TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    News

    The Re-Trial Of Alex Murdaugh

    The South Carolina Supreme Court threw out Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions. Unanimously. Now the most-watched criminal case in state history starts over — new judge, new jury, new rules — and this is where you follow every step of it.

    From Hidden Killers host Tony Brueski, The Re-Trial of Alex Murdaugh delivers real-time legal analysis, courtroom coverage, and expert interviews as the State decides whether and how to retry the disbarred attorney for the June 2021 killings of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. The Supreme Court didn’t just reverse the verdict — it rewrote the playbook. The financial crimes evidence that dominated the first trial has been sharply restricted. The jury tampering by former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill, who pled guilty to perjury, has been laid bare in a devastating 27-page opinion. Everything about this case is different now.

    This podcast covers what matters: pretrial motions, venue fights, evidentiary rulings, witness strategy, jury selection, and the legal collisions that will determine whether Murdaugh is convicted again or walks on the murder charges. No filler. No recycled takes. No speculation dressed up as analysis. Just the case, the law, and what it means — explained by someone who has covered every turn of this story from the beginning.

    New episodes drop as developments warrant. Subscribe so you don’t miss the moment this case breaks open again.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © True Crime Today

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    New Defense Strategy For Alex Murdaugh, Attorney Eric Faddis Weighs In- WEEK IN REVIEW Jan 22, 2024
    Show notes Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.
    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Will Becky Hill Testify At Alex Murdaugh New Trial Hearing? - WEEK IN REVIEW Jan 22, 2024
    Show notes Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.
    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Alex Murdaugh Status Hearing For New Trial Part 1- WEEK IN REVIEW Jan 20, 2024
    Show notes Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.
    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.
    Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.
    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Attorney Eric Faddis On Likelihood Of Alex Murdaugh Getting New Trial Jan 18, 2024
    Show notes As the saga of Alex Murdaugh's potential second murder trial unfolds, a new twist emerges with the involvement of Colleton County's clerk of court, Becky Hill. Her recent admission to plagiarism and allegations of misusing federal child support funds to pay office bonuses have cast a shadow over the case. But the question remains: Are these developments mere distractions, or could they significantly impact Murdaugh's quest for a new trial?
    Attorney Eric Faddis joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these latest revelations. Faddis pointed out that while these allegations against Hill are eyebrow-raising, the focus remains on the possibility of jury tampering in the Murdaugh case. "Did this guy get a fair trial?" Faddis pondered, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.
    The credibility of Becky Hill is now under intense scrutiny, especially with sworn affidavits from at least one juror alleging her involvement in jury tampering. Faddis explained, "Becky Hill's credibility is on the line because she's saying, hey, this didn't happen." He suggested that these allegations of deceit might play a significant role in the upcoming hearing for a new trial for Alex Murdaugh.
    The legal intricacies of the case are further complicated by the fact that the judge is already aware of these allegations against Hill. Faddis noted, "Even if they don't come into the hearing, one has to think, is that playing in the judge's mind?" This raises questions about the influence of external factors on legal decisions.
    Murdaugh's defense argues that he doesn't need to show actual bias from any juror to obtain a new trial. Faddis clarified that while different jurisdictions have varying standards, Murdaugh would typically need to prove a credible allegation of jury tampering and substantial prejudice. "That's a huge burden," Faddis stated, highlighting the challenge Murdaugh's team faces in proving that the alleged tampering impacted the trial's outcome.
    The difficulty lies in proving the influence of jury tampering on individual jurors' decisions. Faddis mused, "If even one juror would have disagreed, that could have resulted in a mistrial." This possibility underscores the significance of even a single juror's influence in such a high-stakes trial.
    As the legal drama continues to unfold, the question lingers: Will the allegations against Becky Hill and the shadow of jury tampering pave the way for Alex Murdaugh to receive a new trial? And if so, what implications will this have for the justice system and those closely involved in this convoluted case?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Alex Murdaugh's New Trial Arguments, Ret FBI Coffindaffer Weighs In Jan 18, 2024
    Show notes As the Alec Murdoch trial edges closer to an evidentiary hearing, a pivotal question arises: How does one navigate the murky waters of legal arguments where both sides claim absolute righteousness? This question forms the core of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discuss the impending trial and the complex arguments surrounding it.
    The Murdoch case, set for a crucial hearing at the end of January, presents a legal battlefield where each side vehemently asserts its correctness. Coffindaffer, with her expertise, sheds light on the nuances of these arguments. "The arguments by his side are made very well. They're made very strong," she acknowledges, pointing out the formidable nature of Murdoch's defense.
    Central to the debate is the concept of jury bias and its influence on the trial's outcome. Murdoch's defense posits that the mere expression of bias by a juror, irrespective of its impact on decision-making, warrants a new trial. This stance is countered by the prosecution, which insists that such bias must demonstrably affect the jury's decision to be considered significant. This leads to the challenging task of proving the impact of subconscious influences on a juror's decision-making process.
    Coffindaffer highlights the potential for an in-camera hearing with the judge, who holds the discretion to evaluate both sides of the argument. The jurors' testimonies could be crucial in determining the extent of any alleged bias. "What do those jurors say? Did they say I didn't think anything about it?" she questions, emphasizing the importance of their input.
    The episode also delves into the broader implications of the case, including other allegations against key figures like Becky Hill. Coffindaffer raises the question of how these allegations might influence the judge's decision-making process and whether they should factor into the evaluation of the jury tampering issue.
    As the episode concludes, it leaves listeners pondering a critical question: In the intricate dance of legal proceedings, where does the line between technicality and truth lie? The Alec Murdoch trial, as dissected in "Hidden Killers," serves as a stark reminder of the intricate and often murky nature of the justice system, leaving us to wonder about the delicate balance between law, evidence, and moral judgment.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Murdaugh Murders: The Credibility Continues To Crumble for Becky Hill Jan 18, 2024
    Show notes The ongoing saga surrounding Alex Murdaugh's trial has taken another dramatic turn with the spotlight now on Becky Hill, the clerk of court. Accusations of jury tampering and improper use of office funds have raised serious questions about her conduct and its potential impact on the trial's outcome. Psychologist John Delatorre joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect these developments and their implications.
    The conversation begins with a critical question: "Has Becky Hill's behavior jeopardized the integrity of the Alex Murdaugh trial?" This question sets the stage for an in-depth analysis of Hill's actions and their potential consequences.
    Brueski outlines the accusations against Hill, including the misuse of federal child support funds for personal bonuses and possible jury tampering. Delatorre weighs in, expressing skepticism about the likelihood of Murdaugh's conviction being overturned. "It's really hard to get a verdict vacated and remanded back to court," he notes, highlighting the challenges of proving jury tampering.
    The discussion shifts to Hill's motivations, particularly her decision to write a book about the case. Delatorre questions the wisdom of this move, given the scrutiny it has brought upon her actions. "All of this stuff is now being uncovered. What do you think is going to happen once you get the attention that you're so wanting?" he asks, pointing out the risks of seeking the spotlight.
    Brueski and Delatorre also explore the broader implications of Hill's actions on the legal system. They discuss the potential for a new trial if evidence of jury tampering is proven, but Delatorre remains doubtful. "Even if she did sink it, and it was vacated and remanded back to court for another trial, I still think that he's going to be found guilty," he asserts.
    The conversation takes a turn to the realm of popular culture, with Delatorre comparing the unfolding events to a spinoff series. "This is the Better Call Saul of the Breaking Bad that was the Murdaugh trial," he quips, highlighting the dramatic and unexpected twists in the case.
    As the episode concludes, Brueski and Delatorre leave the audience with a thought-provoking question: "In the complex web of legal and ethical issues surrounding the Alex Murdaugh trial, can justice prevail, or will the actions of key figures like Becky Hill cast a lasting shadow over the case's outcome?" This question encapsulates the uncertainty and intrigue surrounding a case that continues to captivate and confound observers.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    New Defense Strategy For Alex Murdaugh, Attorney Eric Faddis Weighs In Jan 17, 2024
    Show notes Could Alex Murdaugh, embroiled in a saga of deceit and death, navigate a different legal path in a potential retrial? This intriguing question set the stage for a riveting discussion on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, where host Tony Brueski and former Felony Prosecutor Eric Faddis delved into the complexities of the high-profile case.
    Faddis, analyzing the potential for a new defense strategy, noted, "They're going to have to pull out all the stops." He highlighted the challenge Murdaugh faces due to his previous testimony, which included damning admissions. "He's going to be married to those," Faddis said, suggesting that even if Murdaugh doesn't testify again, the jury is likely to hear about his unfavorable statements.
    The conversation then turned to the admissibility of evidence from the first trial in a potential retrial. Faddis explained that former testimony under oath is often admissible, especially if it pertains to the same matter. This means that Murdaugh's previous admissions, including those about defrauding his clients, could resurface, posing significant challenges for his defense.
    Brueski raised a critical question about Murdaugh's likelihood of testifying again. Faddis, hinting at Murdaugh's personality traits, opined, "He cannot help himself. He is absolutely going to get on that stand." He pointed out that Murdaugh's articulateness, coupled with potential narcissistic tendencies, might lead him to make the same mistake of self-incrimination.
    Regarding the timeline for a potential retrial, Faddis noted that while the wheels of justice turn slowly, much of the prosecution's investigation is already complete. "I suspect if there is a new trial... that trial could come to pass more quickly than we all think," he said, estimating a possible timeframe of six months after a decision on the retrial.
    As the discussion concluded, the gravity of the situation was not lost on the hosts. Murdaugh's case, marked by tragedy and betrayal, continues to captivate and confound observers. With a potential retrial on the horizon, the legal community and the public alike are left to ponder: Will Alex Murdaugh's next courtroom appearance reveal new truths, or will it be a repeat of past mistakes? And crucially, how will justice be served in this tangled web of crime and deception?
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Will Becky Hill Testify At Alex Murdaugh New Trial Hearing? Jan 17, 2024
    Show notes The Murky Waters of the Alec Murdoch Trial: A Legal Battle of Right vs. More Right
    In the labyrinth of legal battles, how often does the truth get tangled in a web of technicalities and interpretations? This question is at the heart of a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," where host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer discuss the upcoming evidentiary hearing in the Alec Murdoch trial. The episode delves into the complex arguments from both sides, each claiming the mantle of righteousness in a case that has captured public attention.
    The Murdoch trial, set for an evidentiary hearing at the end of January, presents a classic case of legal tug-of-war. Brueski opens the discussion, highlighting the opposing arguments, with each side firmly believing in their stance. Jennifer Coffindaffer, with her seasoned experience, weighs in on the intricacies of these arguments. "The arguments by his side are made very well. They're made very strong," she notes, acknowledging the compelling nature of Murdoch's defense.
    The crux of the debate lies in the interpretation of jury bias and its impact on the trial's outcome. Murdoch's defense argues that any bias expressed by a juror, regardless of its influence on the decision-making process, is grounds for a new trial. In contrast, the prosecution contends that such bias must have a tangible impact to be considered significant. This leads to the challenging question of how to prove the impact of subconscious influences on a juror's decision.
    Coffindaffer points out the possibility of an in-camera hearing with the judge, who holds the discretion to evaluate both sides. The jurors' testimonies could play a pivotal role in determining the extent of any alleged bias. "What do those jurors say? Did they say I didn't think anything about it?" she queries, underlining the importance of their perspective.
    The episode also touches upon the broader implications of the case, including other allegations against Becky Hill, a key figure in the trial. Coffindaffer raises the question of how these allegations might influence the judge's decision-making process and whether they should factor into the evaluation of the jury tampering issue.
    As the episode concludes, the question remains: In the complex dance of legal proceedings, where does the line between technicality and truth lie? The Alec Murdoch trial, as dissected in "Hidden Killers," serves as a stark reminder of the intricate and often murky nature of the justice system, leaving listeners to ponder the delicate balance between law, evidence, and moral judgment.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Murdaugh Murders: More Possible Criminal Allegations Made Against Becky Hill Jan 17, 2024
    Show notes In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, hosts Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke delve into the unfolding legal drama surrounding Alex Murdaugh, a figure entangled in a web of legal controversies. As Murdoch's second murder trial approaches, the hosts discuss the latest developments, including allegations against Becky Hill, a key figure in the case.
    Brueski opens the discussion with a pointed question: "As we get closer to Alex Murdaugh's second murder trial, are we witnessing a clear path being paved for his defense?" This question sets the stage for a deep dive into the complexities of the case, with Dreeke providing expert insights from his extensive experience in law enforcement.
    The hosts discuss the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division's (SLED) active investigations into Becky Hill, focusing on allegations of jury tampering and the misuse of office. The allegations include improper use of federal child support funds for personal bonuses, raising serious questions about Hill's credibility. "There is a lot of impropriety allegations that are floating here for someone who really needs credibility," Brueski notes, highlighting the potential impact on Murdoch's trial.
    Dreeke, drawing on his FBI background, reflects on the importance of adhering to rules, regulations, and procedures to prevent such situations. He expresses his non-surprise at the developments, given the number of problematic data points emerging in the case. "Every time something like this pops up, I'm reminded of all the rules, regulations, process, and procedures that are in place to keep things like this from happening," he says.
    A significant point of discussion is Hill's decision to self-publish a book related to the case. Dreeke contrasts this with his own experience of publishing books while in the FBI, emphasizing the rigorous pre-publication review process he underwent. "How was it that she was able to get that book out so fast?" Dreeke wonders, questioning the lack of oversight in Hill's publishing process.
    Brueski and Dreeke also touch on the financial aspects of self-publishing, debunking the notion that it leads to significant financial gain. They speculate on Hill's motivations and the potential consequences of her actions, both professionally and legally. "You're sitting at the end of the day saying you've blown your life on nothing," Brueski remarks, reflecting on the risks Hill took.
    The hosts conclude by pondering the broader implications of Hill's actions and the potential impact on Murdoch's upcoming trial. They question whether Hill's decisions were made in isolation or if they are indicative of a pattern of behavior that could have influenced other cases she was involved in.
    As the episode wraps up, Brueski and Dreeke leave the audience with a thought-provoking question: "Will the legal missteps and improprieties surrounding key figures in Alex Murdaugh's case influence the outcome of his second murder trial, or are they merely distractions from the central issues at hand?" This question encapsulates the uncertainty and complexity of a case that continues to captivate and confound observers.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Alex Murdaugh Status Hearing For New Trial Part 1 Jan 16, 2024
    Show notes Alex Murdaugh, convicted of murdering his wife and son, appeared in a pre-trial public status hearing on Tuesday. The judge discussed the upcoming hearing later this month, which will determine if Murdaugh should be granted a new trial.
    In October, Murdaugh's legal team filed for a new trial, arguing that the court clerk had unduly influenced the jury during his trial for the murder of his wife and younger son. At the pre-trial hearing, the defense presented reasons for an evidentiary hearing, while the state contended that such a motion should have been filed within 10 days of the verdict. They also claimed the defense was aware of the clerk's alleged misconduct before this deadline.
    Former South Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice Jean Toal, who replaced Judge Clifton Newman in the case, emphasized the need for factual evidence. Toal faces the decision of whether to repeat a six-week murder trial that involved over 70 witnesses and around 800 exhibits. She was appointed by the state's highest court to manage the significant decision of a retrial.
    Central to the defense's appeal are claims that Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill tampered with the jury, influencing their verdict for personal gain. Allegations include Hill questioning jurors about Murdaugh's guilt, discrediting his testimony, and accompanying jurors to post-trial media interviews in New York City. Hill has denied these accusations.
    Toal will also decide if jurors can testify privately for their protection. The defense is scheduled to present evidence in a three-day hearing starting January 29.
    Murdaugh is currently serving a life sentence without parole for the June 2021 murders, plus an additional 27 years for financial crimes, including stealing about $12 million.
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

    Previous 1 26 27 28 29 30 50 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights