TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    News

    Opening Arguments

    Opening Arguments is a law show that helps you make sense of the news! Comedian Thomas Smith and lawyer Matt Cameron help you understand not only current events, but also deeper legal concepts and areas! The schedule is M-W-F, with the main show on Monday and Friday and Vapid Response on Wednesday!

    Advertise
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    OA393: Gabe Roth of Fix the Court Jun 09, 2020
    Show notes

    Today we're joined by Gabe Roth, executive director of https://fixthecourt.com/. Fix the Court is a national, nonpartisan organization that advocates for non-ideological “fixes” that would make the federal courts, and primarily the U.S. Supreme Court, more open and more accountable to the American people. In his work, Gabe has been tracking some curious financial dealings of "friend" of the show Justin Walker. We discuss that, and other ethics questions and reforms related to the court system.


    OA392: In the Aftermath of George Floyd Jun 05, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's extra-long show -- two hours if you're a patron! -- tackles all the issues surrounding the state of our Union in the aftermath of the George Floyd murder, including questions about which charges should be filed against Derek Chauvin, whether Trump can invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807, and much, much more! Oh, and as a bonus, we also have a "lightning round" Yodel Mountain segment (with deep dives for patrons).

    We begin with an in-depth discussion of an argument made by arguably the country's greatest legal mind, Laurence Tribe, that the murder-3 charge against George Floyd was sure to be dismissed. Find out why Andrew thinks Tribe is wrong, even in light of the Minnesota DA's decision to add a murder-2 charge to Chauvin's charges. After that, Andrew will explain one thing he was wrong about... due to a "quirk" in Minnesota's laws regarding felony murder and the merger doctrine.

    Then, we discuss Trump's invocation of the Insurrection Act of 1807 to justify potentially sending armed forces into American cities. You'll learn exactly how not justified this is... and whether it matters.

    After that, it's time to (briefly!) check in with Black Lives Matter and evaluate their lawsuit against Eric Garcetti for an injunction to block the Los Angeles curfew. Will it succeed? (No.)

    We're not remotely done, though! After all that, it's time to head on up for a lightning round atop Yodel Mountain., were we check in on (1) Rod Rosenstein's Senate testimony, (2) Judge Sullivan's DC Circuit brief in the Flynn case, and (3) a weird story making the rounds regarding a 2016 lawsuit filed (and dropped) against Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.

    After all that, it’s time for an all-new #T3BE involving character testimony. It's a tough question; can Thomas get it right? Listen and find out!

    And remember -- if you're a patron, you get a ton of bonus content in this episode, including deep dives on each and every one of these stories!

    Patreon Bonuses

    There's a new Patreon amicus thread in addition to all the other patreon goodies.

    Appearances

    None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group (virtually!), please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. COVID-19 is still a crisis.
    2. On Floyd: (a) you can click here to read the revised Chauvin charging document; (b) this is the here's the Laurence Tribe article; and (c) here's the Greg Egan law review article. We also discuss a number of cases including State v. Wahlberg, 296 N.W. 2d 408 (Minn. 1980), State v. Loebach, 310 N.W. 2d 58 (Minn. 1981), and State v. Barnes, 713 N.W.2d 325 (Minn. 2006).
    3. On the Insurrection Act of 1807, 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, we cited two specific provisions: § 252 and § 253. And we discussed Greg Gianforte back in Episode 72. During the bonus, we also discussed two executive orders from the George H. W. Bush presidency: EO 12690 and EO 12804, and two corresponding Proclamations: 6023 and 6427.
    4. During the bonus, we also break down how Vol. I of the Mueller Report contradicts Rosenstein's testimony.
    5. Finally, check out Sullivan's D.C. Circuit brief.

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA391: Republicans Are Still Trying To Break the Government, Part Eleven Billion Jun 02, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode takes a deep dive into H.R. 965, which (quite sensibly) permits proxy voting in the House of Representatives in light of the COVID-19 crisis, and the lawsuit filed by various Republican lawmakers to try and stop it. Good news! The lawsuit has no chance of success thanks to... litigation prompted by Donald Trump.

    We begin, however, with an update on the DOJ probe into insider trading allegations against four Senators that allegedly -- either on their own behalf or via another party -- sold off stock prior to the public pronouncements about COVID-19 that tanked the stock market. Who got off? Who's left under the microscope? Is there anything nefarious here? We break it all down for you!

    After that it's time to delve into the recent legislation and accompanying (nonsense) lawsuit by Republicans challenging the House's simple resolution, H.R. 965 (and the implementing legislation, H.R. 967). Find out how the whole thing is going to be precluded thanks to the D.C. Circuit's recent ruling in Blumenthal v. Trump, which was of course hailed as a victory for the President at the time.

    Then, it's time to check back in with #T3BE involving potential negligence for a factory that failed to install sprinklers. Can Thomas pull this one out? Listen and find out!

    Patreon Bonuses

    If you missed our Live Q&A #32, the audio is now up for all Patrons! Also remember that Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief!

    Appearances

    None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group (virtually!), please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. DOJ probe links: (a) here's the NPR link to the story; and (b) here's the GovTrack link to the fact that Marco Rubio still doesn't do his damn job.
    2. On remote voting, check out (a) H.R. 965 (and the implementing legislation, H.R. 967; (b) the D.C. Circuit's recent ruling in Blumenthal v. Trump; (c) our discussion of that case in Episode 361; (d) the Congressional Research Service article we discussed; and (e) United States v. Ballin, 144 U.S. 1 (1892).

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    Bonus: George Floyd and Policing the Police May 31, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's emergency episode breaks down everything you need to know about the death of George Floyd and the charges filed against Officer Derek Chauvin in Minnesota.

    Patreon Bonuses

    We’ve got an all-new Live Q&A scheduled for Sunday, May 31 at 7 pm Eastern / 4 pm Pacific, and Patrons can click here to suggest questions and vote on the ones they want answered. Also remember that Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief!

    Appearances

    Andrew was just a guest on the latest episode of The Daily Beans. And if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. Please do check out how to partner with Black Lives Matter.

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA390: Trump's War on Twitter (A Deep Dive on Section 230) May 29, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode breaks down the latest temper tantrum and accompanying executive order by our game show host president attacking social media platforms for having the temerity to engage in fact-checking. You're going to be hearing a lot about "Section 230" -- so we're here to tell you exactly what that means, what Trump is trying to do, and why it matters.

    We begin, however, with a pretty straightforward Andrew Was Right now that Tulsi Gabbard has voluntarily dismissed her defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton that we covered back in Episode 354 ("A Russian Asset Sues What?").

    Then it's time for our deep dive into CompuServe, Prodigy, section 230 of the Telecommunications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230 -- which ended internet porn forever -- and what all of that has to do with Trump's latest tantrum over being fact-checked on Twitter. You won't want to miss it!

    After that, it's time for an update on the amicus brief we're filing in the Flynn case. We tell you what Flynn's best case is, and walk through how it does and does not inform Judge Sullivan's discretion under Rule 48(a).

    And then, of course, we end with an all-new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam involving a fire at one warehouse spreading to another. If you want to play along, just share out this episode on social media using the hashtag #T3BE and we might pick you as next week's winner!

    Patreon Bonuses

    We've got an all-new Live Q&A scheduled for Sunday, May 31 at 7 pm Eastern / 4 pm Pacific, and Patrons can click here to suggest questions and vote on the ones they want answered. Also remember that Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief!

    Appearances

    Andrew was just a guest on the latest episode of The Daily Beans. And if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. Tulsi links: (a) click here for the news that Tulsi Gabbard has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit; (b) here to read the original defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton; (c) the

    OA389: #Obamagate (w/guest AG!) May 26, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode brings back AG of the Mueller She Wrote and Daily Beans podcasts to help delve in to all the craziness that is #Obamagate. And, as a bonus, we also discuss the five Inspectors General fired by Trump and what they were investigating. You won't want to miss this special episode!

    As it turns out, #Obamagate is nonsense. Who knew?

    After the hour-long interview, it's time to revisit #T3BE, in which Thomas decided the issue was hearsay, not spousal privilege. Did he get the answer correct? Listen and find out!

    Patreon Bonuses

    Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief!

    Appearances

    Andrew was just a guest host on Episode 123 of the Skepticrat, discussing some of these same issues. And if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. Check out this story on Steve Linick, the AG investigating Mike Pompeo.

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA388: Reinstating the Rule of Law May 22, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode checks in on all the latest goings-on in the Trump administration that probably don't violate the law but do undermine the norms of 200+ years of government, from firing Inspectors General that are potentially interested in government accountability to the DOJ's refusal to turn over the unredacted Mueller Report to the House Judiciary Committee to the collusion between Bob Barr and Michael Flynn. You won't want to miss it.

    We begin with some pre-show news about Cory Wilson, the latest completely insane, hyper-partisan (and 49-year-old) Trump nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals.

    From there, we take a deep dive into the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5a U.S.C. § 3, and the legal protections for IGs (or lack thereof).

    After that, it's time to check in on the latest order by the Supreme Court staying the production of the unredacted Mueller Report to the House Judiciary Committee. We explain exactly what that means and when, if ever, you should start panicking.

    Then, it's time for an update on the Flynn case where we're filing The Opening Arguments Amicus Brief! Also, we check in on a truly terrible Sidney Powell filing seeking mandamus from the D.C. Circuit.

    After all that, it's time for a brand-new #T3BE about a man, his yacht, and insurance fraud -- in which Thomas tries to figure out if the issue is privilege, hearsay, or something else entirely.

    Patreon Bonuses

    Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief! And if you missed our live Q&A, you can check out the audio here!

    Appearances

    Andrew was just a guest on the latest episode of the Daily Beans podcast! And if you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. Cory Wilson was rated a tepid "Qualified" by the ABA his first-go-round; that got upgraded to "mostly Well-Qualified" when he was renominated.
    2. Check out the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5a U.S.C. § 3.
    3. This is the Supreme Court order staying the production of the unredacted Mueller Report. Here's the petition for mandamus, and the opposition by the House of Representatives.
    4. We last covered the Flynn case in Episode 386. Click here to read the 4th Circuit's mandamus opinion in In re Flynn. And click here to check out the late-breaking order from the 4th Circuit requiring additional briefing from Judge Sullivan.

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA387: You Pay the Priest (w/Andrew Seidel) May 19, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode features an interview with one of our favorite recurring guests, Andrew Seidel, who returns to warn us of new regulations pursuant to the CARES Act that are permitting churches to take PPP money. Yes, that means your tax dollars are literally paying the salaries of ministers, priests, imams, and the like.

    We also discuss what just happened in Wisconsin, where the Supreme Court invalidated Gov. Evers's stay-at-home order. Is it bad? Listen and find out! (Yes.)

    After that, it's time for the answer to #T3BE about when & where double jeopardy attaches.

    Patreon Bonuses

    Patrons can give their input on the OA Amicus Brief! And if you missed our live Q&A, you can check out the audio here!

    Appearances

    None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. If you missed Andrew Seidel's last appearance in Episode 376, go check it out!

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA386: The Opening Arguments Amicus Brief! May 15, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode marks a milestone for the show: we're going to file an amicus curiae brief in the Michael Flynn case. Find out exactly how & why we're doing this!

    We begin, however, with a brief update in the various emoluments cases, including an update on the two orders released this morning by the 4th Circuit en banc.

    After that it's time to dig into all the developments in the Flynn litigation that will lead to the filing of Opening Arguments' first amicus brief!

    Then, it's time for #T3BE, featuring next week's guest, Andrew Seidel!

    Patreon Bonuses

    If you missed our live Q&A, you can check out the audio here!

    Appearances

    None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group, please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

    Show Notes & Links

    1. The last time we broke down the emoluments clause cases was in Episode 361. You can check out the two orders released this morning by the 4th Circuit en banc (the first one is the lengthy discussion).
    2. Flynn docs: the DOJ's Motion to Dismiss; the Notice of Intent to file amicus by the Watergate Prosecutors, as well as the 9th Circuit's Opinion in U.S. v. Hector.

    -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

    -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

    -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

    -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

    -Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

    -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!


    OA385: Reality Check! (w/Allison Gill) May 12, 2020
    Show notes

    Today's episode features an in-depth interview with Allison Gill of American Atheists regarding the just-released survey Reality Check, which interviews more than 34,000 nonreligious individuals, gathering data as a precursor to support specific arguments with lawmakers in terms of lobbying for recognizing atheist constituents. You won't want to miss it!

    We begin, however, with a bit more in-depth analysis about the nonjusticiability doctrine and how it might affect the Supreme Court's decision in the Mazars and Deutsche Bank subpoena cases -- which are being heard today by the Supreme Court!

    Then, it's time for our in-depth interview with Allison where we talk about discrimination against atheists, including a deep dive into the actual research that shows how atheists are treated in society -- even among educated peers.

    After all that, it's time for the answer to #T3BE 177 involving a noxious factory next to a residence and mini-golf. Can Thomas keep up his winning streak? There's only one way to find out!


    Previous 1 89 90 91 92 93 131 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters

    1

    Inside Strategic Coach: Connecting Entrepreneurs With What Really Matters Business
    WSJ Your Money Briefing

    2

    WSJ Your Money Briefing Business
    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task

    3

    FORTUNE Unfiltered with Aaron Task Business
    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women

    4

    FORTUNE OnStage Presents: The Most Powerful Women Business
    Slate Money

    5

    Slate Money Business
    In The Dark – The New Yorker

    6

    In The Dark – The New Yorker Business News
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights