TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Stanford Legal

    Law touches most aspects of life. Here to help make sense of it is the Stanford Legal podcast, where we look at the cases, questions, conflicts, and legal stories that
    affect us all every day.

    Pam Karlan studies and teaches a range of constitutional law-related courses with a special focus on what is known as the “law of democracy,”—the law that regulates voting, elections, and the political process. She served as a commissioner on the California Fair Political Practices Commission, an assistant counsel and cooperating attorney for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and (twice) as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. She also co-directs the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, which represents real clients before the highest court in the country, working on important cases including representing Edith Windsor in the landmark case striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act and Donald Zarda in a case where the Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBT individuals against discrimination in employment. She has argued before the Court ten times.

    And Rich Ford’s teaching and writing look at the relationship between law and equality, cities and urban development, popular culture and everyday life. He teaches local government law, employment discrimination, and the often-misunderstood critical race theory. He studied with and advised governments around the world on questions of equality law, lectured at places like the Sorbonne in Paris on the relationship of law and popular culture, served as a commissioner for the San Francisco Housing Commission, and worked with cities on how to manage neighborhood change and volatile real estate markets. He writes about law and popular culture for lawyers, academics, and popular audiences. His latest book is Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History, a legal history of the rules and laws that influence what we wear.

    Law matters. We hope you’ll listen to new episodes that will drop on Thursdays every two weeks.
    To learn more, go to https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-legal-podcast/.

    Advertise

    Copyright: © All rights reserved

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    High Court, High Stakes: The Massive Weight of Recent Supreme Court Rulings Aug 29, 2024
    Show notes

    In this episode, Professors Jeffrey Fisher and Easha Anand discuss recent Supreme Court rulings and the potential long-term impacts on American democracy and the rule of law.

    ---

    The Supreme Court's latest term was marked by decisions of enormous consequence. However, the way the Court has communicated about these rulings far undersells the gravity they carry.

    While “expressing itself in extremely modest terms,” Professor Jeffrey Fisher says, the current Supreme Court has “[handed] down decisions that have enormously consequential effects for our democracy, people's rights, and everything in between.” He and Assistant Professor Easha Anand, co-directors of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, agree that these recent decisions could reshape American law and politics for years to come.

    In this episode of Stanford Legal with host Pam Karlan, Fisher, and Anand take a critical look at recent Supreme Court rulings on abortion, gun rights, tech platforms, and the power of federal agencies, examining the Court's evolving approach and considering the potential long-term impacts on American democracy and the rule of law.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Jeff Fisher >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Easha Anand >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic >>> Stanford Law School Page

    (00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction to the Supreme Court Term and Key Cases

    Pam Karlan is joined by Professors Jeff Fisher and Easha Anand to discuss the past term at the Supreme Court, constitutional law and Supreme Court practice, highlighting key cases and themes from the term. They explore how the court's conservative majority shapes the docket and the role of Justices Barrett and Jackson in developing their judicial voices.

    (00:06:56) Chapter 2: High-Profile Cases: Guns, Abortion, and Administrative Law

    Examine major cases, including gun rights in Rahimi v. United States and Cargill v. Garland, abortion-related cases, and the pivotal Loper Bright decision affecting the administrative state. They analyze the court's reasoning and the broader implications of these rulings.

    (00:15:28) Chapter 3: The Court's Evolving Role and Methodology

    Discussion of the broader implications of the Supreme Court's evolving approach to its docket and decision-making processes, particularly in relation to the administrative state and the impact of recent rulings on future cases.

    (00:19:14) Chapter 4: The Supreme Court and Technology Cases

    They delve into the significant technology cases that were brought before the Supreme Court this term. They discuss how the Court addressed state laws from Florida and Texas aimed at restricting content moderation by big tech companies, marking the first time the First Amendment was applied to social media platforms. The discussion highlights the tension between traditional legal frameworks and the evolving digital landscape, with a focus on the implications of these rulings for the future of free speech online.

    (00:24:10) Chapter 5: Trump and the Supreme Court: Balancing Power and Immunity

    The group explores the complex legal landscape surrounding former President Donald Trump's involvement in Supreme Court cases. Easha Anand provides an in-depth analysis of the Trump v. United States case, where the Court examined the extent of presidential immunity concerning acts related to the 2020 election. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of the Court's rulings on Trump’s legal challenges, including how these decisions might shape future presidential conduct and accountability.

    (00:29:27) Chapter 6: Supreme Court’s Role in Protecting Democracy

    Pam Karlan and Jeff Fisher discuss the Supreme Court's role in safeguarding democratic processes. They analyze the Court's reluctance to engage deeply in political matters, such as the January 6th prosecution and political gerrymandering, highlighting the tension between judicial restraint and the need to protect democratic values. The chapter concludes with reflections on the broader implications of these decisions for the future of U.S. democracy, particularly in the context of voting rights and election integrity.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    How Lawyers Can Undermine Russian Sanctions and Ukraine War Effort Aug 15, 2024
    Show notes

    In this episode, lecturer Erik Jensen and Stanford Law and Policy Lab students Sarah Manny and Kyrylo Korol expose how attorney-client privilege can undermine the rule of law.

    ---

    The bedrock of the legal profession is a commitment to upholding the rule of law. Unfortunately, as Stanford Law researchers discover in the complex world of international sanctions, lawyers can often facilitate non-compliance and evasion.

    It’s been two years since Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. And yet, businesses are still skirting sanctions imposed on Russia. As Erik Jensen, director of the Rule of Law Program at Stanford Law School, and law students Sarah Manney and Kyrylo Korol explore in this episode of Stanford Legal, lawyers could be playing a critical role in enabling Russian Oligarchs’ evasive maneuvers.

    With hosts Rich Ford and Pam Karlan, the three guests explore the intricate relationship between legal practice and international sanctions, discussing insights from their research, the ethical responsibilities of lawyers, and potential solutions for safeguarding the rule of law.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Erik Jensen >>> Stanford Law School Page

    (00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview

    Kyrylo Korol discusses the responsibility of lawyers to uphold democracy and the impact of their actions on the profession. Hosts Rich Ford and Pam Karlan introduce the topic of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the international response.

    (00:01:33) Chapter 2: Genesis of the Policy Lab

    Erik Jensen explains the inception of the Policy Lab focusing on sanctions against Russia, including the motivation from an S-Term course and subsequent student enthusiasm.

    (00:03:16) Chapter 3: Kyrylo Korol's Personal Motivation

    Kyrylo Korol shares his dual perspective as a Ukrainian and American lawyer, emphasizing the need to keep the discussion on Russia's war against Ukraine alive and his personal drive to support Ukraine.

    (00:05:32) Chapter 4: Focus of the Policy Lab

    The team discusses the main areas of their research, including the role of Russian oligarchs in the war and the involvement of legal professionals in facilitating sanctions evasion.

    (00:12:57) Chapter 5: Comparative Analysis and Legal Frameworks

    The conversation shifts to the comparative study of how different countries regulate lawyers concerning sanctions and money laundering, and the ethical obligations of U.S. lawyers with Sarah Manney.

    (00:21:25) Chapter 6: Challenges and Implications for the Legal Profession

    The team delves into the implications of their findings for the legal profession, discussing the balance between upholding legal privileges and preventing abuse, and addressing systemic risks and de-risking issues.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    The Future of Environmental Regulation Following SCOTUS’ Overruling of the Chevron Doctrine Aug 01, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professor Debbie Sivas on recent Supreme Court decisions affecting environmental and administrative law.

    ---

    Do courts have the expertise to decide on important environmental law issues? Pam Karlan and Rich Ford speak with environmental law expert Debbie Sivas, director of the Environmental Law Clinic at Stanford, about recent Supreme Court decisions affecting environmental and administrative law--including the Court's decision to overturn decades of settled law by overturning Chevron. What are the implications of the Court's recent blockbuster environmental decisions--the impact on the Clean Air Act, and broader consequences for regulatory agencies and environmental policies. Tune in to explore how these legal shifts could reshape the landscape of environmental regulation in the United States.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Deborah Sivas >>> Stanford Law School Page

    (00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview

    Pam and Rich welcome Professor Debbie Sivas from Stanford's Environmental Law Clinic. They provide an overview of significant Supreme Court cases impacting environmental and administrative law, highlighting the pivotal Loeb or Wright decision that ended Chevron deference.

    (00:02:06) Chapter 2: Chevron Deference and Its Implications Explained

    Discussion on the historical context and implications of Chevron deference, with Debbie Sivas explaining its significance and how its removal might affect future legal interpretations and administrative agency power.

    (00:09:12) Chapter 3: Expert Opinions vs. Judicial Interpretations

    Examination of the Supreme Court's approach to statutory interpretation versus agency expertise, highlighting cases like Ohio against EPA and the challenges posed by the court's stance on scientific and technical matters.

    (00:16:12) Chapter 4: The Role of the Major Questions Doctrine and Non-Delegation Doctrine

    Analysis of the Major Questions Doctrine's impact on regulatory power and the potential resurgence of the Non-Delegation Doctrine, focusing on how these legal principles shape environmental policy and agency authority.

    (00:18:57) Chapter 5: The Ohio Against EPA Case and Its Broader Implications

    Detailed discussion on the Ohio against EPA case, its current status, and the implications of the Supreme Court's emergency stay decision on future regulatory actions and environmental protections.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    David Sklansky on Judge Cannon's Controversial Case Dismissal and Trump's Legal Battles Jul 18, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professor David Sklansky on Judge Cannon's decision and former president Donald Trump's legal battles.

    ---

    Will the three remaining cases against former president Donald Trump ever get to trial? After Judge Cannon's controversial dismissal of charges in the classified documents case—and the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision—the question is not so obvious. In this episode, criminal law expert David Sklansky joins Pam and Rich to discuss these two earthquake decisions, Special Prosecutor Jake Smith's appeal of Judge Cannon's decision, and the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • David Sklansky >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • David Sklansky’s Book >>> A Pattern of Violence: How the Law Classifies Crimes and What It Means for Justice

    (00:00:00) Introduction and Overview

    Introduction to the podcast, Professor David Sklansky, and overview of the topics: Judge Cannon's decision, special master appointment, and Supreme Court's recent decision on immunity.

    (00:01:43) Judge Cannon's Decision and Rationale

    Discussion on Judge Cannon's rationale for dismissing the classified documents case, the 11th Circuit's reversal, and the extraordinary nature of her decision.

    (00:04:12) Special Counsel Appointment and Historical Context

    Examination of the reasoning behind appointing a special counsel, Judge Cannon's strained statutory interpretations, and the long history of appointing special counsels.

    (00:07:23) Analysis of Previous Controversial Rulings

    Review of Judge Cannon's earlier controversial ruling about appointing a special master, the 11th Circuit's reversal, and consistency in historical interpretations.

    (00:13:42) Unitary Executive Theory and Accountability

    Discussion on the unitary executive theory, potential motivations behind Judge Cannon's rulings, and whether the case is about presidential accountability or diffusing responsibility.

    (00:21:05) Supreme Court's Immunity Decision and Future Implications

    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision to remand the election interference case, challenges and potential outcomes, and the impact on the Manhattan case involving official acts.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    Jennifer Chacón Discusses the Failures of U.S. Immigration Policy and How the Law is Developing Jul 04, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professor Jennifer Chacón on how immigration policy intersects with law.

    ---

    Control of the border and illegal immigration are again in the headlines and the centerpiece of a divisive presidential campaign. Here to help make sense of recent legal successes and failures is immigration law expert Jennifer Chacón, the Bruce Tyson Mitchell Professor of Law at Stanford. The author of the new book, Legal Phantoms: Executive Action and Haunting Failures of Immigration Law, which offers insights into the human stories and governmental challenges shaping contemporary immigration debates, Chacon discusses the complexities of immigration policy, its intersection with constitutional law, criminal law, and societal perceptions of identity and belonging.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Jennifer Chacón >>> Stanford Law School Page

    (00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction and Background

    Pam Karlan introduces the show and today’s guest, Jennifer Chacón, highlighting her research and recent book on immigration law, Legal Phantoms.

    ( 00:02:26) Chapter 2: The Stalemate of Immigration Reform

    Rich Ford addresses the lack of progress in comprehensive immigration reform. Jennifer Chacón details the initial aim of her research project to study the implementation of Senate Bill 744.The shift in focus to executive actions by President Obama after the bill’s failure, including the Deferred Action for Parents and DACA expansion programs.

    (00:07:05) Chapter 3: Understanding Deferred Action

    Jennifer Chacón explains deferred action and its implications for individuals lacking legal status, plus the significance of work authorization and the temporary nature of deferred action programs.

    (00:10:38) Chapter 4: Personal Stories and Community Impact

    Jennifer Chacón shares insights from her interviews with long-term residents about their perceptions of border policy and local enforcement and the varied perspectives of immigrants on the issues of border control and local government actions.

    (00:17:06) Chapter 5: Future of Immigration Reform

    Rich Ford inquires about potential reforms, and Jennifer Chacón emphasizes the interconnectedness of border policy and long-term resident solutions. They discuss the Biden administration’s recent announcements and their implications. Jennifer Chacón shares her view on the political challenges and ideal legislative changes for addressing immigration issues.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    Former Federal Judge Michael McConnell Discusses Presidential Immunity and Trump Cases with Pam Karlan Jun 20, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam for a discussion with Professor Michael McConnell on presidential immunity, the Constitution, and former president Trump's cases.

    ---

    Should presidents be immune from prosecution? If yes, under what circumstances? Stanford Professor Michael McConnell, a former federal judge, joins Pam Karlan for a discussion on presidential immunity, the Constitution, and former president Trump's cases. In this insightful episode, they discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's stance on criminal versus civil liabilities for presidents, the political ramifications of prosecutorial actions, and the historical context of executive power under the U.S. Constitution.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    Justice for All? Why We Have an Access to Justice Gap in America—And What to Do About It Jun 06, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professors Nora Freeman Engstrom and David Freeman Engstrom on access to justice for all.

    ---

    Is legal representation in the U.S. only for the rich and corporations? That's a question that we'll explore in this episode of Stanford Legal with guests David and Nora Freeman Engstrom, two leading authorities on access to justice and the legal profession. They'll explain the roots of the challenge, how unauthorized practice of law rules contribute to the problem, and how to address them. The Engstroms co-direct Stanford Law School's Deborah L. Rhode Center on the Legal Profession, an academic center working to shape the future of legal services and access to the legal system. This episode delves into some alarming statistics, including the fact that in three-quarters of civil cases in state courts, at least one party is without a lawyer. This alone often leads to unjust outcomes in cases involving debt collection, evictions, family law, and other areas. And that is just part of the problem, as the Engstroms explain.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Nora Freeman Engstrom >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • David Freeman Engstrom >>> Stanford Law School Page

    Chapter 1: The Access to Justice Crisis in the U.S.
    (00:00:00) Pam Karlan introduces the episode, discussing the work of David and Nora Freeman Engstrom at Stanford Law School's Deborah Rhode Center on the Legal Profession. This section provides an overview of the access to justice crisis, highlighting the high percentage of cases where individuals lack legal representation and a look at the types of cases predominantly at issue, including debt collection, evictions, mortgage foreclosures, and family law cases.

    Chapter 2: Understanding the Consequences and Causes of Legal Inaccessibility
    (00:7:06) David and Nora Freeman Engstrom explore the broader implications of the lack of legal representation, including the cascade of related legal and financial issues that arise from initial problems like wage garnishment and eviction. They also touch on the hidden legal issues that never make it to court due to individuals' inability to seek legal help.

    Chapter 3: Exploring Solutions and Technological Impacts on Access to Justice
    (00:10:07) David and Nora Freeman Engstrom delve into potential solutions to the access to justice crisis, including the role of technology in both exacerbating and potentially alleviating the problem. They discuss the efficiency of technological tools used by the debt collection industry and the implications for legal access.

    Chapter 4: The Technology Asymmetry in Debt Collection
    (00:14:19 ) Pam Karlan and David Freeman Engstrom discuss how debt collectors use automation to exploit legal processes against unrepresented individuals. They highlight the stark disparity between technological access for debt collectors and individual defendants. Engstrom points out the restrictive rules that limit software-driven legal services, exacerbating the access to justice crisis.

    Chapter 5: The Historical Context and Current Restrictions on Legal Services
    (00:15:55) Nora Freeman Engstrom delves into the history of legal service restrictions in the U.S., contrasting it with medical professions. She introduces her research on auto clubs and their provision of legal services in the early 20th century, showing how organized bar associations shut down these alternatives to preserve their monopoly.

    Chapter 6: Modern Innovations and Future Prospects in Legal Services
    (00:24:13) The host and guests discuss recent efforts to relax unauthorized practice of law rules in states like Utah and Arizona. They explore innovative legal service models emerging from these reforms, including tiered services and AI-driven solutions, and their potential to democratize access to legal assistance. The discussion highlights how entities like LegalZoom are now able to hire lawyers and provide more comprehensive services. They also touch on the potential of generative AI to bridge the gap between legal jargon and plain language, making legal assistance more accessible to the public. The chapter concludes with reflections on the promise and challenges of these technological advancements.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    The Legacy of Brown v. BOE: Success or Failure? May 23, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professor Rick Banks about the successes and failures of Brown v. Board of Education.

    ---

    In this episode, Rich and Pam discuss the successes and failures of Brown v. Board of Education with their colleague, Rick Banks. Marking the 70th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision, they look at its impact on Jim Crow segregation and the ongoing challenges in achieving educational equality in the U.S. Banks offers a critical analysis of the effectiveness of Brown in integrating American primary and secondary education and explores alternative approaches to further racial and socioeconomic integration in schools.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Ralph Richard Banks >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Lawyer online feature >>> Brown v. Board: Success or Failure?

    (00:00:00) Chapter 1: Introduction and Significance of Brown vs. Board of Education
    Introduction to the podcast and the topic of Brown vs. Board of Education. Discussion on the transformative impact of Brown on American society and its less effective impact on primary and secondary education.

    (00:02:36) Chapter 2: Initial Impact and Challenges of Brown
    Exploration of the immediate aftermath of the Brown decision, including the decade of minimal desegregation and the eventual legislative push in the 1960s. Mention of personal anecdotes highlighting the slow progress.

    (00:06:35) Chapter 3: Massive Resistance and Supreme Court’s Role
    Discussion on the era of massive resistance to desegregation, the role of the Southern Manifesto, and the Supreme Court's strategic avoidance of direct intervention. Examination of the lingering effects of this period on the present educational landscape.

    (00:10:16) Chapter 4: Socioeconomic Disparities and School Segregation
    Analysis of the ongoing economic inequality and its impact on school segregation. Comparison between Northern and Southern school desegregation efforts, with specific examples from Detroit and Charlotte.

    (00:14:45) Chapter 5: Legal and Structural Barriers to Integration
    Examination of legal decisions such as Milliken and San Antonio vs. Rodriguez that reinforced segregation and funding disparities. Discussion on the narrow scope of Brown and its consequences.

    (00:18:58) Chapter 6: Integration vs. Educational Quality
    Debate on the merits of integration versus focusing on educational quality through alternative methods such as charter schools and vouchers. Consideration of the mixed outcomes of these approaches.

    (00:22:19) Chapter 7: Parental Responsibility and Systemic Solutions
    Reflection on the burden placed on parents to seek better education through choice programs. Comparison to historical figures who fought for desegregation. Discussion on the need for systemic solutions rather than relying solely on choice.

    (00:25:02) Chapter 8: Future Directions and Pragmatic Solutions
    Call for a mix of approaches to improve education, combining integration efforts with initiatives focused on educational quality. Emphasis on the importance of experimentation, evidence collection, and open-minded evaluation of educational policies.


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    Stanford's David Sklansky on Trump's Many Trials May 09, 2024
    Show notes

    Join Pam and Rich for a discussion with Professor David Sklansky the many trials of former president Trump.

    ---

    Criminal law expert and former federal prosecutor David Sklansky joins Pam and Rich to discuss the New York trial and other cases against former president Trump. From state prosecutions to federal cases, they analyze the defense and prosecution strategies and implications of each trial, shedding light on the legal challenges facing Trump, the first current or former president in U.S. history to face criminal charges.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • David Sklansky >>> Stanford Law School Page

    [00:00:00] Chapter 1: Progress and Impact of the New York Trial

    • Discussion of Donald Trump’s ongoing trial in New York related to hush money payments.
    • Focus on the efficiency of jury selection and trial progress.
    • Analysis of the impact of trial pace on prosecution's case.
    • The role of trial speed in influencing juror perceptions.

    [00:04:48] Chapter 2: Trump's Response and Gag Order

    • Trump's response to the trial and constraints of the gag order.
    • Effectiveness of the gag order in curbing Trump's behavior.
    • Discussion on Trump's criminal contempt and its implications.
    • Analysis of potential consequences and judicial response.

    [00:08:58] Chapter 3: Case Strength/Strategy and Jury Perception

    • Evaluation of the strength of the case and potential challenges.
    • Impact of jury perception on the trial outcome.
    • Insight into trial strategy regarding witness sequencing.
    • Discussion on the prosecution's approach to witness testimony.

    [00:19:45] Chapter 4: Supreme Court's Role and Case Complexity

    • Discussion on the Supreme Court's involvement in pending cases.
    • Analysis of case complexity and its impact on trial timelines.

    [00:22:56] Chapter 5: Challenges in the Mar-a-Lago Case

    • Examination of challenges and delays in the Mar-a-Lago case.
    • Analysis of trial judge's management and potential trial outcomes.

    [00:25:49] Chapter 6: Potential Trial Outcomes and Implications

    • Discussion on potential trial outcomes and their implications.
    • Overview of civil cases against Trump and their significance.

    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    AI in Government and Governing AI: A Discussion with Stanford’s RegLab Apr 25, 2024
    Show notes

    Joining Pam and Rich for this discussion are Professor Daniel Ho and RegLab Fellow Christie Lawrence, JD ’24 (MPP, Harvard Kennedy School of Government).

    Dan is the founding director of Stanford’s RegLab (Regulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab), which builds high-impact partnerships for data science and responsible AI in the public sector. The RegLab has an extensive track record partnering with government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Labor, and Santa Clara County on prototyping and evaluating AI tools to make government more fair, efficient, and transparent. Building on this work, the RegLab also helps agencies strengthen AI governance and operationalize trustworthy AI principles.

    Christie, a third-year JD student, worked with RegLab and Stanford’s Innovation Clinic on projects to advise DOL on responsible AI and development practices and to support the work with Prof. Ho on the National AI Advisory Committee, which advises the White House on AI policy. In this interview, we’ll learn about several RegLab projects—and the importance of helping government develop smart AI policy and solutions.

    Connect:

    • Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website
    • Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page
    • Rich Ford >>> Twitter/X
    • Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page
    • Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X
    • Stanford Law Magazine >>> Twitter/X

    Links:

    • Dan Ho >>> Stanford Law School web page

    [00:00:00] Chapter 1: Setting the Stage

    • Mention of the rapid acceleration of technology and the release of ChatGPT.
    • Highlighting the risks associated with AI, such as bias and privacy concerns.
    • Discussion on the relationship between AI and governance, including recent developments in AI policy and governance.
    • Mention of the Biden administration's executive order on AI and its implications.

    [00:03:04] Chapter 2: The Role of Reg Lab and Collaboration with the IRS

    • Explanation of the Reg Lab and its purpose.
    • Discussion on the need for government agencies to modernize their technology infrastructure.
    • Overview of the collaboration with the IRS to improve tax evasion detection using machine learning.
    • Discovery of disparities in auditing rates and subsequent IRS reforms.
    • Highlighting the intersection of AI, social justice, and government practices.

    [00:09:12] Chapter 3: Student Perspective

    • Christie Lawrence shares her experience working on AI policy at Stanford Law School.
    • Discussion on bridging the gap between policy, law, and technology.
    • Impactful work done by students in collaboration with government agencies.

    [00:11:38] Chapter 4: AI and Social Justice

    • Pam Karlan's experience with AI issues in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
    • Examples of algorithmic discrimination and its implications for social justice.
    • Discussion on the challenges of addressing AI-related issues in government practices.

    [00:23:55] Chapter 5: Future Directions

    • Optimism about the future of AI governance and the recent executive order's impact.
    • Anticipation of legislative proposals and state-level initiatives in AI regulation.
    • Importance of maintaining an open innovation ecosystem and addressing talent gaps in government agencies.

    [00:25:55] Chapter 6: Audience Questions


    Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.


    Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 22 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights