TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Philosophy

    Very Bad Wizards

    Very Bad Wizards is a podcast featuring a philosopher (Tamler Sommers) and a psychologist (David Pizarro), who share a love for ethics, pop culture, and cognitive science, and who have a marked inability to distinguish sacred from profane. Each podcast includes discussions of moral philosophy, recent work on moral psychology and neuroscience, and the overlap between the two.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 127: Moral Luck Nov 14, 2017
    Show notes

    David and Tamler dip back into the Thomas Nagel well, and discuss the problem of "moral luck." Why do we blame drunk drivers who hit someone more than drunk drivers who make it home OK? Why do we judge people for things that are beyond their control (when we have strong intuitions that uncontrollable acts don't deserve blame)? Does moral luck ultimately swallow all of our behavior? Can we truly embrace the view that "actions are events and people are things" or are we stuck with another unsolvable clash of competing perspectives (just like the problem of absurdity)?

    Plus, Dave exposes himself on the Partially Examined Life, Tamler self-censors, and somehow we discuss Hollywood harassment and stand-up comedy without mentioning Louis CK. (But only because we recorded this episode about five hours before the NY Times story broke.)

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Nagel, T. (2012). Mortal questions. Cambridge University Press. [amazon.com affiliate link]
    • Nagel, T. Moral Luck.
    • Moral Luck (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
    • Intentional stance [wikipedia.org]
    • The Partially Examined Life Episode 176 Situationism in Psych: Milgram & Stanford Prison Experiments (Part One) — Part one of the PEL episode with David
    • The Partially Examined Life Episode 176 Situationism in Psych: Milgram & Stanford Prison Experiments (Part Two)
    • The Partially Examined Life Episode 93: Freedom and Responsibility (Strawson vs Strawson) — Tamler's appearance on PEL

    Episode 126: The Absurd Oct 24, 2017
    Show notes

    Is life meaningless? Are humans just glorified dung beetles, pushing around our piles of poop with no greater purpose? What would it take for life to actually be meaningful? In this episode, Tamler and David discuss Thomas Nagel's essay on the sense of meaninglessness and absurdity that can so easily creep into human existence (with a special emphasis on the work of Camus and the philosophy of Rick and Morty). But first we tackle even more important questions about the human condition such as, why is it easier to detect the size of a hole with your tongue than with your little finger? And which moral "dilemmas" are actually moral no-brainers? (In the process, we even solve the problem of free speech on campus. You're welcome.)

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • The Extent of Skin Bending Rather Than Action Possibilities Explains Why Holes Feel Larger With the Tongue Than With the Finger. - PubMed - NCBI
    • Pure joy: a colorblind man sees color for the first time
    • Dan Harmon Reveals the Meaning of Life in RICK AND MORTY | Nerdist
    • Microcosmos - Dung beetle rolls ball and gets stuck. - YouTube
    • Nagel, T. (1971). The absurd. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(20), 716-727.
    • Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. Vintage.

    Episode 125: Can You Feel It? Oct 10, 2017
    Show notes

    What do we mean when we say someone is angry? Can we identify anger (or any other emotion) via facial expressions, physiological changes, or neural markers? Is anger simply a feeling, something that happens to us, or does it involve a judgment? How much control do we have over our emotions, and can we be responsible for them? We talk about the work of Lisa Feldman Barrett and Bob Solomon. Plus, Tamler engages in conceptual analysis on Star Trek transporter beliefs (yes you read that right) and David is too stunned to argue.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Yale's Paul Bloom to receive $1 million Klaus Jacobs Prize | YaleNews
    • Solomon, R. C. (1973). Emotions and choice. The Review of Metaphysics, 20-41.
    • What Emotions Are (and Aren't) - The New York Times
    • Are Emotions Natural Kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science - Lisa Feldman Barrett, 2006

    Episode 124: Dr. Strawson or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Episodic Life Sep 26, 2017
    Show notes

    Do you think of your life as a story? Does your life have a narrative structure or form? Do you identify with your past selves and your future selves? If not, can you live a good life, a moral life, an authentic life? Can you feel guilt, regret, and resentment? Plus, speaking of stories, we talk about a new study suggesting that books with anthropomorphic animals can't teach moral lessons to kids.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Larsen, N. E., Lee, K., & Ganea, P. A. (2017). Do storybooks with anthropomorphized animal characters promote prosocial behaviors in young children?. Developmental Science.
    • Children's books with humans have greater moral impact than animals, study finds | Books | The Guardian
    • Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428-452.
    • Strawson, G. (2007). Episodic ethics. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 85-115.
    • Parfit, D. (1995). The unimportance of identity.
    • I am Not a Story

    Episode 123: What Chilling Effect? (Intelligence Pt. 2) Sep 12, 2017
    Show notes

    It's Part 2 of the Patreon listener selected episode! David and Tamler continue their discussion on intelligence from our last episode by tackling the radioactive topic of group differences and IQ. Are there reliable differences in IQ across races? Given that IQ is strongly heritable, and that racial categories are based (in part) on biological differences, does it follow that group differences in IQ are due to biological differences across racial groups? (Could only a politically motivated science-denier conclude otherwise?) David argues that biological explanations for racial differences in IQ are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of genetics and race. It's a complex argument, so if you start listening, please finish! (Oh and @VBW_No_Context on Twitter, take a vacation, you've earned it!). Plus, more on neuroscientific explanations, and Tamler relates his experience of Hurricane Harvey.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Race & IQ: Debate Serves No Purpose | National Review
    • Returning to the race and IQ debate | Glenn Loury & John McWhorter [The Glenn Show] - YouTube
    • Race & IQ: Don't Obsess Over It, but Do Discuss It | National Review
    • Templeton, A. R. (1998). Human races: a genetic and evolutionary perspective. American Anthropologist, 100(3), 632-650. Chicago
    • Study Finds Africans More Genetically Diverse Than Other Populations
    • Human penis size - Wikipedia

    Episode 122: Nothing but a "G" Thing (Intelligence Pt. 1) Aug 29, 2017
    Show notes

    David and Tamler do their best to talk frankly about intelligence and IQ research. (It's our Patreon listener-selected topic! We probably would never have chosen this one on our own...). Is intelligence a meaningful, definable concept? Can we reliably test for it? How much of the variability in IQ across individuals is due to heritable factors? Are people with higher IQ happier, wealthier, or healthier than people with lower IQ? And why is this topic so controversial anyhow? Plus in the intro segment Tamler and David discuss why you probably don't need fMRI to know what your dog wants, and why cognitive neuroscience seems to confuse otherwise intelligent folks. (Note: This is Part 1 of our discussion on intelligence. In Part 2 will delve into the slightly more controversial topics of IQ, race, and gender).

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • What Does Your Dog Really Want? - Scientific American Blog Network
    • A Very Bad Wizard: Morality behind the curtain by Tamler Sommers [amazon.com affiliate link] — David does the links, so it's him telling you to support Tamler and buy his book!
    • The Simpsons - Crayon in Homer's brain - YouTube
    • Ritchie, S. (2015). Intelligence: All that matters. Hodder & Stoughton. [amazon.com affiliate link] — Stuart Ritchie's very well-written primer on intelligence. Accessible to a wide audience, but with all the nuance you'd expect from a clear-thinking academic. It's also a very quick read.
    • Stuart Ritchie (@StuartJRitchie) | Twitter
    • Stuart Ritchie | The University of Edinburgh

    Episode 121: The Beauty of Illusion - David Lynch's "Mulholland Drive" Aug 15, 2017
    Show notes

    Guest Yoel Inbar joins David and Tamler to break down David Lynch's dreamy masterpiece Mulholland Drive. (FULL SPOILERS – watch before you listen!) What's real and what's illusion? What happens when our illusions unravel? How do expectations affect our experience? How can artists use our expectations to manipulate our emotions? Come for the questions, stay for the answers – or at least for more questions.

    Special Guest: Yoel Inbar.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Mulholland Drive (2001) - IMDb
    • Everything you were afraid to ask about "Mulholland Drive" - Salon.com
    • Film Crit Hulk Smash: HULK VS. THE GENIUS OF MULHOLLAND DRIVE | Birth.Movies.Death.
    • David Lynch Signature Cup Organic Coffee | Organic Coffee | JavaDistribution.com
    • Urban Dictionary: fuck tab

    Episode 120: Clap Your Hand for Robert Wright Jul 25, 2017
    Show notes

    Special guest Robert Wright joins the podcast to discuss his latest book "Why Buddhism is True." What is the Buddhist conception of not-self? When we become aware that the boundaries between us and the world are fluid, what is the "we" that arrives at this insight? Can daily meditation make you less of a dick? How does evolutionary psychology bear on these questions? Plus, Dave horrifies Tamler with his new hipster habit.

    Special Guest: Robert Wright.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • One-Hand Clapping Kōan [wikipedia.org]
    • Robert Wright (journalist) - Wikipedia
    • Robert Wright's Website
    • Pre-order "Why Buddhism Is True" by Robert Wright [amazon.com affiliate link]
    • Break music: Try Harder by peez | Free Listening on SoundCloud

    Episode 119: A Brief History of Values Jul 12, 2017
    Show notes

    What happens when we discover why we believe the things we believe? What if we discover that our values are the product of our cultural tradition, or personal experience, or natural selection? Should we be more skeptical of our values once we learn their history? Plus, data on Google porn searches reveal that you're all a bunch of sick fucks.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Proof that Americans are lying about their sexual desires - Vox
    • Doris, J. M. (2009). Genealogy and Evidence: Prinz on the History of Morals.
    • Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Noûs, 45(1), 103-125.
    • The Splintered Mind: Tamler Sommers
    • Break Music: Everything Is Wrong by peez

    Episode 118: We Don't Love Them Hoax Jun 28, 2017
    Show notes

    David and Tamler try to put the topic of campus politics to bed once and for all – with limited success. First, we get into a big fight about the prevalence and danger of political correctness in American universities. We junked that recording, and tried to distill our best points into a new one. (Trust us – it was for the best.) We also narrow down all the topic recommendations from our beloved Patreon supporters to five finalists. In the second segment, James Lindsay (co-author of the "Conceptual Penis" hoax) joins us to talk about why he thinks the hoax was more successful in exposing gender studies than some of their critics (including us) have suggested.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • James Lindsay (@GodDoesnt) | Twitter
    • James Lindsay's Website (God Doesn't; We Do)
    • Skeptic » Reading Room » The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct: A Sokal-Style Hoax on Gender Studies
    • Alan Sokal: Some Thoughts on "The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct" Hoax
    • Break Music: Dusted by peez [soundcloud.com]

    Previous 1 22 23 24 25 26 36 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Rationally Speaking Podcast

    1

    Rationally Speaking Podcast Natural Science
    Another Round

    2

    Another Round Arts
    Stuff Mom Never Told You

    3

    Stuff Mom Never Told You Philosophy
    In The Rabbit Hole

    4

    In The Rabbit Hole Philosophy
    The Gray Area with Sean Illing

    5

    The Gray Area with Sean Illing Education
    The Art of Manliness

    6

    The Art of Manliness Education
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights