Stay ConnectedAudio of Supreme Court opinions. Finally.
Listen to full-length readings of the most current opinions as they are issued by the Court. Or, browse through a library containing dozens of landmark opinions from the past. Either way, it’s free! A rare find for SCOTUS nerds.
Copyright: © Copyright 2022 All rights reserved.
"Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government," wrote Justice Alito, in his statement explaining why he concurred in the denial of certiorari in Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney (February 20, 2024).
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024).
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts
The brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, decided February 8, 2024.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts
Today I'll be reading the brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Murray v. USB Securities (Feb 8, 2024) regarding the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts
Final episode for this opinion.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Next episode will be the last for this opinion.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity.
Note: These episodes may be a little shorter than usual, as I want to get them up ASAP.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity.
Note: These episodes may be a little shorter than usual, as I want to get them up ASAP.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity.
Note: These episodes may be a little shorter than usual, as I want to get them up ASAP
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Today I'll be reading the eagerly anticipated D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision in U.S. v. Trump (the Jan 6th case), as I promised early last month when I read Judge Tanya Chutkin's memorandum opinion denying Donald Trump's motion to dismiss the case, claiming that presidents have blanket criminal immunity.
Note: These episodes may be a little shorter than usual, as I want to get them up ASAP.
Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcasts.
Our TOPPODCAST Picks 
