TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Arts

    The Book Maven: A Literary Revue

    A weekly podcast hosted by award-winning host and producer Bethanne Patrick, including themed book recommendations, interviews with great authors, and literary sizzle.

    thebookmavenunbound.substack.com

    Advertise

    Copyright: © 2024

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Mystery and Identity: Exploring 'The Last Ferry Out' with Andrea Bartz Aug 12, 2025
    Show notes

    Season 3 of the Book Maven continues! This episode, Bethanne talks to Andrea Bartz, author of The Last Ferry Out, to discuss the influence of Andrea's Hungarian roots on the protagonist's heritage. Andrea shares insights on capturing complex LGBTQIA relationships authentically within thriller novels and reflects on the unique dynamics of immigrant families and the pressures faced by first-generation Americans.

    Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.

    The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, and produced by Jordan Aaron and Lauren Stack.


    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thebookmavenunbound.substack.com

    Plotters and Pantsers with Jennifer Haigh Jul 22, 2025
    Show notes

    Welcome to season 3 of the Book Maven! This episode, Bethanne talks to Jennifer Haigh, author of Rabbit Moon, to discuss her approach to her writing practice.

    Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.

    The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, and produced by Jordan Aaron and Lauren Stack.


    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thebookmavenunbound.substack.com

    How To Write About Sex with Carmen Maria Machado Apr 18, 2025
    Show notes

    We’ve made it to the end of season two! To close things out, Bethanne sits down with Carmen Maria Machado, author of In the Dream House, to discuss how she got into writing erotica, the politics of writing about sex, and navigating creative work in a repressive environment. Join us in conversation as Carmen talks about her first forays into writing.Bethanne puts the spotlight on Middlemarch in this week’s Canon or Can It. Will the classic novel survive Bethanne’s critical scrutiny? Tune in to find out.Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists. Titles include: House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski, Imagine Me Gone by Adam Haslett, Dept. of Speculation by Jenny Offill, A Girl Is a Half-Formed Thing by Eimear McBride, Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders, and Autumn by Ali Smith.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned:In the Dream House – Carmen Maria MachadoFlowers in the Attic – V.C. AndrewsTo the Finland Station – Edmund WilsonFuck: An Irreverent History of the F-Word – Rufus LodgeOrbital – Samantha HarveyMiddlemarch – George EliotHouse of Leaves – Mark Z. DanielewskiImagine Me Gone – Adam HaslettDept. of Speculation – Jenny OffillA Girl Is a Half-Formed Thing – Eimear McBrideLincoln in the Bardo – George SaundersAutumn – Ali SmithEpisode Transcript:Bethanne: Welcome to season two of the Book Maven: A Literary Revue. And as you might be able to tell today, I the Book Maven, Bethanne, have allergies. And so my voice has dropped about an octave. Thank you, dear listeners, for putting up with it. I promise we have a really great show. As you know, this season we're talking to leading authors, digging into the classics to decide which ones should stay in the literary cannon, and I'm also recommending some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all of that and more in this episode. And first this week I talked to Carmen Maria Machado, author of In The Dream House, and we talked about how she got into writing erotica, the politics of writing about sex and navigating creative work in a repressive environment. Join us in conversation as Carmen talks about her first forays into writing. I'm wondering, the first time you wrote a sex scene, was it for a short story? Was it an essay? And knowing yourself and knowing your process and your style, did you have any trepidation about it?Carmen: If we want to be really technical, the first time I ever wrote a sex scene, it was when I was probably about 11 or 12 and I That sounds about right. Yeah. I went through this phase where I wanted to write out dirty sentences, but I didn't know how to do it. So I would be on my family computer and I would write the dirtiest sentence I could think of, which when I wasn't very dirty, I didn't know very much, but I was trying to marshal everything I knew and I would write these sort of sentences and then I got fined it that I would delete the sentence, I would write a different nonsense sentence and then I would save the document multiple times and then I would go and check and double check and make sure there was this other sentence. So I feel like kind of an origin story.I mean, I also was reading, I read a lot of different sort of things when I was young, but I was reading VC Andrew, so when I was too young to be reading VC Andrews, so I feel like I also had encountered sex scenes. That's like an early text for so many of us. Totally. Yeah. I had encountered flowers in the attic and other books in those series and read them and not quite know what to make of it, but it was intriguing and titillating in its own weird way. I think that I was just in this place where I wanted to see what it felt like to do it myself. And then I feel like fast forward to my writing career and my life. Before I even got into grad school, I was writing on my own, I was writing erotica and it was just like a private, or not private because I was actually submitting it to things, but I was like, oh, I wonder if I could try this and see.And I was pretty good at it. I really liked it. And then I remember this other kind of interesting moment. I was in my second semester at Iowa as a grad student and I was a runner up in this erotica contest for this magazine that was like a short-lived erotica magazine for women, for straight women. So essentially I was a runner up for this contest and they were like, okay, we're going to put it in a magazine. Do you want to put it under your name or under a pen name? And that semester I was taking a class with Alex Chee and I knew that Alex Chee had published erotica because it had said so in his bio. And so I met up with Alex and I asked him, and we had this long conversation about using a pen name. So I published that story and a couple other stories in various anthologies and stuff under the pen name Olivia Glass, which is my grandmother's first name.And well, initially it was going to be Miranda, but Miranda Glass was like a cellist or something. I didn't want to mess up her Google results. So I did Olivia Glass and, and then at some point during grad school I was like writing about sex and I just want to fold this all into my practice. I just want to make it all kind of one thing. And so I started submitting work that had more explicit sexual content and I never looked back. I feel like it, it felt so correct when I was doing it. I take sex very seriously and I have a lot of thoughts about it and it's a very important part of my life, and this is true for many people. And I was like, I just so rarely read sex scenes in the perspective of people who are like me. I want to move ahead with that, but IBethanne: Also want to go back to filament for a second because you were submitting something under this pseudonym to a magazine for straight women. Was it because they had a contest? Was it because you weren't finding magazines that took the kind of writing you were doing for queer women? Or tell me a little bit more about that.Carmen: I'm bisexual. Before I went to grad school, I primarily dated men. That was just as the arc of so many queer women go. It was like doing that until I realized, oh, wait. But yeah, I think I was intrigued by the idea, I mean the idea of a magazine centering any women's erotic desires, even straight women.Bethanne: That's what I was getting to.Carmen: That itself is still kind of revolutionary. Obviously I would've been also happy to write for a queer magazine, but the fact was there was just this magazine that had some funding. I mean, it didn't pay a lot, but it paid some money. And it's like how I also really love Magic Mike XXL. I mean it's a very straight, but also it's so much about women's pleasure that I don't mind that it has more of this sort of straight energy because of interested in something that I'm really interested in, which is women's sexuality and the way that women approach sex.Bethanne:What was the moment when you wrote something and you write about sex, like you say all the time now when you thought I've gotten there, I have put a woman right where she's supposed to be. Did you have a moment like that?Carmen: I don't know if it was one singular moment. I mean, I think with my first book I had that story inventory, which was this list of sexual partners. That was a story that I wrote purely out of spite because I had been in a workshop where I had criticized a male classmates' sexual, but I thought sexist story, and he interpreted that as me being a weird prude who didn't like writing about sex. And I was so annoyed. That was his takeaway that I went and just wrotethe story. I was like, I'm going to write a story where every scene is a sex scene. But then of course I had to figure out, well, it can't just be that. What is the other thing happening behind it? And then eventually I figured it out and as I wrote the story, I was like, oh yeah, this is really good.But I remember it feeling like there was a character who was at a loose end and trying to figure out what she wants and what she needs in this very apocalyptic moment. And I think for me, it felt so similar to how I think I've approached being alive, which is, yeah, what does it mean to be in a body in certain ways here? What feels like the end or something close to the end? I think that was a story that really just, yeah, it felt like a moment of kind of a revelation.Bethanne: I think a lot of us feel closer to the end than ever, and yet here we are in these bodies and these bodies still want sex. These bodies still desire things. As you said, sex is something that's very important to you, and I don't think you just mean intellectually either. And so we have this and how do we approach the fact that we have needs and desires and all kinds of different ways that we want to look at them, assuage them, and interact with other people about them? Is there going to be an anthology, not necessarily from you about, I don't know, sex at the end of the world? How do we approach this? It's a huge question, I know.Carmen: I think it's not even so specific as that. I also think that we are actually in a very anti-sex moment. We are in a very sex negative in the United States. The US has always been a very puritanical culture, even just compared to Europe for example. I think that we are also in this historical moment where sex is suspicious, literally. Obviously, we're also in this moment of queer policies, anti-trans policies, anti-abortion stuff, and people talking about getting rid of no-fault divorce, and all these really just unhinged. And it's like you boil it down and it's essentially queer bodies or women's bodies being out of control of the state essentially. And I think that's true culturally. It's funny, like they'll do surveys where people will say there's too much sex in movies and tv and it's less sex in movies and TV than there ever has been. We are just in such a wildly prudish moment in history. So to me, I think the project of thinking about sex not just as pleasure, but also as a political act is so crucial and so important and we really can't lose sight of it. And sex will almost always be the battleground. However tangentially conservatives will fight us on.Bethanne: It's all about control and power. None of it is about pleasure or our humanity, and that's very frightening. Why can't we have hair wherever we want to have it? Or why can't we be sexy if we're sexy to our partner? Why do we have to apologize about ourselves to someone else and so on and so forth.Carmen: I think also that the more we know ourselves, the more hard we are to govern. We are the agenda of these racist rancid pieces of shit that are sort of running everything now and have been for a while. Yeah, their politics are not served by us knowing ourselves better.Bethanne: We get to know ourselves better through our creativity and how to write a sex scene is much less important than writing a sex scene if that's what you want to write. It's really wild that we even have to think about is this going to fly? Is this going to be something that is okay to publish? And fortunately we have, you have the great Alex Chi. We have other writers from RO Kwan to Melissa FBOs, so many really terrific writers on sex and the body, and I worry that the people won't have the same freedom to write. And what do we do about that, Carmen?Carmen: I think there's a few things to do. I think part of it is where you have power in your community or your space or in your household if you are the parent of children thinking about, obviously there's age appropriate sexual education, but this project of knowing ourselves also knowledge is a part of that. That we are entering every phase of our lives with all the information that we need to make decisions and choices about what we do with our bodies and what we want to do. And that is hugely important. And this is also why book Bans and these similar, very sort of regressive policies that again, are being fought for by these awful vial people. Their agenda is served by alienating us and by keeping us from knowing ourselves. And so fighting back against that, either as a parent or as a community member or as a voter, is really important. And then, yeah, it's whose work are you supporting? Who? And if you are a writer yourself or an artist yourself, yeah, how are you encountering yourself in your own work, whether it's writing sex scenes or anything else for that matter. I think that just thinking about where we can show up for the people who like us, want to know ourselves better, and that's a tall order and it's a tall order even at the best of times. And now as we are in the worst of times, it seems even harder, but it's still really important.Bethanne: Thank you, Carmen, for joining us this week. You can find all of Carmen Maria Machado's books wherever books are sold. Now let's move on to Friday reads where we'll see what you've been reading this week.Welcome back to Friday Reads, the last one of this season. Jordan, my producer. Hello, how are you?Jordan: I'm doing well. I have my own little bout with the allergy season, so we're making it through.Bethanne: We are, we are. What have we got on the docket today?Jordan: First up, we've got from Alex Cera, who is reading to the Finland Station by Edmund Wilson.Bethanne: So this one really interested me. It's subtitled a study in the writing and acting of history, and I want to make sure that no one confuses Edmund Wilson with Edmund White. Okay. Edmund White, still alive. Edmund Wilson was one of the most influential 20th century American writers and literary critics. And so Alex has put up an image to an Abe books page for a hardcover from 1940 of this really very influential book. Again, like the Influential Critic. The thing about it is not many people liked Wilson. He was called a fat ferocious man, petty, pretentious, and petulant, a failure at many of the most ordinary tasks of life. And that was by someone who was writing an appreciation of Wilson. But this 1940 examination of revolutionary thought around the world might just be something that's relevant right now. What do you think, Jordan?Jordan: Yeah, I think definitely, revolution is in the air, I hope.Bethanne: Yeah, right there with you. So who is reading what next?Jordan: Well, speaking of a little bit of a reverence we've got from Danny Greer, who is reading a good and relevant book for the time they're reading Fuck: An Irreverent History of the F-Word.Bethanne: It's by Rufuss Lodge, and the title on the jacket actually has asterisks in the middle of the F and the K, but we all know it's “fuck”. So it's a bright yellow and black book jacket, a really fun use of very old fashioned tariffs and flourishes because who among us has not dropped the occasional F-bomb, whether involuntarily or with deep sincerity? I don't listen to that many audiobooks, but I think this one might be best appreciated through earphones. If you don't know where we in the English language got this ever useful, epithet, largest little volume will prove lightning, but it might even more enlightening when it comes to the various famous people who have effed up and let's slip the frigging freaking fudging fabulous F word Jordan. So I love that one. And finally a little bit more serious, but still very, very interesting.Jordan: Yeah. We've got one last one this week from Emma Vardy, who's reading Orbital b…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Reclaiming Our Dreams with Laila Lalami Apr 11, 2025
    Show notes

    Two more episodes to go in season two! For this one, Bethanne sits down with Laila Lalami to discuss the impact of technology on identity and how we are catering ourselves towards algorithms, the role of community in freedom, and the relationship between privacy, dreams, and personal integrity. You can buy The Dream Hotel wherever books are sold.George Orwell makes another appearance on the TBM podcast, this time with his novel 1984. Will Bethanne let another Orwell book live in the canon, or will she kick this ‘mother of dystopian novels’ out for good?Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists, this week focusing on feminist dystopian classics. Titles include: Station Elevenby Emily St. John Mandel, The Powerby Naomi Alderman, Severance by Ling Ma, Book of Joanby Lidia Yuknavitch, The City We BecameN.K. Jesmisin, and Afterland by Lauren Beukes.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned:The Dream Hotelby Laila Lalami,Show Don’t Tell: Stories by Curtis Sittenfeld,Parisian Lives: Samuel Beckett, Simone de Beauvoir, and Me: A Memoir by Deirdre Bair,The Chosen and the Beautiful by Ngih Vo1984by George Orwell,Station Elevenby Emily St. John Mandel,The Powerby Naomi Alderman,Severance by Ling Ma,Book of Joanby Lidia Yuknavitch,The City We BecameN.K. Jemisin, andAfterland by Lauren Beukes.TranscriptBethanne: Welcome to season two of The Book Maven: a Literary Revue. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dig into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode, but this week, I talked to Laila Lalami about her latest novel, the Dream Hotel.We discussed the role of community in freedom, the impact of technology on identity, and the relationship between dreams, privacy, and personal integrity. Join us in conversation as Laila discusses her exploration of immigration and dystopia in The Dream Hotel.I don't think that people understand how much immigration is based on. Selection and eugenics and things like that. And so, in the Dream Hotel, I found so much that spoke to the immigrant experience. How does that resonate with you, especially because you've written before about the immigrant experience and what it is like for people to come to this country specifically?Laila: Yeah, this is a fascinating question. When I set out to write a book, it was. I started working on it 10 years ago, and it was a book that came to me as a question, like, what if we keep going like this? And data collection continues to be more and more. Precise, granular, and invasive, the next step is our interior lives.What would happen if we lose privacy in our dreams? It was just a question, and that was what the book started as for me in the form of a question. Then I set that aside and ended up writing The Other Americans. I picked up the manuscript again in 2020 and finished it last year. Interestingly, this idea of estrangement was that our relationship with technology almost encourages an estrangement from the self.Where we start obeying these extremely arbitrary rules about how we present ourselves in public. So, for example, you might take a picture of yourself instead of a photo. This way, you might angle the camera at 45-degree angles because that's more flattering. Whatever flattering means, you might post it between this hour and that hour because that's when you'll get the most views.You might answer your comments this way because that's what will get the most engagement. We are training ourselves to behave in ways that satisfy these algorithms. But in the process of doing that, we estrange ourselves from our instincts, our beliefs, and our morals.From our sense of what is correct and estrangement from the self, we have these different selves, the cells we present to the public, and all that. First of all, it is a feeling that is universal and deeply human. But I think what happens in immigration is that you move from one country to the next, you have to build a new identity.Sometimes, that process might involve taking on new names and all of that. So yes, I can see a connection; indeed, the book can be read as a dystopia. You can read it as a reflection of the past and that experience.Bethanne: I was thinking very specifically at first about the experience of immigration as a kind of fragmentation in the sense that you're talking about because when you do go to a different country to live as opposed to simply visiting with a visa and a passport, you have to break your identity down into all of these documents.Sarah, of course, has her identity broken down in slightly different ways because of the digital and invasive nature. And Layla, what you were talking about is speaking to the idea that we want to give away all the things that make up an individual? And if we do choose to give some of it away, how do we understand that?So I guess in the case of Sarah, who is already being held in this detention center when we meet her, that's not giving anything away. We know that she was living a, you know, new mom of twins, she's married, she's living a very everyday life, and it turns out that because of some things in her dreams.She can be detained and told, look, we don't want you to do anything terrible, so we're gonna hold you until we're sure you won't. It's a wild, wild idea, and it's also an idea that came from the question you asked. When did you know? That this is where Sarah was. When did you know that she was in this place?Laila: Yeah, remember I said earlier that I started working on the book in 2014? So initially, my idea had been, okay, I'm gonna imagine a future in which dreams are no longer private. How would I get there if I were to imagine this world? Immediately, I had the idea of a device that would help you sleep because of most of the technology that we use.It has become a part of our lives because of its convenience. So if I can create a device that helps me sleep, especially since I'm an insomniac, and I would be like, yes, I'll sign up. I'll get this device. If you can guarantee me nine hours of sleep, sign me up. I will do anything, right?And, of course, the fine, that's the device. Then I started working on how the novel started, which began in this tech company. But after I wrote a couple of chapters, I just. I couldn't stay in the tech company. I couldn't make myself and use my imaginative powers to remain inside the tech company for 400 pages.I just didn't. I worked at a tech company long before I wrote my first book, so I knew about the culture and what goes on there. But I didn't have fun with it and didn't want to stay in it. So, I set the book aside and decided to work on this other manuscript that I had also. But when I returned to it in 2020, I thought, "Wait a minute."If I were to use this device, the idea for the book would be that it's liberalizing the fact that we are losing our freedoms. Your dreams are deeply intimate. No one else shares them with you. You can be as close as you want with another human being. Say, for example, your partner, and you can share many of your thoughts and feelings, your petty jealousies, and the less savory aspects of yourself with that person who loves you and doesn't judge you.You can have all that, but that doesn't mean they can share this part of you. That part of you is yours. It is intimate. It belongs only to you and to me. It starts getting into these ideas of personal integrity, like basically the fact that you own your body, you own your mind, it is yours.You think about it; everything inside it belongs to you. It's a human right. If we keep having this data being collected about us, and let's say that in the world of the novel, I have literalized a debt loss of privacy, to the extent that you know your dreams can be seen by these tech companies.Let's say I've literalized it, then. What would be the next logical step? How can I make that idea come out more? Since this is all about the loss of freedom, I will put this character in a semi-carceral, confined environment. So think asylum, think psychiatric hospital, think leprosarium.All of these areas that you think of as being locked, Ward. Yes. Yes. Yeah, exactly. They're little mini societies, and I will put my character in there to literalize that idea and then see what happens next.Bethanne: Do you know what I think is hilarious about this? And there's not much hilarious about it on the page, but I.What is more boring than hearing someone else talk about their dreams? Layla? Yes. Yes.Laila: But not in thisBethanne: book, I don't think. I hope not. Not in this book. Not in this book. And here's the thing. This is what is so essential about the privacy you're talking about, to each of us. Our dreams are exciting because of all the parts of us that make up those dreams, and there is no one in our life saved, perhaps for a parent.Who has all of that except us? And then, of course, the fact is that we start as children and become adults. So even parents don't have access to everything in our lives, but our dreams have that access.Laila: Power is most successful when it has been internalized. If we look at it, then we are surveilling ourselves.My fear with technology is that we are in the early stages of that, where we are internalizing, oh, I have to post at this hour. I have to have this many followers, and I, you know, have to do this, and I have to behave in specific ways online. I agree to the terms of service, and my phone has to know how many steps I take every day, and it tracks me from this.We accept all this. And where are we headed with that? Are we bringing yet another form of control into our lives, and we have begun to internalize it? So, the book internalizes that control by saying, "Here's a device that gives access to dreams and kind of opens up."Drawing parallels between things like patriarchy, colonialism, and surveillance, like all of these are systems of power, and none of them would survive without the surveillance that allows it to remain in place.Bethanne: That is fantastic, and I could end there, but there's one more thing that I have to bring up because this is very important.Her being a new mom. It is crucial because there is perhaps no time in any person's life, any person who bears a child. That is the time in your life when you become public property. Oh myLaila: God, yes. No, I get exactly what you're saying. I mean, yeah, I get it. Yeah. And so.Bethanne: It's not just that Sarah is already in this state of belonging to a state, but also she's in a state where she realizes that she can't be free without her children.Her children are vital to her, but it's a time when you also realize your ability to rely only on yourself. Is that an act? Yeah.Laila: Yeah. It's a very vulnerable time in people's lives. And I get what you're saying about like the loss of privacy, the fact that you're in hospital rooms and strangers are coming in and you're entirely at their mercy.And then, of course, when you meet your child, they'll roll your life for the next few years, the absolute desperation for a good night's sleep. Again, technology has all the answers and is undoubtedly very convenient. Still, its costs are just now beginning to reveal themselves.Bethanne: Thank you, Layla, for joining us this week. You can find all of Layla LA's books wherever they are sold. Let's move on to Friday reads, where we'll see what you've been reading this week.We are back with another round of Friday reads, a post sharing what you all are reading. As always, my producer, Jordan, is here to help me comb through. So what do we have up first, Jordan?Jordan: First, we've got from Kurt, whose hashtag for Friday Reads is Show Don't Tell by Curtis Sittenfeld.Bethanne: This is the cover of Curtis Seinfeld's new book of short stories, which Kurt has put up.It is a woman floating in blue water. She's down toward the bottom of the cover with her hands behind her head in a one-piece bathing suit, and then the titles are in yellow. It's really striking. And what I wanted to say about this is that Seinfeld is one of those authors who switches between short fiction and novels with great aplomb.Suppose you haven't read her most recent. Novel romantic comedy. It's hilarious. Don't waste any more time. Anyone who loves Katherine Haney or Haney, however, Katherine, I've forgotten how you pronounce your name, Karen Russell, who's more sci-fi, but still very fun, very funny. This is an excellent short storybook for women looking for something that isn't necessarily light but has.Heart and compassion. So there we go. What's next?Jordan: Second. Today, we've got from Esther, who says, as a lifelong reader of biographies, I'm really enjoying Deirdre Bair's memoir Parisian Lives about writing the biographies of Samuel Beckett and Simone de Beauvoir. Bair faced enormous challenges, including finding research and money, balancing work and family, and dealing with sexism.Bethanne: There's so much going on in the lives of both Samuel Beckett and Simone de Beauvoir, and I'm not surprised. Deirdre Bair, a well-known biographer, received a national book award for the Beckett biography, which came out in 1978. She was also nominated for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize twice, once for Simone de Beauvoir and once for a biography of Carl Young.So she's gotten a lot of kudos for her biography skills. And let me tell you, everything I know about biographers shows something like this. It is a labor of love and expertise and something that can make fantastic reading. You know, you would think, Deirdre Bear, who's that?I mean, I know who Samuel Beckett is, and I know who de Beauvoir is, but somehow, Bear is so talented that her placing herself in this one just makes sense. It's a really fantastic book. I highly recommend it. It just happens that I read it. I don't always pick Friday Reed's recommendations that I've read, but in this case, I have. I guess I've read all three this week.I don't know Jordan, and I don't know what's going on with me, but what? This is our last post.Jordan: Our last post today is from a library that says it's Friday. What are you reading? And shared a lovely cherry blossom themed graphic.Bethanne: This is precisely why I chose it; it's because of the library thing. Hello? Library thing.Tim, I thought that cherry blossoms were so perfect here in DC. It's been a big cherry blossom week. Everything's gorgeous, and The Chosen and the Beautiful by Ngih Vo is also gorgeous. This book is a sci-fi take on The Great Gatsby. I happened to have been talking a great deal about The Great Gatsby last week in a conversation with Andrew Keen that I'll share.In the newsletter at some point. But this one by Nivo enchanted me. Not just because it had the sci-fi aspect but because VO as a queer Asian novelist has a really different take on the class structure that is so vaunted by so many critics in The Great Gatsby. So. check this one out.Definitely get out and see any blossoms in your area. Jordan and I will be back next week with some more Friday Reeds. Thank you, Jordan.The Dream Hotel is Layla Emmy's latest novel. In it, we learn a lot about what it means when people's lives are interfered with by an overreaching, overarch…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Fiction Makes Us Kinder with Chris Bohjalian Apr 04, 2025
    Show notes

    The Book Maven is back with another important conversation about finding empathy in our writing. In this episode, Bethanne Patrick talks to Chris Bohjalian about his newest novel The Jackal’s Mistress. They discuss recounting difficult historic events, finding empathy through fiction, and the process of researching information for this book.Canon or Can It returns this week, focusing on Gone With the Wind, which lives in infamy for its portrayal of American chattel slavery as secondary to its romantic narrative.Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists, this week focusing on books with phenomenal TV adaptations. Titles include: Restorationby Rose Tremain,The Beekeeper of Aleppoby Christy Lefteri,Brotherless Nightby V. V. Ganeshananthan,In the Shadow of the Banyan by Vaddey Ratner,Savage Coastby Muriel Rukeyser, and Half of a Yellow Sunby Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned:The Jackal's Mistress, Skeletons at the Feast, Secrets of Eden, Tran-sister Radio: A Transgender Love Story, Midwives, The Flight Attendant, and The Amateur by Chris BohjalianCold Mountainby Charles FrazierThe Vermont Brigade in the Shenandoah Valleyby Aldace WalkerThis Republic of Sufferingby Drew Gilpin FaustThe Heart of American Poetry and Lunch Poemsby Frank O’HaraNot the End of the Worldby Hannah RitchieNighttime is My Timeby Mary Higgins ClarkGone With the Windby Margaret MitchellThe Unvanquishedby William FaulknerThe Red Badge of Courageby Stephen CraneJubileeby Margaret WalkerRestorationby Rose TremainThe Beekeeper of Aleppoby Christy LefteriBrotherless Night by V. V. GaneshananthanIn the Shadow of the Banyanby Vaddey RatnerSavage Coastby Muriel RukeyserHalf of a Yellow Sunby Chimamanda Ngozi AdichieEpisode Transcript:Welcome to season two of The Book Maven: A Literary Revue. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dig into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I'll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode. But first…This week, I talked to Chris Bohjalian about his latest novel, The Jackal's Mistress. We discussed recounting difficult historical events, finding empathy through fiction, and the process of researching for this book. Join us now in conversation as Chris talks about The Jackal's Mistress as a uniquely American work of fiction.BP: Does it feel big, The Jackal's Mistress to you?CB: First of all, Bethanne, thank you. It's always great to chat with you.BP: Thank you. Likewise.CB: It's my 25th book. Now, the fact that it's my 25th book doesn't necessarily mean it is a big book. 25 books are only a testament to my longevity, not necessarily my talent.BP: But, you know, even if we were to take talent out of the equation, this book feels... it has the feel of relevance. It feels like a very American book. I'm not trying to say Great American Novel. Not at all. But it’s a very American book, and it’s a book for our time right now.CB: I hope so. The fact is there is a lot of Civil War literature.BP: There is. And yet, like World War II literature, it never seems to run out of relevance. There’s always a place for something that helps us see things in a different way.CB: And the thing I love about Civil War fiction versus Civil War history—and I love Civil War history too, make no mistake—is that Civil War fiction tends to focus on individuals. Women, men, you get up close and personal. Whether it’s the remarkable short stories of Ambrose Bierce, Cold Mountain (Charles Frazier), or Dolen Perkins-Valdez. When you write about individuals in the Civil War in fiction, I think you see the conflagration in ways you might not when you're watching the sweep of armies across Gettysburg or Georgia.BP: These people were real. And it’s not simply a bunch of facts. There’s writing about them. There are historical documents. It's a story that I wonder how it got lost like this. I mean, it was meant for you clearly—because how else did it get lost like this?CB: Yeah. All we know about the two principals, Henry Bedell, a lieutenant with the Vermont Brigade, and Betty Van Meter, who lived in the northern part of the Shenandoah Valley, 20 miles southwest of Harper’s Ferry in Berryville, all we really know about these two people begins with a Middlebury College valedictorian from the class of 1862 named Aldace Walker. Because attrition among officers was so high by 1864, this kid is a major in the Vermont Brigade, and before he turns 30, he writes his memoir, The Vermont Brigade in the Shenandoah Valley. About five or six pages in, he refers to what he calls “one anecdote.”The anecdote is the story of one of the lieutenants in the Vermont Brigade being left for dead and kept alive by a rebel woman who literally kept him alive, for lack of a better word—and this is not the word Walker used, of course, “karma.” She’s thinking, “If I can keep this horrific Yankee blue belly alive, maybe my husband will someday come home to me.” That’s fundamentally the true part of the story, and that’s really all we know. There are other less important but interesting footnotes. For example, in 1915, Betty Van Meter was given a citation by the Vermont legislature for keeping a son of Vermont alive in 1864. Abraham Lincoln’s Secretary of War, the notoriously curmudgeonly Edwin Stanton, was so moved by her efforts that he tried to move heaven and earth to see if he could find her husband in the Union POW system. When I spoke to historians about this story, most of them had no idea because historians focus on the sweep of armies, or they focus on very specific, interesting macro changes in the country, such as Drew Gilpin Faust’s This Republic of Suffering, which examines how 620,000 dead Americans dramatically changed our view of death, religion, the afterlife, and, of course, medicine. They’re not focused on Henry Bedell and Betty Van Meter in a farmhouse in the Shenandoah Valley doing this unbelievably dangerous thing because there’s Jule Early’s Confederate army. There’s John Mosby, who led his guerillas, and hanging Union officers. What Betty Van Meter did was treason. So, the few historians who’d heard of this anecdote knew very little about it, and they all asked me the same thing: What have you learned? Do you think they were lovers?BP: Oh, I’m banging my forehead. It matters not one whit.CB: No. What matters is the unbelievable humanity of this woman who makes this decision, for whatever reason.BP: I think people who write stories, who write novels, and who have developed great empathy and compassion in reading and writing—considering what stories can do for us—are going to have a role in standing up, not just in the face of whatever comes, but, and this is something that is relevant to The Jackel’s Mistresss, as you pointed out in the days afterward. Because those stories we have from the Civil War now, the testimony we have from someone like Aldis Walker and you point out in your afterword, he became a truly, truly gifted writer and lawyer. He was a really important person. This is the work we have to continue doing. And it isn’t always about history books with numbers and dates. It’s also about foregrounding the stories, as you said, about Betty/Libby and karma and kindness, and making sure people see those because there are already stories about cruelty and callousness, and that seems to be such an important part of it. To me, I don’t know if I’ve read all 25 of your books.CB: Oh, you don’t want to. Some of them are absolute train wrecks. I’m responsible for the single worst first novel ever published, bar none.BP: That’s an amazing achievement! You’ve given yourself, however, that award—well, I don’t know if it stands, Chris, but I will say I’ve read many, and I believe that Secrets of Eden – that was something that hit me when I read it: the compassion for the characters. And I wonder, where do you attribute this? Maybe you wrote a novel that wasn’t as good as a later one, but I’m looking at you, even though our audience won’t see the video. I am looking at your incredible bookshelves, which I’ve had the privilege of seeing on various Zooms and things before. Where does this deep compassion come from for you? Does it come from reading? Does it come from something else? Where does this deep compassion? We mentioned Luis Urrea earlier before we started recording, and he has always said, “Fill your pen with compassion, or don’t pick it up.”CB: Oh my God. His story, my God. The whole idea that a writer’s career begins with the murder of his father is just unbelievable to me.BP: Unbelievable.CB: So, where does the compassion come from? If I have compassion… you know, I view The Jackal's Mistress fundamentally as a Romeo and Juliet kind of love story about doomed lovers from opposite sides of the wall. But I grew up in a lot of places. At one point, I went to five schools in six years, in three states. I wasn’t an army kid…BP: Oh my goodness!CB: … we moved around. We moved around a lot. And so I was always that kid trying to figure out the mores and the culture. Scott Fitzgerald talks a lot about how writers are observant. You’re always that kid with your fingers pressed against the glass, from the outside looking inside at the party, wondering why you weren’t invited. I think that’s why I’m a writer: I had the great, weird blessing of moving around a lot. I always knew my parents loved me, but it’s only in the last 25 years that I’ve really begun to understand their demons as well as their angels. Maybe that’s where my characters come from—hearts and souls. The whole idea that my parents were damaged, and I loved them, and they loved me. And heaven knows I’m a mess.BP: But we can love each other, even when we are imperfect—perhaps even because we’re imperfect.CB: I love that.BP: Thank you.CB: And I think you’re definitely onto something. We all know that fiction makes us more empathetic. Fiction makes us better, kinder, gentler, people because, you know, to paraphrase Atticus Finch in Harper Lee, you really don’t understand a person until you walk in their shoes. Again, not wanting to go crazy with the politics here or say I’m a champion for anything—because God knows you don’t want me championing any of your causes! God knows if I champion your cause you are going to lose! Okay, The Jackal's Mistress, as we talked about earlier, is my 25th book. So, I’ve been doing this countdown on social media from my first book to 25th.BP: Yes, I’ve been watching this!CB: Yes! And recently, we did my seventh novel, a 2000 novel called Trans-Sister Radio: A Transgender Love Story. Of all the books I’ve posted so far, including even Midwives, which, you know, was a #1 New York Times bestseller and Oprah’s Book Club selection, and a movie with Sissy Spacek—Trans-Sister Radio has elicited the most comments on my social media, with readers talking about how this was their introduction to the trans community. I’m really glad you wrote it because I understood things I didn’t understand before. And it’s a novel, you know, one published 25 years ago. You mentioned Secrets of Eden, a novel about a minister and a domestic abuse murder-suicide that might actually be a double homicide. That was an introduction to many of my readers to the epidemic of domestic abuse—domestic violence, not just in this country but around the world. And that’s another example of what fiction can do.BP: That is a great example of what fiction can do, and I hope that The Jackal's Mistress will, for many readers, be an introduction to the stories we don’t often hear about any war, let alone the American Civil War. So, I have to ask before you go, what comes next? Is it going to be a new novel? Is it going to be a movie? What’s next? I mean, come on—you know The Flight Attendant, Chris, that was amazing!CB: No, thank you. Thank you. All, all props to the flight attendants Kaley Cuoco, showrunner Steve Yockey, Max, and Warner—um, I love the TV series. It was really fun and great. Okay, what's next? And it's all done. It comes out in August 2026. It’s a novel called The Amateur, and you're going to love it. A lot of it is set at Smith College in 1979 and 1980. It’s about an aspiring LPGA golf superstar: a young woman who, the summer before she’s about to start college, accidentally kills a caddy at a swanky country club when she drives a ball through the practice net and hits him in the forehead.BP: Chris, I’m going to be begging Todd Dowdy, our beloved Todd, for some kind of PDF immediately. I can’t wait. How exciting is that? That’s going to be huge! But in the meantime, you’ve got a lot to do with The Jackal’s Mistress now, and I hope everything goes so well. I’ll be talking it up with my usual enthusiasm.Thank you, Chris, for joining us this week. You can find all of Chris Bohjalian’s books wherever books are sold. Now let’s move on to Friday Reads, where we’ll see what you've been reading this week.Readers everywhere, welcome back to another Friday Reads session where I talk to you about what you are reading online. And as always, Jordan, my producer, is here to talk with me about the posts you’ve put up. So, what do we have this week?JA: Our first post today is from Tracy Wise, who says #FridayReads: “I think I may have fallen in love with Frank O'Hara's poetry. Well, better late than never.”BP: It’s edited by Edward Hirsch, The Heart of American Poetry, and Tracy’s put up an image of the book. Since she mentions Frank O'Hara, I just want to say that Frank O'Hara was not only one of our nimblest poets but also someone who sadly died way too young at around 40. O'Hara’s Harvard roommate was none other than Edward Gorey—I love that. You should fall in love with Frank O'Hara the way Tracy has, and I recommend starting with his Lunch Poems. They’re really, really beautiful. This compendium by Edward Hirsch is a beautiful and deeply personal look at American bards through the centuries, from Phyllis Wheatley, the first African American woman to publish poetry in the United States, to Joy Harjo, who has been our poet laureate and is Native American. There are 40 poems, from the immediately recognizable like Emily Dickinson’s “Because I Could Not Stop for Death” to the downright enigmatic like Sylvia Plath’s “Daddy”—or maybe it’s not that enigmatic. I’m not sure. Finally, I’ll tell you that if you're a fan of the full breadth of American literature, whether it covers the personal, the political, the natural, or the fantastical, this is a beautiful volume to add to your shelves. What’s next, Jordan?JA: Our next post today is from Gemma Bristow, who says #FridayReads: Not the End of the World by Hannah Ritchie, an accessible and readable attempt to define the most effective solutions to environmental problems based on data.BP: This is very interesting because Ritchie is a data scientist at Oxford University and is attached to the Our World In Data project. She’s also a follower of big optimist Professor Hans Rosling. So, more on the big optimist in a moment. Gemma has put up a book jacket, and the reason I love this one is because it’s got its library garland wrap on it. Anyone who’s ever worked in a library knows what I mean—the plastic that signifies, “I’ve checked this book out of a library.” I love that. The subtitle of Ritchie’s book is How We Can Be the First Generation to Build a Sustainable Planet. That’s big optimism, right? Let’s all hope the author is correct. But even if she is, there are some things she fails to address at all, such as geopolitics and their influence on what happens with sustainability and environmental i…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Staying Hungry with Min Jin Lee Mar 28, 2025
    Show notes

    Let them eat cake! Or kale. Or cookies. Or whatever women are hungry for. In this episode, Bethanne Patrick sits down with highly educated and highly respected author Min Jin Lee to discuss hunger, most specifically women’s hunger, and how radical it is for women to loudly voice ‘I’M HUNGRY’. Min’s hit novel Pachinko has been turned into a renowned drama series on Apple TV.We’re back with a Pop! Goes The Culture this week, focusing on The Color Purple by Alice Walker. Bethanne decides to do something different this week and focus not only on the book, but on Alice Walker’s cultural impact as well.Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists, this week focusing on books with phenomenal TV adaptations. Titles include: Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood, Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn, Orange is the New Black by Piper Kerman, The Little Drummer Girl by John Le Carré, Patrick Melrose (series) by Edward St. Aubyn, and The Queen’s Gambit by Walter Tevis.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned:Pachinkoand Free Food for Millionairesby Min Jin Lee,Authority by Andrea Long Chu,Towards Zero by Agatha Christie,The Thinking Heart by David Grossman,The Color Purple by Alice Walker,Alias Grace by Margaret Atwood,Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn,Orange is the New Black by Piper Kerman,The Little Drummer Girl by John Le Carré,Patrick Melrose (series) by Edward St. Aubyn, andThe Queen’s Gambit by Walter Tevis.Episode TranscriptWelcome to Season Two of The Book Maven: A Literary Revue. This season, we’ll talk to leading authors, dive into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I’ll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We’ll have all of that and more in this episode. But first, this week, I talked to Min Jin Lee about hunger. We discuss consuming knowledge, relishing experiences, and the radical nature of a smart and hungry woman. Join us now in conversation as Min talks about the importance of food in her writing.BP: I know Pachinko, for example, well Free Food for Millionaires as well—there’s so much about food in your writing. So, I wanted to talk about how you learned to write about food. You certainly weren't a food writer or a food journalist when you began writing fiction. Were there challenges in that? Was it something that came very naturally to you?MJL: That's so interesting. I don’t even think about my food writing at all. I have actually done some food writing. I’ve written for Travel and Leisure and S Traveler and Food and Wine. I’ve written little essays and pieces, but…You know what? MFK Fisher, who is the great OG food writer, was asked why she writes about food, and her answer was: "No, I write about hunger." Isn’t that good? Isn’t that the best? It’s so good—it gets right to the heart of things. And I definitely feel like a hungry person sometimes. There are so many things I want to be nourished with, and whenever I do feel nourished by something or someone, or by a moment, I do feel joy. Because I don’t expect happiness in life at all. At all. As a matter of fact, I’m a little bit of a Grinch.BP: There's the headline.MJL: Min Jin Lee is a Grinch! So whenever I’m talking to young people and they say things like, “Oh, that job doesn’t make me happy,” or “That situation makes me really unhappy,” or “I’m really traumatized about something,” I just think, “That sounds fine.” I don’t even get troubled by it. I always kind of think, “Yeah, that’s life, pal.” I usually say something that sounds really tough, but I always say, “Seeking happiness is very sheep-like behavior. We get into a lot of trouble looking for happiness. I don’t think it’s something you go looking for. It comes to you now and then.”BP: Happiness is definitely not something you get to have all the time. I completely agree with you, but I want to go back to something you said a minute ago about being a very hungry person.MJL: Yeah, I’m hungry.BP: What does that mean? Since you know you can’t be happy all the time, what does hunger mean? Because hunger doesn’t mean you’re always going to be satisfied, does it?MJL: But I really respect my appetites. I respect my hunger, I respect my appetites. And if the world says that, especially women, that we’re not supposed to be hungry, for me to say that is actually a very threatening thing to the world.BP: It’s radical. It’s radical for women to say we are hungry, that we want more. Something I’ve talked about, and I think I wrote about it in my memoir, is growing up and how the biggest or best portion was always reserved for dad. Because in my family, like so many others, dad was the one who went out to work. So the women were always saying, “You don’t get that beautiful pork chop,” or “You don’t get the delicious crusty corner of the casserole because that’s for the man in the family.” And I’m not blaming my parents for that. That was the reality. But I definitely blame society for that—telling women, “Hold back. Hold back.”MJL: I recently… so you asked me about cooking and food writing, and I gave you the MFK Fisher quote because I think talking about food is, in many ways, a lovely and polite conversation. But the root of everything for me is that I have this enormous appetite. And I’ve been made to feel ashamed for having it for most of my life. It’s exactly what you said about dad getting the beautiful pork chop, or how we have to save the best for the men. In Korea, that thinking lasted for a very long time—men get to eat first, the sons eat with the men, but the daughters are in the kitchen. And I think there’s something wrong with me or right with me… I want to eat. And if you make me feel ashamed of it, you’re telling me I shouldn’t be human. That I shouldn’t have energy. That I shouldn’t keep going. This is my right. I have a right to my appetite. I feel like that is as much of a feminist gesture as anything else.BP: You know, this is incredible to me that you said that, Min, because… at some point last year, my doctor wanted me to take one of these semaglutide injections—just like every woman I know seems to be on one of these. So I tried it, but I stopped. She asked why I stopped, and I said, “Well, I had absolutely no appetite at all.” And she said, “Well, that’s good. We want to get your weight down.” But I said, “No, having no appetite made me feel less than human. I didn’t feel like a human being.” And the doctor—oh, she clearly didn’t understand. She’s a very thin, health-conscious person, great, certainly not at all someone with disordered eating, but she couldn’t understand that someone with more weight on their body would rather feel human than feel no appetite. That really shocked me.MJL: I really respect you saying that. I understand that a lot of people are taking semaglutides, and everyone has a personal journey with their weight and health. But what I really love about what you said, as a metaphor and also as an allegory for our lives, is that our hungers, our appetites, our weight… Even the word “weight,” right? The word “glory” is actually another way of saying “weight” or “significance.” Are you expecting me to give my glory and my weight and my significance and my gravitas away? And for what?BP: Say that again.MJL: What do I get in return if I gave away my glory? What do I get in return? Tell me what I get in return because, unfortunately for the world, I’ve been a very educated person. I’m a very well-read person. And I’m in good company. Sister,BP: Yes, you are a very well-educated, very well-read person. And the unfortunate thing for the world is that a well-read woman is a dangerous thing.MJL: A well-read woman… I mean, first of all, we’re well-read women and we’re writers. We might as well be anarchists. Yes, with really good manners.BP: You know, this is a good time for me to remind our audience that Min is also an attorney—and a really good one. So, you know, tell me what I get in return. As you said, you’re a great negotiator. And this is the thing—don’t ask me to give up. For instance, we’re talking about all these hungers, and hunger means so many different things. It’s not just about food. And hunger—when we recognize it, when we try to fulfill it, we don’t always fulfill it—but when we try to fulfill it, that is a radical act.MJL: Yeah.BP: Especially, as you said, for women to say, “You know, I’m just going to eat this entire package of cookies,” or “I feel like eating a bowl of kale,” when it’s what we want, instead of what someone else wants. And that’s the radical part of it because it doesn’t have to be about sweet things, soft things, or fattening things. It’s about determining what we truly want. And that is something we women, especially women… we were both born in the 20th century. Sometimes you hear a kid when you’re teaching refer to it as the 1900s, and I think, “What happened?!” But that is a radical act. As you said, Min.MJL: I love the allegory of hunger, appetite, nourishment, and food. And if I did want to eat a package of cookies—which I have done—and I’m not ashamed, you will not make me feel ashamed of wanting to have done that, and it’s because I wanted something else. Because there was no way that package of cookies gave me the nutritional value I needed. And I think just saying it all of a sudden makes me realize I don’t need to eat a package of cookies anymore.BP: Right. Right.MJL: Because what I really wanted wasn’t just the package. Maybe what I really wanted was something delightful, sweet, and almost forbidden. And this was the only thing I could get—maybe the $2.99 package of Hydrox was what I got because I couldn’t afford Oreos. Right? But you know what? Coming from parts of my life where I couldn’t afford things, I know exactly what it’s like to buy something that’s a day old as opposed to something that’s fresh out of the oven. And when I couldn’t walk into restaurants or stores. And I think now that I can tell that and be honest about it, you can’t hurt me anymore with that. And I think that’s the freedom of saying, “I’m hungry.” It’s not that I can’t do it, but in order for me to even get that nourishment, I had to say it. I was so uncomfortable in my skin going to a place like Yale, where there were so many written and unwritten social codes that I was trying to understand. I was so embarrassed. I didn’t have the right language, the right clothes, the right conversations, or the right experiences. And I remember being in certain spaces where I was eating away from my household, surrounded by food I’d never had before—endless muffins…BP: Waffles, peanut butter toast whenever you wanted it…MJL: … as much as you wanted! And I remember gaining all this weight, and then also becoming a sexual person, right? All of a sudden, there was access to your body, the idea that someone else might want pleasure from you—but you not even knowing what pleasure is.BP: And I think that’s so fascinating because, a couple of minutes ago, you said, “You didn’t have the right experiences.” I had a similar experience. Of course, it’s not completely analogous because I happen to be white, but I went from the Rust Belt to Smith and also didn’t have the right experiences. I didn’t have the right family vacations, I didn’t have the right genealogies to talk about. And I’m not talking about going back to famous people, just that I didn’t have the right aunts and uncles, you know? That sort of thing.MJL: Shame on you, Bethanne.BP: I know, I know. And the food, in particular, at Smith was really amazing. I mean, amazing. We had brunches on Sundays with omelet stations, trifles, and all kinds of stuff. And you think, “I’m working really hard, visiting privilege, so I’m going to have this.” And I think I gained the freshman 15. I probably got rid of some of it. That's not the point. I think what you said about visiting privilege versus having it—uh, being in it—are different. They're different aspects of life. So, talk more about visiting privilege.MJL: It's shocking. It's almost shocking to visit privilege, especially because, you know, it's not yours to keep. You're not even questioning why people have it. You're like, “Oh, I can't have it more than these three hours that I get to visit this room.” And I find that to be fascinating.BP: Correct.MJL: We're going back, but the three at the women's center. Where I took these classes with this really, like, such a sweet young woman. Like, if I could find her right now, I'd give her a hug. This young woman very had this clipboard, and you know, gave us a reading list of all the books that we were supposed to read, and every week she would do these little exercises with us to try to teach us about how to taste food. Like, she would actually try to teach us how to taste food and then teach us about how to manage. She wasn't telling us to eat this number of calories. She actually taught us about abundance. The idea that you could trust your body, that you could trust you, that you would come through for your hunger. And then you'll stand up for your right to eat. And I remember thinking like, “Holy smoke! What a way to think!” Like, you weren’t gonna become a model.BP: That’s radical.MJL: It is radical! And when you tell a person, the idea, when you tell a person who's been told to eat less their whole life, that the exact opposite thing, which is, “No, I don't want you to eat more. I don't want you to eat less. I want you to know that you have the right to eat that.” I want you to eat that. I want you to be healthy and strong, and that you will have the power and the energy to continue. Like, if you explain it in that way, and not about like, “You want to be a size two for reasons that are not clear to me.” And also, what do you get in return? Like, I think it was— it came at such the right time in my life to be told to tell a 19-year-old woman, who’s filled with self-hatred for the skin that she's in, that you have the right to be here. Like, it’s mind-blowing.BP: That is mind-blowing. And it makes me think, I, you know, again, I know we're not talking really deeply about your actual fiction right now…MJL: but I... But it's actually all of my fiction.BP: This is all, this is everything. Forgive me if I mispronounce his name, uni. Is it Honney? So, it makes me think of the very beginning of the family in Pachinko because he is someone who could so easily have been left to wither and die. Families did not have to allow children with challenges like his to keep going. And we know about so many times and places in history where a person who is deemed by society—and that, of course, includes women throughout history—to be of less use. The very fact that he was allowed to live, let alone marry, and then have all of these people who came afterward. That’s pretty radical, man.MJL: I think so.BP: I really think so.MJL: I mean, I don’t know how you feel about this, Bethanne, but when you're at Smith incognito, in a way...BP: Uh-huh. Right, right.MJL: Exactly. Like when people don’t know you. And I, ‘cause I think it’s interesting about whiteness because whiteness hides so many things. Like, whiteness does not always equal power and privilege. I study this. Like, I’ve written about this for The Great Gatsby because The Great Gatsby is a novel about whiteness in America and about being an outsider. It’s not about black people. It’s about white people and people... Yes. Keep saying it’s a universal story, and it is, but it isn’t as well. It’s both things. And I think that we’d miss an opportunity to study whiteness in America when we don’t study The Great Gatsby, because every single important character is actually not from New York or New Jersey or elit…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Constructing Identities with SJ Sindu Mar 14, 2025
    Show notes

    On this week’s episode Bethanne sits down with author S.J. Sindu to discuss gender queerness and the importance of defining such a term, especially in the political environment of today. SJ’s newest book, Tall Water will be released in August of 2025 by HarperCollins.Should Revolutionary Road be kicked to the curb? Or should Richard Yates’ book be able to live in the canon? Bethanne believes it is ‘a perfect novel’, but can she convince you listeners as well?Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists. Titles include Devil is Fine by John Vercher, Self Made by Tara Isabella Burton, The Extinction of Experience by Christine Rosen, Orlando by Virginia Woolf, Fairest by Meredith Talusan, and Who's Afraid of Gender by Judith Butler.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned: Tall Water by SJ Sindu,Taylor Sheridan’s Yellowstone,The Language of Remembering by Patrick Holloway,Assignment in Brittany by Helen MacInnes,The Invisible Woman by Erika Robuck,The Skin and Its Girl by Sarah Cypher,A Memory Called Empire by Arkady Martine,The Night Watch by Sarah Waters,The Prettiest Star by Carter Sickels,Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo,Revolutionary Road by Richard Yates,Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy,The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald,100 Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez,Devil is Fine by John Vercher,Self Made by Tara Isabella Burton,The Extinction of Experience by Christine Rosen,Orlando by Virginia Woolf,Fairest by Meredith Talusan,Who's Afraid of Gender by Judith Butler,I Heard Her Call My Name by Lucy Sante.Transcript:Welcome to season two of The Book Maven, a literary review. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dig into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I'll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode. But first!This week, I talked to SJ Sindu about their new book Tall Water. Join us as we talk about gender queerness and the importance of defining such a term.BP: So, did you grow up in Massachusetts, correct?SS: Partly. I partly grew up in Sri Lanka, then I moved to Massachusetts and moved around Massachusetts quite a bit. In high school, I ended up in South Dakota. Wow. Okay. So quite a range there.BP: That is quite a range. Oh my goodness. And let's leave everything else out of the equation. That would have been a culture shock. What part of Massachusetts were you in when you left?SS: When I left, I was in the suburbs of Boston.BP: Oh my goodness. I can't imagine how jarring that must have been. And, and this is getting us to more of the main subject I wanted to talk with you about. So you're a teenager. You're coming into consciousness of yourself as a human adult, as a sexual being, and also as someone who, besides sexuality and all the other things that go along with adolescence, you're also figuring out your identity. At what point did you realize that you were in the category that we loosely use the term genderqueer for?SS: It took a while. I think I started to kind of be exposed to alternative genders and sexualities in my high school in Waltham, Massachusetts and Winchester, Massachusetts. It was a very open, progressive leftist environment. I had classmates and friends who were in a throuple as freshmen in high school. And I had queer friends, so I was being exposed to it. That was around the time when I was a freshman when 9/11 happened. Everyone was in this environment of political growth. We were all being forced to become politically active in one way or another because it was our generation that was going to fight the Iraq war and the Afghani war. We were becoming really outward-facing to the world in a way that many teenagers don't do until they're older.BP: I think this is such an important point that because of those stresses on our society and culture, you had to say, okay, we're going to be who we really are. We are not going to necessarily fit into any specific boxes that you make. There are bigger things to be faced.SS: Yes. And I saw a lot of my friends become really politically active in the wake of 9/11. I wasn't. But then I moved to South Dakota.BP: Well, that, and that is the next, thereby hangs a tale. So, you moved to South Dakota and what was that like? I don’t want to assume anything because I immediately think of South Dakota and I think of the TV series Yellowstone. I think of people conforming and having this idea and that idea, but I could be wrong. Maybe there was a thriving queer community where you were in South Dakota.SS: I wouldn't say thriving. We definitely existed. This was Sioux Falls, South Dakota in 2002. It was very small, very conservative, very religious—religious as in very specifically, there were like three churches that people went to. There was a literal cornfield across the street from my high school. But it was still, sort of, a city. There was some diversity to be found. There were like five of us that were kind of questioning sexuality, questioning gender in our school. Gay marriage was legalized in Massachusetts after I left, and I was like, okay. In South Dakota, though, it became a hot-button issue in our school. There were physical fistfights about the issue of queerness. There were teachers who would yell at students if they held hands in the hallway if they were queer. There was no support to be found, so we had to support each other. At that point, I wasn't really concerned about me. I was more trying to be an ally because I wasn't dating. I wasn't allowed to date. I'm from a South Asian family, so I wasn't allowed to date. So for me, queerness really started with trying to help the community as an ally. And then when I went to college, I found a thriving group of queer people, a thriving queer community in Lincoln, Nebraska, of all places. And that's where I was like, oh, I don't think I'm straight. I don't think I'm cisgender. And within two years, my sophomore year of college, I had come out first as bisexual, then I started to use the word queer and then specifically as genderqueer.BP: As someone who's much older and doesn't feel I can take on the queer identification too easily or in a flippant way, I just want you to, do you alternate between the way you present? And I think that is important because that might also affect your fiction.SS: That's a great question. When I was younger, I definitely tried to present more masculine because I felt like, and it's not just my feeling, this was the general culture in the queer community that "real" androgynous people or "real" non-binary people dressed in an androgynous way. And if you didn’t dress more masculine, my genderqueerness wouldn't be believed. So for me, it has always been an internal thing, never an external thing. I love fashion, I love style, I love makeup and jewelry, and things that bling. Externally, I love all of those things. I love femme presentation and femme fashion, as well as butch presentation and butch fashion. I just love the way fashion and style can communicate important details about us, including gender. I’m fascinated by that on a scholarly level. But when I was younger, I felt like I had to participate in it so that people would accept that I was genderqueer. Now, the culture has completely changed, and it is a free-for-all, and I love it. When I tell young people that I’m genderqueer, and I may have red lipstick and a skirt on, they’re just like, "Okay, great," and they move on, and it’s wonderful. We've achieved that sort of freedom now. The only thing they ask me is why genderqueer and why not non-binary or agender or other non-binary labels.BP: Well, let's talk about that. That's exactly it because I think—and I'm going to say what I think just so we can see it's kind of like a game show—how close can Bethanne come to this? You know, I want to say, your thoughts about taking on what the community believed, taking on certain masculine kinds of hair, clothes, et cetera... You know, I went to Smith in the '80s and believe me, Birkenstocks were very political then. Now we all wear Birkenstocks, right? And it doesn't matter. But there was a sense of if you liked lipstick, if you liked earrings, you don't tell me you're a lesbian, being with that red lipstick on. I saw a lot of people go through that. I instead was given a pin that said “hopelessly heterosexual,” and yet, and this is why I'm so interested in what you're saying about the strides that have been made. I think of myself completely—my mind is so queer, right? And that it has nothing to do with my long-term cishet monogamous marriage. It has nothing to do with anything except how I feel about what you're saying: anything goes. And it's wonderful. One of my favorite celebrities in the world is Alan Cumming, and Alan Cumming can put on a full suit, put on a dress, put on a big brooch, do whatever he likes. So to me, that gives you this internal freedom that you can then put on the page. Am I getting closer to that?SS: Yes, I think for me, the fiction is definitely a big part of the genderqueerness. I don't know what it's like to feel like a gender. I never have. Internally, I don't know what people mean when they say that. It's fun for me to inhabit my characters. As a fiction writer, I need to be able to sink into characters regardless of gender. I love being able to write from the masculine perspective, from men's perspectives. I find that malleability in gender really fun to do in a creative way. And that's how it really bleeds into my fiction—being able to get into the heads of characters regardless of their gender.BP: One last thing about the term genderqueer. You were mentioning a little while ago about people saying, "Well, why not non-binary? Why not this? Why not that?" And I thought, well, what you were saying about never feeling one gender or the other for whatever reason, it seems to me that genderqueer is actually the most descriptive term for you from what you've said to me today. So I just wanted to get your perspective on that and then we can definitely let you get back to a very busy Thursday.SS: I think it is the most accurate for me, mostly because, while I do use non-binary sometimes, and there is that non-binary umbrella under which I fall, genderqueer to me is an active term because of the word queer. Queer is a political term, it always has been, at least for the last 50 years. It's a term that's been successfully reclaimed, and it is connected to both artists and activists and also academics. And I'm all three. For me, genderqueer calls back that lineage of community care, community activism, and transformative justice, and that's the kind of lineage I always want to think of.BP: And that's a lineage I know you are now passing on to students and to people all around, whether genderqueer or allies, who need to learn more about it.SS: Yes, as some of my students have called me an elder gay, and I’m like, "I feel too young for that label!" But, I mean, it is important in a community to have that kind of intergenerational contact and communication, specifically for the queer community because of the AIDS crisis and because it was ignored for so long, we have lost so many of our elders. It is really my generation that has to step in and guide younger people because otherwise our heritage will be lost.BP: Thank you Sindu for joining us this week. You can find all of Sindu’s bookswherever books are sold. Now, let’s move on to Friday Reads, where we’ll see what you’ve been reading this week.Welcome back to another set of Friday Reads posts that we're going to sort of deconstruct, if you will, as usual, I've got my producer Jordan here to look at them with me. And Jordan, what do we have up first this week?Yeah, Melina, who's reading The Language of Remembering by Patrick Holloway, and she had an image of a book jacket with birds turning into alphabet letters, as a man thinks.BP: You know, I really like this one because it's such a fresh release. This book is, I believe it may be out in the United States now, as well as in the UK, but Patrick Holloway is an award winning writer in Ireland. I love this book jacket because I'm not sure if the birds are turning into letters or the letters are turning into birds. There's a man on a park bench. There's a woman coming close to him. And so it's just a very, very cool looking book and like his protagonist, and I'm going to mangle this name. I believe you say Oisin, is the man's name, O I S I N. But like Oisin, the protagonist, Holloway, the author, spent quite a bit of time in Brazil. He, in fact, completed his doctorate there. And so in this book, there's a little bit of auto fiction. We've got Oisin returning to Ireland from Brazil. He's got a partner and a child. And when he gets back, he discovers that he has a completely new outlook on how language contributes to personality. And that includes the language that his grandmother with dementia now uses really. One of my favorite recent characters in contemporary fiction, this grandmother, so check her out. I would say if you love Colm Toibin and Enright and Topé Folarin, who has been a friend of the pod, I think you might really appreciate The combination of authorial experience along with a little bit of fiction added in. So what's next?JA: Up next, we've got from Thomas, and I'm going to have a little bit of a pronunciation disclaimer myself. He's reading Assignment in Brittany by Helen MacInnes. And he shared an image of a potboiler paperback cover priced at 50 cents, perhaps in the 1950s.BP: Yeah, actually, this is funny, because I thought you were going to say Helen MacInnes. And I didn't know you were getting Brittany to Brittany. I've been there and I still don't know how to pronounce it. That is so great. Assignment in Brittany. And I love this cover that Thomas has put up. Because It's just seeing the 50 cents and, and it's the little C without the tiny lines at top and bottom that we usually see when we've had the cents symbol these days, it's, you know, a very distinct font.And actually, this book was written in 1942 or published in 1942, I believe. And so I don't even know where the cover comes from, but McInnes wrote 21 thrillers. Okay. And for a woman in 1930s, 40s, 50s, uh, England and America, that was a pretty great literary career. She was inspired by her husband, Gilbert Hyatt.I think that's how you say that name. He was an intelligence operative for MI6, and they traveled together quite a bit. And this particular book was inspired by their honeymoon in Bavaria in the late 30s. So McInnes herself took very careful notes about the growing power of Nazis in Germany. Hmm. I wonder what this is reminding me of.But she used a lot of her observations to great effect in this tale of a British agent who disguises himself as a Breton farmer during World War II to help the French Resistance. And if you love World War II fiction, there's so much. There's Graham Greene. There's Alan Furst. There's Ariel Lawhon's Codename Hélène. There's so many. Um, The Invisible Woman by Erika Roebuck. McInnes is OG espionage royalty, so, uh, check her out. I don't think many of us read Helen McInnes anymore, so, Jordan, thank you so much for that one. What do we have for our third Friday Rea…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Living in History with Lauren Francis-Sharma Mar 07, 2025
    Show notes

    In this episode of the Book Maven: A Literary Revue, Bethanne Patrick sits down with Lauren Francis-Sharma to talk about the intense nature of covering hearings on apartheid practices in South Africa and translating those experiences to her new book Casualties of Truth.This week we put Albert Camus’s The Stranger to the test. In this installment of Canon or Can It?, we’ll discuss the French author’s writing style and philosophy and decide if it should live on as a canonical text, or be kicked to the curb forever.Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists. Titles include: Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves by Adam Hochschild, Wake: The Hidden History of Women-Led Slave Revolts by Rebecca Hall and Hugo Martinez, The Unseen Truth: When Race Changed Sight in America by Sarah Lewis, Born a Crime: Stories from a South African Childhood by Trevor Noah, You Will Be Safe Here by Damien Barr, Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel Wilkerson.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned:Casualties of Truth by Lauren Francis SharmaThe Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham JonesMy Heart is a Chainsaw by Stephen Graham JonesDoll Seed by Michele Tracy BergerConsumed by Greg BuchananAfter Death by Dean KoontzReal Tigers by Mick HerronBicycle Diaries by David ByrneBury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves by Adam HochschildWake: The Hidden History of Women-Led Slave Revolts by Rebecca Hall and Hugo MartinezThe Unseen Truth: When Race Changed Sight in Americaby Sarah LewisBorn a Crime: Stories from a South African Childhood by Trevor NoahYou Will Be Safe Here by Damien BarrCaste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel WilkersonThe StrangerAlbert CamusFull Episode TranscriptWelcome to season two of The Book Maven: A Literary Revue. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dig into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I'll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode, but first, this week, Lauren Francis-Sharma joins the show to talk about writing her third novel, Casualties of Truth.Lauren explains the intense nature of covering hearings on apartheid practices in South Africa and the process of communicating those learnings through her novel. Join us now as we discuss the origins of her book.BP: So Lauren, I am really delighted to be here with you and you have got Casualties of Truth, your new novel, your third novel, correct? Very exciting. It is coming out, and it is about a woman who lives in Washington D. C. with her family, well Bethesda, Maryland, with her family. And she in the past, in the 1990s, spent some time in South Africa. She's an attorney. And the novel, starts out in the present day in Washington, and someone her husband has hired for his company turns out to be someone who was very important to her in that past in South Africa. So, what I want to talk with you about today is your time in South Africa, since I know you had that, and the question of what it's like to write about a place that was very formative for you as a person and as a writer. So maybe we could start with what it was like to write Prue and to start hearing her memories. Do you remember when that came up?LFS: Yeah, I think so. You know, I started thinking about this book in, while we were in quarantine during COVID. It's an interesting thing that happened to me while we were sort of stuck in our homes was this flooding of memories, reaching for places. And part of this was, I think I needed to do it for my own sort of mental health was just going back to the places that I felt were very, like you said, formative, but also really important to sort of who I'd become. So in my memory, I kept going back. to Johannesburg in 1996 when I was there and I couldn't figure out why I kept going back to like certain places and certain things, but it was just a repetitive memory. And before I knew it, I started to think, well, maybe this is the budding of a story. So in some respects, you know, Prue came up through that moment, or those moments where I was just stuck on that time in my life.BP: Tell us about that time. Why did you go to South Africa in 1996? What were the circumstances? How long were you there?LFS: Yeah, it was a semester. Well, a little longer than a semester, actually. But it was my third year of law school. I was at the University of Michigan, and one of the professors thought it would be an incredible opportunity, given that they just had, you know, two years earlier, their first democratic elections. He thought it'd be wonderful to sort of have a group of students go to South Africa and work on things. And there was just, it was a small group of us and we were all assigned to different. jobs. And my job was at a small law firm in Johannesburg, and they were supporting the ANC, particularly helping, you know, ANC members who wanted to apply for amnesty. As you well know, you know, there was a lot of activism, you know, in the decades before Mandela was released and before the elections. And so a lot of people committed what would be considered crimes and they wanted to, wanted to sort of have the government overlook those, those transgressions that they've made. And it was a very long application process. So I was helping people with the applications.And, you know, it just so happened that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's amnesty hearings were being held in Johannesburg while I was there. It moved around the country quite a bit. I just got lucky that a couple of weeks happened to coincide at the same time that I was in Johannesburg, and so I attended those hearings.BP: Specifically, what you felt you learned, and what you did learn that came to you as you started this writing process?LFS: How much time do we have? So, you know, I think the first thing that I'd like to say about that question is that I believe and I believe I've always been this way. And I know that I write for people who are this way, which is the sense for those people who are, who feel connected, feel globally connected, who feel like the world is important to them. I'm someone who I read everything from everywhere in the world and I write for people to be able to see themselves in whether it's a small village in Trinidad, which was, you know, my first book, whether, you know, it's a, you know, a Black woman from America in South Africa bringing the pieces together who, by the way, is also of West Indian heritage. So there's, you know, there's this real sense that she's you know, bringing in all the pieces of her into this story. So I think that being in South Africa at that time made me realize just how close we are. But on a practical level, you know, the national party, they were looking to the Nazis. The national party, they were looking at Jim Crow laws in America. And as we see now, you know, here in our country, we have people who are looking at the Nazis. And what they did. We have people who are looking back at apartheid South Africa. It's all connected. If we do not understand what happened in South Africa, we cannot know what could happen here. If we don't understand what happened in Nazi Germany, we cannot understand what can happen here. If there's anything that I'd like for someone, and obviously I wrote a book. For entertainment. Yes. And I wrote about, you know, a woman who's, you know, sort of living a very contemporary 2018 life and kind of grappling with motherhood and, you know, and marriage and all those things. But ultimately, it's about community and remembering that, like, South Africa would not be free of apartheid if it were not for community centric, community action people. And I, you know, and I think we lose sight of that so much. We lose sight of how important it is, how serious it is to care, to experience and to be with other people in their pain, to act on behalf of other people. We can get really caught up. I mean, this is what they want. They want us to be individualistic. They want us to think only of ourselves. We cannot dismantle anything thinking only of ourselves. And my character does this, by the way, she is very self centered.BP: What was the hardest thing for you to bring back, to make come alive?LFS: Bethanne, when you're sitting in a place and you're hearing about the murder of eight children, I don't know how you convey that, you know, I, and I did my best and you know, the story that I heard, one of the stories that I heard was about eight boys who and when I say boys, I mean, literally, they were boys, and they like many Black young South Africans wanted to fight against the apartheid system and wanted to be part of the ANC activism and, they were tripped by a South African police operative told that he was going to take them to another country to do training, to be soldiers of, for the ANC. And their parents didn't know. And they snuck off with this man. And they were tortured and they were murdered and during those hearings is when their parents when I was listening to it is when their parents learned what happened to their children. The weeping in that room. How do you, how do you convey that? I did my best. You know, I did my best without sort of you know, numbing the reader. But just trying to convey sort of the everyday horribleness of living under that regime. So that was the most difficult part, was trying to do just enough and not to overwhelm the sensory, the sensory experience of, you know, of a reader,BP: It reminds me of Hannah Arendt's ‘Banality of Evil,’ but it is very difficult because of the banality of evil to bring across what it does to the parents, as you said, to the people in this courtroom, who have to hear about these facts for the first time, these brutal, brutal facts. And so I imagine this book that you began during the pandemic has been really, really tough for you. It hasn't been an easy book to write.LFS: I did not know how to tell this story, and when I figured it out during COVID, it felt like such joy, from right from one writer to another, it just felt like such joy to be able to figure out how I was going to do it so that you wouldn't put it down. I hope you don't put it down so that you feel like you can't put it down. So I'm not a suspense writer, but certainly there were suspenseful elements, and if there was any hard part of it, it was actually just trying to maintain the very sort of fast pace that I began with and ensuring that sort of you would get the, you would get the entertainment while also really learning about the history, learning about this moment. But, you know, if I can say anything, which I sort of alluded to before, which is that, you know, apartheid policies, the National Party won in 1948 and you know, they won on a platform of apartheid. Believe it or not, no one thought they were going to win. It was a huge shock to South Africans. Now, mind you, most South Africans couldn't vote, but even the white people in South Africa were surprised when this very far right party won. And you know, you kind of want to start the story of South Africa in 1948 in terms of apartheid policies, but in truth, there were regulations in place since the 1920s since the 1800s. There was a slow drip drip, a slow taking away of rights that began long before the National Party won that election. And I just like to sort of make people aware of how small and slow these things begin to happen.BP: Thank you, Lauren, for joining us this week. You can find all of Lauren Francis-Sharma's books wherever books are sold. Now let's move on to Friday Reads where we'll see what you've been reading this week.Welcome back to another week's Friday Reads from all around the socials. This season, as you've heard before, we're highlighting fewer posts and digging a little bit deeper into the titles that people are sharing. So, let us know if you like the new format. Who knows, you might show up in it. As always, my engineer Jordan is here to help.So, what is our first book share this week?JA: All right, first up, we've got from Rob Bedford, my hashtag Friday Reads, Dead Tree Edition is The Buffalo Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones. And Bethanne, I think this is an early copy?BP: It is, and actually, and I'm kind of glad that I get the chance to Correct you on the title because it is the Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones. It's two hunters, two in one. And so it's a kind of an, it's an amazing title, but Jones is a member of the Blackfeet Indian tribe. I don't know if they're actually a nation and I did try to check that and wasn't able to find it. So please, if I am in error and it is the Blackfeet Indian Nation, I stand corrected, but Jones is one of the most interesting horror writers out there. If you've never read his work before, I highly recommend My Heart is a Chainsaw. Love that title. The Buffalo Hunter Hunter, is his newest, actually he's Dr. Jones, he has a PhD in English. It's the newest of his nearly two dozen novels, and it's about a Lutheran minister, a vampire and an Indian reservation in 1912. Just fantastic horror. It is for fans of Paul Tremblay, Amakatsu, and Oyinkan Braithwaite. So, I think that was a really fun one, Rob Bedford. Glad you put it up. Thank you. Next.JA: Next up, we've got from Lisa Eckstein, who just started the story collection, Doll Seed, by Michele Tracy Berger. What she bought after hearing the author on our opinions.BP: I love this because Michele Tracy Berger is a highly credentialed and respected academic with a PhD in religious studies and all kinds of fabulous, you know, affiliations and publications, but she's now also a speculative fiction author. And this collection of short stories is, according to one blurb, black mirror with the emphasis on black. It's about stories focusing on women and often these stories do include dolls or other sort of, I don't know what you would call them fictional creatures or figures, but it came out in paperback last year and I haven't read it yet. I'm really looking forward to it. Love Lisa Eckstein, The Psychedelic Book Jacket, that is on Doll Seed, and this is a great read if you like Alyssa Cole, Zakiya Dalila Harris, or N.K. Jameson. So, I have a feeling it's going to pick up a lot of readers. How about our third and last today, Jordan?JA: All right, we've got, to close things out, from Matthew Craig, who's cross posting from the other place, his Friday reads this week are Consumed by Greg Buchanan, After Death by Dean Koontz, and Real Tigers by Mick Herron.BP: Now, I chose this one, Matthew Craig, because I love the fact that number one, you chose three different books in three different formats. But number two, there's no image. You're kicking it old school with Friday reads. So you're reading Buchanan in the paper format, the Koontz as an electronic book, a digital book, and Real Tigers you're listening to in audio. And all three of these authors are really different, but really terrific. And I just want to put a little shout out in here for Mick Herron. I am a huge Slow Horses fan, the series that Mick Herron writes. And I have not read all of them. I really need to read more of them and I want to recommend them to other people because from what I understand from friends who have read the books, it's so rare, Jordan, that I'm the one who has seen the adapta…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Christopher Bollen's Last Resort Feb 28, 2025
    Show notes

    Season two is in full throttle now and we cannot wait to keep spoiling you listeners! In this episode of the Book Maven: A Literary Revue, Bethanne Patrick sits down with Christopher Bollen to talk about writing characters of all ages and grounding them with location and setting.King Lear is discussed in this week’s Pop! Goes the Culture, and all of its various adaptations. From queens to musicals, John Lennon to fictional rewrites, there is a version of King Lear for everyone to love.Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists. Titles include The Book of Love by Kelly Link, The God of the Woods by Liz Moore, Long Island Compromise by Taffy Brodesser-Akner, The Garden by Claire Beams, Our Evenings by Alan Hollinghurst, and Wild Houses by Colin Barrett.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned: Havoc by Christopher Bollen, Death on the Nile by Agatha Christie,Shattered and My Beautiful Laundrette and The Buddha of Suburbia by Hanif Kureishi, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly by Jean-Dominique Bauby, Lucy Greeley's Autobiography of a Face, Easy Beauty by Chloe Cooper Jones, In the Forest and A Pagan Place and The Country Girls by Edna O’Brien, Dublin Murder Squad (series) by Tana French, Small Things Like These and Foster by Claire Keegan, Death of the Author by Nnedi Okorafor, King Lear by William Shakespeare, “The Yiddish King Lear” and “Mirele Efros” by Jacob Gordin, “Vision of Lear” by Tadashi Suzuki and Toshio Hosokawa, A Thousand Acres by Jane Smiley, “Succession” by Jesse Armstrong et. al, The Book of Love by Kelly Link, The God of the Woods by Liz Moore, Long Island Compromise by Taffy Brodesser-Akner, Fleischman is in Trouble by Taffy Brodesser-Akner, The Garden by Claire Beams, Our Evenings by Alan Hollinghurst, and Wild Houses by Colin BarrettEpisode Transcript:BP: Welcome to season two of The Book Maven, a literary review. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dive into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I'll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode, but first…CB: At first, I was thinking, "Let's talk to Chris about writing a character who is not at all like you. Okay, you know, an elderly woman." But then I thought, maybe it's more interesting to talk about writing a character who seems not to be like you at all, but really is like you.Yes. I mean, I think those are almost the same question.BP: Thank you. Please elaborate.CB: Um, well, you know, you always hear that old chestnut, "Write what you know." And I feel like, without meaning to, I sort of did in all of my previous books—uh, all five of them. Without really realizing it, they all kind of involve young people, semi-good-looking urbanites moving through the world. You know, that—BP: That can't be you, Chris, because you are totally good-looking. Okay, go ahead.CB: I did not mean to turn that into a compliment for myself. No, but just like my own age, and, um, it's sort of like these travelers, and, uh, I was actually, you know, so inspired to do Maggie that, once I got outside of myself—once I kind of stepped into the shoes of this 81-year-old, maybe homicidal widow—I felt like it was finally freeing.I finally felt like I could reach for high branches and do wild turns. It somehow opened me up and liberated me in a way that I think I was so hemmed in by writing my own experience that it had the opposite effect. I felt like I could do so much more getting outside of myself, and that's probably because, at heart, I'm an 81-year-old homicidal widow.No, it's… it's at heart because, uh, one, I do love... I've, you know, I think that what Calgary says, you—uh, I think when you're writing about someone who's 81, they've earned their wisdom. They're at an age where you can actually give them intelligence, wit, and a life of experiences. Whereas, when you're writing, say, like a 23-year-old, you always feel like you're making them— even though they're an adult—too precocious, or too well-lived, or too wise for their years.And so you're kind of always holding back a little bit. Um, and yet, for some reason, it was just so freeing to write someone who was 81 because she's earned it all, you know? She can say whatever she wants. And so it was me, but in this like, free way where you kind of can speak your mind, and, uh, you give her the benefit of the doubt.BP: This is such a turnabout to Patricia Highsmith writing Tom Ripley, uh, which is, I mean, you might be an 81-year-old woman at heart.CB: Thank you. She might have been a 20-something gay man at heart.BP: Uh, yes, but on… but on the other hand, as you say, in writing younger characters—I'm working on a character who is going to be aging throughout the course of a book right now.CB: Mm. And I have been. That's—BP: Interesting.CB: Yes. You know, because I've been thinking about that very thing. How do I take her from age 9 or 10 all the way to 60 or 65? And how do I make sure that she is not sounding the same all the way through? So that's a real concern. However, the joy, as you point out, about Maggie Burkhart is that you can give her the wisdom and the wit and the perspicacity of someone who is an octogenarian.BP: And of course, that also—and this is what is so delicious about Havoc—is it gives her the perspective of seeing that this child is not as sweet and innocent as everyone would like him to be. So, talk about that. Talk about how Maggie actually is able to see through this little boy's, um, you know, the easy appeal that children of his age have for other adults.CB: Well, I think in a way, I mean, even though they're sort of at opposite bookends of the life shelf, you know, um, at the very ends of life on each side, uh, they're almost treated similarly—the elderly and the very young—because in children, because they're the person in the room whose opinions you don't listen to, or the person who's overlooked, who's just sort of blends in.An old person or a child, you know? And they're also, uh, it's because, you know, they're not self-reliant, or they're not perceived as self-reliant. So, uh, they're these sort of characters that sort of fall into the background of rooms. And so, in a way, they're both suffering the same condition. They both kind of are lonely creatures that want to be seen and want to have agency in the world, but have none.And so that really interests me—writing about age. And that was one of the reasons I wanted to tackle it. Obviously, it came out of the pandemic. And in that period, there was this whole conversation: do you sacrifice the old for the young, or the young for the old?So, in a way, I wanted to sort of literalize that war between generations. I mean, this should have been a story about a sweet old lady who kind of takes on the grandmotherly role of a cute little boy. But, um, instead, it's, you know, the inverse in this crazy world that we live in.Because I think they’re both manipulative and learn how to exploit that perception of them as sort of these half-formed beings. And so, uh, that was really fun to play with. I mean, that was really exciting to work with, on both ends of the spectrum, with, uh, Otto as much as with Maggie. And actually, I found it much more challenging to write about an 8-year-old boy than I found to write about an 81-year-old woman.Especially an 8-year-old boy with an agenda.BP: How do you write that character and yet keep him true to his life experience, his measure of wisdom, which is—it can't be the same as Maggie's, and yet they are, um, if you will, playing on the same field. They're trying, it's like this, this incredible, it's not even a chessboard. It's a game of Go, right? You know, they’re on different levels, and they’re crossing each other. And, you know, so he can't be the same as an adult, but he is working against an adult and with adults as his various pawns too.CB: Right. Right. I mean, in a way, I kind of thought of it as, in the first drafts, it’s like Maggie was sort of—Even though they were enemies, nemeses—like she was sort of mentoring him in this role of just destroying lives.And so, I, you know, it's so hard to write children for me. I don’t have any children. I’m not really around children that often. Um, I, you know, I have friends who have 8-year-olds. And so, I was paying a little bit of attention when I would come and visit to their, you know, way of speaking and their knowledge base.But I didn’t want, I wanted Otto to be brilliant without being a 31-year-old trapped in an 8-year-old’s body. We have that child so much in literature and in films, like the precocious child that knows it all and is way too smart for their age. And it’s so irritating. It’s kind of grating. And so I wanted Otto to be really, you know, quick-witted and shrewd, but also a child.Like, I wanted him to have these moments where he kind of breaks down like children do, or doesn’t understand the gravity of situations like children do, in the same way. And I think, you know, I kind of went back to when I was a kid when I was thinking of him. And I remember, oh my god, my class in, what, 4th grade, they were like wolves. They were like the most malicious children. We were all so horrid. So, I don’t think it’s a stretch, honestly. I think, you know, we like to think of children as so sweet and kind, but they are such cunning creatures, and they’re so observant.BP: And that’s what he is. You need to be observant to be a great manipulator. Like both of them, you have to be observant. And so they have this advantage in a way that they’re sort of watching from the outside in rooms. And so they’re paying close attention, and they’re using that information against the people, you know? They’re studying.When you talk about going back, and I haven't spoken to him about this, but maybe someday I'll get to speak with Amor Towles about A Gentleman in Moscow, because that is one of my favorite books set in a hotel, you know, being restricted to the walled garden kind of thing, the way you deal with Maggie.CB: Yeah.BP: Let’s talk about the hotel. Did you read other books before, during, or after that were set in hotels? Because I think that's really fascinating.CB: Well, I’ve always loved hotels. I mean, just as a traveler and as a person, I crave them. I adore them. I, you know, I really, I love—I love the fact that you can be a complete stranger, and you're in close contact with all of these other people, and somehow it's this sort of beneficent place, but you don't know anything about the other person. But you're behaving sort of on a semi-civil level.Um, and you kind of—it’s sort of like, it’s sort of this idealistic world where the class distinctions kind of break down. Everyone's on the same playing field. Of course, everyone has different sized rooms, but it's just an amazing and very rare moment of communality between, you know, or communion between strangers that’s, of course, prime for fiction and, uh, for great writing.Did I read any hotel novels? Um, there are, I mean, there's... you know, Agatha Christie obviously did like ultimate hotel novels. Um, you know, she was the queen of that. Because she understood that—I think she understood, like, how do you get a bunch of people into a limited space hotel?So, you know, that must have always been an inspiration for me for this book. And also, the hotel that I based Havoc on was where she wrote much of Death on the Nile. So isn't that amazing? Like, that was a very—that’s a little factoid about the Winter Palace, which is in Luxor.But you know, I tried—it’s so funny when—When I write about a place or an aspect or feature of something, I always try to run from it in terms of reading about it because I'm so scared of, uh, being inspired or, you know, being influenced by it. And I’m so easily influenced by things. I think that’s what makes me love writing about foreign places so much because I really just fall under the spell of them.But I also don’t feel like I have to be careful about that because, uh, it’s just so easy to enter someone else’s world.It is easy to enter that world and think you're writing something meaningful when all you're doing is throwing a bunch of details onto the page. You know, that's really, really tough.BP: One more question for you. What are you working on now — the previous novel, or something completely new?CB: Well, I want to tell you that another thing that was amazing about Havoc — unlike this book I'm working on now — is that I had the idea in one flash. I was staying at the Winter Palace, sitting in the back garden, right after the pandemic, and I saw this old American woman at a table next to me, berating a waiter about her lunch order in a way that was clear she'd had lunch there every day.And it just came to me — the whole story came to me in one moment. That has never happened to me before. You know, famously, Patricia Highsmith said she got the idea for Tom Ripley from watching a young man walking across the beach in Positano at dawn, and I always thought that was such a lie. I thought she was just being a showwoman about it. But this is very similar. The whole story came at once, and that made it really fun to play with all the elements of it because I knew what it was. This novel I went back to... it’s about a young man in Paris, also a murder.It's very hard to drop a novel and then try to pick it up two years later. It's like giving mouth-to-mouth CPR. You're trying to resuscitate the thing, trying to remember the initial spark that brought you to want to write about it. And so I'm kind of having trouble finding the spark again.I hope to. I always find the first paragraphs, the first sentences... I don't know about you, but they're so important to me because that's where all my enthusiasm lies.BP: Welcome back, readers, to another one of our Friday Read segments, where we take a few of your posts from mostly Blue Sky but other places online as well, and talk about what's mentioned. And I do this, of course, with my trusted and excellently well-read producer, Jordan Aaron. Jordan, how are you today?JA: I'm doing well. Ready to get through some Friday reads.BP: Excellent. So what do we have first?JA: Up first this week is a post from Nancy Brock, who’s reading Hanif Qureshi's Shattered from Echo Books. A fall at home, a life changed, a memoir celebrating the resilience of spirit and the triumph of the mind.BP: What a subtitle. I mean, that is a story in and of itself, just in a subtitle.And so, this is a true old school Friday Reads post Nancy Brock put up here. Just the hashtag and the title and the information, you know, about the author and the publisher. So you might remember we mentioned Qureshi in a recent episode because I was talking about memoirs and novels and all kinds of stuff.And we were talking about his 1980s hit, My Beautiful Laundrette, that was made into a film with Daniel Day Lewis back in the day. Qureshi is also very well known for other books, including The Buddha of Suburbia. In 2022, sadly, a sudden stroke left the writer without the use of his arms or legs. When he says a bomb went off in his life, he really means it.It was completely unexpected. I believe he was just watching, you know, the footie on TV, as one does in England. And next he was on the floor, and I believe He can wiggle his toes, but not much else. And this m…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Finding Truth in Memories with Jay Baron Nicorvo Feb 21, 2025
    Show notes

    Welcome back to season two! In this episode of the Book Maven: A Literary Revue, Bethanne Patrick sits down with Jay Baron Nicorvo to discuss accessing trauma while writing, differing points of view of traumatic events, and how our brain sorts through traumatic experiences. Bethanne touches on the highly anticipated Catcher in the Rye in this week’s Canon or Can it. Does she kick Holden Caulfield to the curb? Or let him stay with all of his teenage angst?Can Bethanne beat the clock? She gives us 6 Recs for our To Be Read lists. Titles include The Buried Giant by Kazuo Ishiguro, Memory Piece by Lisa Ko, Behind the Scenes at the Museum by Kate Atkinson, Memorial by Brian Washington, Someone by Alice McDermott, and The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley.Find Bethanne on X, Substack, Instagram, and Threads.The Book Maven: A Literary Revue is hosted by Bethanne Patrick, produced by Christina McBride, and engineered by Jordan Aaron, with help from Lauren Stack.All titles mentioned: Life B by Bethanne Patrick, Best Copy Available by Jay Baron Nicorvo, My Life by Bill Clinton, Greta Gerwig’s Little Women, Running with Scissors by Augustine Burroughs, Terror Westover's Educated, The Glass Castle by Jeanette Walls, Samantha Irby's Quietly Hostile, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit and The Passion by Jeanette Winterson, Angela Carter's The Magic Toy Shop, The Comfort of Strangers by Ian McEwan, Ann Patchett's The Magician's Assistant, Nevada by Imogen Binney, Jordi Rosenberg's Confessions of the Fox, Lucy Santé's I Heard Her Call My Name, Before We Were Trans by Kit Hayum, In Tongues by Thomas Groton, Faltas by Cecilia Gentile, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, The Buried Giant by Kazuo Ishiguro, Memory Piece by Lisa Ko, Behind the Scenes at the Museum by Kate Atkinson, Memorial by Brian Washington, Someone by Alice McDermott, The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley.Episode TranscriptWelcome to season two of The Book Maven: A Literary Revue. This season, we'll talk to leading authors, dig into the classics to decide which should stay in the literary canon, and I'll recommend some of my favorite books to you. We'll have all that and more in this episode. But first, Jay Baron Nicorvo joined the show to talk about accessing trauma while writing.Specifically, Jay talks about differing points of view of traumatic memories, the lack of ubiquity in cultural standards, and how it is that our brains sort through traumatic experiences. We get into some intense topics, so listener discretion is advised. Join us now as we talk about the final episode of MASH and how each of Jay's brothers remembers that event differently.BP: One of the things that's fairly early in your book, I think it's in chapter one, you talk about being with your two brothers and your aunt and uncle and you're, this is the quote ‘on the couch, we are five Americans and we are doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time as 106 million other Americans. We're all tuned in together to CBS to watch the final episode of MASH’. And the reason I wanted to start out with this Jay is because it is something that I have this very specific personal memory of. And you and I know that our memories are different, but one of the things you deal with right up front in Best Copy Available is the fact that even if you and your two brothers sat and talked about this, they would have different versions, wouldn't they, of that memory?JN: The divergence is kind of astounding. And I've talked with my brothers about what they remember of the different scenes that I'd narrate. And their point of views are wholly divergent from mine. To almost to a shocking degree. But that moment that you, that you narrate that MASH, that MASH moment, which so many Americans shared is kind of a cultural artifact. It doesn't really exist anymore. There is not this sort of unifying cultural endeavor that we all do at the same time. Those likes the scheduling has been democratized thanks to streaming and the internet and everything else. And so we're all doing those things, but we're doing them at different times. And so there was something, I think, just really. It was like a moment of an American universal and I think it felt important to capture it, but it also to work to convey some of the different themes that I was working with. Well, I mean, just your, your mention of memory. And I think all memoirs are basically about the same thing. They're all about memory and yet the narrative, the story that each individual tells in recalling those different memories is infinitely diverse and so I think I was definitely aware of that. And I was trying to keep in mind this idea of memory as being a very personal thing. But at the same time, wanting to maintain some sense that there is an objective reality that we all share, or call it whatever you will, I mean, there's a thousand different names for it, but our memories derive from a shared experience that is vast and all encompassing and like this capstone of of the MASH final episode the finale was I think something that we all shared a vast number of us shared at the same time and it was just a very vivid memory that I that and I wanted to kind of bring it into the story in part because it also gets at and foreshadows the sexual abuse that comes later on in the scene it's my uncle my beloved uncle and aunt who are babysitting us, but the reader at that point doesn't know who molested me as a child. All they know is that it was a babysitter. So I'm sort of setting up this universal American moment. And at the same time, I'm darkening it. I'm shadowing it with the potential for abuse. So I was very much aware of those things. And, and that was like one of those scenes, you know, and I'm sure you encountered this when you were working on Life B, memoirs that we write and publish, they're almost exercises in excision. I mean, the really difficult thing for me is what to leave out and to try to tell the story and to be as true to myself and my voice, but also to my family members and other people who have their own memories, to be as true as possible and not include everything, you know, it's not, you know, Life B and Best Copy Available are not My Life by Bill Clinton. Like we're not presidents. People don't want to know every single instant of our day, right? So because we're not these historical figures with, you know, cadres of historians and biographers. Pouring over every scrap of paper or every thought that we might have had, we have to really be selective in order to tell a story. And so one of the things that I do when I write is a scene or a character or a moment, it can't just be one thing. It needs to be multiple things. It needs to do a number of things at once. And so this MASH scene got at a number of things for me, and that was one of the reasons why I included it.BP: Well, you mentioned when we were talking beforehand about my chapter called ‘Little Women’, when my younger daughter and I go to see the Greta Gerwig’s Little Women a few years back. I can't even remember exactly how many years back. And we sit down and talk afterward about her experience of growing up with me during the worst years of my double depression. And that's, you know, part of what I was doing there as well, taking a cultural moment, a moment with me and a family member and, um, turning it into something that makes that moment in my life meaningful for other people, as you said, because we're not writing autobiographies. You know, we're writing memoir, and the good part of that, even though people don't know, want to know about every time, you know, we've had a meal or written a diary entry or whatever, is that we also have creative freedom. And your book, I think, you know, I feel like such a writing baby, like such a neophyte. I wish I'd gotten closer to what we now call creative nonfiction in Life B, uh, but Best Copy Available, I think is so strongly creative nonfiction or CNF. And that is because you use not just scenes and memories, but you also use senses so well. And so, there are a couple of other chapter one moments that I want to get to, and I want to connect them a couple of pages before the MASH memory. You talk about the way that writing is memory and a book becomes a mind. And so I thought, that is so beautiful. And I wanted to hear you explain it to, you know, bring that out a little bit more, Jay.JN: Well, you know, it's not, it's not my idea. Although, maybe those words are mine. One of the formative texts that I encountered as, I think as probably a sophomore at community college, and I don't know if it was assigned, we had to read a segment of Areopagitica that John Milton I think it was it was a delivery that he gave to to parliament and he talks about that speech in that speech, he's advocating for freedom of the press, basically, even, you know, hundreds upon hundreds of years ago, and he talks about the essence of books and that books are the essence of an individual that they do contain, you know, the purity of extraction and efficacy. And he goes on, and I can't remember the text exactly. But there was this idea that I encountered early on, and I think it was one that made me want to be a writer. Not just a reader, which is that a book sort of contained an individual, and even after that individual was gone, John Milton, you know, was hundreds of years buried, we can still glimpse inside his head. You know, and kind of rummage around in his thoughts. And so that was something that I was think that I was playing with and in memoir in that genre, you know, whether it's creative nonfiction or more like Bill Clinton's autobiography or, or the books that fall, you know, in the middle, they do, they try to, to capture a self, and for, I think, the creative nonfiction writer, for someone like me, who is schooled both in poetry and in fiction writing, published a novel, I was definitely pulling both of those elements. For poetry, it's an attention to language at the sentence level, and even smaller, right, the word and the syllable. For the novelist, it's, it's more large scale. It's the assemblage of scenes of characters moving through a setting and speaking dialogue. And so I was trying to borrow from both of those traditions to use in the memoir. And the thing that brings both of those together is fact. And I think this is a little bit different from truth. You know, we talk a little bit about our having our own truths. And I think another thing has gotten a little bit democratized in the current times is truth. We feel like we all have our own truth that we all have, you know, an entitlement to it, our experience of it. But I encountered this, this quote recently. It was like a JFK quote, and I'm going to paraphrase, but it was some, it was a speech he gave and he called the truth a tyrant. The truth is a tyrant, the only, like the only tyrant we should adhere to. And I think there's something about that that we've lost. I think we've really gotten attached to our very own personal identifiable experience and I think we've lost a little bit of touch with a kind of larger truth of reality or an experience that we all share a kind of history as it's going. And so I wanted to try to, you know, stay close to that. But at the same time, you're working in a genre memoir that demands intimacy of the utmost kind. I mean, you just have to be so focused on your individual story that sometimes I think we lose contact with the larger reality that's happening around us.BP: You're playing right into my hands, Jay. I love this because I'm going backwards in chapter one in a way and I love one of, in one section where you're considering all of this and you're considering the case of the writer versus the reader of memoir, and you say you're at my mercy, or am I at yours?JN: Yeah, yeah, it's definitely a give and take, you know, and I was aware that the subject that I'm dealing with, right, the book is about partly it's about my molestation as a kid, the hands of an older male babysitter, a teenager, and also my mom's violent rape. And so I'm aware as a writer that I need to make scenes and there needs to be drama and tension, and of course there's conflict in these subject matters. But also too, it's exhausting. I mean, it was exhausting for me as a writer. Devastating at times. And it's exhausting for a reader to have to sit through that. And so what you're, what you're expressing here is in part the breathing room that I tried to bring into the narrative to separate those what are really emotional and a powerful scenes with more reflective more, I don't want to say philosophical so much but more like kind of context cultural context or historical context or literary context,BP: But you're you put in here ‘Here are scraps of John Berger I cling to. The past is never there waiting to be discovered, to be recognized for exactly what it is. History always constitutes the relation between a present and its past.’ I'm not speaking very well while I'm reading, but ‘The past is not for living in, it goes on. It is a well of conclusions from which we draw in order to act.’ I thought, that is amazing. Because that's what we're doing. You said a few minutes ago, you know, we're digging around in this stuff. It's this well of conclusions. And we're all trying when we're writing memoir to figure out which conclusion or conclusions in the well we should pick up and turn around. And so no memoir can be the truth, no memoir is fully the truth.JN: No, it's just a, to extend that metaphor, it's just a bucketful. It's like, if the past is the, is the well that you're drawing from, like all we have is a bucket. And so we're leaving all of this water, not just in the well, but underground, the aquifer that feeds the water, like all of that is the past. And our tool, our vessel is just, it's so minuscule. It's one book.BP: My bucket has holes in it. I don't know about yours. But what I do know is that that is why you and all of the memoir writers I know that I truly respect and draw upon again and again, do adhere to fact as much as we can, because we can't get out the truth. We can use facts to show our own experience of the truth.JN: Yeah, and that was really important for me, and that was one of the most difficult things for me. You know, I have a really hard time writing scene, and you'd think, like, after publishing a novel and having written three other unpublished novels, or four, I've lost track of how many novels I've finished and failed to publish, but, scene is sort of like the building block for a novel and I thought coming to a memoir It would be easier for me to write scenes and it just never is and even when I'm drafting a novel I do the same thing it comes out an exposition first and then part of what I'm doing in revising is I'm going back and then I'm sort of like teasing out the dialogue and teasing out the action and I'm putting the the characters in space And so I had to do all that for this for this memoir too, and I'm just amazed each time at how difficult that is to do just to make scenes and get readers invested in a time and a space that's really specific and, and comes back to this point that you keep making. It's those sensory details. And that's when I think they're most moving for the reader. It's not when they're just like a list of senses. But you have the characters moving in space a…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    1 2 3 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Fresh Air

    1

    Fresh Air Arts
    Twenty Thousand Hertz

    2

    Twenty Thousand Hertz Arts
    The Black Tapes

    3

    The Black Tapes Arts
    Snap Judgment

    4

    Snap Judgment Arts
    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin

    5

    Here’s The Thing with Alec Baldwin Arts
    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc.

    6

    The NoSleep Podcast – Creative Reason Media Inc. Arts
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights