TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Business

    The “Daily Call” From Option Alpha

    Join Kirk Du Plessis on The “Daily Call”, created and dedicated to you, the options trader, stock market investors or trading wannabe. This is your daily dose of actionable advice, tips, and strategies to help you learn how to generate and earn income investing with options.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    #141 - Which Options Strategy Has The Highest Return? Feb 10, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again at optionalpha.com and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we're going to be answering the question – "Which option strategy has the highest returns?" Before we actually go into this topic, I think it's important that we talk about the differentiation between returns and volatility in your account. This is something I yet to hear this often talked about and this difference between going after the highest, highest return versus something that has basically low volatility or stability in the portfolio. Imagine two different things before we even start this conversation. Imagine that you have a portfolio curve, so your bank account goes up and down every single day by $5,000. Now, if I just said that to you right now, some of you would think, "Holy cow! That's like all of my account. I could either lose or double my account every single day." Others of you may have said, "Well, that's not that much. I've got a larger account. $5,000 up or down is not a lot of volatility in my account."

    But what people don't think about is they don't think about these magnitude of changes that might occur based on what option strategy they trade and most often, people go after an option strategy purely looking for the highest returning option strategy with no context of how much volatility they might go through. Now, I say "might go through" because it doesn't mean that if there's a lot of volatility in your account, doesn't mean that it's a bad strategy. It just means that's the framework of the strategy, that the strategy is a strategy that ultimately is going to create a lot of volatility, but may actually lead to higher returns. In some cases, there's option strategies that we've back-tested that have lots of volatility that ultimately lead to lower returns. It is not a 1:1 relationship, meaning that if you have higher returns, that doesn't mean that you have to have higher volatility or vice versa. I think it's ultimately the context of the trading strategy that you build. But you have to understand these two different components because that is critical to your long-term success.

    I say that because what I've often seen people do is get into trading, they start either following our trades or doing trades using the back-tester and our watch list software that we built at Option Alpha. They start getting into trades and executing trades, going after the highest returning strategies and then they realize that those strategies means that you might have in some cases, a down month once or twice and then you might have two up months and then you might have three down months and then four up months. And so, there's a lot of volatility in their account and they just can't mentally handle the stability that's required or the patience that's required to trade through those types of scenarios. We all know that we're never going to have 100% winning trades, but sometimes people come into this assuming that that is the case and they are often blindsided by this up and down framework that happens among the trading strategy.

    I think before we even just start this discussion of what has the highest returns, what has the best returns over the long run, we have to understand how volatility impacts that. Now, the good news is that with our back-testing and trade optimization software that we've built which you can check out at optionalpha.com/toolbox, we factor that in. When you run a back-test, you can see how volatile was this account, what was the biggest drawdown, how long did that last and then you can see graphically how your stock performed against the S&P, so that you have an understanding before you even get into that trading strategy, what you might expect going forward in the future. Some people have even emailed me and said, "You know what? I'm looking at a strategy right now and it could return 10% a year, but I might go through a 30% drawdown. I'd rather have an 8% return with maybe a 10% drawdown. That's the differentiation. It's not to say that one is bad or different or better than the other. It's just what type of portfolio curve, what type of framework do you want in your account going forward which is really important.

    When we get back to the topic of just what is the highest returning strategies, this is an interesting one because there's obviously not one particular strategy that is the unicorn strategy. Everyone is looking for the unicorn. But there are strategies that work better in different market environments than others which is really important to know right off the bat. On a return basis, what you often find is that you often find the highest ROI strategies, meaning the actual credit received versus the actual amount of risk or capital that you have to put up is generally found in spreads. This can be credit spreads, put credit spreads, call credit spreads, iron condors, iron butterflies. That's generally the highest ROI strategies because you're taking in a credit and you have a fixed amount of risk that's associated with that, a max loss. Those generally end up being the highest ROI per trade strategies. Now, this is different and this is going to be an interesting conversation, so let me know on Facebook or Twitter how you guys think about this and what your comments are on this too. But this is different that actually keeping money in your account.

    The way that I look at it is there's highest return ROI strategies which in most cases, are defined risk strategies like credit spreads, iron condors, etcetera, but when you actually look at which strategies actually keep the most amount of money and ultimately lead to the highest total dollar profits, then those strategies end up being more of the undefined risk nature, meaning the straddles and the strangles. This is evident in our back-testing framework and our back-testing report that we publish which is called "the profit matrix." When we went through and back-tested millions of different option strategies over hundreds of different securities, millions of combinations, what we found is again, even though a strategy might have the best ROI on trade entry like an iron condor or an iron butterfly, that doesn't necessarily mean that it translates into the highest total dollar profit.

    What we see with straddles and strangles is we see higher total dollar profits, but at the expense sometimes of slightly higher volatility in the account because you're trading things that are more undefined risk that don't have built-in protection like an iron butterfly or an iron condor. And then what happens is that you generally get a little bit more flexibility in your account, meaning a little bit more of the ebbs and flows that come along with that, ultimately though, leading to generally higher returns and higher payouts on a total dollar basis. I think that's what you have to decide, is like which type of trader are you and are you willing to accept maybe some more ups or downs in your account over the long haul for higher returns or do you want more stability in your account that might end up being lower total dollar returns, but a good return on the money that you have invested and the capital that you put up in margin or risk exposure.

    Hopefully this helps out. As always, you guys can take a look at all the different things that we have and all the different strategies that work in different market environments using our trade optimizer software that we built at optionalpha.com/toolbox. It's a really, really useful tool just to see what strategy works best in the current market environment because it is very different. There's no one unicorn strategy that works best in all environment. If you're 10 days from expiration versus 30 versus 60, you might have to tweak your option strategy just a little bit. As always, hopefully this helps out. Until next time, happy trading!


    #140 - How Can Options Have Traded Volume But No Open Interest? Feb 09, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again at Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we are answering the question, "How can options have traded volume, but no open interest?" This one is one that I think really trips people up and sometimes I even have to slow down and think about this when I see this because it catches you off guard when you see this and it's not oftentimes in highly liquid securities. It's more often in underlyings and securities that are thinly traded or have low liquidity. But you might be looking at your options pricing table and you see that there's some volume for those contracts, but no open interest and this could be really the cause of one or two different things. That's really what I want to talk about here today.

    The first thing you have to understand about open interest is that it really is just this running account of contracts that are still open in the market. If for instance, somebody buys to open or sells to open a contract in the open market, then open interest goes up by 1. There's 1 now new contract created that somebody has basically entered into or between two different parties has been created and that also means that that one contract is increasing the trading volume for the day. Again, volume is the rotation or the frequency of trading and open interest is basically the depth of the market. That's how I think about it. How deep is the market? How many contracts are out there? And volume is the frequency or the rotation of trading.

    And so, again, if you are a new trader and let's say you're trading something brand new and nobody else is trading it, you open a contract either to sell or to buy, you open that contract, open interest goes up by 1 and then trading volume goes up by 1. Well, you could actually then decide that same day that you want to close out that contract. And so, you close your contract, you buy to close, you sell to close, it doesn't really matter. And so, volume goes up by 1 again because now, two contracts have been traded, they just happen to be your two contracts, but now, there's no contracts remaining, so open interest goes back down to 0 because the same contract that you opened, you then closed.

    And so, this is a really interesting concept because it trips people up because they don't quite know how to navigate this framework and really understand what happens. I think the key here is just understanding that just because open interest is 0 doesn't mean the contracts can't be created or haven't been created. In some cases for some of these thinly traded options, what happens is that you get into a situation where new contract months open up or new strike prices open up which can happen often all the time. If a stock is rallying really strong, they might open up some new strike prices that were not there before. And so, what you would see in our particular day is lots and lots of volume, but you may not see that open interest really show up until the next day. If those contracts are brand new or those strike prices are brand new, you might get a lot of volume, but the open interest and the total of the contracts remaining in some broker platforms may not show up until the next day. It seems like there's something wrong, but it's just maybe a little bit of a lag in a system.

    The other time that you would see open interest at 0, but lots of volume like I said, is in thinly traded options. This is what I see all the time where people try to email in and they're like, "Hey, look at this. I don't know what's going on. I can just see by the ticker symbol because I've never seen a ticker symbol before in my life that it's probably some low liquidity options and there's not that many people trading in it." Although there might be a lot of volume, it's just the same people opening and closing contracts back and forth with each other.

    Ultimately though, as an options trader, if you want to build this business to scale, you have to avoid markets that don't have any depth. And so, what I tell people all the time in training is that you have to go after markets and strike prices that have not only a lot of volume… And volume is a little bit subjective based on price and contract size, etcetera. But you have to go after things that have generally good volume, so lots of rotation, people actively trading and a lot depth. A lot of depth, meaning that there's a lot of contracts there, there's a big pool of buyers and sellers who are looking to engage in this contract. You take a look at just any regular symbol, any big ticker symbol like SPY or QQQ, IWM, you can see in those options chains, there's hundreds of thousands of contracts that have open interest and volume. Then you take a ticker symbol maybe something else that's a much smaller company, a lower market cap that's just starting to trade options and it's very thinly traded, you see like 1s and 0s all over the place because really, nobody's trading them. Avoid the thinly traded stuff, really focus on the highly liquid stuff and I don't think you'll actually have too much of an issue with open interest.

    Hopefully this helps answer your question. As always, if you guys have any other questions or want to hear different topics on the daily call, let me know. Shoot us an email, contact us on Twitter, Facebook, etcetera, leave us a private voicemail at optionalpha.com/ask, whatever you need to do to get your questions in here, so that we can get them answered for you. Until next time, happy trading!


    #139 - Where To Get Reliable Historical Market Data Feb 08, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again at Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, I want to show you where to get reliable historical market data. This is going to be for options data and also for general stock or equity data. I think the first thing I'll say with this is the keyword here is "reliable." There's a lot of data providers out there and a lot of data sources. One thing that we learned in building our back-testing software and our trade optimization software on Option Alpha is that not all data is the same. Even though two people or two different data providers might say that they're providing the same data, we've often found that lots of inconsistencies, it's not like millions and millions of inconsistencies, but a lot of inconsistencies among different data providers on end of day versus open of the day versus middle of the today, tick intervals, volatility metrics and volatility numbers, Deltas, Thetas and sometimes just flat out missing data or incomplete data. I think the key here is that if you're going to use data and trying to go through and use data for the purposes of back-testing or building models or algorithms, it's really, really important to go through the data and take some time to really clean or scrub the data as much as possible. I know it was something that took a lot more time than we anticipated when we originally built out back-testing software, is going through and scrubbing and cleaning that database.

    That said, I think I'll start with obviously the stock side. On the stock side, there's a lot of different places that you can go to. Probably one of the most readily available and for the most part, free for most traders is EOD data which is end of day data for a lot of different underlying securities and exchanges, probably a really good one to just start out with and get you some of the regular interval stuff on stock data down to end of day and then also intraday and the one minute quotes, so more readily available like I said than some of the other places out there. But frankly, you can go anywhere and get historical prices, Yahoo, Google. NASDAQ also has a really cool interface where you just type in a couple of symbols separated by commas and you get basically 10 years of historical price and volume for stocks of which then you can download and export. There's a lot of different sources I think for stock data and I think it's a lot more readily available and easily available than options data. On the option side, there's a bunch of different sources. Obviously, you can go to the CBOE, go to the NASDAQ. Another great source is ivolatility.com. They have a lot of historical data and also have Canadian and European options data history. There's also other providers like Tick Data, Quandl, etcetera that have lots and lots of databases. Again, it just ranges as to how much data they have, how far back it goes, tickers that they offer and then also, the quote levels that they have. So, is it just the bid and ask? Is it the last executed price at the end of the day? Do they have the volumes, open interest? Do they account for dividends and splits? There's really a lot of things that go into it that you have to be aware of as you start getting into it.

    The problem with options data though is that in most cases, options data is not complete and free right now. You have a lot of fragmented options data out there and most of it cost money too to download. In some cases, (and I'm just looking right now on one provider) the pricing just for one year of one symbol of options data is $500. Just to get enough data for one year of options trading history for one particular symbol can be as much as $500. Now, this is why you see that when we built our options back-testing software, it's an incredible value to everyone because it's a couple of hundred dollars one-time and you basically have access to decades of options trading data at your fingertips with different strategies and technology to trade different securities. I think we started with 50 tickers and we're going to be adding more tickers here in the future. You can see we probably put in the brunt of the expense for you in building this out and then hopefully are providing enough of a resource for you to see how valuable it is because if you try to do this by yourself, just buying one ticker symbol in one year would get you $500 of just raw cost and you still have nothing to do with that. It can provide real no value to you until you start having the ability to back-test and trade different option strategies. As always, you can check that out at optionalpha.com/toolbox and look and see what we have. If you have any questions on data sets that we've used before or where we've gotten them or any other resources you want to check out or share or if there's one I didn't see or say here which I'm sure there is because there's millions out there and you want to share it with our community, just let us know. As always, hopefully you guys enjoyed this. Until next time, happy trading!


    #138 - Why I've Never Run A Live Trading Room Feb 07, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again from Option Alpha and welcome back to the daily call. Today, I just want to describe why I've never run a live trading room and why honestly I have no intentions ever in my life to run a live trading room. Now, live trading rooms are insanely popular. I see them all over the place and I probably literally get maybe five or six request every single week to run a live trading room of some kind. Basically, what is a live trading room if you've never heard of it or if you don't know exactly how it works, but it would work basically like a live chat board. In most cases, I think that's mostly how they work, the ones that I've seen. But basically, people are in there live and they're trading and they're either showing their trades or they're commenting on their trades in chat back and forth to each other and it's just this big rolodex and board of talking back and forth and effectively sharing ideas. And why I like the idea on the outside of a trading room and what goes with a trading room, I think the actual implementation and execution of a trading room is often done really, really bad and often probably leads to bad mechanics and bad systemology of how you should be trading options in the first place.

    The ones that I've seen before… And I jump in and try to see what other people are doing and try to learn from other people as well. But what I generally see in trading rooms which is why I'll never run one live myself is a lot of just chatter and banter. Most of what I've ever seen is not really actually execution, it's not really actually the strategy mechanics behind it. It's a lot of noise. It's a lot of white noise and generally, a lot to follow and I think it's really hard for people getting in to assume that that's the regular standard protocol for how you should be trading, is lots of noise, lots of activity, banter back and forth and not really execution. I think what it also creates is it also creates this need to fill a gap. That's I think what the biggest problem with a trading room, is that you get somebody on there and they're supposed to be trading live. They end up looking for things that maybe aren't there. They end up getting into trades that maybe aren't there in the first place to fill the gap, to fill the white space of this hour block or two hour block that they have to run this live trading room. And so, again, it just breaks a lot of mechanical rules. You end up seeing people forcing trades all the time, breaking their own rules, doing things just because somebody made a comment that really isn't realistic to where maybe that position is setup or how that indicator is used. I find that it just creates a lot of white noise and ultimately, a lot of losing trades and very frustrated traders.

    The good news is that if you've ever run into that and if you've ever thought about running into that, the good news is that you don't actually need to be as part of a live trading room. I have a life. I have girls that I love to stay at home with and my wife is at home with me and so, I don't want to be associated to a computer and tethered to a computer, required to be at this room or be trading or watching the screen all day. That's the reason that we've built Option Alpha, so that people can learn how to trade the markets without having to stare at the markets. I think when you realize that, then you realize that you don't need a live trading room to be successful, that you can get in, wake up the morning, maybe execute a couple of trades a couple of days a week, it doesn't have to be all the time, but then let those trades manage themselves, use contingency orders, etcetera, use back-testing and trade optimization tools like we have at Option Alpha to help streamline that process. But ultimately, you don't need to be tethered to the computer. You can run your life. You can do whatever you want. You can still work your day job and do this. That's why I think running a live trading room maybe is going to falsely lead people into believing that they need to be glued to the screens all day which is another big reason why I don't do it.

    Hopefully it helps out and hopefully it answers a lot of questions that you might have about why we do or don't do one here at Option Alpha and I assume we'll never do one here in the future. But as always, if you guys need anything or have any questions, let me know. Until next time, happy trading!


    #137 - Passive DRIP Investing With High Dividend Yield REITs Feb 06, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again and welcome back to the daily call. On today's daily call, I want to talk about passive drip investing with high dividend yield REITs. This is something I guess near and dear to my heart because I used to be in the REIT industry. I was a REIT analyst outside Washington DC for a little while. And so, for REITs, I understand the business emphatically. I was in the business, I used to cover that business as a research analyst and I think it's a good business when you want to get into some sort of stable or corporate bond type real estate investing. Why do I say that? Because in most cases, REITs… And although there's a lot of variety of REITs… REITs by the way are Real Estate Investment Trust. In most cases with REITs, you can get into what are called triple net REITs which are basically REITs where all of the assumption of risk as far as taxes and maintenance and upkeep on the property is handled by the tenants.

    An example of this might be that a real estate investment trust or a REIT might come in and buy a Walgreens. They're not actually physically buying the Walgreens company, but they're buying the land and the building and the structure that the Walgreens is sitting on. But they might then sign a triple net lease with Walgreens itself on the corporate level, not on an individual location level, but it would be a corporate guarantee basically that Walgreens would just pay them a straight up rent amount, but all of the associated taxes and insurance and maintenance on the property would be maintained by Walgreens. The efficiency of a REIT is that you can generally have a lot of people who are… You can have a small amount of people who are investing a lot of capital without a lot of additional manpower, a lot of additional teams that need to be involved because everything's handled by individual tenants on a location by location basis. And so, what this basically is, is it basically become an essence of corporate bond with real estate attached to it. If you think about it that way, it's a really interesting type of product and it has a lot of tax favorable advantages for investors.

    What's cool about REITs I think not in particular right now because I think yields are okay. I think most of the REITs right now are 4% to 5% range right now which is nothing to obviously turn your head away from. But I think that in the future, we may see REIT yields come back up to somewhere around the 6%, 7% range and if it does, I think that's a more attractive entry for most long-term investors. If you can get into some of these REITs at a 6%, 7% yield with their dividends, some of them are paying monthly, some are paying quarterly or annually investment payments and generally, those payments have a stable steady line base and have very good annual increases or monthly increases in their payout. I think the trick with REITs is getting it at a pretty good level and really riding it out for a long-term haul and it's got to be maybe one portion of a long-term investing strategy for you.

    What I do with my wife's account because my wife has a 403B account which we can't trade options in unfortunately, but what I do in there is I do end up buying a lot of these high dividend yield REITs and then investing or basically converting those over in a passive drip investing format. Drip investing is Dividend Reinvestment Program where some of these companies will allow you… And you have to check with your broker and the specific company that you're trading. But many of them will allow you to do what's called drip investing. When you actually get paid a dividend, as long as that dividend is enough to cover either fractional or a full ownership of new shares, then you can apply that dividend right away to the purchase of new shares. It's just a self-fulfilling snowball that you basically create where you collect income. As long as you don't need that income to live off of, you reinvest it into more shares and then effectively, get more dividends, more shares, more dividends, more shares, etcetera.

    I like doing this in my wife's account because it's a long-term retirement account. We can't trade options in it. We're pretty much limited and I like having this stable stability in the account that I know that we're going to have pretty much a general REIT investment in there going forward long-term. Hopefully that helps out. Like I said, I wanted to offer just a little bit of different advice today and just tell you guys what we do on that end. I think it's a good alternative for sure if you want to put some money into REITs and start investing in there. Obviously, check them out. There's a lot of different types of REITs. They're out there. The triple net that we mentioned is a big market for that, but there's also very specific REITs like industrial or warehouse, office space, apartments, there's also lots of ones on like water parks and ski resorts. It's a very cool industry to be in for sure and something that I still follow very closely. As always, hopefully this helps out. Until next time, happy trading!


    #136 - The Dow Jones Industrial Average: A Broken Index Or Still Worth Following? Feb 05, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, it's Kirk here again and welcome back to the daily call. Today, we are going to be looking at the Dow Jones Industrial Average, commonly referred to as the Dow and trying to answer the question, "Is this a broken index or still something worth following?" I think the first thing obviously is just understanding what is the Dow. If you're never heard of the Dow… I'm sure if you've traded for a while or if you've been in the markets, you've undoubtedly heard of the Dow Jones or somebody call it the Dow or people even just refer it honestly as the market, even though it's not the only measure of the market. But the Dow Jones is basically a price weighted average of the top or the biggest 30 largest American publicly traded company. It's usually done by market cap or by size, not necessarily by stock price. But what we mean by price weighted is that it also means that the higher priced stocks sometimes have more influence on the index performance versus lower priced stocks.

    There's oftentimes where these companies will come into and out of the index, so it's not like it's updated every single day. If Apple becomes now the largest, then it goes in and then the next day, Apple becomes not the largest, it goes out. It's usually some of the bigger companies that consistently stay at the larger market caps that stay in. And then basically, what we do is we follow these largest 30… They call it the industrial companies because it was originally created I think in 1896 and so, that was more of an industrial time. But now, there's a lot of technology companies in there, but still a lot of retail and export, energy companies, etcetera, places like some of the components are things like Apple, Caterpillar, Coca-Cola, Axon, Goldman Sachs, Home Depot, IBM, Intel, etcetera.

    One of the components I think that's actually interesting at least at this time right now is GE which is General Electric which I think is still one of the only original 12 components in the Dow. I think there was only 12 originally and GE was one of their original ones in 1896. Although it's still in the index as of right now, I don't know if GE will actually stay in the Dow index because its stock price is just basically cratering right now and so, therefore, it's losing a ton of market value and may be surpassed by something else. It'll be interesting actually in the next couple of months to see how that ends up working out. But like I said, there's components that frequently come in and out. Apple, Goldman Sachs, Nike and I think Visa all were added in the past three years. Some of those newer companies, some of these technology companies are starting to come up, start to get added to the index and it starts to reweight everything going forward.

    I think some of the major benefits to looking at the Dow and tracking the Dow… We do and you can trade the Dow with options using the ticker symbol DIA. But one of the big benefits is just knowing as a whole group where these 30 largest companies are going. Obviously, they've become a bell weather for the market, for the economy here in the US. If you have a good idea of where these 30 companies are going and you can track their prices on average, then it's a good idea, a good indicator of where the market is and how healthy the economy is. Like I said earlier, when I just listed the names of some of the companies in the Dow, you can see it is a wide variety of different indexes and sectors, so it's not totally focused on tech like maybe NASDAQ is, but it is a wide variety.

    The biggest downside I think to the Dow obviously is that it's only 30 stocks, so it's not really a huge basket of securities and in most cases, there's a couple of thousand different stocks or ETFs that you can trade that might give a better representation of things. Obviously, the S&P 500 is considered the market portfolio. The efficient portfolio frontier is where that's at. I think that's maybe a better representation of the overall market and a better target to shoot for, for beating risk-adjusted returns. But at the same time, the Dow is not by any stretch, something that we don't look at. It's not something that we're going to totally ignore. I just think you have to use it in the context of what it is. It's the largest companies, therefore in some cases, maybe the smallest moving companies, but the most stable companies as well. Hopefully this helps out. As always, if you guys have any comments or questions, let me know. Until next time, happy trading!


    #135 - The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Role In The Market Feb 04, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again and welcome back to the daily call. On today's daily call, we are going to talk about the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, more formerly known as the CBOE. You probably hear these terms or these letters thrown out all the time, but I want to let you guys know what their role is in the market, what they do and also, why we need them and the products that they offer.

    I think the first thing to know is that it is the largest options exchange in the world. The CBOE was started back in 1973 and really, the role of the CBOE is to be just a medium of exchange. They we're probably one of the first and probably if not, the foremost in standardizing contracts with options. When they started, option contracts had no standard size. Now, we have generally standard sizes, 100 shares per contract, etcetera, standard expiration dates. And so, the CBOE was probably a big part of that in the early days. A lot of the contracts that they trade now are tons and tons of ETF options, stock options, leaps, interest rate options, foreign currencies and they're also huge on index options. One of their biggest products is the SPX index options, so they manage that as well. And then more recently, they've gotten into bitcoin futures which has been a very recent development in the last couple of months that they started trading those as well. Again, the CBOEs role is just to be this big medium of exchange, the standardization in the market which I think is important because it creates some consistency and some framework around how traders can maneuver the markets.

    I will say that CBOE, their role in the market is not as important as the OCC which is the Options Clearing Corp. If you've listened to the previous videos or watched previous tutorials that we've done here at Option Alpha, you know that the OCC is basically the one central clearing corporation that both issues contracts and ensures that they're going to be legitimate with other buyers and sellers. If somebody issues a contract, even though they might exchange that contract through the CBOE system, it still has to be cleared by the OCC. For me, I think that these two parties work very, very closely together and one cannot really exist without the other. The CBOE's default risk and their systematic risk in the market would be much, much, much higher if they didn't have somebody like the OCC as a clearing mechanism that protects everyone else behind them and basically ensures that both the buyer and the seller are going to pay up on their obligations.

    There's obviously a lot of different options exchanges out there. The CBOE is not the only one, but they are by far the biggest one and one of the most on the leading edge as far as products and innovations. I know they came up with leaps, non standardized contracts were a big thing, so the introduction of weeklies which actually is more of a recent thing than most people think, weeklies actually haven't been around that long, but the CBOE was right at the forefront of that and also, their volatility index. We can't go without saying that CBOE was the first to really launch some sort of market volatility index back in the day and still use today as the fear index or the VIX. And so, that product is like an in-house product for them and obviously a very huge success. Hopefully this helps out. Again, there's not really too much else to say on this, but if you have any questions on obviously CBOE or any of the other different options exchanges, just let me know. Until next time, happy trading!


    #134 - Candlestick Patterns - Can Options Traders Use Them Better Entries & Exits? Feb 03, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone and welcome back to the daily call. This is Kirk here again from Option Alpha and on today's daily call, we're going to talk about candlestick patterns, more specifically, answering the question, "Can options traders use these for better entries and exits?" What are candlestick patterns? Well, look. They've been around for generations, decades and it's basically just a way to visually or graphically represent price movement or price trend in particular markets. Now, these can be done on a daily basis, intraday, weekly, monthly basis. Where you often see them obviously is in a lot of stock charting software and it's become honestly the standard, not anything else in the investing space. For the last call it two decades or so, you see pretty much every stock chart has candlestick patterns. The reason they call them candlestick pattern is because they look like candles in some cases. They have these wicks and they have these main bodies. The idea is that visually looking at these wicks and main bodies and how large or small they are in relation to prior days or recent days can give us some sort of indication of where the markets might go or where the markets might trend.

    Now, we've got a lot of content on candlestick patterns because I use them probably a lot more when I started out and maybe I just relied on them a lot more when I started out. Right or wrong, I was very attracted to candlestick patterns early on because I learned about them in my time in New York and I figured that, "Hey look. If they watch them and monitor them there that I would too." I've come to realize though that candlestick patterns I think do serve I think a purpose for options traders, though they are not the rule, meaning that you don't have to use candlestick patterns. I do find that for myself, knowing a lot of candlestick patterns that are out there, especially looking at days where we have just huge movements in the underlying market or huge reversals really, that those can maybe give me a little bit of indication of where the market either A, might be going or might not be going. There's patterns like morning stars and evening crosses and things like that. I mean, there's these all kinds of funky names for patters. Falling windows, shooting stars, dark cloud covers, whatever you want to call it. But the reality is that I think it does give us a good maybe visual just like secondary or third level clue as to maybe where things are going.

    The way that I like to use them in particular is just to see strength in the market. If you see a hammer pattern which the market opens up, it falls dramatically, but then it recovers that entire fall during the day and maybe closes near the open or above the open. That'll generate what's called generally like a hammer pattern or a hammer candlestick on the chart. What that shows just through its visual nature is that the market fell for some reason, but was able or strong enough to recover all or most of the fall that it had during the day. You see the same thing on the other end where you see these what are called shooting stars where the market opens, it rallies significantly higher, but then falls all the way back down to where it opened, basically gives up all of its gains, it couldn't hold onto it. Maybe that tells us something about where the market is going, maybe at a point at which it's maybe weak or vulnerable and could be turning over.

    Do I think you need it to be to be successful trading? No, because we've built back-testing software that never looks at candlestick patterns. And so, you can create a replicatable system just by entering positions and managing them properly, position sizing, etcetera. Our software never looked at candlesticks to say, "Okay, we're going to enter a position on this day or exit a position on this day based on a candlestick pattern." But again, when I'm looking at it, maybe it makes me think twice about going long or short for that particular moment. Maybe I wait one day just to see what happens in the market. If I see a shooting star, maybe I wait a day if I'm going to go long or bullish on something or it maybe might lead me to believe now might be a good time to get into a position that's bearish.

    I think you have to use them in conjunction with other things, is really what it comes down to. I never use candlestick patterns by themselves. I never use technical analysis by itself. It always comes back down to that core option strategy and then maybe some little stuff that can help engage you and visually stimulate maybe where the market is going. Hopefully that helps out. I know it's a big question. Like I said, we've got a lot of content on candlestick patterns right here at Option Alpha and maybe by the time that this actually goes out or very soon afterwards, we're going to be trying to put together a nice little course on candlestick patterns just to help people understand what they are and how to use them and how we look at them which should be good. As always, let me know if you guys have any questions. Until next time, happy trading!


    #133 - How Do You Monitor An Option Trade's Risk After Making Adjustments? Feb 02, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone, Kirk here again and welcome back to the daily call. Today, I'm going to answer a question from one of our users on Twitter who sent this in which I appreciate. Again, you can reach us through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, however you want to get your question in. Just get it in, so we can get it added to the queue here. But the question was, "How do you monitor an option trade's risk after making adjustments?" The idea was, "Okay. If I know that I have a 1% risk on entry, whether I'm doing it based on margin requirement or whether I'm doing it as a fixed defined risk spread, so the spread I know is $2 wide as an iron condor or $5 wide as an iron condor and that represents 1% of risk in my account. I know that on entry, but what happens after I start adjusting? How do I monitor that risk in the trade?"

    I think it's actually pretty easy and I'll talk about two concepts here in today's daily call because I want to touch on both of these. The first is that if you are trading defined risk strategies, then monitoring your risk after an adjustment is still as simple as making sure that you understand where your widest spread is because on defined risk strategies where you're doing a spread, you're selling one contract, you're buying another, risk is always based off of the widest spread. You can do an iron condor and have a $3 wide spread on the put side and a $3 wide spread on the call side. Now, the widest spread on either side is $3. If you do something that's a little bit skewed, maybe you do a $5 wide spread on the call side. Well, your risk is going to be based off of that widest spread, that $5 wide spread. If you start making adjustments, as long as your spread width doesn't increase, meaning you don't increase the width of a spread, then your risk is still going to be the same. It's still going to have the same potential to lose money or whatever the dollar figure is that you have as risk. It's still going to have that same 1% if you targeted 1% on trade entry. That doesn't change. When you go to a margin-type scenario where you're trading short strangles, short straddles, we based risk based off of the initial margin requirement. And so, that means that if we make an adjustment to a trade, that maybe our margin requirement either goes up or down. We could adjust into a position that actually requires less capital because of where implied volatility is and where we are in relationship to expiration.

    I usually air on the side of caution with short positions that are undefined risk straddles and strangles and I always tell people, "You want to enter those with a lower percentage allocation on entry, knowing that you might just have to hold more capital in the future if you need to make adjustments." Most of the trades that we do in that realm, around the 1% to 2% as the initial entry, so even if we get into a couple of laddered positions, they'll still never make up more than 1% to 2% of our account. The reason is because if we have to make an adjustment, then we might have to hold more capital in margin to cover that position. Now, that doesn't mean that it's going to lose money. Just holding capital and margin does not mean that that's going to be the money that you lose. It just means you have to hold more money in margin. And we just want to have the room in our portfolio, the flexibility to be able to hold that margin and make an adjustment because adjustments do help reduce risk. They increase our credit, they give us more duration in trades and they ultimately end up making us more successful. We want room in our portfolio to make those adjustments.

    Now, getting back to defined risk trades, you could also make an adjustment that widens your spread width. If you make an adjustment that widens your spread width, maybe you roll down a call option and go from a $5 wide spread on the call side to a $7 wide spread on the call side. Just understand that your risk is now based off of the $7 spread as opposed to the $5 spread that you had originally. Again, it's very easy to make adjustments and monitor those because it's all based on spread width or margin requirement. Again, getting back to just the basics of trading, the fundamentals of trading – Keep your trade entry small to begin with until you understand how to calculate a lot of this. I suggest like this person did on Twitter and I think this was great. They started with 1% risk and then left them lots and lots of room to either allocate more to it if they needed to or to adjust into a position that required more capital just for holding purposes during that time period. And so, I think you start small and then go higher if you need to as far as the allocation versus trying to do it the other way. Trying to start at 5% or 6% allocation and then trying to ratchet it back and adjust at the same time probably doesn't work out all too well or at least, you could get yourself into a situation where Murphy's Law takes hold and something that will happen bad ends up happening bad and that creates a nice little drawdown in your account which you didn't want in the first place.

    As always, hopefully you guys enjoy these. If you have any comments or questions like this person did, again, reach out to us, shoot us a message on Facebook, send us a tweet, reach out to us on Instagram, wherever you want to connect with us. We would love to know what your guys' questions are at options trading, so we can get it queued up for the daily call. Until next time, happy trading!


    #132 - Comparing Long Term Vs Short Term Options Feb 01, 2018
    Show notes

    Hey everyone and welcome back, this is Kirk here again at Option Alpha and on today's daily call, we are going to talk about the differences between long-term and short-term option contracts. Now again, this is going to be just really a high level discussion. Somebody submitted a question and said, "Basically, I just want to know… What are the main differences? What are just the broad strokes, things that we need to consider or think about as we start to think about trading shorter-term contracts, maybe weeklies versus longer-term contracts, a month or two months out?" Obviously, if you want more information on when to trade each or how far out to trade different strategies, check out our toolbox software which allows you to back-test different strategies, add different time periods, weekly contracts, monthly contracts. You can get a better idea of what works better in a given market environment or a given scenario and that's available at optionalpha.com/toolbox.

    First, let's start with long-term. Long-term options, I think what you'll see in long-term options obviously is less price movement. They have more time until expiration. That's basically what it comes down to. Their prices are less volatile. That doesn't mean their prices don't move. It just means that they are less likely to have these huge jumps or drops in price. You're going to have more stable contracts. But you're also going to see in most cases, wider spreads. If you start trading further out… This is really if you're trading something that's even still insanely liquid, but now, trading super, super far out, 90, 120, 200 days out which is not something we do. But if you do end up doing those leap-type contracts, you're going to see much wider spreads in pricing because frankly, nobody is trading that far out or very few people are trading that far out. With longer-term contracts, you do have more time for adjustments, so you have the ability to be patient and let the market come to you and go through maybe a couple of cycles of ups and downs in price along the way and still have plenty of time to make adjustments. You're not going to be forced into an adjustment scenario because of timeline, so that helps out as well.

    There is a bigger volatility risk in longer-term contracts. Remember, volatility as it changes is going to impact those longer-dated contracts much more so than shorter-dated contracts because the likelihood that the stock is now going to go on a huge run for three months or a huge drop for three months is higher. When you trade longer-term contracts, the importance of knowing where implied volatility is becomes a little bit more paramount. And then, longer-term contracts have just frankly more premium. It's no surprise because there's a lot of time to go until expiration, there's a lot of volatility premium, a lot of time decay in here. And so, it's longer or bigger premiums on both sides. If you're going to buy options, you're going to pay more money. If you're going to sell options, you're going to collect more money upfront.

    Now, when we talk about shorter-term option contracts, I think the big thing is that they're going to have much quicker Theta decay. We know from research that Theta decay or time decay starts to really accelerate around like 30 days. That's when we start to see the graph of Theta decay go almost parabolic as it starts to approach expiration. And so, for that reason, it's now running up against the clock and if you're an option seller, that's good. You collect Theta decay. That's a way that you profit. Shorter-term option contracts collect Theta decay a little bit faster, but what they end up having is more Gamma risk. Gamma risk as opposed to what we talked about with long-term contracts is this concept that the price of the underlying option contract has the ability to move dramatically with a very small tweak in the underlying stock price because again, as we get closer to expiration, it's now make it or break it. This contract either is worth something or it's not. And so, small movements in price of the underlying stock can cause a really wide or big movement in the underlying option contract which again, could be good or bad. I mean, it could work in both cases either for you or against you.

    Shorter-term contracts also leave a lot less time for adjustments. Because the time period that you're trading is let's say a week or a couple, like two weeks at the most for these shorter-term contracts, it doesn't really leave you a lot of room for adjustments. If the stock makes a move two days before expiration and three days before expiration, you don't really have much time to do anything. Maybe you make a small tweak, but it's not really going to do much to reduce risk or improve your position. You're kind of handcuffed a little bit in the sense that you don't have the ability to adjust these positions as it approaches expiration. And then obviously, you collect a much smaller premium. Look. The markets are pretty fair and efficient. They realize that there's little time left, so if you start selling options out of the money on these weekly contracts, yes, you have the ability to collect money and get to expiration in 10 days or five days, but the market is going to reflect that risk in much smaller premiums, so you're going to collect much smaller amounts because you have the ability to maybe realize that profit much quicker in the case of weekly options and so, you don't just collect as much as longer-term contracts. Not to say one is necessarily better than the other. It's just to understand the dynamics of each, these long-term contracts and short-term contracts.

    You know how we trade here at Option Alpha based on our profit matrix research and all the back-testing that we do through our toolbox that I mentioned earlier. I think there's a place for each of these in your portfolio. Most of the trading that we do is longer-term contracts, so 30 to 60 days in that time period, but we also do some weekly trades. We also do some weekly trades to add some stability to our portfolio and add some consistent income on a weekly basis. I don't think that the weekly trades will ever overshadow what we do on the long-term contracts. The long-term contracts are the core of what we do and then we sprinkle in or filter in some weekly trades around it. But otherwise, we still focus on that long-term premium which we find in back-testing, it actually works better than a lot of weekly trades replicated over time. Hopefully that helps out. As always, if you guys have any questions, let me know. Until next time, happy trading!


    Previous 1 65 66 67 68 69 81 Next

    Related Podcasts

    How I Built This with Guy Raz

    1

    How I Built This with Guy Raz Business
    Planet Money

    2

    Planet Money Business
    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    3

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast

    4

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast Business
    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast

    5

    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast Business
    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn

    6

    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn Business
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights