The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

Copyright: 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc. © Any use of this intellectual property for text and data mining or computational analysis including as training material for artificial intelligence systems is strictly prohibited without express written consent from iHeartMedia

Latest Episodes:

From Corrupt Nations to U.S. Neighborhoods Biden Let Them In Feb 17, 2026

Show notes

1. Claims about U.S. immigration and corruption

The U.S. has historically admitted immigrants from countries labeled as “highly corrupt” by Transparency International.
Examples mentioned include South Sudan, Somalia, Venezuela, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, among others.
Vetting immigrants from these countries is “nearly impossible” due to poor record‑keeping, bribery, and document fraud.

2. Reference to Trump administration policies

Donald Trump previously restricted immigration from certain nations via executive orders.
These restrictions were due to corruption concerns and an inability to verify documents from those regions.

3. Criticism of the Biden administration

The Biden administration continued issuing visas to individuals from these “corrupt” nations, citing specific visa numbers (e.g., Venezuelan admissions).
Allowing potentially unvetted migrants into the U.S.

4. Concerns about fraudulent documents

Applicants in corrupt nations can obtain fake documents—birth certificates, police records, passports, diplomas—via bribes.
This is presented as a major risk to U.S. vetting systems.

5. Political commentary on Democratic leaders

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Gavin Newsom are criticized for acknowledging migration problems while also condemning Trump’s approach.
Democrats are both:
- admitting migration has become “destabilizing”
- and simultaneously criticizing U.S. border enforcement agencies.

6. Claims of “chaos” caused by Democratic policies

The narrative argues that Democrats created disorder at the border and in U.S. cities.
The author asserts Trump is “cleaning up the mess” and that this angers political opponents.

7. Accusations of unfair comparisons to authoritarian regimes

Democrats comparing U.S. immigration enforcement agencies to authoritarian “secret police” or Nazi‑like forces.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump was RIght! There was Election Oversight Meltdown from Minnesota to Connecticut Feb 16, 2026

Show notes

1. Mentioned Voter Fraud Cases / Investigations

Michigan:
– Individuals convicted for forging signatures on nominating petitions.
Connecticut:
– Two defendants received suspended sentences/probation for improper handling of absentee ballots.
Wisconsin:
– Election clerks referred 46 suspected cases of irregularities after the 2024 election.
Ohio:
– Over 1,000 alleged voter‑fraud cases reportedly referred to the U.S. Department of Justice.

2. General Types of Alleged Irregularities Cited

Double voting
Improper registration
Ballot tampering
Non‑citizens allegedly registered or voting
Duplicate or incomplete voter‑roll entries

3. Minnesota Case Highlighted

A Minnesota state representative (Pam Altendorf) claims:
- Thousands of voter‑roll entries in Hennepin County contain missing information (e.g., names, addresses, birth dates).
- Possible duplicate voter records.
- Some voters listed as over 100 years old.
- The Minnesota Secretary of State allegedly attempted to block access to voter-roll data.

4. Broader Argument Presented

Voter fraud is widespread and growing.
Democrats are portrayed as resisting election‑integrity efforts, allegedly to maintain opportunities for cheating.
The narrative concludes with rhetorical questions about whether votes are secure and why certain politicians oppose stricter election measures.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dem Presidential Candidates Crash & Burn on Foreign Policy, plus Obama goes on the Attack Feb 16, 2026

Show notes

1. Democratic Candidates Struggle on Foreign Policy

At the Munich Security Conference, AOC, Gretchen Whitmer, and Gavin Newsom are portrayed as unprepared on major foreign‑policy questions.
AOC gives vague and confused answers regarding whether the U.S. should defend Taiwan against China.
Whitmer appears unsure when asked what “victory” in Ukraine looks like, deflecting the question to an ambassador.
Commentary suggests this reflects a broader weakness in foreign‑policy understanding among potential 2028 Democratic contenders.

2. Criticism of Far‑Left Ideology

The intellectual foundation of the far left is hollow compared to past decades.
They claim AOC’s comments reflect ideological simplicity, reliance on identity politics, and lack of deep geopolitical knowledge.
Suggestion that cultural Marxism and DEI-style frameworks have replaced rigorous foreign‑policy thought.

3. AOC’s Israel Comments

AOC is criticized for saying U.S. aid to Israel should be conditioned and alleging Israel committed “genocide” in Gaza.
The hosts argue her position is ideologically driven and historically insensitive, especially when stated in Germany.
They also claim Hamas statements contradict the genocide narrative.

4. Predictions About 2028 Politics:

- AOC will likely run for president.
- Chuck Schumer may encourage her to do so to avoid competing with her for Senate.
- If AOC runs, Mondaire Jones / Mondami (context suggests a progressive challenger) could run for Schumer’s Senate seat.

5. Obama’s Recent Commentary

Barack Obama is criticized for:
- Calling certain ICE actions “rogue behavior.”
- Comparing Republican messaging to demagoguery while presenting Democrats as unifying.
Hosts claim Obama is historically partisan and argue many current Democratic positions stem from his ideological influence.

6. Claims That Democrats Are Anti‑Law‑Enforcement

Gavin Newsom is accused of comparing American law enforcement to “secret police.”
The hosts argue Democrats are reviving rhetoric similar to segregation‑era resistance to federal authority.

7. U.S. Foreign Policy Under Obama and Biden

Allegations that Obama and Biden’s foreign policy empowered Iran and weakened global deterrence.
Claim that U.S. ambiguity over Taiwan is mishandled by the left.

8. Potomac River Sewage Issue

Over 1 billion gallons of wastewater spilled into the Potomac.
Washington, DC officials say repairs will take up to nine months, criticized as incompetence in government management.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Netflix Goes All-In as Foreign Money Targets Paramount Feb 14, 2026

Show notes

1. Netflix Emphasizes American Job Creation

Netflix highlights major growth in U.S. jobs: tripled its workforce in recent years.
Filming now occurs in all 50 states and 1,200 locations, supporting:
- 140,000 production jobs
- $225 billion in economic output
Netflix presents itself as expanding investment while others pull back.

2. New $1.2B New Jersey Studio Project

Netflix is building a world‑class production studio on a former military base in New Jersey.
Intended to bring filming back to the U.S. from places like the U.K.
Promoted as strengthening American production infrastructure and jobs.

3. Netflix–Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Framed as a “Vertical Merger”

Netflix argues its merger is complementary, not redundant, because:
- Netflix is newer to content production (only ~10 years).
- Warner Bros. brings 100 years of IP, an existing major studio, and theatrical distribution.
They say the combined assets would increase content output and maintain multiple buyers in the industry.

4. Paramount–Skydance Deal Portrayed as Risky “Horizontal Merger”

Paramount’s deal is a horizontal merger, which would create redundancies (“two of everything”) leading to major job cuts.
Example given:
- 3,500 jobs already cut due to the Skydance merger
- 15% CBS workforce reduction announced
- $6B in “synergies” (interpreted as more job cuts)
Netflix positions its own merger as job‑preserving, unlike the Paramount deal.

5. Foreign Investment Concerns

Paramount–Skydance deal involves more Middle Eastern equity than U.S. equity.
Concerns raised:
- Possible foreign influence on American media and cultural output
- Potential problems during CFIUS review or EU regulatory review, especially relating to news networks like CNN
Netflix contrasts this with:
- “An American deal with American dollars.”

6. Addressing Conservative Concerns About “Woke” Content

Netflix acknowledges conservative skepticism about its programming.
Reassurances offered:
- Netflix’s mission is to “entertain everyone,” across all political and cultural segments.
- Examples of conservative‑friendly content (e.g., Cobra Kai, military documentaries, faith‑based shows).
- Netflix highlights its free speech stance, citing the Dave Chappelle controversy as an example of resisting cancellation pressures.
- Netflix claims it does not operate in China because it refuses censorship demands.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Virginia is for Loving Liberal Policy, Tariffs on Trial at SCOTUS & Save America Act heads to the Senate Week In Review Feb 14, 2026

Show notes

1. Virginia Politics & Redistricting

Democrats in Virginia are moving quickly to enact policy changes after recent elections.
The new Virginia congressional map heavily favors Democrats (projected 10D–1R), despite the state split being closer to 53% Democrat / 47% Republican.
Comparisons to redistricting in Texas, California, and New England, arguing that both parties gerrymander but Virginia’s map is described as especially extreme.

2. Immigration Enforcement

Virginia’s governor (referred to as Abigail Spanberger) cut cooperation with ICE.
This policy could result in criminal undocumented immigrants being released into communities.

3. Discussion of Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Tariffs

Detailed recounting of a Supreme Court case involving presidential authority to impose tariffs.
Highlights:
- Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett expressed skepticism toward the administration’s position.
- Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito appeared more open to upholding the tariff authority.
Predicts that Chief Justice Roberts may write a majority opinion to uphold tariff powers on institutional grounds.

4. The “Save America Act”

House of Representatives passed the act with only one Democrat voting in favor.
The act requires:
- Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote.
- Photo ID to vote.
Presented as “common-sense” election integrity legislation.
Describes a procedural strategy within existing Senate rules, not abolishing the filibuster.
Would force Democrats to perform a talking filibuster (continuous floor speeches).
Requires Republicans to maintain 50 senators physically present, possibly for days or weeks.
Democrats aim to:
- Eliminate photo ID laws.
- Grant statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico.
- Offer citizenship and voting rights to undocumented immigrants.
- Pack the Supreme Court.

Voter ID and citizenship proof are extremely popular nationwide with broad bipartisan support.
Republicans should force Democrats to publicly defend opposition during a talking filibuster.

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Senate Hearing w MN AG Reveals New Details in Massive Fraud Scheme Feb 13, 2026

Show notes

1. Fraud and Political Accountability

Accusations that Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison failed to act—and may have helped—during a massive fraud scandal involving the Feeding Our Future program.
The scandal involved $9 billion in taxpayer money across programs, including $250 million in Feeding Our Future alone.

2. Connection Between Ellison and Fraudsters

Senator Josh Hawley confronts Ellison in a Homeland Security hearing.
Claims Ellison:
- Met with individuals tied to the fraud on Dec. 11, 2021.
- Was asked to “get investigators off their backs.”
- Allegedly agreed and offered assistance (based on recorded audio the text references).
- Received $10,000 in campaign donations from these individuals nine days later.

3. Hawley’s Claims During the Hearing

Ellison “pledged” help to the accused individuals.
He is accused of:
- Asking fraudsters to send names of investigators.
- Offering to contact investigators to question the scrutiny.
- Saying phrases like “Money is freedom,” according to transcripts cited.
- Taking campaign donations from individuals who were later indicted.

4. Accusations of Misconduct and Cover‑Up

Hawley alleges Ellison:
- Ignored whistleblower reports from 2018 and 2019 about fraud in the program.
- Failed to act until after meeting with accused fraudsters.
- Should be indicted and resign.

5. Alleged Destinations of Fraudulent Funds

According to testimony referenced:
- Hundreds of millions allegedly went to:
  - Terrorist organizations
  - Transnational criminal networks
  - Drug trafficking operations
  - Child trafficking rings

6. Ellison’s Defense

Ellison denies:
- Assisting the fraudsters.
- Taking actions to obstruct investigations.
- Doing anything improper regarding donations.
He dismisses Hawley’s characterizations as false and theatrical.

7. Scope of the Feeding Our Future Case

As of late last year (according to the text):
- 85 people charged
- 60 convictions
- Most individuals involved were of Somali descent (as stated in the text).

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Minnesota AG Crashes & Burns in Senate Testimony Covering up Fraud plus Dems Cause Largest Sewage Spill in History Feb 13, 2026

Show notes

1. Minnesota AG Keith Ellison’s Senate Testimony

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison was questioned in the Senate regarding alleged failures to prevent and address large‑scale fraud in the state’s Feeding Our Future program.
Senators—primarily Josh Hawley—accused Ellison of:
- Ignoring whistleblower warnings as early as 2018–2019.
- Meeting with individuals later indicted for fraud and allegedly offering to “look into” investigators who were scrutinizing them.
- Accepting approximately $10,000 in campaign donations from individuals tied to the fraud shortly after their meeting.
Ellison strongly denied wrongdoing, describing the claims as false and politically motivated.
The session was tense, marked by interruptions, raised voices, and confrontational exchanges.

2. Refusal to Condemn Louis Farrakhan

During questioning, Ellison declined to explicitly condemn antisemitic statements attributed to Louis Farrakhan.
He attempted to redirect discussion to immigration topics, expressing discomfort with the line of questioning.

3. Democrats Linked to Record Sewage Spill

Democratic officials in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia oversaw infrastructure failures leading to the largest sewage spill in U.S. history.
A burst 72‑inch sewer pipe released nearly one billion gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River.
Criticism is directed at:
- Lack of media coverage.
- Slow response times.
- Infrastructure mismanagement.
Emergency pumps had to be transported from Texas and Florida to address the crisis.

4. Discussion of Government Competence

Democratic‑run cities and states mismanage public systems (snow removal, wildfire mitigation, infrastructure maintenance, etc.).
They argue such patterns reflect systemic governmental incompetence.

5. Save America Act & Voter ID Debate

The Save America Act, passed in the House with near‑unanimous Republican support, requires:
- Proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote.
- Photo ID to vote.
Senator Ted Cruz advocates for aggressive procedural tactics in the Senate, including:
- Forcing a “talking filibuster.”
- Using the two‑speech rule to pressure Democratic senators.
The argument made: voter ID laws are widely supported across political and demographic groups.

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Now Playing: The Case of California's Disappearing Billions Feb 12, 2026

Show notes

1. Large-Scale Individual Fraud Example

A Los Angeles contractor, Alexander Suker, is accused of stealing $23 million intended to feed and house homeless individuals.
Funds were allegedly used for luxury homes, cars, vacations, designer goods, and private schools, instead of homeless services.

2. Failure to Deliver Promised Services

Suker was contracted to provide three meals per day to up to 600 homeless people.
Inspections reportedly found only canned beans and ramen noodles, contradicting billing claims.
Prosecutors allege the use of fake vendors, falsified facilities, and false service records.

3. Broader Pattern of Fraud in California

Federal authorities indicate at least 12 additional similar cases under investigation.
A U.S. Attorney stated that large sums were pushed out quickly with minimal vetting or checks and balances.

4. Comparison to Other State Scandals

Investigators and commentators compare California’s situation to Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud, claiming California’s fraud may be larger in scale.
Independent investigator Nick Shirley claims billions of dollars may be involved statewide.

5. Alleged Billions in Unaccounted Public Funds

$70 billion in taxpayer funds missing or unaccounted for
$24 billion spent on allegedly nonexistent homelessness programs
$18 billion on nonfunctional high-speed rail
$32 billion in stolen COVID relief funds
$2.5 billion lost to SNAP fraud

6. Political and Structural Implications

California leadership is accused of enabling fraud by prioritizing rapid spending over accountability.
Calls are made for whistleblower lawsuits as a tool to recover funds.
Critics argue that higher taxes are being proposed despite massive losses.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Trump Throws Down on Iran, Sanctuary Cities, Interest Rates & the Border in One Explosive Interview Feb 11, 2026

Show notes

1. Iran & Middle East Policy

Trump warns Iran to “not be foolish” and to accept a new nuclear/missile deal.
He signals possible deployment of a second U.S. aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East if negotiations fail.
References Operation Midnight Hammer, the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites six months earlier, framing it as a precedent for future action.
Iran insists negotiations be limited only to enrichment levels and rejects including missiles or regional proxy forces.
Netanyahu is meeting Trump at the White House, emphasizing U.S.–Israel alignment on Iran.

2. U.S. Border & Immigration

Trump says the U.S. currently has the strongest border in U.S. history, stating “essentially no illegal crossings in 8 months.”
Says maritime drug interdictions reduced drug flow by 33% and saved 25,000 American lives.
Argues his administration doesn’t receive enough credit due to “public relations problems.”

3. Sanctuary Cities

Trump calls sanctuary cities “sanctuaries for criminals,” claiming they protect killers, drug lords, and gang members.
Says Senator Lindsey Graham is pushing hard to eliminate sanctuary cities, and Trump backs him “100%.”
Points to New York City spending billions on migrants as evidence of the cost of sanctuary policies.

4. Minnesota Fraud Investigation

Trump alleges $19 billion in fraud in Minnesota related to medical programs and other aid.
Says Somali immigrants are responsible for significant fraud, including referencing a “fake congresswoman.”
States that recovering even 50% of nationwide fraud would “balance the budget without cuts.”

5. Federal Reserve & Interest Rates

Trump says appointing Jerome Powell was a mistake and was influenced by his Treasury Secretary.
Argues interest rates should be the lowest in the world, lower than Switzerland’s.
Says lowering rates by two points would eliminate the U.S. deficit “on paper.”

6. Trade Policy

Trump says past presidents, including Ronald Reagan, were “bad on trade” and allowed Japan and Germany to gain U.S. market share.
Says the U.S. had deficits with almost every country before he arrived.
Emphasizes he is “real good on trade,” contrasting himself with previous administrations.

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Detailed Prediction: Trump's Tariffs before the Supreme Court-What's Going to Happen Feb 11, 2026

Show notes

1. The Case at the Supreme Court

The case is Trump v. Vos Selections, argued on Nov. 5, 2025.
Small businesses are challenging Trump-era tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

2. Central Legal Questions

Does IEEPA’s power to “regulate imports” include authority to impose tariffs?
Did Congress delegate too much taxing authority to the President?
→ This triggers two major constitutional doctrines:
- Non‑Delegation Doctrine – Congress cannot hand over core lawmaking powers (like taxation) without clear limits.
- Major Questions Doctrine – Major economic or political actions require explicit congressional authorization.

3. Constitutional Tension

Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to:
- Lay and collect taxes/tariffs
- Regulate commerce with foreign nations
Tariffs sit at the intersection of foreign policy (executive power) and taxation (legislative power).

4. Oral Argument Themes

Justices skeptical of Trump’s argument:

Roberts – Concerned tariffs are fundamentally taxes on Americans, which is Congress’s domain.
Gorsuch & Barrett – Pressed the need for clear statutory limits; worried about unchecked executive authority.

Justices leaning toward upholding the tariffs:

Kavanaugh – Emphasized long history of broad presidential discretion in foreign affairs.
Thomas – Focused on historical practice of using tariffs as trade tools.
Alito – Concerned about practical impacts and the large reliance interests ($133B already collected).

5. Predicted Outcome (from the document’s speaker)

Expected ruling: 5–4 in favor of Trump, upholding tariff authority.
Predicted majority: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh + either Barrett or Gorsuch.
Reasoning:
- Court is reluctant to disrupt years of foreign policy and economic decisions already relying on the tariffs.
- Institutional stability concerns—similar to Roberts’ reasoning in the Affordable Care Act case.