TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day — and following the Court’s decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it “information sourcing,” and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. 

    *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2026 Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Azar v Allina health (Medicare “fraction”) Jun 04, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    In re notice and comment when changing substanitive rules.

    Support the show


    Ft Bend, TX v Davis (EEOC) Jun 04, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    About claim filing rules.

    Support the show


    Mont v US (supervised release tolling) Jun 03, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Prisoner does not get credit for his pre trial custody in re his supervised release for another crime.

    Support the show


    Smith v Berryhill (SSA Appeals) May 30, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Definition of “final decision”

    Support the show


    Home depot v Jackson (who can remove to federal court) May 30, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Third party counterclaim defendants can not remove to federal court.

    Support the show


    Box v Planned Parenthood (Fetal Disposition law) May 29, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Explicitly stated not to be case about the right to an abortion, although i’m sure the news media will tell you so.
    Still have a bit of a sore throat, so apologies on some audible swallowing noises etc.

    Support the show


    Nieves v Bartlett (Retaliatory arrest) May 28, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Retaliatory arrest claim defeated by probable cause to arrest.

    Support the show


    Merck & Dohme v Albrecht (Duty to warn/impossibly doctrine) May 21, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    A clarification on what is considered clear evidence that a drug company could not fulfill it’s duty to warn in light of FDA refusals to allow label changes.

    Support the show


    Herrera v WY (Treaty hunting rights) May 20, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Bighorn national forest is not “occupied lands” in the context of an 1865 treaty. Said treaty did not expire upon Wyoming's statehood.

    Support the show


    Mission v Tempnology (contracts in bankruptcy) May 20, 2019
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Breach of a contract under the bankruptcy code still constitutes breach of a contract in this instance.

    Support the show


    Previous 1 45 46 47 48 49 59 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights