TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    PhD Transition Report On-Demand

    Podcast by Cheeky Scientist

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Leverage Scientific Communication Skills (Or, Nerd-Speak) To Get Hired Apr 19, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to: 3:45 Show Me The Data23:05 Cara Santa Maria47:25 Robyn Marty-Roix, Ph.D. Do you enjoy talking or writing about science more than actually doing it? Learn how you can leverage your PhD to pursue a science or medical communications career. In this episode, we are joined by the award winning journalist, science communicator, television personality, author, and podcast host Cara Santa Maria! She is a correspondent for National Geographic, hosts a weekly Podcast Talk Nerdy, and was previously a correspondent on the Netflix hit Bill Nye Saves The World. We are also joined by Robyn Marty-Roix, PhD a Principal Medical Writer for Boston Scientific. She will share her experience transitioning from academic to industry, discuss what medical writing is and explain how you can pursue a career in medical writing. It’s our privilege to hear from Cara and Robyn and to learn about how you can leverage your science background to succeed in science communication. About Our Guests Cara Santa Maria is a Los Angeles Area Emmy and Knight Foundation Award winning journalist, science communicator, television personality, author, and podcaster. Cara is a correspondent on National Geographic’s flagship television series Explorer. She is the creator and host of a weekly science podcast called Talk Nerdy with Cara Santa Maria, co-hosts the popular Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe podcast, and hosts the new podcast Fixed That for You. She co-authored the Skeptics Guide to the Universe book with her podcast co-hosts and is the spokesperson for National Geographic’s Almanac 2019. She is a founding member of the Nerd Brigade and cofounded the annual science communication retreat #SciCommCamp. Previously, Cara was a correspondent on Netflix’s Bill Nye Saves the World, TechKnow on Al Jazeera America, and Real Future on Fusion. She earned her B.S. in Psychology from the University of North Texas, followed by an M.S. in Neurobiology. She is currently working toward a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology with a concentration in Social Justice and Diversity from Fielding Graduate University. Robyn Marty-Roix earned her PhD from the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Biomedical Science, focusing on immunology and virology. She started her industry career as a Scientist II with Boston Scientific and currently works at Boston Scientific as a Principal Medical Writer. Throughout her career Robyn has used the knowledge she gained in one field to learn and succeed in a new field. She has 14+ years of preclinical research, leadership and project management experience in multiple disciplines. She is driven by a desire to lead and learn, regularly volunteering with professional development organizations. Most recently, she has joined the board of the Association for Women In Science as the Events Director and helped to establish the Central Massachusetts Chapter to bring educational and professional development events to Central Massachusetts. Key Takeaways 1. PhDs can bring a high level of credibility to science communication. It also allows you to leverage your science background and your communication skills. 2. Science communication comes in many forms, writing, podcasting television, outreach. It’s just about finding the one that’s right for you and then leaning into what makes you unique. 3. If you are struggling with depression, it’s okay to see someone and find out what all your options are. It doesn’t mean you are weak or that you are a failure. It means you are human. 4. Always follow up after an interview even if you don’t get the position. Don’t waste the connections you just made with people at that company. Why PhDs Make Great Science Communicators The role of science communication in all its forms is growing. The University of Nottingham found that the number of publications about science journalism, public engagement with science and dissemination of science via media have increased dramatically over the pas decade. Specifically the number of papers about science debates and the role of journalism increased from less 20 published per year to more than 300 published per year. It’s becoming more important for science to be communicated to a wide variety of audiences and PhDs bring a high level of credibility to science communication. While the public tends to mistrust the media, they actually have a relatively high trust in scientists According to the Pew Research Center, only 13% of the public said they had confidence in the press but 44% of the public said they have confidence in scientists. You position as an expert scientist makes you an excellent candidate for science communication. Leverage Scientific Communication Skills (Or, Nerd-Speak) To Get Hired: A Conversation With Cara Santa Maria Isaiah: Can you unpack what science communication is and what you actually do on a day to day basis? Cara So it’s being this bridge between the academic kind of scientific establishment and people who are reading science news people who are watching television people who are listening to podcasts. So I have a lot of friends that are science writers that are incredibly talented science writers. I don’t do that much science writing mostly because I hate writing. It’s not it does not come easy for me. So it takes me probably 10 times the amount of time to write the same number of words and I’m frustrated the entire time. But my platform historically has mostly been television. So I do three different podcasts as I mentioned and I do love podcasting. I think it’s a great it’s a great platform for being able to communicate science. But there is something very special about television because you have that multimedia component and you can tell stories in a way that are really visually compelling. Isaiah: I want to frame it as like a career path. How do you actually make money off this? I really want to I want to share that trajectory but I want to start at the point where you made that transition from something you just like to do to getting paid for it. Cara: Yeah. And it doesn’t happen overnight. And I think that’s something that’s important for people to realize. I do highly recommend if you’re going to start science communication and you really do have an interest in making this your principal moneymaker that you have something happening in parallel. You should have either a backup plan, be actively working on your degree right or have a day job because it is very, very difficult to immediately start making money doing this. I mean part of it is just the name of the game when you’re a freelancer right. That we hear terms like net 30, net 60, net 90. What that really means is that when you send that invoice to whoever has hired you for something they have 30, 60, or 90 days to pay you back. So I mean think about a two week window in your job right now or maybe a month window. It can be really difficult. So oftentimes as a freelancer you’re juggling a lot of open invoices and sometimes you have to chase people up, which is kind of frustrating. You know early on when I was doing television, I was brought on as an expert guest for a lot of things. When you’re an expert guest, let’s say you’re on a panel on a news show or you’re coming on to explain some sort of big finding on your local television station, you’re usually not paid for that. Usually it’s not until you’re actually doing hosting work that you start to get paid in television. So I wasn’t making money when I first started doing on air work. Same with the podcast. You know a lot of people will start a podcast and until you actually have decent listenership you’re probably not going to be able to monetize your podcast. Now I’m in a place where my podcasts are monetized. You know I sell ads in every podcast episode. I have a patron for Talk Nerdy Talk Nerdy. It’s my show. So I produce it and I get an income from that. Isaiah: I want to go back and talk more about the struggle of leaving academia, because we have a lot of people who are listening who are in you know what we call those kind of darkest hour moment. What was your darkest hour when you know that moment when you realized the pain got bad enough that you realized you had to make a change what did that look like what brought that on? Cara: The funny thing is my darkest hour came I think after my darkest hour because my real darkest hour was after I made the change but wasn’t sure if it was the right decision. So I had my darkest hour in New York first which again it was a transition from Texas to New York which was tough for me. It’s funny because people always think I’m a New Yorker like I’ve got a New York vibe but the truth is I like it when people friendly and not in a hurry. I’m not saying New Yorkers aren’t friendly, they’re real friendly but culturally there is a vibe that there’s too many people and you just don’t have time for courtesy with every single person you meet. So that was a big shift for me coming from the south. Also during that time along with the inner interpersonal stuff I was really broke. That was really hard for me, New York’s a hard city to live in when you have no money. I was living in Queens not really in Manhattan proper. So I felt like I was sort of on the outskirts because I was at Queens College at the time and more and more than anything it was like really mental health issues. So I’ve always had clinical depression. I’ve always been very open about that and I’ve always advocated for reducing stigma around mental health concerns. But when I was in New York I didn’t yet have a psychologist. I was not yet on a medication regimen. I was in a place where I was really feeling like, “Oh I’m not sick so I don’t need to take meds and if I need to take meds that means I really can’t handle myself.” I think it’s a common kind of self talk that a lot of us in academia have where we’re experiencing classic symptoms of mental illness yet we feel like, you know we have a lot of self efficacy. We have a strong internal focus of control so we can just kind of get through it. And it took many years before I realized that I needed a change. So you know at first it was hard, I decided let’s go to L.A. and see what happens. It’s like a door opened and I walked through it. And then after a couple of years in L.A. I wasn’t sure if I made the right choice. It was tough. I had a couple of great opportunities very quickly and then all of a sudden they died down. I wasn’t making good money. I was struggling a little bit. I found a good therapist and at my darkest point I was like maybe I need to take medication and I started to see a psychiatrist. I started taking an antidepressant which I still take to this day everyday. And you know I had this epiphany that a lot of people have when they’re struggling with mental illness and then they finally do decide to seek all of their options and see what’s right for them. A lot of people when they first start taking medication are like why did I wait so long I could have felt like this years ago I could have experienced a new normal for me that is much more functional. And I had that epiphany. Not everybody has it. For some people medication doesn’t work for some people it’s not right for them. But I mean the one thing that I would say to anybody who is watching this right now who’s struggling with depression and anxiety feeling incredibly overwhelmed and realizing that it’s seeping into their academic life their vocational life their interpersonal life their relationships, they’re not sleeping. You need to see somebody and see what your options are. It doesn’t mean you’re weak. It doesn’t mean that you failed. It means that you’re a human being. You’re a human being who has who is doing superhuman things right now and you might need a little bit of help. So that for me was a big change. I think getting my mental health in check establishing a functional work life balance. That’s when things really started to pick up because I was I don’t know I was awake I was capable and I was able to balance things a little bit better than I had previously. Principal Medical Writer Career Track: A Conversation With Robyn Marty-Roix, Ph.D. Isaiah: You taking advantage of networking was important for your transition. What did that look like practically? Robyn: For me I mean I was going to a lot of events, but they weren’t really suiting my needs. So I really tapped into my more close personal network. I happened to be really close friends with somebody who had a high position at the company where I am now. I mean she didn’t give me the job but she got me a face to face first interview here at the company, which was for a full time job as a medical writer. I actually did really well through the interview process and everything but they end up going with somebody with more experience. But I tapped into that hiring manager who turned me down and she actually helped propel me into some other things here. Isaiah: You brought up that you talked to the hiring manager after you didn’t get the position. How did that go? Robyn: I was probably like everybody else I was really nervous to do it. But I had contacted during the interview process, so I felt comfortable reaching out. She just said they ended up going in another direction with somebody who had more experience. And so I said I really appreciated her input. That was great. I mean she complimented me on my writing tests which I’d never done one before. So I was like oh she’s being serious but I told her you know I acknowledge that I’m sure it was a really hard decision and that if something were to come along later or please keep me in mind. It was just that standard sort of language but it was just really appreciating that the time and effort she took to respond to me as well as just interviewing me. ** to hear the full interviews watch the full episode in the video above. To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now. The post Leverage Scientific Communication Skills (Or, Nerd-Speak) To Get Hired appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    What PhDs Need To Know About Leadership & How To Become A Career Multiplier Mar 29, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to: 05:40 – Show Me the Data23:35 – What PhDs Need To Know About Leadership w/ Liz Wiseman44:20 – Importance Of Continued Technical Training w/ Tim Bushnell, Ph.D.56:20 – Project Manager Career Track w/ Orly Levitan, Ph.D. Do want to move beyond entry level positions? Ready to learn more about how you can develop your leadership skills? In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio we are very excited to be joined by Liz Wiseman, renowned Researcher, Executive Advisor, CEO and Author. As a PhD you are qualified for management-level positions in industry but to thrive in those positions you need to become a true leader, in this episode we learn from one of the top leadership experts in the world, Liz Wiseman! Plus we discuss the importance of continued education to your career with Tim Bushnell, Ph.D. and we learn about what it’s like to work as a Project Manager from Orly Levitan, Ph.D. About Our Guests Liz Wiseman is a researcher and executive advisor who teaches leadership to executives around the world. She is the author of New York Times bestseller Multipliers: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter, The Multiplier Effect: Tapping the Genius Inside Our Schools, and Wall Street Journal bestseller Rookie Smarts: Why Learning Beats Knowing in the New Game of Work. She is the CEO of the Wiseman Group, a leadership research and development firm headquartered in Silicon Valley, California. Some of her recent clients include: Apple, AT&T, Disney, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Nike, Salesforce, Tesla, and Twitter. Liz has been listed on the Thinkers50 ranking and named one of the top 10 leadership thinkers in the world. She has conducted significant research in the field of leadership and collective intelligence and writes for Harvard Business Review, Fortune, and a variety of other business and leadership journals. A former executive at Oracle Corporation, she worked over the course of 17 years as the Vice President of Oracle University and as the global leader for Human Resource Development. She is a frequent guest lecturer at BYU and Stanford University. Liz holds a Bachelors degree in Business Management and a Masters of Organizational Behavior from Brigham Young University. Tim Bushnell, Ph.D. is the Director of the University of Rochester Medical Center Shared Resource Lab and co-founder of Expert Cytometry. Here’s a bit about him in his own words: I enjoy answering paradigm-shifting questions and trouble-shooting puzzling glitches. I also like finding new ways to enhance old procedures. I’m passionate about my professional relationships and strive to fill them with positive energy. My other passions include grilling, wine tasting, and real food. My biggest passion is flow cytometry and my personal mission is to make flow cytometry education accessible, relevant, and fun. I’ve had a long history in the field starting all the way back in graduate school. Orly Levitan Ph.D. earned her PhD at Bar-llan Univeristy and is currently the Senior Project Manager at HYGIEACARE Inc where she is Responsible for the HyGIbiome® business and research program, aimed towards maximizing the value of the HyGIeaCare products and services on the gut and overall health of our patients. Her role at HYGIEACARE involves initiating, forming and maintaining collaborations, both with the private sector and with the scientific-academic world and she is in charge of communicating the company’s products and science to our different stakeholders. Key Takeaways 1. According to a survey of employers, there is a lack of quality leaders in industry at all levels. 2. Good leaders are ‘Multipliers’ meaning that they bring out the best in the people around them. They allow others to fully share and develop their own genius, which then benefits the entire organization. 3. Even in a technical R&D role employers are considering the way you will fit into the company culture and the team very highly. They want to hire someone who they want to work with, someone with good soft skills. Why Industry Needs PhDs Like You To Step Up And Lead First, it’s imperative that you realize the importance of all your so called soft skills. They are actually more important than your technical skills. A recent survey by Yoh, found that 75% of Americans say they would prefer to hire a candidate who has the right transferable skills, even if they are missing the required technical skills or if you don’t have the required experience. This is great news for you as a PhDs because it means you don’t need that industry experience if you just develop your transferable skills and learn how to communicate your transferable skills effectively. But this also means that if you don’t develop your transferable skills, if you don’t communicate those on your resume, your LinkedIn profile, during the interview process, it is very, very unlikely that you will get hired. Not fully understanding how to communicate transferable skills is the number one reason that we see PhDs really struggling in their job search. And one of the most sought after transferable skills is leadership. The Brandon Hall Group, found that 84% of organizations anticipate a shortfall of leaders in the next five years. That means the vast majority of organizations are on the lookout for new leaders. The study also found that 58% of organization’s top priority is closing leadership skill gaps, at all levels. SO whether you are getting into your first industry position or you are looking for a promotion, organizations are searching for people who can help fill the leadership gaps at their company. Demonstrate to them that you are the leader they need. What PhDs Need To Know About Leadership & How To Become A Career Multiplier: A Conversation With Liz Wiseman Isaiah: The first question that I have is, can you help us understand what you would define as a leader? Liz: Well, I’ll share with you my favorite definition and it came from Jim Collins who wrote Good to Great and a number of other great books. I heard him describe it as a leader is someone that people follow when they don’t have to. I just can’t think of a better definition. Of course a leader is someone that people follow. But a lot of us are pretending to follow people because we have to and I think a true leader is someone that you follow willingly of your own volition. You would follow them whether you report to them, whether you work for their company or not. They tend to bring out people’s best and engender people’s best thinking and also all of their discretionary effort. Isaiah: before we talk about what a multiplier is, what made you write this book? Why did you write it? Liz: Well, it was combination of an observation, a question and a pressing need. I really wrote it because nobody else had written it. So the observation came out of my years in the corporate world and I noticed I got thrown into management really early in my career and because of that I watched really carefully what the people who seemed to know what they were doing we’re doing and what I noticed is that despite the fact that I was working around a lot of really, really smart people and working on an executive team of brilliant people, not all of those brilliant people caused brilliance around them. I would watch absolutely brilliant executives walk in a room and I would see, it was like you could witness the collective IQ of the room drop. Like people would cower around these leaders or they were just hold back because maybe that person was so smart and capable, everyone deferred to them and I ended up calling these leaders diminishers because they were smart, but they ended up diminishing the intelligence and capability of the people around them. But I watched other leaders who were equally brilliant come into a room and I watched people step up and speak up and be at their best, and it was just an observation like, wow, why are we so smart around some people but not around others? Why is it that the leader seems to have an effect on essentially effective intelligence? I was just curious about this. I left the corporate world. I began doing some executive coaching and did a lot of coaching. It was actually in coaching someone that I was explaining this dynamic and he’s like, “Oh, that’s interesting. So what you’re saying is some leaders are like amplifiers of intelligence,” and that’s where this name multipliers came from. I went out looking for research on this. I was sure somebody else had stated it. It was such an obvious dynamic, but nobody had. There was nothing even remotely close to a study around this and so that was the pressing need. Honestly, I was looking for an article to give my coaching client and there was none. So I figured, well, someone’s got to do this. Isaiah: So what were the findings? What were these, as you started to look at these amplifiers who turned into the multipliers, what were the qualities of these multipliers and how are they different from the diminishers? Liz: Well, I’ll tell you that the not so surprising finding is that these leaders operate in very different ways and may come from a very different mindset. That’s not the surprising part. I can tell you more about that. But here’s what’s surprising is I found that these diminishing leaders get less than half of people’s available intelligence. By that I mean, their knowledge, their skills, their insights, both their technical skills as well as their creativity, half, less than half. Of course, the organization is paying full price. So like a school principal, a school board hires all these teachers, but if they have a diminishing principal on staff, they’re yielding about 50% of the value of what they’ve just invested in and that happens all over the world. The second thing that was surprising is that, well, so few of these diminishers understood the diminishing impact they were having. But the truly surprising finding was that most of the diminishing that’s happening is not coming from these tyrannical, narcissistic bully like diminishers, that most of it is coming from really well intended people, the people who are trying to close that leadership gap, people who want to be good bosses, good managers and I find that most of the diminishing is coming from what I call the accidental diminisher… watch the video above to hear the who interview. Importance Of Continued Technical Training: A Conversation With Tim Bushnell, Ph.D. Isaiah: You’ve worked with the biggest companies in industry, Regeneron, MedImmune, Pfizer, SickKids, etc why are these companies putting such value in ongoing technical training now for their staff? Why is it so important for a PhD who gets into industry to continue their technical training as well, if they want to advance in their careers? Tim Bushnell: Well, I think we have to go back to the whole reproducibility crisis in science. I like to point out both the Bayer study and the Begley Analysis paper. Bayer said only 25% of the work they tried to reproduce was reproducible. And Begley was at Amgen and it was only like 11% of the studies that they could reproduce. So that really shows that poor science can’t get transferred into biotech industry and lead to downstream treatments and improvement in the products. So having a continuing skillset in flow cytometry is very big in a lot of these areas, oncology, immunology, things of that nature. Knowing the best practices is critical. And if you learned your practices 25 years ago, and you haven’t changed, what you’re doing now is bad science. And that’s going to lead to poor reproducible results. So what you need to do is keep up to date as what’s going on. I mean, even for a mature science like flow cytometry, we’re still seeing developments. The CyTOF mass cytometer five years ago, spectral analyzers, smaller, faster, portable machines, larger numbers of fluorochromes. You can ask more questions, but you have to be careful that you know how to do that properly. You can’t go from running a four or five fluorescent panel to running an 80 color panel in a week, although people try. Isaiah: What do you see being the benefit of these technical training courses? Tim: Well, so in flow cytometry, we have a certification exam. To keep that current, you need to have continuing education credit. And one of the ways to get it is by taking the videos from Expert Cytometry, and watching those, and participating in that program. So you can get one CE per video, effectively. And that’s a lot cheaper than trying to send your technical staff to meetings and conferences where you can get CE credit. You’re talking about thousands of dollars just to register for some of these classes. In addition to that, you’re making sure that your team members and your senior people who are taking the material too, have the understanding of the best practices. Why should we be doing this, or why should we be doing that? When I was just out of biotech, and we were talking about the whole issue of isotype controls, which is a huge issue. If you read the Excyte blogs, and read some of the other material we’ve written, doing isotype controls is not the best practice. So they’re wasting money, they’re wasting time, they’re wasting energy. So knowing the best practices helps you also save money. And having a team that’s got the skill set means that you’re going to do the process right the first time. You’re not going to have to reinvent the wheel a hundred times and lose that momentum. Project Manager Career Track: A Conversation With Orly Levitan, Ph.D. Isaiah: I know this is the reason that you got hired, because you’re able to do this. So help us get inside the mind of Orly. How do you pull off this magic trick of getting people to do stuff when you don’t have any authority over them? Orly: I work really hard. I believe in what I do. I try to reflect it. I work for the best … for what I believe that is the best for the company. And I believe that the people that work with me want the same. I try really, within interactions, to minimize my ego. It’s not easy after I’ve been a professor in academia. But it’s really like, it’s about the product. It’s about the project. It’s about the company. And I try to be as polite as I can, and to be very elaborative, to be very transparent, to explain why I need those things to get done. So far it has been working. Isaiah: Can you break your project manager role down even more to almost on a day to day, or week to week basis? How much of it’s meetings, following up with people, checking on timelines, projects, juggling, what does the role look like? Orly: It’s everything. And that’s what I love about it. So there are days that I have back to back meetings in … I actually work around the clock, so I live in the Northeast, and I work … there are days that I start very early with Israel, and then follow up meetings with Germany, and then have some kind of a break, and then I work with California. And I love it. It’s really nice. So like some days are meetings, some days where I detach, and I do a lot of research. Some days I write, some days are for data analysis. As I said, it’s a small company, so I get to do a lot of that. And there is the 30 minutes a day where I have the list of emails, people to follow, to see was the money wired here with this, did this happen, do I need to reply to that? So you kinda need to form a system. And it’s really nice. To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now. The post What PhDs Need To Know About Leadership & How To Become A Career Multiplier appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Day In The Life Of A PhD Level Industry R&D Professional Mar 15, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to:

    00:12 – Show Me the Data
    15:10 – Principal Scientist Track w/ Lilian Josephson, Ph.D.
    30:25 – Associate Research Scientist Track w/ Evan Dubiel, Ph.D.
    41:15 – Scientist I Track w/ Natalie Fredette, Ph.D.

    Are you interested in pursuing a career in R&D?

    Want to know what it’s like to actually work in industry R&D as a PhD?

    In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, we are joined by 3 PhDs who have successfully transitioned into an industry R&D position. Each of the PhDs joining us has industry experience and want to share their insights and perspective with you. Just like you they sought out something different than academia and found success in industry. Our 3 guests, Lilian Josephson, Ph.D., Evan Dubiel, Ph.D., and Natalie Fredette, Ph.D. share incredibly valuable insight into how they found success in industry R&D.

    About Our Guests

    Lilian Josephson, Ph.D. completed her Ph.D. at the University of Delaware and she currently works as a Principal Chemist at Ecolab. She has 5+ years’ experience working closely with biotech/CMC industry scientists from Genentech, Abbott, and Momentive. Currently she helps make the world cleaner, safer, and healthier by inventing and developing hand care products that are designed for them. She helps clean 40 billion hands each year!

    Evan Dubiel, Ph.D. completed his Ph.D. at the Université de Sherbrooke in Chemical and Biotechnological Engineering and he currently works as an Associate Research Scientist at PPD developing pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assays with multipleimmunological platforms including ELISA and Mesoscale Discovery.

    Natalie Fredette Ph.D. completed her Ph.D. in Biomedical Science at the University of New Mexico. She currently works as a Scientist I at BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. At BioMarin she is a part of the Translational Biology team, working to turn creative ideas into cutting edge solutions for patients with rare disease.

    Key Takeaways

    1. The priorities of industry R&D are very different than academic research. In industry the major end goal is to create a product while in academia the end goal is to get a publication.

    2. You do not need a postdoc to get hired in industry R&D. In fact, too long of a postdoc will hurt your chance of getting hired.

    3. Even in a technical R&D role employers are considering the way you will fit into the company culture and the team very highly. They want to hire someone who they want to work with, someone with good soft skills.

    Why Industry R&D Holds So Much Opportunity For PhDs

    Research & Development is a massive part of industry.

    According to UNESCO, the world spends $1.7 TRILLION on R&D every year, and the US alone spends $478 billion on R&D annually.

    This is a huge amount of money and this large spend creates many, many opportunities for PhDs in industry R&D.

    Additionally, R&D is always changing always advancing – and maintaining a culture of innovation was one of the top concerns for R&D employers.

    As a PhD you are well suited to help companies maintain and build an innovative culture, and this is something you should communicate when you are talking with potential employers.

    According to the Innovation Research Interchange, more than 40% of the employers they surveyed said that one of their top innovation tactics is to hire new people.

    They are looking for new, fresh people who can bring innovative ideas to their companies.

    That is Ph.D.s.

    That is who you are.

    And finally, in industry as a PhD you will be paid what you are worth.

    According to Indeed, the average salary for a postdoctoral fellow is $48,000, while an industry Scientist role will earn you an average of $93,000 and a Principle Scientist role $145,000.

    In general, when you look at the averages across the board, you’re making at least twice as much in industry as you are in a postdoc.

    Industry provides the resources and opportunity for you to do meaningful innovative work and be paid well.

    Principal Scientist Career Track: A Conversation With Lilian Josephson, Ph.D.

    Isaiah: First, I thought to ask you, why did you pursue this career track right after getting your Ph.D.?

    Lillian: Actually, I wanted to do research, R&D career before I started grad school. I did one of those R&D internships when I was an undergrad that I fell in love with. It wasn’t academia lab that I fell in love with, it was Momentive industrial lab that said, “Well, we love you, but we can’t hire you with only an undergrad degree.” So, I was like, “Okay. I will do a Ph.D. in this.”

    Isaiah: Wow. Basically, you’re saying, getting a Ph.D. opened more doors for you in industry R&D.

    Lillian: Certainly, because this is a personal view.

    But I think having a Ph.D. will lead you further into the career. If you want to make it to a director level or VP level of a technical company, the Ph.D. is really an asset and a value.

    Isaiah: You went right from getting your Ph.D. right into industry, correct?

    Lillian: That is correct. I started at L’Oreal.

    Isaiah Hankel: That’s right. I bring that up because there’s this misconception that you need to do a postdoc to get into a scientist position at a big company or to get into a senior position, but you’re an example that you do not. You can transition right from getting your Ph.D. into an industry scientist position.

    Lillian: Yes, that is correct. I think too long a postdoc will actually prevent you from joining a company because they would be very confused as to which level they would put you in terms of being a scientist. Because after three to five years, companies start to hire from within or pull from other companies. Having a really long postdoc, whether it’s at one location or multiple locations, will affect your job prospects.

    **watch the video above to hear Lilian’s full interview

    Associate Research Scientist Career Track: A Conversation With Evan Dubiel, Ph.D.

    Isaiah: How have you been able to have more of an impact, on the industry side that in academia?

    Evan: To answer that question. I really have to look at like the end results of academia versus industry. The end result of academia that I worked in was you publish a paper, and it goes into pub med, and that is the end.

    And then when I think about the end result of working in industry, the end results specifically for me, and the company I work at, our end result is developing a pharmacokinetic or an immunogenicity assay, say so that we can analyze drug candidates of our clients.

    So that’s kind of, it’s a step to get in towards that end goal of getting a drug to market, to help people.

    This is really could be a direct impact on society that you maybe make a small contribution to, but even a small contribution is better to little to no contribution, which is what I feel most, at least my personal academic research went into.

    And that’s even I published in quite high impact journals, high as chemical reviews, which is a very high impact factor. I published in that. I really realized even doing that, there’s not a lot of, at least what I felt was a lot of impact.

    **watch the video above to hear Evan’s full interview

    Scientist Career Track: A Conversation With Natalie Fredette, Ph.D.

    Isaiah: What are some of the key things you’re going to look for right away when making a new hire?

    Natalie: So for me, now that I’m on the other side technical proficiency is very big deal. I can look at a resume and look at that in a very clean resume. If I see a jumbled resume with way too much detail, unfortunately now I’ll be prejudice to think you’re getting so caught up in some of details here that what if that happens in your work. So a beautiful resume that shows you know how to communicate well for me when I’m just screening. And we get hundreds of applicants for a single job.

    But when we have to go through and look through some of these, like I admitted, I’m tired, I’ve been looking at the same terms over and over again. So I want to see that you communicate really well. And once I see that you have you skills down with the first few questions, the next biggest thing for me is culture fit.

    We’re going to be working together a lot. We’re going to be in a lot of meetings, we’re going to have stressful deadlines and I need to know you get along. There are a lot of wonderfully competent scientists out there and I think that’s important and valuable. But I want to know you get along with the team.

    And we spent so much time and money in viewing candidates and going through the process and onboarding them. We don’t want, first of all for the candidate to feel uncomfortable when they get here or for us to feel uncomfortable when a candidate is accepts the position. We want to get along. And we want to gel because you need to work as a well oiled machine in industry to get you results fast.

    And so culture fit now is actually a really big deal to me and it should be a big deal to candidates too. You don’t want to be where you’re not wanted, you don’t want to be well you might feel uncomfy so don’t forget your interviewing them as much as us.

    Isaiah: If you could zoom out and you were talking to yourself, five years ago or a month before you got hired what advice would you give yourself in the job search? Specifically for getting into the type of role that you’re in now in R&D.

    Natalie: I had a very low point a few weeks before I got hired where they said that they were going to take me as a research associate and at the last minute backed out and said they’d just extend my post doc.

    And so I was literally actually, I was physically in tears at some points coming home from work realizing it wasn’t going to end.

    If I could go back to that person, I would look at them and just really shake myself by the shoulders and say, “Do not doubt that you are valuable.” Like never doubt that you are valuable. And make sure you keep that confidence that you are valuable. Because of that confidence in who you are and your skillset and what you can contribute to a scientific team is very apparent when you network.

    And as we all know, networking is very important, so keep your head up. Do not doubt your value and make sure that you’re putting that value and that confidence into your networking.

    Because you can tell now that I’m on the other side of things and I’m networking with people and I see them add value to me or see them competent in what they can do, it makes a big difference.

    So don’t forget your value. Know that you’re worth. Don’t relegate yourself and say, “Guess I’m going to take this third or fourth post doc.”

    You don’t have. Be confident. Know your value. Reflect that value in how you interact and network with others. Don’t forget to reflect your value.

    Watch the full podcast episode above to learn more about what it’s like to work in R&D from PhDs who have successfully transitioned from academia into an industry R&D position.

    To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now.

    The post Day In The Life Of A PhD Level Industry R&D Professional appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.


    New Networking Strategies For PhDs Who Hate Networking Feb 22, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to: 6:20 – Show Me the Data25:50 – New Networking Strategies For PhDs Who Hate Networking w/ David Bradford51:30 – How PhDs Can Get Hired Into Management Level Positions w/ Aja Isble1:03:00 – Clinical Research Associate Track w/ Yara Pujol Lopez, Ph.D. Do you struggle to see the point of networking and hate going to networking events? Ready to learn why you must invest in your network and how to make it fun? In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, we are very excited to welcome renowned networking expert, David Bradford as our guest. David is a proven business leader with over 35 years of experience. David is one of the most well connected people in the world (often called the ‘Human Internet’). He shares insight into how you can level up your networking strategies.Plus, we have two more special guests joining us on the show, the Director, New Product Planning, Gastroenterology at Takeda, Aja Davis Isble and Yara Pujol López​, Principal Clinical Research Associate at NAMSA. They will will discuss the intricacies of their career tracks and how you can pursue a similar career. About Our Guests David Bradford is a proven business leader with over 35 years of experience in the computer industry. David Bradford is the CEO of FluentWorlds which is revolutionizing Language training in 3D Virtual Worlds. David Bradford has previously served as CEO and Chairman of HireVue and Fusion-io. Both companies reached the Forbes list of America’s 50 fastest growing Tech companies. In October of 2013, Bradford was inducted into the Utah Technology Hall of Fame. From 1985-2000, Bradford served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Novell, Inc. (NASDAQ: NOVL), where he helped lead the networking start-up through a series of acquisitions, public offerings and business development activities resulting in sales growth of $35 Million to $2 Billion. He twice served as Chairman of the Board of the Business Software Alliance, the world’s leading industry trade association for the I.T Industry. Mr. Bradford has been honored as the “Alumnus of the Year” for the J. Reuben Clark Law School of Brigham Young University. Mr. Bradford has a Law Degree from Brigham Young University, a Masters in Business Administration from Pepperdine University and a B.A. in Political Science from Brigham Young University. David has been nicknamed the “Human Internet” by his wife of 45 years, Dr. Linda Bradford. She and David were named with four other Couples as the Top Couple in America in 2014. Aja Isble completed her M.Sc. in Pathology from the University of Iowa and obtained her MBA from Darden Graduate School of Business Admin, a Top 10 US MBA Program. She has over 10 years experience working in sales and marketing at Amgen, and in new product and strategy roles at Baxter, Baxalta, Shire. Aja recently accepted a position as Director, New Product Planning, Gastroenterology at Takeda. Yara Pujol Lopez is a Principal Clinical Research Associate at NAMSA, a medical research organization speeding product development for medical devices, IVDs, regenerative medicine and combination products. Yara earned her PhD Neuroscience from Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München. She is a results-oriented biomedical scientist specialized in neuroscience and molecular biology with +2 years experience working in pharmacological clinical trials (Phase II and IV) and medical device clinical trials in the fields of cardiovascular / vascular surgery, nephrology, diabetes and infectious disease such as sepsis and pneumonia. Key Takeaways 1. Your network is an incredibly important asset in your career. David Bradford outlines six timeless principles for networking your way to the top: 1. Start up. 2. Show up. 3. Follow up. 4. Link up. 5. Stand up. 6. Scale up. 2. Business acumen does not mean memorizing business lingo. It is your ability to make sound business decisions and that ability only comes by cultivating a through understanding of how businesses function. 3. Clinical Research Associate positions include working in hospitals as well as managing the more administrative side of clinical research. This allows for CRAs to progress into higher clinical roles, project management roles and even regulatory roles. Why Face To Face Networking Is So Powerful In Your Job Search Online networking is easy. You can sit in your comfy clothes and connect with people on LinkedIn, it’s pretty great. And these online connections can lead to wonderful opportunities, but the benefits of networking online are no where near as massive as the benefits of networking in person. A study, reported by Forbes, found that 85% of the survey respondents reported that face to face meetings offered a greater ability to build stronger more meaningful relationships. And 8 out of 10 respondents preferred in person meetings over virtual meetings, despite the flexibility that virtual meetings allow. It’s just not possible to beat the power of meeting up with someone face to face. When meeting in person you build stronger, more meaningful business relationships, you have the ability to read body language and facial expressions. We make all these snap decisions when we’re in person. We see people’s faces in person, their mannerisms, body language. It’s amazing. Meeting in person allows for more social interaction, more bonding, more complex strategic thinking. It creates a better environment for tough timely decision making. There is less opportunity for distractions and that results in higher quality decision making. When you meet someone via email, via a LinkedIn message, or even via video chat it is difficult to completely interact with that other person and you end up leaving a lot on the table in terms of networking with that person. Whenever possible meet up face to face. New Networking Strategies For PhDs Who Hate Networking: A Conversation With David Bradford Isaiah: Can you talk about what it was like to reach out and hire Steve Wozniak? Just because we’re talking to a lot of STEM professionals who want to get hired. I’m just curious. From your point of view, it might be interesting to hear a short version of that story. David: Actually this story illustrates some of the principles of my book. As you mentioned, I wrote a book, Up Your Game: Six Timeless Principles For Networking Your Way To The Top. I want to emphasize that networking, and this is the first principle, is all about thinking first of other people. I like to flip networking on its ear to begin thinking about other people. And so I was at a conference, and there’s lots of background, and you can read about it in the book, but I was at a conference in 2009 in Sun Valley, Idaho. I’d done a favor for somebody who’d asked me to meet with his son, talked to him about his legal career, etc. And then his son came back to me and says, “Oh by the way, I’ve got one more favor to ask. Can you drive to Sun Valley, Idaho and give a speech at this conference?” And I looked it up on Google Maps, and it was a five and a half hour drive from where I was, but I thought, “You know what? I’ll throw my golf clubs in the back. I’ll drive up, give my speech, play golf, and it’ll be a great time.” And so I did that, and I drove up. But you know, at that conference I gave my speech, and now I’m walking out of my speech. And a young man walks up to me, and he has some questions about what I was talking about. I took some time to visit with him. And as I was visiting with him, I saw a little white sheet of paper on a piano bench, something like that. And it says, “Keynote speaker conference, Steve Wozniak, inventor of the Apple computer.” And I went, “Oh my gosh. I’ve never heard Steve Speak.” And I knew Steve Jobs … Actually, he tried to sell us as company a couple of times in the late ’80s, early ’90s at Novell, but I’d never met the Woz. And so I had a choice, and this is a definitive moment in my life where I could have gone and played golf, which I love. People that know me know I love golf, and I’m a low handicapper, and so I was ready to go out and play some golf. But then I thought, “Do I stay for Steve?” And so I stayed for Steve. I called them up, said, “Golf course, I’m not going to make my tee time, etc.” So, the rest of the story is that … Sit in the front row. If you are going to go to a conference, be present, sit in the front row. And that day there was 500 people in the audience, but I sat in the front row. And I turned to the young lady next to me and I says, “My name’s David Bradford. What are you doing here?” She says, “Well, my name’s Julie Roebuck. What are you doing here?” And we started to exchange niceties. And I says, “Well, what do you do for living? She says, “Well, I’m Steve Wozniak’s executive assistant.” And when she learned a little bit about my background, she says, “Oh my gosh, you’re an IT guy. Would you mind staying around to visit with Steve after his speech?” She’s asking me, “Would I mind?” I said, “Of course,” and so we visited with Steve. And in fact, as we were walking out of the audience … or out of the thing that day, he handed me his business card. Now you can’t really see that, but I still carry it in my wallet to this day. And you can kind of hear it, but it’s a metal business card. So if you want to be noticed, if you want to be memorable, create a metal business card. Yeah. He handed me that. And I came back that night, and I’d just become CEO of a new company called Fusion-io. And I emailed him after our visit and I said, “Hey, would you consider joining my advisory board.” 24 hours later, Waz got back to me and he says, “I would be honored to join your advisory board.” Within three months, we’d hired him as our chief scientist. Isaiah: And so I want to make sure we have time to talk more about the book too. In terms of those timeless principles, what are they? Why are they important? Why did you narrow it down to these six? David: That’s a great question, and I appreciate it. I have observed the rise of social media. I was in the earliest days of the internet back the early ’90s. Mid ’90s, I was on a PBS special called Nerds 2.0: The inventors of the internet, or something like that. And so I’ve observed this whole phenomenon since 1980 when I got involved in the computer industry. And as I’ve watched that, I’ve seen the technology change, but the underlying principles do not. And so that’s where I came up with this concept of these. These are timeless principles, changing technology, but timeless principles. And so my six, just quickly, are: First, you start up your network by giving with no thought of getting. Like as I interacted with your folks as we prepared for this, I’m genuinely interested in them. I think God gave me some kind of a blessing that showed me some natural curiosity in other people. So, be curious, ask questions, get to know them. They will reciprocate. The second thing you’ve got to do in your life is to show up. The third thing is you follow up. Now that day had I just met Woz, and then not followed up that night with an extended email explaining our technology and so forth, nothing would’ve ever happened there. You’ve got to follow up, and follow up within 24 to 48 hours, then you become memorable. The fourth principle that I like to talk about is to link up. And today’s world of social media gives us that opportunity to link up via Instagram, Facebook, Google, whatever it might be, in email, so forth. The fifth principle is to stand up. Be a standup person in everything you do in your life. People will know that, especially today’s wild social media. If you create an act, or you do something that is off color or inappropriate in your life, people are going to know about it, so be a standup person. And then finally, sixth, scale up. You scale up your network by working hard at it. The word network has the word work in it. So it takes time. It takes effort. I spend probably an hour or two every day connecting, building relationships, etc. Isaiah: More and more companies are hiring in an automated way. Or they’re doing some sort of video interview before they bring people in, two follow up questions are: Number one, do you still bring these candidates in, in person after you choose the top ones? If so, why? And what do you look for when choosing the candidates? In the videos, what do you look for in general? David: Listen, I’ll give you a quick example. When I hired my first executive assistant at HireVue, I’d gotten 40 or 50 resumes that came in. I narrowed it to the top 12. And the person who was probably 10th place on paper, if you will, from just pure experience, she’s the one who got the job. “Why did she get the job?” is because I saw her in that video, demonstrated enthusiasm for what we were doing, a passion for what we were doing. And you could tell she was a doer in life, right? And so, Sharline Andersen was her name, and she was terrific. And she’s been a dear friend for many, many years now, once we hired her at HireVue. But the point is, if you demonstrate enthusiasm and interest in the company during that videoed interview, if you will, you’ll rise to the top of the list, even if your resume does not. How PhDs Can Get Hired In Management Level Positions: A Conversation With Aja Isble M.S., MBA Isaiah: I think a lot of PhDs have a hard time understanding how developing business acumen, how to speaking the language of business, can help them get into a job. Can you talk to us a little bit about that? Aja: Yeah, so first of all, does anyone know what acumen actually means in this context? So business acumen is simply making sound business decisions, and you can’t really do that unless you have a sense of what business actually is and how functions work together. They types of decisions that you can be required to make and how that impacts business overall. So it’s really about in some ways, kind of harking back to what we were just talking about, learning a language is a language to business that you need to learn, and there are words that you will never hear in any other context, or there are words that you guys know that have a completely different context in the business world. So without having that kind of context or that background, it can be very confusing in the business world, and it can be very confusing to see how you fit and where you should be making decisions, and where decisions are made elsewhere. Isaiah: Yeah, and maybe let’s dive in and talk about the biggest flubs that you’ve seen from PhDs or technical people who come in and try to have a business conversation but they don’t really understand what they’re talking about, versus someone who really digs in and develops that skill? Aja: Yeah, so actually funny enough I was at a conference last weekend and I actually talked about this within SMBA, and I was sitting in a bunch of scientific presentations, and the biggest flub that I saw there was the complete lack of recognition by the presenters that were industry professionals in the audience who may actually be interested in partnering with them, and the work that they’re doing. But they could not tell me why I should care about the work that they’re doing. So I have a very different viewpoint than someone who’s going to be sitting in R&D meetings all day, if you can’t tell me the implications of your work, if you’re continuing on about R&D, then you’ve lost me. You’ve lost an opportunity to work with me, you’ve lost an opportunity to work with industry even from like a business development perspective. So there’s a little bit of the understanding your audience and then tailoring what you say and how you say it to the audience. I realize that that’s presentation skills, but honestly, it’s the thing that’s going to help differentiate you from your peers. So there’s a little bit of the soft skills aspect of this, but then there’s also the harder skills and knowing the language to use when you speak about the work that you’re…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    7 Stages Of Career Change PhDs Go Through Feb 17, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to:

    3:16 – Show Me the Data
    19:27 – 7 Stages Of Career Change PhDs Go Through w/ Joseph Liu
    41:37 – Medical Science Liaison Career Track w/ Elizabeth Jeanne Thatcher, Ph.D.

    Are you struggling to make the shift from academia to industry?

    Ready to learn how you can initiate your own career change?

    In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, we are joined by Joseph Liu, a Career Consultant, Public Speaker, and Podcast Host who discusses how PhDs can successfully navigate career changes and pursue meaningful work. We also have on Elizabeth Jeanne Thatcher, Ph.D. Field Medical Director, Compound Lead at Pfizer, who gives us great insight into how she landed her first industry role as an MSL and the career path she took as she was promoted into her current role.

    About Our Guests

    Joseph Liu is a Career Consultant, Public Speaker, Podcast Host and Certified Coach who is dedicated to helping people pursue meaningful work. As the host of the Career Relaunch® podcast and a seasoned, international keynote speaker Joseph has crossed paths with thousands of professionals during their career turning points, sharing and learning about what it takes to successfully change career directions. He has shared these insights as a contributing writer to Forbes, Fast Company, and Glassdoor, and has been featured in The Guardian, SUCCESS magazine, Career Builder, HuffPost, Monster, The Muse, CityAM, and Square Mile.

    Elizabeth Jean Thatcher, PhD did her undergraduate training in biomedical engineering at Mercer University and Ph.D. in Molecular Biology at Vanderbilt. She then worked as a Research Fellow at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. With her pick of three concurrent job offers, Elizabeth transitioned into her first industry role as a Medical Science Liaison and later Medical Director at Piramal Life Sciences. She recently accepted a new role as the Compound Lead at Pfizer. Elizabeth is also a Program Leader for the Medical Science Liaison Alliance.

    Key Takeaways

    1. Career change is much more common than you think, and on average people change jobs 10 different times by the time they are in their 40’s.

    2. Most people go through 7 clear stages of career change which are: Doubt –> Dismay –> Mitigation –> Exhaustion –> Departure –> Reflection –> Decision

    3. There is so much more to a Medical Science Liason Position that just educating doctors and KOLs, if you really want to stand out you need to learn what it’s really like to be an MSL.

    Why Career Changes And Unemployment Are Way More Common Than You Thought

    It is much more common than you think to switch jobs and to have periods of unemployment.

    Your parents might have worked at the same company for 30 years, but that is very, very rare today.

    According to data published by the US Bureau of Labor Services, by the time a person is 48 they will have switched companies an average of 11 times.

    11 times.

    It is completely normal for your career to switch, shift and change,

    This could be a completely new career path or a merely a change to a new company.

    And with this change comes time in unemployment.

    It feels horrible when you are unemployed and you want nothing more than to find a job, but it’s important to realize that these career ‘gaps’ are totally normal.

    The US Bureau of Labor Services also reported that from age 18-44 on average a women will have spent 22% of the weeks during that time out of the labor force, and men on average were out of the workforce for 12% of weeks.

    That’s a significant percentage of time.

    So if you’ve been unemployed and are worried that it’s not normal or that no one will hire you because of it, stop worrying.

    7 Stages Of Career Change PhDs Go Through: A Conversation With Joseph Liu

    Isaiah: You’ve really narrowed down career change to these seven key components, and I would love to start just by hearing about those components?

    Joseph: Sure. Well first of all, thanks so much for having me on the show, Isaiah, and it’s really great to hear you talking about this topic of career change. I was listening into some of the interesting stats that you talked about, and I know that one of the things you pointed out was that people are changing careers quite often.

    And one of the things I noticed in my own line of work, because I do work with a lot of different career changers, is that they do go through pretty much seven common stages of career change, and it’s quite predictable, and it tends to follow the same pattern across industry, across sector, across geography, and I’ll just high-level summarize what they are right now, and I can … If you want me to go into more detail I’m happy to do that.

    Basically the first stage is doubt, where you’re feeling disengaged and you don’t like your job.

    Second stage is what I call “Dismay,” where you don’t like your career and you’re pretty convinced that you’re not that happy with your job and where your job is going.

    Third is mitigation, where you feel like, “Okay, maybe I’ll stick it out. Maybe I can fix this.”

    The fourth is exhaustion, where you’re trying to mitigate it and you’re trying to fix it, but it’s just physically and emotionally tiring and you’re wondering how much longer can you go on like this?

    The fifth is departure, where you decide that you really just can’t do this anymore, and sometimes that means leaving your job behind or leaving your past industry behind.

    The sixth is reflection, where you need a bit of a break and you reflect on what you want to do next.

    The seventh is the decision to relaunch your career and to start a new chapter in your career, similar to what you were talking about, maybe shifting out of a PhD to go into industry, or some other career change that involves a pretty major shift from what you were doing.

    Isaiah: I think a lot of us as PhDs were so stubborn that we stayed in that exhaustion stage for, I don’t know, two years, right? Longer? And so I guess maybe I’ll just jump in and say, what do you see that really makes people shift gears from that exhaustion stage to that critical deciding to leave stage? Is it just pain?

    Joseph: Well, Isaiah, that’s part of it. I think that first of all, like so, just to be clear, I did not do a PhD. I know plenty of people who have done a PhD. Actually, my wife has done a PhD, and she’s involved in academics right now. So she decided to stay down that path

    One of the things I saw with her with a PhD is that I know it’s really challenging, and really intensive, and sometimes you’re so deep into something and you’ve invested so much time into it, especially as you mentioned with a PhD, you’re investing years into that, that the inertia of that is really hard to walk away from. So I’ve found that people don’t tend to move on until they reach what I would call kind of a breaking point, where you feel like you’re completely drained, you feel like you’re spending your days pretending to be someone you’re not, you don’t feel like you’re developing as a person or a professional.

    And also you’re just in a bad mood all the time, not only at work, but other people in your life will start to notice that. So I know in my own life the moments where I’ve realized, “Gosh, I need to make a change” is when it’s actually started to trickle out into the rest of my life.

    And people have started to tell me, “Hey, you don’t look very happy. You’re not that fun to be around right now,” so I think that that’s when it really happens, when it turns from what has started off to be an ache, to something that’s completely debilitating.

    Isaiah: How do you get yourself to that seventh stage of, “I am ready to make a career change?” How do you empower that in yourself, or with other people, other tools, other support?

    Joseph: Well, so I’ll just start off by saying, Isaiah, that’s there’s not one magic bullet that I’ve found works well for people, and at the same time I have noticed similar patterns amongst people who have managed to successfully enable change in their careers, and I’ll just mention three that come to mind, moving you from that stage of being stuck to that stage where you’re really determined to relaunch your career.

    And the first one I think is just giving yourself permission to test the waters with something on the side.

    I think for whatever reason, either being too busy or just not feeling like you should be diluting your time and kind of experimenting with something on the side, people don’t tend to want to do that. But I’ve seen time and time again … Just to give you an example from the podcast that I host, a woman named Vicki Dane who’s based in London, she was a corporate lawyer. She ended up becoming a clinical psychologist, and she spent some time just … She literally worked on a farm, she learned to bake, she spent some time fishing. She just kind of explored, and so that really helped her gain some clarity to decide what to do next.

    Another thing that you can do is to try to surround yourself with the people doing what you want to do. So if people are shifting away from wanting to go into academics to working in the industry, one of the, I think, natural inclinations is to stick with the tribe you feel most comfortable with, and what I would say is if you want to enable career change, you almost have to force yourself to go spend some time with people in the industry, or with people who are in those jobs, or who have made the transition successfully into the career that you want to get into.

    And another example from the podcast, a woman named Reena Inie, who was a professional tennis player, and she ended up wanting to work in finance, and so she went to the London School of Economics, got her degree there, so surrounding herself with other people interested in that, and she went to Wall Street to surround herself with other bankers who were passionate about finance, so that’s another thing you can do. And then the final thing I’ll mention is just to make sure you re-craft and rehearse your personal brand pitch, which I know you were talking about before. Just trying to get really clear on … Not necessarily sticking with the vernacular that’s used in your current industry, but trying to use the vernacular of your target industry.

    Medical Science Liaison Career Track: A Conversation With Elizabeth Jeanne Thatcher, PhD.

    Isaiah: So you’re career has really taken off since you transitioned. I guess I just wanted to start from like a high level overview of what the transition process looked like, what these titles mean right? We’re talking about medical science liaison, but it’s in like the medical affairs field kind of, but it’s a specific role and now you have a director role. Can you help us understand I guess the framework of what these different roles are and how they fit together?

    Elizabeth: So medical affairs is really like a departmental title name. And under medical affairs there are many different areas where you could be employed, and it really depends on the company as to how they break it out, but field medical team is one of the areas under medical affairs. A lot of times regulatory affairs is also under medical affairs and medical information, which includes like medical writing is also under medical affairs usually. So it can be very an all encompassing phrase when you say medical affairs.

    Now if you’re in a tiny company, then they don’t have all of those different branches anyway, so it doesn’t seem as big. But in a big company like Pfizer, they have all of those branches plus some.

    Isaiah: What would you say is at the essence of the medical science liaison career path, if you had to define that in like a sentence or two, what is the main job of an MSL?

    Elizabeth: It’s hard to say because there are actually many jobs of an MSL, but the distinction that MSLs have in the medical affairs department is that they are the face to the customer or the healthcare provider, the KOL which we call key opinion leader in this field. So they are the face and the one stop shop for any interaction with the company. If anybody has any questions in my field for Pfizer, they would come through me, the [inaudible] advisor. And I am a master administrator essentially in discussing initial scientific insights with the KOLs as well as managing expectations for things that they possibly want to get back from Pfizer, because that’s a huge part of the job. You don’t want to break up a relationship because you gave them unrealistic expectations.

    Isaiah: And that’s what the word liaison means right, you’re a liaison between these two components. And how has your role changed as you’ve progressed into these higher level positions the more of the director manager lead positions versus the MSL. What are some of the changes that have happened?

    Elizabeth: So it obviously depends on the company but you know, an entry level MSL position is called usually an MSL. And then you have senior MSL, or some people call it an executive MSL. Then you have medical directors above them and then senior medical directors. You know, it goes like that. And basically you are just taking on more responsibility for medical strategy behind the scenes. And that medical strategy can encompass many things. It can encompass medical trial design, it can encompass publication strategy, it can encompass you know, advisory board focuses. And how the company decides to spend their millions of dollars on future clinical trials that you know, might have holes and you’re hearing in the field that people have concerns about X, Y, Z about your product, but if you haven’t done a clinical trial you can never answer that concern without real world data, so you help them figure out what is important for the field in order to communicate the correct science.

    Watch the full podcast episode above to learn more about how to make a smooth career change from Joseph Liu and learn more about the Medical Science Liaison career track.

    To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now.

    The post 7 Stages Of Career Change PhDs Go Through appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.


    How PhDs Are Elevating Their Career Performance in 2019 Jan 25, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to:

    4:30 – Show Me the Data
    18:50 – How PhDs Are Elevating Their Career Performance in 2019 w/ Steven Kotler
    51:30 – Quality Manager Career Track w/ Ranjani Muralidharan, Ph.D.

    Are you setting yourself up to perform well in your industry career?

    Ready to learn how you can elevate your career performance?

    In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, we are joined by Steven Kotler Director of Research at the Flow Genome Project and expert on peak performance divulges how PhDs can improve both their job search and career success. We also have on Ranjani Muralidharan, Ph.D. Quality Manager & Cosmetic Chemist, who discusses her transition into industry and what PhDs need to know about quality management.

    About Our Guests

    Steven Kotler is a New York Times bestselling author, an award-winning journalist and the cofounder and director of research of the Flow Genome Project. He is one of the world’s leading experts on high performance. His most recent work, Stealing Fire, was a national bestseller and nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. It documents an underground revolution in peak performance that is rapidly going mainstream, fueling a trillion dollar economy and forcing us to rethink how we lead more satisfying, productive and meaningful lives.

    Ranjani Muralidharan completed her Ph.D. in Analytical Chemistry at the University of South Florida. She then worked in environmental remediation as a Scientist. Ranjani recently transitioned to a new role as Quality Manager and Cosmetic Chemist at Malibu Wellness. In her spare time, Ranjani likes to volunteer at soup kitchens and medical camps at homeless shelters.

    Key Takeaways

    1. Multitasking, or switch-tasking, inhibits your performance and can decrease your ability to think creatively.

    2. When you are in a flow state is when you will perform at your peak.

    3. Reframe anxiety by remembering that the same chemical that causes anxiety causes excitement. It’s all about your perspective of the situation. Try Saying “I am excited” outloud to your self a few times to reframe the situation.

    Why Switch-Tasking Is Damaging To Your Performance And Your Career

    An article published in PLOSone, found that media multitasking, or quickly switching between different tasks, was associated with a decreased size of the person’s Anterior Cingulate Cortex. This area of the brain regulates how we decide what information is important, a key skill for making good decisions. This area also contributes to emotional and social control, aka your emotional intelligence.

    So multitasking is associated with a decrease in the size of the part of your brain that enables you to make good decisions and act appropriately in social situations, not good.

    Also, a study published in the journal of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences found that those who are known heavy task-switchers performed worse on cognitive performance tests than those who were light task-switchers.

    Employers want to hire people who will be performing at the highest possible state.

    Constantly switch-taking is keeping you out of the ‘zone’ or out of your flow state and preventing you from reaching your peak performance.

    How PhDs Are Elevating Their Career Performance in 2019: A Conversation With Steven Kotler

    Isaiah: I know that you’ve recently went from being a journalist to co-founding this Genome Project, which is quite a jump, right? When you’ve gone to these transition points, what initiated them, and then what has helped you make the transition no matter what the new topic was you were getting into?

    Steven: Those are interesting questions. So, one answer, I have found … Einstein famously said, “You can’t solve the problem you’re trying to solve at the level that you’re at.” I find oftentimes that’s very true in a career.

    So, sometimes, for example, when I wanted to get, and this going to sound really weird, but when I wanted to solidify my career as a book writer, I started a dog sanctuary because it got my mind off the topic of writing. I was so focused on the thing that I was trying to fix at my career and everything else, that I was too tight.

    And there’s a direct correlation between the amount of norepinephrine, which is essentially anxiety in your system and your ability to think creatively.

    Think about it as a spectrum, right? When you have a ton of norepinephrine in your system, you’re in fight or flight and you have two options. You can fight or you can flee, right? Or you can freeze, which is what happens when your brain gets both signals at once and you’re paralyzed, right? On The opposite end of that spectrum is flow, where you’re at peak performance and you can go in any direction at your best.

    So, the more norepinephrine your system, the less creative you can be. It basically shrinks the size of the database search by the pattern recognition system, if that makes sense. So, often times if you’re really focused on a problem, you’re not getting creative ideas. None of the insights are coming in.

    So, when I’m really stuck and I want to sell something, I often start another enterprise that’s bigger, harder, more complicated, along those lines. So a lot of what you’re looking at in my career is me actually trying to solve a different problem than the one it looks like I’m trying to solve.

    Isaiah: I love the way that you talk about basically hacking this and taking on another project to reframe your current project. So basically, you’re just reframing, right?

    Steven: Yeah, and there’s scales of reframing. This is a crazy study they did at Harvard recently where they wanted to know, because anxiety and excitement are the same signal. They’re both norepinephrine. So the only difference is the frame you put around it.

    So they asked at Harvard, they said, “Okay. Is it easier if you’re stressed out to reframe anxiety as excitement,” and I’ll tell you how to do that in a second, “Or to use breath meditation, mindfulness, to calm yourself down?” And they were looking at sympathetic and parasympathetic responses.

    They found that breath meditation takes five to seven minutes to calm you down, to get you actually at the point where your brain is released and you have some cognitive freedom to be creative, to think, whatever.

    Reframing, literally all you have to do is think about your problem. Get this feeling forth, the somatic egress, and say out loud, “I am excited. I am excited. I am excited,” three times. And literally, because it’s the same signal, so oftentimes, we’ll get the signal and we’ll think, “Oh my god, this is anxiety. I’m feeling anxiety,” when we’re actually a little excited.

    We’re not even noticing it, so just that little shift is enough. Three times out loud. How is that for fast reframing? This is the thing I was doing, starting. That’s the extreme other side of it. You can go small all the way up to huge in terms of using reframing as a tool.

    Isaiah: How can we trigger the flow state?

    Steven: Well first thing it shows is that multitasking is a lie. We’re all serial taskers. Anybody who tells you they’re multitasking is lying to you. We can’t do it. Flow only shows up when all of our attention is in the here and now. What all these triggers do, is they drive our attention into the now. If I were to say this neurobiologically, I would say they either release dopamine and norepinephrine, which are the brains’ two principal focusing chemicals, or they lower cognitive load, so all the crap you’re trying to think about at once. But both things allow you to pay more attention to the present. So the triggers do one of two things.

    What we found for creativity is, the first is complete concentration in the present moment. So no cellphone, no internet, no … I get up at 4:00 in the morning and start writing, and I don’t even have lights in my office. I write in Focus View, so if you’re not familiar with Focus View in Word it literally just shows you the text. Everything else is blacked out. Literally I’m in my office, no lights anywhere. There’s no phone. Internet’s turned … Everything’s off. All I can see is the words. And it’s 4:00 in the morning so nobody can call me, or you better have a good reason. So complete concentration really really matters.

    Let me make this more practical for people. When we work with companies, first thing is we tell them, “If you can’t hang a sign up on your door that says ‘Beep, blank off, I’m flowing’ you suck.” You have to be able to … Open office plans are terrible, and if you’re in that kind of situation … WeWork has got these new little phone booth pods, right? This is about the fact that we can’t be distracted. The brain doesn’t multitask and open office plans are disastrous for performance because they’re disastrous for flow.

    Quality Manager Career Track: A Conversation With Ranjani Muralidharan, PhD.

    Isaiah: How did you learn about this quality manager career track? What was your initial touch point, in terms of making this transition to this promoted role?

    Originally, when I applied for this role, it was a cosmetic chemist role. They had advertised as a cosmetic chemist, and since I have worked in pharmaceutical, not the cosmetic industry before, I thought this would be a good transition for me.

    When I came in and I had the interview, and they’d look at my resume, I had a lot of other things that I had experience with, like making SOPs, writing work flows in my previous company. So they thought that I was not just … I can be hired … I can do more than being a chemist, also.

    Of course, I have to thank Cheeky for tweaking my resume, and making it look … I had a three paged resume. Thanks to you guys, I brought it down.

    So then, they actually changed the role. They made it the quality manager and cosmetic chemist after having the interview. Originally, it was just advertised for a chemist.

    Isaiah: What do you do on a day to day basis?

    Okay. So, as my responsibilities in the current job, of course the first thing is I am a cosmetic chemist. In a formulation for cosmetics, it’s very different than how it happens for drugs. So I’m learning to be a cosmetic chemist, which is good, because I have two really amazing chemists. One has been in this field for 35 years just doing cosmetics, and the other is more than 10 year. So we as a team, I’m trying to be in the lab to learn how to formulate all the different skin care, hair care products. We have shampoos, dyes, all different kinds of products here.

    So that’s one role, and then the other one is quality manager. So what happens is when I come in, in the morning, first thing I do is go and check if everything is set for the production to happen. So, I do … It’s not like the confidence and stuff, but more the quality perspective, if everything matches what it says it should be. For example, the shampoo is being made, if it goes in the right bottles and how are … So, looking at the production floor, different parts in the production floor, the packaging and the filling, the making of the product. Just making sure everything is right for them to get started. During the day also, I have to go every hour and make sure everything is running the way it should be running.

    So, a lot of wearing a number of hats. But it’s very … It’s good learning, and I enjoy doing it. I get to be a part of the lab also, and also get a bigger perspective. If I make a product, I’m gonna make in a smaller batch. But then when it gets approved, it’s gonna be zoomed up, and they’re gonna make a patent of that, and then they’re gonna 4000 lbs of that shampoo which was formulated in the lab.

    Isaiah: And what are some of the people that you work with on a day to day, more in those cross-functional, lateral roles in other departments?

    Yeah. So I work with the chief scientific officer who is in the lab, and then work with the production manager, work with the inventory manager. I’m also in touch with the director of the company. And of course the field, the manufacturing plant, the people who do all the manufacturing, I’m in touch with them. So I interact with close to 10-15 people on a daily basis, yes.

    Watch the full podcast episode above to learn more about how to perform at your peak from Steven Kotler and learn more about the quality manager career track.

    To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now.

    The post How PhDs Are Elevating Their Career Performance in 2019 appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.


    How To Optimize Your Job Search As A PhD By Doing Less, Not More Jan 18, 2019
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to:

    1:20 – Isaiah’s Job Tip: Leverage The Fact That People Read Your Resume In A ‘F’ Pattern
    4:45 – Show Me the Data
    23:40 – How To Optimize Your Job Search w/ Dr. James Gould

    Are you making your job search harder than is needs to be?

    Do you know what key steps you can take right now to boost your job search?

    In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, we are joined by Dr. James Gould from Harvard University, an experienced career consultant who actively coaches postdoctoral fellows and encourages them to consider new career options. He shares great insights into how PhDs and Postdocs can leverage their unique skills and find a rewarding career.

    About Our Guest

    James Gould completed his Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and his postdoc at the National Cancer Institute. While a postdoc, he joined the NCI Center for Cancer Research Fellows and Young Investigators Steering Committee and began his transition. James is a Presenter, Speaker, and Career Consultant and his given workshops and invited talks all over the US. He is currently the Director at the Office for Postdoctoral Fellows at Harvard Medical School. He has also written numerous articles about the PhD job search, such as this one which appeared in Nature.

    Key Takeaways

    1. Doing a postdoc hurts your career.

    2. For the best job search results start about a year from when you need a job cultivating, maintaining and then activating your strong network of people.

    3. The job search process begins with self-reflection.

    Why Doing A Postdoc Is A Bad Idea

    Very recently, Nature, published an article that examined the impact of doing a postdoc on a person’s salary over the long term. What they found was quite shocking.

    The study showed that doing a postdoc actual means you will earn less money throughout your career than someone who did not do a postdoc. In industry, government and non-profit organisations those employees who did a post doc made less money than those who did not do a postdoc over the 15 year length of the study. See the image from this paper below.

    So, unless you become a professor (which is very, very unlikely) doing a postdoc is not only unnecessary, it will cause you to earn less money during your career.

    If you have already done a postdoc, don’t worry, you can leverage this experience to get hired in industry. But it all about how you communicate your skills. You must learn how to make the skills you learned as a postdoc relevant to the company where you want to work so they can see your value.

    Now is the time to start your industry job search so you can find a position where you can leverage your PhD and doing meaningful work.

    How PhDs Can Optimize Their Job Search: A Conversation With Dr. James Gould

    Isaiah: What do you think should be the biggest career priorities for a PhD or postdoc who is trying to ensure that they actually have options for their career?

    James: The biggest career priority … that’s a difficult question. But in my mind, I think it should be a few things. If you can do these top three things: being an absolute expert in your field or technology or technique, being a visible person in that field, and then also cultivating, maintaining and activating a vibrant network of former schoolmates, former lab mates and maybe even future employers. Those might be top three. But I can talk about 30 other things that you should be doing as well.

    Isaiah:What are the two things you could do right now to set yourself up in a career? We were talking about the Pareto principle a little earlier, so I’ll ask you what 20% of your activities can bring you 80% of the results in your job search?

    James: What you can do right away would be making sure you’re not doing this alone. Reach out for help and keep those lines of communication and those lines of help active, and making sure that you don’t become isolated and then maybe burnt out and turn into a negative mindset, as you had mentioned.

    Again, I will repeat, activate your network and continue to cultivate that network. And what I mean by activating in this sense is that you might know you’re going on in the market sooner or later, or you might even be on the market and just haven’t done this yet.

    So one of the quickest ways to find positions and hear about new things and reconnect is to just reach out and activate the people that you know.

    Tell them you’re on the market. Don’t necessarily ask for them for anything yet, but tell them you’re on the market and if they hear or know of anything … just more of a passive request. The third thing would be to be, you would probably like this phrase, cross training, and making sure what you’re doing is multipurpose, to give yourself the most bang for your buck. If you’re going to do something already, it’s on your calendar, it’s research related or career related, make sure you’re doing five other things while you’re there. I’ve mentioned this before in our webinars and chats.

    If you’re going already to your departmental seminar weekly or monthly, make sure you’re introducing yourself to the speaker. Make sure you follow up with the speaker. Make sure you introduce yourself to somebody or a group of people that are new that you haven’t sat next to. So making sure what you’re doing and just expand that to the rest of your rest of your daily life. If you go to lunch in the cafeteria, make sure you introduce yourself, maybe sit in someone else’s table. Most of the time they won’t mind.

    The other thing is making sure that you’re coming from a mindset and a perspective of positivity and moving forward. Making sure that you’re planning out your next strategic move. What’s the next logical step for you? Rather than coming from a place of fear or frustration. It’s okay to feel that. It might even be very close to the grieving process, but making sure that your decision making isn’t coming from a place of fear, but you’ve moved through that through reaching out for help, through activating your network, through cross training, and making sure that you’re moving in a positive forward … creating positive and forward momentum.

    Isaiah: What is the job search process, in terms of just sequence? What’s the sequence you would suggest, given your expertise?

    James: The sequence is, if you have the time and if there’s a timeline, I would say, you give yourself at least a year when you know you’re on the job market or going to the other job market. The longer the better, but probably a year.

    The first thing is do a fairly in-depth self reflection.

    What do I like to do? What am I good at? What are my values? Begin to think. Who do I know that shares these things? Who can I reach out to? What resources do I have institutionally in the lab, at my alma mater? If you’re a post-doc, you have at least two alma maters. Your undergrad school, your graduate school, and you might have even gone to medical school, so that’s three. You have all these resources that are just within your grasp.

    So, you reach out and you say, what are the trends, what have you seen, where have graduates from these school or people from this lab, where have they gone on. Actually can I have their contact information and reach out to them? So, you begin to refine your vision for the perfect job for you. It may not be the first one out of post-doc or grad school, but hopefully within two or three jobs, you are very close.

    You get this idea, you visualize your ideal job and you begin talking to people who you feel had jobs that are very close to that. Get their insights and you begin crafting your application materials, and you might be passively holding in job ads and opportunities. If there’s something that you absolutely can’t pass up then you need to move on very quickly. Give yourself time to digest what’s out there and learn how to read job advertisements, and learn how to read between the lines and learn how to find out who are you going to be reporting to, and then maybe reach out to them or somebody in that company or in that institution.

    The job search is much more self reflective and inter-personal than anybody gets a credit for.

    That would be a general sequence. Then, you go to a career counselor, a coach, Isaiah or myself and say, do you think my materials are strong enough for me to start applying now? And then you go through a series of revision, maybe peer review, expert critique and then begin to apply. Very strategic, very focused and targeted.

    Watch the full podcast episode above to learn more about how to make your job search optimal from Dr. James Gould.

    To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now.

    The post How To Optimize Your Job Search As A PhD By Doing Less, Not More appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.


    Why Leadership Is The Most Important Transferable Skill For PhDs Dec 28, 2018
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to: 0:10 – Show Me the Data14:10 – Why Leadership Is The Most Important Transferable Skill For PhDs w/ Peter Bregman40:40 – Immigration Concepts That International PhDs Looking To Work In The US Must Know w/ Brian Getson What does it mean to be a leader? Do you know how to communicate your leadership skills to employers? In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, Author, Speaker, CEO and Leadership Expert, Peter Bregman, discusses how PhDs can develop their leadership skills and become great leaders in industry. Peter gives us strategies to assess and close your leadership skill gap. Plus we have on immigration lawyer, Brian Getson, who discusses key concepts and intricacies of visas, green cards, and immigration. About Our Guests Peter Bregman has worked with CEOs and senior leaders to help them create accountability and inspire collective action on their most important work for more than 30 years. He helps leaders to develop their leadership skills, build aligned, collaborative teams, and overcome obstacles to drive results for their organizations. Peter has a deep understanding of both organizations and people and has dedicated his entire career to finding solutions that bring the interests of both together. He has implemented his proprietary solutions with CEOs and senior leaders in many of the world’s premier organizations, including Allianz, American Express, Brunswick Group, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, FEI, GE Capital, Merck, Clear Channel, Nike, UNICEF, among others. Peter is a sought-after speaker and thought leader in the areas of leadership development, organizational change, productivity and emotional courage. Peter is the author of the best selling book, Leading With Emotional Courage. Brian H. Getson, Esq. has extensive experience preparing EB-1A, EB-1B and NIW petitions for scientific researchers throughout the United States. After graduating cum laude from Duke University, Mr. Getson attended The University of Pennsylvania Law School. Upon receiving his law degree in 1995, he joined the Firm and concentrated his practice on immigration law. Mr. Getson is a frequent speaker on the green card process for scientific researchers at annual meetings of the world’s most prestigious scientific organizations including The American Society for Cell Biology, Materials Research Society, American Chemical Society, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Physical Society, and The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Key Takeaways 1. The time it takes for 50% of an academic cohort to leave academia has shortened from 35 years in the 1960s to only 5 years in the 2010s. 2. If you’re willing to feel everything, even your most fear emotions, then you can do anything. 3. The four critical elements of leadership are emotional courage, confidence in yourself, connection to others, and commitment to purpose. The Types Of Cultures In Industry And Why Company Culture Is So Important A study, recently published in PNAS, found that the number of STEM professionals staying in academia has dropped dramatically over the last 50 years. The authors looked at cohorts of STEM academics from ecology, astronomy, and robotics. They found that in the 1960s half of those who started their careers in academia were still in academia 30 years later. Which means that 50% a cohort would spend their entire career in academia. This is very different than what they found for the 2010s. After just 5 years, 50% of the STEM cohort had already left academia. That means that majority of STEM PhDs are leaving academia after just 5 years. So you must be prepared to get a job outside of the university setting. And a big part of getting hired in industry is showing a potential employer that you will bring lots of value to their organizations, including the ability to lead. But what does it mean to be a leader? And what makes a good leader? One McKinsey study, evaluated the leadership traits of the leaders at successful companies vs not-as-successful companies. The study found that 4 key leadership traits emerged in the most effective leaders: being supportive, operating with a strong results mindset, seeking different perspectives and solving problems effectively. Why Leadership Is The Most Important Transferable Skill: A Conversation With Peter Bregman Isaiah:I think would be smart for us to answer is, what exactly is emotional courage? Peter: So emotional courage is, and in the book I talk about these four elements of leadership. And just looking at what you were talking about beforehand in terms of the four underlying skills that make leaders most effective, and I don’t disagree with those actually I think getting business results, and supporting people and all that stuff’s really important, and what I talk about is what underlays the ability to do that, and it’s these four elements of being confident in yourself, connected to others, committed to purpose, and emotional courage. We can talk more about them, but they underlay, meaning if you aren’t those four things you’re going to have a hard time driving business results, you’re going to have a very, very hard time supporting other people et cetera. Emotional courage is the willingness to feel things, and this is actually particularly important I think with a PhD audience where you have honed your ability and your mind to think through things in very discerning ways, right?: very rational and discerning ways, and that’s the … you know I don’t have a PhD, I have a masters, but that’s the academic process right, the academic process is very much logic and thinking through things. Now I’m going to challenge you to do a little activity, which is to think about a hard conversation that you’re not having, a hard conversation that you know you should have, and this is for everybody listening. A conversation you know you should have, you know it’s important, it doesn’t have to be work, it can be personal it can be anything you want. But you know you should have this conversation, but you’ve procrastinated on it, you haven’t had it, and now consider why you haven’t had it. I’m willing to bet you know everything you need to know in order to have it, you have plenty of skills in order to have that conversation, you’ve have time and opportunity. But if that’s true, then why don’t you follow through on something like that? It’s because there’s something you don’t want to feel, that if you have this hard conversation, you may have to feel conflict, you may have to feel disconnection, you may have to feel their passive aggressiveness after the conversation, you might have to feel your anger, or their anger, you might have to feel shame, or embarrassment, or they might come back at you and you might get defensive, and because you don’t want to feel any of these things, then you’re better off not having the conversation, you hold it off. But if you’re willing to feel everything, if you’re willing to feel conflict, and failure, and shame, and embarrassment, and defensiveness, and passive aggressive, if you’re willing to feel everything, then you can do anything. If you think about, this is true for any risk that you take and any … you’re giving a lecture and it’s risky, and you’re going to be approaching it in a certain way, or you’re working in an organization and you have to contradict someone and certainly you need the skill to do it well, but ultimately you need to be willing to feel what you have to feel in order to take the risk to follow through on what’s important to you, and you might feel the insecurity, and the vulnerability of speaking up when nobody else is speaking up and you see something that’s important to raise, and those are emotional issues, those are the sort of, “Do you have the emotional courage, the willingness to feel everything in order to do those hard things?”, and that is the key that unlocks every other element. Isaiah: Okay, I hate feeling because I’m a thinker. I’m STEM PhD, how can I tiptoe into that? How can I practice? How can I get more comfortable with those feelings? Peter: Right, so first it’s just acknowledge what’s going on. That’s huge, right? To recognize there’s some feelings that are getting in my way and I’m actually really used to thinking. When I work with academics, too I’ll often say something like, “What are you feeling?” The answer will be, “I think I’m feeling xyz” It’s because we’re so used to leveraging our intellect. The first thing to do is to recognize and begin to notice what you’re feeling. Really begin to feel. That’s actually really important. Then begin to locate the feeling. Once you’ve done that then you realize oh, this feeling just a sensation. This feeling of insecurity is a sensation and my mind runs wild, everyone’s going to hate me and I’m going to say something stupid and then I’m going to lose all my job opportunities and then, step, step, step, step, step I’m homeless. If you can kind of step away from that a little bit and go oh, I have this sensation and it’s kind of in my chest. This is what it feels like. This is what it feels like to walk into a room of strangers and start to meet them, right? I think the first step is are you willing to feel? Notice what you’re feeling and notice where you’re feeling it. My two favorite sentences are what are you feeling and where are you feeling it? Notice that. Then, don’t wait for that feeling to go away. I was trying to do some writing. I’ve written four books and I have confidence in my nonfiction in my writing. I don’t have confidence in my fiction writing. I actually don’t think that I’m a very good fiction writer at all. I’ve been having a hard time writing fiction. I said this to a friend of mine and she said, “Well, what’s stopping you? Like you just sit down and you write. What’s stopping you?” I said, and by the way, anyone who is working on your dissertation may be able to connect with this. I said, “You know, I think I’m scared. I think I’m not good. I think I’m scared I don’t know how to do this. I think, you know, I have a reputation. I’m a best seller and now I’m going to write terrible stuff? I’m scared.” She laughed and she said, “Oh, you think you’re supposed to be able to write without feeling scared?” It was this great ah ha, we wait for the emotion to go away until it feels great to do what we need to do, but the reality is, you have to do that even when it doesn’t feel good the idea is sit down, don’t wait for the fear to go away. Write while you’re feeling afraid. Write the dissertation while you’re feeling afraid. Walk into that room when it doesn’t feel right to walk in the room and recognize that you’re going to feel that and that’s what it feels like when you walk into a room of strangers and start to connect with people. Walk into that room while you’re feeling insecure and just keep moving and that’s what allows you to develop the emotional courage. Isaiah: What are the four critical elements of leadership? Peter: Emotional courage is one. There’s three other ones. It’s confidence in yourself, connection to others, commitment to purpose. Confidence is not arrogance. Arrogance is I think I’m better than everybody else. Arrogance is born of insecurity. When I’m arrogant it’s actually because I’m not feeling confident. The people that think they’re better than everybody else, who consistently walk in feeling like they’re the smartest guy in the room, or the smartest woman in the room and they know everything. They’re not confident, actually. Confidence, and this is really important for academics. Confidence is the willingness to say I don’t know something. It’s the willingness to be curious. All of great academia, all great academic learning and teaching is based on curiosity. Right? You can’t be curious without also being confident. Curiosity is about the unknown. Connection to others is what’s going on between us and can I build trustworthy relationships and can I trust you and be trusted by you? Can I see you and appreciate you and be seen and appreciated by you? You can not lead without confidence and connection. There are people who are strong in one and not strong in the other. I could be super confident and not very connected, in which case it’s still all about me. Even if I’m willing to not know, even if I’m … It’s still all about me and I don’t care what’s going on for you. Conversely, I could be super connected to you but not particularly confident and then I lose myself. We all know people who will give themselves up to please the people around them. Here’s a great test of it, especially as an academic, go into a conversation with an opinion and have a conversation with someone with the opposite opinion. This could be anything, it could be politics, it could be your area of expertise, if could be anything. Go in there and have a conversation with them where your opinion isn’t threatened by their opposite opinion and you both leave feeling respected and seen and appreciated. Right? I don’t have to change my perspective because it’s different than yours, but I also don’t have to change your perspective because it makes me uncomfortable that it’s different than mine. The ability for us to really be able to hold both of those and hold the relationship at the same time is critical in terms of powerful leadership. That’s confidence and connection. Commitment to purpose is what is this bigger thing that we’re all going to align behind? This is something we do a lot of work in organizations. Helping them to create collaborative, coherent, productive movement in a particular direction. It’s also about making choices. About what you say no to in order to say yes to other things. That’s really hard. Commitment to purpose is about distinguishing signal from noise. It’s about focusing on what’s most important, right? I could be super committed in my area of study and to purpose and I could think that I’m really committed, but if it’s 15 years and I haven’t written my dissertation yet then the answer is I’m not very good at distinguishing signal from noise. Then finally emotional courage, which we just talked about, the willingness to feel. You can not make moves to develop your confidence in yourself, your connection to others and your commitment to purpose without also developing and leveraging your emotional courage, or willingness to feel things because any time you build that you’re going to feel stuff. By the way, this is not like a personality assessment where it’s okay to be strong in some things and weak in others. You really want to, if you’re going to be an effective leader you need to be strong in all four of these things. Immigration Concepts For International PhDs In The USA: A Conversation with Brian Getson Isaiah: What is the most common way for foreign nationals to apply for a green card based on employment? Brian: Sure, so most foreign nationals who are working in the US that are not conducting scientific research, they have to go through what’s called the PERM Labor Certification process. That involves having an employer sponsor you for the green card. You can’t file on your own and the employer has to conduct recruitment that is mandated by the labor department such as putting ads in Sunday newspapers and conducting other recruitment online in order to show a lack of US worker availability. In order to show a lack of US worker availability. So for jobs that do not involve scientific research, that’s generally the only option available to obtain a green card. Isaiah: So what can PhDs do to avoid this and get a green card based on their research accomplishments? So the theme of today is leadership, Isaiah. And that lends itself to being a leader in your research field. So if you have made scientific accomplishments that have impacted or influenced your field, then you can look to avoid this labor certification process and apply for a green card based on your own re…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    How PhDs Show Employers They Are The Right Fit For The Company Culture (Cheeky Scientist Radio) Dec 21, 2018
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to:

    1:20 – TOP TIP: It’s not you, academia is a cult
    8:55 – Show Me the Data
    22:45 – How PhDs Show Employers They Are The Right Fit For The Company Culture w/ Daniel Coyle
    46:58 – Technical Director Career Track w/ Ron Hunter Ph.D.
    1:00:46 – Top Mistakes Made By Researchers In The Green Card Application Process w/ Brian Getson

    Do you know what company culture is?

    Do you know how to find a company culture that is right for you?

    In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, bestselling author of The Culture Code, Daniel Coyle, discusses what company culture is, why it is powerful and how you can influence a company’s culture. Then Ron Hunter, PhD from Mérieux NutriSciences, shares insights from his non-linear career path and how he was hired as a Technical Director. Plus, immigration lawyer, Brian Getson will also join us to discuss top mistakes made by researchers in the green card application process.

    About Our Guests

    Daniel Coyle is the New York Times bestselling author of The Culture Code, The Talent Code, The Little Book of Talent, The Secret Race (co-authored with Tyler Hamilton), and other books. Winner (with Hamilton) of the 2012 William Hill Sports Book of the Year Prize, he is a contributing editor for Outside Magazine, and works as a special advisor to the Cleveland Indians. Coyle lives in Cleveland, Ohio during the school year and in Homer, Alaska, during the summer with his wife Jen, and their four children.

    Ron Hunter completed his PhD in analytical chemistry at Emory University. Next, Ron worked on projects related to toxicology and public health at the Environmental Protection Agency, Emory’s Rollins School of Public Health, and Centers for Disease Control. He then spent three years in a scientist role at The Coca Cola Company. Ron recently started a new job as the Technical Director of Chemistry for North America at Mérieux NutriSciences.

    Brian H. Getson, Esq. has extensive experience preparing EB-1A, EB-1B and NIW petitions for scientific researchers throughout the United States. After graduating cum laude from Duke University, Mr. Getson attended The University of Pennsylvania Law School. Upon receiving his law degree in 1995, he joined the Firm and concentrated his practice on immigration law.

    Mr. Getson is a frequent speaker on the green card process for scientific researchers at annual meetings of the world’s most prestigious scientific organizations including The American Society for Cell Biology, Materials Research Society, American Chemical Society, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, American Physical Society, and The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Key Takeaways

    1. Culture can be defined by how people interact and how people respond to change.

    2. To learn about a company’s culture ask the employer to tell you a story about their group that would not happen anywhere else, ask how people are rewarded, and ask to speak with previous group members.

    3. You can’t be opportunistic. Realize you’re not going to be a good fit for every company. If you’re just not vibing with a company, let it go and move on.

    The Types Of Cultures In Industry And Why Company Culture Is So Important

    The Harvard Business Review published an incredible article that breaks down the nuances of what makes a company culture.

    The article identified two main concepts that define a culture:

    1. How people interact
    2. How people respond to change

    From those concepts the authors created 8 distinct culture types. The two most common culture types were ‘Results’ and ‘Caring’ oriented cultures.

    When you are doing informational interviews, asking questions about ‘how people respond to change’ and ‘how people interact’ is a great way to learn about the company culture. Are there strict lines of communication within the company? Or is it more flexible? Are there clear guide for what to do in uncertain situations or does change create dialogue where a collaborative effort is used to decide how to proceed?

    Understanding the vulture of a company is key to demonstrating that you are a good fit and for finding a company where you will be happy.

    Growth Everywhere reported that companies who have happy employees outperform their competition by 20% and that when employees are happy they are 12% more productive. Employers want to know that you will fit into their organization well, because it will impact the performance of the company.

    How PhDs Show Employers They Are The Right Fit For The Company Culture: A Conversation With Daniel Coyle

    Isaiah:I thought we could start very simple in just helping everyone here understand what culture is.

    Daniel: Culture is an interaction that causes humans to add up to more than the sum of their parts. If you think about most human groups most of them add up to less. If you take the individual talents and the talents of the entire group, most human groups add up to less. Strong culture is when you can have a high ratio of what you’re producing versus what goes in. So it can be defined in a lot of different dimensions. That’s sort of my favorite because it’s what we sense.

    When you walk into a good restaurant, when you walk into a good school, when you walk into a great family, you feel it. You can feel it in the interaction, so we’ve got this feeling that it’s kind of this magical thing that some people have in their DNA, that’s the way we typically thought about culture.

    But what the science is showing us, and what I spent the last five years sort of obsessing about is, you can see it. You can measure it. It is a set of interactions and deep human grammar that’s in our brains. It feels like magic. It ain’t magic. It is a sentiment or actions that causes people to add up to more, and so that’s kind of the roughest definition of it.

    But as you know, it’s more powerful than strategy. It’s more powerful than execution. It’s sort of the most powerful human force in the world.

    Isaiah: How are employers evaluating job candidates on whether or not they’d be a good culture fit?

    Daniel: There’s a few different ways to look at this. A lot of places don’t have a good definition of what culture is, and when they think about fit, they just think about hiring someone who’s like us, creating some kind of a monoculture. And that actually can be a sign that you’re maybe not in a great culture.

    What’s smart employers are looking for is, they’re looking for people who can grow and learn, not hiring for skills, but hiring for people who could not just fit, but I think a better word is contribute from an employer point of view. If you hire for fit, you’re hiring under a narrow aperture. If you hire for contribution, how do you create more cognitive diversity? How do you get more minds in there? Great cultures have zero tolerance for brilliant jerks, zero. That was one of the things that I realized in researching the book.

    They’re trying to test behavior, and you see more and more employers going, “Look, interviews are terrible predictors. Interviews don’t work very well, what works well is a behavioral sample.” So coming in for a sample day, working on a sample project, and during that project showing clear self awareness and ability to reflect and ability to confront mistakes and fix mistakes, because what business people realize today is that it is not a systems contest.

    It is a learning contest.

    It’s a group learning contest, and businesses that do that the best are going to win, and you cannot do that if you have people who are defensive when it comes to opportunities to learn.

    Isaiah: Just shifting gears to the job candidate side for a company. What kind of things can you do to make sure you’re finding the right company with the right culture for you? But also showing the company that you actually understand culture.

    Daniel: It’s a fascinating question, and there’s two questions that I think you can approach your prospective employers with, two dimensions to investigate in. Maybe there’s three things.

    First, ask the employer to tell you a story about their group that would not happen anywhere else. Tell me a story about your group that doesn’t happen other places. That ends up being a very informal, very organic, but Litmus test. If they have three of four of those stories queued up. When you ask that question, “Tell me a story about something that doesn’t happen anywhere else,” you can quickly get to the things that really matter. Good groups have got 10 of those stories.

    Another question you can ask is, “What gets rewarded around here?” It’s a difficult question, kind of a complex question to answer. “What gets rewarded around here? What kinds of performances really get awarded around here?” That matters.

    The third thing you can do is go and see if you can talk to people who recently left the group. A good culture, a strong culture, will happily, happily connect you to people. The cultures that I visited, the cultures that I included in the book, they all really had learning and development as the core. They realized that this isn’t some kind of a kumbaya family they’re creating where we can all stay together the rest of our lives, but they do realize, they do make the promise to their people, “When you leave here you will be smarter.”

    Technical Director Career Track: A Conversation with Ron Hunter, Ph.D.

    Isaiah: What does transition look like? What are some of the key points, and if you could do it in two phases. All the challenges you faced both mindset-wise, maybe some technical challenges like a resume, or LinkedIn thing? And what did you change to get hired? And what about the actual transition story look like?

    Ron: So I think it depends on their job. I went from a Postdoc to a government job. And then I went from government job to industry job. And now industry job to industry job. So, I think the first thing for let’s say government or industry is that the resumes look different. The resumes are very different. The networking is different. I think as you say in the Cheeky Scientist Association Network, “Go to the events where you wanna meet the right people at.” CDC people aren’t hanging out where Coca-Cola people are hanging out.

    And then updating your resume to be more industry. So once I realized, hey, I wanna try to get an industry job, I needed to change my resume. Make it less federal and more succinct and then do the networking from that aspect of meeting people who worked in industry versus people who worked in government. That was one. And then the cultural transition from Postdoc to government job versus industry is that, as a Postdoc you’re still living that PhD life. And then when you get a “real job”, you have to learn how to navigate the politics, a different side of politics between the industry and government or any job that’s not academic.

    Isaiah: How do you stay who you are and navigate your way through all those different cultures and have people like you in different networks and different cultures? What do you do to stay true to yourself but also to adapt to the culture?

    Ron: I think the first thing that I always encourage people to do is always remember who you are principally, and to bring your whole self to whatever you do. You can keep that in the forefront of your mind, then everything else kind of flows accordingly. I’m also military kid, so I grew up traveling a lot. You kind of learn growing up that you need to make friends quick, because you’re only going to be there a short period of time. I think that in itself is a talent. And then you can’t be opportunistic. You’re not gonna be friends with everyone. You’re not going to be a good fit for every company. If, you’re just not vibing with someone, you just have to let that go.

    Watch the full podcast episode above to learn from immigration expert Brain Getson, to get even more company culture insights from Daniel and to learn more about what it’s like to work in as a Technical Director from Ron.

    To get advanced access to the full length versions of these podcasts, as well as access to our live training webinars, exclusive training videos, case studies, industry insider documents, transition plan, and private online network, get on the waitlist for the Cheeky Scientist Association now.

    The post How PhDs Show Employers They Are The Right Fit For The Company Culture (Cheeky Scientist Radio) appeared first on Cheeky Scientist.


    How To Avoid Being The Awkward PhD No One Wants To Hire (Cheeky Scientist Radio) Dec 07, 2018
    Show notes

    Skip ahead to: 1:20 – TOP TIP: Incorrect Job Search Workflow8:30 – Show Me the Data19:00 – How To Avoid Being The Awkward PhD No One Wants To Hire w/ Jordan Harbinger56:30 – Principal Scientist Career Track w/ Scot Matkovich Ph.D. Tired of being perceived as an awkward PhD? Want to be better at networking and relationship building? In this episode of Cheeky Scientist Radio, Jordan Harbinger gives practical strategies to improve your networking ability, to grow your confidence, and discusses the best ways to create meaningful professional relationships. Then Scot Matkovich, PhD comes on to discuss what it’s like to work in industry R&D and why he chose to make the switch from academia to industry. About Our Guests Jordan Harbinger, often referred to as “The Larry King of podcasting,” is a Wall Street lawyer turned interview talk show host, and communications & social dynamics expert.Jordan has hosted a top 50 iTunes podcast (The Jordan Harbinger Show) for over a decade which receives over 4 million downloads per month, making the show one of the most popular podcasts in the world. On The Jordan Harbinger Show, Jordan deconstructs the playbooks of the most successful people on earth and shares their strategies, perspectives, and practical insights with the rest of us.Jordan’s business sense, extensive knowledge of the industry, and contemporary approach to teaching make him one of the most sought-after coaches in the world. Scot Matkovich completed his PhD at the University of Melbourne. He then relocated to the USA and continued to make contributions to many aspects of cardiovascular research. Scot recently joined Eli Lilly as a Principal Research Scientist with the Diabetes and Cardiovascular Complications Group, where he is enjoying being more closely connected to interventions that will directly benefit heart failure patients. In his spare time, Scot is a musician and photographer. Key Takeaways 1. Networking is only awkward if you reach out with an ask before adding value. Use the ABG maxim – Always Be Giving. 2. Your non-verbal communication is key to the way you are perceived, practice having open and confident body language. 3. Your freedom to do research and ability to make an impact on society will increase when working in industry R&D. The Science Behind Being Charismatic A study, published in Computers in Human Behavior, looked at the difference between sort of how Steve Jobs spoke versus a reference sample of hundreds of other prominent speakers. They found that Steve Jobs had a distinct tone of voice. His voice was higher than the majority of these speakers and the standard deviation of his pitch level was much higher than the other speakers. Meaning that his pitch level varied a lot. His speaking was the opposite of monotone. Another study, published in The Leadership Quarterly, examined how charisma affects the success of a company. And specifically one of the items they researched was how does charisma effects shareholder return depending on the received market certainty. The study found that when the market was perceived being high the charisma of the CEO really increased shareholder return. Resulting on average in $130 million in wealth creation in just one year. In times of uncertainty people are more willing to get behind someone who is charismatic. How To Avoid Being The Awkward PhD No One Wants To Hire: A Conversation With Jordan Harbinger Isaiah: So how do you help someone A) gain self awareness over how they’re coming across, and then B) once they are aware that they’re maybe a bit deficient in that area, how do you try to get them to increase their performance? Especially in terms of in-person interactions? Jordan: Sure. So there’s a couple of things we can do to target specific weak points. One, I always try to break things down to non-verbal communication. It doesn’t always come down to that, it often does. So when we find people that are, and this is just one specific instance, because it’s impossible to cover every single outcome or iteration of this, but when we see people who are hunched over computers all day, studying, reading, grading papers, typing, writing, whatever it is, we often find that there’s a closed and unfriendly looking posture, even if that person is friendly enough. And so something that I like to do is open people up and we use the doorway drill. And what this is essentially is every time you walk through a doorway, you would straighten up your posture, chest out a little bit, shoulders back. You don’t have to exaggerate it, you’ll look kind of silly. But just shoulders back, chin up, chest up, smile on your face, open, positive, confident body language. And the idea is we’re walking through doorways so many times during the day that we reset ourselves a lot. And I know what’s going to happen is as soon as people hear this they’re going to go through one door and do it and go “that’s cool” and then they’re going to walk through 500 more doors in the next week and not do it one single time. So what I recommend people do is grab those little post-it notes that usually aren’t worth the paper they’re used for because they’re too tiny. The bright yellow or pink or green ones. Stick them up on the doorframe at eye level. At what that will do is that will interrupt your autopilot response so when you’re walking through your office door, your bathroom door, your bedroom door, your front door, or whatever it is in your house or office, you go “What’s that post-it note? Oh right, I’m supposed to straighten up and reset my posture.” You don’t have to write anything on it. People don’t have to go “What’s that post-it note for?” It’s just a post-it note. Doesn’t matter. And you’ll reset your body language. And you’ll start to develop that as a habit. Eventually you won’t need the post-it notes. And what that does is it creates a default open, positive and upright posture. And what that does is when people … when we become a blip on other people’s radar, we treat them as the first impression dictates. So if someone walks in and they’re hunched over and they’re looking at their phone, we think this person’s busy, they’re closed off, maybe they’re cranky, we don’t know. But if someone walks in and they’re upright and they’re positive and they’re smiling, we think oh, this is a friendly, outgoing person. And we start to treat people as such. And when people start to treat us a certain way, that actually trains the way that we see ourselves and the way that we behave, because we’re really just reacting to the environment around us. So once people start to talk to us and chat us up and treat us like we’re charismatic, outgoing and friendly, we start to behave as such. So really these post-it notes create this virtuous cycle where you’ve got great body language, non-verbal communication, people start treating you like somebody who behaves that way, and then we’re training other people how to treat us, and by doing so, we start to live into that particular reputation. Isaiah: So what’s the best way to start networking now if you’re already behind? Let’s say, you need a job yesterday. What are just some quick things that you might suggest to do if you’re desperate? Jordan: Sure. So the way to start this is one, layoff life lines is a great exercise to do this. But that’s not a daily practice. That’s something that you’ll use to re-engage some relationships that you’ve let fall by the wayside and kick off the rust. But it’s about consistency and daily practice. One of the daily practices that I do every day is, I don’t have a fancy name for it, it’s called text re-engage. I’m open to ideas on what we call this. But essentially what we do is whenever I’m in line for coffee or I’m waiting for a bus or something like that or an airline lounge or gate, instead of scrolling through Instagram mindlessly, what I’ll do is I’ll go open up my phone. I’ll scroll into my text message app, and you know, you’ve got those messages all the way at the bottom where it’s like oh yeah, I had lunch with them at a financial conference in San Diego three years ago and then never kept in touch. What I’ll do is I’ll find the people at the bottom of that text message list, because those are the sort of weaker and dormant ties. And I will reach out to those people. And it’s sort of script, but it’s more of structure, and the structure’s important. Essentially this will re-engage people, and you’ll start conversations. But you have to do it in the right way. First of all, you say hello, and you use their name. That way they know it’s not some sort of mass text that you’re sending to 85 different people or it’s not some software that you’ve got. And then you say it’s been a couple of years or several months or whatever since we met at, and ideally if you remember where you met them you put that in there. If you don’t, don’t worry about it. You can say it’s been awhile since we talked, if you don’t know where you met. And then you can say I’d love to hear the latest what’s going on with you, for me I’m, and then just put like one line, for me I’m doing my PhD, I’m still hanging out studying in Germany, just got married, whatever it is. You throw that in there and you say I’d love to hear the latest from you. I’ve been bad keeping in touch and I’m going to remedy that. And then you say no rush on the reply. Hope to hear from you soon. And then you sign your name. You’ve got to sign your name otherwise it’s like “new phone, who this” or worse, they’re embarrassed that they don’t remember you or that they … If I don’t have your number saved, I can either say oh my gosh, this is awkward, who is this? Or I can just ignore it and you’ll never know that I did get the text. So sign off with your name. Isaiah: So you’re reaching out. There is purpose here. To build your network because opportunities come from it. And I think a lot of us really shift into that gear of wanting to drive a result. How do you stay out of that mindset so you can come across as authentically wanting to build a relationship? Jordan: There’s a popular sales maxim called ABC, always be closing. Well, I prefer ABG, which means “always be generous” or “always be giving”. And what this means is that we want to help other people without the attachment of getting anything in return. And so if I’m doing the text re-engage and one week somebody comes back to me and says “Yeah, I’ve got a book coming out but I need an editor because my other editor quit” and then I meet somebody else and they’re editing, I go oh, okay, I’m just going to connect these two people in my network. I’m not connecting them because one day I need free editing and one day I need free book writing. I’m not thinking about what’s in it for me at all. All I’m trying to do is connect other people in my network to each other, and that is my value add. Because a lot of people go, if I’m a graphic designer “I can’t just give free graphics to everyone.” You’re not doing the legwork there. What you’re doing is taking your existing network nodes and tying them together. Which makes this process really scalable. This isn’t five hours of free work that you’re going to do for everyone every day. You could make 100 introductions a week and it probably wouldn’t even dent your productivity time. Because it’s just an email that goes to each party and then connects to each person. And some people go “Well, I want to make a lot of introductions.” By the time you’re making dozens and dozens of introductions, you should just hire an assistant that can do this for you because your network is so expansive that you’re probably seeing a lot of ROI from it. But with ABG, or always be giving instead of always be closing, this is something that is a little bit hard to explain because a lot of people are like “But then you secretly do want something.” The answer to that is more or less, yes, but it’s not something specific and it doesn’t have to come from those people. So if I make 100 networking connections and I’m just giving value first and I’m not keeping score and thinking oh, I’m going to get something from them, I can help 100 people. If 99 of them never help me back with anything, who cares? I’ve banked a bunch of good will, I helped out a bunch of good people. They’ve got a bunch of stuff done. And then when you need something, you can sort of float that out to your network and you’ll have people clamoring and climbing over each other to help you because they owe you one. And occasionally, you’ll find one person who goes “Hey, you know, that introduction you made three years ago resulted in a business. We would love to sponsor your show or have you fly out and speak” or “We owe you big time.” You find people where you introduced them to their new career, their significant other, their wife, whatever, husband. That’s kind of a big deal. It’s a position of honor. Principal Scientist Career Track: A Conversation with Scot Matkovich, Ph.D. Isaiah: Why did you choose to go into R&D in industry? Scot: It’s very much a continuation of what I think have been life aims of sorts for the last 20 years. I only started a PhD because I had, perhaps not a particularly focused goal in mind of what kind of disease research I wanted to do, but I wanted to work in a way that would ultimately make an impact on the health of people suffering diseases. A lot of friends have asked me, “Well, why didn’t you become a physician,” or go into something like that and I supposed I could have, but at the time of my life where I had to make decisions like that I was your archetypal shy nerd, didn’t really want to engage with a whole lot of people. That is still a fundamental part of my personality but I think some of the shell has disappeared over the last several years. So I always wanted to make an impact in human health because I really didn’t know much different than following the traditional academic path and you must remember, growing up and going to school in Australia, essentially, there is not an R&D industry of sorts there. It’s too small a country and too small an environment to support most of that. So I went along a traditional academic path, I was encouraged to post-doc in the US, which I did in order to take advantage of the greater infrastructure here and the greater number of opportunities. It took a while going down that path before I realized that I wasn’t really having the kind of impact on health research that I might have wanted to and I certainly began to realize that within the academic system, unless you’re quite far up the pyramid, it can be very difficult to be terribly influential, and it’s not that I had a personality need that I had to run the whole show or figure everything out, but I did want to be doing something that I felt was impactful even though I eventually acquired a junior faculty position and had the opportunity to run my own lab for a while. That grind of convincing a relatively small group of your peers at the NIH that what you are doing is important really got to me and I think the other thing that got to me was a lot very well-meaning advice from people who had been successful in the system saying, “You know, you’re just going to have to focus on something very small at the start. You’re going to have to play by everybody’s rules. You’re going to have to do what you have to do in order to get your grants funded, and then once you’ve achieved some sort of level of seniority, then you can go off and do what you want to.” I think as soon as that advice started percolating through, I thought, I’ve got to get the hell out of here. This is not compatible with my aims. So I’ve now been with Lilly for three and a little months, a reasonably short amount of time, and yet, I can tell you that everyday I am sitting in rooms of really smart, really hardworking dedicated people who are all trying to get to that same goal of improving human health without having to…

    Full show notes at the publisher

    Previous 1 72 73 74 75 76 80 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights