TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    News & Politics

    Journalism

    Nathan H Coates

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    NGOs talk to a changing media Apr 04, 2012
    Show notes

    Fairfax editor, Gary Linnell, put to NGOs that it is not about what the media can do for them but what they can do for the media

    The Centre for Independent Journalism and the Australian Council of Social Services hosted this year’s NGO Media Forum at the NSW Teachers Federation in Surry Hills.

    The forum focused on stories that matter in a changing media landscape.

    Attendees from the not-for-profit sector and leading Australian journalists discussed issues such as the power of personal narratives and some of the opportunities and threats brought by new technology.

    Before lunch a panel of editors and reporters responded to audience participants on how to get important stories told and some of the resource issues facing print journalism.

    I was at the forum and spoke with Fairfax editor, Gary Linnell, and New Matilda editor, Marni Cordell.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/gary-linnell-marni-cordell-28032012.mp3


    Finkelstein report triggers hysterical response from press Mar 18, 2012
    Show notes


    The Finkelstein media report has sent the press into a frenzy about the notion of free speech. Some journalists say the hysteria is stifling community debate about effective complaint handling and promoting quality journalism.

    Ensuring independence and funding, and questions about the power of a new media council, are central issues. Also on the table are concerns about media ownership concentration and the extent to which the internet facilitates diversity.

    Despite the need for healthy debate about the media some newspapers have attacked academics; accusing them of using the inquiry to vent grievances and attack large corporations. One person copping some vicious and misleading opinion is renowned journalist, Professor Wendy Bacon.

    I spoke with Wendy Bacon about media inquiry issues and some of the accusations in the Weekend Australian newspaper.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/wendy-bacon-final-edit-15032012.mp3



    MEAA don’t like Finkelstein’s media report Mar 18, 2012
    Show notes

    The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance has described the Finkelstein Report on media regulation as a huge disappointment.

    They say the proposal for a Government body to oversee all journalism is impractical and not appropriate in a free society.

    The MEAA also says the report fails to address the demise of traditional print business models and what this means for investigative reporting and Australian democracy.

    To get across the MEAA response to the Independent Inquiry into the Media I spoke with Federal Secretary, Christopher Warren.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/christopher-warren-07032012.mp3


    Twitter untapped and some legal questions Feb 26, 2012
    Show notes

    Twitter can be an avenue for people to talk back

    Twitter continues to be a blessing for activists and journalists but in some cases remains an untapped opportunity for brands and politicians. People’s ability to visibly talk back — and do it collectively via a hashtag — can be a revealing gift and an image damaging disaster.

    Twitter began in 2006 and three years later one billion tweets had been posted. Today more than one billion tweets are sent each week and in excess of five hundred thousand accounts are created each day.

    Examples of law being applied to tweets are emerging and the first Australian defamation case involving Twitter has become an attempt to test the communication platform’s liability as a publisher.

    To look into the missed opportunities, humiliations, and legal aspects of Twitter I spoke with Associate Professor, Axel Bruns, from Queensland University of Technology; Axis Legal Principle, Sara Dolpopolo; and Canberra Times columnist and UTS Journalism academic, Jenna Price.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/twitter-without-fx-23022012.mp3


    The future of online intimacy Feb 18, 2012
    Show notes

    Picture from i09.com

    The internet can be a gateway into a plethora of impersonal interaction tempered only by an occasional emoticon. But — as is often the case — technology could be about to change all of that.

    Futurist, Ross Dawson — also known for his predictions about journalism and social media –, thinks the web might be able to facilitate inter-personal simulated intimacy.

    Based on a handful of products, some in development and others commercialised, Mr Dawson believes the physical and emotional experiences we have touching and kissing someone could eventually be had at a distance…via the web.

    He says there is viable evidence to support the idea of remote intimacy and that associated internet-based products are already popular.

    I spoke with Ross Dawson about the role of a Futurist and his “future of sex” website.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/future-of-sex-final-edit-15022011.mp3


    Freelancing, feature writing, & Pauline Hanson Dec 02, 2011
    Show notes

    Erin O’Dwyer started her career as a journalist in 1997, writing for the Queensland Times and then the Courier Mail. It was an interesting time in QLD given Pauline Hanson was on the rise.

    Since then Erin has contributed to Vogue, Australian Geographic, The Sun Herald, and the ABC’s, Radio National…to name a few.

    She won an Australian United Nations Media Peace Award in 2006 and was a finalist in 2010.

    Some recent pieces from Erin include a gritty and personal insight into online dating and a profile of Angry Boys creator, Chris Lilley.

    Now living on the South Coast on NSW, she regularly contributes to the Sydney Morning Herald and lectures at UTS.

    I spoke with Erin O’Dwyer about Pauline Hanson, “The online love lotto”, and the puzzling Chris Lilley.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/erin-odwyer-final-cut.mp3


    Kyle Sandilands shines a light on ACMA Nov 30, 2011
    Show notes

    Sandilands meets Janice Dickinson on the new and failing TV show, A Night with the Stars. Picture: Channel 7 and sourced from adelaidenow.com.au

    Popular radio host, Kyle Sandilands, has again spewed his vile lyric. This time targeting online journalist, Alison Stephenson, for writing unfavourably about a new and failed TV show that is co-hosted by Sandilands and Jackie O.

    Sandilands labelled Stephenson a “fat slag” and continued his obscenity by describing her breast as too meagre for her clothing.

    Kyle Sandilands has since been called a grub and a piece of s*$t. Calls for his axing are in abundance via Twitter.

    Despite the gravity of his comments he remains defiant. Sandilands is no stranger to the Australia Communications and Media Authority and ACMA’s effectiveness could be generously described as questionable.

    I spoke with Ben Eltham, commentator and journalist for Crikey, the ABC, and New Matilda.

    NB. Both Ben Eltham and I refer to the Independent Media Inquiry in this report. The correct reference is the Convergence Review.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ben-eltham-final-edit.mp3


    Big Harto Nov 17, 2011
    Show notes

    Outgoing News Ltd chief, John Hartigan, pours a glass of water for fellow executive, Campbell Reid, at the Independent Media Inquiry hearings in Sydney. Photograph: Nathan H Coates

    Harto entered Labor’s Independent Media Inquiry like a wounded bear come to confront his attackers. The mood was icy and the outgoing News Ltd chief was keen to set the record straight:

    “We don’t hack phones and nor do we pay bribes. And in terms of bias this is a Government that is on the nose and looking for any excuse.”

    Mr Hartigan would not be drawn on News Ltd’s awesome power but admitted to being able to “bring significant pressure”. He said any campaigns are up to individual editors and that it depends on what is meant by the term campaign. Mr Hartigan added:

    “If News Ltd was as powerful as people say, Australia would be a republic.”

    After being afforded a lengthy speech Mr Hartigan gave way to inquiry leader, Ray Finkelstein. Even though Harto’s monologue wained, it was the least Mr Finkelstein could do for a loyal CEO that may have been pushed before his time to make way for a money-man.

    Some might recoil from being a News Ltd enthusiast because of a minority of unbridled blogger/columnists (blogumnists) and suspicion that Rupert has an annoying habit of using his newspapers as political weapons… Despite News Ltd’s image journalists like John Hartigan inspire a strange and wary affection. His charisma and strident claims of believing in real journalism make for a great story.

    And a good yarn is exactly what Mr Hartigan told the media inquiry today. He was almost seething at the idea of having to answer questions — given News Ltd have not been accused of phone hacking — but at the same time was the first person questioned to refer to Finkelstein as “Sir”. Harto was busting to bellow out company lines regarding political influence and media ownership, and still he listened carefully to ideas on whether the Australian Press Council needs to be empowered to force correction.

    The scene was animated: the small room we were jammed into had filled quickly just prior to Harto’s arrival and was littered – for the first time since the opening address – with still photographers making the glamourous sound they do.

    After clearing up any doubts about News Ltd’s integrity Mr Hartigan went-in-to-bat for the Australian Press Council. He said the APC is not self regulation but independent regulation. Harto went on saying that News Ltd was able to work well with APC Chair Julian Disney and ‘by and large’ agreed with his approach.

    News Ltd executive, Campbell Reid, confirmed this apparent cooperation by saying he is working with News Ltd editors to “step-up the presence of the Press Council in our papers”.

    Mr Reid added he would prefer to continue working in the way they do now with the APC rather than within a dynamic where the APC might be able to force corrections. He continued and said:

    “We would resist strongly being told on which page and how a correction might appear.”

    Mr Hartigan did feel the need to contextualise his comments by saying previous APC administrators had been “wasteful”. Sounds like Harto is ok with Professor Disney’s current staff of 2.5 and that is a good thing given News Ltd currently account for 45% of the APC’s funding.


    The View from Nowhere Nov 14, 2011
    Show notes

    I imagine the the view from nowhere looks something like this. The picture looks nice but is not very informative. Photo: N H C

    As much as one might love — nay cut off an arm — to be able to take credit for the blog title obviously that is not possible. It was the title of a book written by NYU Philosophy Professor, Thomas Nagel, in 1986. According to Conor Friedersdorf’s article in The Atlantic, titled: “Stop forcing journalists to conceal their view from the public”, the term has been “popularised” by NYU Journalism Proffessor, Jay Rosen.

    “The View from Nowhere” is a concept well-worth exploring, writing about, thinking about some more, and then making sure — as a journalist — it is not forgotten. The best way not to forget may be to practice based on its criticism.

    Objectivity is somewhat of a nonsense notion given we are all fallible and have developed bias. The idea of being completeley objective as a journalist is not possible as choices are constantly made about newsworthiness, emphasis, and who to interview etc. Moreover it is subjective assessment that gives something meaning and the ability to be communicated in a comprehensible way: without subjectivity one does not know what anything is. In a practical and day-to-day sense the View from Nowhere is explained and problematised by Rosen, who says:

    “In pro journalism, American style, the View from Nowhere is a bid for trust that advertises the viewlessness of the news producer. Frequently it places the journalist between polarized extremes, and calls that neither-nor position ‘impartial.’ Second, it’s a means of defense against a style of criticism that is fully anticipated: charges of bias originating in partisan politics and the two-party system. Third: it’s an attempt to secure a kind of universal legitimacy that is implicitly denied to those who stake out positions or betray a point of view. American journalists have almost a lust for the View from Nowhere because they think it has more authority than any other possible stance.”

    Friedersdorf’s piece along with a blog entry by UK Guardian writer, Dan Gillmor, go some way in fleshing out the issue.

    The Atlantic article tells the story of American journalist, Caitlan Curren, who was — according to the article — sacked from WNYC — a New York based not-for-profit broadcaster — because she was caught holding a placard at an Occupy Wall Street rally. Interestingly the placard did not say anything — as noted by Friedersfdorf — about Curren wanting to run a propaganda campaign via WNYC. The placard was a quote from an article written by Friedersdorf and it said:

    “It’s wrong to create a mortgage-backed security filled with loans you know are going to fail so that you can sell it to a client who isn’t aware that you sabotaged it by intentionally picking the misleadingly rated loans most likely to be defaulted upon.”

    This quote had been published and was not considered then to be unethical. It was also picked up by NPR’s radio program, Public Money, including broadcasting a paraphrased version. Noteworthy is that the SEC — US Securities and Exchange Committeee — fined Goldman Sachs $550 million dollars for the ABACUS deal: transactions that pretty much amounted to what was written on the placard held by Curren.

    So it would seem the statement might be true or at least is true enough to warrant a half a billion dollar fine. Yet in a fit of ridiculous “zero tolerance” Curren is fired for holding the words up in front of a group of people (something the published article had done for many more).

    Friedersdorf’s piece is a great read for anyone feeling a little less human because of lofty notions about objectivity. This is by no means an excuse to become wantonly opinionated: in fact quite the the opposite. It is about defining real ethics that allow for the publication and expression of logical, well researched, and accurate arguments.

    Do the work is the message. It is easy to quote the so-called “both sides” and call the report objective even when there is more to it and the argument from one or both sides is misleading and without evidence.

    The blog entry by Dan Gillmore is mentioned because he proposes these ethical guidelines for journalists:

    “1) Be human. 2) Be honorable. 3) Don’t embarrass us.”

    To talk about this issue and the case of Caitlan Curren I spoke with media ethics expert from Curtin University, Dr Joseph Fernandez.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/joseph-fernandez-final-edit1.mp3



    Stop the cuts and let’s talk about it Oct 13, 2011
    Show notes

    http://civilrightsandwrongs.wordpress.com

    Sonia Neale is a media savvy advocate who has experienced mental illness.

    She said, “The reason I do this, the reason I tell my story, is that I want to normalise mental illness”.

    Ms Neale is also campaigning against planned cuts to Better Access – a broad Government scheme aimed at giving people access to psychologists.

    “Just because you have a mental illness it doesn’t mean you are mentally deficient in any way”, says Ms Neale – twice pointing out that being able to talk about her problems transformed her into a consistent “tax payer”.

    Mental illness affects 1 in 5 Australians. The ABS 2011 Causes of Death report ranks suicide between breast cancer and land transport accidents. People close to the issue – advocates and ordinary folk alike – say they want more reporting around mental health but note the importance of getting it right.

    Mindframe is a 10-year-old Government initiative aimed at delivering resources to journalists and other communicators so they can be confident when dealing with mental illness and suicide. People don’t want reports that stigmatise mental illness but “they absolutely want to see more media coverage”, says Mindframe Program Manager, Jaelea Skehan. She said it’s incumbent on the mental health field to provide reporters with access to people who can share their journeys of difficulty responsibly and with support. In her role Ms Skehan has worked with over 4000 journalists. She said she could only remember 5 who were not interested in mental health.

    Rural Mental Health – an online discussion hub – and Mindframe recently convened a Twitter chat on mental health and the role of the media. Mike Stuchbery, Melbourne-based teacher, writer, and occasional broadcaster, tweeted:

    “When it’s done, discussion of mental health is usually done very well. I just wish it was more regular.”

    Touting a reason for a perceived lack of reporting on mental health, he tweeted:

    “Well, to be utterly mercenary/crass, it’s not very sexy, is it?”

    PR Manager for Baptcare – a Christian not-for-profit support service for the disadvantaged –, Georgina Liew, replied:

    “I agree but I’ve also had experience of clients sharing & then shortly after regretting it…makes it hard.”

    Another concern expressed by tweeters – made up of advocates, journalists, and ordinary people – was the planned cuts to Better Access. Measures that would see the maximum allowable visits with a Medicare-funded psychologist reduced from 18 to 10. According to them, cuts to the program will harm people’s ability to access adequate psychological care.

    Practicing psychologist and Chair of the Association of Counselling Psychologists, Ben Mullings, said:

    “Research has consistently shown that people need to be offered at least 15 to 20 sessions, even for mild to moderate cases of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder”.

    Promoted alternatives to Better Access, such as Government-funded psychiatric services or the ATAPS scheme, are incomplete, Mr Mullings said. Psychiatrists “are so thin on the ground” it can take up to six months to get a session, he said.

    ATAPS – Access to Allied Psychological Services – enables certified GPs to refer certain groups of people with mental health disorders to low cost psychological services. Dr Simon Cowap, a Sydney-based GP who works with Headspace – the National Youth Mental Health Foundation – said ATAPS is not an alternative to Better Access, it is complimentary. He said ATAPS is a more targeted initiative and noted his group ran out of ATAPS funding well before the end of the last financial year.

    Sonia Neale says through Better Access she was able to access 18 sessions a year with a psychologist and that is when her “mental health improved exponentially”. Ms Neale said it can take years for the root cause of a person’s issues to be discovered and dealt with, adding:

    “A person can’t just go into therapy and say they were sexually abused when they were 12 and therefore at age 30 they have an eating disorder.”

    For Ms Neale, making the connection takes time because often underlying problems have been hidden for years. “People in the media seem to understand that mental illness is a big issue”, she said, and talks positively about her interview experiences. Ms Neale says she enjoys “de-stigmatising” mental illness and wants to encourage responsible conversation about it.

    I spoke with Sonia Neale about her experience and the proposed funding cuts to Better Access.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sonia-neale-better-access.mp3

    I also spoke with Program Manager for Mindframe, Jaelea Skehan, about the role of the media.

    https://nathanhcoates.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mindframe-j-skehan-edited-06102011.mp3

    For support please contact any of the following services.

    Lifeline (24 hours) 13 11 14

    Kids Helpline – 24 hours, for young people aged 5 to 25 years 1800 55 1800

    MensLine Australia (24 hours) 1300 78 99 78

    SANE Helpline – mental illness information, support and referral 1800 18 SANE (7263)

    Reach Out – Interactive website for young people http://www.reachout.com

    Suicide Call Back Service 1300 659 467

    beyondblue 1300 224 636


    Previous 1 2 3 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Crimetown

    1

    Crimetown News
    Up and Vanished

    2

    Up and Vanished News & Politics
    The Joe Rogan Experience

    3

    The Joe Rogan Experience Comedy
    Missing & Murdered: Finding Cleo

    4

    Missing & Murdered: Finding Cleo News & Politics
    Casefile True Crime

    5

    Casefile True Crime Games & Hobbies
    Code Switch

    6

    Code Switch News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights