True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Latest Episodes:

Why Charlie Adelson's Extortion Story Fell Apart in Three Hours Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

"Do extortionists send a girlfriend of the victim to get the money?" That's what prosecutor Georgia Cappleman asked after Charlie Adelson told a jury he'd been shaken down by hitmen. His defense: a layaway plan — three thousand a month through the family dental office, in checks his mother signed, with cash she allegedly washed before handing it off. A periodontist with more than eight million in family accounts, paying for alleged extortion like it was a dental plan.The jury took three hours. Guilty on all counts — murder, conspiracy, solicitation. Charlie mouthed the word "No" and dropped his head to the defense table. Judge Everett sentenced him to life without parole plus sixty consecutive years. His appeal was affirmed in July 2026 after his own attorney filed the venue challenge orally instead of in writing.This is the second of four parts covering the full Adelson murder-for-hire conspiracy. From Katherine Magbanua flipping after her life sentence to the enhanced Dolce Vita tape catching Charlie in his own words — this is the story of a man who thought he was smarter than everyone in the room and found out he wasn't.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

#CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #MurderForHire #AdelsonTrial #TrueCrime #DolceVita #ExtortionDefense #Tallahassee #FSU

Patrick Clancy’s Forgiveness Sparked What Reaction? Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

Days after losing his three children, Patrick Clancy publicly asked people to forgive Lindsay as he had.

That should have been his decision to make.

Instead, Patrick’s response to the tragedy became something strangers felt entitled to litigate for themselves.

He has since moved to New York, divorced Lindsay and remarried. His choices have generated intense online scrutiny and unsupported theories despite no public evidence tying him to the deaths.

Tony Brueski asks whether Patrick’s forgiveness broke the script some viewers had already written for him.

They wanted anger. They wanted demands for punishment. They wanted the grieving husband sitting visibly in court.

Patrick gave them something much harder to process: compassion, distance and an attempt to survive.

When people claim to be defending a family by attacking its surviving father, maybe the story is no longer really about the family.

END LINKS

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyCase #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Grief #OnlineConspiracies #TrueCrimeEthics #MassachusettsTrial #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski

Lindsay Clancy’s Jury Foreperson Reported What Problem? Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

The most consequential development in Lindsay Clancy’s deliberations may have nothing to do with another piece of evidence.

Kevin Reddington says the foreperson reported a problem with one juror and Judge William Sullivan’s reasonable-doubt instructions. The defense wanted the juror removed. Sullivan refused to choose between the apparent minority and majority positions.

That is exactly where this gets uncomfortable.

A unanimous jury only works if jurors can disagree without being punished for disagreeing. But jurors also swear to follow the law. If eleven people believe number twelve has crossed that line, who determines whether they’re right?

Tony Brueski examines the alleged holdout, the Tuey-Rodriguez “dynamite” instruction and whether a case built around competing psychiatric opinions was almost designed to expose the weaknesses of unanimous jury decision-making.

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeadlock #HoldoutJuror #CriminalResponsibility #PostpartumPsychosis #MassachusettsTrial #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski

Lindsay Clancy's Judge Declares Mistrial. Why? Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

Andrea Yates was the name people used before Lindsay Clancy. Now Clancy is the name people use instead of learning anything. A hung jury just made that shorthand a lot more complicated. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, was on trial for allegedly killing her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023, reportedly using exercise resistance bands. She's charged with three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation and pleaded not guilty. Her defense, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, centered on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication, arguing a medical system documented her crisis and failed to intervene before it was too late. Clancy reportedly attempted suicide after the killings and has been paralyzed from the waist down since. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. Nine women and three men sat through five weeks, eighty-plus witnesses, and three hundred exhibits — then told the judge three separate times they couldn't reach a verdict. Reddington's attempt to remove a holdout juror got rejected all the way up to the state's highest court. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after thirty-nine-plus hours of deadlock. Plymouth County's DA is deciding whether to retry, with a status hearing already on the books. But the bigger question doesn't belong to a courtroom. Two-thirds of mothers who kill their children had a documented psychiatric history. More than twenty countries treat postpartum psychiatric crisis differently under the law than premeditated murder. America still doesn't. We're asking what "another Lindsay Clancy" really means — and who it lets everyone else off the hook for.
Links
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Legal Disclaimer
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Hashtags
#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Mistrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PlymouthCounty #AndreaYates #AnotherLindsayClancy

Lindsay Clancy's Jury Filmed By Woman Hiding WHAT? Sep 07, 2026

Show notes

Somebody treated the Lindsay Clancy murder trial like a celebrity sighting — and it happened at the worst possible moment, while the jury was already telling the judge they couldn't agree.
A 56-year-old woman was arrested outside Plymouth Superior Court, accused of secretly filming jurors as they left the building during deliberations. She claimed she'd come to see Lindsay. Police found deleted video of the panel on her phone regardless. Judge Sullivan had to pull every juror aside individually to make sure deliberations could keep going — all while the panel was already deep in a deadlock nobody expected to break easily.
This jury heard eighty witnesses across five weeks and worked through more than three hundred exhibits. Prosecution psychiatrists testified Lindsay Clancy wasn't psychotic when her three children died. Defense psychiatrists said she was. The defense isn't contesting the physical evidence — the exercise bands, the DNA, none of it — only whether she was criminally responsible, a question Massachusetts law puts squarely on the prosecution to disprove.
When the jury said they were stuck, Sullivan gave them the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction, effectively telling them this is as good as the evidence gets. They went back anyway. They're still stuck.
If it ends in a hung jury, nothing is settled. Lindsay Clancy remains charged with three counts of first-degree murder, still held at Tewksbury State Hospital, still paralyzed from the waist down, while Plymouth County DA Timothy Cruz decides whether to do this whole trial again.
Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Tony to break down the deadlock, the courthouse spectator who may have handed both sides a mistrial argument, and what happens to a case this fractured next.
Links & Footer
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Hashtags
#LindsayClancy #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #HungJury #JuryTampering #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #MurderTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

What The Nolan Wells Phone Could Still Prove Sep 07, 2026

Show notes

One piece of evidence could answer almost every open question in the Nolan Wells case, and nobody has touched it in six weeks. His phone has been with his family since July 5. On July 15, they agreed with the Jackson County DA on a joint forensic exam at a community college lab, with their own experts, the DA's experts, and possibly the FBI. No date was ever locked in. In early August, the friends' attorney went on national radio and accused the family of stonewalling. The DA's office fired back with a 44-hour deadline to hand the phone to her office instead — while Nolan's parents were out of state. The family called that bad faith and offered any day between August 18 and 21. Still no exam. While the phone sat waiting, Al Sharpton wasn't. Four days after Nolan's body was found on Horn Island, he called the case suspicious and framed it around race — before the sheriff had ruled anything out, before an independent autopsy found no fractures, no lacerations, no deep-tissue injuries. He asked on camera if the friends were racist. He announced a six-figure reward at the funeral before cause of death was even determined. His attorneys now say he never accused anyone of a crime. His own timeline, statement by statement, tells a different story. Three strangers from three states are facing federal charges for threatening the friends over claims that still haven't been proven or disproven. The phone sitting in Ocean Springs could settle it. Nobody's opened it yet.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Hashtags
#NolanWells #AlSharpton #BenCrump #HornIsland #Mississippi #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #Investigation #JusticeForNolan

What JP Miller Confiscated Every Time Mica Called Sep 07, 2026

Show notes

Mica Miller called police at least seven times, reporting harassment, tire slashing, and surveillance, telling officers she feared for her life. Every time, her husband John-Paul Miller had a story ready — telling officers she was bipolar, schizophrenic, having an episode — then filed a mental health pick-up order and took her phone, laptop, purse, and car, claiming he was stopping her from overspending. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott calls it pathologizing the victim: terrorize a woman privately, then use her own trauma response to make her look unstable to the people she's begging for help. Federal prosecutors allege JP tracked her car, contacted her more than fifty times in a single day, and posted an intimate photo of her online without consent. Two 911 calls Mica made in February 2024, later published by FITSNews, reveal even more — one reporting that JP's adult son Logan Ryan Hardee made an unwanted advance toward her in her own kitchen, the other reporting him following her around town armed and living in the house she'd fled. Logan already faced a felony domestic violence charge tied to a different woman's hospitalization. Two 2025 civil lawsuits allege JP and his 77-year-old father used their churches and a school to gain access to underage girls across two decades; JP denies it and countersued, while his father never answered and lost by default. JP's federal cyberstalking trial is set for October 2026.

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

Hashtags
#MicaMiller #JPMiller #ShavaunScott #DeathOfThePastorsWife #LoganHardee #SolidRockChurch #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Netflix #CoerciveControl

Clancy's Lawyer Reddington Called Prosecutors WHAT?! Sep 07, 2026

Show notes

A Plymouth County jury is deciding whether Lindsay Clancy is criminally responsible for killing her three children, and the case hinges on two competing timelines that both last less than twenty minutes. Prosecutors say Clancy sent her husband Patrick out for Thai food, then used that window to take Cora, Dawson, and Callan to the basement and kill them one at a time with exercise bands. ADA Jennifer Sprague told the jury that afterward, Clancy missed a phone call, called the person back, held a normal conversation, and hung up — behavior, prosecutors argue, a woman controlled entirely by a hallucination shouldn't be capable of. The defense says the hallucination had already finished by then. Clancy described a male voice, never heard before or since, that arrived on the afternoon of January 24, 2023, and told her this was her last chance to kill her children and herself. It lasted roughly eighteen minutes and stopped the instant the children were dead. Defense psychiatrists Paul Zeizel and Phillip Resnick both diagnosed postpartum psychosis and testified Clancy had no understanding that what she was doing was wrong. Resnick evaluated Andrea Yates under nearly identical circumstances years earlier. The prosecution's forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff disagreed sharply, telling jurors a command hallucination vanishing the second its command is carried out doesn't match how psychosis actually behaves. Defense attorney Reddington's closing shifted the blame toward thirteen psychiatric medications and providers who never coordinated Clancy's care. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta covered the trial from inside the courtroom. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer has spent her career reading exactly this kind of behavioral evidence. Tony Brueski gets both of their takes as the jury weighs a case where the experts, and the hosts, don't see it the same way.

Links & Disclaimer
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

Hashtags
#LindsayClancy #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMurders #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #CommandHallucination

Lindsay Clancy's Handwriting Became WHAT Before The Killings? Sep 07, 2026

Show notes

A month before the killings, Lindsay Clancy's handwriting stopped looking like handwriting. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington showed the jury her journal entries from December 2022 and called them chicken scratches — proof, he argued, that her mind was already unraveling before anyone outside her house noticed. Reddington built his case around a chart too: lorazepam, sertraline, hydroxyzine, buspirone, trazodone, prescription after prescription piled onto a new mother by providers who never once compared notes. The defense's final witness, forensic psychiatrist Phillip Resnick — who evaluated Andrea Yates in her own case decades ago — told this Plymouth County jury Lindsay Clancy was clearly psychotic when she killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. The prosecution's own experts complicated their case. Forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun told jurors this was a serious suicide attempt accompanied by killing her children out of love, because Clancy couldn't bear to leave them behind. Forensic psychiatrist Gregory Saathoff, under defense questioning, agreed the prosecution's opening statement had minimized what Clancy was actually experiencing — and flagged what he called significant inconsistencies in how she described the voice that told her to kill them. ADA Jennifer Sprague's closing argued something colder: that Clancy made a rational choice, that her children were the only thing keeping her from her own death, and that she left them in the basement and went upstairs to finish what she'd started. The jury spent three and a half hours deliberating on their first day and went home without a verdict. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta sit down with Tony Brueski to pick apart a prosecution case that may have undercut itself.

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

Hashtags
#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #LindsayClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #VerdictWatch #ClosingArguments

Keffe D Claims THIS About His Diddy Story Sep 06, 2026

Show notes

A Las Vegas jury convicted Duane “Keffe D” Davis of first-degree murder in Tupac Shakur's killing in about three hours — built entirely on Davis's own words. A 2008 federal proffer. A 2009 police interview. A 2017 documentary. A 2019 memoir he called the real truth. No weapon. No Cadillac. No phone records. No surveillance. Just a man who couldn't stop talking, for eighteen straight years, until a jury decided that talking was enough to convict him. His defense tried the opposite play: almost two hours in closing arguments insisting every one of those statements — to cops, to cameras, to his own publisher — was a lie. It didn't work. Davis is facing life in prison, has told the judge he'll appeal, and asked for his phone and laptop back before he goes. Here's where it gets bigger than one man's sentence. Davis is the same source who's named Sean “Diddy” Combs in this murder since 2008, alleging a million-dollar payoff routed through a Harlem contact who is no longer alive to confirm or deny it. Combs has denied any involvement. Police have repeatedly said he's never been named a suspect. Every other person in a position to independently back up Davis's account is dead. So the case against Combs was always going to rest on whether Davis is believable. A jury just said yes, enough to send him to prison for life. His own lawyers spent two hours in the same courtroom saying no, not even close. That's not a contradiction true crime fans should let slide — and it's the exact question we're digging into.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

Hashtags
#TupacShakur #KeffeD #SeanCombs #Diddy #TupacMurderTrial #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #GuiltyVerdict #LasVegas #ColdCase

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected