TopPodcast.com
Menu
  • Home
  • Top Charts
  • Top Networks
  • Top Apps
  • Top Independents
  • Top Podfluencers
  • Top Picks
    • Top Business Podcasts
    • Top True Crime Podcasts
    • Top Finance Podcasts
    • Top Comedy Podcasts
    • Top Music Podcasts
    • Top Womens Podcasts
    • Top Kids Podcasts
    • Top Sports Podcasts
    • Top News Podcasts
    • Top Tech Podcasts
    • Top Crypto Podcasts
    • Top Entrepreneurial Podcasts
    • Top Fantasy Sports Podcasts
    • Top Political Podcasts
    • Top Science Podcasts
    • Top Self Help Podcasts
    • Top Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Top Stocks Podcasts
  • Podcast News
  • About Us
  • Podcast Advertising
  • Contact
Not in our directory?
Add Show Here
Podcast Equipment
Center

toppodcastlogoOur TOPPODCAST Picks

  • Comedy
  • Crypto
  • Sports
  • News
  • Politics
  • True Crime
  • Business
  • Finance

Follow Us

toppodcastlogoStay Connected

    View Top 200 Chart
    Back to Rankings Page
    Education

    Law to Fact

    Law to Fact is the renown podcast for law students where substantive legal issues are discussed with distinguished law professors from across the nation. Today, it is the go to place for all things law including course material, application tips, study strategies, and career advice—all packed into one podcast. Law to Fact is hosted by Professor Leslie Garfield Tenzer of the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University.

    Advertise

    Copyright: ℗ & © 2019 Law To Fact

    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Play
    • Spotify

    Latest Episodes:
    Mortgages Mar 14, 2018
    Show notes

    In this episode, I speak with Professor John Nolon, Elisabeth Haub School of Law, nationally recognized as the Director of the Elisabeth Haub School of Law Land Use Law Center. Prof. Nolon discusses mortgages. After an astute explanation of the levels of analysis necessary to understand mortgages, Prof. Nolon and I discuss how this topic, and property class in general, fits into the broader picture of educating first-year law students.
    John R. Nolon is Distinguished Professor of Law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University where he teaches property, land use, dispute resolution, and sustainable development law courses and is Counsel to the Law School's Land Use Law Center which he founded in 1993. He served as Adjunct Professor of land use law and policy at the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies from 2001-2016.


    Professor Nolon was named one of two Distinguished Professors in 2014 by Pace University. Previously, he served as the James D. Hopkins Professor from 2009-2011 and the Charles A. Frueauff Research Professor of Law during the 1991-92, 1997-98, 1999-2000, and 2000-01 academic years. He received the Richard L. Ottinger Faculty Achievement Award in 1999 and won the Goettel Prize for faculty scholarship in 2006, and was named Outstanding Teacher of the Year in 2016-2017. In 2009, he was awarded the National Leadership Award for a Planning Advocate by the American Planning Association. The International City/County Management Association presented its Honorary Membership Award to Professor Nolon in 2014, its highest award to a person outside the city management profession for exemplary service to local government. The NY Planning Federation presented him its Lifetime Achievement Award in 2018. He is on the advisory boards of the Sustainable Development Code, the NY Planning Federation, and the Westchester/Fairfield chapter of the Urban Land Institute.

    Professor Nolon received his J.D. degree from the University of Michigan Law School where he was a member of the Barrister's Academic Honor Society. His undergraduate degree is from the University of Nebraska, where he was President of the Senior Honor Society. He has served as a consultant to President Carter's Council on Development Choices for the 1980's, President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development, New York Governor George Pataki's Transition Team, and Governor Elliot Spitzer’s Transition Team. He is a member of the Editorial Board of The Land Use and Environmental Law Review, published by Thomson-West and of the State and Local Government eJournal of the American Bar Association. Professor Nolon received a Fulbright Scholarship to study sustainable development law in Argentina in 1994-1995.
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know! You can email us at leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet to @lawtofact. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Instagram (@lawtofact) and to like us on Facebook! And finally, your ratings and reviews matter! Please leave us a review on iTunes.

    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact? Join our mailing list by visiting us at www.lawtofact.com.

    Support the show


    Marbury v. Madison Feb 28, 2018
    Show notes

    In this episode, Professor Karl Coplan, Elisabeth Haub School of Law, explains Marbury v. Madison. Prof. Koplan has a particular insight into the workings of the Supreme Court having clerked for Justice Warren Berger. And, true to his commitment to environmental law, Prof. Koplan is working hard to leave a zero carbon footprint, kayaking to school. Look for an easter egg around 16:45!
    Professor Karl S. Coplan has been a Professor and Associate Professor of Law at Pace Law School and director of Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic since 1994. Prior to joining the Pace faculty, he practiced land use and environmental litigation for eight years with the New York City firm of Berle, Kass & Case. As the principal outside counsel for Riverkeeper, Inc., Professor Coplan and the Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic have brought numerous lawsuits enforcing the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws. These cases include Catskill Mountains Chapter, Trout Unlimited v. City of New York, in which the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that the transfer of polluted, silt-laden water from one watershed to another required a permit pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act. Professor Coplan has also participated in litigation and Clean Water Act permitting proceedings involving several Hudson River power plants, including the proposed Bowline 3 power plant, and the Lovett, Roseton, Danskammer, and Athens plants.

    In addition to directing the Pace Environmental Litigation Clinic, Professor Coplan teaches courses in Environmental Law and Constitutional Law. He is recently the author of the chapter on Citizen Suits in Environmental Litigation, Law and Strategy (ABA, Cary Perlman, Ed.) and the chapter on Takings Law in Handbook on Constitutional Environmental Law (ABA, James May, Ed., forthcoming 2010).

    Before entering private practice, Professor Coplan clerked for The Honorable Warren E. Burger, Chief Justice of the United States, and The Honorable Leonard I. Garth, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Professor Coplan received his J.D. degree from Columbia Law School in 1984 and his B.A. degree from Middlebury College in 1980.


    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know! You can email us at leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet to @lawtofact. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Instagram (@lawtofact) and to like us on Facebook! And finally, your ratings and reviews matter! Please leave us a review on iTunes.

    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact? Join our mailing list by visiting us at www.lawtofact.com.

    Support the show


    Common Law Contracts: Parol Evidence and Extrinsic Evidence Feb 13, 2018
    Show notes

    This episode provides an overview of the parol evidence rule and extrinsic evidence. The Parol Evidence rule is a substantive rule that regulates the introduction of evidence in a lawsuit challenging the existence of a particular term in a contract. it prevents parties from introducing evidence of prior oral or written agreements or contemporaneous oral agreements that contradict a term in a written contract. The purpose of this rule is to prevent fraud at trial. The episode also discusses extrinsic evidence, which is outside evidence used to explain a term.
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know! You can email us at leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet to @lawtofact. Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and Instagram (@lawtofact) and to like us on Facebook! And finally, your ratings and reviews matter! Please leave us a review on iTunes.

    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact? Join our mailing list by visiting us at www.lawtofact.com.


    Support the show


    UCC Article 2 Terms Including Warranties and Delivery Terms Dec 26, 2017
    Show notes

    In this episode, we review most of Article 2 Chapter 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). This podcast includes a discussion of gap fillers, warranties, and delivery terms and highlights instances in which you might see this provisions on an exam.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    UCC Article 2 Damages and Damages Formulas Dec 26, 2017
    Show notes

    In this episode, we provide an overview of the UCC Damage formulas, including "lost volume sellers," cover damages and the formula for breach of warranty and explain when to use these formulas on an exam.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    The Erie Doctrine Dec 26, 2017
    Show notes

    In this episode, we discuss the Erie Doctrine with Michael Mushlin, Professor of Law at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law. Professor Mushlin walks us through "the house of Erie" and explains the steps in analyzing an Erie Problem that students might see in an exam. It's a fun conversation that helps you understand and appreciate Erie in a way you probably hadn't before.
    About our Guest:
    Professor Michael B. Mushlin teaches Civil Procedure, Evidence, and Prisoners' Rights at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University. He is the author of book chapters and articles on a variety of subjects involving evidence, federal jurisdiction, civil procedure, children's rights, and prisoners' rights that have appeared in journals such as the Yale Law and Policy Review, UCLA Law Review, Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review, The Journal of Legal Education, and the Brooklyn Law Review. He also is the author of RIGHTS OF PRISONERS (4th ed West) a four volume comprehensive treatise on the law regarding prisoners' rights and NEW YORK EVIDENCE WITH OBJECTIONS (4th ed National Institute of Trial Advocacy 2013) (with Jo Ann Harris). You can read more about Professor Mushlin here.

    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    UCC Article 2 Contract Formation (Including Battle of the Forms) Nov 28, 2017
    Show notes

    This episode provides an overview of contract formation under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The episode discusses offer, acceptance, firm offer and "battle of the forms." We end with an analytical framework and strategy for attacking contract formation on a law school exam.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    Torts: Negligence; Causation Nov 28, 2017
    Show notes

    This episode provides an overview of both factual and legal causation. We end with an analytical framework and strategy for attacking the causation element of negligence on a law school exam.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    Torts: Negligence; Duty Nov 28, 2017
    Show notes

    This episode provides a brief overview negligence reviews the duty element of negligence. The episode discusses the rules and relevant case law necessary to understand when the law creates a duty, breach of which can lead to liability. We end with an analytical framework and strategy for attacking negligence and duty on a law school exam.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    Contracts: Consideration Nov 28, 2017
    Show notes

    This episode reviews the common law consideration. The episode discusses the rules and relevant case law necessary to understand consideration and ends with an analytical framework and strategy for discussing consideration on a law school exam.
    Key Takeaways:

    1. Consideration is giving up something of value in exchange for a promise.
    2. One form of consideration if giving up something you are not legally to give up, e.g. giving up alcohol if you are over 21.
    3. Consideration is required (along with offer and acceptance) to create a legally binding contract.
    4. Past acts can't support consideration.

    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.

    Support the show


    Previous 1 10 11 12 13 Next

    Related Podcasts

    Making Sense with Sam Harris

    1

    Making Sense with Sam Harris Education
    Grammar Girl

    2

    Grammar Girl Education
    Good Life Project

    3

    Good Life Project Education
    Explain It to Me

    4

    Explain It to Me Education
    Team Never Quit

    5

    Team Never Quit Comedy
    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement

    6

    Optimal Living Daily – Personal Development and Self-Improvement Alternative Health
    footer-logo

    Contact Us

    Toll Free: 844-670-7747

    Links

    • Home
    • Top Charts
    • Networks
    • Apps
    • Independents Podcasts
    • Podcast Advertising
    • Podcast News
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Analytics & Insights

    Stay Connected

      Privacy, Terms of Use & Our Code of Ethics Protecting Content Creators Copyrights