TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Daily News

    The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show – iHeartPodcasts

    The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.

    Advertise

    Copyright: 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    The Karol Markowicz Show: Brittany Hughes: The Disturbing Culture Behind the Lindsay Clancy Reaction Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Conservative commentator and podcaster Brittany Hughes joins Karol Markowicz to discuss motherhood, faith, the culture wars, and what she sees as troubling changes taking place in American society.

    Hughes shares her journey from small-town newspaper reporter to political journalism and digital media, and explains why becoming a wife and mother shifted her focus toward cultural issues affecting families and children. She and Karol also discuss how women can pursue meaningful careers while prioritizing family — and why “having it all” doesn't necessarily mean having everything at the same time.

    Then, the conversation turns to the Lindsay Clancy trial and the reaction it has generated online. Hughes and Karol examine why some women have publicly identified with or defended Clancy, the difference between acknowledging the difficulties of motherhood and romanticizing extreme behavior, and what the reaction may reveal about attitudes toward motherhood, mental health, and victimhood in the social-media era.

    Hughes also sounds the alarm over growing sympathy for socialism and communism among younger Americans, while expressing optimism about the energy she sees among young conservatives. She explains why she believes Americans may need to see some of these political ideas fail in practice before attitudes begin to change.

    Finally, Hughes shares the principle she believes can most profoundly improve a person's life: surrendering to Jesus Christ, finding joy through faith, and pursuing a purpose greater than temporary happiness.

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Daily Review with Clay and Buck - Sep 2 2026 Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    A Breakdown of the state of the economy and its impact on the upcoming midterm elections. Drawing from polling data discussed at a Tennessee political event featuring gubernatorial candidate Marsha Blackburn, Travis argued that voters remain overwhelmingly focused on affordability, inflation, and the rising cost of living. The hosts contended that economic concerns, including grocery prices and household expenses, remain the dominant issue for voters across the country. They framed the election environment as a referendum on economic conditions and debated how both parties are attempting to position themselves on inflation, consumer costs, and economic recovery. Battleground states such as Michigan and California were highlighted as examples of differing state-level political dynamics heading into the midterms.


    The hosts also spent significant time discussing a recent Wall Street Journal profile of the Clay and Buck program. Beyond some lighthearted discussion about photographs used in the feature, the conversation turned toward broader media industry trends. Travis and Sexton examined the continuing evolution of talk radio, podcasts, livestreaming, and digital media. They argued that live radio retains advantages over recorded podcasts because of its ability to respond instantly to breaking news and current events. They also discussed the changing podcast landscape, the growth of conspiracy-driven content online, audience trust, and the importance of maintaining credibility in political commentary and news analysis.


    Clay and Buck discuss Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the future of the Democrat Party. Travis and Sexton analyzed a widely circulated TMZ interview in which AOC discussed dating across political lines, family planning, and the costs associated with having children. The hosts argued that AOC has become increasingly effective at presenting herself as relatable and authentic to voters. They suggested that her ability to communicate everyday concerns, particularly affordability, housing costs, healthcare expenses, and family economics, could make her a formidable national political figure.


    The conversation evolved into a broader assessment of potential Democratic presidential contenders for 2028. The hosts compared AOC's political strengths to those of Kamala Harris and other possible Democratic candidates, debating whether AOC could emerge as a future nominee or vice-presidential pick. They argued that modern campaigns are increasingly driven by personal connection, relatability, social media influence, and perceived authenticity rather than traditional policy expertise. The hosts suggested that AOC's communication style may resonate particularly strongly with younger voters, college-educated women, millennials, and voters concerned about affordability and quality-of-life issues.


    The guys dive into the growing controversy surrounding Flock cameras, automated license plate reader technology increasingly used by law enforcement agencies across the country. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton explored both the advantages and concerns associated with the technology, framing it as a legitimate policy debate with reasonable arguments on both sides. The hosts discussed how Flock cameras assist police investigations, track stolen vehicles, and help locate suspects in violent crimes, while also acknowledging concerns about government overreach, privacy rights, data retention, and potential abuse by future administrations. They referenced opposition voiced by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, particularly his concerns that similar technologies could have been exploited during COVID-era lockdowns to monitor citizens’ movements. Throughout the discussion, the hosts repeatedly returned to Fourth Amendment questions involving unreasonable searches and how courts may ultimately define constitutional limits on surveillance technology.


    The conversation expanded into a broader examination of privacy in the digital age. Travis argued that smartphones already provide government agencies and technology companies with extensive location data and personal information, often exceeding what Flock cameras collect. Both hosts noted that most Americans are routinely captured on surveillance cameras in public spaces, stores, banks, and businesses, raising questions about where society should draw the line between public safety and individual privacy. They emphasized the importance of legal guardrails and oversight rather than outright bans, while recognizing concerns among conservatives who fear the technology could eventually be used to restrict personal freedoms.


    The most extensive discussion in Hour 3 centered on the Lindsey Clancy case, where jury deliberations remained deadlocked. The hosts analyzed repeated instructions from the judge directing jurors to continue deliberating despite their inability to reach a unanimous verdict. Travis speculated about possible divisions within the jury and examined the broader societal reaction to the case, particularly arguments surrounding postpartum depression, mental illness, hormonal influences, and criminal accountability. Both hosts expressed concern that excusing violent crimes based on psychological or hormonal factors could undermine the principle of personal responsibility that serves as a foundation of criminal law.


    The conversation evolved into a deeper examination of the insanity defense, criminal culpability, and the nature of evil. Sexton referenced historical legal standards dating back to 19th-century English common law and discussed how courts determine whether defendants understood the nature of their actions or knew right from wrong at the time crimes were committed. The hosts reviewed the legal distinction between a criminal act and criminal intent, debated the limits of psychological explanations for violent behavior, and questioned whether mental illness should absolve individuals of responsibility for especially heinous crimes. They also discussed research into psychopathy, violent offenders, and forensic psychiatry, arguing that society must be cautious about expanding legal defenses that reduce individual accountability for serious criminal conduct.


    The hosts further connected the Clancy case to broader cultural debates about crime, personal responsibility, and equal application of justice. They compared arguments being made in her defense to how society treats other forms of violent criminal behavior, discussing whether hormonal, psychological, or neurological explanations should reduce legal culpability. The discussion emphasized their concern that expanding such defenses could create unintended consequences for future criminal prosecutions and public perceptions of justice.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:

    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/

    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck

    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Hour 1 - Don't Underestimate AOC Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Hour 1 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show focused heavily on breaking political news, the economic concerns driving the 2026 midterm elections, Democrat Party strategy, and the rising national profile of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). The hosts also discussed media trends, talk radio's influence, and their growing audience presence as the election season intensifies.

    The hour opened with discussion of the criminal case surrounding the alleged killer of Charlie Kirk. Clay Travis reported that Tyler Robinson had been charged with seven felony counts and entered a not guilty plea. The hosts argued that the upcoming televised trial will draw national attention and predicted that evidence presented in court will play a major role in settling ongoing public debate surrounding the case. They also briefly updated listeners on the still-deadlocked jury deliberations in the high-profile Lindsey Clancy case, noting that no verdict had yet been reached.

    A major topic throughout Hour 1 was the state of the economy and its impact on the upcoming midterm elections. Drawing from polling data discussed at a Tennessee political event featuring gubernatorial candidate Marsha Blackburn, Travis argued that voters remain overwhelmingly focused on affordability, inflation, and the rising cost of living. The hosts contended that economic concerns, including grocery prices and household expenses, remain the dominant issue for voters across the country. They framed the election environment as a referendum on economic conditions and debated how both parties are attempting to position themselves on inflation, consumer costs, and economic recovery. Battleground states such as Michigan and California were highlighted as examples of differing state-level political dynamics heading into the midterms.

    The hosts also spent significant time discussing a recent Wall Street Journal profile of the Clay and Buck program. Beyond some lighthearted discussion about photographs used in the feature, the conversation turned toward broader media industry trends. Travis and Sexton examined the continuing evolution of talk radio, podcasts, livestreaming, and digital media. They argued that live radio retains advantages over recorded podcasts because of its ability to respond instantly to breaking news and current events. They also discussed the changing podcast landscape, the growth of conspiracy-driven content online, audience trust, and the importance of maintaining credibility in political commentary and news analysis.

    Another segment focused on the show's continued expansion, including the announcement of a new radio affiliate in Las Vegas. The hosts discussed the growth of their national audience, cross-platform digital engagement, podcast network performance, and the broader reach of conservative media ahead of a highly competitive election cycle.

    The most extensive political discussion of Hour 1 centered on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the future of the Democrat Party. Travis and Sexton analyzed a widely circulated TMZ interview in which AOC discussed dating across political lines, family planning, and the costs associated with having children. The hosts argued that AOC has become increasingly effective at presenting herself as relatable and authentic to voters. They suggested that her ability to communicate everyday concerns, particularly affordability, housing costs, healthcare expenses, and family economics, could make her a formidable national political figure.

    The conversation evolved into a broader assessment of potential Democratic presidential contenders for 2028. The hosts compared AOC's political strengths to those of Kamala Harris and other possible Democratic candidates, debating whether AOC could emerge as a future nominee or vice-presidential pick. They argued that modern campaigns are increasingly driven by personal connection, relatability, social media influence, and perceived authenticity rather than traditional policy expertise. The hosts suggested that AOC's communication style may resonate particularly strongly with younger voters, college-educated women, millennials, and voters concerned about affordability and quality-of-life issues.

    The hour concluded with listener reaction to the AOC discussion. A caller challenged the idea that the TMZ exchange demonstrated political strength, while the hosts countered that modern political success depends less on formal interviews and more on creating authentic moments that connect with voters. They compared AOC's appeal to skills previously demonstrated by successful national politicians and argued that personality, relatability, and voter connection will continue to shape future elections.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:

    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/

    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck

    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Hour 2 - The Case for Flock Cameras Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Hour 2 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show featured an in-depth discussion of government surveillance, public safety technology, constitutional rights, gun ownership trends, crime, self-defense, and the political implications of personal freedom in modern America. The conversation also touched on the 2026 midterm election environment, state-level governance, and reaction to continuing legal and cultural debates that are shaping the national conversation.

    A major focus of Hour 2 was the growing controversy surrounding Flock cameras, automated license plate reader technology increasingly used by law enforcement agencies across the country. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton explored both the advantages and concerns associated with the technology, framing it as a legitimate policy debate with reasonable arguments on both sides. The hosts discussed how Flock cameras assist police investigations, track stolen vehicles, and help locate suspects in violent crimes, while also acknowledging concerns about government overreach, privacy rights, data retention, and potential abuse by future administrations. They referenced opposition voiced by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, particularly his concerns that similar technologies could have been exploited during COVID-era lockdowns to monitor citizens’ movements. Throughout the discussion, the hosts repeatedly returned to Fourth Amendment questions involving unreasonable searches and how courts may ultimately define constitutional limits on surveillance technology.

    The conversation expanded into a broader examination of privacy in the digital age. Travis argued that smartphones already provide government agencies and technology companies with extensive location data and personal information, often exceeding what Flock cameras collect. Both hosts noted that most Americans are routinely captured on surveillance cameras in public spaces, stores, banks, and businesses, raising questions about where society should draw the line between public safety and individual privacy. They emphasized the importance of legal guardrails and oversight rather than outright bans, while recognizing concerns among conservatives who fear the technology could eventually be used to restrict personal freedoms.

    The hosts also discussed the political divide between red states and blue states regarding technology regulation, personal liberties, and government authority. Drawing lessons from the COVID pandemic, Travis argued that Americans increasingly evaluate states based on how they balance personal freedom and government power. Tennessee, Florida, and Texas were highlighted as examples of states where the hosts believe citizens have greater trust in government decision-making compared to heavily Democratic jurisdictions.

    Another significant segment centered on crime, public safety, and gun ownership in America. Travis highlighted recent statistics showing record numbers of first-time gun buyers, particularly among women, Black Americans, and Hispanic Americans. The hosts discussed how the motivations for firearm ownership have shifted from hunting and recreation toward personal protection and self-defense. They argued that rising awareness of crime, widespread video evidence of violent incidents shared on social media, and concerns about public safety have influenced many Americans to purchase firearms and obtain concealed carry permits.

    The discussion then turned to several high-profile violent crime examples, including a fatal stabbing in Times Square. The hosts used the incident to debate gun-free zones, self-defense rights, police response, and public safety policy. They argued that law-abiding citizens are often unable to immediately protect themselves in jurisdictions with strict firearm restrictions and suggested that legal concealed carry can serve as an important deterrent against violent attackers. The conversation also addressed broader questions about criminal justice, repeat offenders, mental illness, police use of force, and the challenges facing large urban areas.

    The hosts further noted how historical support for gun control has evolved in recent years. They pointed to growing firearm ownership among demographics that traditionally have been less likely to own guns, including women and Jewish Americans. Discussion included how events such as civil unrest, rising concerns about public safety, and antisemitic violence have changed attitudes surrounding personal security and Second Amendment rights.

    Hour 2 also featured lighter political commentary involving President Donald Trump’s continued use of unconventional political messaging. The hosts joked about recent efforts to rename geographic landmarks, including references to the “Gulf of America,” “Lake America,” and a proposed “Strait of Trump,” viewing such moves as examples of Trump’s enduring ability to dominate public attention and political conversations.

    The final portion of the hour included listener calls addressing both the Lindsey Clancy case and the hosts’ ongoing analysis of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s political future. One caller questioned potential financial and legal consequences if Clancy were ever to profit from books or media appearances tied to her case, prompting a discussion of wrongful-death lawsuits, civil liability, and First Amendment considerations. Another listener argued that an eventual presidential debate featuring AOC against Republican figures such as JD Vance or Marco Rubio would become a major national political event and must-watch television.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:

    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/

    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck

    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Hour 3 - Responsibility Still Matters Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Hour 3 of the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show centered on two major themes: the ongoing national debate over surveillance technology and privacy rights, and extensive analysis of the deadlocked jury in the high-profile Lindsey Clancy murder trial. The hosts also discussed criminal responsibility, the insanity defense, constitutional questions surrounding law enforcement technology, President Donald Trump's latest headline-grabbing naming initiatives, and audience reaction to both the program's political discussions and a recent Wall Street Journal profile of the show.


    A substantial portion of Hour 3 was devoted to the controversy surrounding Flock cameras, automated license plate recognition systems increasingly used by police departments across the country. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton debated the balance between public safety and privacy, focusing on concerns raised by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis regarding the potential misuse of surveillance technology. The hosts acknowledged fears that such systems could be exploited by governments during future emergencies, similar to COVID-era restrictions, while arguing that the cameras can provide critical tools for solving crimes, locating missing children, tracking suspects, and reducing violent crime. The discussion examined how technological advances intersect with the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures and whether proper legal guardrails can prevent abuse while still allowing law enforcement access to valuable investigative tools.


    The conversation expanded into a broader examination of digital privacy and modern surveillance. Travis argued that smartphones already generate enormous amounts of personal location data, often providing far more detailed information than license plate readers. Both hosts noted that Americans are routinely recorded by security cameras in public spaces, businesses, banks, and retail stores, raising questions about how expectations of privacy have evolved in a technology-driven society. They discussed the distinction between legitimate crime-fighting tools and government overreach while emphasizing that courts will ultimately determine how these technologies interact with constitutional protections.


    The hosts also explored how political culture and trust in government differ across states. They argued that many Americans increasingly evaluate public policy through the lens of red-state versus blue-state governance, particularly following the COVID pandemic. Tennessee, Florida, and other Republican-led states were presented as examples where residents may feel more confident that surveillance technologies would be used primarily for public safety rather than broader governmental control. Conversely, the hosts suggested that concerns about government monitoring are often magnified in cities and states where citizens have less trust in political leadership.


    Another lighter political segment focused on President Donald Trump's continued ability to dominate public conversation through unconventional messaging. Travis and Sexton joked about proposed geographic renamings, including references to the "Gulf of America," "Lake America," and a newly suggested "Strait of Trump" as a replacement for the Strait of Hormuz. The hosts framed these efforts as examples of Trump's ongoing talent for driving media coverage, public debate, and political attention through branding and symbolism.


    The most extensive discussion in Hour 3 centered on the Lindsey Clancy case, where jury deliberations remained deadlocked. The hosts analyzed repeated instructions from the judge directing jurors to continue deliberating despite their inability to reach a unanimous verdict. Travis speculated about possible divisions within the jury and examined the broader societal reaction to the case, particularly arguments surrounding postpartum depression, mental illness, hormonal influences, and criminal accountability. Both hosts expressed concern that excusing violent crimes based on psychological or hormonal factors could undermine the principle of personal responsibility that serves as a foundation of criminal law.


    The conversation evolved into a deeper examination of the insanity defense, criminal culpability, and the nature of evil. Sexton referenced historical legal standards dating back to 19th-century English common law and discussed how courts determine whether defendants understood the nature of their actions or knew right from wrong at the time crimes were committed. The hosts reviewed the legal distinction between a criminal act and criminal intent, debated the limits of psychological explanations for violent behavior, and questioned whether mental illness should absolve individuals of responsibility for especially heinous crimes. They also discussed research into psychopathy, violent offenders, and forensic psychiatry, arguing that society must be cautious about expanding legal defenses that reduce individual accountability for serious criminal conduct.


    The hosts further connected the Clancy case to broader cultural debates about crime, personal responsibility, and equal application of justice. They compared arguments being made in her defense to how society treats other forms of violent criminal behavior, discussing whether hormonal, psychological, or neurological explanations should reduce legal culpability. The discussion emphasized their concern that expanding such defenses could create unintended consequences for future criminal prosecutions and public perceptions of justice.


    As the hour concluded, listeners weighed in on the Flock camera debate, with one caller arguing that public opposition to surveillance technology represents democracy in action. The hosts responded by reiterating their view that regulation of technology may be preferable to outright bans. The program ended on a lighter note with humorous listener reactions to a recent Wall Street Journal profile of the show, including playful commentary on the photographs of Clay Travis and Buck Sexton that accompanied the article.

    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8

    For the latest updates from Clay & Buck, visit our website https://www.clayandbuck.com/

    Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton:

    X - https://x.com/clayandbuck

    FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/

    IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/

    YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck

    TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    It's a Numbers Game: Jasmine Crockett REFUSES to Back Talarico as Texas Race Tightens Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Jasmine Crockett isn't falling in line behind James Talarico — and Ryan Girdusky explains why that could matter in an increasingly competitive Texas Senate race.

    On this episode of It’s a Numbers Game with Ryan Girdusky, Ryan breaks down the growing tensions inside both parties in Texas. Crockett is refusing to campaign for Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico after their bitter primary battle, while Republican Sen. John Cornyn isn't rushing to help Ken Paxton either.

    Ryan examines the voters both former candidates could influence, the controversial past comments now being used against Talarico, and why a relatively small group of Trump voters could ultimately determine whether Paxton wins the Senate seat.

    Plus, Ryan turns to Michigan, where Abdul El-Sayed faces new scrutiny as his race against Republican Mike Rogers remains highly competitive. Ryan analyzes the importance of black and Jewish voters, Democratic defections and Van Jones' criticism of El-Sayed.

    RIP Wendell Berry

    EMAIL RYAN

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    The Tudor Dixon Podcast: Can Conservatives Win Back Gen Z? Evita Duffy Explains Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Tudor Dixon is joined by Evita Duffy Alfonso for a wide-ranging conversation about patriotism, America’s universities, the rise of socialism among Gen Z and what conservatives must do to win over the next generation.

    Evita shares stories from her family’s Great American Road Trip and explains why seeing America firsthand can help young people reconnect with the country’s history, culture and values. She also opens up about her experience as a conservative student at the University of Chicago and discusses the challenges conservative and Christian families face when deciding where to send their children to college.

    Tudor and Evita examine ideological conformity on college campuses, whether conservatives should fight to reclaim institutions like Harvard and Yale rather than abandon them, and how universities could be held accountable through federal funding and tax policy.

    Plus, Evita discusses why socialism is gaining traction with some young Americans struggling with housing costs, groceries and an increasingly elusive American Dream—and argues that Republicans need to offer tangible economic solutions rather than simply dismissing those frustrations.

    They also discuss her husband Michael Alfonso’s run for Congress in Wisconsin, the emerging Gen Z conservative movement and why the battle for America’s next generation may reshape the future of both political parties.

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    David Rutherford Show: A Green Beret's Darkest Night in Baghdad — and What Saved Him | Tyr Symank Sep 02, 2026
    Show notes

    Retired Special Forces Sergeant Major Tyr Symank spent 31 years in uniform and in high-threat contract work — Green Beret, combat medic, Blackwater, DSS. I met him last spring and knew within one conversation that he understood something about peace that most warriors never find. This week he tells the whole story, including the night that nearly took him and the work that brought him back.

    ✅ Sponsors: ☕️ Black Rifle Coffee: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/

    🏫 Get coaching by David Rutherford: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/

    What you'll hear:

    • Tyr breaks down why he calls his career "addiction disguised as selfless service"

    • The 2007 moment — a car backfire — that told him PTSD was real

    • Why refusing help to "keep the edge" is a fallacy that dulls the blade

    • The night in Baghdad, the three things that stopped him, and four months of full-time therapy

    • The five words that rebuilt him: "You have to forgive yourself"

    • David and Tyr make the case for mandatory therapy for senior military leaders

    • Resources every struggling vet should know: dial 988 press 1, All Secure Foundation, and Beyond the Battlefield

    Tyr Symank served across the 1st Cavalry Horse Detachment, 19th Special Forces Group, and multiple government agencies, retiring as a sergeant major. He now helps veterans navigate the VA claims process with Xterra Health.

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Nation States: A White House Witness to 9/11, 25 Years Later Sep 01, 2026
    Show notes

    Twenty-five years after September 11, 2001, Steve Yates shares a firsthand account from inside the White House complex as America came under attack. Drawing on his experience serving on the vice president’s national security staff, he reflects on the confusion, evacuation, continuity of government, and leadership lessons that emerged in the hours and days that followed. More importantly, he examines what those events still teach America in 2026 about vigilance, resilience, and national security. Listen, share with the next generation, and help preserve the lessons that history can teach before memory fades. Follow Nation States with Yates for clear, common-sense insights where Steve Yates serves as your personal national security advisor, breaking down world events in ways that matter to Main Street, not just Washington. Connect with the show at Feedback@NationStatesYates.com and follow on X @NSWithYates.

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    The Truth with Lisa Boothe: Paul Mauro Breaks Down the Lindsay Clancy Case: Guilty Verdict or Hung Jury? Sep 01, 2026
    Show notes

    Fox News contributor, former NYPD inspector, opsdesk.org founder Paul Mauro joins Lisa Boothe for a deep dive into two of the nation’s most closely watched criminal cases.

    Mauro breaks down the Lindsay Clancy trial as the jury deliberates her fate, examining the prosecution’s evidence, the insanity defense, the timeline surrounding the deaths of her three children, and why he believes the facts point toward planning and deliberate action. He also explains what the lengthy deliberations could mean — and why a hung jury remains a real possibility.

    Lisa and Paul also discuss the growing role of emotion and mental health narratives in the courtroom, how social media could influence the way younger jurors view cases, and the broader cultural implications surrounding the Clancy trial.

    Plus, Mauro analyzes the latest legal fight involving Luigi Mangione, including the double-jeopardy argument surrounding federal and New York charges, what Mangione could face at sentencing, and why separate charges in Pennsylvania could create even more legal jeopardy.

    It’s a wide-ranging conversation about criminal justice, the insanity defense, jury psychology, and two cases that could have lasting legal consequences.

    Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.


    Previous 1 27 28 29 30 31 828 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Global News Podcast

    1

    Global News Podcast Daily News
    WSJ What’s News – The Wall Street Journal

    2

    WSJ What’s News – The Wall Street Journal Business
    The Gist

    3

    The Gist Daily News
    Marketplace Morning Report

    4

    Marketplace Morning Report Business
    The Daily

    5

    The Daily Daily News
    The Rachel Maddow Show

    6

    The Rachel Maddow Show Daily News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights