TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day — and following the Court’s decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it “information sourcing,” and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. 

    *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2026 Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Culbertson v Berryhill Jan 10, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    The 25% cap on social security attorney fees only covers in court representation, not representation before the agency.

    Support the show


    Shoop v Hill Jan 07, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Mostly a decision that 2254 (d) (1) apeals can not use court cases that didn’t exist at the time of the origin of the appeal.

    Support the show


    Escondido v Emmons Jan 07, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court rules that “right to be free of excessive force” is a bit to highly generalized to be considered “clearly established law” in regards to stripping qualified immunity.
    Court also holds you can’t reinstate an excessive force claim, without any proof or even discussion, as to if the defendant even touched the plaintiff — especially after it has already been decided by another court that the defendant did not, because of body camera video footage proving no contact. (Sadly, not a joke).

    Support the show


    US v Stitt Dec 10, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Burglary can include mobile residences and or vehicles adapted for sleeping.

    Support the show


    Weyerhaeuser v USFWS Nov 27, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    The Dusky Gopher Frog case.
    Regarding designation of critical habitat.

    Support the show


    Mt Lemon v Guido (ADEA) Nov 06, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court hold that ADEA numerosity limitation does not apply to state government subdivisions.

    Support the show


    Pavan v Smith (2016 opinion) Aug 29, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Decision from 2016, in re gay couples and birth certificates.

    Support the show


    Trinity Lutheran v Comer Missouri (2016 opinion) Aug 18, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Opinion from 2016, just to keep the feed active Court holds Missouri can not deny a grant to a church based on the fact it is a church. (RJ likes this one because his beloved mother was a teacher at a lutheran pre-school for most of her life).

    Support the show


    NC v Covington (gerrymandering) Jul 14, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Court upholds part of a gerrmandering solution.

    Support the show


    Sexton v Beaudreaux Jun 29, 2018
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Strickland claim review.

    Support the show


    Previous 1 49 50 51 52 53 59 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights