Skydoge watched every second of the second impeachment of Donald Trump -- foregone conclusions be damned! He must love the pain!
Skydoge wishes to state his bias upfront but hopes you’d hear him out, even if you happen to disagree. He watched with rapt attention as an obviously guilty man was exonerated for a second time by a system that seems to refuse, or is otherwise incapable, of holding people in power accountable for their egregious behavior.
Seeing the impeachment process applied to the same President twice, in very different ways -- only to arrive at the same conclusion -- has left Skydoge’s head spinning. He is now utterly convinced that impeachment is an ineffective remedy for the removal of civil officers who act in clear violation of their oath of office. This episode is part one of a two-part series.
In today’s episode, Skydoge lays the groundwork for impeaching impeachment -- consulting the relevant clauses in the constitution, case law, and the historical development of US criminal law.
He attempts to draw a clear distinction between the political -- not to be confused with partisan -- process of impeachment and a criminal proceeding in a court of law.
Part two -- which promises a breakdown of the specific arguments of Trump’s second impeachment trial -- is coming soon! Doesn’t that sound fun?!
Subscribe to The Liberal Bubble, new episodes popping up every Tuesday.