TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Philosophy

    Very Bad Wizards

    Very Bad Wizards is a podcast featuring a philosopher (Tamler Sommers) and a psychologist (David Pizarro), who share a love for ethics, pop culture, and cognitive science, and who have a marked inability to distinguish sacred from profane. Each podcast includes discussions of moral philosophy, recent work on moral psychology and neuroscience, and the overlap between the two.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 157: Notes From Underground (Pt. 2) Feb 05, 2019
    Show notes

    David and Tamler continue their discussion of Dostoevsky's funny, sad, philosophical novella Notes From Underground. We focus on part 2 this time - three stories from the Underground Man's past - and explore what the stories tell us about his existentialist rants in part 1. Is he consumed with guilt over his treatment of Liza? Is he ashamed of his social awkwardness, low status, and self-destructive behavior? Or is he a narcissistic proto-incel suffering from an especially acute case of spotlight effect? (As usual, the answer is probably some combination of all these and more.) Plus, we select the finalists for our Patreon-listener selected episode. Thanks to everyone for their support!

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Notes from Underground - Wikipedia
    • Notes From Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky [amazon.com affiliate link]

    Episode 156: Notes From Underground (Pt. 1) Jan 22, 2019
    Show notes

    We're sick men. We're spiteful men. We're unpleasant men. We think our livers are diseased (especially Tamler's). So we talk about Dostoevsky's wild, complex, stream of consciousness masterpiece Notes From Underground. For this episode we focus on part 1 of the novella, and the philosophy behind it. Is the underground man an existentialist hero affirming his freedom in the face of a deterministic hyper-rationalist worldview? Or is he a lonely man consumed with guilt and self-loathing, constructing a pretentious post-hoc rationalization of his character and behavior? Plus, the American Psychological Association just issued guidelines for how to treat men who embrace traditional masculine ideologies. Is the backlash justified?

    This episode is brought to you by Eero, Curiosity Stream, and the generosity of listeners like you.

    Sponsored By:

    • Eero Promo Code: VERYBADWIZARDS
    • CuriosityStream Promo Code: VBW

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • 'Traditional Masculinity' Can Be Harmful, Psychologists Find - The Atlantic
    • APA 'Masculinity' Guidelines Face a Title IX Challenge at Harvard University, for Discriminating Against Men in Psychology
    • Notes from the Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky (trans. by Constance Garnett) [amazon.com affiliate link]
    • Notes from Underground - Wikipedia

    Episode 155: Alfred Hitchcock's Money Shot Jan 08, 2019
    Show notes

    David and Tamler dive deep into Alfred Hitchcock's 1958 hallucinatory classic, Vertigo. Why does this movie seem to gain stature among critics and academics every year? Is this a really a exploration of Hitchcock's own obsessions and sexual repression? Is it a story about filmmaking and celebrity? Or is it just a twisty noir thriller about a man who has no job and can't kiss to save his life? Plus, some thoughts about bad reviews on Rate My Professor and why it's hard to get feedback about job performance in academia.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Relax (Short film by Matthew Herbertz)
    • Bob Einstein on "The Ringer" podcast
    • Vertigo (film) - Wikipedia
    • Vertigo | Scanners | Roger Ebert

    Episode 154: Metaphysical Vertigo (Borges's "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius") Dec 18, 2018
    Show notes

    In the famous words of the idealist philosopher George Berkeley, "To exist is to be perceived." Our ideas and perceptions are the fundamental objects in the universe; there is no real world beyond them. Hume wrote (I think) that Berkeley's arguments don't admit of the slightest refutation, and they don't inspire the slightest conviction. On Earth, that may be true. On Tlön, it's false – the people there are "congenital idealists." Their language, philosophy, literature, and religion presuppose idealism. It's their common sense. And their philosophy starts to encroach on their reality. But what happens when we read and hear about Tlön – can their idealism invade our "real" world? Will we start to lose our metaphysical bearings? David and Tamler talk about Borges's invasive, unsettling story "Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius." Please listen so we can exist!

    (And speaking of things that may or may not exist, we also discuss the metaphysics of holes.)

    This episode is brought to you by GiveWell and the generous support of our listeners.

    Sponsored By:

    • GiveWell

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Is a hole a real thing, or just a place where something isn't? | Aeon Ideas
    • The Simpsons - Nature's Biggest Holes - YouTube
    • Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius - Wikipedia
    • Neoplatonism and Gnosticism - Wikipedia

    Episode 153: Progress in Psychology: A Reply to BootyBootyFartFart Dec 04, 2018
    Show notes

    David dies for science's sins and addresses the failed replication of one of his studies (conducted with three former VBW guests) by the Many Labs Project. But first, the guys try to gauge their intuitions about the phenomenal experience of their molecule-for-molecule mirror reflection duplicate in a universe with a non-orientable topology. Could this spell doom for e-categoricalism? Plus, the annual Thanksgiving tradition: IDW star and Factual Feminist Christina Hoff Sommers and Tamler argue over drinks about standpoint epistemology, political correctness, and lingerie.

    This episode is brought to you by Audible, Givewell, and the generosity of our supporters.

    Special Guest: Christina Hoff Sommers.

    Sponsored By:

    • Audible Promo Code: VERYBADWIZARDS
    • GiveWell

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • 2018 Sanders Philosophy of Mind Prize Winner - Daily Nous — Experiencing Left and Right in a Non-Orientable World
    • Experiencing Left and Right in a Non-Orientable World by Jonathan Simon
    • Very Bad Wizards is on Reddit — Join in on all the repugnant discussions on our Reddit community.
    • Large scale replication project finds that one of Dave's and colleagues' most cited findings (association between disgust sensitivity and homophobia) is not real. : VeryBadWizards
    • OSF | Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting

    Episode 152: Ruthlessness, Public and Private Nov 20, 2018
    Show notes

    Tamler and David continue their Nagel-gazing by discussing another essay from Mortal Questions: "Ruthlessness in Public Life." Why do we treat the immorality of politicians, military leaders, and others in power differently than the immorality of individuals? Why does it seem less aversive to shake the hand of someone responsible for the death of thousands of civilians through military action than it does to shake the hand of a serial killer who has merely killed dozens? Are the rules we use to judge the moral atrocities of public officials different from the ones we use to judge private atrocities? Do they have the same basic foundations? Plus, we satisfy our listeners bloodlust by arguing about the new "Journal of Controversial Ideas" (because it would be cowardly not to).

    This episode is brought to you by Givewell.org, and by the private morality of our generous supporters.

    Sponsored By:

    • GiveWell

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Here Comes 'The Journal of Controversial Ideas.' Cue the Outcry. - The Chronicle of Higher Education
    • Nagel, T. (2012). Mortal questions. Cambridge University Press. [Amazon affiliate link]

    Episode 151: Viddy Well, My Listeners (Stanley Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange") Nov 06, 2018
    Show notes

    There was me, that is Tamler, and my droog, that is David, and we sat in our living rooms on Skype trying to make up our rassoodocks what Stanley Kubrick's a Clockwork Orange was really about? Free will? We didn't think so. Punishment? Yeah but what about punishment? And what about the old ultraviolence - can it still shock us in the modern age? Then suddenly we viddied that thinking was for the gloopy ones and that the oomny just, like, press record and start the podcast. Slooshy well, my brothers, slooshy well.

    This episode is brought to you by our beloved Patreon supporters and www.givewell.org.

    Sponsored By:

    • GiveWell

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • A Clockwork Orange (film) - Wikipedia
    • COTO - Re-interpreting Alex's Violence in A Clockwork Orange
    • A Clockwork Orange | Film Review | Slant Magazine

    Episode 150: Paul Bloom Insisted That We Talk About Sex Robots Oct 23, 2018
    Show notes

    What better way to celebrate our 150th episode than to bring back our favorite guest – Paul Bloom! We riff on a series of topics: the new "grievance studies" hoax, sex robot brothels, perverse desires, and perverse beliefs. Then we get a little navel gazey (OK maybe more than a little) and talk about podcasting as a form of media and discussion, good teaching, and what we've learned about our listeners and ourselves. (Note: the audio may sound a little echoey towards the end because of how far we've crawled up our own asses.) This was a fun one, enjoy!

    Special Guest: Paul Bloom.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Proposed 'sex robot brothel' blocked by Houston city council
    • 'Sokal Squared': Is Huge Publishing Hoax 'Hilarious and Delightful' or an Ugly Example of Dishonesty and Bad Faith? - The Chronicle of Higher Education
    • The Jem'Hadar - Wikipedia

    Episode 149: Death, Immortality, and Porn (Intuition) Pumps Oct 02, 2018
    Show notes

    Is living forever a good thing? Could we maintain our values and personal attachments throughout eternity? Would we be motivated to accomplish anything? Can we make sense of a human life that doesn't have a fixed endpoint? We try to alleviate David's paralyzing fear of death by examining two articles - one on how immortality is worse than we think, and the other providing evidence that dying might be better than we think. Plus,we examine some famous thought experiments - if they were porn. And a special bonus: after the outro music, Eliza Sommers joins her Dad at to give her theory about Twin Peaks: The Return (contains spoilers).

    Special Guest: Eliza Sommers.

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • Intuition pump - Wikipedia
    • Very Bad Wizards Episode 52: Thought Experiments (Huh!) What Are They Good For? (Part 2)
    • Frankfurt cases - Wikipedia
    • Gettier problem - Wikipedia
    • Russell's paradox - Wikipedia
    • Veil of ignorance - Wikipedia
    • Buridan's ass - Wikipedia
    • There's a big problem with immortality: it goes on and on | Aeon Essays
    • Goranson, A., Ritter, R. S., Waytz, A., Norton, M. I., & Gray, K. (2017). Dying Is Unexpectedly Positive. Psychological Science, 28(7), 988-999.
    • Williams, B. (1973). The Makropulos case: reflections on the tedium of immortality (pp. pp-82).

    Episode 148: Am I Wrong? Sep 19, 2018
    Show notes

    Tamler wades into a Twitter controversy about Serena Williams - could this be his fast-track pass into the IDW? And since we're talking about that, why not throw in a discussion of Louis CK's surprise set at the Comedy Cellar? In the second segment, we step outside of last week's social media culture wars to discuss "But I Could Be Wrong," a paper by philosopher George Sher from Rice University. What happens once we realize that our moral convictions are often not better justified than the convictions of people who disagree with us? Does that mean it's no longer rational to act on them? And is the problem deeper for moral beliefs than it is for empirical or aesthetic beliefs?

    Support Very Bad Wizards

    Links:

    • US Open 2018: Serena Williams' fight with umpire Carlos Ramos, explained - Vox
    • Tamler tweets
    • Sher, G. (2001). But I could be wrong. Social Philosophy and Policy, 18(2), 64-78.
    • A Crying Shame: The 2018 US Open Will Only be Remembered for Serena by Cindy Shmerler (tennis.com)
    • Martina Navratilova: What Serena Got Wrong (NY Times)

    Previous 1 19 20 21 22 23 36 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Rationally Speaking Podcast

    1

    Rationally Speaking Podcast Natural Science
    Another Round

    2

    Another Round Arts
    Stuff Mom Never Told You

    3

    Stuff Mom Never Told You Philosophy
    In The Rabbit Hole

    4

    In The Rabbit Hole Philosophy
    The Gray Area with Sean Illing

    5

    The Gray Area with Sean Illing Education
    The Art of Manliness

    6

    The Art of Manliness Education
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights