True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Latest Episodes:

Did Lindsay Clancy’s Mistrial Just Open Three New Battles? Sep 10, 2026

Show notes

The jury split eleven to one. The trial ended in a mistrial. And instead of closure, the Lindsay Clancy case broke into three simultaneous legal fights.

The first: DA Timothy Cruz deciding whether to retry a case where eleven jurors reportedly sided with the defense. Judge Sullivan scheduled a September 29 status conference and indicated he wants to retry in the fall.

The second: Two civil lawsuits — one from Patrick Clancy, one from Lindsay — against the same medical providers. The complaints allege nine psychiatric medications, eight in a three-week window, telehealth-only care from a psychiatrist who never met her patient, and no coordinated treatment plan. With the criminal case stalled, the civil track is the only active proceeding examining the medical timeline.

The third: The legal maneuvering for a potential second trial. Reddington wants the next jury sequestered. A 56-year-old woman was arrested for filming jurors during deliberations. The prosecution characterized Clancy’s injuries as insincere and may have lost eleven jurors doing it.

Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action.

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines all three battles in one extended conversation — what the deadlock signals, what the lawsuits allege, and whether the prosecution can survive a second trial after an eleven-to-one rejection.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #MedicalMalpractice #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Lindsay Clancy: Reddington Was Ready to Start Over—If This Failed Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Lindsay Clancy’s first jury left without a verdict. Her lawyer was ready to return to court within days.

Kevin Reddington asked for an expedited chance to argue that the prosecution hadn’t proved enough to convict. He also proposed moving quickly into another trial if the judge refused. Neither request guaranteed that timetable.

Tony Brueski follows the decisions that could bring a new jury into this case, along with the consequences for Patrick Clancy and a family still living with the loss.

Would another trial get prosecutors a different result—and what would it cost the people asked to relive it?

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Substack: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X: https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TonyBrueski #KevinReddington #PatrickClancy #HungJury #Mistrial #Massachusetts #ClancyUpdate #TrueCrimeCommunity

Did Lindsay Clancy’s Prosecutors Cost Themselves the Verdict? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

The prosecution in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial made a strategic choice: argue that her fall from a second-story window was not a genuine attempt on her life and that her injuries were superficial. Clancy sat in a wheelchair, paralyzed from the waist down, while the jury heard it.

Eleven of twelve jurors reportedly sided with the defense. The trial ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberation at Plymouth Superior Court. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington blamed the prosecution’s tactics and said the jury had been “robbed” by the lone holdout.

Reddington’s legal maneuvers in the trial’s final hours were aggressive. He asked Judge Sullivan to dismiss the holdout juror. Sullivan refused. He asked for a lesser-charge poll. Sullivan refused. He filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The court denied it.

Separately, a 56-year-old woman named Dawn Light was arrested during deliberations for allegedly filming jurors in a courthouse parking lot. She was charged with aggravated intimidation. Reddington has said he will demand the next jury be sequestered.

DA Timothy Cruz defended his prosecution and said he would decide on a retrial shortly. The case relied on the McHoul standard, which asks jurors to assess whether a defendant had substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness.

Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines whether the prosecution’s framing of Clancy’s injuries alienated the jury, what the emergency petition reveals about the defense’s confidence, and whether the insanity standard itself is the problem.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #KevinReddington #DATimothyCruz #Retrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Donna Adelson Told a Judge She Never Had WHAT After Her Conviction? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Donna Adelson signed 44 checks to a woman who never worked at her dental practice. She allegedly scheduled her daughter's Geek Squad alibi for the morning of the murder. She called her son Charlie three times instead of calling the police when the FBI bumped her with the killers' names. And when her son was convicted of murder, she showed up at Miami International Airport with a one-way ticket to Vietnam.In jail, two informants testified Donna confessed. One said Donna told her: "She did it. It was to keep her grandkids. But it wasn't supposed to go that far." The other said Donna wrote a question-and-answer script in her own handwriting — a rehearsed story for another inmate to perform under oath — and offered ten thousand dollars and a grand piano as payment. A state handwriting expert confirmed the writing was Donna's.The jury deliberated for three hours. At sentencing, the woman who prosecutors say orchestrated a murder through her family's dental office stood in shackles and a purple jumpsuit and told the judge she'd never had a parking ticket. Judge Everett cited her utter lack of remorse. This is the third installment of the four-part Adelson series.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #MurderForHire #AdelsonFamily #TrueCrime #Vietnam #ParkingTicket #Tallahassee #Convicted

Did Lindsay Clancy’s Providers Create the Crisis? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Nine psychiatric medications. Eight prescribed in a three-week span. Telehealth-only appointments with a psychiatrist who never met her patient in person. No coordinated care plan. And a healthcare system that, according to two separate civil lawsuits, failed to diagnose a mother spiraling into postpartum psychosis.

Patrick Clancy filed a wrongful death suit in January 2026. Lindsay Clancy filed a medical malpractice complaint two days later. Both name the same providers — Dr. Jennifer Tufts, nurse practitioners Rebecca Jollotta and Julie Paul, therapist Lateisha Dukes, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health.

The criminal trial at Plymouth Superior Court produced five weeks of testimony and ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked eleven to one. Clancy had pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months. Prosecutors alleged deliberate action. The defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication.

The prosecution’s psychiatric experts and the defense’s psychiatric experts gave the jury contradictory assessments of Clancy’s mental state. The jury could not resolve the disagreement.

With the criminal case suspended, the civil lawsuits are now the only proceedings actively examining the treatment decisions that preceded the killings. Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines what the providers face, whether the mistrial changes their exposure, and why the medical accountability fight may outlast the criminal one.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #MedicalMalpractice #PostpartumPsychosis #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Did Lindsay Clancy’s Lone Holdout Change Everything? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Eleven jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial reportedly wanted to acquit. One refused. After seven days and more than thirty-six hours of deliberation, Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial at Plymouth Superior Court.

The jury of nine women and three men faced one question: was Clancy criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — at the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023. Clancy admitted to killing them. Her defense argued postpartum psychosis and overmedication stripped her ability to understand what she was doing. Prosecutors said she was rational and deliberate.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington characterized the split as eleven to one for acquittal and went public immediately. He called the holdout biased, thanked the jurors “minus one,” and said the jury was “robbed.” He then filed an emergency petition with the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to intervene. The court denied it within the hour.

When the formal mistrial was read, female jurors broke down in the courtroom. One put her face in her hands. Another clenched her fists. A third would not open her eyes.

DA Timothy Cruz defended his prosecution and said he would decide shortly on a retrial. Sullivan scheduled a status conference for September 29 and said he wanted to retry the case in the fall.

Criminal defense trial attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries examines whether one holdout truly changes the trajectory of this case and what leverage the eleven-to-one split gives Reddington in retrial negotiations. He also asks why the families on both sides may be the ones who decide whether this happens again.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #BobMotta #Mistrial #HungJury #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimeToday

Barry Morphew Made What Offer Before He Left? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Barry Morphew’s Denver traffic encounter is now part of the legal fight over the conditions keeping him out of jail while he awaits trial in Suzanne Morphew’s death.

Court records say another driver accused Morphew of aggressive driving before two vehicles were struck. Judge Amanda Hopkins later reviewed video and wrote that the person visible in it is clearly Morphew.

According to Hopkins, he refused to give his name or identification and indicated he didn’t have insurance. He then allegedly offered the other driver a specific amount of money for the damage.

She refused and said police were being called. The judge says Morphew left, nearly struck another person, and drove over a curb.

Hopkins restricted him to his home. Prosecutors want no driving and tighter monitoring, arguing that the encounter gives the court new reasons to examine flight risk.

The cash offer is the detail that makes this episode impossible to ignore.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrimeToday #BarryMorphewTrial #SuzanneMorphewCase #ColoradoTrueCrime #MorphewCase #TrueCrimePodcast #ColoradoCourts #CrimeNews

The Lindsay Clancy Case Became a Trial of What Else? Sep 09, 2026

Show notes

Lindsay Clancy is the defendant, but the public has spent this trial judging nearly everyone around her.

The jury is being dissected after days of deadlock and an allegation that one member is not properly applying reasonable doubt. Patrick Clancy has been attacked online for forgiving Lindsay and rebuilding his life despite no evidence implicating him. Prosecutors are facing questions about why the case went to trial after Kevin Reddington said no plea offer was ever made.

Tony Brueski connects those controversies to the central issue jurors must decide: whether Lindsay was criminally responsible.

Psychiatrists disagreed. The jury disagreed. The public certainly disagrees.

Maybe that is the real story.

A legal system designed to produce binary answers has collided with a tragedy in which almost every important human question exists somewhere in the gray.

END LINKS

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter: https://x.com/tonybpod
Check out Robin Dreeke’s Master Class http://masterclass.com/robindreeke

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #PatrickClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #JuryDeadlock #PostpartumPsychosis #CriminalResponsibility #JusticeSystem #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski

Tyler Robinson Pleaded Not Guilty After WHAT Message? Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

Tyler Robinson pleaded not guilty in the Charlie Kirk case after a Utah judge found probable cause for aggravated murder and six other charges. Prosecutors say a private message exchange, surveillance footage, DNA testing and a rifle recovered near the alleged escape route support their case. Robinson remains presumed innocent.

The defense is testing the state’s evidence without committing publicly to one final theory. Its lawyers have challenged identification and forensic interpretation and argue that one shot directed at Kirk does not establish the danger to others required for the capital aggravator.

Utah law allows Robinson to maintain a not-guilty plea, force prosecutors to prove every element and later change that plea before conviction. No agreement has been announced. One alleged message remains the detail that makes the plea difficult to square with the prosecution’s account.

#CharlieKirkCase #TylerRobinson #TrueCrimeToday #CharlieKirk #NotGuiltyPlea #AggravatedMurder #DeathPenaltyCase #UtahCourt #TrueCrimeNews #LegalAnalysis

Lindsay Clancy Faced Trial Without What Prosecutor Offer? Sep 08, 2026

Show notes

Kevin Reddington says Plymouth County prosecutors never offered Lindsay Clancy a plea deal.

With first-degree murder charges remaining in place, Massachusetts law required a jury trial. Now that jury has struggled for days with the exact question everyone knew would define the case: criminal responsibility.

The defense says Clancy experienced postpartum psychosis and lacked the substantial capacity required by law. Prosecutors argue that despite her mental illness, she understood the wrongfulness of her conduct and could control it.

Tony Brueski asks whether a system offering such radically different destinations—life without parole or psychiatric confinement—is actually measuring culpability with the precision this case requires.

And if the central goal is protecting society, what specifically does incarceration accomplish that secure psychiatric treatment would not?

That is not an argument for either verdict. It is a question about what punishment is supposed to do.

END LINKS

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyCase #LindsayClancyTrial #PleaDeal #CriminalResponsibility #PostpartumPsychosis #JusticeSystem #MassachusettsLaw #CourtroomAnalysis #TonyBrueski

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected