News
**The Trial Of Donna Adelson | The Murder Of Dan Markel**

Uncover the shocking details behind the **2014 murder of Florida law professor Dan Markel** in this gripping true crime podcast. **“The Trial of Donna Adelson, The Murder of Dan Markel”** investigates the **Adelson family’s deep entanglement** in a crime that shook Tallahassee and the legal world.

At the center of this case is **Donna Adelson**, now facing charges for her alleged role in orchestrating Markel’s murder, alongside her son, **Charlie Adelson**, the convicted mastermind serving a life sentence for **first-degree murder**. The podcast delves into the **family’s motives**, including a bitter custody battle and financial disputes, while exploring **Harvey Adelson’s suspected but uncharged involvement**.

With exclusive insights into **cell phone records, financial transactions, and witness testimonies**, this podcast provides a **comprehensive analysis of the prosecution’s case**, the **legal proceedings**, and the **dark dynamics of a family torn apart by crime**. If you’re fascinated by **true crime, courtroom drama, and real-life betrayals**, this series is a must-listen.

🎧 **Subscribe now to uncover the truth behind one of Florida’s most infamous murder-for-hire cases!**

Latest Episodes:

Donna Adelson Trial — Deputy Josh Turner Explains Jail Pod Video & “Jail Daughter” Claims Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial — Deputy Josh Turner Explains Jail Pod Video & “Jail Daughter” Claims

This clip centers on Deputy Josh Turner as he walks jurors through the nuts and bolts of jail surveillance video connected to interactions between Donna Adelson and informant Drina Bernhardt (often referenced as the “jail daughter”). Turner’s testimony is clinical and detailed: vantage points of cameras, what the footage captures (and what it doesn’t), how movement inside the pod is tracked, and how those frames line up with interviews and reports. The defense’s agenda is clear—ground the informant narrative in verifiable timestamps and pixels rather than rumor and retelling.
Why it matters: jailhouse informants can sway juries—positively or negatively—depending on credibility and corroboration. Turner’s on-the-ground account gives jurors the framework to assess whether Bernhardt’s claims match the video record. If the footage contradicts or fails to support key allegations, it dents the state’s storyline. If it aligns, it props it up. Either way, Turner’s calm, technical pass through the evidence helps separate speculation from what the cameras actually show.
Pay attention to his explanation of camera coverage gaps, any discussion of notes or communications, and whether the observed interactions are as clear-cut as some testimony suggests. Also note how both sides use Turner: the defense to challenge narrative leaps, the prosecution to emphasize consistency where it exists.
The takeaway for viewers is straightforward: this is an evidence tutorial, the kind that resonates in deliberations. No theatrics—just surveillance and sworn answers that help jurors decide what’s real, what’s plausible, and what’s noise.
#hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #JoshTurner #JailhouseInformant #SurveillanceVideo #TrueCrime #Courtroom #Evidence #TrialUpdate
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial — Tim Kelly (Realtor) Says Family Looked at Tallahassee Homes Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial — Tim Kelly (Realtor) Says Family Looked at Tallahassee Homes

In this raw courtroom clip from the Donna Adelson Trial, Tallahassee realtor Tim Kelly takes the stand and lays out a detail the defense wants front and center: back in 2011, he showed homes to Donna and Harvey Adelson—appointments he says were set up at Dan Markel’s request. Kelly methodically explains when the showings happened, the neighborhoods he toured with the Adelsons, and the ordinary, practical tone of those conversations. It’s not flashy testimony, but it’s the kind that makes jurors pause: if Donna and Harvey were considering a move to Tallahassee years before Markel’s 2014 murder, how does that square with the state’s theory that the family was fixated on getting Wendi and the kids out of Tallahassee?
Why it matters: motive. Prosecutors have framed this case around family conflict, relocation pressures, and control. Kelly’s testimony can’t rewrite the larger timeline—but it complicates it. The defense is using him to suggest the Adelsons’ priorities weren’t a one-way street. If jurors conclude the family at one time explored living near Markel instead of removing the children from him, that nuance could seed reasonable doubt around the state’s overarching motive story.
Watch for the specifics: who contacted whom (Kelly says Markel), how the showings unfolded, and how the search ultimately fizzled. The defense is aiming for a simple takeaway—this was normal family logistics, not a breadcrumb trail toward violence. The prosecution, for its part, will argue the 2011 showings are a blip with little bearing on the decisions and communications that followed years later.
Bottom line: Kelly adds a quiet but strategic brick to the defense wall. It’s not the kind of testimony that makes headlines, but it’s exactly the kind that jurors revisit when they’re sorting motive from speculation.
#hashtags #DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TimKelly #TrueCrime #Tallahassee #MurderForHire #Courtroom #TrialUpdate #LegalAnalysis
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The 44 Checks That Could Convict Donna Adelson | Hidden Paper Trail Exposed Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

The 44 Checks That Could Convict Donna Adelson | Hidden Paper Trail Exposed
How do you pay a woman who doesn’t work for you? Easy—just write forty-four checks after a murder. In this explosive episode, Tony Brueski and legal expert Eric Faddis unravel the damning paper trail linking Donna Adelson directly to Katherine Magbanua, the alleged go-between in the murder-for-hire plot that ended Dan Markel’s life.
Every single check was personally signed by Donna. Every single payment came after Dan's murder. And they all mysteriously stopped after an FBI undercover sting operation. Coincidence? Not likely.
Eric Faddis dissects the legal impact of this financial evidence, how prosecutors frame it as consciousness of guilt, and whether the defense can realistically claim Donna was just being generous or blindly signing off on shady bookkeeping.
This is more than just check fraud—this is motive with a memo line. Follow the money, and you just might follow the conspiracy straight to the top.
Hashtags:
#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #MurderForHire #TrueCrimePodcast #TonyBrueski #EricFaddis #CrimeScene #JusticeForDan #AdelsonTrial #FinancialEvidence
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson- From Game show contestant to murderer? With Dr. Carmela Epright Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson- From Game show contestant to murderer? With Dr. Carmela Epright

In this breaking news true crime special, we unpack the latest chapter in the Trial of Donna Adelson, the Miami matriarch prosecutors say helped orchestrate a murder-for-hire plot that ended the life of Florida State law professor Dan Markel in 2014. Drawing on years of investigative reporting, courtroom testimony, and expert analysis, this in-depth recap walks viewers through the people, the motive, and the evidence that turned a bitter custody fight into a homicide case that has gripped the true crime community.
Our discussion centers on Donna Adelson’s alleged role, her influence over her children, and the prosecution’s theory that the goal was simple and ruthless: free Wendi/Wendy Adelson to relocate the children to South Florida. We examine the state’s narrative piece by piece—beginning with the hitmen already convicted, moving through the middle-man links, and landing squarely on the items jurors heard in court: a day planner containing Dan Markel’s license plate, wiretapped calls that captured the family’s reactions, and the undercover “bump” that set key conversations in motion. We also assess the explosive “jailhouse script” allegation—handwritten lines a witness says Donna wanted her to memorize—raising stark questions about consciousness of guilt and witness coaching.
Beyond the documents and recordings, the human drama is undeniable. Philosopher and neuropsychiatry scholar Dr. Carmela Epright offers a clear psychological lens on power, control, and family dynamics, including the testimony of Rob Adelson, whose account of his upbringing and estrangement delivered one of the trial’s most emotional moments. We also revisit testimony about Wendi/Wendy Adelson’s movements the day of the shooting and why prosecutors argue those facts matter. Lastly, we evaluate the defense’s performance, the strategy missteps that drew headlines, and the looming questions about what may come next—whether additional charges are possible and how any verdict could shape the pursuit of justice for Dan Markel.
This is not speculation; it’s a methodical news recap with the tone of an investigative podcast, designed to help viewers follow the timeline, understand the evidence, and weigh the stakes. From missing-person alerts to murder-for-hire prosecutions, true crime reporting lives in the details, and this case is defined by them: texts, travel plans, financial threads, and voices on a line that never stopped recording. If you follow court trials, justice reform, or high-profile family-crime cases, this is the essential digest you need to get up to speed and stay there.
#DonnaAdelson #WendiAdelson #DanMarkel #CharlieAdelson #TrueCrime #BreakingNews #MurderForHire #JusticeForDan #Courtroom #Wiretaps
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson & Betty Broderick Parallels in Narcissistic Courtroom Theater Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson & Betty Broderick Parallels in Narcissistic Courtroom Theater
In the Trial of Donna Adelson, many courtroom observers can’t help but notice echoes of infamous cases from the past. One of the most striking comparisons? Betty Broderick, the once “perfect wife and mother” who shocked America in 1989 when she murdered her ex-husband and his new wife. Just like Donna Adelson, Betty positioned herself as the victim — rewriting the narrative to justify her actions and refusing to show remorse.
This segment from Hidden Killers Live with Tony Bruski, Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels takes viewers back to Betty Broderick’s testimony, dissecting her chilling cadence and matter-of-fact storytelling. The panel explores how Betty framed her double murder not as a crime but as an act of “self-preservation.” They note how narcissistic defendants often try to control perception — a trait now being scrutinized in Donna Adelson’s own demeanor in court.
The conversation also highlights the performative aspect of these trials: the calculated facial expressions, the selective memory lapses, and the unsettling calm in recounting horrific acts. Betty’s testimony, at times almost rehearsed, feels eerily familiar when placed alongside Donna’s tightly controlled courtroom posture.
Why does this matter? Because jurors don’t just weigh evidence — they watch behavior. The Adelson family matriarch’s strategy to present herself as the protector of her children is undermined by a long trail of wiretaps, coded conversations, and now, the shadow of cases like Betty Broderick’s. History shows that narcissists often overestimate their ability to manipulate a jury.
This true crime analysis doesn’t just revisit Betty Broderick — it uses her story as a psychological mirror to understand Donna Adelson, offering a deeper look into how narcissism and courtroom theatrics collide in high-stakes trials.
🏷 Hashtags
#DonnaAdelson #BettyBroderick #DanMarkel #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CourtroomDrama #NarcissismOnTrial #HiddenKillers #AlecMurdoch #CrimeDocumentary #TrialCoverage
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The FULL Donna Adelson Extravaganza: FBI Profiler Robin Dreeke Dissects Donna, Wendy & Charlie Adelson’s Narcissistic Lives Sep 03, 2025

Show notes

The FULL Donna Adelson Extravaganza: FBI Profiler Robin Dreeke Dissects Donna, Wendy & Charlie Adelson’s Narcissistic Lives
In this explosive deep dive, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, former head of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, joins Hidden Killers Live to unravel the tangled psychology of the Adelson family. At the center of this discussion: Donna Adelson’s obsessive control, Charlie Adelson’s dangerous insecurities, and Wendy Adelson’s revealing slip-ups that pointed investigators toward a murder-for-hire plot.
The episode begins with comparisons between Jackie Fulford, Donna’s so-called “doppelgänger attorney,” and the broader Adelson pattern of surrounding themselves with mirrors of their own self-image. Dreeke describes this as the classic “echo chamber” — a family environment where validation replaces reality, breeding narcissism, paranoia, and control.
From there, the conversation turns to the police interrogation of Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste, Wendy Adelson’s ex-boyfriend. His testimony is not only haunting but also deeply telling. Lacoste recalls Wendy confiding that her brother Charlie had “looked into options” for getting rid of Dan Markel. He describes Charlie openly talking about money, hitmen, and how much it would cost — chilling disclosures that made Charlie the first suspect to enter his mind when news of Dan’s murder broke.
Robin Dreeke dissects Lacoste’s credibility, noting his remarkable memory for dates, his consistent disclosure tempo, and his vulnerability as a man still under Wendy’s spell. Dreeke explains how narcissistic family systems thrive on manipulation, impulsivity, and a desperate need for external validation — traits seen across Donna, Wendy, and Charlie.
The discussion also explores Charlie Adelson’s bizarre associations with Green Berets, criminal circles, and the Latin Kings, questioning why a wealthy dentist would gravitate toward such company. Dreeke suggests this was Charlie’s way of masking insecurity, rebelling against his mother’s dominance, and fabricating an image of power.
This is not just a story of one murder — it’s a case study in how toxic family dynamics, unchecked narcissism, and impulsive decisions can escalate into tragedy.
Hashtags
#DanMarkel #AdelsonFamily #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #FBIProfiler #RobinDreeke #CourtCase
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Private Investigators Tarana Kahn & Eddie Varnes Sep 02, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial: Private Investigators Tarana Kahn & Eddie Varnes
The Trial of Donna Adelson pressed forward today with testimony from two private investigators, Tarana Kahn and Eddie Varnes, who each offered critical insight into the defense’s strategy and the timeline of events surrounding the 2014 murder of law professor Dan Markel.
Kahn and Varnes were brought in as part of the defense team’s efforts to reframe the investigation and sow doubt about the Adelson family’s alleged role in the murder-for-hire plot. Their testimony zeroed in on investigative procedure, evidence handling, and the reliability of witnesses who tied the Adelsons to the crime. Both investigators suggested there were gaps in how law enforcement gathered and interpreted information, raising questions about whether the narrative against Donna Adelson had been too narrowly focused from the start.
But the prosecution was ready. They used cross-examination to underscore that while private investigators can surface alternative theories, they do not operate under the same legal standards or evidentiary safeguards as state investigators. Jurors watched as the credibility of these defense witnesses was tested in real time. Were they uncovering genuine blind spots in the case—or simply muddying the waters for Donna Adelson?
What made this testimony particularly compelling is how it speaks to the broader defense playbook. Instead of outright denying the mountain of wiretaps and coded conversations implicating the Adelson family, the strategy appears aimed at creating just enough uncertainty that one or two jurors might hesitate. Kahn and Varnes are crucial to that approach, providing the “alternative story” Donna’s attorneys desperately need the jury to consider.
This segment highlights the delicate dance between defense-hired experts and prosecutors determined to expose bias. With each exchange, jurors are left to decide: Are these investigators uncovering truths, or simply performing damage control for a family accused of orchestrating murder?
🏷 Hashtags
#DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #TrialCoverage #HiddenKillers #PrivateInvestigator #CourtroomDrama #MurderForHire #JusticeForDan #AdelsonTrial
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Legal Expert Richard Shagrin Testifies on Donna’s Words and Intent Sep 02, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial: Legal Expert Richard Shagrin Testifies on Donna’s Words and Intent

In the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense called Richard Shagrin, a seasoned legal expert, to the stand. His role wasn’t to rehash facts, but to lend the jury a professional lens through which to interpret Donna’s words, actions, and state of mind in the aftermath of Dan Markel’s murder.
Shagrin, a respected criminal defense attorney with decades of courtroom experience, carefully walked jurors through how conversations and recorded statements might be understood in context. His testimony sought to counter the prosecution’s framing of Donna’s remarks on wiretaps and jailhouse communications—remarks that prosecutors argue show her involvement in the conspiracy. By presenting Shagrin, the defense aimed to show that the same words could be seen not as coded admissions of guilt, but as ambiguous phrases open to interpretation.
Why does this testimony matter? In a case built largely on circumstantial evidence and conversations, intent is everything. If jurors accept the prosecution’s interpretation, Donna is cast as the matriarch who helped orchestrate her former son-in-law’s murder. But if they believe Shagrin’s framing, those same words could look more like the ramblings of a distressed mother reacting under pressure. His testimony didn’t just provide expert commentary—it gave the jury permission to question whether the state’s reading of Donna’s statements is the only reasonable one.
This clip captures Shagrin’s full courtroom appearance, where law, language, and perception collide. His testimony underscores how critical context is in determining guilt or innocence—and how the defense is fighting to keep doubt alive in one of Florida’s most closely watched trials.
#DonnaAdelsonTrial #RichardShagrin #LegalExpert #CourtroomTestimony #TrueCrime #DanMarkelCase #MurderForHire #DefenseWitness #AdelsonFamily #JusticeForDan
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Digital Forensics Expert Breaks Down Donna & Charlie’s Call Records Sep 02, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial: Digital Forensics Expert Breaks Down Donna & Charlie’s Call Records
In this pivotal moment from the Trial of Donna Adelson, the defense introduced testimony from digital forensics expert Kelsey Guay, a former investigator with the Portland Police Bureau who has logged more than 400 hours of training in digital analysis, including 100 hours on cell-site location evidence. Her role was to take jurors deep into the world of call logs, data records, and phone analysis, giving the courtroom a technical yet critical perspective on Donna’s communications with her son, Charlie Adelson.
The heart of her testimony revolved around Donna’s call patterns with Charlie, the son already convicted of orchestrating Dan Markel’s murder-for-hire. Prosecutors have long argued that suspicious timing and frequency of calls between mother and son reflect coordination, while the defense countered with Guay’s expert lens to suggest alternative explanations or reasonable doubt.
Why does this testimony matter? Because in the absence of a smoking gun, the state leans heavily on circumstantial evidence—particularly Donna’s phone activity. Guay’s testimony potentially reshapes how jurors interpret that digital trail: were Donna’s calls a sign of conspiracy, or the normal communication of a worried mother deeply entangled in family stress?
Her credentials lent weight to her analysis, but the cross-examination loomed large, pressing the question of whether forensics can truly capture intent. The result: a layered and technical testimony that left jurors with more to consider about the role Donna’s conversations with Charlie played in this tragic saga.
This raw courtroom footage captures Guay’s testimony in full—watch closely as the digital breadcrumbs of the case are laid bare for the jury, piece by piece, in a trial where every call, text, and connection could sway the final verdict.
#DonnaAdelsonTrial #DigitalForensics #CallRecords #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkelCase #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #ExpertWitness #MurderForHire #JusticeForDan
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Trial: Judge Denies Motion for Acquittal, Case Moves Forward Sep 02, 2025

Show notes

Donna Adelson Trial: Judge Denies Motion for Acquittal, Case Moves Forward
In a critical moment in the Trial of Donna Adelson, defense attorney Josh Zelman filed a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that prosecutors had failed to provide direct evidence linking Donna Adelson to the murder-for-hire plot that took the life of law professor Dan Markel. It was a bold move—one that, if granted, would have ended the trial immediately and cleared Donna of the charges.
But Judge Stephen Everett was quick to shut that door, ruling that the state had provided enough evidence for a reasonable jury to consider. In courtroom terms, this was a decisive victory for the prosecution, ensuring the trial would move into the defense’s case rather than collapsing midstream.
Why does this moment matter? Motions for acquittal are standard procedure, but they often signal the defense’s strategy and confidence in poking holes in the state’s case. The denial reinforces the fact that prosecutors have laid enough groundwork—through wiretaps, financial records, and family dynamics—to justify moving forward. For jurors, it underscores that the evidence, though circumstantial, is still strong enough to be weighed carefully.
The clip captures the judge’s ruling in real time, marking a turning point in the trial. The defense may continue to argue that the evidence is too thin, but as of now, the jury will hear their side fully—and Donna Adelson will remain squarely in the hot seat as her fate hangs in the balance.
#DonnaAdelsonTrial #DanMarkelCase #JudgeEverett #CourtroomDrama #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #MurderForHire #TrialUpdates #JusticeForDan #LegalDrama
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872