TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Arts

    Subtext: Conversations about Classic Books and Films

    Subtext is a book club podcast for readers interested in what the greatest works of the human imagination say about life’s big questions. Each episode, philosopher Wes Alwan and poet Erin O’Luanaigh conduct a close reading of a text or film and co-write an audio essay about it in real time. It’s literary analysis, but in the best sense: we try not overly stuffy and pedantic, but rather focus on unearthing what’s most compelling about great books and movies, and how it is they can touch our lives in such a significant way.

    Advertise

    Copyright: Copyright © 2020-2024 | (sub)Text | All Rights Reserved

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Business Gets Personal in “The Godfather” (1972) Mar 01, 2021
    Show notes

    Out of the darkness of the opening frames comes a supplicant— Buonasera the undertaker. He pleads for the justice that the American legal system denied him. As the camera draws back, we see the outline of a face, a hand… Don Corleone holds court at the confluence of loyalty and duress, generosity and calculation, power and fragility. It is not money, but friendship that he asks of Buonasera. Within and without the world of the film, can one consider Don Corleone a great man? Or does his moral code, like his favor, always hide a transaction? Wes & Erin give their analysis of Francis Ford Coppola’s 1972 film, “The Godfather.”

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    (post)script: Post-Hall: Pimps, Pills, and Automobiles Feb 22, 2021
    Show notes

    Listen to more episodes of (post)script at Patreon. Wes & Erin continue their discussion of Annie Hall; Wes pines to revisit his many unwritten essays, including the one about love and nostalgia in Woody Allen films. We discuss whether Mike Nichols used crack, and the way Google’s algorithms mercilessly hunt Wes down to forcibly dose him with information about the director, all because of a few searches. Wes couldn’t get through Clue, but that may be due to the variability of his many movie moods, and in any case Erin’s Madeline Kahn impression captures a redeeming attitude. We discuss My Favorite Wife (my favorite life?). It’s great, but it bogs down halfway through. By contrast, Annie Hall‘s use of free association helps it navigate the precarious second act, and keeps it brisk (despite its exceptionally long shots, on average of 14 seconds). Erin is reading a new biography of LSD aficionado Cary Grant, called A Brilliant Disguise, according to which director Leo McCarey‘s car accident changed him forever. Also, McCarey apparently admitted on his deathbed that his greatest frustration in life was never sleeping with Irene Dunne. Probably a frustration for most of us, but fortunately we get to enjoy the eidetic romantico-comical pairing of Dunne and Grant. Throne of Blood is so much more than samurai yelling at each other: there’s the incredibly creepy and insidious Lady Macbeth character, who motivates her husband by stoking his paranoia in a way that involves more psychological realism than the original play. Not to mention the transplendant, sing-songy witch, which in turn reminds Wes of Beverly in Abigail’s Party by Mike Leigh (played by Alison Steadman): wonderful, trippy, darkly comic, but ultimately indescribable. Erin recently watched Elevator to the Gallows to celebrate the birthday of Jeanne Moreau, and is reading Great Expectations (coming to (sub)Text as soon as Wes has the time to re-read it). But David Lean’s adaptation of the novel disappoints: Alec Guinness looks like a pimp, and a nightmare vaudevillian Miss Havisham looks like she’s on ludes. We humblebrag about two recent positive reviews, and post-game our first ad, wondering whether this was the first time a conversation about a poem was made possible by the selling of drugs. So support us on Patreon, and you’ll be doing your part to keep pills out of poetry and where they belong, in the medicine cabinets of Mike Nichols, Cary Grant, and Miss Havisham. Transcript 0:00 Erin: Welcome to Postscript, the subtext after show where we talk about things related and unrelated to the week's episode. This is Erin O'Luanaigh. 0:07 Wes: And this is Wes Alwan. Okay, so we just recorded on Annie Hall. That's like a dream come true for me to. You know, I always wanted to write something about it, but of course, that hasn't happened. But just to have a public conversation about that is great. 0:20 Erin: Yeah. What would you write about if you could write about it? What would be the. Just the idea of nostalgia. 0:25 Wes: Yeah. 0:25 Erin: Yeah, yeah. 0:26 Wes: And actually, there's an essay I want to do kind of with regard to Woody Allen films in general, because I think that sort of finds its way into everything he does. 0:33 Erin: That's great. Well, I really enjoyed what you had to say about that. It was really enlightening. 0:37 Wes: Likewise. Likewise. 0:39 Erin: Oh, we need to talk about how Mike Nichols used crack according to an upcoming biography. 0:46 Wes: So. Yeah, so for listeners, we have, like, a little slack to communicate, and we have some channels. Like, we have, like, a reading and viewing log in our Postscript channel. I just threw up this thing about Page Six. I don't know what publication that is, but Mike Nichols use crack upcoming biography claims. I basically, I get these in my Google News feed because in preparing for the Graduate episode, I must have Googled him. And therefore, now I must, you know, Google News must inform me every time something happens with respect to Mike Nichols. And, like, I get alert after alert about one salacious detail after another from this new biography. So. And you said, I doubt this very much. 1:29 Erin: Yeah, I do doubt it. But, you know, he was very productive. 1:33 Wes: Yeah. 1:35 Erin: You mentioned in a different Slack channel that you couldn't get through Clue. 1:41 Wes: Yeah. Sorry. 1:42 Erin: Could you explain that, please, and give your defense before sentencing? 1:46 Wes: I just. I hated it. 1:49 Erin: What? Okay, you have to be. First of all, you gotta be a little bit drunk. 1:53 Wes: Yeah. 1:54 Erin: Second of all, you've gotta be in a big group of people. 1:56 Wes: Yeah. 1:57 Erin: And third of all, you need me to do my Madeline Kahn voice along with Madeline Kahn and everything she says. 2:03 Wes: So now you have to do that voice. You can't just. 2:06 Erin: I hated her so much. I just. Sorry. 2:11 Wes: That's great. 2:12 Erin: It's great. It's a great. Yeah, it's really campy. And it takes a little work to kind of, like, get on the wavelength of the movie. But if you're not on the same wavelength, it can be hard to get there. 2:22 Wes: Maybe it's a mood thing, I think. 2:24 Erin: Yeah. 2:25 Wes: My reaction to movies actually varies significantly according to my mood. Usually Annie hall, for instance, is a transcendent experience. 2:34 Erin: I thought it was more Kafkaesque, but I mean that as a compliment. 2:38 Wes: Yeah. This is the first time it wasn't. It might have been just because I had to do it and I was taking notes to the whole thing and pausing, you know, and just like, oh, God, yeah, I've turned this into work now. And I enjoyed it. I enjoyed it. It's just in the past. Every viewing has just been this. For me, that's kind of sublime. But. So, yes, I can give Clue another try. I can pick up where I left off and see what happens. 3:00 Erin: You know, it's a movie that comes in at, like, a very high pitch. It's, like, you know, hard to meet that craziness and the zaniness of the movie if you're not kind of gelling with it. So I. I kind of understand that. I think I've probably turned it off before because I was just like, oh, I can't do this right now. Yeah, that reminds me something that you watched a while ago, but we never talked about. And I was just curious to hear your reaction about my favorite wife. I know that was a while ago now, but did you like that? 3:26 Wes: Yes, I really did. I loved, like, the first half, and I can't give all the details on this, but I thought it got a little bogged down. So what I think happens in a lot of movies is, like, act two is really hard to sustain. It's, like, sometimes twice as long as Acts 1 and 3. And it's a sort of. A lot of transitional stuff before, you know, as you get into the third act and things really start with. You get a lot more momentum towards the climax. It's a place where screenplays generally bogged down. So it's not an uncommon thing. And I'm. You know, I think it's part of my impatience now. And so it's partly my problem. Although, like, the second act, I think, is one. One thing that Annie hall does really, really well, in part because it's. I think free association works very well. We didn't go a lot into it in the. In the episode, but the. You know, a lot of the transitions in the movie, it's not just moving forward in time. One thing happens after the other. It's. It's mental free association. And I think somehow that gives more momentum to the second act because there's kind of a psychological urgency to it. So coming back to this movie, I just. I think I'm. Towards the end of the second act, I was getting impatient, but I loved, loved, loved the first half of the movie. And I was pausing occasionally to try to do my. To practice my Cary Grant accent, which I'm not going to try to do here. I can do little Christopher Walken, but I can't do Cary Grant. 4:49 Erin: Yeah. I mean, one of the things, though, about Annie hall, it's just like, it's so fast, you know, it goes so quickly. It so speedily chugs along. And it's so inventive. 4:58 Wes: It does. But by the way, the shots are, on average, 14 seconds long, which is very, very long. 5:03 Erin: Yeah, yeah. 5:04 Wes: Most movies are four to six seconds or something. But it does chug along, as you say. 5:08 Erin: Yeah, yeah. And the inventiveness of it is amazing. But. Yeah. So my favorite wife is. 5:16 Wes: I think it's my favorite life. 5:19 Erin: Sorry. Yeah. It was supposed to be directed by Leo McCarey. And so part of the reason why that movie is so disjointed is because Garson Kanin ended up having to step in and direct it unexpectedly. And so it was actually. It was a huge disappointment, I think, for Irene Dunne, like, creatively, because she thought that it was going to be as inventive and fun as the awful Truth. And she actually complained about the exact same thing that you're complaining about. But one of the things that I read. So I've been reading this Cary Grant biography that just came out. 5:52 Wes: Did he do crack as well? 5:54 Erin: No, he did do lsd. I mean, but that's pretty well documented. But anyway, the reason why. So he got into a car accident, McCarey. Because he was driving drunk at 95 miles an hour when he slammed into a 1924 Packard. It was. It was really serious. It said the accident report lists multiple burns, gouge wounds, lacerations and contusions, broken bones and a possible skull fracture. 6:18 Wes: Wow. 6:19 Erin: Then there was this little sort of ending part to this section on my favorite wife in this book, which really shook me to use the term that the kids are using, which is that. Well, first of all, he emerged from the accident kind of like never being the same. But also that McCarey and Irene Dunne, she was a very devout Catholic, happily married, but the two of them had this, like, weird, sexy vibe between them where she, I guess, was, like, kind of interested in him, and he was super interested in her. And it said that he went to his deathbed saying that the fact that he had never slept with Irene Dunne was the greatest frustration of his life. And I just, like, could not get over that. Anyway. 7:04 Wes: Yeah, well, it's the greatest Frustration of my life as well. I never even met her. 7:11 Erin: I just couldn't get over that. But anyway, yeah, so as you were telling me that you had watched My Favorite Wife, I was reading that, going, oh, my God. Just couldn't get over it. 7:21 Wes: This is a new biography of Cary Grant. 7:24 Erin: It is, yeah. It's Cary Grant, A Brilliant Disguise by Scott Eyman. A couple of biographies came out about him just recently, and there were two of them that were reviewed by David Thomson recently, I think, in LRB or tls, one of those places. And he said that both of them are kind of essential. So once I'm done with this, I'm going to have to go read the other one, too. 7:48 Wes: Can you do a Cary Grant accent, by the way? 7:51 Erin: No, I won't do it publicly. I kind of got this impression. The scene where Diane Keaton and Woody Allen are on the roof, she had to have been doing an Irene Dunne impression. And I looked it up, and I guess in an interview she did say that she was doing an Irene Dunne impression during that. That whole thing. 8:13 Wes: Oh, I see. 8:14 Erin: I think it's very. She gets the cadence exactly right in that. 8:17 Wes: So interesting. 8:19 Erin: Yeah. Everything goes back to Irene Dunne and Cary Grant. What can I say? 8:24 Wes: They are the ur-romance. So I also watched Throne of Blood, which I thoroughly enjoyed, even though in the beginning I'm like, ugh, am I really gonna be. Just watch samurais. Am I really just gonna watch them yell at each other for two hours? So much yelling. But it's amazing. Wow. It's just such a mesmerizing. I mean, I guess a lot of it is in the visuals, you know. 8:47 Erin: Yeah, it is very. It's like you go into a Zen state when you watch it. 8:51 Wes: The Lady Macbeth character is so creepy. And because she's so. You know, she has a kind of very passive, on the surface demeanor, but her manipulativeness is, you know, so insidious. It makes more sense than overtly than Macbeth, than in Macbeth. She's trying to make him paranoid. Right. She's giving him plausible reasons to be, you know, get them before they get you kind of thing. So it's more nakedly about self preservation in a way that she's appealing to his idea that as he rises, the only way to preserve himself is to be ruthless, Something like that. Whereas in Macbeth, it doesn't quite make any sense, you know, this idea that there's an urgency to killing Duncan just because there's a prophecy. So. So there's a. There's a greater realism involved But I just find her so creepy in a way that it's quite gripping. 9:45 Erin: Yeah, she's really great in that. 9:47 Wes: And the same with the witch. 9:48 Erin: Yeah. Oh, so weird. Yeah, I like that little hut too. It's really. 9:54 Wes: What is it, a spindle? Yeah. And just the way the. The witch talks and the kind of sing songy. 10:00 Erin: Great film. 10:01 Wes: Yeah. Oh, and by the way, I watched something called Abigail's Party. Have you ever seen that? 10:05 Erin: No, I haven't. Never even heard of it. 10:08 Wes: This is a trip. It's basically a filmed play that was on BBC, but it was. It was a successful play in the 70s, I think. 77, same year as Annie Hall. I. I'm so predictable in my. My taste. It's all like late 60s, 70s, early 80s, and then everything else, I just can't. 10:25 Erin: Doesn't. 10:26 Wes: Doesn't do it for me as much, with some exceptions. But. But it's a. It's directed by Mike Leigh. 10:32 Erin: Oh, nice. 10:33 Wes: I think it was a. It was a play at the Hampstead Theater before they did a recording of it for BBC's Play for Today. I don't even know how to describe it. They call it a. It's Wikipedia. They describe it as a suburban situation comedy of manners and a satire on the aspirations and tastes of the new middle class that emerged in Britain in the 1970s. So Abigail is someone who actually doesn't. Never appears in the play, but the main character, Beverly Moss, is just out of this world. And I don't even know how to describe what she is exactly. You just have to see this. You know, it's like so darkly comic. There's not a lot of laugh out loud moments, but it's intense and you're sort of on your. On the edge of your seat. So anyway, yeah, you should. 11:19 Erin: Where. Where can I find it? I'm really interested in. 11:22 Wes: Well, unfortunately, it's not really. Well, actually. No. YouTube. YouTube. 11:27 Erin: YouTube. Okay. 11:28 Wes: It's free on YouTube. But otherwise, who's in it? 11:30 Erin: Is there anyone good in it? 11:31 Wes: Yeah. So it's. Alison Steadman plays Beverly. 11:35 Erin: Oh, no way. The Mrs. Bennet. 11:38 Wes: Yes. 11:39 Erin: Oh, my gosh. 11:40 Wes: Exactly. Right. Pride and Prejudice. Yeah, I forgot that Tim Stern plays Laurence. 11:45 Erin: I don't know. 11:46 Wes: Janine Duvitski, who didn't have much of a career. Yeah, I don't think many of these people had much of a career. Okay, I will watch it with you again. I would love to watch it again. So maybe we could watch it together. 11:55 Erin: Sure. 11:56 Wes: It is dark, so hopefully you won't hate me after we're done watching it, but. 12:00 Erin: No, that's okay. 12:01 Wes: What about you? What have you been? I know you. Well, we already talked about the fact that you're reading Great Expectation…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Love and Nostalgia in Woody Allen’s “Annie Hall” (1977) Feb 15, 2021
    Show notes

    Alvy Singer is not, he tells us, a depressive character. It’s just that as a child he always worried that the expanding universe would one day break apart; and as an adult that romantic relationships must always fall apart. With Annie Hall, he thought he had finally found something that would last, in part because she could — like the audiences of Woody Allen — endure and make sense of his fragmented neuroticism: by finding it, on occasion, funny, or endearing, or even informative. While Annie’s patient, quirky fatalism does not prevent her from outgrowing Alvy and leaving him behind, the nostalgic and wistful frame of Allen’s film does have something to say about what helps keep love alive, and people connected.

    This episode’s conversation continues on our after-show (post)script.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Yielding to Suggestion in Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” Feb 01, 2021
    Show notes

    On the moors of medieval Scotland, three witches hail the nobleman Macbeth as the future king—despite the fact that King Duncan is very much alive, and Macbeth is not in line to the throne. At the suggestion of power, Macbeth’s mind leaps to murder. Later, he fancies he sees a floating dagger leading him to Duncan, and after more bloodshed, believes he is haunted by the ghost of a friend. Is Macbeth merely a victim of divination, goaded by suggestion and his own imagination? To what extent is every ambition an imaginative act—and perhaps a form of prophecy? Wes & Erin give an analysis of the Scottish Play: Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy, “Macbeth.”

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Clever Hopes in W. H. Auden’s “September 1, 1939” Jan 18, 2021
    Show notes

    W. H. Auden hated this poem. He called it the most dishonest he had ever written, and eventually had it excluded from collections of his poetry. And yet it quickly became one of his most popular poems. And after the attacks of September 11, it was published in several national newspapers and widely discussed. This might seem to be a strange result, given that the poem is not a call-to-arms, but an invitation to self-critique. What explains the enduring appeal of Auden’s September 1, 1939? Was he right to repudiate it? Wes & Erin give their analysis.

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Thanks to Martin Köster for allowing us to use his painting New York at Night III for the cover art to this episode.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    The “Human Position” of Suffering in W. H. Auden’s “Musée des Beaux Arts” Jan 04, 2021
    Show notes

    As war loomed in Europe, the poet W.H. Auden left Britain for the United States. One of the poems he wrote just before leaving is about the nature of human suffering—or as Auden puts it, the “human position” of suffering: for the most part, it happens invisibly, and the procession of ordinary life leaves it unacknowledged. Yet, the representation and transcendence of suffering are tasks important both to religion and the arts. Is suffering’s “human position” something that can be redeemed? Wes and Erin analyze Auden’s poem Musée des Beaux Arts.

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Mutual Amusement in “The Awful Truth” (1937) Dec 21, 2020
    Show notes

    It’s a romance that begins with a divorce. Lucy and Jerry Warriner suspect each other of affairs, so they file suit, battle for custody of their dog, see other people, and generally go wild. Despite the spectre of infidelities— real or imagined— Lucy and Jerry learn a surprising truth: that the only person they enjoy “fooling around with” is their spouse. How are all relationships a kind of performance? And how might finding a mate mean finding not just a co-star, but one’s best audience? Wes and Erin analyze the 1937 classic comedy of remarriage, The Awful Truth.

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Against Specialization in Ibsen’s “Hedda Gabler” Dec 07, 2020
    Show notes

    Hedda Gabler is not a fan of specialization: not in the professor she has married, and his esoteric scholarly interests; not in domesticity, and the specialized affections required by marriage and motherhood; not in any lover’s infatuated specialization in her; and perhaps not in the form of specialization arguably required by life itself, with its finite and confining possibilities. Is there any way, short of suicide, to transcend such limits? Wes & Erin give an analysis of Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler.

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Kill Billy: Order and Innocence in Melville’s “Billy Budd” Nov 23, 2020
    Show notes

    Bill Budd is a beautiful man. Not just good looking, but exquisitely good natured, something that costs him no effort and has required no instruction. And yet it is ultimately his beautiful soul and good nature that get Billy killed. Wes & Erin analyze Herman Melville’s final and unfinished work of fiction, and whether a good heart and good intentions are more important than obedience to authority and adherence to civilized norms.

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Being Yourself in John Cassavetes’s “A Woman Under the Influence” (1974) Oct 26, 2020
    Show notes

    John Cassavetes is known today as the father of American independent film, a pioneering writer, director, editor, actor who managed to make movies on his own terms, and has since inspired two generations of filmmakers. In his own day, however, he couldn’t catch a break–unappreciated and unseen by most of the public, lambasted by critics. But what contemporaries didn’t understand about Cassavetes’s movies may actually be his message. What can he teach us about authenticity and the ways in which we confront and avoid our own emotions? Wes & Erin give an analysis of Cassavetes’s best-known film, 1974’s “A Woman Under the Influence.”

    Pre-order Erin’s forthcoming book “Avail” here: http://subtextpodcast.com/avail

    For bonus content, become a paid subscriber at Patreon or directly on the Apple Podcasts app. Patreon subscribers also get early access to ad-free regular episodes.

    Also from Wes: Curtain Times, a calendar of Boston theatre, classical, talks and readings.

    Follow:Twitter | Facebook | Website

    Thanks to Nick Ketter for the audio editing on this episode.


    Previous 1 14 15 16 17 18 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Fresh Air

    1

    Fresh Air Arts
    Twenty Thousand Hertz

    2

    Twenty Thousand Hertz Arts
    The Black Tapes

    3

    The Black Tapes Arts
    Snap Judgment

    4

    Snap Judgment Arts
    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin

    5

    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin Arts
    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc.

    6

    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc. Arts
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights