TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Business

    Leadership Today – Practical Tips For Leaders

    Practical tips for leaders. Hosted by psychologist and founder of Leadership Today – Andrew Beveridge.

    Leadership Today is a weekly leadership podcast for managers, team leaders and executives who want practical, evidence-based leadership advice. Hosted by psychologist Andrew Beveridge, each episode translates the latest leadership and organisational psychology research into simple strategies you can use immediately. Discover practical tips on leadership, management, coaching, emotional intelligence, difficult conversations, delegation, employee motivation, psychological safety, team effectiveness, change leadership and workplace performance.

    Go to www.leadership.today for episodes and more information.

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Episode 143 - Showing Stress Leads to Support Jun 24, 2022
    Show notes

    SUMMARY

    Research demonstrates that showing stress can lead to greater support from others.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Welcome to episode 143 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we explore at how showing stress can lead to greater support from others.

    Have you ever thought about why we demonstrate stress? Surely showing signs of stress to others puts us at a disadvantage. Why would we want to show weakness? And why do even the most accomplished professionals still show signs of stress?

    Researchers from Nottingham Trent University and the University of Portsmouth recently reinforced what we already know - people are pretty good at identifying stress in others. As people feel more stressed, others notice more stress in them - there's nothing revolutionary about that finding. However they took it one step further to examine the impact of those stress signs on others. It turns out that people reacted more positively to those who demonstrated signs of stress than those who didn't. Those who demonstrated signs of stress were seen as more likeable. So why might that be the case? The researchers highlighted that human beings are largely a cooperative species - we survive and thrive by helping each other. They theorised that an honest sign of weakness may show that we are willing to cooperate, or at least that we're not a threat.

    All of this builds on a body of research that suggests being more emotionally expressive helps us to be well-liked by others and results in more positive social interactions.

    Here are some thoughts based on this research that you can take and apply:

    1. Show your emotions - the goal of emotional intelligence isn't to become emotionless. In fact, showing no emotion may lead us to be seen as competitive or difficult to read.

    2. Encourage others - when someone does show signs of stress, provide them with some support and encouragement. Imagine yourself in that situation and how much a kind word would help.

    3. Don't overdo it - one of the worst ways to start a speech is saying "I'm really nervous". People want someone they can relate to, but also someone that they can be confident in.

    4. Rewrite your emotions - if you feel stressed or nervous, reframe that as wanting to do a good job or being excited to present work that matters to you.

    Stress isn't necessarily bad. We can use our own and others' stress as a way to build connections and cooperation.

    REFERENCE

    Jamie Whitehouse, Sophie J. Milward, Matthew O. Parker, Eithne Kavanagh, Bridget M. Waller. Signal value of stress behaviour. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.04.001


    Episode 142 - Diversity is Good for Recruitment Jun 17, 2022
    Show notes

    SUMMARY

    Diversity isn't just great for teams and organisations - it can also help with recruitment.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Welcome to episode 142 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we look at how diversity can help with recruiting.

    We know that diversity in organisations produces lots of benefits when it is well managed. A well-managed diverse team will out perform a more uniform team every time.

    But actively promoting the diversity of an organisation also appears to help its attractiveness to job seekers. Recent research has found that disclosing key diversity scores in job advertisements increased the click-through rate of jobseekers, particularly for those organisations with higher diversity scores. Applicants were even willing to look at lower paying jobs where the employer had better diversity scores. Follow up research found this approach was particularly effective for women and people of colour who were more likely to see a diversity score as useful in deciding which jobs to apply for.

    So let's assume that you've made the effort to improve the diversity of employees within your organisation. Here are some ideas of what you might do next based on these findings:

    1. Think about diversity diversely - I always encourage clients to look beyond the more obvious diversity dimensions to also explore differing personalities, thinking styles and other factors.

    2. Promote the diversity in your teams - if you have actively built diversity in your team or organisation, celebrate that and promote it to others inside and outside your organisation.

    3. Diversity helps build even greater diversity - this research suggests that building and promoting diversity in your organisation will help attract more diverse candidates.

    Diversity isn't just a nice-to-have - it leads to real benefits for organisations, even extending to our ability to attract stronger candidates.

    REFERENCE

    Choi, Jung Ho and Pacelli, Joseph and Rennekamp, Kristina M. and Tomar, Sorabh, Do Jobseekers Value Diversity Information? A Mixed Methods Investigation (April 25, 2022). SMU Cox School of Business Research Paper No. 22-04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4025383 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4025383


    Episode 141 - Mind Wandering Improves Task Shifting Jun 10, 2022
    Show notes

    SUMMARY

    Mind wandering might actually be useful after all.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Welcome to episode 141 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we explore how mind wandering can help us at work.

    Mind wandering is usually viewed negatively. We typically view mind wandering as a failure to maintain focus, taking us away from something to which we should be paying attention. However, mind wandering may not be quite as bad as we thought. As I've shared before, it's often in those mind wandering states that we come up with out best ideas. We're not really designed to operate for long periods of time with extreme focus on one thing. Research by Wong, Willoughby and Machado published just this month helps to shed more light on how mind wandering tendencies might help us.

    Researchers found those with higher spontaneous mind wandering could handle forced switching between tasks far more effectively, transferring their attention to the new tasks faster than others.

    We know human beings are pretty bad at multitasking on similar tasks. So while we can probably walk and chew gum, we are less effective at having a phone conversation while scrolling our Instagram feed. What our brain does instead is to switch between tasks, moving attention back and forth between the two activities. That takes time and energy. If we're constantly switching, there's going to be a drop in productivity.

    As a result, we might try to focus on one thing at a time. But there are moments in every day that require us to shift our attention rapidly for reasons outside our control. For example, someone might come to us with an urgent query. Being able to shift rapidly from one task to another is called cognitive flexibility, and that's exactly what those with mind wandering tendencies appear to be better at.

    Focus serves a purpose, and so does allowing our mind to wander. Perhaps we need to think about mind wandering as a skill that can be developed. Scheduling some down-time for your brain to wander across a range of spontaneous ideas could well help you to switch between tasks more effectively.

    REFERENCE

    Yi-Sheng Wong, Adrian R. Willoughby, Liana Machado (2022) Spontaneous mind-wandering tendencies linked to cognitive flexibility in young adults, Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 102, July 2022.


    Episode 140 - Variety is the Spice of Development Jun 03, 2022
    Show notes

    SUMMARY

    Variety may be the spice of life, but it also helps with personal development.

    TRANSCRIPT

    Welcome to episode 140 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we discuss how variety can help with learning and development.

    You may have heard the expression that variety is the spice of life, but variety also turns out to be important for development and learning. Research shows us that learning in a broader and more variable setting ultimately helps us to do three things:

    1. It helps us to better identify which elements are relevant

    2. It helps us to make broader generalisations

    3. It forces us to reconstruct memories - getting us out of the ruts that might otherwise trap us

    Let's take an example from the research. If an infant is learning what a dog is as a category, it's quick and easy to just show them one type of dog. Show them that exact dog, and they will tell you that it is a dog. It takes longer to learn what a dog is if we expose that same infant to multiple types of dogs, however they're then much better at generalising that learning to a new type of dog. If I've only ever seen one type of dog, I may not correctly identify a new type of dog as a dog. If instead I learned what a dog is by seeing lots of different examples, I'm much better able to correctly identify a new type of dog.

    The same principle applies for adults learning a new sport. One option if I'm learning tennis would be to practice one shot over and over again. Another way could involve learning and practicing lots of different shots. The second way takes a lot longer to get us to the point where we can hit the ball over the net, but it is going to be much better in the unpredictability of a tennis match than the first approach to learning.

    So variety and variability in learning is harder, but it leads to better generalisation.

    The researcher Raviv highlights a great example of this relating to face recognition.He shares that "face recognition is affected by whether people grew up in a small community (fewer than 1000 people) or in larger community (over 30,000 people). Exposure to fewer faces during childhood is associated with diminished face memory." So even in social skills like face recognition, we're better off learning with variability and variety.

    Other research highlights that even incidental exposure to something new primes us to learn more about it. There's something about allowing ourselves to be exposed to new experiences and things that sets us up for learning.

    So how much variety is there in your job? How often in the average week are you trying things for the first time?

    We all know that learning is hard - it takes effort. But if we want to maximise our learning and ability, it's important to remember that variety is the spice of development.

    REFERENCES

    Limor Raviv, Gary Lupyan, Shawn C. Green. How variability shapes learning and generalization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.007

    Layla Unger, Vladimir M. Sloutsky. Ready to Learn: Incidental Exposure Fosters Category Learning. Psychological Science, 2022; 095679762110614 DOI: 10.1177/09567976211061470


    Bonus Episode - Dr Kim Hazendonk and the Neuroscience of Leadership Jun 01, 2022
    Show notes

    Dr Kim Hazendonk shares the neuroscience of leadership. Find out more about Kim and her work at www.positivebrain.com.au


    Episode 139 - Be More Strategic… Whatever That Means May 27, 2022
    Show notes

    Summary

    Have you ever received the feedback that you need to "be more strategic"? We pick apart what this might mean for your development.

    Transcript

    Welcome to episode 139 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we explore what it means to be more strategic.

    As I coach and work with a range of people, it's amazing how often people share they've received feedback that they need to be more strategic. They're typically no more clear about it than that - just that they've been told to be more strategic.

    If this sounds like you, the first advice I give is to setup time with the person who provided the feedback to better understand what they meant. In a non-challenging way, ask for examples. Have them describe what being more strategic would look like in your role. This is likely to draw out a clearer picture of what you should be working on and the impact it is having on your performance.

    I believe there are four main areas where we can all be more strategic. That being strategic is about time horizon, breadth of focus, interpersonal consideration and openness to new ideas. Let's take a look at each of these.

    1. Being more strategic could be about the time horizon you bring to your work. We can all end up not looking far enough into the future, particularly when we're under pressure. We all have a tendency to focus on immediate threats, rather than longer-term threats and opportunities. Take time to look and plan further out into the future.

    2. Being more strategic could be about the breath of your focus. Sometimes we can become too narrowly focused on our own interests or areas of expertise. Take the time to look more broadly beyond your specialisation. What are people doing in other industries or geographies? What broader trends are playing out in business and society? A great way to do this is to read more widely. If you find yourself reaching for the same kind of reading material, branch out. Ask for recommendations from others. Meet with people with different professional backgrounds and speak to them about emerging trends they are seeing.

    3. Being more strategic could be about Interpersonal consideration. Sometimes we don't take enough time to take others' needs and interests into account. We can then end up blind-sighted when our brilliant plan is opposed. Build connections across your organisation and run your ideas past others to gather their views and feedback. Ask for advice. You don't have to just take on everything they say, but it's much better to be genuinely interested and informed.

    4. Being more strategic could be about openness to new ideas. Those who are seen as not being strategic can often be caught up in the past or the current way of doing things. They may oppose change, even when the change is inevitable or likely to be beneficial. A great quality and practice here is curiosity. Rather than seeking to respond to others' ideas right away, stay curious and ask lots of questions.

    Take some time this week to examine how strategic you're being across these four areas. Have a great week.


    Episode 138 - Angry Men and Sad Women May 20, 2022
    Show notes

    Summary

    Research shows the way we interpret emotions in men and women differs, where we're more likely to see men as angry and women as happy or sad. We look at ways to challenge this to make sure we understand where people are coming from.

    Transcript

    Welcome to episode 138 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we look at the way we interpret emotions in men and women.

    It turns out that we are more inclined to associate anger with male faces, and happiness or sadness with female faces. Research shows it can work both ways - the emotion we see encourages us to perceive someone as more male or female, but also whether someone is male or female influences the emotions we see.

    While this field of research is still expanding with these findings published in Emotion just recently, it builds on the idea that we don't always get it right when we try to guess at someone's emotion and how they're feeling. This can lead to all sorts of confusion and interpersonal challenges in the workplace.

    Here are three tips for counteracting this tendency:

    1. The first tip is really simple - just ask how people are feeling. Rather than guessing or interpreting what we are seeing, a simple question such as "how do you feel about that?" can make all the difference. It can also help the person to consider how they are feeling. So often we are not tuned in to our emotional state. We can help others to check how they are feeling.

    2. The second tip is to check your biases. We all have biases - there's no point trying to pretend we don't. Rather take some time to review your areas of bias. Is it about gender, or age, or nationality? It's a fine line, but we want to recognise and celebrate diversity, while not letting it drive the way we act towards others.

    3. The third and final tip is to watch your language. Are there words that you use exclusively with one gender and not the other? I found that I would occasionally describe female colleagues who I admired as "feisty" - a word I would never use to describe a man. Instead, now I'm trying to use words like "determined", "clear" and "confident" - words I could use equally with men and women. And it may not just be gender, it could be words you use with people of different ages or nationalities. Take some time to pay attention to the words you use.

    Understanding our biases around interpreting emotions can help us to pause, reflect and change the way we respond. Take some time this week to reflect on your approach.

    Reference

    Sebastian Korb, Nace Mikus, Claudia Massaccesi, Jack Grey, Suvarnalata Xanthate Duggirala, Sonja A. Kotz, Marc Mehu. EmoSex: Emotion prevails over sex in implicit judgments of faces and voices.. Emotion, 2022;


    Episode 137 - Five Differentiators of High Performing Teams May 13, 2022
    Show notes

    Summary

    Research demonstrates five surprising differentiators of high-performing teams. How does your team stack up?

    Transcript

    Welcome to episode 137 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we look at five surprising differentiators of high-performing teams.

    The last few years have placed enormous pressures on teams. What leads some teams to collapse under the pressure while others thrive? Research by Ron Friedman and colleagues has uncovered five things high-performing teams do differently to other teams. Some of them may surprise you.

    1. People in high-performing teams make more phone calls. Bizarre I know. Surely we live in a time when making a phone call is outdated. But Friedman found those on high-performing teams made, on average, 10 phone calls per day versus 6 in other teams. Speaking over the phone is far more personalised and connecting than a text message or email. If you want to improve the performance of your team, stop typing that email and pick up the phone.

    2. High-performing teams have greater discipline around meetings. Meetings are perhaps more universally hated than any other aspect of our work life. While fewer meetings is generally better, Friedman found that high-performing teams had much greater expectations around meetings - both for those setting up the meeting and those attending. High-performing team meetings were more likely to require pre-work, more likely to have an agenda, and spent more time checking in with others around progress. If you want to increase the performance of your team, meetings and meeting disciplines are a great place to start.

    3. Members of high-performing teams don't just talk about work. It may be tempting to think that these high-performing teams are 100% focused on work and efficiency, but they actually take more time to discuss non-work topics. High-performing teams create opportunities for people to connect in genuine ways. Don't see this as a waste of time, but be intentional in connecting with others, and in connecting others together.

    4. People in high-performing teams express and receive more appreciation. We know informal recognition from leaders matters. Many surveys place this higher than salary on the list of things employees want. But in high-performing teams it's not just top-down appreciation, but also appreciation between peers. If you want to increase team performance, model showing appreciation to people. Look through a list of those in your team and think about who you could show appreciation to more.

    5. Members of high-performing teams are more genuine and comfortable being themselves. Interestingly high-performing teams don't just have greater demonstrations of positive emotions. They also have negative emotions on display more often. People can be celebrating successes, but also expressing frustrations. People are more real in their interactions, making it easier to know how people really feel and where you stand.

    More phone calls, greater meeting discipline, non-work-related connections, more appreciation, and people being themselves at work? That sounds like a great place to work to me. Note down one thing you can try this week to move towards being a high-performing team.

    Referenece

    Ron Friedman, October 2021. 5 Things High-Performing Teams Do Differently. Harvard Business Review.

    https://hbr.org/2021/10/5-things-high-performing-teams-do-differently


    Episode 136 - Social Status and Collaboration Don't Mix May 06, 2022
    Show notes

    Summary

    It turns out that designer labels and other signs of social status can get in the way of collaboration.

    Transcript

    Welcome to episode 136 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we look at the impact of perceived social status on collaboration.

    Research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that people who show off signs of social status, like fancy accessories, designer labels and high-end cars, are perceived to care more about self-interest than helping others. As a result, they are seen as less willing to collaborate and more competitive. When I came across this research there were a few examples that stand out in my mind.

    The first was a leader who stood at the front of the room, talking to his team about innovation. At the end of his talk he said "speaking of innovation, why don't you all come out to the car park". He led the team out to show them his brand new Tesla, taking the next 30 minutes or so to show off every feature of the extraordinarily expensive car. He later received feedback that members of his team found him hard to relate to.

    The next was a meeting with a General Manager. In her office I noticed she had a hand bag awkwardly placed on the table where we were meeting - almost like it was on display. I kept wondering why she didn't take it off the table to give us more space. As we left, my colleague asked me if I noticed the bag. It turned out to be a luxury handbag worth many thousands of dollars. Her peers confided that the General Manager was aloof and not connected with her team.

    The third was a meeting I heard about but wasn't involved in. It was between the CEO of a trucking company and one of his lawyers at a restaurant. The lawyer was in a perfect suit, while the CEO wore functional if slightly dated clothes. At the end of the meeting as they left the restaurant, the CEO saw one of his company's trucks coming down the road. He waved the driver over and hopped up into the cabin, asking if he and the lawyer could catch a ride back to the head office. Despite owning hundreds of trucks, he knew the driver by name. Apparently this was a regular occurrence. His employees absolutely loved him.

    While we don't want to obsess about our image, it pays to be selective in signs of wealth and social status if your objective is to build collaboration. Be wary of things that might come between you and your people.

    Reference

    Shalena Srna, Alixandra Barasch, Deborah A. Small. On the value of modesty: How signals of status undermine cooperation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2022; DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000303


    Episode 135 - Managing Bias Apr 29, 2022
    Show notes

    Summary

    We all suffer from bias. Here's how to manage bias more effectively.

    Transcript

    Welcome to episode 135 of the Leadership Today podcast where each week we bring research to life in your leadership. This week we look at ways to manage bias.

    If you ask people to picture in their mind a doctor, most will automatically assume that the doctor is male. If you ask the same people to picture in their mind a nurse, most will automatically assume that the nurse is female. It's true - more doctors are male, and more nurses are female. When we guess at someone's gender based on their profession it's like we're using approximations and rules of thumb. We are guessing at what's most likely. But our guesses can be wrong, and based on faulty assumptions. All of that can lead us to have biases that shape our behaviour. If I'm hiring a doctor, do I tend to dismiss female candidates? If I'm hiring a nurse, do I put males further down the list? My beliefs and assumptions then become a real problem - they can lead to bias and prejudice. Understanding how this occurs can help us to identify and manage our biases more effectively.

    A helpful framework for this is the Ladder of Inference from Chris Argyris. Here we picture a ladder that we're climbing.

    • The ladder starts with what we observe. That's the first rung of the ladder.
    • We then select data from what we observe.
    • We then add meanings, both cultural and personal, to that data
    • We make assumptions based on those meanings
    • We draw conclusions based on those assumptions
    • Those conclusions shape our beliefs about the world
    • We take action based on our beliefs
    • All of this loops back to influence what we observe

    This process is natural and can be helpful - we need beliefs to guide us through the wealth of data and information coming our way. But it can also be problematic when it ends up with prejudice and unfair treatment. So what can we do?

    First, we need to accept that we all have biases. No one is ever bias free, and it is extremely difficult to eliminate a bias completely. But we can reduce bias and we can minimise the impact of bias. To do that, we need to challenge our beliefs. How do we do that? Here are three ideas:

    1. Pay attention to who you spend time with. Most people tend to spend time with people who are similar to them. Start by going back through your calendar and noting who you're spending time with.
    2. Actively seek to work with people who are different to you. Broaden out your inner circle. Look around for the people who are most different to you, whether that's culture, profession, age, gender or any other factor.
    3. Become curious about other people. Be genuinely interested in other people and their perspectives. Just listen to understand. You don't have to agree with everything they say, but you also don't need to argue back.

    Our workplaces will be far more positive if we can effectively manage bias, and it all starts with us.


    Previous 1 10 11 12 13 14 32 Next

    Related Podcasts

    How I Built This with Guy Raz

    1

    How I Built This with Guy Raz Business
    Planet Money

    2

    Planet Money Business
    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    3

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast

    4

    BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast Business
    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast

    5

    The Smart Passive Income Online Business and Blogging Podcast Business
    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn

    6

    Bad With Money With Gabe Dunn Business
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights