TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Government

    Day In Washington: the Disability Policy Podcast

    The Disability Policy Podcast

    Advertise

    Copyright: © Creative Commons, with Attribution, some rights reserved.

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    (#DIW Podcast) Ban the Box: Good for People with Disabilities? And a few of my thoughts people with #disabilities in the #criminal #justice system Nov 15, 2015
    Show notes

    The blog quoted below is a repost from the Department of Labor's blog that was posted on November 9, 2016. I wrote it to highlight some great work being done by the Integrated Recovery Network as a part of the Add Us In initiative. Over and over, it has been reiterated that many of the people going in and out of our prison system have some sort of mental health condition. Some estimates are as high as 50%. But I have to admit, I have not heard much from the disability community about these individuals. When the nation is talking about the school-to-prison pipeline, this is a population at risk. When we talk about living independently with appropriate supports etc. these are not usually the people mentioned. But they need to be. This is a Day in Washington #Disability #Policy Podcast. http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Ban-the-Box-episode.output.mp3 Audio File: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Ban-the-Box-episode.output.mp3 Recidivism programs and advocates focus on work and housing but often do not address the mental health and/or substance abuse issues (or indeed any disability); disability programs do not address the very real problem of the interaction of these individuals with the criminal justice system. Unless both aspects are looked at, and until both communities can recognize the multiple facets and identities - the intersectionality - of this population, we will continue to fail people with disabilities who are connected to the criminal justice system. Over the past few years, a growing list of city, state and local governments; organizations; and private companies have come forward to support Ban the Box. It's an initiative to persuade employers to remove the question Have you been convicted? from job applications and delay that inquiry until the final stages of the hiring process. The goal is for employers to make hiring decisions based on a candidate's skills and qualifications, not their past transgressions. This month, President Obama took an historic step by directing the Office of Personnel Management to take action to ban the box in federal employment. As a result, OPM will modify its rules to delay inquiries into criminal history until later in the hiring process. Encouraging employers to make this shift is critical. An estimated 70 million Americans €” one in four adults €” have a criminal record. Employment is a stabilizing factor in anyone's life, providing a sense of structure and responsibility, and it's strongly correlated with reduced recidivism for those reintegrating into the community following incarceration. Because employers often hesitate to hire an ex-offender, not having to check that box can make a massive difference. Marsha Temple, of Los Angeles' Integrated Recovery Network, knows well the stories of many of the individuals for whom the box is a major barrier. For more than 15 years, she has worked to improve mental health services for people who are homeless and/or have mental health disorders €” about 44 percent of whom have spent time in jail, prison or community corrections. In California alone, there are about 33,000 prisoners with mental health disorders, roughly 30 percent of the incarcerated population. As a part of the Add Us In initiative funded by the Department of Labor's Office of Disability Employment Policy, Temple has spent the last five years focusing on providing employment services to difficult-to-place candidates with disabilities, including those who have a history of addiction and other mental health disorders, which are so often intertwined with homelessness and incarceration. One example is K.L., a 38-year-old Latina who at an early age became involved with drugs and gangs, eventually landing in prison. Upon release, she was determined to turn her life around. Recognizing that employment was key, she obtained certifications in both food handling and forklift ope...


    (#DIW Podcast) ABLE Act Update and Crabs in a Barrel Mar 24, 2015
    Show notes

    Day in Washington #Disability #Policy Podcast. Update on the #ABLEAct and Crabs in a Barrel. Did we sacrifice #disability community solidarity and the good of the many for the good of the few? http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Able-Act-Update-and-Crabs-in-a-Barre.mp3 Crabs in a Barrel by Ka-Son Reeves Audio File: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Able-Act-Update-and-Crabs-in-a-Barre.mp3 TRANSCRIPT: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington, your disability policy podcast. I'm your host Day Al-Mohamed working to make sure you stay informed. Today, I want to give a bit of an update on the Able Act. The ABLE Act was signed into law by President Obama on December 3rd, 2014. When Able accounts first came out, I'll admit, from a policy standpoint, I was pretty excited. I even did a video Day in Washington about it. Let me give you the quick details: ABLE Act savings accounts would basically allow people with disabilities (and their families), for perhaps the first time, to be able to save money for things they might need without risking their benefits, including health care. Things like, saving for school, or an accessible van (which let me tell, you I only learned recently how expensive those are), additional personal care services, or assistive technology.among other things. You see, public benefits like Supplemental Security Insurance (SSI), and Medicaid for example require you prove that you're poor. Basically, you can't have more than $2,000 and that isn't just cash, that is any asset or item of value. I still remember a young man I met during rehab. God, he couldn't have been more than 19. He cried over the fact he had to give up his classic car. It was the one thing in his life that was his. He'd rebuilt it from scratch, piece by piece. And now, to get access to a surgery he needed and additional care for his diminishing eyesight, he had to sell it. But, lets get back to the Able accounts. Now, people with disabilities and their families can have these savings accounts, which aren't too different from the tax-exempt college savings accounts that you may be familiar with. Up to $14,000 can be deposited into the account per year up to a total of $100,000 before the individual loses some of their SSI. Another key advantage of the ABLE Act is that people with disabilities need never fear that they would lose their Medicaid. For many, that is the only way they can afford their health and personal care services. So now, let me get to the compromises. Although the monetary limitations mentioned above are also compromises, the largest and the compromise that bothers me the most, is the fact that the ABLE act limits its eligibility to people with significant disabilities who got their disability before turning 26. As of March, more than half of the states are now starting to put regulations in place to create these accounts. Which is good news. I have to admit some disappointment that the Able Act will not do everything that we all once hoped. In a world where X percentage of families with a member with a disability live in poverty, we already see growing economic disparities. As it stands, this bill would seem to benefit mostly those who can afford to use these accounts. Also, although the age limit may be helpful for individuals who are born with disabilities, there are many who acquire significant disabilities after 26 that can have devastating effects on their families and their children. And now, this option is no longer available to them. I understand that this bill had and still has an expensive price tag and decisions had to be made. But this disturbs me in that I wonder if we are sacrificing one part of the community for another. When it came to ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and there was a push to remove Trans individuals from the protection of the legislation,


    (#DIW Podcast) Girl Scouts Refuse to Provide Interpreter Services for #Deaf Member Feb 23, 2015
    Show notes

    Day in Washington #Disability #Policy Podcast. #GirlScouts Refuses to Provide #Interpreter Services for #Deaf Member. Have they forgotten their own history?! They were founded by a woman with a significant hearing impairment! (Note from Day: The post is up a little late. It's dated for December but still important!) http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Girl-Scouts-Interpreting-Services-Final.mp3 Because I enjoy the irony, here is an image of the Girl Scout Promise - in Sign Language TRANSCRIPT: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington, your disability policy podcast. Together, we will explore and analyze issues of interest to the disability community. I'm your host Day Al-Mohamed working to make sure you stay informed. Today, I want to talk about a lawsuit currently in the 7th Circuit. It involves a young girl, a deaf girl, who uses sign language and it involves the Girl Scouts of America. First, let me start with Juliette Gordon Low. Juliette Gordon Low was the founder of the Girl Scouts of America. Because of chronic ear infections she became deaf in one ear in early adulthood, losing hearing in her other ear in 1886. She was 26 years old. In 1912, she created the Girl Scouts to build girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place and to create programs for girls of all age levels, races, ethnicities, beliefs, economies, geographies and physical abilities. I bring up Juliette Gordon Low, the deaf founder of the Girl Scouts of America because on December 10th, 2014 the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals heard the oral argument in a case brought on behalf of Megan Runion, a 15 year-old deaf girl who was denied American Sign Language interpreters at Girl Scout meetings. Let me read from the Complaint filed with the US District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division: Megan Runnion is a 12-year-old girl who joined the Girl Scouts when she was in kindergarten. Megan is deaf and communicates using American Sign Language or ASL. For six years, Megan was provided with a sign language interpreter by Girl Scouts for troop meetings and outings, giving her an opportunity equal to her peers to participate in Girl Scout activities. Megan loved being a Girl Scout. Near the start of 2011 to 2012 school year as Megan began sixth-grade, Girl Scouts stopped providing sign language interpreters. Despite requests by Megan's mother to reinstate the interpreter services, Girl Scouts refused. Then, in January of 2012 without warning to Megan or her family, the troop leaders announced that Megan's troop was disbanding. Megan's mother was informed that the troop was being disbanded because of her insistence that the Girl Scouts provide interpreter services for Girl Scout programs and activities. Megan has not been offered placement in a new troop with interpreter services despite her mother requesting such placement. Thus, for the very first time since kindergarten, Megan is not a Girl Scout. You'll notice this case is at the Appellate level. That's because Megan lost at the local district court level. The court said that as a matter of law, Girl Scouts is not "principally engaged in the business of providing education, healthcare, housing, social services, or parks and recreation." All items that they would receive federal financial assistance for and therefore which fall under the purview of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Thereby making it mandatory that they provide interpreter services. Just for a bit of background the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. It stablishes a federal program that basically is supposed to improve the lot of individuals with disabilities and among its purposes are, let me quote here: "...to empower individuals with disabilities to maximize employment, economic self-sufficiency, independence, and inclusion and integration into society." So the idea being that if there's an entity who receives feder...


    (#DIW Podcast) #Youth with #Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice System and Access to #Education Dec 30, 2014
    Show notes

    Day in Washington #Disability #Policy Podcast. #Youth with Disabilities in the Juvenile Justice (#JJ) System and Access to #Education http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/JJ-Youth-PWD-and-Department-of-Ed-Letter-Final.mp3 TRANSCRIPT: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington, your disability policy podcast. Together, we will explore and analyze issues of interest to the disability community. I'm your host Day Al-Mohamed working to make sure you stay informed. Today, I want to talk about young people with disabilities in the Juvenile Justice system and what the Department of Education is doing to ensure they get their Educational needs met. On December 5th The U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services sent out a letter focusing on the educational needs of students with disabilities who are in correctional facilities and highlighting that the requirements of Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) do apply to these students and it is the responsibility of States, State educational agencies and public agencies (including local educational agencies (LEAs), and responsible noneducational public agencies to make sure students are getting appropriate accommodations. €œThe U.S. Departments of Education and Justice recently stated, the fact that a student has been charged with or convicted of a crime does not diminish his or her substantive rights or the procedural safeguards and remedies provided under the IDEA to students with disabilities and their parents." Absolutely! The letter also provides information regarding technical assistance and other relevant resources to help with these students' reintegration into the school setting or participation in programs. Now let me pause and say that students with disabilities represent a large portion of students in correctional facilities. National reports put it at about 1/3 of the population of students in juvenile facilities with some having as few as 9% and others as high as 78%. Let me give you my top 7 key points made in this letter regarding IDEA, Part B requirements, as they pertain to students with disabilities: Absent a specific exception, all IDEA protections apply to students with disabilities in correctional facilities and their parents Every agency at any level of government that is involved in the provision of special education and related services to students in correctional facilities must ensure the provision of a Free Appropriate Public Education, even if other agencies share that responsibility. States must have interagency agreements or other methods for ensuring coordination so that it is clear which agency or agencies are responsible for providing or paying for services necessary for these students with disabilities in correctional facilities. State Education Agencies must exercise general supervision over all educational programs for students with disabilities in correctional facilities (unless covered by an exception) to ensure that their educational programs meet State education standards and IDEA, Part B requirements (and that also means ensuring that those same students are included in general State and district assessments. States and their public agencies must have procedures in place to identify, locate, and evaluate students who are in correctional facilities who may have a disability under the IDEA and are in need of special education and related services. Remember that wide variance in percentages of students with disabilities in correctional facilities I mentioned earlier 9% to 78%. Part of the reason for that maybe be related to the question of how much has been invested in identifying and assessing students for disabilities versus assumptions that it is behavioral or that they're problem kids.just a bit of opinion there. Unless there is a specific exception, all IEP content requirements apply to students with d...


    (#DIW Podcast) National Disability #Employment Awareness Month (#NDEAM) 2015 – A Reminder from Jim Langevin about the Value of People with #Disabilities Oct 22, 2014
    Show notes

    Day in Washington Disability #Policy Podcast. National #Disability #Employment Awareness Month (#NDEAM) http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/NDEAM-Final.mp3 Audio file: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/NDEAM-Final.mp3 TRANSCRIPT: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington. DIW is your disability policy podcast exploring and discussing issues and articles of interest to the community. I'm your host Day Al-Mohamed. October is National Disability Employment Awareness Month or NDEAM. Held each October, National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM) is a national campaign that raises awareness about disability employment issues and celebrates the many and varied contributions of America's workers with disabilities. NDEAM's roots go back to 1945, when Congress enacted a law declaring the first week in October each year "National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week." Whereas Public Resolution No. 176, 79th Congress, approved August 11, 1945, provides in part: "That hereafter the first week in October of each year shall be designated as National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week. During said week, appropriate ceremonies are to be held throughout the Nation, the purpose of which will be to enlist public support for and interest in the employment of otherwise qualified but physically handicapped workers": Now, Therefore, I, Harry S. Truman, President of the United States of America, do hereby call upon the people of the United States to observe the week of October 7-13, 1945 as National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week. I ask the governors of States, mayors of cities, heads of the various agencies of the Government, and other public officials, as well as leaders in industry, education, religion, and every other aspect of our common life, during this week and at all other suitable times, to exercise every appropriate effort to enlist public support of a sustained program for the employment and development of the abilities and capacities of those who are physically handicapped. In 1962, the word "physically" was removed to acknowledge the employment needs and contributions of individuals with all types of disabilities. In 1988, Congress expanded the week to a month and changed the name to "National Disability Employment Awareness Month." I struggled a bit with what more to say for this podcast and thought that it might make more sense to have someone else speak. So, Congressman Jim Langevin, perhaps one of the most visible Congress members with a disability spoke at the Library of Congress for NDEAM a few years ago. I want to begin by sharing a bit of my personal story - what led me to Congress and why the issues of empowerment and accessibility are so important to me. Growing up in Rhode Island, I dreamed of a career in law enforcement. That hasn't worked out exactly as I had planned, but life seldom does. When I was sixteen, I was accidentally shot while working as a police cadet Explorer Scout. An officer, thinking the gun he was handling wasn't loaded, pulled the trigger to test it. It turned out there was a bullet in the chamber, and that bullet severed my spinal cord. I've been paralyzed ever since. At first, I was convinced that that gun, and this chair, had ruined my dreams. But I learned that a badge and a gun aren't the only ways to make a difference. You can also change the world with a ballot... a pen... a creative mind. . My work in government has flowed from the fundamental idea of personal empowerment. It's about giving people the tools they need to pave their own way. To me, that's the role of government: not to give people a hand out, but a hand up. giving people the tools to pave their own way to success. What we see here today, as the Library pays tribute to the historic leaders of the disability movement and the everyday heroes in our own schools, workplaces and communities,


    (#DIW Podcast) People with #Disabilities and Accessibility of the New SF #BART Rail Cars Sep 23, 2014
    Show notes

    Day in Washington Disability Policy Podcast. People with #Disabilities and #Accessibility of the New SF #BART Rail Cars http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bart.mp3 Audio file: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bart.mp3 Photo of New BART Rail Car showing central pole with colored decals, the painted floor with the wheelchair symbol, and color coded seats. TRANSCRIPT: Recently, San Francisco's Bay Area Rapid Transit or BART revealed the new design for their rail cars. Considering that BART has probably the oldest fleet currently in use, many feel it is long past time. The new car design includes improved air conditioning, new announcement systems, LCD screens showing track and train information, color coded seating to better identify senior and disabled seats, bike racks, a third door for better people-movement in and out of cars.some great improvements. However, one new innovation has raised concerns among the Bay Area's people with disabilities. a pole located in the central open area in front of the doors and near the wheelchair area. Their specific concern is that this would potentially decrease wheelchair accessibility. Especially during high traffic periods. People would tend to stake out the center pole, crowding the pathways making it difficult for people in wheelchairs to move on to and off of the new cars. Jessie Lorenz, Executive Director of the Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco had this to say: I really believe that people with disabilities have the right to move freely, particularly on public transportation. But this new design, particularly the pole in the entry area, is going to cause people with disabilities to often times not be able to board crowded trains, and when we are able to board, we are going to do it having to apologize, doing it with less dignity than the previous model. In response to concerns, the transit agency said they moved the pole six inches away from the wheelchair access space, increasing the width of the path to 49 inches and has raised the point where three tripod branches meet the pole by 3 to 4 inches to eliminate "pinch points" for wheelchair users. In addition, they have changed the floor design to embed a wheelchair symbol in the floor to remind customers to yield that area to people in wheelchairs and added colored decals on the poles to increase contrast and make them more visible for visually impaired riders. They are also planning to test removal of poles in some locations. That sounds like some good faith changes. In particular, I like the colored decals on the poles. Have rammed myself into the poles on Washington DC's Metro a few times, those would be a nice addition. BART also stated on its website that, "We also plan to actively remind customers to step aside to make room for wheelchair users to more easily enter and exit the train, especially when conditions are crowded. Okay, having been on DC's Metro during rush hour I know exactly how useless that is and can personally attest to having to wait for 3 and 4 trains to pass before I can get on with my dog. I can squish my dog into some pretty tight places, I can't quite picture a power wheelchair as something particularly squishable. I can't say that I believe announcements alone will address that particular concern. But it sounds like BART is listening. Of course, it would have been better if the design hadn't already gotten to this final stage before accessibility concerns were raised. An interesting point that Lorenz brings up in an article is that although BART claims to have sought out and received community input from both seniors and people with disabilities, she can find no local organization that was a part of any public process regarding feedback to the design of the new cars. In addition, several members of the BART Accessibility Task Force stated that they were never asked to vot...


    (#DIW Podcast) People with #Disabilities in the #Military Sep 02, 2014
    Show notes

    Day in Washington Disability Policy Podcast. People with Disabilities and Military - New happenings in 2014. http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14-8-26-PWDs-in-Military.mp3 Audio file: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/14-8-26-PWDs-in-Military.mp3 Transcript: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington, your disability policy podcast. Together, we will explore and analyze issues of interest to the community. I'm your host Day Al-Mohamed working to make sure you stay informed. Today's topic is people with disabilities in the military. I wrote about this some last year. You see, around June of last year, Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense, lifted the ban on women in combat. Women would be allowed equal opportunity to participate in combat operations. There have been a variety of responses from the public, but I think that in general most people are generally in favor of the change. And to be fully honest, it wasn't like this was not happening already. There are women medics, women Military Police (MPs)), women helicopter pilots and women in other positions who, while not officially part of combat units are attached to such units or operating under the same or similar conditions. To ignore that reality is to denigrate their risks and their sacrifices. That discussion lead to the question of If we are allowing women in to combat, when will we allow people with disabilities to serve? It would seem that the question has become more than an academic exercise. Senator Tom Harkin spoke about this with Leon Panetta just this year The idea may sound laughable to some in the general public but the call to serve is just as strong among people with disabilities as any other community. Keith Nolan, a young man who is deaf who also happened to be a top performer in the California State University ROTC program as a part of a TED Talk said, All I really want to do is join the Army. I want to do my duty, serve my country and experience that camaraderie, and I can't, owed to the fact that I'm deaf. And he isn't alone. There's even a Facebook Page for people with disabilities who want to join the military. Corporal Garrett S. Jones, an amputee who was injured in 2007 by an insurgent's bomb during his unit's deployment to Iraq, shows his prosthetic leg. Jones is a 23-year-old Newberg, Ore., native. (Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Ray Lewis) The Army's Continue on Active Duty (COAD) program is putting military men with clear, visible disabilities back into combat, and retaining and retraining others for other forms of active duty. As of June last year, sixty-nine amputees have returned to active duty. Also of note, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, a 100-year old, 47,000-man (and woman) garrison is now commanded by Colonel Gregory D. Gadson. Colonel Gadson is a double-amputee. Perhaps even more impressive is Marine Corporal Garret S. Jones' recovery and redeployment to a combat zone after losing a leg. With those preliminary programs already in place and courageous soldiers continuing on in their chosen duty, it was perhaps not surprising to hear Secretary Panetta's response. On July 30th of this year, Representative Mark Takano filed H.R.5296 a bill to require a demonstration program on the accession as Air Force officers of candidates with auditory impairments. It mirrors a December 2013 bill from Senator Harkin. A promising project. If an individual with a disability is qualified and capable of meeting the responsibilities and selective criteria that may be necessary for certain jobs and positions, then why not? However, I doubt the issue is quite so simple. I say this because all one has to do is do an internet search to find the discussion on military forums and the response is much more negati...


    (#DIW Podcast) I Dream of Missouri – A #Disability Response to the Events of #Ferguson Aug 15, 2014
    Show notes

    Day in Washington Disability Policy Podcast. I Dream of Missouri - A Disability Response to the Events of Ferguson. http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/I-dream-of-missouri.mp3 Audio File: http://dayinwashington.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/I-dream-of-missouri.mp3 Transcript: Hello and welcome to Day in Washington. Day in Washington is your Disability Policy Podcast exploring and discussing issues of interest to the disability community. Today, I want to deviate a little from my usual legislative and regulatory analysis and talk to you about whats going on out there, in the real world beyond the papered Capitol Hill offices of Washington DC. I want to talk to you about Ferguson, Missouri. I dream of Missouri. Having spent more than ten years of my life there, having family still living there...in many ways, even though I've now spent nine years in the Washington DC metro area, I still think of Missouri as my home state. But the Missouri I dreamt of last night wasn't of Midwestern hospitality, family values, and strong communities. It is a Missouri where the streets burn with tear gas and its citizens cower in their homes fearful from their own government. It is where peaceful protesters are treated as deadly threats and where media and both traditional and non-traditional are corralled and controlled. When a young man dies it is a tragedy. When a community speaks out and is forcefully silenced, it is a tragedy. When the nation responds not with immediate anger at the injustice or calls for action, but instead with platitudes and calls for calm, it is a tragedy. Teargas, and less-leathal weapons, because none are truly non-lethal, no-fly zones and martial law. Detaining press, preventing people from assembling peacefully.This is not the America that many of us know - the land of the free and home of the brave. The land where a rag tag group of rebels overthrew the great British empire. Where abolitionists took the nation to war to ensure freedom. Where civil rights was a movement that helped a nation grow up and truly envision that promised equality. We glorify our rebels and protestors of history and yet today, we call them potential threats to safety and dangerous. We criminalize and dehumanize them. No, it isn't the Missouri I knew. But in truth, it is the Missouri that was likely always there. It was always there and most of us...most of us choose to pretend that the inequities in our communities and neighborhoods don't exist. To the President, to Governor Jay Nixon, to legislators and policymakers I say: This isn't a politically expedient issue. It was the issue of expediency that in part caused the tangled ugly events of this week. Matters of race and disparity and inequality and injustice aren't expedient and they deserve more than recognition of it as the heartbreak of a single family. This is more than the initial incident, the death of Michael Brown. But to speak of it only as a single heartbreak is to invalidate the feelings of fear and anger of an entire community. Their response tells us about the heartbreak of a community. It tells us about the feelings of helplessness in the face of perceived injustice and of the oppression protest. This is a community who didn't trust and didn't have faith in the system. This is a community that saw no other way. Mr. President, Governor Jay Nixon, legislators and policymakers, this is about responsibility and accountability. This is a failure of the system YOU represent. The system failed. It failed Michael Brown. It failed Eric Garner, 43, who had asthma, was pulled to the sidewalk onto his chest and restrained in a chokehold by an officer, a chokehold that killed him. It failed Ethan Saylor, 26, who had Down syndrome, went to see a movie and when he refused to leave was wrestled to the floor by deputies, held down, and handcuffed with such force that he suffered a fracture in his ...


    Anniversary of Olmstead Decision – 10 years and counting… Jun 22, 2009
    Show notes

    Greetings! Great news! Things are still busy, but I'm hoping that with the brand new Twitter feed, I can now offer a little more detail as to everything going on here in Washington DC. Day in Washington Disability Policy Podcast - Episode Summary: Day in Washington looks at disability policy issues. Today's podcast/blog post is a very special one, celebrating the anniversary of the Olmsted decision. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the case, suffice it to say that this lawsuit is the cornerstone of the movement towards deinstitutionalization for people with disabilities. Audio File: Click here for audio file or use embedded audio player below Full Text File: See Comments Resources: Olmstead Overview Olmstead Lawsuit - Read it for yourself Olmstead and its Impact on Long Term Services and Supports Detailed Olmstead Information .


    Kindle 2, Authors Guild and Reading Rights Apr 09, 2009
    Show notes

    Just a quick update. Some of you may be aware that there is a protest that took place on Tuesday, April 7 outside the offices of the Authors Guild. The reason for the protest is with regard to Amazon's e-book reader, the Kindle. The latest version of the Kindle, which was unveiled in February has a text-to-speech feature which basically reads aloud the book's text in an electronic voice. However, because of complaints from the Authors Guild that this was copyright infringement, and concern that the feature would hurt sales of audio books, Amazon gave publishers and authors the ability to remove the text-to-speech function for their books. The protesters, part of the Reading Rights Coalition, argue that people with print disabilities who cannot effectively read print because of a visual, physical, perceptual, developmental, cognitive, or learning disability deserve the opportunity to enjoy access to books on an equal basis with those who can read print. Disabling the text-to-speech function and requiring that people with disabilities submit to "certification" or "registration" is not an acceptable compromise. The Reading Rights Coalition is a joint effort made up of 28 organizations representing upwards of 15 million Americans who are blind or otherwise unable to readily use traditional print. Their perspective is quite compelling: "The water company does not charge separate rates for the use of water depending on whether the consumer is drinking it or using it to wash dishes; it simply charges for the amount of water used. By the same token, an e-book is not inherently visual or aural, and to claim that reading it either visually or aurally should cost a different price is discriminatory." Amazon has remained mostly on the sidelines so far. However, in a statement the company insisted that text-to-speech is not copyrights infringement. "No copy is made, no derivative work is created, and no performance is being given." Mika Pyyhkala from the National Federation of the Blind offers some comments as he heads out on a plane from Boston to New York for the protest. Audio File: Mika Pyyhkala on his way to the Kindle Protest I hope to have some additional audio on the event soon (thank you, Mika) and will do my best to provide a transcript soon after. Check out the links below for more information. Resources: Reading Rights Coalition National Federation of the Blind Press Release - Quotes a variety of organizations supporting Kindle accessibility. Authors Guild Article on Kindle Accessibility - Includes Authors Guild suggestion of "disability certification." Association of Blind Citizens


    Previous 1 2 3 4 5 7 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights