The Non-Prophets

Latest Episodes:

US Public Schools: The New Religious Battleground Aug 24, 2024

Show notes

How US Public Schools Became a New Religious Battleground
US News/Reuthers, By Liya Cui and Joseph Ax, on Aug. 7, 2024
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2024-08-07/how-us-public-schools-became-a-new-religious-battleground
In a discussion centering on the tension between religion and public education in the United States, the core theme highlights the rise of Christian nationalism and its implications for American identity. Proponents of Christian nationalism assert that to be American is to inherently be Christian, a claim often bolstered by a misinterpretation of the intentions of the nation's founders. Historical evidence suggests the founders sought a secular state with a democratic foundation that allowed individuals the freedom to practice any religion or none at all. They envisioned a country based on self-determination and the separation of church and state, a principle that is currently being challenged in places like Louisiana and Oklahoma.
In Louisiana, new school policies mandate that the Ten Commandments be prominently displayed in every classroom, a move seen as a clear violation of the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits government endorsement of religion. Meanwhile, Oklahoma's educational system has adopted a policy requiring the Bible to be taught across all grade levels, with teachers expected to integrate biblical references into their lessons. These actions are drawing criticism for infringing upon the constitutional separation of church and state and are seen as attempts to indoctrinate students with a singular religious perspective.
The conversation delves into the broader social and psychological aspects, suggesting that such policies stem from resistance to inclusivity and a desire to maintain traditional, conservative values. With a conservative majority in the Supreme Court, some lawmakers feel emboldened to push these boundaries, believing there is a possibility of getting away with such violations. The belief is that by presenting these religious teachings as fundamental to American identity, they can rally their base by portraying governmental pushback as an overreach and an infringement on religious freedom.
This discussion also touches on the potential impact of these policies on educators and students. There is concern that the emphasis on religious content will detract from the teaching of critical thinking and evidence-based knowledge. This could undermine the quality of education and the development of well-rounded, analytical thinkers. Critics argue that a government's role should be to create unity from diversity, not to impose uniformity of thought.
The conversation concludes by emphasizing the importance of maintaining a clear boundary between religion and government to prevent the criminalization of thoughts and beliefs. The current U.S. motto, "In God We Trust," is contrasted with the historical motto "E Pluribus Unum," advocating for a return to the latter as it better represents the inclusive and unifying ideals upon which the country was founded.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.33.4 featuring Scott Dickie, Aaron Jensen, Jimmy Jr. and "Eli" (Eli Slack)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Tractors are coming for “Woke” Motorcycles Aug 23, 2024

Show notes

Inside Robby Starbuck's anti-DEI war on Tractor Supply, John Deere and Harley-Davidson
US Today, by Jessica Guynn, on Aug. 2, 2024
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/08/02/robby-starbuck-harley-davidson-john-deere-dei/74608637007/
The discussion delves into the recent activism of a conservative figure who has initiated a boycott against Harley-Davidson due to their support for LGBTQ+ initiatives and other so-called "woke" causes. This individual has previously targeted companies like Tractor Supply and John Deere for similar reasons, claiming his goal is to eliminate politics from corporate America. His efforts have gained some support among conservative circles but have also been met with criticism for being divisive and potentially harmful to societal progress.
The narrative reveals a pattern of voices striving for change, where the loudest, not necessarily the fairest or most just, tends to dominate the conversation. There is a concern about the lack of counter voices promoting diversity and equality, highlighting a struggle between maintaining power and embracing a more inclusive workforce.
The conversation also touches on the broader context of white men fearing the loss of power and privilege in the face of increasing diversity. This fear seems to be driving the pushback against initiatives aimed at promoting equity and inclusion. The historical context of economic systems exploiting underpaid labor is brought up as a possible underlying motive for resisting change.
The debate suggests that there’s an implicit desire to maintain a power structure that benefits a select few at the expense of broader societal welfare. The dialogue further explores the political implications of such activism, noting that bigotry has unfortunately become intertwined with conservative politics in the United States. Despite the traditional conservative emphasis on small government, there's an acknowledgment that ensuring equal rights and opportunities might require some form of intervention.
The discussion highlights a perceived link between conservatism and authoritarianism, suggesting that those with conservative views might be more inclined towards authoritarian control, particularly in contexts involving diverse populations.
The conversation concludes with a reflection on the concept of "white standardizing," where being white is seen as the default, and other identities are viewed as deviations. This mindset perpetuates a status quo that favors certain groups, contributing to the resistance against progressive changes aimed at fostering inclusivity and diversity.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.33.3 featuring Scott Dickie, Aaron Jensen, Jimmy Jr. and "Eli" (Eli Slack)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Anti-Trans Texas Pastor Busted in Undercover Sex Sting Aug 21, 2024

Show notes

Anti-trans Texas pastor arrested after paying undercover cop for sex
The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on Aug 05, 2024
https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/anti-trans-texas-pastor-arrested
The recent discussion sheds light on the issue of hypocrisy within religious leadership, exemplified by the arrest of a senior pastor in Plano, Texas, for soliciting a prostitute. This incident, referred to as a moral failure by the church, sparks a broader conversation about what constitutes morality and the frequent dissonance between public preaching and private actions among religious figures. The dialogue delves into the inherent hypocrisy of condemning behaviors that leaders themselves secretly engage in, highlighting a pervasive problem within various societal institutions.
The conversation points to a deeper problem of hypocrisy among leaders in politics, religion, and other organizations. Despite publicly denouncing certain behaviors, these individuals often privately engage in them without being held accountable. The discussion emphasizes the need for trustworthiness as the most crucial quality in leaders, arguing that without accountability, hypocrisy thrives, eroding public trust and hindering progress. The call for honest and reliable leaders is seen as a necessary step toward addressing societal issues effectively.
The conversation further explores the endemic nature of hypocrisy within religious circles, particularly among conservative groups. This pattern is often rooted in the suppression of personal identity from a young age, leading to a disconnect between private struggles and public condemnation. The discussion also touches on the broader societal implications, questioning why these patterns are more prevalent in certain regions and what can be done to foster a more inclusive and honest environment within religious institutions.
Addressing the broader societal impact, the conversation suggests that avoiding hypocrisy requires a shift in how individuals identify themselves and approach critical thinking. By fostering a culture of skepticism and critical analysis, individuals can resist the pull of tribalism and fear-mongering that often drives hypocritical behavior. The discussion calls for a collective effort to reject leaders who promote divisive ideologies and instead support those who advocate for unity and inclusivity.
Finally, the conversation examines the intersection of hypocrisy and the conservative mindset, particularly in the context of the LGBTQ+ community. The alignment of conservative values with traditional religious doctrines often leads to the oppression of those who do not conform to expected norms. The dialogue underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing these patterns to create a more accepting and authentic society, where leaders are judged by their integrity rather than their adherence to dogmatic beliefs.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.33.2 featuring Scott Dickie, Aaron Jensen, Jimmy Jr. and "Eli" (Eli Slack)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Priest Takes Grindr to Court Over Data Leak Aug 19, 2024

Show notes

Priest sues gay hookup app Grindr over data leak
Catholic News Agency, By Daniel Payne, on Jul 26, 2024
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/258413/priest-sues-gay-hookup-app-grindr-over-data-leak
In this segment, the discussion centers around Monsignor Jeffrey Burr, a Catholic priest who faced public scrutiny and resigned from his position after being accused of using the social app Grinder for casual encounters, which conflicted with his public persona and the Church's stance on celibacy. Burr subsequently sued Grinder for allegedly mishandling his private data, claiming the app's privacy practices were fraudulent and dishonest. This case highlights broader issues of privacy and personal integrity within religious institutions, especially concerning LGBTQ+ identities and the challenges individuals face in reconciling personal and public lives.
The conversation delves into the repercussions for Monsignor Burr, noting the significant impact on his career and personal life. His outing as a result of these revelations, against his will, underscores the lack of agency individuals often have in controlling their narrative, especially within conservative religious contexts that stigmatize non-heteronormative identities.
The panelists express sympathy for Burr's plight, emphasizing the ethical implications of public exposure and its effects on personal well-being and professional reputation. Criticism is directed towards the Catholic Church's historical stance on LGBTQ+ issues, highlighting systemic oppression and the challenges faced by queer individuals within religious settings.
The discussion questions whether religious institutions like the Catholic Church should reassess their policies on celibacy and sexuality, advocating for greater acceptance and support for LGBTQ+ clergy members to live authentically without fear of reprisal or condemnation. The lawsuit against Grinder raises broader concerns about data privacy and corporate responsibility. Panelists argue for stricter regulations to protect user data from unauthorized access and exploitation by third parties, advocating for legislative measures akin to those seen in the European Union.
This case underscores the need for transparency and ethical standards in how tech companies handle sensitive user information, challenging current practices that prioritize profit over privacy rights. Overall, the segment highlights the complex interplay between personal identity, institutional norms, and legal rights, urging a reevaluation of societal attitudes towards privacy and sexuality in both religious and secular contexts.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.33.1 featuring Scott Dickie, Aaron Jensen, Jimmy Jr. and "Eli" (Eli Slack)
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Jordan Peterson Is an Opportunistic Christian Aug 17, 2024

Show notes

Behind Jordan Peterson’s ‘Biblical’ Teaching Is His Own Humanistic AgendaThe Federalist, By Larry Taunton, on May 21, 2024
https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/21/behind-jordan-petersons-biblical-teaching-is-his-own-humanistic-agenda/
Jordan Peterson's foray into biblical teachings has been characterized by a problematic fusion of superficial theology and psychological self-help. His appeal to Christian evangelicals, who are drawn to his simplified solutions to complex existential questions, signifies a worrying trend of embracing pseudo-religious rhetoric. The critique by Larry Taunton, while pointing out flaws in Peterson's approach, is not without its own issues. Taunton falls into the trap of defending an inflexible, outdated interpretation of Christianity, and from a secular viewpoint, both Peterson and Taunton contribute to a landscape of confusion—Peterson through his shallow engagement and Taunton through his dogmatic stance. The piece reveals how Peterson's pseudointellectualism and Taunton's fundamentalism ultimately hinder genuine intellectual growth, leaving their followers more confused than enlightened. The dangers of mixing pop psychology with religious fundamentalism are highlighted, as this combination leads people down a path of distorted beliefs and intellectual dishonesty. The discussion further critiques Peterson's toxic masculinity, highlighting his role in perpetuating harmful myths, especially regarding minorities and trans people. His approach, a blend of intellectualism and ego, is seen as fragile and misinformed, particularly in religious contexts where he lacks true understanding. Peterson's engagement with Christianity is marked by ambiguity, using Christian vocabulary without fully committing to the faith. This raises questions about his motivations, with some viewing his actions as a calculated move to exploit a new market, targeting Generation Z Christian youth. The critique also highlights the hypocrisy of Larry Taunton, who criticizes echo chambers while seemingly entrenched in one himself. Despite his claims, Taunton's arguments are laced with his own biases and contradictions, making the critique of Peterson appear inconsistent. The article is seen as overly long and filled with unnecessary filler, which dilutes the impact of the critique. Nevertheless, it effectively dismantles Peterson's approach to religion, exposing the flaws in his interpretation of the Bible. The debate between academics, as they clash over their respective disciplines, is portrayed as both entertaining and somewhat tragic, with Peterson stepping into an arena where he lacks true expertise. The article underscores the broader issue of intellectual dishonesty and the dangers of crossing into fields where one lacks depth and understanding.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.32.4 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Jonathan Roudabush, and Phoebe Rose
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Missouri Attorney General More Concerned with Image, not Justice Aug 16, 2024

Show notes

Missouri Attorney General Opposes Opportunity for Marcellus Williams to Establish His Innocence Before Execution Date
Death Penalty Information Center, By , on Jul 22, 2024
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/missouri-attorney-general-opposes-opportunity-for-marcellus-williams-to-establish-his-innocence-before-execution-date
Missouri is currently embroiled in a deeply troubling civil rights case involving a death row inmate who is likely innocent, as DNA evidence suggests. The state’s attorney general is relentlessly pursuing the execution of this individual, despite significant indications of his innocence and the involvement of organizations like the Innocence Project advocating for his release. The persistence of the attorney general in blocking an innocence hearing and disregarding new evidence is alarming, as it appears to prioritize conviction over justice. This disturbing situation highlights a systemic issue in Missouri, where the legal apparatus seems more focused on ensuring executions rather than correcting potential wrongful convictions. The judicial history in this case is also concerning, with the original trial judge refusing to allow DNA testing that could have exonerated the defendant. This denial of evidence suggests a justice system more interested in maintaining its decisions than in seeking the truth. The situation is exacerbated by a shocking admission from the Missouri attorney general's office that "innocence is not enough to prevent an execution," which raises profound ethical and legal questions about the state’s commitment to justice. This case underscores the broader issue of inequality in the legal system, where those without wealth or influence are often denied fair treatment. The pursuit of this execution, despite the prosecutor who originally convicted the man now seeking to vacate the conviction, reflects a rigid, unforgiving approach that places politics, and perhaps racial bias, over human life. The potential execution of an innocent man is described as state-sponsored murder, an irreversible miscarriage of justice that starkly illustrates the flaws in the death penalty system. The ongoing efforts of Missouri’s attorney general to proceed with the execution, despite overwhelming evidence of innocence and legal efforts to overturn the conviction, reveal a deep-seated problem in how justice is administered in the state. This relentless pursuit of death raises questions about the motivations behind such actions, whether political, racial, or otherwise, and whether the state's justice system is truly serving its purpose. The broader implications of this case call into question the very legitimacy of the death penalty, particularly when it is wielded in such a draconian and arguably unethical manner.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.32.3 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Jonathan Roudabush, and Phoebe Rose
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Persistent Religious fundamentalism in Schools Aug 14, 2024

Show notes

99 years after the Scopes ‘monkey trial,’ religious fundamentalism still infects our schools
Los Angeles Times, By Michael Hiltzik, on July 26, 2024
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-07-26/99-years-after-the-scopes-monkey-trial-religious-fundamentalism-still-infects-our-schools
Nearly a century ago, a significant trial unfolded in Tennessee, where the clash between religious fundamentalism and modern education took center stage. This trial, known as the Scopes Trial, ignited a debate that still reverberates today, pitting creationism and intelligent design against scientific understanding in schools. Although the defendant, John Scopes, lost the trial, the broader victory went to science. However, in the contemporary landscape, movements across the United States and abroad continue to push for religious doctrines to infiltrate educational curricula, with some states fighting in courts to uphold restrictive laws that challenge academic freedom.
The Scopes Trial was rooted in a gesture of appeasement. The Tennessee legislature passed a bill prohibiting the teaching of evolution as a symbolic concession to a lay preacher who had otherwise failed to pass any significant legislation. This bill, initially seen as harmless, escalated into a cultural battleground once it was signed into law. The media, both then and now, played a pivotal role in sensationalizing the trial, creating a narrative that often overshadowed the reality. The trial was less about the actual legalities and more about the larger cultural war over how society should balance religious beliefs with scientific progress.
Bad legislation often leads to broader societal issues, including the erosion of public trust in legal and governmental institutions. When laws are poorly conceived or enforced, they invite ridicule and diminish the legitimacy of the legal system. The Scopes Trial is a prime example of how symbolic gestures in legislation can have far-reaching and unintended consequences. The case's outcome hinged on technicalities, with the judge overstepping his authority, leading to a conviction that was later overturned. This maneuver may have been a deliberate attempt to avoid a substantive appeal, which could have set a more significant legal precedent.
The struggle between science and religious dogma in education has a long and ongoing history. Even after the Scopes Trial, states like Alabama and Missouri continued to grapple with similar legal battles, with courts consistently ruling against the inclusion of creationism and intelligent design in public school curricula. These cases highlight the persistent efforts to challenge scientific education in favor of religious teachings, a battle that has spanned decades and remains unresolved.
The trial's media coverage, both during the event and in subsequent portrayals, often exaggerated and distorted the facts, turning the proceedings into a spectacle rather than an accurate reflection of the issues at stake. Films and television adaptations have further muddied the waters, prioritizing entertainment over historical accuracy. This trend of sensationalizing history for media consumption has contributed to the ongoing misunderstanding of the trial's significance and its implications for the relationship between religion and education.
The town where the Scopes Trial took place was largely apathetic about the legal battle, seeing it more as a financial opportunity than a moral crusade. The influx of press and visitors brought by the trial provided a much-needed economic boost to the community. However, the case itself was a poor test of the broader issues, as the local population was not particularly invested in the outcome. Despite this, the trial has become emblematic of the enduring conflict between scientific inquiry and religious belief, a conflict that continues to shape educational policies and public discourse in the United States and beyond.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.32.2 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Jonathan Roudabush, and Phoebe Rose
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Superintendent Walters' Bible Mandate Standoff Aug 12, 2024

Show notes

Oklahoma Bible mandate: Ryan Walters threatens 'rogue' districts
The Oklahoman, By M. Scott Carter Murray Evans, on July 31, 2024
https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news/education/2024/07/31/oklahoma-bible-in-schools-ryan-walters-threatens-rogue-districts/74599357007/
Oklahoma's State School Superintendent has stirred controversy again by mandating the teaching of the Bible in public school classrooms, threatening repercussions for districts that don't comply. Although legal scholars widely regard this move as unconstitutional, the Superintendent remains resolute, seemingly unbothered by potential legal challenges. Critics argue that his accusations against school districts for being "rogue" are baseless, pointing out that local control over curriculum is enshrined in Oklahoma law. Despite this, the Superintendent continues to push his agenda, possibly for political gain rather than genuine educational reform. This situation echoes past instances where political figures attempted to impose religious mandates, reminiscent of Alabama's Roy Moore and his failed efforts to install a Ten Commandments monument. The Superintendent's actions are viewed by some as a distraction from more pressing issues, particularly the poor state of Oklahoma's education system, which ranks among the lowest in the nation. Rather than addressing these deep-rooted problems, the focus has shifted to controversial religious initiatives, leaving the state's educational challenges unaddressed. Furthermore, the Superintendent's policies may be seen as part of a broader effort to suppress minority cultures, especially in areas bordering indigenous territories. This has sparked concerns about the imposition of a singular religious ideology at the expense of cultural diversity and educational quality. Critics fear that this move, under the guise of improving educational outcomes, is actually a politically motivated attempt to rally specific voter bases while ignoring the true needs of Oklahoma's students and educators.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.32.1 featuring Kelley Laughlin, Jonathan Roudabush, and Phoebe Rose
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Rusk ISD praying themselves into legal hot water? Aug 10, 2024

Show notes

A Texas public school superintendent won't stop promoting Christianity at workThe Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on Jul 24, 2024
https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/a-texas-public-school-superintendent
In the latest segment on religious issues in public schools, the focus turns to Rusk Independent School District (ISD) Superintendent Gray Burton and his controversial approach to prayer in school settings. The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) has been in a contentious battle with Burton, who has replaced traditional moments of silence with student-led prayers, a move deemed unconstitutional by the FFRF. Their concern extends to several specific incidents, including a prayer broadcast over the loudspeaker at a football game and a Facebook post from the district favoring Christian applicants for jobs.
Burton’s response to these criticisms has been marked by an apparent misunderstanding of the law. He has likened his district’s religious endorsements to preferences in music genres, a comparison criticized for its inaccuracy. The FFRF argues that promoting a specific religion or showing favoritism based on religious beliefs violates constitutional protections. Despite these clear guidelines, Burton seems determined to continue his practices, revealing a troubling mix of religious fervor and legal ignorance.
The discussion then delves into Burton’s possible motivations. It is suggested that his actions stem from a desire to impose Christian values universally, reflecting a form of "Christo-fascism." This term characterizes the merging of religious ideology with authoritarian practices, suggesting that Burton’s efforts might be driven by a need to assert his beliefs despite their potential illegality. His dismissive responses to legal challenges and the FFRF’s warnings reveal a deeper issue of entitlement and a lack of respect for constitutional boundaries.
The conversation touches on the possible ramifications of Burton’s actions, speculating whether his disregard for the law will lead to a courtroom showdown. The FFRF’s detailed letters highlight specific legal violations, such as endorsing religious messages and selecting students based on religious criteria. The discussion concludes with a hopeful note that the legal system will ultimately correct these missteps, either through regulatory bodies or potentially the Supreme Court, although the latter seems less likely given the current judicial climate.
In summary, Superintendent Gray Burton’s actions in Rusk ISD exemplify a broader clash between religious zeal and constitutional adherence. His persistent promotion of Christian values in public school settings, despite legal warnings, underscores ongoing tensions over the separation of church and state in American education.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.31.4 featuring Infidel64, Cindy Plaza, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Drag Performance at Olympics gets a Rise Aug 09, 2024

Show notes

Olympics opening ceremony sparks outrage with drag queens parodying Last Supper: 'Gone completely woke'
Fox News, By Alexander Hall, on July 26, 2024
https://www.foxnews.com/media/olympics-opening-ceremony-sparks-outrage-drag-queens-parodying-last-supper-gone-completely-woke
The Paris 2024 Olympics opening ceremony ignited a storm of controversy, primarily due to a performance that some viewers misinterpreted as a parody of the Last Supper rather than an homage to Greek mythology. This artistic display, featuring drag queens and various historical figures, aimed to celebrate the rich cultural and religious tapestry that is a fundamental aspect of the Olympic Games' history. Despite its intentions to honor the ancient gods of Mount Olympus, the performance was perceived by some Christians as a direct affront to their faith.
The controversy highlights a deep-seated tension between traditional religious beliefs and modern interpretations of cultural expressions. Critics, particularly from American political spheres, labeled the performance as indicative of "cultural rot," suggesting that deviation from Christian norms represents a decline in Western civilization. This criticism echoes historical patterns where specific religious groups have been blamed for societal decline, reflecting a recurring theme of attributing moral and cultural decay to perceived threats against religious orthodoxy.
The discussion extends to the broader debate on how religion influences perceptions of cultural and artistic expression. Some argue that the backlash reveals a discomfort with the depiction of non-Christian gods, which is seen as a violation of Christian commandments to honor no other gods. This response underscores a broader issue of religious exclusivity and the challenges of integrating diverse beliefs within a globalized cultural framework.
The conversation also touches on the nature of respect and the fragility of faith. One perspective suggests that if a particular artistic expression poses an existential threat to one's beliefs, it may reflect a deeper insecurity about the robustness of those beliefs. The assertion is that genuine respect involves recognizing and accepting differing views without perceiving them as personal attacks. This notion aligns with the idea that respect should extend to people, not necessarily to their ideas, especially when those ideas are critiqued or challenged.
The episode reveals a broader issue within contemporary discourse: the tendency of some groups to view any deviation from their beliefs as a personal affront. This perspective often manifests in attempts to silence or discredit differing viewpoints rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. The controversy surrounding the Paris 2024 opening ceremony serves as a microcosm of these larger cultural and religious dynamics, reflecting ongoing debates about the role of religion in public life and the limits of artistic expression.
The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.31.3 featuring Infidel64, Cindy Plaza, Eli Slack and Kelley Laughlin
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected