TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Proof Over Precedent – Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School

    The Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School discusses the work of bringing credible evidence to lawyers, judges, and decision makers, to transform the U.S. justice system into an evidence-based field. We bring you weekly one-on-one interviews with experts in the area of access to justice — researchers, lawyers, professors, law students, data analysts, research participants, and anyone who has an interesting role in this growing area.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2025

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 33: Are Federal Regulations Protecting Prisoners or Paralyzing Research? Jan 27, 2026
    Show notes

    This episode of "Proof Over Precedent" brings together IRB Director Shannon Sewards and A2J Lab Faculty Director and podcast host Jim Greiner to talk about the complexity of ethical research involving incarcerated individuals and the balance between maintaining those ethical standards and advancing social and behavioral research. The discussion also delves into the differences between protections for biomedical research and those for behavioral research.


    Episode 32: Arbitration vs. Litigation -- Who Benefits? Jan 19, 2026
    Show notes

    When it comes to consumer protection, signing off on the fine print may equate to signing off certain legal rights and agreeing not to sue a company in court but rather to use arbitration. Does the process actually matter? Several studies find variances in consumer financial relief and win rates, along with potential incentives in mandatory arbitration that could discredit the integrity of the process. The latest "Proof Over Precedent" episode calls for new research to address the shortcomings of existing studies and to provide definitive findings on mandatory arbitration's impact on consumers.


    Episode 31: Life Without Parole—a Death Sentence in Disguise Jan 12, 2026
    Show notes

    In this "Student Voices" episode, HLS J.D. candidate Kristen Arnold looks at the procedural shortcomings of life sentences without the possibility of parole, particularly in comparison to capital punishment cases. She dives into the injustices of the LWOP procedure, the no-hope consequences for inmates and the system, and opportunity for a randomized control trial in the field to improve fairness.


    Episode 30: Do Judges Actually Read Search Warrants? Jan 06, 2026
    Show notes

    Despite search warrants being a topic of significant interest in court cases and legal scholarship, the process of obtaining warrants offers comparatively little information. But when researchers found a surprising public data point in this field, their analysis led to sobering findings regarding the time judges spend reviewing warrants and the high approval rates of such warrants. In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the researchers discuss their work, the data analysis process, and the implications of potentially insufficient judicial review of warrants.


    Episode 28: Pretrial Detention Efficacy and Alternatives Dec 22, 2025
    Show notes

    This Student Voices episode focuses on the data and studies pointing to the shortcomings of pretrial detention – the significant costs, lack of impact on reducing crime, and shortage of failure-to-appear connections. HLS JD candidate Leann Poarch instead suggests a low-cost, relatively low-tech alternative that may be more effective.


    Episode 27: The Hidden Costs of Pretrial Detention Dec 16, 2025
    Show notes

    In this Student Voices episode, HLS J.D. candidate Leann Poarch discusses the significant costs of detaining individuals who await trial, such as legal fees, loss of employment, and long-term economic and psychological effects. Given that detaining individuals not yet convicted can cost local governments more than $13 billion, is it time to look into reforming the pretrial system?


    Episode 26: When is Informed Consent Unnecessary? Dec 09, 2025
    Show notes Cartoon depicting a soccer player being told by a ref to start using hands in the game.Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    In this episode of Proof Over Precedent, the fourth in a series on Ethics in the Law, host Jim Greiner talks again with IRB expert Shannon Sewards to discuss the complexities and criteria involved in obtaining waivers of informed consent within the realm of social science and legal research, comparing it to the regulations governing medical research. The two dive into an A2J Lab study on pretrial risk assessment tools to use as an example in determining the necessity of obtaining informed consent. When does protecting study participants take precedence, and when do critical research needs supersede those of participants?

    Read the corresponding blog post.

    Speakers:

    • Shannon Sewards, Director of the Human Research Protection Program, Dartmouth Health; former Director, Harvard University Area IRB
    • Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School

    Resources mentioned:

    • General Requirements for Informed Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116)
    • General Waiver or Alteration of Consent (45 C.F.R § 46.116(f)
    • Office of Human Research Protection
    • Common Rule (45 C.F.R § 46(a)

    Related “Ethics in the Law” series episodes:

    • Episode 8: Ethics in Research — IRBs and the Common Rule Explained
    • Episode 10: What is Human Subjects Research in Law?
    • Episode 14: Ethical Conundrums in Legal Research

    Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

    Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

    • Email newsletter
    • Facebook
    • BlueSky
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube

    Support the A2J

    Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal


    Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes Dec 02, 2025
    Show notes Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorceImage by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    Why is it so hard logistically to file for divorce when legally some cases are quite simple and uncomplicated? This second divorce study episode of Proof Over Precedent dives into the data behind the hassle factors and shares the surprising results of measuring the pro se accessibility of a court system. Maybe the answer isn’t more lawyers.

    Listen to Episode 24: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes

    Read the corresponding blog post.

    Speakers:

    • Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School
    • Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan
    • Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google

    Resources mentioned:

    • “Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN
    • “Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS
    • “Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure
    • Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules


    Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

    Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

    • Email newsletter
    • Facebook
    • BlueSky
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube

    Support the A2J Lab

    Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal


    Episode 24: Till Death—or an Affordable Divorce—Do Us Part Dec 02, 2025
    Show notes Cartoon depicting an outdated mandate requiring a typewriter in order to file for divorceImage by Felicia Quan, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    When it comes to obtaining a divorce, pro se litigants face significant obstacles, stemming primarily from financial challenges. Without a lawyer, many are ill equipped to undertake the complex paperwork, waiting periods, and logistical hurdles that come with filing for divorce. This first of two divorce study episodes of Proof Over Precedent introduces the randomized controlled trial the A2J Lab undertook to determine how effective pro bono matching services are in providing access to justice for low-income individuals.

    Listen to Episode 25: Legal Labyrinths Reveal Divorce Filing Woes

    Read the corresponding blog post.

    Speakers:

    • Jim Greiner, Honorable S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School; Faculty Director of the Access to Justice Lab at Harvard Law School
    • Roseanna Sommers, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan
    • Tom Ferriss, data scientist, Google

    Resources mentioned:

    • “Trapped in Marriage”, SSRN
    • “Using random assignment to measure court accessibility for low-income divorce seekers”, PNAS
    • “Divorce in Philadelphia County” brochure
    • Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Family Division Local Rules


    Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

    Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

    • Email newsletter
    • Facebook
    • BlueSky
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube

    Support the A2J Lab

    Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal


    Episode 23: Innovative Approaches to Mental Health Hearings Nov 18, 2025
    Show notes Cartoon depicting a judge deferring to a mental health professional.Image by Courtney Chrystal, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    Rogers hearings allow Massachusetts judges to approve treatment plans for involuntarily committed individuals, but the process is criticized for its inefficiency and 99% approval rate. What if procedural reforms could improve outcomes? Replacing district court judges with administrative law judges to oversee hearings and substituting public defenders with mental health professionals as patient advocates could improve outcomes for both the involuntarily committed individuals and the courts—reducing delays, improving patient outcomes, and better utilizing court resources, according to HLS student Aarushi Solanki. She outlines the need for a randomized controlled trial to bring evidence to this proposal.

    Read the corresponding blog post.

    Speakers:

    • Aarushi Solanki, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School
    • Joe Liberman, J.D. candidate, Harvard Law School

    Resources mentioned:

    • Rogers hearing
    • Gagnon v. Scarpelli
    • Vitek v. Jones

    Share feedback and relevant topics you would like the A2J Lab to discuss: a2jlab@law.harvard.edu

    Stay connected with the Access to Justice Lab:

    • Email newsletter
    • Facebook
    • BlueSky
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube

    Support the A2J Lab

    Proof Over Precedent cover art by Courtney Chrystal


    Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights