TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day — and following the Court’s decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it “information sourcing,” and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients. 

    *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2026 Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    NY Rifle and Pistol v Bruen (2a) Jun 28, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Striking down New York’s restrictions on concealed carry licensing.

    Support the show


    Shurtleff v Boston (Free speech v Establishment Clause) Jun 25, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Here A flag at city hall is not government speech.

    Support the show


    Cummimgs v Premier Rehab (Remedies for federally funded programs) Jun 25, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Here Emotional distress damages are not allowed.

    Support the show


    Boechler v IRS (§6330(d)(1) tolling) Jun 25, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    This particular subsection is toll-able

    Support the show


    Dobbs v [Jackson] Women’s Health (Abortion) Jun 25, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Roe and Casey are overruled.

    Support the show


    US v VAELLO MADERO (Territory governance) Jun 04, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Support the show


    Brown v Davenport Jun 04, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    In this case the AEDPA and Brect must BOTH be followed.

    Support the show


    CASSIRER v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA (FSIA — Choice of law) May 31, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    My limited understanding:
    Sovereign entities sued under FSIA (but without a separate cause of action implicating federal jurisdiction) are subject to the choice of law provision of the courts which would otherwise be the lawsuit’s venue.


    Eg. Where you would have had to bring the underlying, non-FSIA/non-federal, Lawsuit where you found the law.

    Support the show


    Austin, TX v Reagan National Advertising (1a Free Speech) May 31, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    The requirement to read a sign to determine it’s compliance, by reference to the sign’s location, with a city ordinance banning off premises advertising, does not infringe 1a freedom of speech.

    Support the show


    Badgerow v Walters (Arbitration Jurisdiction FAA Look through) May 15, 2022
    Show notes

    Send us Fan Mail

    Sections 9 and 10 do not contain “look through” provisions

    Support the show


    Previous 1 27 28 29 30 31 59 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights