cinematographers
Apart from the podcast, we have set up an official account on Xiaohongshu. We will periodically post content such as “CyberPink Reading,” “CyberPink Watching,” “CyberPink Traveling,” “CyberPink Vlog,” and more. Those are lighter, more fun and more experimental stuff about our lives. Leave us some comments on Xiaohongshu!
This snowy ski-town version of Sundance came with more than just white peaks — it also came with full bellies of millet porridge and some of the most unvarnished independent films around. In this episode, Xiaolan and Xiaoyang rate the films we saw at Sundance on a scale from banger to flop. From the devastating war-zone documentary American Doctor, to Bedford Park, the new Son Suk-ku film that had our cheeks lifted the entire time, to stories of female friendship in Tehran’s underground art scene — we talk about the trailblazers who left us completely fired up, and also roast, without mercy, the disasters that turn suffering into spectacle.
Baihua Newsletter has officially launched. We warmly invite listeners of CyberPink to subscribe.
If you’ve been listening to CyberPink or Mei Lun Mei Huan, or have joined our book clubs and offline events, you’ve already been part of the Baihua world. Now, we want to build that world in a more systematic and sustainable way.
Through Baihua, we aim to document what’s happening in the Chinese-language podcast sphere, trace the evolving public discourse on the Chinese internet, and explore how a generation of digital-native Chinese creators are surviving, creating, and speaking across what we call “parallel internets.”
The newsletter is bilingual. We — along with other Baihua contributors — will take turns writing.
Subscribe here: https://baihua.substack.com/
If you can't open the URL above, leave your email address here: https://wj.qq.com/s2/25773709/59ax/
当“信心”消失，欲望就变成了苦涩的愤怒和嘲讽。我们聊到了韩国电影中为了生存系统性谋杀竞争对手的失业男主，聊到了好莱坞自由主义叙事的全面崩塌，以及 Gen Z 为何不再相信《哈利·波特》式的英雄主义。在这样一个极化、原子化、被算法裹挟的时代，我们该如何寻找解药？答案或许在于做一些“低效”但具体的事情，比如给邻居送菜，比如慢慢地讲一个故事。
This episode is the final installment of our “Vibe Shift” trilogy.
After circling the theme for a long time, we finally found the right entry point: scarcity.
Scarcity here doesn’t only refer to economic downturns — Hollywood strikes, collapsing box office numbers, or the cost-of-living crisis. It points to something deeper: a collective psychological state in which the imagination of a better future has eroded.
When confidence disappears, desire curdles into resentment, sarcasm, and anger. We talk about a Korean film in which an unemployed man systemically eliminates his competitors just to survive. We discuss the collapse of Hollywood’s liberal narrative framework. We explore why Gen Z no longer believes in Harry Potter–style heroism.
In an era defined by polarization, atomization, and algorithmic manipulation, how do we find an antidote?
Perhaps the answer lies in doing things that feel inefficient but concrete — bringing vegetables to a neighbor, telling a story slowly and carefully.
00:00 What is “scarcity”? It’s not just financial lack, but a loss of faith in the future. When hope disappears, desire turns into anger and cynicism.
05:30 We begin with No Other Choice and Eddington. As resources shrink, other people become obstacles. The traditional male “provider” narrative collapses within the modern system.
12:11 The liberal narrative loses its grip. Audiences are exhausted by Hollywood moralizing. The Studio exposes paralysis within the cultural industry and its detachment from ordinary life.
23:36 A generational rupture. Why Gen Z no longer connects with 1990s optimism like Harry Potter. Raised amid polarization and stagnation, they no longer believe in a morally clear world.
36:00 We turn to nostalgia. Brad Pitt and F1 serve as a key example. The film constructs a world without political conflict — only winners and losers. Traditional masculinity is revived. “Daddy is still daddy.” It satisfies a longing for certainty and offers escape from complexity.
47:50 The return of gender roles. Love Is Blind and the tradwife phenomenon reflect a performative search for safety in a polarized age.
55:50 AI did not bring connection; it amplified division. We begin to question the myth of technological salvation. The technological optimism of Fantastic Four no longer holds.
1:23:30 The Western cost-of-living crisis deepens scarcity. Algorithms exploit anxiety and manufacture endless conflict. What does cyber-Balkanization of social networks mean?
1:35:30 Conclusion. Reject cynicism and begin with concrete action. Real human connection may be the only antidote to nihilism.
Apart from the podcast, we have set up an official account on Xiaohongshu. We will periodically post content such as “CyberPink Reading,” “CyberPink Watching,” “CyberPink Traveling,” “CyberPink Vlog,” and more. Those are lighter, more fun and more experimental stuff about our lives. Leave us some comments on Xiaohongshu!
In this episode, we discuss our favorite nepo baby Chloé Zhao’s new feature film Hamnet, adapted from the novel of the same name by Maggie O’Farrell. We explore why it can make you cry uncontrollably (or not cry at all and still fall deeply in love with it), and how its mystical, symbolic filmmaking evokes a Greek tragedy-like catharsis.
It is hard not to draw comparison with Wifedom, which we’ve talked about in the past. Is this yet another story of a literary giant draining the life out of the women around him? Or is it a timeless tragedy that transcends context to speak to the eternal human questions of life and death? When women are linked with nature, herbs, prophecy, and witch-like qualities—is it a gentle form of empowerment, or an older, more insidious trap? Is art merely performing pain, or is it offering humanity a way to keep going? Ultimately, remaking Shakespeare in 2025 takes courage—did Chloé Zhao deliver?
074 | 「一战再战」：告别宏大叙事，拥抱日常英雄 Beyond Grand Narratives, Toward Everyday Heroes
Dec 05, 2025
Show notes
【聊了什么The What】
本期节目，我们与哲学家袁源、友台美轮美换主播Lokin一同过度解读了保罗·托马斯·安德森（Paul Thomas Anderson）很有嚼劲的新作《一战再战》。这部电影是让小杨“撇着嘴进去，真香着出来”的年度惊喜，也是袁源觉得十分“就这”的陈词滥调。我们从加缪的《反叛者》出发，探讨暴力革命的伦理困境：当“妇人之仁”成为罪行，对抽象理念的狂热是否必然以牺牲具体的人为代价？Perfidia是一个挑战观众道德底线的反英雄，还是一位被男性凝视和刻板印象所困的复杂女性？Perfidia式的、为“爽”而战的景观式革命的反面，是否是Sensei式的、根植于邻里互助的日常英雄主义？
For this episode, we invited philosopher Yuan Yuan and Lokin to join us in over-interpreting Paul Thomas Anderson’s chewy new film One Battle After Another. It’s a movie that some of us walked into with doubts and walked out of utterly charmed, while others find it to be a thoroughly “meh” bundle of clichés.
Starting from Camus’s The Rebel, we dig into the ethical dilemmas of revolutionary violence: when “womanly compassion” becomes a crime, does fervor for an abstract ideal inevitably demand the sacrifice of concrete human lives? Is Perfidia a boundary-pushing anti-hero who defies our moral expectations, or a complex woman trapped within male gaze and stereotype? And if Perfidia’s spectacle-driven, pleasure-forward revolution is one end of the spectrum, is its opposite the Sensei style—an everyday heroism grounded in neighborly mutual aid?
In this episode, Xiao Lan and Xiao Yang dive into KATSEYE, the international K-pop girl group that's completely hooked us. This six-member group debuted to chart success and broke into the mainstream with hyperpop single "Gnarly." They radiate a chaotic, meme-able charm—"the prettiest mean girls who are also ride-or-die for you"—that feels more relaxed and subversive than previous girl groups.
But KATSEYE also represents K-pop's global expansion "qualitative shift." The HYBE and Geffen Records collaboration transplants K-pop's industrialized star-making system onto American soil. Their Netflix documentary Popstar Academy was a "Truman Show" forging strong personalities into polished products, where the line between "person" and "commodity" blurs. From market-driven diversity in member selection to Min Hee-jin's conflict with HYBE exposing creator struggles, we ask: is K-pop exporting culture—or a sophisticated apparatus of exploitation and control?
Here comes another vibe check with zero nutritional value—after observing the world’s current macro state, a few women decided to ease into the autumn-winter season by collectively embracing the mindset of “being at peace with being a little useless.”
Also, the internet is now overflowing with AI Generated Slop. In response, we couldn’t just sit back and do nothing. So, we used our actual brains to produce some organic human generated slop. Here’s to another joyful useless hour of pure vibes!
03:55 - Xiaolan’s high: Ireland is a great place, only 50 people live there and they all know each other
19:52 - Yifang’s low: How do we make sense of the contradictions in Taylor Swift’s new album? Taylor, are you okay?
41:16 - Xiaoyang’s high: G-Dragon, and why idols and fans should be equals
48:53 - A massager that saved our stiff necks and you should try it too
52:03 - Hana high: The Twilight Renaissance—the vampires are back; how emo vampire love stories hit differently once your prefrontal cortex is fully developed
071 | Vibe Shift 三部曲：保守女性气质的回潮 The Return of Conservative Femininity
Oct 13, 2025
Show notes
【聊了什么The What】
在“女权疲劳”与“woke倦怠”之后，美国流行文化正在经历一场“女性气质”的回潮（Vibe Shift）：保守女性气质重新流行起来。本期节目我们深入聊了姐妹会文化、MAGA美妆、还有TikTok上那些看似“非政治”的倡导健康生活的视频，是如何一步步把女性重新绑回“温柔、克制、顺从”的模子里，在无形中复活了反女性主义的观念。从阿拉巴马大学的 Bama Rush 现象到 Sydney Sweeney 的“cool girl”形象，这场Vibe Shift不仅是审美的变化，更是一种政治与文化的再编码，当流行文化把政治意识形态与个人价值混为一谈，什么样的女性故事被放大，又有哪些被抹去？
As part two of our Vibe Shift Trilogy, this episode dives into the return of conservative femininity in American pop culture today. We dive into pop culture moments such as Bama Rush, MAGA beauty trends on TikTok, the rise of wellness influencers and how their “apolitical” content is quietly reviving anti-feminist ideals of the olden days. The vibe shift isn’t just about aesthetics, but a recoding of culture and politics. In this shift, we question what kinds of stories of womanhood get amplified — and which are erased?
【时间轴 The When】
1:30: Sydney Sweeney 牛仔裤广告的争议，保守派审美的回归
8:00 “男人圈” vs “女人圈” 文化是如何通过健身、美容等“非政治”话题，随后逐渐渗入反女性主义和厌女的意识形态。
1:30 Sydney Sweeney and her jeans/genes and the return of the conservative femininity
8:00 – “manosphere” vs “womanosphere” cultures use seemingly non-political topics like fitness and beauty to gradually introduce anti-feminist and misogynistic ideologies
11:20 – top women’s health podcasts in the “womanosphere” spread conservative femininity, promoting the idea that “Health = Beauty = Morality”
14:20 – Fatigue with liberal female narratives opens the door for conservative messaging
23:48 – Examining ideals of Southern conservative femininity through Bama Rush and Greek life
38:44 – The reinvention of the feminist ideal: securing a reliable partner and what that means for society
Apart from the podcast, we have set up an official account on Xiaohongshu. We will periodically post content such as “CyberPink Reading,” “CyberPink Watching,” “CyberPink Traveling,” “CyberPink Vlog,” and more. Those are lighter, more fun and more experimental stuff about our lives. Leave us some comments on Xiaohongshu!
Our TOPPODCAST Picks 
Stay Connected
