TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Words & Numbers

    Words & Numbers is one of the highest-rated economics podcasts in the world. Each episode, Antony Davies and James R. Harrigan dig into economics, political science, and current events to explain what’s actually happening and why it matters.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Creative Commons

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 112: The Origins of the Social Contract, Part 1 Apr 03, 2019
    Show notes

    Have you ever signed a contract without reading the terms and conditions? According to Elizabeth Warren, part of the “social contract” is to pay your fair share. But wait, what is the “social contract” that politicians and talking heads keep bringing up? Is it the consent of the governed? Is it written down? Did anyone actually agree to it? Enjoy the first part of a two-part special as Antony Davies and James Harrigan dig up the historical origins of the social contract.

    Quick hits

    Tversky & Kahneman, Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions

    Robots in grocery stores

    FEEcon VIP Giveaway

    https://info.fee.org/wordsandnumbers

    Foolishness of the week

    Special Olympics 1

    Special Olympics 2

    Topic of the week: Social Contract Nonsense (Part 1)

    Locke’s Social Contract

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Let us know what you think at wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 111: Game of Votes: Electoral vs. Popular Mar 27, 2019
    Show notes

    538 Electors. 270 votes. Winner-takes-all! Well, at least for now. Colorado recently became the twelfth state to join an effort to award the presidency to the candidate who wins the most individual votes. But should the popular vote replace the Electoral College? Originally intended as a safeguard for the separation of powers, has this election method failed Americans? Population vs. Geography. Urban vs. Rural. Democrats vs. Republicans; it’s a conversation that usually gets people all lathered up on both sides of the issue. Join James Harrigan and Antony Davies as they inform us about the reasoning behind the Electoral College and how it works.

    Show Notes:

    Adidas making sneakers out of waste plastic

    China stops taking the world’s trash

    No place for US recyclables

    Nuclear energy better than renewables

    Foolishness of the week

    Police shoot teachers

    Milgram experiment

    Topic of the week

    Electoral College

    Contract Clause

    Federalist 68

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 110: Is Facebook a Monopoly? Mar 20, 2019
    Show notes

    The dominating online presence of Facebook, Google, and Amazon has often been called monopolistic. Government-enforced monopolies, such as Western Union and Ma Bell, have fallen before, but is Big Tech anything like those old companies? Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren has even started a petition calling for the breakup of big tech companies, which may include Apple among others. How would the digital world look if she succeeds? Should politicians get to decide whether Facebook meets the same fate as MySpace or should the consumer? Join us this week as James Harrigan and Antony Davies thwart the misconceptions about monopolies and discuss the fates of tech products like Netscape and Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.

    Show Notes:

    Buying your way into college

    New York City wants to ban “unfair” firings

    Foolishness of the week

    Missouri wants to require residents to own AR-15s

    Topic of the week

    Elizabeth Warren wants to break up Facebook

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 109: Are You In the Global 1%? Mar 13, 2019
    Show notes

    Live from Scottsdale, Arizona! James Harrigan and Antony Davies contend that the median income in the US puts Americans in the top 1 percent in the world. What does that mean? Only that these people can afford stuff that, roughly a century ago, had been considered luxuries: air conditioning, running hot and cold water, ovens, refrigerators, stainless steel, and even sweet potatoes. The standard of living for even minimum wage earners today has remarkably improved in spite of burdensome regulations, but can this trend continue? Join us this week as our hosts suss out the reasons for the improvements in worldwide wealth and search for the “Goldilocks Zone” of government intervention.

    Show Notes:

    Measles outbreak at Midway airport

    Gap, JC Penny, Foot Locker closures

    Montgomery Ward

    Foolishness of the week

    Sanders: Government can’t go too far

    Topic of the week

    Where did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez get her sweet potatoes?

    World median income

    Are you a 1-percenter?

    Donald Boudreaux on insider trading

    What would our GDP be if we had less unnecessary regulation?

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 108: Where Are They Now? The Disappearance of Mutual Aid Societies. Mar 06, 2019
    Show notes

    This week’s guest, David Beito, professor of History at the University of Alabama, discusses the functions, benefits, and undoing of mutual aid societies. These private safety nets, like tontine funds and Masons, once widely provided services such as health and unemployment insurances, hospitals, housing for the elderly, and care for orphans. So what happened? Did beneficiaries dry up these funds? Did scandals, state bans, and the Great Depression lead to the disappearance of benefit societies? Are they still around? Join James Harrigan, Antony Davies, and professor Beito as they answer these questions and more on Words & Numbers.

    Show Notes:

    Male-only draft unconstitutional

    Humanity’s backup plan

    Foolishness of the week

    AOC says people shouldn’t reproduce

    Topic of the week

    Mutual aid societies

    Tontine insurance

    David Beito

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at:

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 107: Modern Monetary Theory The Government as Referee, Player, and Scorekeeper Feb 27, 2019
    Show notes

    This week, economist and theorist Warren Mosler joins James and Antony to explain the details of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). With 40 years of experience in finance and monetary operations, Mosler is a leading expert on MMT, is a co-founder of AVM—a brokerage, trading, and administrative services firm—and lectures on monetary economics around the world. He covers the important ramifications stemming from the adoption of MMT and how coercive shifts of resources benefit public infrastructure, and responds to criticisms of MMT. With supporters in Washington such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, MMT is quickly gaining a strong following, and Warren, James, and Antony discuss the important points on this winding theory and more.

    Show Notes:

    People killed in armed conflicts

    People killed by mosquitoes

    Genetically modified mosquitoes

    Foolishness of the week

    TSA smuggling ring

    Topic of the week

    Modern Monetary Theory

    Warren Mosler

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at:

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 106: Can Anti-Discrimination Laws Get Us Closer to a Meritocracy? Feb 20, 2019
    Show notes

    Discrimination happens every single day. Every human, in some way, makes a judgment about other humans and uses that judgment to discriminate, whether that be who they date, who they do business with, and, yes, who they hire and fire. Most discrimination is fine—necessary, even. But sometimes it crosses a line. Where is that line? How does it affect people’s careers? When is litigation the right option? Antony Davies and James Harrigan with special guest Vince White as they discuss this and more on Words & Numbers.

    Show Notes:

    Online dating is changing society

    Amazon paid no federal taxes

    Foolishness of the week

    Amazon took its ball and went home

    Topic of the week

    Federal employment discrimination laws

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at:

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 105: The “Problem” with Billionaires Feb 13, 2019
    Show notes

    The Outrage Engine that is social media and op-eds has set its sights on a new target: billionaires. Apparently, being a billionaire is a bad, bad thing. Billionaires should sit down, shut up, and meekly wait until we confiscate their wealth. For certain people of certain political beliefs, this sounds like a great idea. Because, after all, nobody needs that much money. But is it really that simple? Can we really just steal billionaires’ money and nothing bad happens? Join James Harrigan and Antony Davies as they breakdown this and more on Words and Numbers.

    Quick hits

    Redditors are kind to a person in need

    Hawaii tries to ban smoking 1

    Hawaii tries to ban smoking 2

    Foolishness of the week

    Green New Deal Resolution

    Topic of the week

    Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax plan

    How an income tax on the rich expanded to be a tax on everyone

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at:

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 104: “You Just Hate the Poor!” and Other Minimum Wage Misunderstandings Feb 06, 2019
    Show notes

    Fun fact: the profit margin for most businesses is about 8 percent. When you’re talking about categories like restaurants and retail stores, that margin drops to around 2 percent. Yet, some people still seem to believe that all companies are perfectly capable of simply absorbing dramatic increases in their operating costs—namely, labor—with no changes in behavior by these companies. Artificially inflating labor costs, as in the form of minimum wage increases, will not lead to decreased hours, lay-offs, deferred hiring, decreases in benefits, or increased prices for consumers because… reasons. And if you voice disagreement with any of these beliefs, then you must just hate the poor or other ad hominem claims. But who really “hates” the poor based on actual policy outcomes, the #FightFor15 crowd or those who oppose minimum wage hikes? Join Antony Davies and James Harrigan as they dig into this and more on this week’s episode of Words and Numbers.

    Quick hits

    AOC ruffles feathers

    Lyft offers free rides to shelters

    Foolishness of the week

    Seeing racism where it’s not

    Topic of the week: “You Just Hate the Poor!” and Other Minimum Wage Misunderstandings

    Analysis of Minimum Wage in Pennsylvania

    Census data on household incomes

    Bureau of Labor Statistics data on minimum wage workers

    A $15 minimum wage hurts workers

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Let us know what you think at

    wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 103: What Does “Necessary and Proper” Actually Mean? Jan 30, 2019
    Show notes

    Though the United States, as a constitutional republic, is considered to be a “limited government,” it often doesn’t feel that way. Washington keeps churning out law after law regarding what the state may do and what the individual may not. The fault for this is often laid at the feet of the Founders for including the “Necessary and Proper Clause” in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. But is that blame just? Or have politicians through the years simply used it as an excuse to do what they wanted, regardless of what the Constitution says? Join James Harrigan and Antony Davies as they talk about this and more on this week’s episode of Words and Numbers.

    Show Notes:

    Judge convicts volunteers

    Nancy Pelosi on inequality

    Foolishness of the week

    Wealth tax

    Senators’ oath of office

    Topic of the week: Diversity Officers and Administrative Bloat in Higher Education

    How much of government shuts down?

    Article 1, Section 8

    10th Amendment

    16th Amendment

    Wickard v. Filburn

    Join the conversation

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Previous 1 41 42 43 44 45 54 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights