Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between.
https://linktr.ee/robinsonerhardt
php/*
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between.
https://linktr.ee/robinsonerhardt
Copyright: © Robinson Erhardt
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
This is the August 2024 AMA for Robinson’s Podcast. It is supported by the members of the Patreon. In this installment, Robinson answers questions about metaethics, art history, discipline, fashion, fitness, fantasy world-building, consciousness, fine-tuning, quantum mechanics, and more.
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
01:01 What to Do
07:43 Thoughts on Discipline
17:29 Art History
20:43 Philosophy for Daily Life
23:30 Planners and Pantsers
27:53 Favorite Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics?
33:06 Favorite Color?
35:57 On Magic and Fantasy World-Building
46:32 Black Holes, Electrons, and Thumbnails
52:45 Favorite Comedy
55:37 Physicality in Life
01:02:19 Is Consciousness Emergent or Fundamental?
01:04:54 Views on Fashion
01:15:16 What’s It Like to be a Philosopher?
01:24:00 Solutions of the Fine-Tuning Problem
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Joscha Bach is a computer scientist and artificial intelligence researcher currently working with Liquid AI. He has previously done research at Harvard, MIT, Intel, and the AI Foundation. In this episode, Joscha and Robinson discuss the nature of consciousness—both in humans and synthetic—various theories of consciousness like panpsychism, physicalism, dualism, and Roger Penrose’s, the distinction between intelligence and artificial intelligence, the next developments of ChatGPT and other LLMs, OpenAI, and whether advances in AI will spell the end of humankind.
Joscha’s X: https://x.com/Plinz
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
03:33 Why are Legos Like Computer Programs?
08:23 Philosophy and Mental Representation
11:17 Using Computer Science to Understand Reality
16:26 Could We Make Minds from Machines?
19:14 Is Reality a Simulation?
21:46 What Is the Mind?
24:27 What Do Mysterions Believe About Consciousness?
26:20 Does Roger Penrose’s Theory of Consciousness Make Sense?
35:15 Could Dualism Explain the Human Mind?
37:58 What Is Physicalism About the Human Mind?
41:03 What’s Wrong with Panpsychism?
47:58 On the Next Breakthrough in Consciousness
52:59 What Is Intelligence?
55:45 What’s Artificial Intelligence?
58:22 What Defines the Current Wave of AI?
01:00:57 On the First AI Winter
01:04:55 On Meaning, LLMs, and ChatGPT
01:08:18 Does ChatGPT Mirror the Human Mind?
01:13:18 Is ChatGPT Intelligent?
01:18:43 Will ChatGPT Become Smarter than Humans?
01:24:25 What Is the ARC Challenge for AI?
01:27:58 Will ChatGPT Philosophize Better than Philosophers?
01:35:04 Are Apple, Google, and Microsoft on the Cutting Edge of AI?
01:39:16 Shoulder We Fear AI?
01:45:34 Are We the Smartest Thing on Earth?
01:49:47 What’s More Dangerous: The Internet or AI?
01:54:20 Could AI Take Over the Planet?
01:59:22 Will AI Make Human Artists Obsolete?
02:04:10 Will AI Make Humankind Dependent on the One Percent?
02:11:28 Could AI Solve Climate Change?
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-betwee
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Norman Finkelstein received his PhD from the Princeton University Politics Department, and is best known for his research on Israel and Palestine. In this episode of Robinson’s Podcast, Norman addresses some of the most common arguments made in defense of Israel, such as those purporting to show Israel is not committing genocide, that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, that Israel is fighting in self-defense, that Egypt is responsible for the crisis, and more. Norman also appeared on episode 192, where he and Robinson discussed October 7th, allegations of genocide and apartheid, and connections between the war and the Holocaust. Norman’s most recent book is I’ll Burn That Bridge When I Get to It! Heretical Thoughts on Identity Politics, Cancel Culture, and Academic Freedom (Sublation Media, 2023).
Norman’s Website: https://www.normanfinkelstein.com
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
03:47 Will Israel Nuke Palestine?
12:07 On Palestine and the Holocaust
15:10 Is Israel Getting Away with Genocide?
20:35 On Nuclear War and Israel’s Dependence on the United States
24:00 How Responsible Is Egypt for the Crisis in Gaza?
27:43 Does the Israeli Military Target Civilians?
36:27 Why Norman Finkelstein Can’t Watch the News from Palestine
38:06 On Hoaxes and Conspiracies in Israel-Palestine
47:06 On Corruption in Academia
49:16 Propaganda in Holocaust Scholarship
53:00 Facts and Fiction in Israel-Palestine
1:00:27 Norman Finkelstein’s Research Habits
1:05:10 Do Israeli Settlements Break International Law?
1:07:44 Why Does the United States Support Israel?
1:12:21 “Jewish Supremacy” Versus Harvard
1:20:11 Does Anti-Zionism = Anti-Semitism?
1:29:38 Does Anti-Semitism Cause Protests Against Israel?
1:35:44 Is The War in Gaza Justifiable as Self-Defense?
1:42:39 On Becoming a Public Figure
1:50:51 On His War with Alan Dershowitz
2:04:19 On Integrity and Palestine Scholarship
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Leonard Susskind is Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. Among other accomplishments, he is among the fathers of such revolutionary concepts in physics as string theory, black hole complementarity, the holographic principle, and the string-theoretic landscape. It is this last concept that Robinson and Leonard discuss in this episode. More particularly, they address the fine-tuning problem—that so many of the constants in physics, such as the cosmological constant—appear to have been selected precisely to allow for human life, as if they were substantially different we would not exist. In answering this question they talk about string theory, dark energy, the Higgs boson, god and supernatural explanations, eternal inflation, the multiverse, the interpretations of quantum mechanics, the anthropic principle, alternative answers to the problem, and the future of research in the area. For more detail, read Leonard’s book on the topic, The Cosmic Landscape.
The Cosmic Landscape: https://a.co/d/j2njH7h
The Theoretical Minimum: https://theoreticalminimum.com
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
04:03 A Parable About the Fine-Tuning Problem
09:58 String Theory and the Fine-Tuning Problem
18:04 The Problem of Dark Energy
25:05 Could Dark Energy Rip the Universe Apart?
33:11 God, String Theory, and the Illusion of Intelligent Design
42:51 On the String-Theoretic Landscape
48:54 The Eternal Inflation of the Universe
55:07 What Determines the Physics of the Multiverse?
01:02:09 On the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
01:05:50 On the Future of String Theory and Fine-Tuning
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Raphael Bousso is the Chancellor’s Chair in Physics at the Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, where he leads the Bousso Group in research on quantum gravity and quantum information. He is a renowned string theorist famous also for his development of the string theoretic landscape and the Bousso bound in holography. In this episode, Robinson and Raphael discuss the groundbreaking work of Jacob Bekenstein, Stephen Hawking, Leonard Susskind, Gerard ’t Hooft, and others on the black hole information paradox. They then turn to how this led to the formulation of the holographic principle, which has had profound implications for research on quantum gravity, especially for Raphael himself, who has recently been working on quantum information theory, quantum communication, and other ways in which classical gravity “knows about” and encodes its own quantum states.
The Bousso Group: https://lightsheet.berkeley.edu
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
04:14 Working with Leonard Susskind and Stephen Hawking
6:29 Why Do Physicists Care About Black Holes?
19:11 Do Black Holes have a Temperature?
23:51 How Cold is a Black Hole?
27:32 The Black Hole Information Paradox
41:31 Do Black Holes Mean Quantum Mechanics Must be Thrown Out?
47:09 Black Hole Complementarity and Holography
54:09 What Is Quantum Gravity?
01:01:15 Why is Quantum Gravity a Low Energy Problem?
01:06:54 The Bottom-Up Approach to Quantum Gravity
1:11:12 On String Theory and Holography
01:16:00 What Are Bousso Bounds?
01:22:58 Is Gravity a Quantum Error-Correcting Code?
01:32:09 Is Gravity a Fundamental Force?
01:37:25 On String Theory and the Multiverse
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Dr. Anna Lembke received her undergraduate degree in Humanities from Yale University and her medical degree from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Medical Director of Addiction Medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine. She is also Program Director of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Fellowship, and Chief of the Stanford Addiction Medicine Dual Diagnosis Clinic. This is Anna’s second time on the show. On episode 117, she and Robinson discussed her latest, New York Times bestselling book, Dopamine Nation (Dutton/Penguin Random House, August 2021). In this episode, they discuss psychiatry and some of its philosophical connections. Some of the topics they cover include psychiatric phenomenology, eating disorders, the patient-psychiatrist relationship, therapeutic modalities, moral realism, the goals of therapy, and the upcoming Official Dopamine Nation Workbook.
Dopamine Nation: https://a.co/d/0AJw6Je
The Official Dopamine Nation Workbook: https://a.co/d/0eVHKFc1
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
03:01 Meta-Commentary, Telehealth, and In-Person Psychiatry
13:50 Transference in Therapy
23:01 Moral Realism
33:45 Nietzsche and Veganism
42:43 Reductionism, Emotion, and Psychiatry
45:55 On Treating Eating Disorders
52:24 The DSM-V and Psychiatric Practice
01:00:00 The Relationship Between Science and Psychiatry
01:08:31 Robinson’s Speech Patterns
01:15:40 Medication Versus Therapy
01:23:07 Creative Pursuits and Therapy
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
This is the inaugural AMA for Robinson’s Podcast. It is supported by the members of the podcast’s Patreon. In this installment, Robinson answers questions about the reality of mathematics, podcasting, moral facts, ice cream, the nature of time, literary books for neophytes, and more.
Denying Infinity: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2024.2344346
Abstract: Abraham Robinson is well-known as the inventor of nonstandard analysis, which uses nonstandard models to give the notions of infinitesimal and infinitely large magnitudes a precise interpretation. Less discussed, although subtle and original—if ultimately flawed—is Robinson’s work in the philosophy of mathematics. The foundational position he inherited from David Hilbert undermines not only the use of nonstandard analysis, but also Robinson’s considerable corpus of pre-logic contributions to the field in such diverse areas as differential equations and aeronautics. This tension emerges from Robinson’s disbelief in the existence of infinite totalities (any mention of them is ‘literally meaningless’) and the fact that much of his work involves them. I argue that he treats infinitary avenues of mathematics as useful tools to avoid this difficulty, but that this is not successful to the extent that these tools must be justified by a conservative extension from finitary mathematics. While Robinson provides a compelling and unorthodox pragmatic justification for the role of formal systems in mathematical practice despite their apparent infinitary presuppositions, he deflates mainstream mathematics to a collection of games that occasionally produces meaningful results. This amounts to giving up on a commitment to reconciling his finitism with his mathematical practice.
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Joyce Carol Oates is the Rogers S. Berlind ’52 Professor Emerita in the Humanities at Princeton University with the Program in Creative Writing. She is among the most widely-recognized and respected writers of our time, and has written in a wide variety of media and genres, from poetry and fiction in the former category to horror and Gothic in the latter. Her work has also been adapted into various other media, from plays to film. Joyce is the recipient of two O. Henry Awards and the National Book Award, among many others. This is Joyce’s second appearance on Robinson’s Podcast. In episode 137, she and Robinson discussed craft in fiction and poetry. In this episode, they talk about Joyce’s most recent collection of short stories, Zero-Sum (link in the description), as well as philosophy, Peter Singer, dealing with criticism, translation, and more.
Joyce’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/JoyceCarolOates
Joyce’s Substack: https://joycecaroloates.substack.com
Zero-Sum: https://a.co/d/0cYh3ndo
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
03:16 On Peter Singer
12:41 On Buddhism
21:50 On Hemingway
25:50 Dealing with Criticism
38:17 On Translation
47:53 Writing Short Stories
58:38 Imagery and Recreating the World
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Slavoj Žižek is international director of the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities at the University of London, visiting professor at New York University, and a senior researcher at the University of Ljubljana’s Department of Philosophy. This is Slavoj’s fourth appearance on the show. On episode 109, he and Robinson discussed wokeness and psychoanalysis. On episode 118, he, Sean Carroll, and Robinson discussed quantum physics, the multiverse, and time travel. And on episode 206 he, Lee Smolin, and Robinson discussed quantum physics. In this episode, Robinson and Slavoj talk about ancient philosophy, god, communism, quantum mechanics, and psychoanalysis.
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
02:47 Why Is Philosophy More important Now Than Ever?
11:08 On Socrates and the Importance of Philosophy
19:12 On Excrement, God, and Atheism
27:50 A Communist Paradise
34:18 Ukraine and Marxism
39:24 Philosophy and Quantum Mechanics
47:56 Is Lying the Point of Language?
55:49 Cursing as a Test for Artificial Intelligence
58:25 On Philosophers and Physicists
1:01:50 On Superpositions and Quantum Mechanics
1:09:28 On Analytic and Continental Philosophy
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.
Patreon: https://bit.ly/3v8OhY7
Deborah Gordon is Professor of Biology at Stanford University. She is a myrmecologist—an entomologist who studies ants—focusing on how complex behavior emerges from ant colonies, which have no central control. In this episode, Deborah and Robinson discuss some of the distinctive features of ants, how pheromones help to determine their behavior, examples of fascinating ant species, collective ant behavior, and the life cycle of an ant colony. For more of Deborah’s work on collective behavior, check out her book The Ecology of Collective Behavior (Princeton, 2023).
The Gordon Lab: https://web.stanford.edu/~dmgordon/
Ants at Work: https://a.co/d/7bpokYU
The Ecology of Collective Behavior: https://a.co/d/1bBT1h7
OUTLINE
00:00 Introduction
02:33 Ants and Embryology
05:29 General Features of Ants
13:14 Some Fascinating Ant Species
28:20 Pheromones and Ant Behavior
38:17 Ant Slavery
41:30 Collective Ant Behavior
47:04 A Colony’s Life Cycle
59:01 Revisiting Embryology
Robinson’s Website: http://robinsonerhardt.com
Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, and everyone in-between.