The Stand with Meg Show - TopPodcast.com

View Top 200 Chart

Back to Rankings Page

The Stand with Meg Show — Government
The Stand with Meg Show

🎙️ The Stand With Meg Show
Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.

Hosted by Meg🎙️

Home of the FIRST EVER Family Rights survey. Evidence over silence.

I’m Meg, investigative journalist and mom of five. I haven’t seen or heard my kids’ voices since January 29, 2024, and I learned this system the hard way, pro se. My story isn’t unique, and that’s the problem.

I built Stand With Meg alone, a public record of 5,000+ family-reported submissions from all 50 states, DC, and 18 countries, documenting $950M+ in reported losses. Each episode exposes the patterns families report, elevates protective parents, mothers and fathers, and demands accountability.

🎙 Includes The Shawn Lee Report: general legal education with criminal trial attorney Shawn Lee, not legal advice. Episodes premiere live with public Q&As.

📢 Follow the Money: with Chandini Kumar Portteus, I’m calling for a federal audit of how Title IV-D money moves through family court. Call for a freeze and audit in your state: my.StandwithMeg.com/take-action

📍 Start at StandwithMeg.com, and share the FIRST EVER Family Rights survey while you’re there. Every voice makes the case stronger.

📲 Follow on social media:
Instagram: @StandWithMeg
TikTok: @StandWithMeg
YouTube: @StandWithMeg
Facebook: Stand With Meg
X: @StandWithMeg

📲 Follow on social media:

Instagram: @StandWithMeg

TikTok: @StandWithMeg

YouTube: @StandWithMeg

Facebook: Stand With Meg

Twitter/X: @StandWithMeg

Copyright: © 2024 Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption

Latest Episodes:

Separated Without a Voice: A Mother’s Heartbreaking Fight Against False Accusations and Family Court Bias Oct 19, 2024

Show notes

Family courts are supposed to protect children, but what happens when they tear families apart based on false accusations? In this deeply emotional episode of Separated Without a Voice: A Mother’s Heartbreaking Fight Against False Accusations and Family Court Bias, we share the heartbreaking story of Elena Ward, a mother from Johnson County, Kansas, who has been separated from her five children for over 260 days. Despite doing everything she could to comply with court orders, Elena was never given a chance to tell her side before losing her kids—taken away due to accusations she says are unfounded and backed by a biased system. She hasn’t seen her children since.

Elena opens up about her painful journey, facing unchallenged allegations and alleged ethical breaches by Guardian ad Litem Victor Langston, which have kept her from being with her children. Her story shines a light on a larger issue within family courts, where parents—especially mothers—are too often silenced, facing systemic biases, lack of transparency, and legal inequities that make it nearly impossible to fight back against unjust outcomes.

Supported by research on gender disparities, civil rights violations, and a growing grassroots call for reform, this episode reveals why urgent change is needed in family courts. Join us as we uncover the hidden struggles of parents like Elena, and ask: how many more families must suffer before the system is fixed?

#FamilyCourtTyranny #ReformFamilyCourt #StandWithMeg #BrokenSystem #FamilyCourtReform #CreateAMovement #JusticeForFamilies #GenderBias #FalseAccusations #LegalReform #ChildWelfare

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Guardian Gone Rogue? Allegations of Bias and Misconduct Against Victor Langston Oct 18, 2024

Show notes

In this explosive episode of Justice Unmasked: Family Court Corruption, we dive into the serious allegations brought against Guardian ad Litem, Victor Langston, by petitioner Elena Ward (Case No. 17CV3057). Ms. Ward's formal complaint paints a troubling picture of bias, misrepresentation, and a failure to fulfill his legal duties as a child advocate under Kansas law.

From claims of preferential treatment towards her ex-husband to the lack of investigation into allegations of abuse and parental alienation, Ms. Ward argues that Mr. Langston's actions have severely impacted her ability to protect her children. She raises questions about his monitoring of her social media, his misleading statements in court, and his failure to communicate critical updates on her children's well-being.

The episode explores these accusations in detail, including potential gender bias and a pattern of misconduct that extends beyond Ms. Ward’s case, as other mothers have stepped forward with similar stories. We’ll discuss the legal standards for Guardians ad Litem and why Ms. Ward’s complaint is calling for a comprehensive review of all cases involving Mr. Langston.

Are the courts truly acting in the best interest of children, or is there a deeper issue at play? Tune in to learn more about this unfolding legal battle, the serious consequences of GAL misconduct, and the urgent need for accountability in our family court system.

#FamilyCourtTyranny #ReformFamilyCourt #StandWithMeg #BrokenSystem #FamilyCourtReform #CreateAMovement #GALMisconduct #ChildAdvocacy #LegalAccountability #ParentalRights #JudicialIntegrity

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Fight for Fairness: The Legal Battle of Stacy Lynn Dimarco Oct 17, 2024

Show notes

n this episode of Fight for Fairness: The Legal Battle of Stacy Lynn Dimarco, we explore the complex legal battle in the case of Stacy Lynn Dimarco (also known as Stacy Lynn Jones) vs. The State of Oklahoma (Case No. F-2024-37). Stacy Lynn Dimarco appeals her convictions for violating a child custody order and obstructing an officer, presenting three primary arguments: insufficient evidence, double punishment, and a potential Brady violation.

We break down each side’s arguments, including Ms. Jones’ defense that she acted to protect her child and the State’s assertion of sufficient evidence to uphold the verdict. We also delve into the double punishment debate, citing parallels with past cases like Tate v. State, and consider the implications of the missing body camera footage that Ms. Jones claims could have exonerated her. Tune in for a thorough analysis of this case, which raises significant questions about parental rights, legal interpretations, and procedural fairness in the justice system.

Join us as we unpack the complexities of this appeal and its broader implications. Whether you’re interested in family law, criminal justice, or judicial reform, this episode sheds light on a crucial case that highlights the challenges within our legal framework.

#FamilyCourtTyranny #ReformFamilyCourt #StandWithMeg #BrokenSystem #FamilyCourtReform #CreateAMovement #ParentalRights #JusticeSystem #AppealCase #LegalAnalysis #JudicialReform"

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Unmasking Parental Alienation: Dr. Craig Childress on Custody Disputes and Ethical Challenges Oct 16, 2024

Show notes

Dive deep into the controversial and complex world of parental alienation within custody disputes in this compelling podcast. "Unmasking Parental Alienation" offers a comprehensive analysis, featuring insights from the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute (CCPI), the groundbreaking work of Dr. Craig Childress, and a critical examination of the expertise in family court cases.

Listeners will explore CCPI's Custody Resolution Method, which utilizes data analysis to identify patterns within family court documents, and gain a deeper understanding of Dr. Childress’s Attachment-Based Parental Alienation (AB-PA) model, highlighting the need for scientifically grounded assessments and ethical scrutiny. Through the series, we also investigate the qualifications and practices of professionals like Dr. Mercer, raising questions about competence and ethics in forensic evaluations.

By addressing issues like shared persecutory delusions, pathogenic parenting, and the ethical obligations of mental health professionals, this podcast advocates for systemic reform and accurate diagnoses to protect children’s well-being. Whether you’re a parent, legal expert, or mental health professional, join us in challenging the status quo and pushing for meaningful change in how the family court system handles these sensitive issues.

Tune in to uncover the truth, promote accountability, and stand up for those affected by family court failures.

#FamilyCourtTyranny #ReformFamilyCourt #StandWithMeg #BrokenSystem #FamilyCourtReform #CreateAMovement #ParentalAlienation #ChildAbuseAwareness #CustodyDisputes #MentalHealthEthics #DrCraigChildress #FamilyLawReform

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Appeal Dismissal Errors & Alleged Court Violations: The Agnes Mecurry & Etha Jones Case Oct 15, 2024

Show notes

In this episode of Appeal Dismissal Errors & Alleged Court Violations: The Agnes Mecurry & Etha Jones Case, we delve into the recent legal developments surrounding the appeal dismissal of Agnes Mecurry and Etha Jones (Case No. 24-5786). The appellants argue that their appeal was wrongfully dismissed due to an oversight in court procedures, specifically pointing to violations of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(A)(v). We explore the key elements of their case, including claims of a fraudulent dismissal, overlooked motions, and potential RICO violations implicating Appellee Jeffrey Ward. Tune in as we unpack the intricacies of judicial procedure, alleged misconduct, and the broader implications for judicial integrity.

Whether you're a legal professional, a court reform advocate, or simply curious about how the judicial system operates, this episode provides an in-depth analysis of a case that highlights crucial issues within our court system.

#FamilyCourtTyranny #ReformFamilyCourt #StandWithMeg #BrokenSystem #FamilyCourtReform #CreateAMovement #JudicialMisconduct #LegalReform #AppealCase #CourtProcedure #JusticeSystem

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Behind the Bench: Unveiling Legal Failures in Family Court with GAL and Judges Oct 13, 2024

Show notes

In this episode of Behind the Bench, we take a deep dive into the troubling complaints filed against Guardian Ad Litem Bradly Wagner and Judge David Steel, both key figures in Johnson County, Kansas' family court. Christina Wheeler, a mother from Gardner, Kansas, shares her harrowing experience battling systemic bias and alleged misconduct in her prolonged custody battle.

We explore claims of bias, neglect of professional duties, and disregard for crucial evidence, all of which have had a significant impact on Ms. Wheeler's family, particularly the well-being of her children. Is the system broken, or are these isolated incidents? Tune in as we examine the pressing need for accountability and transparency within the family court system, and what it means for those fighting for justice.

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Inside Justice: Unpacking the U.S. Federal Court System Oct 13, 2024

Show notes

Dive deep into the backbone of American justice with this enlightening episode, where we explore the intricate workings of the U.S. Federal Court System. From the ground up, learn about the three-tiered structure of trial, appellate, and Supreme courts that keep the scales of justice balanced. We'll dissect how federal courts operate under limited jurisdiction, contrasting sharply with state courts, and delve into the critical roles and ethical standards of federal judges. Understand the meticulous appointment process, the pivotal principles of judicial ethics, and the thorough judicial procedures—from trials to appeals—that safeguard our constitutional rights. Whether it's a high-stakes federal lawsuit or a landmark constitutional debate, this episode clarifies why these courts are fundamental to interpreting and upholding the law across the nation. Join us as we decode the federal judiciary's role in ensuring justice, accountability, and the rule of law in the United States.

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Unheard Cries: The Shocking Betrayal of a Child by the System Oct 10, 2024

Show notes

In this gripping episode of our podcast, we delve deep into the harrowing story of Daisy, a four-year-old girl failed by the very institutions meant to protect her. Facing grave injustices and overlooked by New Jersey’s Division of Child Protection and Permanency, Daisy's plight exposes a systemic failure at every level. Join us as we uncover how misrepresented truths and ignored evidence led to a child being placed back into the arms of her alleged abusers. With expert interviews and a call to action, we demand accountability and change. This episode isn't just a story—it's a movement. Tune in to be part of the conversation and help us ensure that Daisy's voice is finally heard.

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Federal vs. Family Court: Tara Smith's Jurisdictional Struggle Oct 10, 2024

Show notes

Dive into the complex intersection of federal and family court jurisdictions in "Federal vs. Family Court: Tara Smith's Jurisdictional Struggle." This episode takes a closer look at Tara Smith's contentious case against Baltimore County, Maryland, et al., heard in the District of Maryland. Focusing on the pressing issues of federal court abstention and jurisdiction in child custody disputes, we unpack how the Rooker-Feldman doctrine influences Tara's legal challenges. Our expert panel discusses the court's rationale for dismissing the case as frivolous due to jurisdictional limitations and examines the serious implications of such decisions on family law outcomes. Listen as we explore how Tara's pursuit of justice navigates the nuanced legal boundaries between federal oversight and state-level family court matters, highlighting the often-overlooked struggle parents face in these judicial environments.

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Mathew's Stand: A Father's Battle in Family Court for Civil Rights Oct 10, 2024

Show notes

Tune into "Mathew's Stand," where we delve into the high-stakes legal battle of Mathew Peters v. Abby Johnson, et al., taking place in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. This episode sheds light on the critical issues surrounding family courts and civil rights, focusing on the termination of parental rights and subsequent allegations of civil rights violations under the lens of a father's fight for justice. We analyze pivotal motions, including Defendant Patrick Stevens’s controversial dismissal attempt and Plaintiff Michael Robertson's strategic move to amend the defendants list. Join us as legal experts dissect these legal proceedings and discuss their broader implications on parental rights and systemic reform in family courts. Discover how this case could mark a significant turning point for fathers and families navigating the complexities of the legal system.

Support the show

Thank you for listening to The Stand With Meg Show — Defending Parents’ Rights. Protecting Children. Giving a Voice to the Voiceless.
Join the movement at StandWithMeg.com

. Follow us on all platforms @StandWithMeg for more truth, tools, and action.

If this episode spoke to you, share it — because together, we fight for justice.

Related Podcasts