TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Words & Numbers

    Words & Numbers is one of the highest-rated economics podcasts in the world. Each episode, Antony Davies and James R. Harrigan dig into economics, political science, and current events to explain what’s actually happening and why it matters.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Creative Commons

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 122: Changing the Rules for Social Security Jun 12, 2019
    Show notes

    As the saying goes, if you want less of something, tax it. Recently, a House bill was proposed that would raise the taxable income cap for Social Security to about $400,000. Although there seem to be many reasons to cheer, would this create unintended consequences? What could be done instead? Is privatization the way to go? Join James Harrigan and Antony Davies this week as they suggest an elegant solution to a sticky situation on this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Show your support for Words & Numbers at Patreon

    https://www.patreon.com/wordsandnumbers

    Quick hits

    Ladybugs:

    https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-06-06/cloud-of-ladybugs-in-california-so-large-it-appears-on-weather-radar

    Influencer can’t sell 26 shirts:

    https://www.indy100.com/article/instagram-influencer-arii-t-shirt-sales-followers-fail-twitter-response-8936836

    Foolishness of the week

    Over-the-counter birth control:

    https://www.livescience.com/24940-birth-control-pill-over-the-counter.html

    Topic of the week: Social Security

    The SECURE Act:

    https://www.bankrate.com/retirement/how-secure-act-could-impact-retirement-savings/

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/130029457649243/

    Let us know what you think:

    mailto:wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Antony Davies on Twitter:

    https://twitter.com/antonydavies

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter:

    https://twitter.com/JamesRHarrigan

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 121: Are Hot Button Issues Actually Important? Jun 05, 2019
    Show notes

    If life is an inalienable right, does that take the death penalty off the table? Is there really a need for social safety nets? Taxation, the Articles of Confederation, the Postal Service, and more come together this week as James Harrigan and Antony Davies explore their ambivalence (it doesn’t mean what you might think it does) on many controversial topics on this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Come to FEEcon 2019! Show Notes:

    Arthur Laffer awarded Medal of Freedom

    The top half of income earners pay 97% of the federal taxes

    Spelling Bee winners

    Foolishness of the week

    UBI could solve childhood obesity

    Topic of the week: Ambivalence

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Show your support for Words & Numbers at Patreon

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 120: What Is Impeachment and How Does It Work? May 29, 2019
    Show notes

    Only twice has the U.S. House of Representatives impeached a president, and never has the Senate voted to remove an impeached president from office. People tend to think of impeachment as a judicial tool that should be used rarely and only when a president has broken the law in some egregious way. But impeachment was designed as part of the checks-and-balances. It is a political tool. On this week’s episode of Words & Numbers, join Antony Davies and James Harrigan as they discuss what impeachment is and how the political process might work better if impeachment were used more often.

    Come to FEEcon 2019! Show Notes:

    Artificial intelligence learns to spot cancer

    Employment changes over the past century

    Sanders says that teacher salaries should start at $60,000

    Foolishness of the week

    MSNBC asks political candidate how MSNBC can do better for him

    Topic of the week: Impeachment

    How does impeachment work?

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 119: Words & Numbers Listener Special #3 May 22, 2019
    Show notes

    If the federal government disappeared, would there still be a United States? Does every country fall on a spectrum between two extremes, capitalism and communism? Are there any good reasons to restrict voting rights? This week, James Harrigan and Antony Davies answer questions about the subjective theory of value, debts to society, guns vs. butter, and plenty more in this week’s jam-packed episode of Words & Numbers.

    Come to FEEcon 2019!

    Foolishness of the week

    Pennsylvania Mayors

    Pew Poll on Views About Gun Regulation

    Topic of the week: Listener questions

    Join the conversation:

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 118: Household Debt: The Good, the Bad, and the Politicized May 15, 2019
    Show notes

    Americans, as individuals, carry a lot of debt. But don’t panic! Not all debt is created equal, and not all debt is necessarily a bad thing. Some debt—like mortgages, vehicles, even some college degrees—can be good debt. There are also bad kinds of debt, too. But the thing about individual debt is that it’s the individual's responsibility and really only the business of the borrower and the lender. Once the government gets involved, though, things can get messy. Just how messy and in what ways? Join Antony Davies and James Harrigan as they sort through the bills in this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Come to FEEcon 2019! Show Notes:

    Amazon hiring robots

    $6 trillion war

    Foolishness of the week:

    Limiting credit card interest rates

    Topic of the week: Good debt and bad debt:

    Household debt

    Join the conversation:

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 117: What’s Your Fair Share? May 08, 2019
    Show notes

    Lately, headlines seem to focus on big companies that pay no corporate taxes. However, most of those big companies are still paying payroll taxes. So, have these big companies actually paid their fair share? Americans have their own tax burdens as well. How do we measure a fair tax for all incomes? How do people define what “fair” means? Join James Harrigan and Antony Davies as they cover progressive/regressive taxes, sales taxes, sin taxes, and more on this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Come to FEEcon 2019!

    Show Notes:

    New York may ban glass and steel buildings

    Scientists discover how to convert blood to Type O

    Foolishness of the week:

    Treasury: US may have to stop borrowing

    Topic of the week: Taxes

    Amazon 1

    Amazon 2

    Join the conversation:

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Thought Experiment: Should the government tax buyers or sellers?

    Consider the following three scenarios. In all three scenarios, a seller sets a price and a buyer decides, based on the price, how many units to buy. The number of units the seller sells varies depending on the price the seller charges:

    Units sold = 100 - Price per unit

    For simplicity (and no meaningful reduction in realism) suppose that it costs the seller $40 for each unit the seller sells. In the first scenario there is no tax. This is a baseline against which we can compare the scenarios in which there is a tax. In the second scenario, the government imposes a $6 per unit tax on the seller. For each unit the seller sells, the seller must pay (in addition to the $40 cost of selling the unit) $6 to the government. In the third scenario, the government imposes a $6 per unit tax on the buyer. For each unit the buyer sells, the buyer must pay the seller’s price to the seller plus an additional $6 to the government.

    In each scenario, you can see the price that maximizes the seller’s profit. This is the price the seller will charge in that scenario. You can check the work by choosing a different price. You’ll see that any price other than the one shown results in less profit. At the end of each scenario, you see the final result: how much the buyer pays per unit and how much the seller receives per unit. Compare those results across the three scenarios to see something remarkable.

    Scenario 1: No Sales Tax

    Profit is maximum when the seller charges $70 per unit.

    Units sold = 100 - 70 = 30

    Sales = $70 x 30 units = $2,100

    Cost of goods sold = $40 x 30 units = $1,200

    Profit = $2,100 - $1,200 = $900

    → Buyer pays $70 per unit

    → Seller receives $70 per unit

    Tax the Seller $6 per Unit Sold

    Profit is maximum when the seller charges $73 per unit.

    Units sold = 100 - 73 = 27

    Sales = $73 x 27 = $1,971

    Cost of goods sold = $40 x 27 + $6 x 27 = $1,242

    Profit = $1,971 - $1,242 = $729

    → Buyer pays $73 per unit

    → Seller receives $73 per unit less $6 per unit tax = $67 per unit

    → Compared to No Tax, buyer pays $3 per unit more and seller receives $3 per unit less

    Tax the Buyer $6 per Unit Purchased

    Profit is maximum when the seller charges $67 per unit.

    Units sold = 100 - 67 = 27

    Sales = $67 x 27 = $1,809

    Cost of goods sold = $40 x 27 = $1,080

    Profit = $1,809 - $1,080 = $729

    → Buyer pays $73 per unit ($67 per unit plus $6 per unit tax)

    → Seller receives $67 per unit

    → Compared to No Tax, buyer pays $3 per unit more and seller receives $3 per unit less

    Conclusion

    It doesn’t matter whether the government taxes the buyer or the seller, they end up sharing the tax burden in the same way. The government decides from whom the tax is collected. The market determines who actually pays the tax.

    No Tax

    Tax the Seller

    Tax the Buyer

    Sale price

    $70

    $73

    $67

    Price seller receives (net of tax)

    $70

    $73 - $6 = $67

    $67

    Price buyer pays (including tax)

    $70

    $73

    $67 + $6 = $73

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 116: What Happens When We Make College “Free”? May 01, 2019
    Show notes

    There’s no such thing as a free lunch or, in this case, a free college education, despite the promises of certain presidential candidates. The federal government already guarantees student loans. But what would happen if we just forgave all that student debt? What would it take, politically speaking, and what would it cost? And what’s the value of a college education these days, anyway? Join Antony Davies and James Harrigan as they tackle the topic on this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Win tickets to FEEcon 2019!

    Quick hits

    Chalk on tires violates Fourth Amendment

    Phone surveillance

    Foolishness of the week

    Williams College is afraid of free speech

    Tuition at Williams College

    Tuition at University of Massachusetts

    Topic of the week: Free stuff is too good to be true

    Free college too good to be true

    Constitutional concerns about a wealth tax

    Wealth tax

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 115: The Campus Witch Trials Apr 24, 2019
    Show notes

    Many college students seem baffled or even outraged by opinions that differ from their own. We hear phrases like safe spaces, trigger warnings, and virtue signaling. What’s going on? Has the same psychology that caused religious persecutions returned? Has it infected the majority of students and faculty across the country, or just a vocal few? Guest Donald Boudreaux joins hosts James Harrigan and Antony Davies to sift through the loudest arguments coming from our nation’s universities in this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Win tickets to FEEcon 2019!

    Show Notes:

    Nuclear fusion

    Artificial intelligence

    Cancer cure

    Longevity gene

    Cure for bubble boy disease

    Brian Lamb retiring

    Foolishness of the week:

    San Francisco: Poop in the streets

    Washington DC: Homelessness

    Seattle is dying

    Topic of the week: Silencing Dissent

    Donald Boudreaux

    Donald Boudreaux on Brett Kavanaugh and GMU

    Join the conversation:

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 114: Is It Ok to Pay People for Their Blood Plasma? Apr 17, 2019
    Show notes

    Getting paid for your blood—do you have any concerns? Many people are opposed to donors receiving compensation for ethical reasons. Should people only donate blood for altruistic reasons? Should we worry about exploitation? How much of America’s total exports are blood products? Join Antony Davies, James Harrigan, and their guest Peter Jaworski, co-author of the book Markets Without Limits, as they discuss the morality underlying the supply and demand of blood plasma around the world.

    Win tickets to FEEcon 2019! Show Notes:

    Deficit up 15% in 2019

    Deficit up 17% in 2018

    Tourism and Chernobyl

    Foolishness of the week:

    Illinois to raise smoking age to 21

    Florida town makes it illegal to grow vegetables

    State of Florida overrules Florida town

    Topic of the week: Blood plasma sales:

    Peter Jaworski

    Letter to Senate of Canada regarding the ban on blood plasma sales

    Canada needs blood plasma

    We should pay for blood plasma donations

    Bans on blood plasma sales 1

    Bans on blood plasma sales 2

    Don’t end NAFTA, Canada needs your bodily fluids

    Join the conversation:

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Peter Jaworski on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Let us know what you think at: wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Episode 113: The Origins of the Social Contract, Part 2 Apr 10, 2019
    Show notes

    Wage gap myths, middle class success, and hate crime statistics are examined this week in order to dispel the calls for a new social contract. In a society where the majority makes the rules, how do minorities prosper? Is it because of a social contract, is it the result of people being rational, or is it just people being nice to each other? Listen to the conclusion of this two-part special as James Harrigan and Antony Davies use data to trace the prosperity of minority groups in America on this week’s episode of Words & Numbers.

    Win tickets to FEEcon 2019!

    Show Notes:

    13 year old buys his mother a car

    Cancer vaccine

    Foolishness of the week

    Illinois to raise smoking age to 21

    Florida town makes it illegal to grow vegetables

    State of Florida overrules Florida town

    Topic of the week: Social Contract Nonsense (Part 2)

    Households by race and income (1967-2017)

    Income by gender (1960-2017)

    Hate crime statistics

    Join the conversation

    Words & Numbers Backstage

    Antony Davies on Twitter

    James R. Harrigan on Twitter

    Antony Davies on Minds.com

    James R. Harrigan on Minds.com

    Let us know what you think at wordsandnumberspodcast@gmail.com






    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices


    Previous 1 40 41 42 43 44 54 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights