The Ben Ferguson Podcast

Copyright: 2024 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia

Latest Episodes:

50 Governors Put on Fraud Notice-Clean Up Medicaid or Face the Consequences Apr 24, 2026

Show notes

Federal Crackdown on Medicaid Fraud
CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, working under President Donald Trump’s administration, has initiated a nationwide effort to combat Medicaid fraud, citing billions of dollars in losses due to noncompliant and fraudulent providers.
All 50 Governors Put on Notice
Every U.S. governor—regardless of party—has received identical letters requiring immediate action, signaling that Medicaid fraud is viewed as a national, not partisan, problem.
Strict Deadlines Imposed
- 10 business days: Governors must confirm whether they will conduct rapid revalidation of high‑risk Medicaid providers.
- 30 days: States must submit a broader Medicaid provider revalidation strategy.
- Two‑year plan: States must outline long‑term methods for verifying provider legitimacy and compliance.
Focus on High‑Risk Providers CMS is prioritizing providers with:
- Weak enrollment standards
- Less rigorous billing oversight
- Missing or invalid National Provider Identifiers (NPIs)
  These providers are considered most vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse.
Escalated Federal Oversight Failure to comply with revalidation requirements will be used as a risk indicator of fraud and could affect future federal Medicaid funding decisions.
Law Enforcement Coordination States are instructed to work closely with law enforcement agencies, indicating that criminal investigations and prosecutions are expected to increase.
Catalyst: High‑Profile Fraud Cases Major scandals—especially in Minnesota and California—have intensified scrutiny:
- Minnesota’s “Feeding Our Future” case (~$250M)
- A state review estimating up to $1.7B in improper payments over four years These cases highlighted systemic vulnerabilities.
Potential Funding Deferrals CMS is considering Medicaid payment deferrals in states deemed noncompliant, setting the stage for legal and political conflicts between state and federal governments.
Policy Framed as Taxpayer Protection The initiative is presented as safeguarding resources for intended beneficiaries—low‑income individuals, seniors, children, and people with disabilities—by removing corrupt actors from the system.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

DOJ Says SPLC Cashed In on 'Hate for Sale' & Weaponized Activism Apr 24, 2026

Show notes

1. Allegations of Criminal Conduct by the SPLC (Primary Theme)

The document repeatedly claims that the Southern Poverty Law Center:

Was indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice and investigated by the FBI.
Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, and conspiracy.
Deceived donors by claiming to fight extremist groups while allegedly financially supporting those same groups.
Used shell companies and illicit banking structures to conceal financial transactions.
Funded multiple extremist organizations and figures over many years, including:
- Ku Klux Klan affiliations
- Neo-Nazi and white nationalist groups
- Individuals connected to the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville

The alleged total funding cited is millions of dollars, presented as evidence of a long‑term, intentional scheme.

2. SPLC Framed as Ideological Weapon

The text argues that:

The SPLC maintained “hit lists” and “hate maps” that allegedly targeted conservatives, Christians, and right‑leaning organizations.
Conservative groups (e.g., Turning Point USA) and individuals were labeled alongside extremist organizations, which the document portrays as irresponsible and dangerous.
The SPLC’s leadership is accused of becoming increasingly partisan after 2020.

The document presents SPLC as a political enforcement arm of the left, rather than a civil rights organization.

3. Claims Linking SPLC Actions to Violence

A significant claim in the text is that:

SPLC’s labeling and targeting of conservative groups allegedly placed individuals “in the crosshairs”.
The document asserts a connection between SPLC actions and a violent outcome involving a conservative figure, framing this as a consequence of the organization’s rhetoric and practices.

These claims are presented as vindication of long‑standing conservative warnings about SPLC.

4. Corporate and Donor Criticism

The document criticizes:

Major corporations for donating to SPLC without sufficient scrutiny.
Donors for allegedly enabling fraud, extremism, and conservative targeting through virtue signaling.
SPLC leadership compensation levels, portraying them as evidence of self‑enrichment.

5. Media and Institutional Cover‑Up Allegations

The text alleges that:

Mainstream media outlets downplayed or ignored SPLC wrongdoing.
Warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel in earlier years) were dismissed until now.
Government action came only after years of alleged misconduct.

6. Separate Segment: Medicaid Fraud Enforcement (Secondary Topic)

Toward the end, the document shifts away from SPLC to claim:

The Trump administration, through CMS and Dr. Oz, is aggressively addressing Medicaid fraud nationwide.
All U.S. governors were put on notice to re‑validate high‑risk Medicaid providers.
Large‑scale fraud cases in states like Minnesota and California are cited as justification.
The issue is framed as systemic, bipartisan, and urgent, with enforcement tied to federal funding.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Southern Poverty Law Center FUNDS the Klan, plus UCLA Law Students Silence Conservatives Apr 24, 2026

Show notes

1. Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

The Southern Poverty Law Center:
- Was criminally indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice.
- Funded or financially supported extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi organizations, and organizers of the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally.
- Engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, and donor deception.
The SPLC is operating a fraudulent fundraising model, allegedly exaggerating or manufacturing extremism to increase donations.
The SPLC funding of extremists is:
- Intentional
- Long‑term
- Central to its fundraising success
Corporate donors (Apple, JPMorgan, MGM, etc.) are cited as unwitting enablers, accused of donating for “virtue signaling.”

2. Media and Institutional Complicity

- Mainstream media ignored or covered up SPLC wrongdoing.
- Corporate America gave millions without oversight.
- Political and cultural elites protected SPLC due to ideological alignment.
Past warnings from commentators (e.g., John Stossel) are cited as evidence that concerns were longstanding.

3. Political Impact

The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville is described as:
- Financially linked to SPLC funding, according to the show’s claims.
- Used politically to attack conservatives and Donald Trump.
The SPLC allegedly used extremist events to drive massive fundraising growth, citing revenue increases after major controversies.

4. Free Speech and Campus Controversies

- A UCLA Law School event where progressive students allegedly disrupted and silenced a conservative speaker from the Department of Homeland Security.
The behavior is a “heckler’s veto”, framed as:
- Antithetical to free speech
- A sign of ideological intolerance on the left
Comparisons are made to similar incidents at Stanford Law School.
Law students are criticized as being unfit for the legal profession if they engage in such conduct.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Economic Strangulation-$500M a Day Lost in Iran plus Court Slams Brakes-VA Vote Voided Apr 23, 2026

Show notes

1. U.S.–Iran Ceasefire and Maritime Escalation

President Trump extended a ceasefire with Iran indefinitely while maintaining a strict naval and economic blockade, described as “economic fury.”
The administration claims the blockade is costing Iran $500 million per day, crippling oil exports and internal stability.
Despite the ceasefire extension, Iran allegedly attacked or seized multiple commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions.
Western and Iranian accounts conflict:
- Western sources report unprovoked attacks on vessels.
- Iranian state media claims ships violated rules and tampered with navigation systems.
Talks with Iran are framed as possible within 36–72 hours, but the administration insists the blockade will remain until Iran submits a unified proposal.
The Strait of Hormuz is emphasized as a critical global trade chokepoint, raising concerns about broader economic and security fallout.

2. Virginia Redistricting Referendum Voided

Virginia voters narrowly approved a referendum to return congressional redistricting power to the Democratic-controlled legislature.
A Virginia circuit court invalidated the referendum, blocking certification of the vote.
The ruling cited three main issues:
1. Procedural violations in how the amendment was placed on the ballot.
2. Misleading ballot language that may have confused voters.
3. Conflict with Virginia’s existing bipartisan redistricting commission, approved by voters in 2020.
The new maps would have allegedly shifted Virginia’s delegation to a 10–1 Democratic advantage, raising national stakes.
The case is expected to move to the Virginia Supreme Court, with implications for control of the U.S. House.
Republicans frame the ruling as a victory against gerrymandering; Democrats argue courts are overriding voter intent.

3. California Immigration Spending Allegations

The text alleges Governor Gavin Newsom spent $1 billion in state funds to support and import approximately 400,000 migrants.
Funds are said to have been directed to nonprofits and advocacy groups, including immigration legal services and activist organizations.
The narrative claims these groups:
- Coordinate resistance to ICE enforcement.
- Mobilize protests and political activism.
Migrant inflows are linked to:
- Rising housing costs
- Depressed wages
- Population flight (e.g., tens of thousands leaving Los Angeles County annually)
The commentary frames immigration as fueling a political machine, benefiting Democratic power while harming working-class Americans.
Historical comparisons are made to Tammany Hall–style political machines, arguing history is repeating itself.
Sanctuary city policies are portrayed as protecting criminals and undermining federal law.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

California’s Taxpayer‑Funded Illegal Migration Machine Apr 23, 2026

Show notes

Large-Scale Spending Allegation
- Claims California spent approximately $1 billion to bring or support 400,000 undocumented immigrants.
- Attributes these figures to a report allegedly from the Manhattan Institute.
Use of Public Funds
- Asserts state and federal tax dollars were directed to nonprofit organizations (e.g., Catholic Charities, Jewish Family Services, immigrant legal groups).
- Frames this funding as political kickbacks rather than humanitarian or service-based grants.
Political Organizing Accusations
- Claims immigrant-advocacy organizations function as political machines:
  - Organizing protests
  - Producing political messaging
  - Monitoring ICE activities
- Alleges coordination with Democratic political goals.
Social and Economic Impact Narrative
- Argues mass immigration:
  - Depresses wages
  - Increases housing costs
  - Strains public services
  - Drives longtime residents out of California
- Uses anecdotal housing examples to emphasize overcrowding and rent inflation.
Historical and Ideological Framing
- Compares modern Democratic immigration policies to 19th-century political machines (e.g., Tammany Hall).
- Frames migrants as:
  - Economic tools
  - Long-term welfare recipients
  - Future Democratic voters
- Uses language suggesting exploitation and dependency.
Criticism of Sanctuary Policies
- Strongly opposes sanctuary city laws.
- Frames limits on immigration enforcement as:
  - Encouraging illegality
  - Undermining public safety
  - Blocking federal authority

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Fake Victory, Iranian Shadow Fleet Lie Exposed plus FBI Expands Probe into Scientist Deaths Apr 22, 2026

Show notes

1. U.S.–Iran Conflict and Ceasefire Pressure

The U.S.–Iran ceasefire is set to expire, with President Trump threatening renewed bombing if negotiations fail.
Iran will not send a delegation to Washington, and JD Vance did not travel as expected.
Trump claims:
- The U.S. has destroyed Iran’s navy, air force, radar, missiles, and leadership
- The situation amounts to de facto regime change, even if indirect
- The U.S. fully controls strategic waterways (the Strait)
Trump frames negotiations as Iran having “no choice” due to military dominance.
He states willingness to continue or escalate military action as leverage in talks.

2. Disinformation and Media Narratives

Claims that 26 Iranian ships evaded a U.S. blockade are labeled as false and propaganda.
U.S. officials assert:
- Iranian vessels are being turned back or seized
- The so‑called “shadow fleet” is not bypassing enforcement
A Democratic senator (Chris Murphy) is accused of publicly celebrating false reports, which the speaker frames as politically and morally egregious.

3. Missing / Deceased U.S. Scientists Investigation

The FBI is leading investigations into at least 10 cases involving:
- Disappearances
- Unexplained deaths
- Homicides
Individuals were tied to sensitive facilities, including:
- NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Los Alamos National Laboratory
No confirmed link between cases yet; officials caution against conspiracy theories.
Some lawmakers raise concerns about possible foreign targeting (China, Russia, Iran).
Trump calls the situation “serious stuff” but hopes cases are coincidental.

4. DOJ Indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)

The DOJ announces an 11‑count indictment against the SPLC, including:
- Wire fraud
- False statements to banks
- Conspiracy to commit money laundering
Allegations claim SPLC:
- Secretly funded leaders of violent extremist groups (KKK, Aryan Nations, Nazi‑affiliated groups)
- Used shell companies and fake organizations to conceal payments
- Funneled over $3 million between 2014–2023
The SPLC is accused of publicly denouncing extremism while secretly financing it
The FBI and DOJ characterize this as a decade‑long, deliberate fraud scheme
Investigation is ongoing, with additional charges possible.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Southern Poverty Law Center Ran Covert Network While Denouncing the Same Groups Publicly Apr 22, 2026

Show notes

1. Alleged DOJ Indictment

The text claims the SPLC was indicted by an Alabama grand jury on 11 felony counts, including:
- Wire fraud
- False statements to a federally insured bank
- Conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering

2. Alleged Long‑Term Fraud Scheme

SPLC is accused of running a decades‑long fraudulent operation (dating back to the 1980s).
The alleged scheme involved raising donor funds to “fight” extremist groups while secretly funding them.

3. Alleged Funding of Extremist Groups

The document asserts SPLC funneled over $3 million (2014–2023) to individuals tied to extremist organizations, including:
- Ku Klux Klan
- Aryan Nations
- National Socialist Movement
- United Clans of America
- National Alliance
- American Front
Funds were allegedly used to support leadership and facilitate crimes.

4. Use of Shell Companies and Money Laundering

SPLC allegedly:
- Created fake organizations (shell entities) with no real operations
- Moved money through multiple accounts
- Loaded funds onto prepaid cards to obscure the money trail
This is framed as the basis for money‑laundering charges.

5. Alleged Role in Charlottesville “Unite the Right” Rally

A claimed SPLC source is alleged to have:
- Been part of online leadership chats planning the 2017 Charlottesville rally
- Helped coordinate logistics while under SPLC supervision

6. Statements Attributed to Officials

Claims are attributed to:
- Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
- FBI Director Kash Patel
Both are portrayed as asserting that SPLC:
- Lied to its donors
- Enriched itself
- Actively fueled extremist activity rather than dismantling it

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ted's Brand-New Book—A Biography of Clarence Thomas, Telling his Incredible Life Story and his Historic Impact on our Nation Apr 22, 2026

Show notes

1. Purpose of the Book

The book aims to:
- Tell Clarence Thomas’s personal life story, especially his rise from extreme poverty.
- Explain his judicial philosophy and jurisprudence in plain, accessible language.
It is based on approximately 9.5 hours of exclusive, one‑on‑one interviews between Ted Cruz and Justice Thomas.
Cruz emphasizes that the book is written for non‑lawyers, including students and general readers.

2. Clarence Thomas’s Background and Life Journey

Grew up in severe poverty in Pin Point, Georgia, raised primarily by his grandfather.
Initially spoke a Gullah/Geechee dialect, not English.
Experienced racism, hardship, family conflict, and personal struggles, including anger and a period of heavy drinking.
Attended seminary with the intention of becoming a Catholic priest, later leaving due to disillusionment.
Educated at Holy Cross College and Yale Law School.
Underwent a major ideological transformation, moving from left‑wing Black Power activism to conservative principles over many years.

3. Professional Rise and Historic Achievements

Faced career obstacles due to perceptions surrounding affirmative action.
Worked under Republican Senator John Danforth, which became a turning point.
Served in:
- The Reagan administration
- The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
Appointed in 1991 as the second Black Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
On track to become the longest‑serving Supreme Court justice in U.S. history (by 2028).

4. Judicial Philosophy (“Going Further”)

Thomas’s jurisprudence emphasizes:
- Originalism and the original meaning of the Constitution
- The belief that rights come from God/nature, not government
- A color‑blind Constitution
- Judicial restraint: judges should interpret and apply law, not create policy
His opinions are intentionally plain‑spoken and accessible, reflecting his background and respect for ordinary citizens.
The title Going Further reflects his tendency to push legal reasoning to its foundational principles rather than incremental change.

5. Confirmation Hearings and Public Attacks

The book examines the 1991 confirmation hearings, including:
- Allegations by Anita Hill
- Intense political and media attacks
Cruz draws parallels between Thomas’s hearings and later Supreme Court confirmations (e.g., Brett Kavanaugh).
Thomas is portrayed as enduring racialized hostility and vilification because of his conservative views.

6. Legacy and Moral Example

Clarence Thomas is presented as:
- A model of personal resilience, discipline, and principle
- Someone who maintained convictions despite decades of criticism
Cruz argues Thomas would be widely celebrated if he were liberal, but instead has been marginalized.
The book frames Thomas as a role model for principled living, not just for lawyers but for all Americans.

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump Warns Iran—Deal or Get Hit Hard plus Nearly One‑Third of Voters Say Deport Them All Apr 21, 2026

Show notes

1. Imminent End of U.S.–Iran Ceasefire

There is a temporary ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran is likely to expire without renewal, leading to renewed military escalation.
President Trump is signaling that bombing and military actions will resume quickly if Iran does not agree to U.S. terms.
Diplomacy is framed as exhausted, with force positioned as the next inevitable step.

2. Three Core Deal‑Breakers in Negotiations

The failure of negotiations is attributed to three major sticking points:

Iran’s Nuclear Program – The U.S. demands an end to uranium enrichment and dismantling of nuclear infrastructure; Iran refuses.
Control of the Strait of Hormuz – The U.S. is enforcing naval pressure while Iran threatens disruption, turning energy transit into leverage.
Sanctions Relief – Iran wants full sanctions removal; the U.S. demands changes in terrorism, missile programs, and regional behavior.

3. Strait of Hormuz as the Central Flashpoint

The Strait is the most dangerous and globally consequential pressure point, given that ~20% of global oil passes through it.
Any disruption could rapidly spike oil prices, destabilize markets, and trigger global economic fallout.
This conflict could quickly escalate from regional to global.

4. Expectation of Escalation, Not Containment

If the ceasefire expires, the text predicts:
- Renewed airstrikes
- Increased naval engagements
- Expanded cyberattacks
Iran’s regional proxies (Hezbollah, Iraqi militias, Yemen) are highlighted as risks for a multi‑front regional war, potentially drawing in Israel more directly.

5. Strategic Rationale for Ending the Ceasefire

The Trump administration is framed as believing:
- Iran is militarily and economically weakened
- Sustained pressure now could force a decisive outcome
Extending the ceasefire is depicted as allowing Iran time to regroup, whereas escalation increases leverage quickly.

6. Direct Impact on Americans

Americans would feel consequences through:
- Higher gas and energy prices
- Renewed inflation pressure
Energy disruption is a household economic issue, not just a foreign policy one.

7. Public Opinion on Illegal Immigration

Cites polling showing:
- Roughly one‑third of registered voters support deporting all illegal immigrants
- Strong bipartisan support exists for deporting illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes
The narrative argues that media and Democratic leaders misrepresent public opinion, while Trump aligns with voter sentiment.

8. Trump Invokes the Defense Production Act for Oil

Trump’s use of the Defense Production Act (DPA) is to boost U.S. oil production as:
- A national security move
- An economic stabilization effort
- A way to counter foreign energy leverage (Iran, Russia, OPEC)
Energy production is framed as being put on a “wartime footing” to rapidly increase supply and lower prices.

9. Energy Independence as Global Leverage

Increased domestic oil production is framed as:
- Reducing dependence on adversaries
- Lowering domestic inflation
- Strengthening U.S. negotiating power globally
Critics are prioritizing environmental or political goals over economic stability.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump Unleashes DPA on Energy Prices plus Dan Rather & the 200 Apr 21, 2026

Show notes

1. Invocation of the Defense Production Act (DPA)

Donald Trump is invoking the Defense Production Act to rapidly boost U.S. oil production.
The DPA is an emergency, wartime-style authority historically used for national crises (World War II, COVID-19).
Energy production is presented as a national security and economic emergency, not just an energy policy choice.

2. Purpose: Energy Independence and Cost Reduction

The stated goal is to increase domestic oil supply quickly and at scale.
Expected outcomes include:
- Lower gas and energy prices
- Reduced price volatility
- Increased economic stability for American households
Rising fuel prices are illustrated through personal anecdotes to emphasize urgency.

3. Mechanisms Enabled by the DPA

The Act is described as allowing the federal government to:

Prioritize oil-related contracts
Redirect resources (steel, labor, infrastructure) to energy production
Bypass or accelerate regulatory and permitting delays
Provide financial incentives or guarantees to producers

This is putting U.S. energy production on a “wartime footing.”

4. Geopolitical and National Security Framing

Increased oil production is framed as a way to:
- Reduce dependence on foreign producers (OPEC, Russia, Iran)
- Protect the U.S. from geopolitical energy shocks
- Strengthen America’s leverage on the global stage
Energy dominance is portrayed as synonymous with global influence and negotiating power.

5. Broader Economic Impact

Lower fuel costs are linked to:
- Reduced shipping and transportation costs
- Lower inflation
- Cheaper consumer goods (groceries, online purchases)
The policy is benefiting not just drivers, but the entire economy.

6. Criticism and Environmental Concerns

Critics are acknowledged, particularly those arguing:
- Environmental harm
- Market distortion from government intervention
These criticisms are dismissed as secondary to national security and economic relief.

7. Political Accusations Against Democrats

Democrats oppose lower gas prices for political reasons.
High energy costs are being used intentionally to:
- Create economic pain before elections
- Push consumers toward electric vehicles

8. Media Critique and Allegations of Bias

- Journalists
- The White House Correspondents’ Dinner
- Dan Rather and over 200 reporters
The media is:
- Coordinated
- Activist-driven rather than objective
- Losing public trust
Journalism is having evolved into political advocacy rather than neutral reporting.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Our TOPPODCAST Picks

Follow Us

Stay Connected

Related Podcasts

Links

Stay Connected