TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Technology

    LessWrong posts by zvi

    Audio narrations of LessWrong posts by zvi

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2024 All rights reserved

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    “Anthropic Officially, Arbitrarily and Capriciously Designated a Supply Chain Risk” by Zvi Mar 06, 2026
    Show notes

    Make no mistake about what is happening.

    The Department of War (DoW) demanded Anthropic bend the knee, and give them ‘unfettered access’ to Claude, without understanding what that even meant. If they didn’t get what they want, they threatened to both use the Defense Production Act (DPA) to make Anthropic give the military this vital product, and also designate the company a supply chain risk (SCR).

    Hegseth sent out an absurdly broad SCR announcement on Twitter that had absolutely no legal basis, that if implemented as written would have been corporate murder. They have now issued an official notification, which is still illegal, arbitrary and capricious, but is scoped narrowly and won’t be too disruptive.

    Nominally the SCR designation is because we cannot rely on that same product when the company has not bent the knee and might object to some uses of its private property that it never agreed to allow.

    No one actually believes this. No one is pretending others should believe this. If they have real concerns, there are numerous less restrictive and less disruptive tools available to the Department of War. Many have the bonus of being legal.

    In actuality [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (05:01) Post Overview

    (07:26) Anthropics Statement on the SCR

    (11:24) What The Actual SCR Designation Says

    (14:40) Enemies of The Republic

    (29:43) Regulation Need Not Seize The Means Of Production

    (31:53) Microsoft Stands Firm

    (33:03) Calling This What It Is

    (34:22) What To Expect Next

    ---

    First published:
    March 6th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EL8uxnWMEZXc7Wh9A/anthropic-officially-arbitrarily-and-capriciously-designated

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    florence tweets:

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “AI #158: The Department of War” by Zvi Mar 05, 2026
    Show notes

    This was the worst week I have had in quite a while, maybe ever.

    The situation between Anthropic and the Department of War (DoW) spun completely out of control. Trump tried to de-escalate by putting out a Truth merely banning Anthropic from direct use by the Federal Government with a six month wind down. Then Secretary of War Hegseth went rogue and declared Anthropic a supply chain risk, with wording indicating an intent to outright murder Anthropic as a company.

    Then that evening OpenAI signed a contact with DoW,

    I’ve been trying to figure out the situation and help as best I can. I’ve been in a lot of phone calls, often off the record. Conduct is highly unbecoming and often illegal, arbitrary and capricious. The house is on fire, the Republic in peril. I have people lying to me and being lied to by others. There is fog of war. One gets it from all sides. It's terrifying to think about what might happen with one wrong move.

    Also the Middle East is kind of literally on fire, which I’m not covering.

    Last week, I had previously covered the situation in Anthropic and [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (04:17) A Well Deserved Break

    (05:53) Huh, Upgrades

    (07:40) On Your Marks

    (07:59) Choose Your Fighter

    (08:55) Deepfaketown and Botpocalypse Soon

    (10:07) A Young Ladys Illustrated Primer

    (11:48) You Drive Me Crazy

    (12:34) They Took Our Jobs

    (12:50) The Art of the Jailbreak

    (13:27) Introducing

    (14:04) In Other AI News

    (15:29) Show Me the Money

    (16:51) Quiet Speculations

    (17:39) The Quest for Sane Regulations

    (19:25) Chip City

    (20:26) The Week in Audio

    (20:39) Government Rhetorical Innovation

    (22:53) Give The People What They Want

    (24:28) Rhetorical Innovation

    (34:23) We Go Our Separate Ways

    (35:21) Thanks For The Memos

    (48:10) Take A Moment

    (48:37) Designating Anthropic A Supply Chain Risk Wont Legally Work

    (50:18) The Buck Stops Here

    (57:23) Sane Talk About the Department of War Situation

    (01:06:18) I Declare Defense Production Act

    (01:09:49) Greg Allen Illustrates The Situation

    (01:18:33) Do Not Lend Your Strength To That Which You Wish To Be Free From

    (01:23:56) Oh Right Democrats Exist

    (01:24:46) Beware

    (01:26:16) Endorsements of Anthropic Holding the Moral Line

    (01:29:08) The Week The World Learned About Claude

    (01:30:42) Other Reflections on the Department of War Situation

    (01:31:45) Aligning a Smarter Than Human Intelligence is Difficult

    (01:32:30) The Lighter Side

    ---

    First published:
    March 5th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YTnzcZSbA69fMCjNo/ai-158-the-department-of-war

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    A bar graph titled Senator Jim Banks with quote about AI as defining 21st century technology and capability amplification.Katherine Boyle tweets: nic carter tweets: florence tweets: Reader-added context note about Sam Altman's contradictory statements on military technology use.Line graph showing Daniel Eth (yes, Eth is my actual last name) tweets: Holly Elmore tweets: Edward Grefenstette tweets: Chat interface showing Claude's response about ChatGPT and persistence thought process.Chat conversation showing a question about cheating, a denial response, and revealing thought process below.Dean W. Ball tweets: Tom Blomfield tweets: Gwdihŵ 🦉 tweets: Emoji showing person with hand covering face, appearing distressed.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “Gemini 3.1 Pro Aces Benchmarks, I Suppose” by Zvi Mar 04, 2026
    Show notes

    I’ve been trying to find a slot for this one for a while. I am thrilled that today had sufficiently little news that I am comfortable posting this.

    Gemini 3.1 scores very well on benchmarks, but most of us had the same reaction after briefly trying it: “It's a Gemini model.”

    And that was that, given our alternatives. But it's got its charms.

    Consider this a nice little, highly skippable break.

    The Pitch

    It's a good model, sir. That's the pitch.

    Sundar Pichai (CEO Google): Gemini 3.1 Pro is here. Hitting 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2, it's a step forward in core reasoning (more than 2x 3 Pro).

    With a more capable baseline, it's great for super complex tasks like visualizing difficult concepts, synthesizing data into a single view, or bringing creative projects to life.

    We’re shipping 3.1 Pro across our consumer and developer products to bring this underlying leap in intelligence to your everyday applications right away.

    Jeff Dean also highlighted ARC-AGI-2 along with some cool animations, an urban planning sim, some heat transfer analysis and the general benchmarks.

    On Your Marks

    Google presents a good standard set of [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (00:37) The Pitch

    (01:31) On Your Marks

    (04:34) Other Peoples Benchmarks

    (06:54) Gemini 3 DeepThink V2

    (12:33) Positive Feedback

    (17:22) Negative Feedback

    (19:07) Try Gemini Lite

    ---

    First published:
    March 4th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/82zizPyyPgaEswbxz/gemini-3-1-pro-aces-benchmarks-i-suppose

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Benchmark comparison table showing performance scores across AI models for various technical tasks.Leaderboard graph showing Bar chart titled Leaderboard showing Gemini 3.1 Pro leading APEX-Agents benchmark at 33.5% score.Benchmark comparison table showing AI model performance across eight different tests and categories.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “A Tale of Three Contracts” by Zvi Mar 03, 2026
    Show notes

    “Secretary of War Tweets That Anthropic is Now a Supply Chain Risk” by Zvi Mar 02, 2026
    Show notes

    This is the long version of what happened so far. I will strive for shorter ones later, when I have the time to write them.

    Most of you should read the first two sections, then choose the remaining sections that are relevant to your interests.

    But first, seriously, read Dean Ball's post Clawed. Do that first. I will not quote too extensively from it, because I am telling all of you to read it. Now. You’re not allowed to keep reading this or anything else until after you do. I’m not kidding.

    That's out of the way? Good. Let's get started.

    What Happened

    President Trump enacted a perfectly reasonable solution to the situation with Anthropic and the Department of War. He cancelled the Anthropic contract with a six month wind down period, after which the Federal Government would be told not to use Anthropic software.

    Everyone thought the worst was now over. The situation was unfortunate for Anthropic and also for national security, but this gave us six months to transition, it gave us six months to negotiate another solution, and it avoided any of the extreme highly damaging options that Secretary of [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (00:49) What Happened

    (10:02) The Timeline Of Events

    (21:39) I Did Not Have Time To Write You A Short One

    (22:40) The Unhinged Declaration of the Secretary of War

    (25:08) Altman Has Been Excellent On The Question of Supply Chain Risk, But May Need To Do More

    (27:35) Arrogance Here Means Insisting On Meaningful Red Lines On Mass Domestic Surveillance and Lethal Autonomous Weapons

    (29:35) Not Doing Business Is Totally Fine

    (30:22) The Demand For Unrestricted Access Is New And Is Selective And Fake

    (32:47) Claims Of Strongarming Are Ad Hominem Bad Faith Obvious Nonsense

    (34:55) Hegseth Equates Not Being a Dictator With Companies Having Veto Power Over Operational Military Decisions

    (40:54) The Part That If Enacted Would Be A Historically Epic Clusterfuck

    (48:54) The Other Part Of The Clusterfuck

    (52:49) The Department of War Had Many Excellent Options

    (55:53) And Then Theres Emil Michael

    (01:02:42) Anthropic Will Probably Survive

    (01:05:14) The Goal of DoW Was Largely Mass Domestic Surveillance

    (01:15:32) What Are The Key Differences Between The Two Contracts?

    (01:22:54) OpenAIs Contract Terms

    (01:27:04) What OpenAIs Contract Terms Actually Do

    (01:29:16) OpenAI Is Trusting DoW And Sam Altman Misrepresented This

    (01:33:13) OpenAI Accepted Terms Anthropic Explicitly Declined And That Would Not Have Protected Anthropics Red Lines

    (01:35:26) How Altman Initially Described His Deal

    (01:42:26) OpenAI Allowed All Lawful Use And Trusts DoW On This

    (01:47:21) The DoW Could Alter This Deal

    (01:49:29) Why OpenAIs Shared Legal Language Offers Almost No Protections

    (01:59:11) So How Does OpenAI Hope For This To Work Out?

    (02:01:56) This Was Never About Money

    (02:05:03) OpenAI Tells Us How They Really Feel

    (02:06:45) First The Good News

    (02:11:40) The OpenAI Redlines Only Forbid Currently Illegal Activity

    (02:16:28) Altman Does Not Present As Understanding The Difference In Redlines

    (02:18:46) Meeting Of The Minds

    (02:21:21) Anthropics Position Was The Opposite Of How This Is Portrayed

    (02:21:56) The Room Where It Happened

    (02:25:45) You Dont Have The Right

    (02:32:25) I Ask Questions And Get Answers

    (02:37:05) Does This Contract Apply To NSA?

    (02:38:07) Can OpenAI Models Be Used To Analyze Commercially Available Data At Scale?

    (02:48:21) Employee Activism

    ---

    First published:
    March 2nd, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Wpdivf3iNJDzBcbzJ/secretary-of-war-tweets-that-anthropic-is-now-a-supply-chain

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    News article screenshot. The headline reads: Dean W. Ball tweets: David Sacks reposted a tweet by Under Secretary of War Emil Mi... that tweets: Text excerpt about Pentagon's responsibility regarding US laws and Anthropic's usage policy.News article screenshot. The headline reads: News article screenshot. The headline reads: News article screenshot. The headline reads: A military arm of the intelligence community buys commercially available databases containing location data from smartphone apps and searches it for Americans' past movements without a warrant, according to an unclassified memo obtained by The New York Times.Text document excerpt discussing DoD components' acquisition and use of publicly available information for national security missions, citing Carpenter v. United States.Question and answer about Department of Defense analyzing commercial data.ChatGPT conversation screenshot discussing whether the Department of Defense analyzes commercially available data at scale.The question Chalk writing on pavement reading Person drawing with chalk on sidewalk near parked work trucks.Chalk writing on pavement reading Sidewalk chalk writing reading Nighttime pedestrian plaza with chalk writing about AI assistance and autonomous weapons.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “Anthropic and the DoW: Anthropic Responds” by Zvi Feb 27, 2026
    Show notes

    The Department of War gave Anthropic until 5:01pm on Friday the 27th to either give the Pentagon ‘unfettered access’ to Claude for ‘all lawful uses,’ or else. With the ‘or else’ being not the sensible ‘okay we will cancel the contract then’ but also expanding to either being designated a supply chain risk or having the government invoke the Defense Production Act.

    It is perfectly legitimate for the Department of War to decide that it does not wish to continue on Anthropic's terms, and that it will terminate the contract. There is no reason things need be taken further than that.

    Undersecretary of State Jeremy Lewin: This isn’t about Anthropic or the specific conditions at issue. It's about the broader premise that technology deeply embedded in our military must be under the exclusive control of our duly elected/appointed leaders. No private company can dictate normative terms of use—which can change and are subject to interpretation—for our most sensitive national security systems. The @DeptofWar obviously can’t trust a system a private company can switch off at any moment.

    Timothy B. Lee: OK, so don’t renew their contract. Why are you threatening to go nuclear by declaring them [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (08:00) Good News: We Can Keep Talking

    (10:31) Once Again No You Do Not Need To Call Dario For Permission

    (15:22) The Pentagon Reiterates Its Demands And Threats

    (16:48) The Pentagons Dual Threats Are Contradictory and Incoherent

    (18:27) The Pentagons Position Has Unfortunate Implications

    (20:25) OpenAI Stands With Anthropic

    (22:48) xAI Stands On Unreliable Ground

    (25:25) Replacing Anthropic Would At Least Take Months

    (26:02) We Will Not Be Divided

    (27:50) This Risks Driving Other Companies Away

    (30:32) Other Reasons For Concern

    (32:10) Wisdom From A Retired General

    (35:06) Congress Urges Restraint

    (37:05) Reaction Is Overwhelmingly With Anthropic On This

    (40:52) Some Even More Highly Unhelpful Rhetoric

    (47:23) Other Summaries and Notes

    (48:32) Paths Forward

    ---

    First published:
    February 27th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ppj7v4sSCbJjLye3D/anthropic-and-the-dow-anthropic-responds

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Under Secretary of War Emil Michael tweets: Under Secretary of War Emil Michael tweets: Under Secretary of War Emil Michael tweets: Sen. Elissa Slotkin tweets:

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “AI #157: Burn the Boats” by Zvi Feb 26, 2026
    Show notes

    Events continue to be fast and furious.

    This was the first actually stressful week of the year.

    That was mostly due to issues around Anthropic and the Department of War. This is the big event the news is not picking up, with the Pentagon on the verge of invoking one of two extreme options that would both be extremely damaging to national security and that would potentially endanger our Republic. The post has details, and the first section here has a few additional notes.

    Also stressful for many was the impact of Citrini's AI scenario, where it is 2028 and AI agents are sufficiently capable to disrupt the whole economy but this turns out to be bearish for stocks. People freaked out enough about this that it seems to have directly impacted the stock market, although most stocks other than the credit card companies seem to have bounced back. Of course, in a scenario like that we probably all die and definitely the world transforms, and you have bigger things to worry about than the stock market, but the post does raise a lot of very good detailed points, so I spend my post going over [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (02:34) Anthropic and the Department of War

    (06:06) Language Models Offer Mundane Utility

    (06:39) Language Models Dont Offer Mundane Utility

    (08:23) Huh, Upgrades

    (08:43) On Your Marks

    (15:22) Choose Your Fighter

    (15:32) Deepfaketown and Botpocalypse Soon

    (16:58) Head In The Sand

    (17:58) Fun With Media Generation

    (19:19) A Young Ladys Illustrated Primer

    (19:46) You Drive Me Crazy

    (20:43) They Took Our Jobs

    (25:42) The Art of the Jailbreak

    (26:43) Get Involved

    (28:02) Introducing

    (31:49) In Other AI News

    (36:10) The India Summit

    (46:01) Show Me the Money

    (48:07) Quiet Speculations

    (49:25) The Quest for Sane Regulations

    (54:59) Chip City

    (56:11) The Mask Comes Off

    (58:19) The Week in Audio

    (01:07:27) Quickly, Theres No Time

    (01:07:59) Dean Ball On Recursive Self-Improvement

    (01:13:28) Rhetorical Innovation

    (01:18:23) Aligning a Smarter Than Human Intelligence is Difficult

    (01:20:23) The Homework Assignment Is To Choose The Assignment

    (01:35:34) Agent Foundations

    (01:36:54) Autonomous Killer Robots

    (01:37:36) People Really Hate AI

    (01:39:50) People Are Worried About AI Killing Everyone

    (01:42:00) Other People Are Not As Worried About AI Killing Everyone

    (01:42:59) The Lighter Side

    (01:47:24) If I streamed Slay the Spire 2, would you watch?

    ---

    First published:
    February 26th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/zC3Rtrj6RXwEde9h6/ai-157-burn-the-boats

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Graph showing task length at 50% success rate for AI models over time, with trend lines.Graph showing time to train AI models from 2019 to 2026, with exponential growth curve.Blurred laptop computer on desk with hands typing.Daniel Eth (yes, Eth is my actual last name) tweets: Dot chart showing global AI interaction levels by user type, February 2026.A line graph showing projected annualized revenue for OpenAI and Anthropic through 2027.Stock price chart for International Business Machines showing sharp decline to 230.53 USD.Satirical recruitment poster for fictional organization Palantir with threatening message about political candidates.Daniel Eth (yes, Eth is my actual last name) tweets: Pie chart showing land use distribution, with agriculture comprising 77 percent.Legal document excerpt arguing to exclude expert testimony about AI dangers and dystopian scenarios.Meme with three panels showing a person and robot discussing selfhood and consciousness.Sorting hat choosing between AI models: OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and Grok.Research paper title slide showing three illustrated approaches to AI agent misbehavior detection.Person shrugging emoji with blonde hair and blue shirt.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “Anthropic and the Department of War” by Zvi Feb 25, 2026
    Show notes

    The situation in AI in 2026 is crazy. The confrontation between Anthropic and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is a new level of crazy. It risks turning quite bad for all. There's also nothing stopped it from turning out fine for everyone.

    By at least one report the recent meeting between the two parties was cordial and all business, but Anthropic has been given a deadline of 5pm eastern on Friday to modify its existing agreed-upon contract to grant ‘unfettered access’ to Claude, or else.

    Anthropic has been the most enthusiastic supporter our military has in AI and in tech, but on this point have strongly signaled they with this they cannot comply. Prediction markets find it highly unlikely Anthropic will comply (14%), and think it is highly possible Anthropic will either be declared a Supply Chain Risk (16%) or be subjected to the Defense Production Act (23%).

    I’ve hesitated to write about this because I could make the situation worse. There's already been too many instances in AI of warnings leading directly to the thing someone is warning about, by making people aware of that possibility, increasing its salience or creating negative polarization and solidifying [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (01:32) This Standoff Should Never Have Happened

    (06:07) Anthropic Cannot Fold

    (07:12) Dean Ball Gives a Primer

    (10:57) What Happened To Lead To This Showdown?

    (18:05) Simple Solution: Delayed Contract Termination

    (18:59) Better Solution: Status Quo

    (19:29) Extreme Option One: Supply Chain Risk

    (25:56) Putting Some Misconceptions To Bed

    (28:16) Extreme Option Two: The Defense Production Act

    (41:23) These Two Threats Contradict Each Other

    (42:40) The Pentagons Actions Here Are Deeply Unpopular

    (45:45) The Pentagons Most Extreme Potential Asks Could End The Republic

    (48:07) Anthropic Did Make Some Political Mistakes

    (49:13) Claude Is The Best Model Available

    (50:55) The Administration Until Now Has Been Strong On This

    (51:50) You Should See The Other Guys

    (53:16) Some Other Intuition Pumps That Might Be Helpful

    (53:55) Trying To Get An AI That Obeys All Orders Risks Emergent Misalignment

    (01:00:13) We Can All Still Win

    ---

    First published:
    February 25th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rmYB4a7Pskw7DLpCh/anthropic-and-the-department-of-war

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Andrew Curran tweets: A bar graph showing public opinion on government access to AI technology for military use.Bar graph showing public opinion on developing versus banning autonomous weapons by voting group.Two-panel comic contrasting AI safety researcher expectations versus reality with legal enforcement threats.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “Citrini’s Scenario Is A Great But Deeply Flawed Thought Experiment” by Zvi Feb 24, 2026
    Show notes

    A viral essay from Citrini about how AI bullishness could be bearish was impactful enough for Bloomberg to give it partial responsibility for a decline in the stock market, and all the cool economics types are talking about it.

    So fine, let's talk.

    It's an excellent work of speculative fiction, in that it:

    1. Depicts a concrete scenario with lots of details and numbers.
    2. Introduces a bunch of underexplored and important mechanisms.
    3. Gets a lot of those mechanisms more right than you would expect.
    4. Provides lots of food for thought.
    5. Takes bold stands.
    6. Is clearly labeled as ‘a scenario, not a prediction’ up at the top.
    7. Is fun to read and doesn’t let reality get in the way of exploring its ideas.
    8. The Efficient Market Hypothesis is false, whoo!

    Citrini: Hopefully, reading this leaves you more prepared for potential left tail risks as AI makes the economy increasingly weird.

    It is still a work of speculative fiction. It doesn’t let reality get in the way of its ideas.

    I appreciate Tor Bair's perspective of this being a case of Cunningham's Law, that the best [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (03:17) The Headline Destination

    (05:36) ...And Thats Terrible

    (08:59) SaaSpocalype Now

    (09:48) Levels of Friction Go To Zero ...And Thats Terrible

    (11:51) DoorDash and Uber

    (13:36) Breaking Into The Marketplace

    (14:24) Who Captures The Surplus?

    (15:09) For Everything Else

    (20:55) Real Estate Realism

    (23:14) Everything Is Awesome And No One Is Happy

    (23:49) Bearish For Non-AI Stocks Is Reasonable

    (25:47) Other Levels of Friction Problems

    (26:45) Oh Over There? Thats The Singularity

    (28:12) Have I Got A Job For You

    (29:51) Systemic Failure

    (32:31) What Me Worry (About Economics)?

    (37:14) We The People

    (39:29) The Efficient Market Hypothesis Is False

    ---

    First published:
    February 24th, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/bKrpLhqcoN6WycrFp/citrini-s-scenario-is-a-great-but-deeply-flawed-thought

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Stock chart showing one-day performance of four financial services companies, all declining.

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    “Claude Sonnet 4.6 Gives You Flexibility” by Zvi Feb 23, 2026
    Show notes

    Anthropic first gave us Claude Opus 4.6, then followed up with Claude Sonnet 4.6.

    For most purposes Sonnet 4.6 is not as capable as Opus 4.6, but it is not that far behind, it would have been fully frontier-level a few months ago, and it is faster and cheaper than Opus.

    That has its advantages, including that Sonnet is in the free plan, and it seems outright superior for computer use.

    Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available now on all plans, Cowork, Claude Code, our API, and all major cloud platforms.

    We’ve also upgraded our free tier to Sonnet 4.6 by default—it now includes file creation, connectors, skills, and compaction.

    Claude Sonnet 4.6 is our most capable Sonnet model yet. It's a full upgrade of the model's skills across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, knowledge work, and design. Sonnet 4.6 also features a 1M token context window in beta.

    JB: I use it all the time because I’m poor.

    This substantially upgrades Claude's free tier for coding and computer use. It gives us all a better lightweight option, including for sub-agents where you would have previously needed to use Haiku. [...]

    ---

    Outline:

    (01:53) On Your Marks

    (10:09) Reactions: Its How Much You Save

    (18:56) Bringing It Together

    ---

    First published:
    February 23rd, 2026

    Source:
    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/u2vFY4wefyqPwwDH8/claude-sonnet-4-6-gives-you-flexibility

    ---

    Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

    ---

    Images from the article:

    Performance comparison table for Sonnet 4.6 versus competing AI models across multiple benchmark categories.Line graph showing Claude Sonnet OSWorld scores increasing from 14.9% to 72.5% over time.Line graph titled Bar graph titled Bar charts showing

    Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


    Previous 1 15 16 17 18 19 26 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Reply All

    1

    Reply All Games & Hobbies
    Inside VR & AR

    2

    Inside VR & AR Gadgets
    Note to Self

    3

    Note to Self News
    BrainStuff

    4

    BrainStuff Natural Sciences
    This Week in Tech (Audio)

    5

    This Week in Tech (Audio) News
    Hands-On Tech (Audio)

    6

    Hands-On Tech (Audio) Technology
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights